NCI Alliance for Nanotechnology in Cancer - from academic research to clinical interventions

Nanomedicine for autophagy modulation in cancer therapy: a clinical perspective

In recent years, progress in nanotechnology provided new tools to treat cancer more effectively. Advances in biomaterials tailored for drug delivery have the potential to overcome the limited selectivity and side effects frequently associated with traditional therapeutic agents. While autophagy is pivotal in determining cell fate and adaptation to different challenges, and despite the fact that it is frequently dysregulated in cancer, antitumor therapeutic strategies leveraging on or targeting this process are scarce. This is due to many reasons, including the very contextual effects of autophagy in cancer, low bioavailability and non-targeted delivery of existing autophagy modulatory compounds. Conjugating the versatile characteristics of nanoparticles with autophagy modulators may render these drugs safer and more effective for cancer treatment. Here, we review current standing questions on the biology of autophagy in tumor progression, and precursory studies and the state-of-the-art in harnessing nanomaterials science to enhance the specificity and therapeutic potential of autophagy modulators.

Trends and patterns in cancer nanotechnology research: A survey of NCI's caNanoLab and nanotechnology characterization laboratory

Cancer nanotechnologies possess immense potential as therapeutic and diagnostic treatment modalities and have undergone significant and rapid advancement in recent years. With this emergence, the complexities of data standards in the field are on the rise. Data sharing and reanalysis is essential to more fully utilize this complex, interdisciplinary information to answer research questions, promote the technologies, optimize use of funding, and maximize the return on scientific investments. In order to support this, various data-sharing portals and repositories have been developed which not only provide searchable nanomaterial characterization data, but also provide access to standardized protocols for synthesis and characterization of nanomaterials as well as cutting-edge publications. The National Cancer Institute's (NCI) caNanoLab is a dedicated repository for all aspects pertaining to cancer-related nanotechnology data. The searchable database provides a unique opportunity for data mining and the use of artificial intelligence and machine learning, which aims to be an essential arm of future research studies, potentially speeding the design and optimization of next-generation therapies. It also provides an opportunity to track the latest trends and patterns in nanomedicine research. This manuscript provides the first look at such trends extracted from caNanoLab and compares these to similar metrics from the NCI's Nanotechnology Characterization Laboratory, a laboratory providing preclinical characterization of cancer nanotechnologies to researchers around the globe. Together, these analyses provide insight into the emerging interests of the research community and rise of promising nanoparticle technologies.

Health and environmental safety of nanomaterials: O Data, Where Art Thou?

Nanotechnology keeps drawing attention due to the great tunable properties of nanomaterials in comparison to their bulk conventional materials. The growth of nanotechnology in combination with the digitization era has led to an increased need of safety related data. In addition to safety, new data-driven paradigms on safe and sustainable by design materials are stressing the necessity of data even more. Data is a fundamental asset to the scientific community in studying and analysing the entire life-cycle of nanomaterials. Unfortunately, data exist in a scattered fashion, in different sources and formats. To our knowledge, there is no study focusing on aspects of actual data-structure knowledge that exists in literature and databases. The purpose of this review research is to transparently and comprehensively, display to the nanoscience community the datasets readily available for machine learning purposes making it convenient and more efficient for the next users such as modellers or data curators to retrieve information. We systematically recorded the features and descriptors available in the datasets and provide synopsised information on their ranges, forms and metrics in the supplementary material.

The Community Oncology and Academic Medical Center Alliance in the Age of Precision Medicine: Cancer Genetics and Genomics Considerations

Recent public policy, governmental regulatory and economic trends have motivated the establishment and deepening of community health and academic medical center alliances. Accordingly, community oncology practices now deliver a significant portion of their oncology care in association with academic cancer centers. In the age of precision medicine, this alliance has acquired critical importance; novel advances in nucleic acid sequencing, the generation and analysis of immense data sets, the changing clinical landscape of hereditary cancer predisposition and ongoing discovery of novel, targeted therapies challenge community-based oncologists to deliver molecularly-informed health care. The active engagement of community oncology practices with academic partners helps with meeting these challenges; community/academic alliances result in improved cancer patient care and provider efficacy. Here, we review the community oncology and academic medical center alliance. We examine how practitioners may leverage academic center precision medicine-based cancer genetics and genomics programs to advance their patients' needs. We highlight a number of project initiatives at the City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center that seek to optimize community oncology and academic cancer center precision medicine interactions.

