1
|
Godoy Junior CA, Miele F, Mäkitie L, Fiorenzato E, Koivu M, Bakker LJ, Groot CUD, Redekop WK, van Deen WK. Attitudes Toward the Adoption of Remote Patient Monitoring and Artificial Intelligence in Parkinson's Disease Management: Perspectives of Patients and Neurologists. Patient 2024; 17:275-285. [PMID: 38182935 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-023-00669-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Early detection of Parkinson's Disease (PD) progression remains a challenge. As remote patient monitoring solutions (RMS) and artificial intelligence (AI) technologies emerge as potential aids for PD management, there's a gap in understanding how end users view these technologies. This research explores patient and neurologist perspectives on AI-assisted RMS. METHODS Qualitative interviews and focus-groups were conducted with 27 persons with PD (PwPD) and six neurologists from Finland and Italy. The discussions covered traditional disease progression detection and the prospects of integrating AI and RMS. Sessions were recorded, transcribed, and underwent thematic analysis. RESULTS The study involved five individual interviews (four Italian participants and one Finnish) and six focus-groups (four Finnish and two Italian) with PwPD. Additionally, six neurologists (three from each country) were interviewed. Both cohorts voiced frustration with current monitoring methods due to their limited real-time detection capabilities. However, there was enthusiasm for AI-assisted RMS, contingent upon its value addition, user-friendliness, and preservation of the doctor-patient bond. While some PwPD had privacy and trust concerns, the anticipated advantages in symptom regulation seemed to outweigh these apprehensions. DISCUSSION The study reveals a willingness among PwPD and neurologists to integrate RMS and AI into PD management. Widespread adoption requires these technologies to provide tangible clinical benefits, remain user-friendly, and uphold trust within the physician-patient relationship. CONCLUSION This study offers insights into the potential drivers and barriers for adopting AI-assisted RMS in PD care. Recognizing these factors is pivotal for the successful integration of these digital health tools in PD management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Antonio Godoy Junior
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, 3062 PA, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
| | - Francesco Miele
- Department of Political and Social Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Laura Mäkitie
- Department of Neurology, Brain Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | - Maija Koivu
- Department of Neurology, Brain Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Lytske Jantien Bakker
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, 3062 PA, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Carin Uyl-de Groot
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, 3062 PA, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - William Ken Redekop
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, 3062 PA, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Welmoed Kirsten van Deen
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, 3062 PA, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Galekop MMJ, Uyl-de Groot C, Redekop WK. Economic Evaluation of a Personalized Nutrition Plan Based on Omic Sciences Versus a General Nutrition Plan in Adults with Overweight and Obesity: A Modeling Study Based on Trial Data in Denmark. Pharmacoecon Open 2024; 8:313-331. [PMID: 38113009 PMCID: PMC10883904 DOI: 10.1007/s41669-023-00461-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/26/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since there is no diet that is perfect for everyone, personalized nutrition approaches are gaining popularity to achieve goals such as the prevention of obesity-related diseases. However, appropriate choices about funding and encouraging personalized nutrition approaches should be based on sufficient evidence of their effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. In this study, we assessed whether a newly developed personalized plan (PP) could be cost-effective relative to a non-personalized plan in Denmark. METHODS Results of a 10-week randomized controlled trial were combined with a validated obesity economic model to estimate lifetime cost-effectiveness. In the trial, the intervention group (PP) received personalized home-delivered meals based on metabolic biomarkers and personalized behavioral change messages. In the control group these meals and messages were not personalized. Effects were measured in body mass index (BMI) and quality of life (EQ-5D-5L). Costs [euros (€), 2020] were considered from a societal perspective. Lifetime cost-effectiveness was assessed using a multi-state Markov model. Univariate, probabilistic sensitivity, and scenario analyses were performed. RESULTS In the trial, no significant differences were found in the effectiveness of PP compared with control, but wide confidence intervals (CIs) were seen [e.g., BMI (-0.07, 95% CI -0.51, 0.38)]. Lifetime estimates showed that PP increased costs (€520,102 versus €518,366, difference: €1736) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) (15.117 versus 15.106, difference: 0.011); the incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) was therefore high (€158,798 to gain one QALY). However, a 20% decrease in intervention costs would reduce the ICUR (€23,668 per QALY gained) below an unofficial gross domestic product (GDP)-based willingness-to-pay threshold (€47,817 per QALY gained). CONCLUSION On the basis of the willingness-to-pay threshold and the non-significant differences in short-term effectiveness, PP may not be cost-effective. However, scaling up the intervention would reduce the intervention costs. Future studies should be larger and/or longer to reduce uncertainty about short-term effectiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ClinicalTrials.gov registry (NCT04590989).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Carin Uyl-de Groot
- Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - William Ken Redekop
- Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Burrack N, Hatfield LA, Bakx P, Banerjee A, Chen YC, Fu C, Godoy Junior C, Gordon M, Heine R, Huang N, Ko DT, Lix LM, Novack V, Pasea L, Qiu F, Stukel TA, Uyl-de Groot C, Ravi B, Al-Azazi S, Weinreb G, Cram P, Landon BE. Variation in care for patients presenting with hip fracture in six high-income countries: A cross-sectional cohort study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2023; 71:3780-3791. [PMID: 37565425 PMCID: PMC10840946 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.18530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Revised: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 07/01/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hip fractures are costly and common in older adults, but there is limited understanding of how treatment patterns and outcomes might differ between countries. METHODS We performed a retrospective serial cross-sectional cohort study of adults aged ≥66 years hospitalized with hip fracture between 2011 and 2018 in the US, Canada, England, the Netherlands, Taiwan, and Israel using population-representative administrative data. We examined mortality, hip fracture treatment approaches (total hip arthroplasty [THA], hemiarthroplasty [HA], internal fixation [IF], and nonoperative), and health system performance measures, including hospital length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmission rates, and time-to-surgery. RESULTS The total number of hip fracture admissions between 2011 and 2018 ranged from 23,941 in Israel to 1,219,696 in the US. In 2018, 30-day mortality varied from 3% (16% at 1 year) in Taiwan to 10% (27%) in the Netherlands. With regards to processes of care, the proportion of hip fractures treated with HA (range 23%-45%) and THA (0.2%-10%) differed widely across countries. For example, in 2018, THA was used to treat approximately 9% of patients in England and Israel but less than 1% in Taiwan. Overall, IF was the most common surgery performed in all countries (40%-60% of patients). IF was used in approximately 60% of patients in the US and Israel, but only 40% in England. In 2018, rates of nonoperative management ranged from 5% of patients in Taiwan to nearly 10% in England. Mean hospital LOS in 2018 ranged from 6.4 days (US) to 18.7 days (England). The 30-day readmission rate in 2018 ranged from 8% (in Canada and the Netherlands) to nearly 18% in England. The mean days to surgery in 2018 ranged from 0.5 days (Israel) to 1.6 days (Canada). CONCLUSIONS We observed substantial between-country variation in mortality, surgical approaches, and health system performance measures. These findings underscore the need for further research to inform evidence-based surgical approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nitzan Burrack
- Clinical Research Center, Soroka University Medical Center, and Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheba, Israel
| | - Laura A Hatfield
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Pieter Bakx
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Amitava Banerjee
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Cardiology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | - Yu-Chin Chen
- Institute of Hospital and Health Care Administration, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Christina Fu
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Carlos Godoy Junior
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Michal Gordon
- Clinical Research Center, Soroka University Medical Center, and Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheba, Israel
| | - Renaud Heine
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nicole Huang
- Institute of Hospital and Health Care Administration, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Dennis T Ko
- Schulich Heart Program, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
- ICES, Toronto, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Lisa M Lix
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
- George & Fay Yee Centre for Healthcare Innovation, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Victor Novack
- Clinical Research Center, Soroka University Medical Center, and Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheba, Israel
| | - Laura Pasea
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Therese A Stukel
- ICES, Toronto, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Carin Uyl-de Groot
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bheeshma Ravi
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Saeed Al-Azazi
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
- George & Fay Yee Centre for Healthcare Innovation, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Gabe Weinreb
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Peter Cram
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Medicine, UTMB, Galveston, Texas, USA
| | - Bruce E Landon
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Division of General Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Landon BE, Hatfield LA, Bakx P, Banerjee A, Chen YC, Fu C, Gordon M, Heine R, Huang N, Ko DT, Lix LM, Novack V, Pasea L, Qiu F, Stukel TA, Uyl-de Groot C, Yan L, Weinreb G, Cram P. Differences in Treatment Patterns and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction for Low- and High-Income Patients in 6 Countries. JAMA 2023; 329:1088-1097. [PMID: 37014339 PMCID: PMC10074220 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2023.1699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023]
Abstract
Importance Differences in the organization and financing of health systems may produce more or less equitable outcomes for advantaged vs disadvantaged populations. We compared treatments and outcomes of older high- and low-income patients across 6 countries. Objective To determine whether treatment patterns and outcomes for patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction differ for low- vs high-income individuals across 6 countries. Design, Setting, and Participants Serial cross-sectional cohort study of all adults aged 66 years or older hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction from 2013 through 2018 in the US, Canada, England, the Netherlands, Taiwan, and Israel using population-representative administrative data. Exposures Being in the top and bottom quintile of income within and across countries. Main Outcomes and Measures Thirty-day and 1-year mortality; secondary outcomes included rates of cardiac catheterization and revascularization, length of stay, and readmission rates. Results We studied 289 376 patients hospitalized with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and 843 046 hospitalized with non-STEMI (NSTEMI). Adjusted 30-day mortality generally was 1 to 3 percentage points lower for high-income patients. For instance, 30-day mortality among patients admitted with STEMI in the Netherlands was 10.2% for those with high income vs 13.1% for those with low income (difference, -2.8 percentage points [95% CI, -4.1 to -1.5]). One-year mortality differences for STEMI were even larger than 30-day mortality, with the highest difference in Israel (16.2% vs 25.3%; difference, -9.1 percentage points [95% CI, -16.7 to -1.6]). In all countries, rates of cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention were higher among high- vs low-income populations, with absolute differences ranging from 1 to 6 percentage points (eg, 73.6% vs 67.4%; difference, 6.1 percentage points [95% CI, 1.2 to 11.0] for percutaneous intervention in England for STEMI). Rates of coronary artery bypass graft surgery for patients with STEMI in low- vs high-income strata were similar but for NSTEMI were generally 1 to 2 percentage points higher among high-income patients (eg, 12.5% vs 11.0% in the US; difference, 1.5 percentage points [95% CI, 1.3 to 1.8 ]). Thirty-day readmission rates generally also were 1 to 3 percentage points lower and hospital length of stay generally was 0.2 to 0.5 days shorter for high-income patients. Conclusions and Relevance High-income individuals had substantially better survival and were more likely to receive lifesaving revascularization and had shorter hospital lengths of stay and fewer readmissions across almost all countries. Our results suggest that income-based disparities were present even in countries with universal health insurance and robust social safety net systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruce E. Landon
