Family history of breast cancer and all-cause mortality after breast cancer diagnosis in the Breast Cancer Family Registry

5-Year Survival Rates and Prognostic Factors in Patients with Synchronus and Metachronus Breast Cancer from 2010 to 2015

Introduction:

Currently breast (BC) cancer is a serious medical problem in all countries of the world. Survival depends on many factors. The present study focused on 5-year survival and its related factors in patients with BC in Iran. Material and methods. The present analytical retrospective study was performed (from March 2010 until March 2015) on patients with BC followed for at least 6 months. The main variables assessed were tumor size, grade of lymph node involvement, metastasis, stage, history, human epidermal growth factor receptor expression, and tumor origin. Analysis of survival was accomplished using the Kaplan- Meier method.

Results:

Some 351 (80.2%) of the total of 438 individuals had unilateral and 87(19.8%) had bilateral cancer, 28 (35.6%) of the latter being synchronous and 56(64.4%) metachronous. Mean duration of follow-up was 47.44±28.19 months, during which 61 (17.3%) patients with unilateral and 18 with bilateral cancer eventually died. The 5-year survival rate in patients with unilateral BC was significantly higher than those with bilateral BC (Log-rank Test chi2= 3.11, p=0.032). In addition, with metachronous cases, the survival rate was 64.2% in comparison with 51.6% for synchronous BCs. Survival rate was significantly (p value =0.038) higher with metachronous than with synchronous cancers (Log-rank Test chi2=3.54, p=0.038). The highest survival rate was reported for BCs originating from lobule tissue and the lowest rate examples of interstitial tissue origin (Log-rank Test chi2=11.54, p=0.0001). Patients with earl stage lesions (M1) survived longer than with other stages (Log-rank Test chi2= 9.55, p=0.001).

Conclusion:

In this study, most women with BC had a positive family history and were married. The 5-year survival rate was lower with advanced stages of cancer. According to our findings, survival rates might improve if patients undergo screening and diagnosis is made at an early stage of the disease.

Second primary cancer after female breast cancer: Familial risks and cause of death

Background

With continuous increases in survival rates following breast cancer (BC) diagnosis, the challenge of multiple primary cancers has become an issue. The data on familial risk of SPCs after BC diagnosis and the related mortality in BC patients are scarce.

Methods

A total of 87 752 female BC patients were followed for SPC diagnoses and records of death. Relative risks (RRs) of SPC in BC patients who had first‐degree relatives (parents or siblings) affected by the same cancer were compared to the patients without family history. Causes of death were compared between patients with and without SPC.

Results

After a median follow‐up of 5 years, 14 952 BC patients developed SPCs, among which 10 280 (68.8%) had first‐degree relatives diagnosed with cancer. Familial risks were significant for 14 site‐specific SPCs, and the highest risk was for second ovarian cancer (RR = 6.28, 95%CI: 4.50‐8.75), compared to those without family history (1.49, 1.34‐1.65). In patients with SPC, SPC was the main cause of death, including diverse cancers and BC in approximately equal proportions.

Conclusions

Family history contributed to the excess number of patients with SPCs, and SPC was the leading cause of death in patients with SPC. Taking family history at diagnosis of BC may provide warning signs with regard to possible subsequent SPCs and may offer possibilities for counseling, intervention and management.

Family history contributed to the excess number of BC patients with SPC. SPC was found the leading cause of death in BC patients with SPC.

The association between prognosis of breast cancer and first-degree family history of breast or ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Whether a positive family history of breast cancer or ovarian cancer (FHBOC) would affect the prognosis of breast cancer is still up for debate and further study. This meta-analysis was performed to clarify this issue. We reviewed two databases (PubMed and CNKI) for research articles published at any time from the inception of these databases to April 1, 2016 for articles detecting the impact of FHBOC on the prognosis of breast cancer. A meta-analysis was conducted to generated combined hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS). Eighteen studies were included in our qualitative analysis, with 15 studies ultimately part of the quantitative analysis. The pooled results demonstrated that a positive FHBOC was associated with better OS (0.89, 95% CI 0.83-0.95) and BCSS (0.90, 95% CI 0.82-0.99). In subgroup analyses, several subgroups (maximally adjusted studies, population based studies, high quality studies, family history of breast cancer, studies from Europe, studies from Asia, 1 affected relative, or tumor size > 2 cm), a positive first-degree FHBOC was associated with better prognosis of breast cancer. Notably, for those patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery, first-degree FHBOC was not a risk factor for OS (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.53-2.21). Our meta-analysis demonstrated that a first-degree FHBOC was associated with better OS and BCSS in patients with breast cancer. These findings support that clinical management should not differ between women with and without FHBOC.

