The Anal Sex Stigma Scales: A New Measure of Sexual Stigma Among Cisgender Men Who have Sex with Men

Anatomic maps of erogenous and aversive sensation zones of the breasts, vulva, and vagina: a questionnaire-based study

BACKGROUND

Erogenous sensation zones (ESZs) elicit sexual pleasure upon stimulation. General ESZ maps exist, but they do not assess internal areas of the body, differentiate between individual structures, or quantify the importance of individual ESZs to sexual pleasure. Maps of aversive sensation zones (ASZs), or bodily areas individuals dislike having touched during sex, have not been described.

AIM

To create detailed erogenous and aversive sensory maps of the vulva, vagina, and breasts, and assess the importance of each erogenous structure to sexual pleasure.

METHODS

An anonymous online questionnaire was administered to 441 sexually active cisgender women (mean age 48.9 ± 15.5 years) from March to June 2020 via Qualtrics. Respondents selected ESZs and ASZs from anatomic illustrations and rated each ESZ's importance to their sexual pleasure. Respondents' reasoning for choosing each ASZ was queried.

OUTCOMES

Heat maps of ESZ and ASZ selection frequency, ESZ importance ratings, and ASZ reasoning.

RESULTS

More respondents selected ≧1 areas of the vulva as erogenous (82.0%), in comparison to the breasts (77.4%) and vagina (59.4%). The two most erogenous areas of the breast were also the most aversive: breast tissue (57.8% ESZ selection; 5.4% ASZ) and nipples (42.7%; 6.5%). Respondents most commonly reported these areas as aversive due to: "It's overly sensitive" and "It hurts."The most frequently selected ESZs of the vulva were the vaginal introitus (50.8%), periurethra (42.6%), and glans clitoris (41.3%). The top ASZs were the anus (34.0%) and perineum (7.9%), with primary reasons being: "It's gross," "It hurts," and "I'm ashamed/embarrassed."Of the five ESZs of the vagina, the superficial anterior (48.1%) and superficial posterior (32.9%) regions were the most selected. The cervix (6.8%), superficial posterior (5%), and deep posterior (3.4%) regions were the top ASZs due to "It hurts" and/or "It's overly sensitive."

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Erogenous and aversive sensory maps could help identify sexual concerns, inform preoperative counseling, and track sensory changes.

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS

This study captured detailed maps of internal and external ESZs and ASZs of the breasts, vulva, and vagina. Limitations include recall bias and inclusion of only cisgender women, rather than all people who share the same anatomy, irrespective of gender identity.

CONCLUSIONS

Erogenous sensation was most prominent in the vulvar structures, including the vaginal introitus and glans clitoris, followed by the superficial surface of the vaginal canal. Aversive sensation associated with the anus primarily came from feelings of judgment and shame, while other ASZs were reportedly due to pain and sensitivity.

Measuring sexual behavior stigma among cisgender men who have sex with men: an assessment of cross-country measurement invariance

Objectives

Globally, cisgender men who have sex with men experience sexual stigma, but limited investigation of cross-population scale performance hinder comparisons. As measurement invariance is a necessary but seldom-established criterion of valid cross-cultural comparisons, we assessed invariance in scales of stigma related to sexual behavior across 9 countries.

Methods

This secondary analysis used data collected from adult (mean age=29.6, standard deviation=12.5) cisgender men who have sex with men (n=8,669) in studies from 6 West African, 2 Southern African, and 1 North American country from 2012-2016. A common item set assessed 2 sexual behavior stigma domains. A sequential process was used to test the factor structure and measurement invariance, which included multigroup confirmatory factor analyses (CFA). Individual countries, items, living with HIV, and disclosure were explored as possible sources of noninvariance.

Results

Goodness-of-fit statistics indicated adequate fit of the same 2-factor model in 7 of the 9 countries. The chi2 difference test comparing a constrained and unconstrained 7-country model in which loadings and thresholds were freely estimated was significant (p<0.001), indicating metric and scalar noninvariance, but removing the US provided evidence of invariance and freeing certain items led to a finding of partial invariance. Sexuality disclosure exhibited a direct relationship with select stigma items in several countries.

