Prognostic significance of receptor expression discordance between primary and recurrent breast cancers: a meta-analysis

Breast cancer characteristics in low- and middle-income countries: An umbrella review

Breast cancer presents significant challenges in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) due to disparities in healthcare access and outcomes. This umbrella review synthesizes data on breast cancer characteristics-age at diagnosis, staging, and molecular subtypes-to guide targeted healthcare strategies in LMICs. Our umbrella review was conducted following PRISMA 2020 and JBI guidelines. Systematic reviews from 2009 to 2024 were sourced from PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane. Reviews were assessed with AMSTAR 2, and only those rated moderate or higher were included. Data synthesis and meta-analyses were performed using R. From 1165 records, 35 systematic reviews met initial criteria; nine were included in the final synthesis, representing 305 primary studies (195 relevant to LMICs). Of those, 50 % were hospital-based and 22 % population-based, limiting the generalizability of the data and the importance of promoting more population-based studies. The overall quality of systematic reviews was variable, with only a few meeting high standards. Geographic analysis revealed a significant underrepresentation of high-quality reviews in sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America. Age at diagnosis varied: sub-Saharan Africa (45-52 years), Middle East (36-56 years), and Latin America (∼49-53 years). Advanced-stage diagnoses (stages III and IV) were common, worsening prognostic outcomes. Molecular subtype analysis indicated a predominance of luminal A but highlighted treatment challenges due to limited targeted therapy access. The results emphasize a pressing need to enhance the availability and quality of primary data, including both hospital-based and population-based studies, particularly in underrepresented regions like sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America. Addressing these gaps with rigorous, locally focused studies is essential for improving breast cancer prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. Enhancing methodological standards and expanding research in these areas will be crucial to bridging global breast cancer outcomes disparities.

Receptor Discordance in Metastatic Breast Cancer; a review of clinical and genetic subtype alterations from primary to metastatic disease

PURPOSE

Receptor and subtype discordance between primary breast tumours and metastases is a frequently reported phenomenon. The aim of this article is to review the current evidence on receptor discordance in metastatic breast cancer and to explore the benefit of performing a repeat biopsy in this context.

METHODS

Searches were undertaken on PubMed and Clinicaltrials.gov for relevant publications and trials.

CONCLUSION

The current guidelines recommend offering to perform a biopsy of a metastatic lesion to evaluate receptor status. The choice of systemic therapy in metastatic disease is often based on the receptor status of the primary lesion. As therapeutic decision making is guided by subtype, biopsy of the metastatic lesion to determine receptor status may alter treatment. This article discusses discordance rates, the mechanisms of receptor discordance, the effect of discordance on treatment and survival outcomes, as well as highlighting some ongoing clinical trials in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Changes in expression of breast cancer tumor biomarkers between primary tumors and corresponding metastatic sites: common patterns and relationships with survival

PURPOSE

In metastatic breast cancer, differences in expression patterns of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) between the primary tumor (PT) and metastatic site (MET) have been reported. However, there is limited understanding of the relationship of tumor subtype discordance and overall survival (OS). We evaluated patterns of ER/PR/HER2 in PTs and corresponding METs and assessed the relationship between these patterns and OS.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed at our center with metastatic breast cancer (2011-2020) were included. ER/PR were stratified as < 1%/1-10%/ > 10% by immunohistochemistry and HER2 as positive/negative by immunohistochemistry/FISH. Tumor subtypes were classified as ER or PR + /HER2-, HER2+ , or triple-negative. Biomarker discordance data from PTs to METs were analyzed for expression patterns. OS was assessed.

RESULTS

Of 254 patients, 41 (16.1%) had synchronous and 213 (83.9%) had metachronous METs. Category change of ER/PR/HER2 expression was observed in 56 (22.0%), 117 (40.5%), and 30 (11.8%) patients, respectively. Tumor subtype changed in 56 (22.0%) patients. We identified a difference between PT and MET from ER > 10% to ER < 1% (n = 28,16.2% p < 0.01); PR > 10% to PR < 1% (n = 54,48.2%, p < 0.001); PR > 10% to PR 1-10% (n = 18,16.1%, p < 0.001), and ER or PR+/HER2- to triple-negative (n = 19,13.0%, p = 0.03). In log-rank analysis, change from an ER or PR+/HER2- (5-year OS 88.6%) PT to a HER2+(67.5%) or triple-negative (54.6%) MET was associated with decreased survival (p < 0.01); however, in multivariate analysis, discordant biomarker expression was not associated with decreased survival (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Tumor expression of ER/PR/HER2 can differ between the PT and MET. Loss of ER/PR expression is common and may be related to worse survival. Routine assessment of MET tumor markers could inform prognosis and therapeutic decision-making.

