1
|
Romelus J, McLaughlin C, Ruggieri D, Morgan S. A Narrative Review of Cervical Cancer Screening Utilization Among Haitian Immigrant Women in the U.S.: Health Beliefs, Perceptions, and Societal Barriers and Facilitators. J Immigr Minor Health 2024; 26:596-603. [PMID: 38308798 DOI: 10.1007/s10903-024-01581-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2024]
Abstract
Haitian immigrant women living in the U.S. have a higher rate of cervical cancer mortality than any other ethnic group, primarily due to lower rates of screening test utilization. Therefore, it is important to understand the issues affecting their pap smear screening behaviors. We conducted a narrative review of articles from PubMed, SCOPUS, Embase, CINAHL/Nursing, and Psych Info. Inclusion criteria: U.S. Haitian immigrant, screening, cervical cancer, health beliefs/perceptions. Exclusion criteria: HPV-vaccine. Primary barriers: (1) lack of knowledge of cervical cancer, HPV, and pap smears; (2) lack of culturally appropriate dissemination of information; and (3) difficulty obtaining the test. Primary facilitators: (1) provider recommendations, (2) Haitian media to disseminate health information, and (3) having health insurance. This review highlights the points for intervention by health professionals and policy makers to address this group's low pap smear utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juana Romelus
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Carol McLaughlin
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Dominique Ruggieri
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sherry Morgan
- Penn Libraries, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Washington A, Smith L, Randall J, Anderson G. A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Cervical Cancer Screening and Prevention Interventions for African American Women: Implications for Promoting Health Equity. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2024; 33:409-425. [PMID: 38394289 DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2023.0635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
African American women suffer under the burden of cervical cancer as they are first in mortality, diagnosed at later stages, and have a survivorship rate that is lower than the national average. The aim of our review is to evaluate the effectiveness of cervical cancer screening and prevention interventions for African American women living in the United States and to assess their commitment to health equity. A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Scopus using MeSH terms related to cervical cancer, human papillomavirus (HPV), screening and prevention, and African Americans. This resulted in 1970 articles. Studies were included if they promoted cervical screening or prevention, sampled African American women aged 18 and over, and evaluated interventions. Among the 23 articles that met inclusion criteria, there were a wide variety of intervention strategies, that is, community health workers, patient navigation, patient reminders, self-sampling collection, and HPV vaccination. Health education interventions, when coupled with patient navigation or community health workers, were effective in promoting screening participation (odds ratio: 2.43, 95% confidence interval: 1.47-4.02). There were mixed results regarding the incorporation of health equity principles. This review supports the importance of incorporating health equity principles and community based methods in screening and prevention interventions. Future research and practice should incorporate African American women's perspectives in intervention development and implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ariel Washington
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Lisa Smith
- Grace Abbott School of Social Work, University of Nebraska Omaha, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Jill Randall
- School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Georgia Anderson
- College of Allied Health Sciences, School of Social Work, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Garg A, Galvin AM, Griner SB, Rosberger Z, Daley EM, Thompson EL. HPV self-sampling among women in the United States: preferences for implementation. Cancer Causes Control 2024; 35:167-176. [PMID: 37633857 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-023-01778-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 08/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE With the inclusion of primary HPV testing in 2018 U.S. Preventive Services Taskforce guidelines, at-home HPV self-sampling may provide a future option for cervical cancer screening, especially among hard-to-reach populations in the U.S. This study evaluated the association of implementation preferences with the willingness of at-home HPV self-sampling. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional study in 2018 among U.S. women ages 30-65 years, without a hysterectomy (n = 812). The outcome was willingness to have at-home HPV self-sampling (yes/no). Primary predictor variables (i.e., information source, methods of payment, methods of sending or receiving self-sampling kits) measured self-sampling implementation preferences. Adjusted logistic regression identified associations with willingness to have at-home HPV self-sampling. RESULTS Participants who preferred receiving information from healthcare providers (OR = 2.64; 95% CI 1.54,4.52) or from media or other sources (OR = 2.30; 95% CI 1.51,3.48) had higher HPV self-sampling willingness than participants who did not prefer those sources. Participants who did not want to pay for self-sampling (OR = 0.21; 95% CI 0.14,0.32) or did not know if they would pay for self-sampling (OR = 0.35; 95% CI 0.22,0.54) had lower odds of HPV self-sampling willingness compared to participants willing to pay. Participants who did not know which method they preferred for receiving a self-sampling kit (OR = 0.15, 95% CI 0.07,0.31) or preferred delivering the sample to the lab themselves (OR = 0.59; 95% CI 0.36,0.96) had lower odds for self-sampling willingness compared to participants who preferred the mail. CONCLUSION Understanding the preferences of women regarding the implementation of HPV self-sampling can improve uptake in cervical cancer screening, especially among hard-to-reach populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashvita Garg
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of North Texas Health Science Center, 3500 Camp Bowie Blvd, Fort Worth, TX, 76107, USA.
- Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
| | - Annalynn M Galvin
- Department of Health Behavior and Health Systems, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA
- Department of Research, Cizik School of Nursing, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Stacey B Griner
- Department of Health Behavior and Health Systems, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA
| | - Zeev Rosberger
- Department of Oncology, Psychiatry and Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Ellen M Daley
- College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Erika L Thompson
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of North Texas Health Science Center, 3500 Camp Bowie Blvd, Fort Worth, TX, 76107, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mehdizadeh-Maraghi R, Nemati-Anaraki L. Application of Problematic Integration Theory in Health Communication: A Scoping Review. HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2023:1-27. [PMID: 37981577 DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2023.2281078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2023]
Abstract
Problematic integration theory is a theory in communication that deals with the processing of messages by humans. It is helpful to study challenges and their solutions in the health communication context to develop effective relationships, treat patients, and, ultimately, ensure the well-being of society. A scoping review was conducted. Three databases were searched following the PRISMA-ScR statement without a time frame. Independent screening of titles, abstracts, and full texts was performed, and the studies selected based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria were assessed. The required information was then extracted from the studies and entered into Excel software. A total of 43 studies related to PI theory were identified in the databases. The results indicated that PI theory is used to interpret feelings, beliefs, challenges, concerns, and problematic dilemmas in five thematic categories: elderly care, cancer care, infertility, pregnancy, and childbirth care, illness care, and sexual care. Each of the papers also offers distinctive and valuable considerations for interventions such as communication strategies, coping mechanisms, uncertainty and certainty management, information management, education, training, support groups, and campaigns to improve decision-making and meet the challenges of health communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Razieh Mehdizadeh-Maraghi
- Department of Medical Library and Information Science, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences
| | - Leila Nemati-Anaraki
- Department of Medical Library and Information Science, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences
- Health Management and Economics Research Center, Health Management Research Institute, Iran University of Medical Sciences
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zigras T, Mayrand MH, Bouchard C, Salvador S, Eiriksson L, Almadin C, Kean S, Dean E, Malhotra U, Todd N, Fontaine D, Bentley J. Canadian Guideline on the Management of a Positive Human Papillomavirus Test and Guidance for Specific Populations. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:5652-5679. [PMID: 37366908 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30060425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Revised: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 05/29/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to provide evidence-based guidance on the management of a positive human papilloma virus (HPV) test and to provide guidance around screening and HPV testing for specific patient populations. The guideline was developed by a working group in collaboration with the Gynecologic Oncology Society of Canada (GOC), Society of Colposcopists of Canada (SCC), and the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer. The literature informing these guidelines was obtained through a systematic review of relevant literature by a multi-step search process led by an information specialist. The literature was reviewed up to July 2021 with manual searches of relevant national guidelines and more recent publications. The quality of the evidence and strength of recommendations were developed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. The intended users of this guideline include primary care providers, gynecologists, colposcopists, screening programs, and healthcare facilities. The implementation of the recommendations will ensure an optimum implementation of HPV testing with a focus on the management of positive results. Recommendations for appropriate care for underserved and marginalized groups are made.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiffany Zigras
- Trillium Health Partners, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1E2, Canada
| | - Marie-Hélène Mayrand
- Département d'obstétrique-gynécologie, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H3C 3J7, Canada
| | - Celine Bouchard
- Clinique de Researche en Sante des femmes, Quebec City, QC G1V 3M7, Canada
| | - Shannon Salvador
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0G4, Canada
| | - Lua Eiriksson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
| | - Chelsea Almadin
- Health Innovation and Evaluation Hub, University of Montreal Hospital Research Centre, Montreal, QC H3Z 2H5, Canada
| | - Sarah Kean
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Winnipeg, MB R3J 3T7, Canada
| | - Erin Dean
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Winnipeg, MB R3J 3T7, Canada
| | - Unjali Malhotra
- Office of the Chief Medical Officer, First Nations Health Authority, West Vancouver, BC V7T 1A2, Canada
| | - Nicole Todd
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology UBC, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E1, Canada
| | - Daniel Fontaine
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Valley Regional Hospital, Kentville, NS B4N 5E3, Canada
| | - James Bentley
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Alam Z, Cairns JM, Scott M, Dean JA, Janda M. Interventions to increase cervical screening uptake among immigrant women: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0281976. [PMID: 37267330 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Accepted: 02/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Numerous intervention studies have attempted to increase cervical screening uptake among immigrant women, nonetheless their screening participation remains low. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarise the evidence on interventions to improve cervical screening among immigrant women globally and identify their effectiveness. Databases PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, PsycINFO, ERIC, CINAHL and CENTRAL were systematically searched from inception to October 12, 2021, for intervention studies, including randomised and clinical controlled trials (RCT, CCT) and one and two group pre-post studies. Peer-reviewed studies involving immigrant and refugee women, in community and clinical settings, were eligible. Comparator interventions were usual or minimal care or attention control. Data extraction, quality appraisal and risk of bias were assessed by two authors independently using COVIDENCE software. Narrative synthesis of findings was carried out, with the main outcome measure defined as the cervical screening uptake rate difference pre- and post-intervention followed by random effects meta-analysis of trials and two group pre-post studies, using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software, to calculate pooled rate ratios and adjustment for publication bias, where found. The protocol followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered prospectively with PROSPERO (CRD42020192341). 1,900 studies were identified, of which 42 (21 RCTS, 4 CCTs, and 16 pre-post studies) with 44,224 participants, were included in the systematic review, and 28 with 35,495 participants in the meta-analysis. Overall, the uptake difference rate for interventions ranged from -6.7 to 96%. Meta-analysis demonstrated a pooled rate ratio of 1.15 (95% CI 1.03-1.29), with high heterogeneity. Culturally sensitive, multicomponent interventions, using different modes of information delivery and self-sampling modality were most promising. Interventions led to at least 15% increase in cervical screening participation among immigrant women. Interventions designed to overcome logistical barriers and use multiple channels to communicate culturally appropriate health promotion messages are most effective at achieving cervical screening uptake among immigrant women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zufishan Alam
- Centre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | | | - Marissa Scott
- School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Judith Ann Dean
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Monika Janda