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of General Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Laura A. Hatfield
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Pieter Bakx
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Amitava Banerjee
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, England
- Department of Cardiology, University College London Hospitals, London, England
| | - Yu-Chin Chen
- Institute of Hospital and Health Care Administration, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Christina Fu
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Michal Gordon
- Clinical Research Center, Soroka University Medical Center, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheba, Israel
| | - Renaud Heine
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nicole Huang
- Institute of Hospital and Health Care Administration, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Dennis T. Ko
- Schulich Heart Program, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Sunnybrook Research Institute Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lisa M. Lix
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
- George & Fay Yee Centre for Healthcare Innovation, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Victor Novack
- Institute of Hospital and Health Care Administration, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Laura Pasea
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, England
| | - Feng Qiu
- Division of General Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Therese A. Stukel
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Carin Uyl-de Groot
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lin Yan
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
- George & Fay Yee Centre for Healthcare Innovation, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Gabe Weinreb
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Peter Cram
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Luyendijk M, Blommestein H, Uyl-de Groot C, Siesling S, Jager A. Regulatory Approval, Reimbursement, and Clinical Use of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitors in Metastatic Breast Cancer in the Netherlands. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2256170. [PMID: 36795415 PMCID: PMC9936344 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.56170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/17/2023] Open
Abstract
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This study found that CDK4/6 inhibitors rapidly reached many eligible patients with metastatic breast cancer and were adopted gradually over time in the Netherlands. Adoption of innovative medicines may be further optimized, and better transparency of the availability of new medicines during different phases of the postapproval access pathway is needed. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cohort study reviewed approval and reimbursement decisions of the CDK4/6 inhibitors palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib and estimated the number of patients with metastatic breast cancer who were eligible for these medicines compared with the actual use in clinical practice. The study used nationwide claims data that were obtained from the Dutch Hospital Data. Claims and early access data for patients with hormone receptor-positive and ERBB2 (formerly HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer who were treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors from November 1, 2016, to December 31, 2021, were included. IMPORTANCE The number of new cancer medicines that are being approved by regulatory agents is increasing exponentially. Yet little is known about the pace at which these medicines reach eligible patients in daily clinical practice during different phases of the postapproval access pathway. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Description of the postapproval access pathway, monthly number of patients who were treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors in clinical practice, and estimated number of patients who were eligible for treatment. Aggregated claims data were used, and patient characteristics and outcomes data were not collected. OBJECTIVE To describe the entire postapproval access pathway of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors in the Netherlands, from regulatory approval to reimbursement and to investigate the adoption of these medicines in clinical practice among patients with metastatic breast cancer. RESULTS Three CDK4/6 inhibitors have received European Union-wide regulatory approval for the treatment of HR-positive and ERBB2-negative metastatic breast cancer since November 2016. In the Netherlands, the number of patients who have been treated with these medicines increased to approximately 1847 (based on 1 624 665 claims over the entire study period) from approval to the end of 2021. Reimbursement for these medicines was granted between 9 and 11 months after approval. While awaiting reimbursement decisions, 492 patients received palbociclib, the first approved medicine of this class, via an expanded access program. By the end of the study period, 1616 patients (87%) were treated with palbociclib, whereas 157 patients (7%) received ribociclib, and 74 patients (4%) received abemaciclib. The CKD4/6 inhibitor was combined with an aromatase inhibitor in 708 patients (38%) and with fulvestrant in 1139 patients (62%). The pattern of use over time appeared to be somewhat lower compared with the estimated number of eligible patients (1847 vs 1915 in December 2021), especially in the first 2.5 years after approval.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianne Luyendijk
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hedwig Blommestein
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Carin Uyl-de Groot
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sabine Siesling
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Agnes Jager
