Design, Analysis and Experimental Validation of a Novel 7-Degrees of Freedom Instrument for Laparoscopic Surgeries

A review of wrist mechanism design and the application in gastrointestinal minimally invasive surgery of multi-degree-of-freedom surgical laparoscopic instruments

BACKGROUND

This paper aims to comprehensively review current designs of Multi-degree-of-freedom (Multi-DOF) wrist mechanisms and the applications of Multi-DOF surgical instruments in gastrointestinal minimally invasive surgery (MIS).

METHODS

By reviewing the advantages and limitations of traditional laparoscopic and robotic surgical instruments, we present the development of Multi-DOF surgical instruments. Then, we summarize the Multi-DOF wrist mechanisms, delineating their pros and cons. Finally, the surgical outcomes and efficiency of Multi-DOF surgical instruments are reviewed.

RESULTS

The utilization of Multi-DOF surgical instruments for both benign and malignant gastrointestinal diseases demonstrates perioperative outcomes comparable to traditional laparoscopic and robotic surgeries. In certain aspects, it exhibits advantages such as shorter operative times and faster gastrointestinal function recovery.

CONCLUSION

Further research is needed to effectively combine these driving mechanisms to achieve a new type of transmission mechanism with high rigidity and precision, ample working space, and decoupled degrees of freedom. Multi-DOF surgical instruments offer the advantages of high flexibility and lower costs, displaying good feasibility and safety in practical clinical applications within gastrointestinal surgery. Their promotion in primary care hospitals could benefit a larger patient population. However, more extensive sample-sized multicenter studies are still warranted to elucidate such surgical instruments' advantages further.

ArtiSential laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparative analysis with robotic single-port cholecystectomy

Purpose

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the gold standard procedure for benign gallbladder disease. However, reducing ports still causes frustration when using various instruments. We investigated early perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic single site + 1 cholecystectomy using ArtiSential instruments (ArtiSential laparoscopic cholecystectomy [ALC], LIVSMED).

Methods

From July 2022 to December 2022, 116 patients underwent ALC in Severance Hospital and Yongin Severance Hospital. From May 2019 to December 2022, 210 patients underwent robotic single-port cholecystectomy (RSPC). We compared clinical characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and postoperative pain scores between the ALC and RSPC groups.

Results

Patients in the ALC group were significantly older than those in the RSPC group (51.9 years vs. 43.9 years, P < 0.001), and the ALC group had a larger proportion of male patients (50.9% vs. 24.8%, P < 0.001) and cases of acute cholecystitis with stones (21.6% vs. 0.5%, P < 0.001) than the RSPC group. The groups did not differ in their estimated blood loss, postoperative complications, or hospital stays. The mean operation time of the ALC group was shorter than that of the RSPC group (56.5 minutes vs. 94.8 minutes, P < 0.001). Although the pain scores reported on discharge day did not differ, the ALC group reported significantly lower immediate postoperative pain scores than the RSPC group (2.7 vs. 5.4, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

ALC is a safe and feasible procedure. ALC patients reported markedly lower immediate postoperative pain scores than RSPC patients, with comparable operative outcomes for estimated blood loss, hospital stay, and postoperative complication rates.

Biochemical implications of robotic surgery: a new frontier in the operating room

Robotic surgery represents a milestone in surgical procedures, offering advantages such as less invasive methods, elimination of tremors, scaled motion, and 3D visualization. This in-depth analysis explores the complex biochemical effects of robotic methods. The use of pneumoperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg positioning can decrease pulmonary compliance and splanchnic perfusion while increasing hypercarbia. However, robotic surgery reduces surgical stress and inflammation by minimizing tissue trauma. This contributes to faster recovery but may limit immune function. Robotic procedures also limit ischemia-reperfusion injury and oxidative damage compared to open surgery. They also help preserve native antioxidant defenses and coagulation. In a clinical setting, robotic procedures reduce blood loss, pain, complications, and length of stay compared to traditional procedures. However, risks remain, including device failure, the need for conversion to open surgery and increased costs. On the oncology side, there is still debate about margins, recurrence, and long-term survival. The advent of advanced technologies, such as intraoperative biosensors, localized drug delivery systems, and the incorporation of artificial intelligence, may further improve the efficiency of robotic surgery. However, ethical dilemmas regarding patient consent, privacy, access, and regulation of this disruptive innovation need to be addressed. Overall, this review sheds light on the complex biochemical implications of robotic surgery and highlights areas that require additional mechanistic investigation. It presents a comprehensive approach to responsibly maximize the potential of robotic surgery to improve patient outcomes, integrating technical skill with careful consideration of physiological and ethical issues.

Literature Review of Handheld Articulating Instruments in Minimally Invasive Surgery

Background: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) using handheld articulating instruments (HAIs) has emerged as an innovative approach, offering enhanced dexterity and accessibility compared with conventional straight tools. There has been a significant surge in market interest surrounding HAIs. However, the question about the potential benefits of these devices for surgeons and patients in clinical applications remains unclear. Methods: We thoroughly searched relevant literature about the HAIs with clinical applications. This article reviews the feasibility, safety, outcomes, ergonomics, and learning curve associated with utilizing HAIs, including notable commercial products FlexDex, ArtiSential, and HandX. This study also investigates the comparisons of the use of HAIs with traditional laparoscopy and the da Vinci robotic system in terms of surgical outcomes and operational efficiency. Results: Early clinical studies demonstrate the applicability of HAIs across gastrointestinal, urologic, cardiothoracic, and general surgery, with promising results and few complications reported. Comparisons with conventional laparoscopy reveal no significant differences in surgical outcomes. However, HAIs present a more prolonged learning curve than robotic surgery for novice users. Combining three-dimensional visualization techniques facilitate performance. Further research with larger sample sizes is warranted to establish definitive superiority in surgical efficiency and characterize optimal training methodology. Conclusions: Overall, the maneuverability and lower cost of HAIs present new possibilities in MIS, potentially expanding accessibility for smaller health care organizations and benefiting more patients.

Surgeon perception of factors affecting the efficiency of conventional and robotic laparoscopy: A Pan India study

Background

Laparoscopic surgery, being minimally invasive, offers many benefits including faster patient recovery, reduced scarring and lower mortality rate. It is, however, technically challenging and requires a long learning curve. These issues can be overcome by Robot-Assisted Surgery (RAS) systems, which incorporate computer-controlled motions enabling enhanced precision and accuracy.

Methods

This study involves identifying and verifying various difficulties related to laparoscopy and the role of RAS in their mitigation. It involved 93 surgeons across India, covering a range of demographics, medical specialties and experience. They were interviewed to understand the current status and to compare RAS with conventional laparoscopy. The questionnaire developed for the purpose tests a set of hypotheses related to instruments, comfort, and other factors derived from the available literature as well as inputs from leading laparoscopy surgeons and domain experts.

Results

A grading system was adopted to evaluate the hypotheses based on the surgeons' responses. A statistical method based on T-test was employed to gain useful inferences from the study. The results showed that early-career surgeons preferred haptic enabled systems. As the experience of the surgeon increases, tissue identification becomes easier, thereby reducing the need for haptic feedback-enabled instruments.

Conclusions

The surgeons from across the demographics were strongly in the favour of the need for articulated instruments with surgeon-controlled camera systems. They reported a reduction in physical and mental discomfort during surgical procedures using RAS. They also confirmed the similarity in patient outcomes for both conventional laparoscopy and RAS. These insights are expected to be interesting and useful for further research and development in this field.