- Centre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pretsch PK, Spees LP, Brewer NT, Hudgens MG, Sanusi B, Rohner E, Miller E, Jackson SL, Barclay L, Carter A, Wheeler SB, Smith JS. Effect of HPV self-collection kits on cervical cancer screening uptake among under-screened women from low-income US backgrounds (MBMT-3): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Public Health 2023; 8:e411-e421. [PMID: 37182529 PMCID: PMC10283467 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-2667(23)00076-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Revised: 03/21/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most cervical cancer in the USA occurs in under-screened women. The My Body, My Test-3 (MBMT-3) trial sought to assess the efficacy of mailed human papillomavirus (HPV) self-collection kits with appointment-scheduling assistance to increase uptake of cervical cancer screening among under-screened women from low-income backgrounds compared with scheduling assistance alone. METHODS MBMT-3 is a phase 3, open-label, two-arm, randomised controlled trial. Participants were recruited from 22 counties in North Carolina state, USA, and we partnered with 21 clinics across these counties. Participants were eligible for inclusion if they were aged 25-64 years, had an intact cervix, were uninsured or enrolled in Medicaid or Medicare, had an income of 250% or less of the US Federal Poverty Level, were living within the catchment area of a trial-associated clinic, and were overdue for screening (ie, Papanicolaou test ≥4 years ago or high-risk HPV test ≥6 years ago). Participants were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive a mailed HPV self-collection kit and assistance for scheduling a free screening appointment (intervention group) or to receive scheduling assistance alone (control group). Randomisation was conducted by county using permuted blocks of nine patients and assignment to group was not masked. Participants in the intervention group were mailed HPV self-collection kits to collect a cervical-vaginal sample and return it by mail for testing. Samples were tested with the Aptima HPV assay (Hologic, San Diego, CA, USA), and participants were informed of high-risk HPV results by telephone call. Trial staff made up to three telephone call attempts to provide scheduling assistance for in-clinic screening for all participants. The primary outcome was cervical cancer screening uptake (ie, attending an in-clinic screening appointment or testing negative for high-risk HPV with a returned self-collected sample) within 6 months of enrolment in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02651883, and has been completed. FINDINGS Recruitment occurred between April 11, 2016, and Dec 16, 2019. 4256 women contacted the trial to participate, of whom 899 (21%) were eligible for inclusion and 697 (78%) returned consent forms. Of those who consented, 461 (66%) women were randomly assigned to the intervention group and 236 (34%) women were randomly assigned to the control group. We excluded 32 ineligible women post-randomisation, leaving 665 for primary analysis. Screening uptake was higher in the intervention group (317 [72%] of 438) than control group (85 [37%] of 227; risk ratio 1·93, 95% CI 1·62-2·31). Among intervention participants, 341 (78%) of 438 returned a self-collection kit. Three participants reported hurt or injury when using the self-collection kit; no participants withdrew due to adverse effects. INTERPRETATION Among under-screened women from low-income backgrounds, mailed HPV self-collection kits with scheduling assistance led to greater uptake of cervical cancer screening than scheduling assistance alone. At-home HPV self-collection testing has the potential to increase screening uptake among under-screened women. FUNDING National Cancer Institute.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peyton K Pretsch
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Lisa P Spees
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Gillings School of Global Public Health and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Noel T Brewer
- Department of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Gillings School of Global Public Health and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Michael G Hudgens
- Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Busola Sanusi
- Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Eliane Rohner
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Elyse Miller
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Sarah L Jackson
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Lynn Barclay
- American Sexual Health Association, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Alicia Carter
- Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, Burlington, NC, USA
| | - Stephanie B Wheeler
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Gillings School of Global Public Health and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Jennifer S Smith
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Gillings School of Global Public Health and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Meenan RT, Troja C, Buist DSM, Tiro JA, Lin J, Anderson ML, Gao H, Green BB, Winer RL. Economic Evaluation of Mailed Home-Based Human Papillomavirus Self-sampling Kits for Cervical Cancer Screening. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e234052. [PMID: 36947040 PMCID: PMC10034577 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.4052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling addresses barriers to cervical cancer screening, and mailed self-sampling kits have been reported to increase screening uptake. International research suggests mailed kits are cost-effective in certain settings. However, the cost-effectiveness of mailing HPV self-sampling kits for increasing screening uptake has not been evaluated in the US. Objective To conduct an economic evaluation of a mailed HPV self-sampling intervention among underscreened women enrolled in an integrated US health care system. Design, Setting, and Participants This economic evaluation involved a cost-effectiveness analysis of results from a randomized clinical trial of 19 851 women aged 30 to 64 years enrolled in a health plan from Kaiser Permanente Washington (KPWA), a US-based integrated health care system. Women were identified through electronic medical records, and eligible participants were enrolled in a health plan for at least 3 years and 5 months, had a primary care clinician, had not received a Papanicolaou test for at least 3 years and 5 months, and had not received a hysterectomy. Enrollment occurred from February 25, 2014, to August 29, 2016, with follow-up through February 25, 2018. The current economic evaluation was conducted between August 2, 2021, and July 30, 2022. Intervention delivery costs were calculated from both the KPWA and Medicare perspectives and were based on either wellness visit or Papanicolaou test-only visit costs. Intervention Participants in the control group received usual care, which comprised patient reminders and ad hoc outreach for screening. Participants in the intervention group received usual care plus a mailed HPV self-sampling kit. Main Outcome and Measures The primary economic outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for increased screening uptake, defined as the incremental difference in cost (intervention group minus control group) divided by the difference in the number of participants completing screening (intervention group minus control group) within 6 months of randomization. Results Among 19 851 women (mean [SD] age, 50.1 [9.5] years; 76.7% White), 9960 were randomized to the intervention group, and 9891 were randomized to the control group. Baseline ICERs ranged from $85.84 (95% CI, $85.68-$85.99) using KPWA wellness visits as the cost basis to $146.29 (95% CI, $146.20-$146.38) using Medicare Papanicolaou test-only visits as the cost source. Subgroups of participants aged 50 to 64 years and participants most recently overdue for screening achieved cost-effectiveness at lower levels of willingness to pay for an additional completed screening than other subgroups. Conclusions and Relevance In this economic evaluation, mailing HPV self-sampling kits to women overdue for cervical cancer screening was cost-effective for increased screening uptake relative to usual care. These results support mailing HPV kits as an efficient outreach strategy for increasing screening rates among eligible women in US health care systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard T Meenan
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon
| | - Catherine Troja
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle
| | - Diana S M Buist
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle
| | - Jasmin A Tiro
- Department of Clinical Sciences, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
| | - John Lin
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle
| | | | - Hongyuan Gao
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle
| | - Beverly B Green
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle
- Washington Permanente Medical Group, Seattle
- Department of Health Systems Science, Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, California
| | - Rachel L Winer
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sanchez-Covarrubias AP, Crane J, Montgomerie EK, Potter JE, Duthely LM, Bahadue F, Jeudin PP. Examining 5-Year Cervical Cytology Progression Among Minority Women Living With HIV and Baseline Negative Cytology. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2022; 26:304-309. [PMID: 36126202 PMCID: PMC9508966 DOI: 10.1097/lgt.0000000000000694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Women living with HIV (WLWH) have increased risk of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, precancers, and invasive cervical cancers. This study aims to determine the rate of cervical cytologic progression and related factors in minority WLWH across 5 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS We used our HIV clinic database, complemented with a retrospective chart review to identify WLWH with a baseline negative cervical cytology between 2009 and 2012 and 5-year follow-up. Data included race/ethnicity, age, years living with HIV, AIDS status, viral load, history of smoking, drug use, and HPV status. Multivariate logistic regression tested progression of negative cytology to low-grade/high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LGSIL/HGSIL). RESULTS Among 162 WLWH, 42% were African American, 30% non-Hispanic African Caribbean, and 26% Hispanic. At baseline, 21% had detectable viral load (>200 cp/mL), mean age was 44.8 (±11 years), and mean years living with HIV was 9.6 (±6.9). After 5 years, 19% of the cohort progressed to LGSIL/HGSIL. Human papillomavirus was detected consistently among women with cytologic changes (30% vs 7%, p < .01). Significant factors that predicted higher likelihood of progression to LGSIL/HGSIL were detection of HPV (adjusted odds ratios = 5.11 [1.31-19.93]; p = .02), and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-defined AIDS status (adjusted odds ratios = 4.28 [1.04-17.63]; p = .04). Of the women who maintained negative cytology at 1 to 2 years (n = 102), 5 women (5%) progressed during the following 3 years before the recommended follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Human papillomavirus detection and AIDS status were significant factors predicting progression to LGSIL/HGSIL among minority WLWH. Providers screening WLWH for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia should carefully decide screening intervals for minority populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex P. Sanchez-Covarrubias