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dane A, Ashraf S, Timmis J, Bos M, Uyl-de Groot C, van der Kuy PHM. Barriers to patient enrolment in phase III cancer clinical trials: interviews with clinicians and pharmaceutical industry representatives. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e055165. [PMID: 35177455 PMCID: PMC8860011 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Phase III cancer clinical trials are expensive and time-consuming phases in drug development. Effective patient enrolment can reduce delays and save costs, offering patients an opportunity to benefit from innovative treatments. However, the current evidence base does not fully explain the persistence of barriers to patient enrolment in phase III cancer clinical trials. The aim was to explore clinicians' and pharmaceutical representatives' views on these barriers. DESIGN A qualitative study was performed. In-depth information was collected from 15 experts in the field of oncology clinical trials, in particular clinical oncologists acting as principal investigators (PIs) and clinical research associates. By means of semistructured interviews, based on a questionnaire derived from our newly developed conceptual framework, they were asked to identify barriers to patient enrolment they had experienced and comment on barriers identified in literature. FINDINGS Existing knowledge on barriers to patient enrolment was confirmed by all interviewees. Two new key barriers to patient enrolment were identified, that is, insufficient attention to the importance of clinical trial-based research in medical training and a trust gap between PIs and pharmaceutical representatives. A third important barrier was increasingly narrow patient inclusion criteria. CONCLUSIONS The success rate of patient enrolment in phase III cancer clinical trials highly depends on the clinicians' willingness to take part in clinical trials. Raising awareness of the importance of clinical trials in medical training and among practising oncologists is recommended. Furthermore, to reduce barriers to patient enrolment, it is essential that both clinicians and pharmaceutical representatives acknowledge each other's expertise, become acquainted with each other's procedures and regulations, and work on building trust relationships. Finally, in accordance with our key findings, we propose to add two new barriers to our newly developed conceptual framework; insufficient attention to clinical trial research in medical training and trust gap.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aniek Dane
- Clinical Pharmacy, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Soedaba Ashraf
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - James Timmis
- Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Institute for Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Monique Bos
- Internal Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Carin Uyl-de Groot
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Luyendijk M, Blommestein H, Jager A, Siesling S, Uyl-de Groot C. Abstract P1-18-31: Accessibility of CDK4/6 inhibitors for breast cancer patients in the Netherlands. Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs21-p1-18-31] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Before new cancer drugs are available to patients, they must obtain regulatory approval by international authorities. In many countries new drugs are also subject to health technology assessment procedures to decide on the reimbursement. When these procedures are completed, new drugs need to be adopted into clinical practice. All these processes take time and may delay or hamper patient access. In this study we investigated the access to CDK4/6 inhibitors for HR+Her2- metastatic breast cancer patients in daily practice in the Netherlands and explored whether certain policy procedures may have influenced accessibility. Method: For this study we used a mixed method approach. For our qualitative analysis, we used publicly available documents describing drug approval and reimbursement decisions and clinical practice recommendations. Information from these documents were used to provide a timeline of procedures involved and decisions made to make CDK4/6 inhibitors available to patients in the Netherlands. For our quantitative analysis we used monthly prescription data to calculate the number of patients treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors each month, to describe the trends over time and to calculate annual drug expenses. The monthly number of patients treated were compared to an estimated number of patients eligible for the drugs as per European Medicine Association (EMA) label. The trends were compared to the decision timeline in order to identify as to whether certain procedures and/or decisions may have been associated with accessibility to CDK4/6 inhibitors in the Netherlands. Results: In June 2017, the first approved CDK4/6 inhibitor - palbociclib - was prescribed for breast cancer for the first time in the Netherlands. This was approximately 7 months after the EMA gave a positive opinion for marketing authorization. This delay was caused by pricing and reimbursement procedures which involved a thorough evaluation of the costs and effects of the drug and negotiations with the manufacturer. After prescribing palbociclib for the first time, the utilization of CDK4/6 inhibitors in clinical practice increased rapidly with a gradual increase from zero to approximately 1400 patients over a period of 30 months. The majority of patients were treated with palbociclib even after the approval of other drugs of this class (i.e. in December 2019: palbociclib 94% ribociclib 6% and abemaciclib <1%). In addition, approximately 63% of patients were treated with a CKD4/6 inhibitor combined with fulvestrant. The pattern of utilization over time appeared to correspond quite well to the estimated number of patients eligible but these estimates were surrounded by a substantial amount of uncertainty. The total expenses of the CDK4/6 inhibitors from 2017 to 2019 were approximately 3.5 times smaller than the estimates made by the health authorities in the Netherlands prior to the decision to reimburse the drugs. Conclusion: Pricing and reimbursement decisions caused a significant delay in access to the newest drugs for HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer. Nevertheless, after palbociclib - the first approved CDK4/6 inhibitor - received a positive reimbursement decision, the prescription in daily practice increased rapidly, a pattern not seen in the other drugs of this class. Though the number of patients treated appeared to be in line with the projected number of patients eligible for these drugs, detailed information regarding metastatic breast cancer patients, their treatments and the decision making process in daily practice is needed to fully understand access to the newest drugs.