Breast cancer family history leads to early breast cancer detection and optimal management

PURPOSE

We investigated whether the relationship between family history (FH) of breast cancer and survival of women with breast cancer is related to the quality of care received, once adjusted for other prognostic variables using data from the Geneva population-based cancer registry and quality of care indicators defined by the European Society of breast cancer specialists (EUSOMA).

METHODS

We included non-metastatic malignant breast tumor patients who had their surgery between 2001 and 2010. We assessed the association between FH and patient and tumor characteristics on one hand, and each quality of care indicator and an overall score of quality of care, on the other hand, through logistic regression. We assessed the impact of FH and the quality of care-score on 5-year survival with Cox regression adjusting for patient and tumor characteristics.

RESULTS

2,672 patients were included in the study. Women with a positive FH were younger, more likely from Switzerland, screen detected, had positive estrogen and progesterone receptor status, and had smaller and ductal tumors. A positive FH was also associated with better management for several quality indicators. Women with a positive FH had a better crude survival (Hazard Ratio 0.61, p = 0.006). This association was not substantially affected when adjusting for quality of care. However, the effect of FH did not persist when also adjusting for patient and tumor characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

A positive FH of breast cancer is associated with earlier breast cancer diagnosis, better tumor features, and higher quality of care. These factors explain the better survival observed among breast cancer women with a positive FH as compared to women without positive FH.

Meanings of abortion in context: accounts of abortion in the lives of women diagnosed with breast cancer

BACKGROUND

A breast cancer diagnosis and an abortion can each be pivotal moments in a woman's life. Research on abortion and breast cancer deals predominantly with women diagnosed during pregnancy who might be advised to have an abortion. The other-discredited but persistent-association is that abortions cause breast cancer. The aim here was to understand some of the ways in which women themselves might experience the convergence of abortion and breast cancer.

METHODS

Among 50 women recruited from the Australian Breast Cancer Family Study and interviewed in depth about what it meant to have a breast cancer diagnosis before the age of 41, five spontaneously told of having or contemplating an abortion. The transcripts of these five women were analysed to identify what abortion meant in the context of breast cancer, studying each woman's account as an individual "case" and interpreting it within narrative theory.

RESULTS

It was evident that each woman understood abortion as playing a different role in her life. One reported an abortion that she did not link to her cancer, the second was relieved not to have to abort a mid-treatment pregnancy, the third represented abortion as saving her life by making her cancer identifiable, the fourth grieved an abortion that had enabled her to begin chemotherapy, and the fifth believed that her cancer was caused by an earlier abortion.

CONCLUSIONS

The women's accounts illustrate the different meanings of abortion in women's lives, with concomitant need for diverse support, advice, and information.

Clinical and pathological features of BRCA1/2 tumors in a sample of high-risk Moroccan breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes explain a large part of hereditary breast cancer. Several studies have shown that BRCA1 and BRCA2 tumors exhibit some specific morphological and immunohistochemical characteristics. The aim of our study is to compare the clinicopathological characteristics between Moroccan breast cancers associated or not with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. Previously, we had identified 11 BRCA carriers in a series of 40 selected breast cancer patients at increased risk for carrying a mutation in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. The clinical and pathological features of patients carrying BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation (n = 11) were evaluated and compared to those of non-mutated patients (n = 29).