Estrogen-Receptor Loss and ESR1 Mutation in Estrogen-Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer and the Effect on Overall Survival

In patients with metastatic estrogen-receptor (ER)-positive HER2-negative breast cancer, the loss of ER expression and the mutation of ESR1-the gene encoding the ER receptor-are mechanisms for resistance to endocrine therapy. We aimed to determine the frequency of these mechanisms and their interaction. Metastases were retrieved from our pathology files. ESR1 hotspot mutations resulting in p.(D538G), p.(Y537S), and p.(L536H) were determined by means of pyrosequencing. Clinical data were retrieved from electronic medical records. A total of 136 metastases were available for analysis. ER loss was found in 23 metastases (17%). ESR1 mutations were found in 18 metastases (13%), including p.(D538G) in 9, p.(Y537S) in 7, and p.(L536H) in 2. ESR1 mutation and ER loss were mutually exclusive (p = 0.042), and ESR1 mutation was associated with endocrine therapy (p = 0.002). ESR1 mutation was found in two primary breast cancers. ESR1 mutations are rare in primary breast cancer and develop in metastases during endocrine therapy. Furthermore, ER loss had a statistically significant negative effect on overall survival when compared to patients without ER loss, with a rate ratio of 3.21 (confidence interval 1.95-5.26). No such effect was observed for ESR1 mutations, with a rate ratio of 1.15 (confidence interval 0.67-1.95). We conclude that ER loss and ESR1 mutation together account for 30% of the resistance to endocrine therapy.

Texture analysis using non-contrast MRI to predict estrogen receptor status in breast cancer lesions: Is it feasible?

PURPOSE

We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of non-contrast-enhanced T1 sequence in texture analysis of breast cancer lesions to predict their estrogen receptor status.

METHODS

The study included 85 pathologically proven breast cancer lesions in 53 patients. Immunohistochemical studies were performed to determine the estrogen receptor status (ER). Lesions were divided into two groups: ER + ve status and ER-ve status. Texture analysis using the second-order analysis features [The Co-occurrence matrix (11 features)] was applied on both T1 and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI images for each lesion. Texture features gained from both T1 and DCE images were analyzed to obtain cut-off values using ROC curves to sort lesions according to their estrogen receptor status.

RESULTS

Angular second momentum and some of the entropy-based features showed statistically significant cut-off values in differentiation between the two groups [P-values for pre- and post-contrast images for AngSecMom (0.001, 0.008), sum entropy (0.003,0.005), and entropy (0.033,0.019), respectively]. On comparing the AUCs between pre- and post-contrast images, we found that differences were statistically insignificant. Sum of squares, sum variance, and sum average showed statistically significant cut-off points only on pre-contrast images [P-values for sum of squares (0.018), sum variance (0.024), and sum average (0.039)].

CONCLUSIONS

Texture analysis features showed promising results in predicting estrogen receptor status of breast cancer lesions on non-contrast T1 images.

Biomarker conversion from primary breast cancer to synchronous axillary lymph node metastasis and neoadjuvant therapy response: a single-center analysis

PURPOSE

The biomarker characteristics of breast cancer plays an important role in predicting treatment sensitivity. The aim of the present study was to compare immunohistochemical profiles (ER, PR, HER2, and Ki67) between the primary tumor and synchronous axillary lymph node metastasis and investigate the subsequent effects on neoadjuvant therapy response.

METHODS

A total of 358 patients with pathologically confirmed synchronous axillary lymph node metastasis at first diagnosis and treated by neoadjuvant therapy at Peking University First Hospital from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2022 were included in this retrospective study. Clinicopathologic data, especially receptor status in primary and metastatic foci, was collected for each case.

RESULTS

Change of ER, PR, HER2, and Ki67 expression was observed in 5.9%, 8.7%, 12.6%, and 17.3% of patients, respectively. HR discordance was observed more frequently when the ER status (p = 0.023) or PR status (p = 0.010) of primary tumor was negative, while HER2 discordance seemed to be more frequent when the HER2 status of primary tumor was HER2-0 or HER2-low (p < 0.001). Patients with loss of HR-positivity (positive to negative) responded to neoadjuvant chemotherapy better compared to those with stable positive HR expression (50% vs. 11.1%, p = 0.0017). A significantly decrease in pCR rate was observed in patients with unstable HER2 status, but not in the HER2-0/HER2-low subgroup.

CONCLUSION

Receptor discordance between primary tumor and synchronous axillary LNM appears to already exist before any anti-tumor therapy. This instability has limited clinical impact on the choice of neoadjuvant therapy at current stage, but further investigation is warranted with the incremental application of endocrine drugs and ADCs in neoadjuvant therapy.

Receptor discordance after nipple-sparing mastectomy

Background

Recent studies have shown that receptor status of breast cancer change between primary tumor and recurrence, which may influence treatment strategy and prognosis, but there are few reports on receptor discordance between primary tumors and local recurrence (LR) after nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM).