Citation Format: Marianne Luyendijk, Hedwig Blommestein, Agnes Jager, Sabine Siesling, Carin Uyl-de Groot. Accessibility of CDK4/6 inhibitors for breast cancer patients in the Netherlands [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-18-31.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Agnes Jager
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bakker L, Aarts J, Uyl-de Groot C, Redekop K. How can we discover the most valuable types of big data and artificial intelligence-based solutions? A methodology for the efficient development of the underlying analytics that improve care. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2021; 21:336. [PMID: 34844594 PMCID: PMC8628451 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-021-01682-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2021] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Much has been invested in big data and artificial intelligence-based solutions for healthcare. However, few applications have been implemented in clinical practice. Early economic evaluations can help to improve decision-making by developers of analytics underlying these solutions aiming to increase the likelihood of successful implementation, but recommendations about their use are lacking. The aim of this study was to develop and apply a framework that positions best practice methods for economic evaluations alongside development of analytics, thereby enabling developers to identify barriers to success and to select analytics worth further investments. METHODS The framework was developed using literature, recommendations for economic evaluations and by applying the framework to use cases (chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL), intensive care, diabetes). First, the feasibility of developing clinically relevant analytics was assessed and critical barriers to successful development and implementation identified. Economic evaluations were then used to determine critical thresholds and guide investment decisions. RESULTS When using the framework to assist decision-making of developers of analytics, continuing development was not always feasible or worthwhile. Developing analytics for progressive CLL and diabetes was clinically relevant but not feasible with the data available. Alternatively, developing analytics for newly diagnosed CLL patients was feasible but continuing development was not considered worthwhile because the high drug costs made it economically unattractive for potential users. Alternatively, in the intensive care unit, analytics reduced mortality and per-patient costs when used to identify infections (- 0.5%, - €886) and to improve patient-ventilator interaction (- 3%, - €264). Both analytics have the potential to save money but the potential benefits of analytics that identify infections strongly depend on infection rate; a higher rate implies greater cost-savings. CONCLUSIONS We present a framework that stimulates efficiency of development of analytics for big data and artificial intelligence-based solutions by selecting those applications of analytics for which development is feasible and worthwhile. For these applications, results from early economic evaluations can be used to guide investment decisions and identify critical requirements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lytske Bakker
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
- Erasmus Centre for Health Economics Rotterdam (EsCHER), Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Jos Aarts
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Carin Uyl-de Groot
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus Centre for Health Economics Rotterdam (EsCHER), Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ken Redekop
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus Centre for Health Economics Rotterdam (EsCHER), Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bakker L, Aarts J, Uyl-de Groot C, Redekop W. Economic evaluations of big data analytics for clinical decision-making: a scoping review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021; 27:1466-1475. [PMID: 32642750 PMCID: PMC7526472 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2020] [Revised: 04/06/2020] [Accepted: 05/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Much has been invested in big data analytics to improve health and reduce costs. However, it is unknown whether these investments have achieved the desired goals. We performed a scoping review to determine the health and economic impact of big data analytics for clinical decision-making. MATERIALS AND METHODS We searched Medline, Embase, Web of Science and the National Health Services Economic Evaluations Database for relevant articles. We included peer-reviewed papers that report the health economic impact of analytics that assist clinical decision-making. We extracted the economic methods and estimated impact and also assessed the quality of the methods used. In addition, we estimated how many studies assessed "big data analytics" based on a broad definition of this term. RESULTS The search yielded 12 133 papers but only 71 studies fulfilled all eligibility criteria. Only a few papers were full economic evaluations; many were performed during development. Papers frequently reported savings for healthcare payers but only 20% also included costs of analytics. Twenty studies examined "big data analytics" and only 7 reported both cost-savings and better outcomes. DISCUSSION The promised potential of big data is not yet reflected in the literature, partly since only a few full and properly performed economic evaluations have been published. This and the lack of a clear definition of "big data" limit policy makers and healthcare professionals from determining which big data initiatives are worth implementing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lytske Bakker
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Netherlands.,Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jos Aarts
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Carin Uyl-de Groot
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Netherlands.,Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - William Redekop
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Netherlands.,Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
de Kleijn R, Uyl-de Groot C, Hagen C, Franssen C, Schraa J, Pasker-de Jong P, Ter Wee P. CHANGING NURSING CARE TIME AS AN EFFECT OF CHANGED CHARACTERISTICS OF THE DIALYSIS POPULATION. J Ren Care 2020; 46:161-168. [PMID: 32212255 DOI: 10.1111/jorc.12326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The population of dialysis patients is ageing. Dialysis nurses are confronted with geriatric patients with multiple comorbidities. Nurses are confronted with an increasing burden of care. OBJECTIVES The present study focused on the question of whether, over time, the increasing age and comorbidities of the haemodialysis population increased nursing care time. Furthermore, we studied potential changes in the predictors of the required nursing time. DESIGN Observational study. PARTICIPANTS A total of 980 dialysis patients from 12 dialysis centres were included. MEASUREMENTS Nurses filled out the classification tool for each patient and completed a form for reporting patient characteristics for groups of relevant haemodialysis patients at baseline and after 1 and four years. Changes in patient and dialysis characteristics were analysed, as well as the estimated nursing care time needed. RESULTS An increase in the nursing time needed for dialysis was largely due to decreased mobility, closing of the vascular access and a greater need for psychosocial attention and was most strongly present in incident dialysis patients. The time needed for dialysis decreased as patient participation increased and vascular access changed from catheters to fistulae. Over the four-year period, the average overall needed nursing care time per haemodialysis session did not change. CONCLUSIONS Our study shows that the average nursing time needed per patient did not change in the four-year observation period. However, more time is required for incident patients; thus, if a centre has high patient turnover, more nursing care time is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ria de Kleijn