Conclusions

Our findings point to the utility of the two stigma scale dimensions in making cross-country comparisons, but also to the necessity of assessing invariance with explicit attention to several factors including differential disclosure of sexuality across contexts to ensure valid comparisons.

Shared Decision-Making Concerning Anal Cancer Screening in Persons With Human Immunodeficiency Virus

BACKGROUND

Anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (aHSIL) is the immediate precursor of anal cancer. Anal cytology is a recommended screening test to identify aHSIL among people with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV; PWH). Heterogeneity of risk for invasive anal cancer among PWH suggests the value of a shared decision-making framework regarding screening.

METHODS

Using a longitudinal HIV cohort with a comprehensive anal cancer screening program, we estimated the adjusted probabilities of having aHSIL on the first anal cytology. We used logistic regression models with inverse probability weighting to account for differential screening in the cohort and to construct a predicted probability nomogram for aHSIL. Sensitivity analysis was performed to estimate aHSIL prevalence corrected for misclassification bias.

RESULTS

Of 8139 PWH under care between 2007 and 2020, 4105 (49.8%) underwent at least 1 anal cytology test. First-time cytology aHSIL was present in 502 (12.2%) PWH. The adjusted probability of having aHSIL varied from 5% to 18% depending on patient characteristics. Prespecified factors in the aHSIL prediction model included nadir CD4 cell count, ethnicity, race, age, sex, gender identity, and HIV risk factors. The ability of the model to discriminate cytological aHSIL was modest, with an area under the curve of 0.63 (95% confidence interval, .60-.65).

CONCLUSIONS

PWH are at increased risk for aHSIL and invasive anal cancer. Risk, however, varies by patient characteristics. Individual risk factor profiles predictive of aHSIL can be modeled and operationalized as nomograms to facilitate shared decision-making conversations concerning anal cancer screening.

A novel "HIV salience and Perception" scale is associated with PrEP dispensing and adherence among adolescent girls and young women in Kampala, Uganda

Low perceived HIV risk is a barrier to effective pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use among African adolescent girls and young women (AGYW). Single-item risk perception measures are stigmatizing and alienating to AGYW and may not predict PrEP use. There is a need for a tool capturing domains of perceived HIV risk and salience that align with PrEP use among AGYW. This HIV PrEP study was conducted in Kampala, Uganda. We developed and piloted the 9-item "HIV Salience and Perception" (HPS) scale (range: 9-36); higher scores indicate beliefs of higher vulnerability to HIV. We administered the scale to Ugandan AGYW participating in an ongoing cohort study at enrollment, one, three and six months. PrEP dispensing was measured quarterly and adherence was measured daily via Wisepill (high adherence: ≥80% of expected pill bottle openings). We assessed scale performance and used generalized estimating equations to determine associations between scale score and PrEP use. Among 499 AGYW, 54.1% of our sample was ≥ 20 years (range:16-25). The median HPS score was 18 (range:8-33; α = 0.77). Higher score was associated with PrEP dispensing (aRR = 1.07 per point increase; 95% CI = 1.01-1.13; p-value = 0.02) in the overall cohort and among only those ≥ 20 years (aRR = 1.10; 95% CI = 1.03-1.19; p-value = 0.01). We did not observe an association between scale score and PrEP adherence. AGYW scoring higher on a novel HPS scale were more likely to initiate and obtain PrEP refills through 6 months. This scale may capture drivers of PrEP dispensing and could inform PrEP delivery and counseling for AGYW.

Sexual Role Identity and Anal Sex Positioning among Brazilian, Colombian, and Dominican Immigrant Sexual Minority Men

Sexual role identities for anal sex and anal sex positionings are often conflated in research. This study aimed to identify profiles of sexual minority men based on sexual role identity and anal sex positioning and determine correlates of these profiles, including individual (i.e., HIV-status identity, condom use, partner type, sexual orientation) and cultural (i.e., same-race partnering, country of birth, acculturation) factors. A sample of Brazilian, Colombian, and Dominican immigrant sexual minority men (n = 480) living in New York City were surveyed about identity and positioning at the two most recent encounters. Individual and cultural factors were examined as correlates of profiles identified through latent class analysis. Four latent classes were identified: No Labels (12%), Receptive Bottoms (16%), Insertive Tops (23%), Insertive and Receptive Versatiles (49%). We found a concordance rate of ~70% between identity and behavior. A proportion (12%) of behaviorally versatile men chose not to use sexual role labels. Living with HIV was associated with receptive and versatile classes, sex with main partners was associated with versatility, and sexual orientation differed across classes. Identity and behavior should not be used interchangeably in research or applied domains, particularly given the complexities of versatility and men who prefer to not use labels.