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL
| | - Joshua Crane
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington DC
| | | | - JoNell E. Potter
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL
- Division of Research and Special Projects, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Miami, Miami, FL
| | - Lunthita M. Duthely
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL
- Division of Research and Special Projects, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Miami, Miami, FL
| | - Felicia Bahadue
- Division of Research and Special Projects, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Miami, Miami, FL
| | - Patricia P. Jeudin
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hiatt RA, Kobetz EN, Paskett ED. Catchment Areas, Community Outreach and Engagement Revisited: The 2021 Guidelines for Cancer Center Support Grants from the National Cancer Institute. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2022; 15:349-354. [PMID: 35652232 DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-22-0034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2022] [Revised: 03/18/2022] [Accepted: 03/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
New guidelines for Cancer Center Support Grants have recently been issued by the NCI that require increased attention to cancer center catchment areas and their community outreach and engagement activities [PAR-21-321]. Past experience with these requirements has engendered some confusion and frustration on the part of both researchers and reviewers that these new guidelines aim to dispel. In this commentary we, as experienced cancer center leaders in population sciences, offer our views on the most important aspects of the new guidelines and provide three examples of the kinds of programs that can apply cancer prevention and control research to improve cancer population health. With 71 NCI-Designated Cancer Centers in 36 states, the potential for broad impact on the reduction of the nation's cancer burden is enormous if the intended application of cancer center research to individuals and populations is fulfilled.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert A Hiatt
- Associate Director for Population Sciences, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, Professor, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Erin N Kobetz
- Associate Director of Population Science and Cancer Disparities, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vice Provost for Research, Professor, Departments of Medicine, Public Health Sciences, and Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Miami, Florida
| | - Electra D Paskett
- Associate Director for Population Sciences, Program Leader, Cancer Control Program, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Marion N. Rowley Professor of Cancer Research, Director, Center for Cancer Health Equity, James Cancer Hospital, Professor, Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Zhang J, Tian X, Chen Y, Huang S, Cui Z, Tian R, Zeng Z, Liang W, Gong Q, Shang R, Hu Z, Cao C. Feasibility and Accuracy of Menstrual Blood Testing for High-risk Human Papillomavirus Detection With Capture Sequencing. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2140644. [PMID: 34940863 PMCID: PMC8703251 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.40644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE High-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) persistent infection is the major etiology of cervical precancer and cancer. Noninvasive self-sampling HPV testing is a promising alternative cervical cancer screening for avoiding stigma and improving patient willingness to participate. OBJECTIVE To investigate the feasibility and accuracy of menstrual blood (MB) hrHPV capture sequencing in hrHPV detection. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cohort study collected 137 sanitary pads from 120 women who were premenopausal and had hrHPV as detected by cervical HPV GenoArray testing. Patients were recruited from September 1, 2020, to April 1, 2021, at Central Hospital of Wuhan, China. Target capture sequencing was performed to determine hrHPV genotypes in MB. Sanger sequencing was performed as the criterion standard for detecting hrHPV genotypes among enrolled women. Data were analyzed from April 1 through June 1, 2021. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Complete concordance, incomplete concordance, and discordance of MB hrHPV capture sequencing and conventional HPV testing were defined according to genotype overlapping levels. Concordance of the 2 detection methods and comparative power of MB hrHPV capture sequencing during different menstrual cycle days (MCDs) were the main outcomes. RESULTS A total of 120 enrolled women with hrHPV (mean [SD; range] age, 33.9 [6.9; 20.0 -52.0] years) provided 137 sanitary pads. The overall concordance rate of MB hrHPV capture sequencing and cervical HPV testing was 92.7% (95% CI, 88.3%-97.1%), with a κ value of 0.763 (P < .001). Among 24 samples with incomplete concordance or discordant results, 11 samples with additional hrHPV genotypes (45.8%), 5 true-negative samples (20.8%), and the correct hrHPV genotypes of 2 samples (8.3%) were correctly identified by MB hrHPV capture sequencing. MB hrHPV detection of hrHPV was equivalent on different MCDs, with an MB hrHPV-positive rate of 27 of 28 patients (96.4%) for MCD 1, 52 of 57 patients (91.2%) for MCD 2, 27 of 28 patients for MCD 3, 4 of 4 patients (100%) for MCD 4, and 3 of 3 patients (100%) for MCD 5 (P = .76). The sensitivity of the MB hrHPV capture sequencing was 97.7% (95% CI, 95.0%-100%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE These findings suggest that MB hrHPV capture sequencing is a feasible and accurate self-collected approach for cervical cancer screening. This study found that this method is associated with superior performance in identification of HPV genotypes and true-negative events compared with cervical HPV testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingjing Zhang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xun Tian
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Academician Expert Workstation, Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Ye Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Sisi Huang
- Medical Examination Center, Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Zifeng Cui
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Rui Tian
- Center for Translational Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhen Zeng
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Academician Expert Workstation, Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Wenjia Liang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Academician Expert Workstation, Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Qifen Gong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Academician Expert Workstation, Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- School of Medicine, Jianghan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Ronghua Shang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Academician Expert Workstation, Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- School of Medicine, Jianghan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Zheng Hu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Sun Yat-sen University Nanchang Research Institute, Nanchang, China
| | - Chen Cao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Academician Expert Workstation, Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Croswell JM, Corley DA, Lafata JE, Haas JS, Inadomi JM, Kamineni A, Ritzwoller DP, Vachani A, Zheng Y. Cancer screening in the U.S. through the COVID-19 pandemic, recovery, and beyond. Prev Med 2021; 151:106595. [PMID: 34217414 PMCID: PMC8722181 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2021] [Revised: 04/29/2021] [Accepted: 05/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
COVID-19 has proved enormously disruptive to the provision of cancer screening, which does not just represent an initial test but an entire process, including risk detection, diagnostic follow-up, and treatment. Successful delivery of services at all points in the process has been negatively affected by the pandemic. There is a void in empirical high-quality evidence to support a specific strategy for administering cancer screening during a pandemic and its resolution phase, but several pragmatic considerations can help guide prioritization efforts. Targeting guideline-eligible people who have never been screened, or those who are significantly out of date with screening, has the potential to maximize benefits now and into the future. Disruptions to care due to the pandemic could represent an unparalleled opportunity to reassess early detection programs towards an explicit, thoughtful, and just prioritization of populations historically experiencing cancer disparities. By focusing screening services on populations that have the most to gain, and by careful and deliberate planning for the period following the pandemic, we can positively affect cancer outcomes for all.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer M Croswell
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, USA.