- Department of Nephrology, Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Carin Uyl-de Groot
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Chris Hagen
- Dialysecentrum Midden Nederland, Meander Medisch Centrum, Amersfoort, Harderwijk, The Netherlands
| | - Casper Franssen
- Department of Nephrology, Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jeanette Schraa
- Ziekenhuis St. Jansdal and Dialysecentrum Midden Nederland, Harderwijk, The Netherlands
| | | | - Piet Ter Wee
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Zorgsupport and Nephrology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
de Kleijn R, Uyl-de Groot C, Hagen C, Diepenbroek A, Pasker-de Jong P, Ter Wee P. Differences in care burden of patients undergoing dialysis in different centres in the netherlands. J Ren Care 2017; 43:98-107. [PMID: 28244208 DOI: 10.1111/jorc.12193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A classification model was developed to simplify planning of personnel at dialysis centres. This model predicted the care burden based on dialysis characteristics. However, patient characteristics and different dialysis centre categories might also influence the amount of care time required. OBJECTIVE To determine if there is a difference in care burden between different categories of dialysis centres and if specific patient characteristics predict nursing time needed for patient treatment. DESIGN An observational study. PARTICIPANTS Two hundred and forty-two patients from 12 dialysis centres. MEASUREMENTS In 12 dialysis centres, nurses filled out the classification list per patient and completed a form with patient characteristics. Nephrologists filled out the Charlson Comorbidity Index. Independent observers clocked the time nurses spent on separate steps of the dialysis for each patient. Dialysis centres were categorised into four types. Data were analysed using regression models. RESULTS In contrast to other dialysis centres, academic centres needed 14 minutes more care time per patient per dialysis treatment than predicted in the classification model. No patient characteristics were found that influenced this difference. The only patient characteristic that predicted the time required was gender, with more time required to treat women. Gender did not affect the difference between measured and predicted care time. CONCLUSION Differences in care burden were observed between academic and other centres, with more time required for treatment in academic centres. Contribution of patient characteristics to the time difference was minimal. The only patient characteristics that predicted care time were previous transplantation, which reduced the time required, and gender, with women requiring more care time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ria de Kleijn
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Chris Hagen
- Dialysis Centre Midden Nederland, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, Harderwijk, Zeewolde, The Netherlands
| | - Adry Diepenbroek
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Piet Ter Wee
- Department of Nephrology, VU Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Malone DC, Berg NS, Claxton K, Garrison LP, IJzerman M, Marsh K, Neumann PJ, Sculpher M, Towse A, Uyl-de Groot C, Weinstein MC. International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research Comments on the American Society of Clinical Oncology Value Framework. J Clin Oncol 2016; 34:2936-7. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.64.4328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel C. Malone
- Colleges of Pharmacy and Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
| | - Nancy S. Berg
- International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, Lawrenceville, NJ
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Adrian Towse
- Office of Health Economics, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Nijdam W, Levendag P, Fuller D, Schulz R, Prévost JB, Noever I, Uyl-de Groot C. Robotic Radiosurgery vs. Brachytherapy as a Boost to Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy for Tonsillar Fossa and Soft Palate Tumors: The Clinical and Economic Impact of an Emerging Technology. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2016; 6:611-20. [DOI: 10.1177/153303460700600604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
As a basis for making decisions regarding optimal treatment for patients with tonsillar fossa and soft palate tumors, we conducted a preliminary investigation of costs and quality of life (QoL) for two modalities [brachytherapy (BT) and robotic radiosurgery] used to boost radiation to the primary tumors following external beam radiotherapy. BT was well established in our center; a boost by robotic radiosurgery was begun more recently in patients for whom BT was not technically feasible. Robotic radiosurgery boost treatment has the advantage of being non-invasive and is able to reach tumors in cases where there is deep parapharyngeal tumor extension. A neck dissection was performed for patients with nodal-positive disease. Quality of life (pain and difficulty swallowing) was established in long-term follow-up for patients undergoing BT and over a one-year follow-up in robotic radiosurgery patients. Total hospital costs for both groups were computed. Our results show that efficacy and quality of life at one year are comparable for BT and robotic radiosurgery. Total cost for robotic radiosurgery was found to be less than BT primarily due to the elimination of hospital admission and operating room expenses. Confirmation of robotic radiosurgery treatment efficacy and reduced morbidity in the long term requires further study. Quality of life and cost analyses are critical to Health Technology Assessments (HTA). The present study shows how a preliminary HTA of a new medical technology such as robotic radiosurgery with its typical hypofractionation characteristics might be based on short-term clinical outcomes and assumptions of equivalence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wideke Nijdam
- Department of Radiation-Oncology Erasmus Medical Center - Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center Groene Hilledijk 301 3075 EA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Peter Levendag
- Department of Radiation-Oncology Erasmus Medical Center - Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center Groene Hilledijk 301 3075 EA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Donald Fuller
- Radiation Medical Group San Diego CyberKnife Center 5395 Ruffin Road Suite 103 San Diego, CA 92123, USA
| | | | - Jean-Briac Prévost
- Department of Radiation-Oncology Erasmus Medical Center - Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center Groene Hilledijk 301 3075 EA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Inge Noever
- Department of Radiation-Oncology Erasmus Medical Center - Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center Groene Hilledijk 301 3075 EA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Carin Uyl-de Groot