RESULTS

In comparison with non carriers, women with BRCA1/2 mutation present younger mean age at diagnosis (37.90 vs. 44.48 years, p = 0.05), younger mean age of 1st menarche (13.08 vs. 14.24 years, p = 0.05) and shorter duration of breastfeeding (8.71 vs. 19.35 months, p = 0.05). Moreover, 63.6 and 62.5% of BRCA1/2 carriers present SBR grade III and triple negative tumors respectively (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

In this first Moroccan study comparing clinical and pathological characteristics of women carrying or not BRCA1/2 mutation, patients with BRCA mutation tend to develop early breast cancer with high-grade and triple negative tumors. However, further large scale research including more data is needed to better characterize BRCA1/2 cases and to evaluate the survival rate associated with these mutations in our population tumors. Moreover, it would be more interesting to study women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations separately in order to determine if they exhibit distinct characteristics.

Family history of breast cancer and its association with disease severity and mortality

A family history (FH) of breast cancer (BC) is known to increase an individual's risk of disease onset. However, its role in disease severity and mortality is less clear. We aimed to ascertain associations between FH of BC, severity and BC‐specific mortality in a hospital‐based cohort of 5354 women with prospective information on FH. We included women diagnosed at Guy's and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust between 1975 and 2012 (n = 5354). BC severity was defined and categorized as good, moderate, and poor prognosis. Data on BC‐specific mortality was obtained from the National Cancer Registry and medical records. Associations between FH and disease severity or BC‐specific mortality were evaluated using proportional odds models and Cox proportional hazard regression models, respectively. Available data allowed adjustment for potential confounders (e.g., treatment, socioeconomic status, and ethnicity). FH of any degree was not associated with disease severity at time of diagnosis (adjusted proportional OR: 1.00 [95% CI: 0.85 to 1.17]), which remained true also after stratification by period of diagnosis. FH of BC was not associated with BC‐mortality HR: 0.99 (95% CI: 0.93 to 1.05). We did not find evidence to support an association between FH of BC and severity and BC‐specific mortality. Our results indicate that clinical management should not differ between women with and without FH, when the underlying mutation is unknown.

Long-term effects of first degree family history of breast cancer in young women: Recurrences and bilateral breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to analyze the impact of first degree relative (FDR) of young breast cancer patients.

METHODS

Data were used from our prospective population-based cohort study which started in 1983. The family history (FH) was registered with regard to FDR: the presence or absence of invasive breast cancer in none vs. one or more FDRs at any age.

RESULTS

A total of 1109 women, ≤50 years with 1128 breast conserving treatments was seen. The incidence of FDR was 17.0% for one FDR and 3.2% ≥2 FDR. The three groups, none, 1 or ≥2 FDR, were comparable. The local failure rate is comparable for all three groups. Women with a positive FH and metachronous bilateral breast cancer (MBBC) showed a lower local failure (HR 0.2; 95% CI 0.05-0.8). A positive FH was an independent predictor for a better disease-specific survival (HR 0.6; 95% CI 0.4-0.9).

CONCLUSION

A positive FH, based on FDR implies a better prognosis in relation to survival for young women treated with BCT. In contrast to no FH for FDR, MBBC in women with a positive FH was not associated with an increased risk of local recurrence.

Family history and outcome of young patients with breast cancer in the UK (POSH study)

BACKGROUND

Young patients presenting to surgical clinics with breast cancer are usually aware of their family history and frequently believe that a positive family history may adversely affect their prognosis. Tumour pathology and outcomes were compared in young British patients with breast cancer with and without a family history of breast cancer.

METHODS

Prospective Outcomes in Sporadic versus Hereditary breast cancer (POSH) is a large prospective cohort study of women aged less than 41 years with breast cancer diagnosed and treated in the UK using modern oncological management. Personal characteristics, tumour pathology, treatment and family history of breast/ovarian cancer were recorded. Follow-up data were collected annually.