The Inventory of Anal Sex Knowledge (iASK): A New Measure of Sexual Health Knowledge Among Adolescent Sexual Minority Males

INTRODUCTION

Knowledge about sexual health is a key determinant of sexual behavior among adolescent sexual minority males (ASMM). No measures exist to assess anal sex knowledge, even though anal sex is the primary route by which ASMM acquire sexually transmitted infections (STIs), including a disproportionate burden of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).

AIM

We developed a new measure as a first step toward assessing the prevalence and correlates of anal sex knowledge and potential effects of interventions to improve knowledge.

METHODS

Two coders independently outlined domains of knowledge within 2 sex education videos designed to address anal sex knowledge among ASMM. An initial set of 56 items, some duplicative, encompassed all domains. A larger team, including a psychometrician, then iteratively revised and reduced the set of items, and assessed construct validity via cognitive testing among ASMM (N = 4, aged 16-17 years old, 75% identifying as racial/ethnic minorities). For the final set of 10 items, factor structure and convergent and divergent validity were assessed using baseline responses to an online survey within a randomized controlled pilot trial among 154 ASMM. Open-ended questions assessed their comprehension and the acceptability of items.

OUTCOMES

We examined correlates that we anticipated would be theoretically related (ie, the HIV Knowledge Questionnaire [HIV-KQ-18] and the STD-Knowledge Questionnaire [STD-KQ]) and theoretically distinct (ie, the Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-2], Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale [GAD-2], and employment status).

RESULTS

The one-factor model explained 42% of the items' common variance and demonstrated acceptable internal reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.72). The measure withstood tests of convergent and divergent validity when compared to current measures (HIV knowledge, r = 0.35 and STI knowledge, r = 0.24, both P < .05; internalizing mental health symptoms, r = -0.07 and employment status, r = 0.13, both P > .05). Few respondents found words unfamiliar or uncomfortable.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

A method for assessing anal sex knowledge may offer opportunities to intervene to lessen harmful sequelae of a lack of knowledge.

STRENGTH & LIMITATIONS

We developed a brief, psychometrically valid measure of anal sex knowledge. The measure may neither generalize to all anal health knowledge nor to more sexually experienced, older SMM.

CONCLUSION

The resulting 10-item, single-factor measure, the Inventory of Anal Sex Knowledge (iASK), is psychometrically sound and addresses the lack of anal sex knowledge measures among ASMM. The iASK can function to assess the prevalence and sequelae of anal sex knowledge among ASMM as well as the impact of interventions targeting anal sex knowledge. Kutner BA, Perry N, Stout C, et al. The Inventory of Anal Sex Knowledge (iASK): A New Measure of Sexual Health Knowledge Among Adolescent Sexual Minority Males. J Sex Med 2022;19:521-528.

Gay and Bisexual Men Who Report Anal Sex Stigma Alongside Discomfort Discussing Anal Sex with Health Workers Are Less Likely to Have Ever Received an Anal Examination or Anal Swab

Purpose: We sought to determine whether stigma toward anal sexuality was associated with having ever received an anal examination or anal swab among gay and bisexual men (GBM). Methods: In 2017, we conducted a cross-sectional online survey with 1513 adult cisgender GBM living in the United States. We used structural equation modeling to test whether the Anal Sex Stigma Scales (a validated measure comprising provider stigma, self-stigma, and silence) was negatively associated with lifetime receipt of anorectal examination or anal swabbing by a medical provider. The model assessed mediation by respondents' comfort discussing anal sex practices with health workers and adjusted for possible confounders. Results: As hypothesized, anal sex stigma was associated with less comfort discussing anal sex (β = -0.44, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.50 to -0.38, p < 0.001), and greater comfort was associated with greater likelihood of screening (β = 0.28, 95% CI: 0.19 to 0.37, p < 0.001). The model demonstrated good fit (root mean square error of approximation = 0.045, comparative fit index, and Tucker-Lewis index each = 0.99) and adjusted for everyday discrimination, social support specific to anal sex, age, income, education, medical coverage, outness, and ethnic/racial identification. Collectively, model variables accounted for 48% of the variance in screening (p < 0.001). Conclusion: GBM who endorsed less anal sex stigma reported greater comfort discussing anal sex with health workers and were more likely to have ever received anal health screening by a medical provider. To improve anal health and cancer prevention among GBM, anal sex stigma and related discomfort discussing anal sex with health workers are targets for intervention.