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment (iMTA) Erasmus MC Rotterdam, PO Box 1738 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
de Kleijn R, Hagen C, Uyl-de Groot C, Pasker-de Jong P, Ter Wee P. Prediction of care burden of patients undergoing haemodialysis: development of a measuring tool. J Ren Care 2015; 41:119-25. [PMID: 25704066 DOI: 10.1111/jorc.12109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The ageing of the population and new options for therapy have led to an increase in the number of patients undergoing dialysis. Rising costs in health care and new financial structures impose funding constraints on dialysis departments and force the departments to deploy nurses more efficiently. Therefore, predicting the nursing time spent on the care of patients is important. OBJECTIVE Development of a classification tool to predict the burden of nursing care of patients undergoing dialysis. DESIGN Observational study. PARTICIPANTS 242 patients on dialysis in 12 centres. MEASUREMENTS The time spent on nursing care within predefined areas, including patient independence, vascular access, psychosocial support, dialysis complexity, communication and specific nursing actions, was measured by observers. Average times and their standard deviations (SD) were calculated. Variation of patient characteristics was analysed. RESULTS The average care time required for the four routine investigated domains, namely independence, vascular access, psychosocial support and dialysis complexity, was 59.23 (SD = 24.30) minutes per treatment per patient. CONCLUSION Our study shows that it is possible to predict the burden of nursing care of patients undergoing dialysis by means of a classification model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ria de Kleijn
- Dialysis Centre Midden Nederland, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, Harderwijk, Zeewolde, The Netherlands
| | - Chris Hagen
- Dialysis Centre Midden Nederland, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, Harderwijk, Zeewolde, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Piet Ter Wee
- Department Nefrologie, VU Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bouwmans C, Janssen J, Huijgens P, Uyl-de Groot C. Costs of haematological adverse events in chronic myeloid leukaemia patients: a retrospective cost analysis of the treatment of anaemia, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia. J Med Econ 2009; 12:164-9. [PMID: 19606951 DOI: 10.3111/13696990903149479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The study aim was to assess costs of haematological adverse events (AE) related to pharmacologic treatment of chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) patients. METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study using patient records of adults (n=91) with chronic-phase CML treated at a single university medical centre in the Netherlands. Occurrence of grade III/IV haematological AEs, defined according to CTC-NCI guidelines criteria, was derived from the laboratory registration. Mean age at time of diagnosis was 48 years; 56% male. A healthcare perspective was adopted. Cost estimates are presented in 2006 euros. RESULTS Average cost of an episode of anaemia was 1,572 euro, of thrombocytopenia 2,955 euro, and of neutropenia 1,152 euro. The mean cost of febrile neutropenia amounted to 2,462 euro. CONCLUSIONS Treatment costs of AEs varied considerably. However, apart from the cost of anaemia, the results presented seem to be in line with information from the international literature. The key limitations of the study concern the relatively small cohort of patients at a single centre, the retrospective design and the various treatment regimens of CML during the follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clazien Bouwmans
- Erasmus MC, Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Krol M, Koopman M, Uyl-de Groot C, Punt CJA. A systematic review of economic analyses of pharmaceutical therapies for advanced colorectal cancer. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2007; 8:1313-28. [PMID: 17563265 DOI: 10.1517/14656566.8.9.1313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is one of the most common causes of cancer in the Western world. New drugs in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer, such as irinotecan and oxaliplatin, have substantially increased the cost of treatment. A systematic literature review on the cost (-effectiveness) of pharmaceutical therapies for advanced colorectal cancer was conducted, in which 13 articles were included. The main topics were: orally versus intravenously administered fluoropyrimidine, raltitrexed, irinotecan and oxaliplatin. Additional information was collected on the cost (-effectiveness) of the monoclonal antibodies, cetuximab and bevacizumab. Only five articles had taken the societal perspective, in most articles no data on quality of life was presented, and only two reported the cost per quality-adjusted life year. As only a limited amount of information is available on the cost-effectiveness of pharmaceutical therapies for advanced colorectal cancer, there is a need for more cost-effectiveness studies. These studies are preferably performed by taking a societal perspective and including quality of life outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marieke Krol
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus Medical Centre, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Nijdam W, Levendag P, Noever I, Groot CUD, Agthoven MV. Cancer in the oropharynx: cost calculation of different treatment modalities for controlled primaries, relapses and grade III/IV complications. Radiother Oncol 2005; 77:65-72. [PMID: 16213619 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2005.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2004] [Revised: 04/01/2005] [Accepted: 09/08/2005] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE This paper presents a model for cost calculation using the different treatment modalities for oropharyngeal (OPh) cancers used in our hospital. We compared full hospital costs, the associated costs of localregional relapses (LRR) and/or treatment related grade III/IV complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with OPh cancer are treated in the Erasmus MC preferably by an organ function preservation protocol. That is, by external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) followed by a brachytherapy (BT) boost, and neck dissection in case of N+ disease (BT-group: 157 patients). If BT is not feasible, resection with postoperative EBRT (S-group [S=Surgery]: 110 patients) or EBRT-alone (EBRT-group: 77 patients) is being pursued. Actuarial localregional control (LRC), disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) at 5-years were calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier method. The mean costs per treatment group for diagnosis, primary Tx per se, follow-up, (salvage of) locoregional relapse (LRR), distant metastasis (DM), and/or grade III/IV complications needing clinical admission, were computed. RESULTS For the BT-, S-, or EBRT treatment groups, LRC rates at 5-years were 85, 82, and 55%, for the DFS, 61, 48, and 43%, and for the OS 65, 52, and 40%, respectively. The mean costs of primary Tx in case of the BT-group is 13,466; for the S-group 24,219, and 12,502 for the EBRT-group. The mean costs of S (the main salvage modality) for a LRR of the BT group or EBRT-group, were 17,861 and 15,887, respectively. The mean costs of clinical management of Grade III/IV complications were 7184 (BT-group), 16,675 (S-group) and 6437 (EBRT-group). CONCLUSION The clinical outcome illustrates excellent LRC rates at 5-years for BT (85%), as well as for S (82%). The relatively low 55% LRC rate at 5-years for EBRT probably reflects a negative selection of patients. It is of interest that the total mean costs of patients alive with no evidence of disease is least for the BT-group: 15,101 as opposed to 25,288 (S) and 18,674 (EBRT). Main underlying cause for the high costs with S as opposed to RT alone is the number of associated clinical admission days, not only during primary treatment, but also at relapse. This might be taken into consideration when treating these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wideke Nijdam