Patients and methods

We collected 74 patients who had LR after NSM for newly diagnosed stages 0 to 3 breast cancer between 2008 and 2016 at 14 institutions. We classified into 4 subtypes based on hormone receptor (HR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). We evaluated clinicopathological factors that correlate with receptor discordance and assessed the impact of receptor discordance on survival.

Results

Discordance rates in estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR) and HER2 were 9.5, 10.8 and 5.4 %, respectively. The most common change was from HR-/HER2+ to HR+/HER2+, and this pattern of receptor change occurred only in patients with nipple-areolar recurrence. Non-invasive tumors in LR, nipple-areolar recurrence (NAR), HR-/HER2+ primary tumor subtype, and the presence of chemotherapy for primary tumors were significantly associated with receptor discordance. With a median follow-up of 44.5 months (4-153 months), patients in the receptor-discordant group had no disease-free survival (DFS) event after LR resection (5-year DFS; 100 % in the receptor-discordant group vs 85.1 % in the receptor-concordant group; p = 0.2).

Conclusion

Our study demonstrates that the presence of chemotherapy for primary tumors, nipple-areolar recurrence, and its related factors (non-invasive tumor in LR, HR-/HER2+ primary tumor subtype) were associated with receptor discordance. However, further studies with longer follow-up periods and larger sample sizes are needed.

Retrospective analysis of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2), Ki67 changes and their clinical significance between primary breast cancer and metastatic tumors

Objective

To explore the relationship between receptor heterogeneity and clinicopathological characteristics in 166 patients with invasive breast cancer during metastasis.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 166 patients diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer through biopsy, who were admitted to our hospital from January 2018 to December 2022. Statistical analysis was employed to assess the heterogeneity of receptors in both primary and metastatic lesions, including estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2), Ki67, as well as their association with clinicopathological features such as tumor size, lymph node metastasis, treatment regimen, and disease-free survival.

Results

The discordant expression rates of ER, PR, HER2, Ki-67 and Luminal classification between primary and metastatic lesions were 21.7%, 41.6%, 8.9%, 34.4% and 36.8%, respectively. There is a significant difference in disease-free survival between patients with consistent and inconsistent receptor status of primary and metastatic lesions, which is statistically significant. The median DFS for primary HER2(-) to metastatic HER2(+) was 84 months, which was relatively high. The Cox multivariate regression analysis revealed that the expression differences of ER, PR, HER2, and Ki67 were not influenced by endocrine therapy and chemotherapy. However, a statistically significant difference in HER2 expression was observed with targeted therapy. Tumor size was correlated with ER and Ki67 receptor status (P = 0.019, 0.016). Tumor size was not correlated with PR, and HER2 (P = 0.679, 0.440). Lymph node metastasis was not associated with changes in ER, PR, HER2, and Ki67. The discordant rates of ER, PR, HER2, and Ki-67 in patients with local recurrence were 22%, 23.7%, 5.1%, and 28.8% respectively, whereas those in patients with distant metastasis were 21.5%, 36.4%, 10.3%, and 31.8% respectively.

Conclusions

The expression levels of ER, PR, HER2, and Ki-67 in primary and metastatic breast cancer exhibit heterogeneity, which is closely associated with the prognosis and treatment outcomes of patients.

SM, Jacob L, Babu G. Study of Biomarker Discordance between Primary and Recurrent Sites and its Clinical Implications in Metastatic Breast Cancer : A Single Institutional Study from India

S. Shanthala Immunophenotypic discordance of receptors between primary and metastatic sites significantly impacts treatment outcomes. Current international guidelines recommend rebiopsy of accessible metastatic lesions to reassess tissue biomarkers. While existing literature on biomarker changes is conflicting and heterogeneous, similar studies on the Indian cohort of breast cancer patients are lacking. In this context, we aimed to evaluate the frequencies of biomarker changes between biopsies from primary and recurrent sites, and their association with various clinicopathological characteristics, including the type of metastasis and treatment in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. This is an ambispective study performed at a single center. Immunohistochemical (IHC) expression of paired primary and recurrence samples of MBC patients was reviewed for the expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2), and Ki-67. Concordance, loss, and gain of receptors were assessed based on the Allred scores for ER, PR, and HER2. Ki-67 was assessed based on a 14% cutoff. Further, receptor changes were studied in relation to age, menopausal status, morphology, grade, stage, metastatic sites, interval between biopsies, and treatment. At progression, biopsies were obtained from 41.18% of locoregional recurrence and 58.82% of metastatic sites. Despite high discordance of 47% for ER and 68.6% for PR, true receptor conversion was observed in 9.8%, 21.56%, and 5.88% for ER, PR, and HER2, respectively. There was a significant correlation between age and ER discordance ( p  = 0.029). Loss in PR significantly correlated with a gain in Ki-67. Of all the metastatic sites, the lung was significantly associated with PR and Ki-67 concordance ( p  = 0.008 and p  = 0.0425, respectively). Discordance of receptors was neither related to the sites of biopsy (local recurrence or metastatic site) nor to the time interval between biopsies, prior chemotherapy, or hormone therapy. In conclusion, metastatic progression of the disease is accompanied by age-dependent discordance of ER. Unparalleled changes in PR in relation to ER suggest that ER-independent pathways may influence PR expression in MBC. Furthermore, the concurrence of PR loss with Ki-67 gain indicates an aggressive phenotype with disease progression. Hence, follow-up testing of samples for receptor expression is beneficial in determining prognosis and guiding therapeutic decisions.

