Frequency, Level, and Rate of Improvement for Treatment Targets in a Children’s Mental Health Community-Based Intensive In-Home Therapeutic Setting

Supporting Clinicians in Implementing Exposure Therapy for Anxiety and Related Disorders

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Exposure therapy is the gold standard treatment for anxiety and related disorders. Despite its strong evidence, it is rarely delivered in routine clinical settings. A growing body of literature has identified factors that impede delivery of exposure therapy and strategies that can increase its use. This review of research from the past 5 years: (1) summarizes barriers to delivering exposure; (2) identifies evidence-based strategies to support clinicians in increasing their delivery of exposure; and (3) highlights emerging trends and challenges in supporting clinicians to use exposure.

RECENT FINDINGS

Barriers to delivering exposure occur at the clinician, client, and organizational levels. Clinician training and organizational policies need to directly address multi-level barriers to support clinicians in using exposure. Technology-related considerations (e.g., virtual reality, telehealth) should be considered and clinicians should receive support from others (e.g., bachelor's-level providers; family peer navigators) to address increasing rates of anxiety disorders.

Higher treatment focus diffusion in Multisystemic Therapy is associated with less functional improvement over the course of treatment

PURPOSE

Treatment focus diffusion (TFD), dividing focus across multiple concerns during treatment, is common in public mental health care and differs from the more narrowly focused empirically supported treatments for youth reported in the literature. The present study examined whether and to what extent TFD is associated with youth functional improvement over the course of therapy.

METHOD

This study utilized multi-level modeling techniques to analyze 12 consecutive years of standardized routine clinical service data from youth receiving treatment in one of two intensive in-home service settings: (a) Multisystemic Therapy (MST; n = 776 youths, 99 therapists), an implemented evidence-based treatment based on ecological theories of behavior in which therapists work with the multiple systems a youth interacts with (school, community, family), and (b) a standards-based service (n = 1854 youth, 413 therapists). Both service settings operate in the context of a publicly funded mental health care system which serves youth and families who are typically from underserved and low-income backgrounds. Majority of youth in this sample identified as multi-ethnic and male, and they, on average, were approximately 13 years old with three co-occurring diagnoses.

RESULTS

A significant TFD by service format interaction on youth functional improvement (alone and in the overall model) and follow up simple effects indicated that higher TFD was associated with significantly poorer outcomes in MST. The parameter estimate for TFD on functional improvement in the standards-based service format was in the same direction, but not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that maintaining a narrower treatment focus might be beneficial to clients, particularly in implemented evidence-based treatments. Likewise, TFD could be a helpful case monitoring tool for clinicians, supervisors, and systems leaders when reviewing intensive-in-home cases.

Transdiagnostic Clinical Staging for Childhood Mental Health: An Adjunctive Tool for Classifying Internalizing and Externalizing Syndromes that Emerge in Children Aged 5-11 Years

Clinical staging is now recognized as a key tool for facilitating innovation in personalized and preventative mental health care. It places a strong emphasis on the salience of indicated prevention, early intervention, and secondary prevention of major mental disorders. By contrast to established models for major mood and psychotic syndromes that emerge after puberty, developments in clinical staging for childhood-onset disorders lags significantly behind. In this article, criteria for a transdiagnostic staging model for those internalizing and externalizing disorders that emerge in childhood is presented. This sits alongside three putative pathophysiological profiles (developmental, circadian, and anxious-arousal) that may underpin these common illness trajectories. Given available evidence, we argue that it is now timely to develop a transdiagnostic staging model for childhood-onset syndromes. It is further argued that a transdiagnostic staging model has the potential to capture more precisely the dimensional, fluctuating developmental patterns of illness progression of childhood psychopathology. Given potential improvements in modelling etiological processes, and delivering more personalized interventions, transdiagnostic clinical staging for childhood holds much promise for assisting to improve outcomes. We finish by presenting an agenda for research in developments of transdiagnostic clinical staging for childhood mental health.

Practices Derived from the Evidence Base for Depression Predict Disruptive Behavior Progress in Adolescent Community Mental Health Care

Disruptive behavior problems develop along multiple causal pathways and are associated with a wide variety of co-occurring problems, including mood disorders. In usual care, effective treatment practices for youth disruptive behavior might differ from what the efficacy research suggests, given treatment setting and population demographic differences. The current study examined whether practices derived from the evidence base for disruptive behavior and/or depressed mood predicted progress on disruptive behavior problems in an adolescent usual care sample. Monthly clinical data, including therapeutic practices, treatment targets, and progress on selected treatment targets, for 1210 youth ages 13-17 who received intensive in-home services and were treated for disruptive behavior problems were examined utilizing multilevel modeling techniques. Practices derived from the evidence base for only depressed mood and practices derived from both disruptive behavior and depressed mood literatures predicted disruptive behavior progress, while practices derived from only the disruptive behavior evidence-based literature did not. All five practice elements exclusive to depressed mood treatment predicted positive disruptive behavior progress, while two of eleven disruptive behavior practices and four of seven practices derived from both problem areas predicted positive progress. Findings held when other predictors were included as covariates, including youth age and functional impairment. Although directionality remains unclear and further research is vital, usual care settings might present barriers to disruptive behavior treatment as prescribed by the evidence base, and youth-focused treatments based on depressed mood treatments merit further examination as a potentially promising route to effective treatment in such settings.

Disruptive Behavior Treatment Progress as a Function of Therapy Focus and Youth Diagnosis in a Community Mental Health Setting

Monthly disruptive behavior treatment progress for 613 youth ages 7-18 receiving intensive in-home services was examined. Multilevel modeling indicated carrying a depressive mood diagnosis predicted less disruptive behavior progress compared to youth with only externalizing diagnoses. Paradoxically, more monthly focus on disruptive behavior treatment targets predicted lower concurrent progress ratings, while greater focus on depressive mood targets predicted greater disruptive behavior progress for youth with a depressive mood diagnosis. Findings held when other predictors of disruptive behavior progress were included as covariates, including episode length, youth age, and functional impairment. Treatment and research implications are discussed.

Factor Analysis of Therapist-Identified Treatment Targets in Community-Based Children's Mental Health

The present study used exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses to identify underlying latent factors affecting variation in community therapists' endorsement of treatment targets. As part of a statewide practice management program, therapist completed monthly reports of treatment targets (up to 10 per month) for a sample of youth (n = 790) receiving intensive in-home therapy. Nearly 75 % of youth were diagnosed with multiple co-occurring disorders. Five factors emerged: Disinhibition, Societal Rules Evasion, Social Engagement Deficits, Emotional Distress, and Management of Biodevelopmental Outcomes. Using logistic regression, primary diagnosis predicted therapist selection of Disinhibition and Emotional Distress targets. Client age predicted endorsement of Societal Rules Evasion targets. Practice-to-research implications are discussed.