| | - Douglas A Corley
- The Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Permanente, Northern California, USA
| | - Jennifer Elston Lafata
- University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center and Eshelman School of Pharmacy, USA
| | - Jennifer S Haas
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, USA
| | - John M Inadomi
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, USA
| | - Aruna Kamineni
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, USA
| | | | - Anil Vachani
- Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Yingye Zheng
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Fang CY, Ragin CC. Addressing Disparities in Cancer Screening among U.S. Immigrants: Progress and Opportunities. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2021; 13:253-260. [PMID: 32132119 DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-19-0249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2019] [Revised: 09/08/2019] [Accepted: 10/10/2019] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
The United States is home to 47 million foreign-born individuals, which currently represents over 14% of the U.S. population. With greater length of U.S. residence, immigrants experience increased risk for chronic disease including selected cancers; yet, they are less likely to access preventive health care services and undergo cancer screening. As a result, there have been concerted efforts to address disparities in cancer screening in immigrant populations. This minireview describes current progress in promoting participation in cancer screening among U.S. immigrants and explores potential opportunities for improving impact. Of the 42 studies included in the review, the majority targeted Asian and Latino immigrant populations and included some form of culturally specific educational programming, often delivered in-person by community health workers and/or using a multimedia format. Twenty-eight of the 42 studies also offered navigation assistance to help overcome logistical and access barriers to care, and these studies yielded somewhat greater increases in screening. Yet, despite considerable effort over the past 20+ years, screening rates remain well below national goals. Opportunities to harness digital health tools to increase awareness and engagement, evaluating nonclinic-based screening paradigms to promote greater participation, and increasing efforts to address the needs of other immigrant subgroups are likely to have beneficial outcomes. Together, these strategies may help reduce inequities in access and uptake of cancer screening in U.S. immigrant populations.See all articles in this Special Collection Honoring Paul F. Engstrom, MD, Champion of Cancer Prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolyn Y Fang
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
| | - Camille C Ragin
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Campos NG, Scarinci IC, Tucker L, Peral S, Li Y, Regan MC, Sy S, Castle PE, Kim JJ. Cost-Effectiveness of Offering Cervical Cancer Screening with HPV Self-Sampling among African-American Women in the Mississippi Delta. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2021; 30:1114-1121. [PMID: 33771846 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-20-1673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2020] [Revised: 02/08/2021] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND African-American women in the United States have an elevated risk of cervical cancer incidence and mortality. In the Mississippi Delta, cervical cancer disparities are particularly stark. METHODS We conducted a micro-costing study alongside a group randomized trial that evaluated the efficacy of a patient-centered approach ("Choice" between self-collection at home for HPV testing or current standard of care within the public health system in Mississippi) versus the current standard of care ["Standard-of-care screening," involving cytology (i.e., Pap) and HPV co-testing at the Health Department clinics]. The interventions in both study arms were delivered by community health workers (CHW). Using cost, screening uptake, and colposcopy adherence data from the trial, we informed a mathematical model of HPV infection and cervical carcinogenesis to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing the "Choice" and "Standard-of-care screening" interventions among un/underscreened African-American women in the Mississippi Delta. RESULTS When each intervention was simulated every 5 years from ages 25 to 65 years, the "Standard-of-care screening" strategy reduced cancer risk by 6.4% and was not an efficient strategy; "Choice" was more effective and efficient, reducing lifetime risk of cervical cancer by 14.8% and costing $62,720 per year of life saved (YLS). Screening uptake and colposcopy adherence were key drivers of intervention cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS Offering "Choice" to un/underscreened African-American women in the Mississippi Delta led to greater uptake than CHW-facilitated screening at the Health Department, and may be cost-effective. IMPACT We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of an HPV self-collection intervention to reduce disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole G Campos
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | - Isabel C Scarinci
- Division of Preventive Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Laura Tucker
- Mississippi State Department of Health, Jackson, Mississippi
| | - Sylvia Peral
- Division of Preventive Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Yufeng Li
- Division of Preventive Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Mary Caroline Regan
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Stephen Sy
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Philip E Castle
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Jane J Kim
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Julian McFarlane S, Morgan SE, Schlumbrecht M. Acceptability of a multicomponent, community-based, HPV self-test intervention among Jamaican women. Cancer Causes Control 2021; 32:547-554. [PMID: 33660168 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-021-01406-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2020] [Accepted: 02/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Jamaican women do not participate in routine Pap test screening as recommended, despite the availability of free Pap test services at community clinics. This low uptake has been associated with cultural and structural barriers such as limited knowledge and awareness, fear of pain associated with Pap tests, fear of diagnosis, modesty or self-consciousness, medical mistrust, and discontent with healthcare services. This study suggests that a multicomponent, community-based intervention that includes education and self-testing for the virus that causes cervical cancer (i.e., Human Papillomavirus, HPV) might increase screening rates. Community outreach workers were hired and recruited 163 women from two low socioeconomic status communities in Kingston, aged 30 to 65 years, and who had not had a Pap test in at least 3 years, to use an HPV self-test kit. Almost all the women (95.6%) used and returned the kit and reported in structured interviews that it was easy to use and preferable to visiting a doctor. Paired samples t-tests revealed that participants perceived higher threat of cervical cancer, greater susceptibility to cancer, greater sense of self-efficacy, and more positive screening social norms at post-test than at pretest. Among returners, 22% had an oncogenic HPV type detected in their sample. Findings demonstrate high acceptability of the HPV self-test among Jamaican women and, therefore, the potential of HPV self-test tools to increase screening uptake. Community-based approaches to disseminate this tool, such as outreach workers and educational small group sessions, appear to be culturally appropriate and effective in this context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soroya Julian McFarlane
- Department of Communication Studies, University of Georgia, 602 Caldwell Hall, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.