Age, sex, and other demographic trends in sexual behavior in the United States: Initial findings of the sexual behaviors, internet use, and psychological adjustment survey

It remains unclear how the seemingly ubiquitous use of the internet impacts user's offline personal relationships, particularly those that are romantic or sexual. Therefore, we conducted a national online survey to better understand the associations among internet use, sexual behavior, and adjustment called the Sexual Behaviors, Internet Use, and Psychological Adjustment Survey (SIPS). Here, we report patterns of sexual behavior in a sample of adults (N = 1987; ages 18-70) in the United States to establish its representativeness and consistency with similar recent surveys. We found age- and sex-related trends in oral, vaginal, and anal sex in terms of prevalence, frequency, number of partners, and age of initiation consistent with prior studies. We also detected differences in sexual behaviors based on relationship status and sexual orientation, but small and relatively few significant differences across racial and ethnic groups. The results confirm and expand upon trends identified in prior national surveys of sexual behavior, establishing the representativeness of the SIPS sample for use in future research examining the links among sexual behaviors and romantic relationships, internet use, and adjustment.

Does Stigma Toward Anal Sexuality Impede HIV Prevention Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in the United States? A Structural Equation Modeling Assessment

INTRODUCTION

Men who have sex with men (MSM) are suboptimally engaged in efficacious HIV interventions, due in part to stigma.

AIM

We sought to validate the Anal Health Stigma Model, developed based on theory and prior qualitative data, by testing the magnitude of associations between measures of anal sex stigma and engagement in HIV prevention practices, while adjusting for covariates.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional online survey of 1,263 cisgender MSM living in the United States and analyzed data with structural equation modeling. We tested a direct path from Anal Sex Stigma to Engagement in HIV Prevention alongside 2 indirect paths, 1 through Anal Sex Concerns and another through Comfort Discussing Anal Sexuality with Health Workers. The model adjusted for Social Support, Everyday Discrimination, and Sociodemographics.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Engagement in HIV Prevention comprised an ad hoc measure of (i) lifetime exposure to a behavioral intervention, (ii) current adherence to biomedical intervention, and (iii) consistent use of a prevention strategy during recent penile-anal intercourse.

RESULTS

In the final model, anal sex stigma was associated with less engagement (β = -0.22, P < .001), mediated by participants' comfort talking about anal sex practices with health workers (β = -0.52; β = 0.44; both P < .001), adjusting for covariates (R2 = 67%; χ2/df = 2.98, root mean square error of approximation = 0.040, comparative fit index = 0.99 and Tucker-Lewis index = 0.99). Sex-related concerns partially mediated the association between stigma and comfort (β = 0.55; β = 0.14, both P < .001). Modification indices also supported total effects of social support on increased comfort discussing anal sex (β = 0.35, P < .001) and, to a lesser degree, on decreased sex-related concerns (β = -0.10; P < .001).

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Higher stigma toward anal sexuality is associated with less engagement in HIV prevention, largely due to discomfort discussing anal sex practices with health workers.

STRENGTH & LIMITATIONS

Adjustment for mediation in a cross-sectional design cannot establish temporal causality. Self-report is vulnerable to social desirability and recall bias. Online samples may not represent cisgender MSM in general. However, findings place HIV- and health-related behaviors within a social and relational context and may suggest points for intervention in health-care settings.

CONCLUSION

Providers' willingness to engage in discussion about anal sexuality, for example, by responding to questions related to sexual well-being, may function as social support and thereby bolster comfort and improve engagement in HIV prevention. Kutner BA, Simoni JM, King KM, et al. Does Stigma Toward Anal Sexuality Impede HIV Prevention Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in the United States? A Structural Equation Modeling Assessment. J Sex Med 2020;17:477-490.