The Significance of Recognition of Human Epidermal Growth Factor 2 Low in Breast Cancer Therapy

In response to recent clinical trials that demonstrate the clinical benefit of antibody-drug conjugate drug therapy in breast cancer (BC) with human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) immunohistochemical scores of 1+ or 2+ and negative in situ hybridization results, a new concept of "HER2-low BC" has emerged to describe this newly relevant therapeutic category of BC. Clinical recognition of HER2-low BC has caused a paradigm shift in the therapeutic landscape and management of patients with BC and resulted in rapid changes in clinical practice guidelines. In addition the American Society of Clinical Oncology-College of American Pathologists (ASCO-CAP) recently updated their HER2 Guidelines Recommendations to specifically address HER2-low BC. A literature search in PubMed of peer-reviewed articles, regulatory communications, and relevant practice guidelines pertaining to HER2-low BC was conducted. In this review, we have summarized current published knowledge regarding the clinicopathologic and molecular features, diagnostic criteria, and most current guideline recommendations regarding HER2-low BC, and also highlight ongoing practical and diagnostic challenges when identifying HER2-low BC in routine clinical practice.

A prediction model for distant metastasis after isolated locoregional recurrence of breast cancer

PURPOSE

The impact of progesterone receptor (PR) status on the prognosis of breast cancer after isolated locoregional recurrence (ILRR) remains unclear. This study evaluated the impact of clinicopathologic factors, including PR status of ILRR, on distant metastasis (DM) after ILRR.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 306 patients with ILRR diagnosed at the National Cancer Center Hospital between 1993 and 2021 from the database. Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed to examine factors associated with DM after ILRR. We developed a risk prediction model based on the number of detected risk factors and estimated survival curves using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up time of 4.7 years after ILRR diagnosis, 86 patients developed DM, and 50 died. Multivariate analysis revealed that seven risk factors were associated with poor distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS): estrogen receptor-positive/PR-negative/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative ILRR, short disease-free interval, recurrence site other than ipsilateral breast, no-resection of ILRR tumor, chemotherapy for the primary tumor, nodal stage in the primary tumor, and no endocrine therapy for ILRR. The predictive model classified patients into 4 groups based on the number of risk factors: low-, intermediate-, high-, and the highest-risk groups with 0 to 1, 2, 3 to 4, and 5 to 7 factors, respectively. This revealed significant variation in DMFS among the groups. A higher number of the risk factors was associated with poorer DMFS.

CONCLUSION

Our prediction model, which considered the ILRR receptor status, may contribute to the development of a treatment strategy for ILRR.

Discordance in receptor status between primary and metastatic breast cancer and overall survival: A single-center analysis

BACKGROUND

The tumor phenotype may change between primary and metastatic breast cancer. We compared the expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2 in a series of primary breast carcinomas (PBC) with their metastatic relapses and analyzed the impact of any changes on survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

It was a single-center retrospective study, collecting consecutive cases of metastatic breast carcinoma diagnosed in the pathology and medical oncology departments at Habib Bourguiba University Hospital in Sfax, Tunisia. An immunohistochemical study was used to assess ER, PR, and HER2 expression. Overall survival (OS) and post-metastasis survival (PMS) were evaluated using multivariable Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

Our study included 68 patients. ER and PR status changed in 29.4 % and 39.7 % of cases, respectively. Conversions were mainly from positive to negative status (22 % and 23.5 % for ER and PR, respectively). Differences in HER2 status were observed in 19.6 % of cases, with loss of overexpression in 6 patients (10.7 %). Adjuvant trastuzumab therapy and PBC molecular subtype (HR-, HER2+) were associated with HER2 status discordance (p = 0.02 and 0.03, respectively). On multivariable analysis, HR-negative conversion tumors were significantly associated with a worse OS (p = 0.042) and PMS (p < 0.001), compared to HR-concordant positive tumors.

CONCLUSION

This study establishes that HR and HER2 status discordance between primary and metastatic breast carcinoma has a prognostic impact on patient outcome. Analyzing these receptors' status in all newly diagnosed cases of metastatic breast carcinoma is strongly recommended and would provide information for changing treatment strategies.