| | - Susan E Morgan
- Department of Communication Studies, Communication International Building, University of Miami, Room 5051D, Coral Gables, FL, 33124, USA
| | - Matthew Schlumbrecht
- Miller School of Medicine, The University of Miami, 1121 NW 14th St, Suite 345C, Miami, FL, 33136, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Elmore CE, Laughon K, Mitchell EM. Self-collection of samples for HPV testing to increase participation in cervical cancer screening by immigrant women: An integrative review. Public Health Nurs 2020; 37:677-695. [PMID: 32744371 DOI: 10.1111/phn.12782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2020] [Revised: 07/10/2020] [Accepted: 07/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine methods and results of studies assessing self-collection of cervico-vaginal samples for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing by immigrant women for insights into how future research using this method with unique subpopulations of women may improve the rates of cervical cancer screening (CCS) compared to current strategies. DATA SOURCES Four electronic databases were systematically searched through March 2020, with no limits applied. A manual review of reference lists was also completed. STUDY SELECTION The search resulted in 63 articles. After removal of duplicates, 36 were reviewed against inclusion criteria. A manual review of reference lists yielded two additional studies. The final sample included 15 relevant publications representing 13 unique empirical studies. DATA EXTRACTION Data related to study methodology and empirical results were extracted into table form. DATA SYNTHESIS The methods of the studies were summarized and synthesized, including diversity of participants, community engagement, including collaboration with public health nurses or community health workers. In addition, methods and findings related to the educational components of the studies, and empirical findings related to various cultural groups, were described. CONCLUSION To reduce health disparities in CCS, researchers should focus on diverse groups, such as immigrant women, to understand important individual and group-specific factors that may influence screening, including whether self-collection of samples for HPV testing along with appropriate education and support for follow-up will address these factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kathryn Laughon
- University of Virginia School of Nursing, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Carrasquillo O, Seay J, Jhaveri V, Long T, Kenya S, Thomas E, Sussman D, Trevil D, Koru-Sengul T, Kobetz E. Increasing uptake of evidence-based screening services though a community health worker-delivered multimodality program: study protocol for a randomized pragmatic trial. Trials 2020; 21:368. [PMID: 32349789 PMCID: PMC7191705 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-4213-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2020] [Accepted: 02/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Underserved ethnic minority populations experience significant disparities in HIV, hepatitis C virus (HCV), colorectal cancer (CRC), and cervical cancer incidence and mortality. Much of the excess burden of these diseases among underserved communities is due to lack of preventive care, including screening. Barriers to disease screening include low awareness, lack of access to care and health insurance, and cultural beliefs regarding disease prevention. Our current trial aims to examine community health worker (CHW)-delivered, home-based multi-modality screening for HIV, HCV, CRC, and cervical cancer simultaneously. DESIGN We are conducting a randomized pragmatic trial among 900 Haitian, Hispanic, and African-American participants from diverse underserved communities in South Florida. People between the ages of 50 and 65 who have not had appropriate HIV, HCV, CRC, and cervical cancer screening per United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendations are eligible for the study. Participants are recruited by CHWs and complete a structured interview to assess multilevel determinants of disease risk. Participants are then randomized to receive HIV, HCV, CRC, and cervical cancer screening via navigation to care by a CHW (Group 1) or via CHW-delivered home-based screening (Group 2). The primary outcome is completion of screening for each of these diseases within 6 months post-enrollment. DISCUSSION Our trial is among the first to examine the effectiveness of a CHW-delivered, multimodality, home-based disease-screening approach. If found to be effective, this approach may represent a cost-effective strategy for disease screening within underserved and underscreened minority groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinical Trials.gov # NCT02970136, registered November 21, 2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olveen Carrasquillo
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Clinical Research Building, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, 1120 NW 14th Street, Miami, FL 33136 USA
- Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1120 NW 14th Street, Miami, FL 33136 USA
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1120 NW 14th Street, Miami, FL 33136 USA
| | - Julia Seay
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Clinical Research Building, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, 1120 NW 14th Street, Miami, FL 33136 USA
- Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1120 NW 14th Street, Miami, FL 33136 USA
| | - Vasanti Jhaveri
- Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1120 NW 14th Street, Miami, FL 33136 USA
| | - Timothy Long
- Health Choice Network, 9064 N.W. 13 Terrace, Miami, FL 33172 USA
| | - Sonjia Kenya
- Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1120 NW 14th Street, Miami, FL 33136 USA
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1120 NW 14th Street, Miami, FL 33136 USA
| | - Emmanuel Thomas
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Clinical Research Building, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, 1120 NW 14th Street, Miami, FL 33136 USA
- Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1120 NW 14th Street, Miami, FL 33136 USA
| | - Daniel Sussman
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Clinical Research Building, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, 1120 NW 14th Street, Miami, FL 33136 USA
- Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1120 NW 14th Street, Miami, FL 33136 USA
| | - Dinah Trevil
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Clinical Research Building, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, 1120 NW 14th Street, Miami, FL 33136 USA
| | - Tulay Koru-Sengul
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Clinical Research Building, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, 1120 NW 14th Street, Miami, FL 33136 USA
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1120 NW 14th Street, Miami, FL 33136 USA
| | - Erin Kobetz
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Clinical Research Building, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, 1120 NW 14th Street, Miami, FL 33136 USA
- Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1120 NW 14th Street, Miami, FL 33136 USA
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1120 NW 14th Street, Miami, FL 33136 USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Malone C, Barnabas RV, Buist DSM, Tiro JA, Winer RL. Cost-effectiveness studies of HPV self-sampling: A systematic review. Prev Med 2020; 132:105953. [PMID: 31911163 PMCID: PMC7219564 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2019] [Revised: 12/06/2019] [Accepted: 12/16/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
HPV self-sampling (HPV-SS) can increase cervical cancer screening participation by addressing barriers in high- and low- and middle-income settings. Successful implementation of HPV-SS programs will depend on understanding potential costs and health effects. Our objectives were to summarize the methods and results of published HPV-SS cost and cost-effectiveness studies, present implications of these results for HPV-SS program implementation, and identify knowledge gaps. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. One reviewer searched online databases for articles published through June 12, 2019, identified eligible studies, and extracted data; a second reviewer checked extracted data for accuracy. Eligible studies used an economic model to compare HPV-SS outreach strategies to standard-of-care tests. Of 16 eligible studies, 14 reported HPV-SS could be a cost-effective strategy. Studies differed in model type, HPV-SS delivery methods, triage strategies for positive results, and target populations. Most (9/16) modeled HPV-SS in European screening programs, 6/16 targeted women who were underscreened for cervical cancer, and 5/16 modeled HPV-SS in low- and middle-income countries. The most commonly identified driver of HPV-SS cost-effectiveness was the level of increase in cervical cancer screening attendance. Lower HPV-SS material and testing costs, higher sensitivity to detect cervical precancer, and longer duration of underscreening among HPV-SS users were also associated with increased cost-effectiveness. Future HPV-SS models in high-income settings should explore the effect of widespread vaccination and new triage strategies such as partial HPV genotyping. Knowledge gaps remain about the cost-effectiveness of HPV-SS in low- and middle-income settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colin Malone
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Box 359933, 325 9th Ave, Seattle, WA 98104, USA.
| | - Ruanne V Barnabas
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Box 359931, 325 9th Ave, Seattle, WA 98104, USA.
| | - Diana S M Buist
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute,1730 Minor Ave, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101, USA.
| | - Jasmin A Tiro
- Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.