RESULTS

Family history data were available for 2850 patients. No family history was reported by 65·9 per cent, and 34·1 per cent reported breast/ovarian cancer in at least one first- or second-degree relative. Patients with a family history were more likely to have grade 3 tumours (63·3 versus 58·9 per cent) and less likely to have human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive tumours (24·7 versus 28·8 per cent) than those with no family history. In multivariable analyses, there were no significant differences in distant disease-free intervals for patients with versus those without a family history, either for the whole cohort (hazard ratio (HR) 0·89, 95 per cent c.i. 0·76 to 1·03; P = 0·120) or when stratified by oestrogen receptor (ER) status (ER-negative: HR 0·80, 0·62 to 1·04, P = 0·101; ER-positive: HR 0·95, 0·78 to 1·15, P = 0·589).

CONCLUSION

Young British patients presenting to breast surgical clinics with a positive family history can be reassured that this is not a significant independent risk factor for breast cancer outcome.

Breast cancer prognosis in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: an International Prospective Breast Cancer Family Registry population-based cohort study

PURPOSE

To compare breast cancer prognosis in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with that in patients with sporadic disease.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

An international population-based cohort study was conducted in Canada, the United States, and Australia of 3,220 women with incident breast cancer diagnosed between 1995 and 2000 and observed prospectively. Ninety-three had BRCA1 mutations; 71, BRCA2 mutations; one, both mutations; 1,550, sporadic breast cancer; and 1,505, familial breast cancer (without known BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation). Distant recurrence and death were analyzed.

RESULTS

Mean age at diagnosis was 45.3 years; mean follow-up was 7.9 years. Risks of distant recurrence and death did not differ significantly between BRCA1 mutation carriers and those with sporadic disease in univariable and multivariable analyses. Risk of distant recurrence was higher for BRCA2 mutation carriers compared with those with sporadic disease in univariable analysis (hazard ratio [HR], 1.63; 95% CI, 1.02 to 2.60; P = .04). Risk of death was also higher in BRCA2 carriers in univariable analysis (HR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.15 to 2.86; P = .01). After adjustment for age, tumor stage and grade, nodal status, hormone receptors, and year of diagnosis, no differences were observed for distant recurrence (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.62 to 1.61; P = 1.00) or death (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.79; P = .64).

CONCLUSION

Outcomes of BRCA1 mutation carriers were similar to those of patients with sporadic breast cancer. Worse outcomes in BRCA2 mutation carriers in univariable analysis seem to reflect the presence of more adverse tumor characteristics in these carriers. Similar outcomes were identified in BRCA2 carriers and those with sporadic disease in multivariable analyses.

Family history of breast cancer in relation to tumor characteristics and mortality in a population-based study of young women with invasive breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Inherited predisposition may be associated with distinctive breast cancer phenotypes and/or mortality. Past studies have had inconsistent results and little is known about the contributions of screening and treatment.

METHODS

Within a population-based cohort of 1,260 women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer before age 46, we assessed how family history of breast cancer relates to mortality and tumor characteristics. Analyses were repeated excluding BRCA1/BRCA2 carriers. Medical records were reviewed for treatment history and tumors were centrally reviewed and tested. Cox proportional hazard modeling was used to assess the risk of dying in relation to family history; logistic regression was used to assess the association of family history to tumor characteristics.

RESULTS

Compared with women with no family history, women with first-degree family history of breast cancer had a 40% reduction (95% CI: 0.5-0.8) in the risk of dying. Mortality in women with only a second-degree family history was similar to those with no family history. The risk of dying was further reduced in those with a greater number of affected relatives. These relationships did not seem to be attributable to differences in screening, detection method, or treatment. Tumors in women with a first-degree family history had generally more favorable prognostic profiles.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that breast cancer patients with a first-degree family history, compared with their counterparts without such a profile, may have a better prognosis.

IMPACT

These findings support the need for future research directed at replicating these results and identifying factors underlying this possible relationship.