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Erasmus MC, Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Braaksma M, van Agthoven M, Nijdam W, Uyl-de Groot C, Levendag P. Costs of treatment intensification for head and neck cancer: Concomitant chemoradiation randomised for radioprotection with amifostine. Eur J Cancer 2005; 41:2102-11. [PMID: 16140526 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2005] [Revised: 05/06/2005] [Accepted: 05/13/2005] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
This study presents an overview of costs of a chemoradiation protocol in head and neck cancer patients and an analysis of whether prevention of acute toxicity with amifostine results in a reduction to costs. Fifty-four patients treated with weekly paclitaxel concomitant with radiation were randomised for treatment with subcutaneously administered amifostine (500 mg) and analysed with respect to costs of treatment. Total costs for work-up, treatment and toxicity were calculated per treatment arm. No significant differences were found between treatment arms in preliminary results regarding response (98%), toxicity and 2-year survival (77%). Average costs for toxicity were Euro 3.789, largely influenced by hospital admissions (Euro 3.013). Total costs for amifostine administration amounted to Euro 6.495 per patient. The average total costs of treatment were Euro 19.647 versus Euro 13.592 with or without amifostine, respectively. The applied (subcutaneous) dose of amifostine appeared to be insufficient for radioprotection and reduction of related costs in the concomitant chemoradiation scheme, whereas total costs increased remarkably. Although it would be accompanied by a further cost raise, applying a higher amifostine dose might reduce (mucosal) toxicity and therefore in the long run lower related costs for hospital admission and tube feeding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marijel Braaksma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center-Daniel den Hoed, Groene Hilledijk 301, 3075 EA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Doorduijn J, Buijt I, Holt B, Steijaert M, Uyl-de Groot C, Sonneveld P. Self-reported quality of life in elderly patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma treated with CHOP chemotherapy. Eur J Haematol 2005; 75:116-23. [PMID: 16000127 DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2005.00438.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
We studied the impact of CHOP chemotherapy on the quality of life (QoL) of elderly patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). 132 patients aged 65 or older, who participated in a randomized, multicenter trial, completed QoL questionnaires (EuroQol-5D, EORTC QLQ-C30 and MFI-20) on 8 predefined time-points before, during and following treatment. At baseline, QoL was significantly better on almost all dimensions in patients with a lower compared to patients with a higher age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (aaPI). During treatment, physical and role functioning and global QoL deteriorated and fatigue increased in the lower aaPI group, whereas QoL of the higher aaPI group remained stable. During follow-up, the QoL was significantly better for patients in complete response (CR) or partial remission (PR) than for patients with progression/relapse. Soon after completion of therapy, the QoL of the lower aaPI group returned to pretreatment levels or better, while patients with higher aaPI showed a significant improvement in QoL compared to baseline levels. The effect of CHOP on the quality of life of elderly patients could be used in counseling this group of patients.
Collapse
|
20
|
Nijdam W, Levendag P, Noever I, Uyl-de Groot C, van Agthoven M. Cost analysis comparing brachytherapy versus surgery for primary carcinoma of the tonsillar fossa and/or soft palate. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004; 59:488-94. [PMID: 15145167 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2003] [Revised: 10/21/2003] [Accepted: 11/10/2003] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Locoregional control rates, late normal tissue sequelae, and functional outcome scores have not been different for tonsillar fossa and/or soft palate tumors treated by either brachytherapy (BT) or surgery in an organ function preservation protocol. For additional prioritizing in clinical decision-making, we focused on a comparison of the full hospital costs of the different treatment options. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between 1986 and 2001, tonsillar fossa and/or soft palate tumors were treated by external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) to the primary tumor and neck, followed by fractionated BT to the primary. Neck dissection (ND) was performed for node-positive disease (BT group; 104 patients). If BT was not feasible, resection combined with postoperative EBRT was executed (surgery group; 86 patients). Locoregional control, disease-free survival, and overall survival were calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier method. The performance status scales, late side effects, and degree of xerostomia have been previously reported. This paper focused on the hospital and follow-up costs for the treatment groups EBRT and BT with or without ND compared with surgery followed by postoperative RT (PORT). Finally, these costs were also computed for future treatment strategies (e.g., better sparing of normal tissues by intensity-modulated RT [IMRT]). RESULTS Locoregional control, disease-free survival, and overall survival rate at 5 years for patients treated with EBRT and BT with or without ND vs. surgery plus PORT was 80% vs. 78%, 58% vs. 55%, and 67% vs. 57%, respectively. The major late side effect was xerostomia. Dry mouth syndrome affected the BT group and surgery group equally. The total costs for all treatment groups were 14,262 euro (BT group), 16,628 euro (BT plus ND group), 18,782 euro (surgery plus PORT group), 14,532 euro (IMRT group), and 16,897 euro (IMRT plus ND group). CONCLUSION Excellent locoregional tumor control was observed with either modality, with no statistically significant differences in the incidence of the most noted side effect xerostomia. The total costs for BT were less than for surgery: 16,628 euro (19,452 dollars) for EBRT plus BT plus ND vs. 18,782 euro(22,074 dollars) for surgery plus PORT. To reduce the morbidity of xerostomia, we propose further optimizing our organ function preservation protocol by implementing IMRT as a more conformal, tissue-sparing, RT technique. This is of particular interest because the costs of IMRT plus ND (16,897 euro; 19,767 dollars) were not very different from those for BT plus ND (16,628 euro; 19,452 dollars) and were far less than the costs for surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wideke Nijdam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|