| | - Rachel L Winer
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Box 359933, 325 9th Ave, Seattle, WA 98104, USA; Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute,1730 Minor Ave, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Spees LP, Des Marais AC, Wheeler SB, Hudgens MG, Doughty S, Brewer NT, Smith JS. Impact of human papillomavirus (HPV) self-collection on subsequent cervical cancer screening completion among under-screened US women: MyBodyMyTest-3 protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2019; 20:788. [PMID: 31881928 PMCID: PMC6935089 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-3959-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2019] [Accepted: 12/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Screening substantially reduces cervical cancer incidence and mortality. More than half of invasive cervical cancers are attributable to infrequent screening or not screening at all. The current study, My Body My Test (MBMT), evaluates the impact of mailed kits for self-collection of samples for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing on completion of cervical cancer screening in low-income, North Carolina women overdue for cervical cancer screening. Methods/design The study will enroll at least 510 US women aged 25–64 years who report no Pap test in the last 4 years and no HPV test in the last 6 years. We will randomize participants to an intervention or control arm. The intervention arm will receive kits to self-collect a sample at home and mail it for HPV testing. In both the intervention and control arms, participants will receive assistance in scheduling an appointment for screening in clinic. Study staff will deliver HPV self-collection results by phone and assist in scheduling participants for screening in clinic. The primary outcome is completion of cervical cancer screening. Specifically, completion of screening will be defined as screening in clinic or receipt of negative HPV self-collection results. Women with HPV-negative self-collection results will be considered screening-complete. All other participants will be considered screening-complete if they obtain co-testing or Pap test screening at a study-affiliated institution or other clinic. We will assess whether the self-collection intervention influences participants’ perceived risk of cervical cancer and whether perceived risk mediates the relationship between HPV self-collection results and subsequent screening in clinic. We also will estimate the incremental cost per woman screened of offering at-home HPV self-collection kits with scheduling assistance as compared to offering scheduling assistance alone. Discussion If mailed self-collection of samples for HPV testing is an effective strategy for increasing cervical cancer screening among women overdue for screening, this method has the potential to reduce cervical cancer incidence and mortality in medically underserved women at higher risk of developing cervical cancer. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02651883, Registered on 11 January 2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa P Spees
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, 1102-G McGavran-Greenberg, CB7411, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7411, USA. .,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| | - Andrea C Des Marais
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, 2103 McGavran-Greenberg, CB7435, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7435, USA
| | - Stephanie B Wheeler
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, 1102-G McGavran-Greenberg, CB7411, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7411, USA.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Michael G Hudgens
- Department of Biostatistics, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Sarah Doughty
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, 2103 McGavran-Greenberg, CB7435, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7435, USA
| | - Noel T Brewer
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Jennifer S Smith
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. .,Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, 2103 McGavran-Greenberg, CB7435, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7435, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Pinheiro PS, Callahan KE, Koru-Sengul T, Ransdell J, Bouzoubaa L, Brown CP, Kobetz E. Risk of Cancer Death Among White, Black, and Hispanic Populations in South Florida. Prev Chronic Dis 2019; 16:E83. [PMID: 31255185 PMCID: PMC6638590 DOI: 10.5888/pcd16.180529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The cancer burden in South Florida, with a population of more than 6 million with a heavily Hispanic and large Afro-Caribbean population, has not been quantified. Methods We analyzed 2012–2016 cancer mortality data from South Florida for white, Hispanic, and black populations with disaggregation for Cuban, Puerto Rican, South American, African American, and Afro-Caribbean groups. We calculated cancer site-specific and all-sites combined age-adjusted mortality rates, and we used negative binomial regression to determine mortality rate ratios to compare South Florida’s cancer mortality rates with those of the rest of the nation. Results We analyzed 53,837 cancer deaths. Per 100,000 population, cancer mortality rates in South Florida were similar among white (173 per 100,000) and black (176 per 100,000) men and among white and black women (133 for both), and they were lowest among Hispanic men (151 per 100,000) and women (93 per 100,000). However, compared with their counterparts nationally, Hispanic residents in South Florida had higher cancer mortality rates, largely driven by Cuban residents, and mortality rates among white and black residents, especially male residents, were substantially lower. Liver cancer rates were high among white and Puerto Rican “baby boomers”; lung cancer mortality was low among all groups except Cuban men; cervical cancer was high among white, black, and Puerto Rican women. Conclusion Cancer patterns are not monochromatic in all US regions; South Florida is distinctive. Meeting the needs of an aging diverse population presents challenges for all major metropolitan areas. Expanding surveillance, increasing minority participation in clinical trials, and investing in culturally specific community-based health promotion must continue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paulo S Pinheiro
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami School of Medicine, Clinical Research Building 913, 1120 NW 14th St, Miami, FL 33136.
| | - Karen E Callahan
- School of Community Health Sciences, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Nevada
| | - Tulay Koru-Sengul
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Justine Ransdell
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Layla Bouzoubaa
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Clyde P Brown
- College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Florida A&M University, Tallahassee, Florida
| | - Erin Kobetz
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
de Pokomandy A, Burchell AN, Salters K, Ding E, O'Brien N, Bakombo DM, Proulx-Boucher K, Boucoiran I, Pick N, Ogilvie G, Loutfy M, Kaida A. Cervical cancer screening among women living with HIV: a cross-sectional study using the baseline questionnaire data from the Canadian HIV Women's Sexual and Reproductive Health Cohort Study (CHIWOS). CMAJ Open 2019; 7:E217-E226. [PMID: 30979726 PMCID: PMC6461544 DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20180151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cisgender women with HIV experience an elevated risk of cervical cancer compared with HIV-negative women, but this cancer can be prevented through regular cervical cancer screening. Our study objective was to measure adherence to current national cervical cancer screening guidelines among women with HIV in 3 Canadian provinces and identify factors associated with delays. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional study using the baseline questionnaire of the Canadian HIV Women's Sexual and Reproductive Health Cohort Study (CHIWOS). Participants were recruited through clinics, peers and community organizations in British Columbia, Ontario and Quebec. Women were eligible for inclusion if they were cisgender female with HIV, aged 21-70 years, and never had cervicectomy/hysterectomy. RESULTS Of 1189 eligible participants, 815 (68.5%) had received cervical cancer screening less than 1 year ago (i.e., as recommended), 211 (17.7%) 1-3 years ago (i.e., moderate delay) and 163 (13.7%) at least 3 years ago or never (i.e., long delay). Overall, 309 (26.0%) had never discussed the need for a Papanicolaou smear with a nurse/doctor. Factors associated with a long delay were living in Ontario (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.29-4.88) or Quebec (adjusted OR 3.70, 95% CI 1.79-7.67) (v. BC), being sexually inactive in the past 6 months (adjusted OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.25-3.25), having unknown or < 200 cells/mm3 CD4 counts (adjusted OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.11-2.85) and having a male HIV care provider (adjusted OR 2.15, 95% CI 1.36-3.42). INTERPRETATION Over one-third of women reported cervical cancer screening delays, and one-quarter had never discussed cervical cancer screening recommendations with a health care provider. Additional efforts are needed to improve women's and health care providers' awareness of cervical cancer screening recommendations, particularly among women who are sexually inactive, who are immunosuppressed and who have male HIV care providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra de Pokomandy
- Chronic Viral Illness Service (de Pokomandy, Bakombo, Proulx-Boucher), McGill University Health Centre; Department of Family Medicine (de Pokomandy, O'Brien), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Burchell), St. Michael's Hospital; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Burchell), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Health Sciences (Salters, Kaida), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; BC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS (Salters, Ding, Kaida), Vancouver, BC; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Boucoiran), Hôpital Sainte-Justine and Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Oak Tree Clinic (Pick), BC Women's Hospital; Department of Family Practice (Ogilvie), School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Women's College Research Institute (Loutfy), Women's College Hospital; Faculty of Medicine (Loutfy), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
| | - Ann N Burchell