Past recreational physical activity, body size, and all-cause mortality following breast cancer diagnosis: results from the Breast Cancer Family Registry

Few studies have considered the joint association of body mass index (BMI) and physical activity, two modifiable factors, with all-cause mortality after breast cancer diagnosis. Women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer (n = 4,153) between 1991 and 2000 were enrolled in the Breast Cancer Family Registry through population-based sampling in Northern California, USA; Ontario, Canada; and Melbourne and Sydney, Australia. During a median follow-up of 7.8 years, 725 deaths occurred. Baseline questionnaires assessed moderate and vigorous recreational physical activity and BMI prior to diagnosis. Associations with all-cause mortality were assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression, adjusting for established prognostic factors. Compared with no physical activity, any recreational activity during the 3 years prior to diagnosis was associated with a 34% lower risk of death [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.51-0.85] for women with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive tumors, but not those with ER-negative tumors; this association did not appear to differ by race/ethnicity or BMI. Lifetime physical activity was not associated with all-cause mortality. BMI was positively associated with all-cause mortality for women diagnosed at age > or =50 years with ER-positive tumors (compared with normal-weight women, HR for overweight = 1.39, 95% CI: 0.90-2.15; HR for obese = 1.77, 95% CI: 1.11-2.82). BMI associations did not appear to differ by race/ethnicity. Our findings suggest that physical activity and BMI exert independent effects on overall mortality after breast cancer.

Prediagnosis reproductive factors and all-cause mortality for women with breast cancer in the breast cancer family registry

Studies have examined the prognostic relevance of reproductive factors before breast cancer diagnosis, but most have been small and their overall findings inconclusive. Associations between reproductive risk factors and all-cause mortality after breast cancer diagnosis were assessed with the use of a population-based cohort of 3,107 women of White European ancestry with invasive breast cancer (1,130 from Melbourne and Sydney, Australia; 1,441 from Ontario, Canada; and 536 from Northern California, United States). During follow-up with a median of 8.5 years, 567 deaths occurred. At recruitment, questionnaire data were collected on oral contraceptive use, number of full-term pregnancies, age at first full-term pregnancy, time from last full-term pregnancy to breast cancer diagnosis, breastfeeding, age at menarche, and menopause and menopausal status at breast cancer diagnosis. Hazard ratios for all-cause mortality were estimated with the use of Cox proportional hazards models with and without adjustment for age at diagnosis, study center, education, and body mass index. Compared with nulliparous women, those who had a child up to 2 years, or between 2 and 5 years, before their breast cancer diagnosis were more likely to die. The unadjusted hazard ratio estimates were 2.75 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.98-3.83; P < 0.001] and 2.20 (95% CI, 1.65-2.94; P < 0.001), respectively, and the adjusted estimates were 2.25 (95% CI, 1.59-3.18; P < 0.001) and 1.82 (95% CI, 1.35-2.46; P < 0.001), respectively. When evaluating the prognosis of women recently diagnosed with breast cancer, the time since last full-term pregnancy should be routinely considered along with other established host and tumor prognostic factors, but consideration of other reproductive factors may not be warranted.

Impact of a positive family history on diagnosis, management, and survival of breast cancer: different effects across socio-economic groups

BACKGROUND

This study aims to investigate whether increased awareness of breast cancer, due to a positive family history (FH), reduces diagnostic, therapeutic, and survival differences between women of low versus high socio-economic status (SES).

METHODS

All breast cancer patients registered between 1990 and 2005 at the population-based Geneva Cancer Registry were included. With multivariate logistic and Cox regression analysis, we estimated the impact of SES and FH on method of detection, treatment, and mortality from breast cancer.

RESULTS

SES discrepancies in method of detection and suboptimal treatment, as seen among women without a FH, disappeared in the presence of a positive FH. SES differences in stage and survival remained regardless of the presence of a positive FH. Overall, positive FH was associated with better survival. This effect was the strongest in women of high SES (age-adjusted Hazard Ratio [HR(ageadj)] 0.54 [0.3-1.0]) but less pronounced in women of middle (0.77 [0.6-1.0]), and absent in women of low SES (0.80 [0.5-1.2]).

CONCLUSION

A positive FH of breast cancer may reduce SES differences in access to screening and optimal treatment. However, even with better access to early detection and optimal treatment, women of low SES have higher risks of death from their disease than those of high SES.