Nanotoxicology data for in silico tools: a literature review

The exercise of non-testing approaches in nanoparticles (NPs) hazard assessment is necessary for the risk assessment, considering cost and time efficiency, to identify, assess, and classify potential risks. One strategy for investigating the toxicological properties of a variety of NPs is by means of computational tools that decode how nano-specific features relate to toxicity and enable its prediction. This literature review records systematically the data used in published studies that predict nano (eco)-toxicological endpoints using machine learning models. Instead of seeking mechanistic interpretations this review maps the pathways followed, involving biological features in relation to NPs exposure, their physico-chemical characteristics and the most commonly predicted outcomes. The results, derived from published research of the last decade, are summarized visually, providing prior-based data mining paradigms to be readily used by the nanotoxicology community in computational studies.

Perspectives on the Future of Nanomedicine to Impact Patients: An Analysis of US Federal Funding and Interventional Clinical Trials

The US and governments around the world, and companies, have made a considerable investment in nanomedicine, and there have been important discoveries. Nevertheless, there has been considerable debate as to whether the investment, both in money and in time, has been worth it. That question is not yet definitively answerable. However, investigators (and investors) might also wonder if the efforts in nanomedicine are likely to continue at the same pace as over the past decade. For this paper, an analysis was done by searching Medline, RePORT, the DOD (CDMRP), the NSF, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The major findings from the analysis are as follows: (1) The number of journal articles on the subject of nanomedicine continues to steadily rise and the areas "Drug Carriers" and "Drug Delivery Systems" are experiencing particularly rapid growth. (2) The level of funding from the Department of Health and Human Services (NIH and others) for indications other than cancer has been greater than that for cancer. (3) Funding for applications in HIV/AIDS has been strong. (4) Most of the cancers are being impacted. (5) The number of clinical trials are more highly focused in breast, skin, metastatic, and ovarian cancers, though the noncancer indications of pain and infections are also highly represented. The trials are primarily in Phases I and II, suggesting a long horizon before translating to a high impact on patients. (6) The vast majority of the clinical trials are for the evaluation of established nanomedicine formulations (liposomes and nab-paclitaxel/Abraxane) in combination with other therapies. Nevertheless, the number of clinical trials with other nanomedicine formulations has been increasing since 2009. Relatively few of the trials are for micelles or dendrimers. Taken as a whole, the analysis provides a picture that nanomedicine continues to be highly funded and highly studied but with few recent breakthroughs. Nanomedicine has yet to provide the "silver bullet" for therapy in cancer or other diseases, and it remains unclear whether it ever will.

National Cancer Institute Alliance for nanotechnology in cancer-Catalyzing research and translation toward novel cancer diagnostics and therapeutics

Nanotechnology has been a burgeoning research field, which is finding compelling applications in several practical areas of everyday life. It has provided novel, paradigm shifting solutions to medical problems and particularly to cancer. In order to accelerate integration of nanotechnology into cancer research and oncology, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) established the NCI Alliance for Nanotechnology in Cancer program in 2005. This effort brought together scientists representing physical sciences, chemistry, and engineering working at the nanoscale with biologists and clinicians working on cancer to form a uniquely multidisciplinary cancer nanotechnology research community. The last 14 years of the program have produced a remarkable body of scientific discovery and demonstrated its utility to the development of practical cancer interventions. This paper takes stock of how the Alliance program influenced melding of disparate research disciplines into the field of nanomedicine and cancer nanotechnology, has been highly productive in the scientific arena, and produced a mechanism of seamless transfer of novel technologies developed in academia to the clinical and commercial space. This article is categorized under: Toxicology and Regulatory Issues in Nanomedicine > Regulatory and Policy Issues in Nanomedicine Therapeutic Approaches and Drug Discovery > Nanomedicine for Oncologic Disease Diagnostic Tools > in vivo Nanodiagnostics and Imaging.