- Chronic Viral Illness Service (de Pokomandy, Bakombo, Proulx-Boucher), McGill University Health Centre; Department of Family Medicine (de Pokomandy, O'Brien), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Burchell), St. Michael's Hospital; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Burchell), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Health Sciences (Salters, Kaida), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; BC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS (Salters, Ding, Kaida), Vancouver, BC; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Boucoiran), Hôpital Sainte-Justine and Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Oak Tree Clinic (Pick), BC Women's Hospital; Department of Family Practice (Ogilvie), School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Women's College Research Institute (Loutfy), Women's College Hospital; Faculty of Medicine (Loutfy), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Kate Salters
- Chronic Viral Illness Service (de Pokomandy, Bakombo, Proulx-Boucher), McGill University Health Centre; Department of Family Medicine (de Pokomandy, O'Brien), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Burchell), St. Michael's Hospital; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Burchell), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Health Sciences (Salters, Kaida), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; BC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS (Salters, Ding, Kaida), Vancouver, BC; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Boucoiran), Hôpital Sainte-Justine and Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Oak Tree Clinic (Pick), BC Women's Hospital; Department of Family Practice (Ogilvie), School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Women's College Research Institute (Loutfy), Women's College Hospital; Faculty of Medicine (Loutfy), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Erin Ding
- Chronic Viral Illness Service (de Pokomandy, Bakombo, Proulx-Boucher), McGill University Health Centre; Department of Family Medicine (de Pokomandy, O'Brien), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Burchell), St. Michael's Hospital; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Burchell), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Health Sciences (Salters, Kaida), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; BC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS (Salters, Ding, Kaida), Vancouver, BC; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Boucoiran), Hôpital Sainte-Justine and Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Oak Tree Clinic (Pick), BC Women's Hospital; Department of Family Practice (Ogilvie), School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Women's College Research Institute (Loutfy), Women's College Hospital; Faculty of Medicine (Loutfy), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Nadia O'Brien
- Chronic Viral Illness Service (de Pokomandy, Bakombo, Proulx-Boucher), McGill University Health Centre; Department of Family Medicine (de Pokomandy, O'Brien), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Burchell), St. Michael's Hospital; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Burchell), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Health Sciences (Salters, Kaida), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; BC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS (Salters, Ding, Kaida), Vancouver, BC; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Boucoiran), Hôpital Sainte-Justine and Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Oak Tree Clinic (Pick), BC Women's Hospital; Department of Family Practice (Ogilvie), School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Women's College Research Institute (Loutfy), Women's College Hospital; Faculty of Medicine (Loutfy), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Dada Mamvula Bakombo
- Chronic Viral Illness Service (de Pokomandy, Bakombo, Proulx-Boucher), McGill University Health Centre; Department of Family Medicine (de Pokomandy, O'Brien), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Burchell), St. Michael's Hospital; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Burchell), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Health Sciences (Salters, Kaida), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; BC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS (Salters, Ding, Kaida), Vancouver, BC; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Boucoiran), Hôpital Sainte-Justine and Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Oak Tree Clinic (Pick), BC Women's Hospital; Department of Family Practice (Ogilvie), School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Women's College Research Institute (Loutfy), Women's College Hospital; Faculty of Medicine (Loutfy), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Karène Proulx-Boucher
- Chronic Viral Illness Service (de Pokomandy, Bakombo, Proulx-Boucher), McGill University Health Centre; Department of Family Medicine (de Pokomandy, O'Brien), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Burchell), St. Michael's Hospital; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Burchell), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Health Sciences (Salters, Kaida), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; BC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS (Salters, Ding, Kaida), Vancouver, BC; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Boucoiran), Hôpital Sainte-Justine and Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Oak Tree Clinic (Pick), BC Women's Hospital; Department of Family Practice (Ogilvie), School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Women's College Research Institute (Loutfy), Women's College Hospital; Faculty of Medicine (Loutfy), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Isabelle Boucoiran
- Chronic Viral Illness Service (de Pokomandy, Bakombo, Proulx-Boucher), McGill University Health Centre; Department of Family Medicine (de Pokomandy, O'Brien), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Burchell), St. Michael's Hospital; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Burchell), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Health Sciences (Salters, Kaida), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; BC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS (Salters, Ding, Kaida), Vancouver, BC; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Boucoiran), Hôpital Sainte-Justine and Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Oak Tree Clinic (Pick), BC Women's Hospital; Department of Family Practice (Ogilvie), School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Women's College Research Institute (Loutfy), Women's College Hospital; Faculty of Medicine (Loutfy), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Neora Pick
- Chronic Viral Illness Service (de Pokomandy, Bakombo, Proulx-Boucher), McGill University Health Centre; Department of Family Medicine (de Pokomandy, O'Brien), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Burchell), St. Michael's Hospital; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Burchell), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Health Sciences (Salters, Kaida), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; BC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS (Salters, Ding, Kaida), Vancouver, BC; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Boucoiran), Hôpital Sainte-Justine and Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Oak Tree Clinic (Pick), BC Women's Hospital; Department of Family Practice (Ogilvie), School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Women's College Research Institute (Loutfy), Women's College Hospital; Faculty of Medicine (Loutfy), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Gina Ogilvie
- Chronic Viral Illness Service (de Pokomandy, Bakombo, Proulx-Boucher), McGill University Health Centre; Department of Family Medicine (de Pokomandy, O'Brien), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Burchell), St. Michael's Hospital; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Burchell), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Health Sciences (Salters, Kaida), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; BC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS (Salters, Ding, Kaida), Vancouver, BC; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Boucoiran), Hôpital Sainte-Justine and Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Oak Tree Clinic (Pick), BC Women's Hospital; Department of Family Practice (Ogilvie), School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Women's College Research Institute (Loutfy), Women's College Hospital; Faculty of Medicine (Loutfy), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Mona Loutfy
- Chronic Viral Illness Service (de Pokomandy, Bakombo, Proulx-Boucher), McGill University Health Centre; Department of Family Medicine (de Pokomandy, O'Brien), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Burchell), St. Michael's Hospital; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Burchell), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Health Sciences (Salters, Kaida), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; BC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS (Salters, Ding, Kaida), Vancouver, BC; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Boucoiran), Hôpital Sainte-Justine and Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Oak Tree Clinic (Pick), BC Women's Hospital; Department of Family Practice (Ogilvie), School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Women's College Research Institute (Loutfy), Women's College Hospital; Faculty of Medicine (Loutfy), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Angela Kaida
- Chronic Viral Illness Service (de Pokomandy, Bakombo, Proulx-Boucher), McGill University Health Centre; Department of Family Medicine (de Pokomandy, O'Brien), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Burchell), St. Michael's Hospital; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Burchell), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Health Sciences (Salters, Kaida), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; BC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS (Salters, Ding, Kaida), Vancouver, BC; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Boucoiran), Hôpital Sainte-Justine and Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Oak Tree Clinic (Pick), BC Women's Hospital; Department of Family Practice (Ogilvie), School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Women's College Research Institute (Loutfy), Women's College Hospital; Faculty of Medicine (Loutfy), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| |
Collapse
|