Clinical characteristics and survival patterns of subsequent sarcoma, breast cancer, and melanoma after childhood cancer in the DCOG-LATER cohort

Melanoma Among Adult Survivors of Childhood Cancer: A Report From the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study

PURPOSE

Melanoma as a subsequent malignant neoplasm has been described among childhood cancer survivors; however, the risk factors and long-term survival are not well understood.

METHODS

We assessed incidence, risk factors, and outcomes for melanoma among participants in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study cohort. Cumulative incidence and standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated, and multivariable Cox models were used to determine hazard ratios (HRs) and associated 95% CI for melanoma risk factors. Radiation exposure to seven body regions and melanoma status for each of eight regions per survivor were integrated into the Cox model.

RESULTS

Among 25,716 participants, 177 melanomas developed in 160 survivors (110 invasive, 62 in situ cutaneous, five ocular). The 40-year melanoma cumulative incidence was 1.1% (95% CI, 0.9 to 1.4) for all participants and 1.5% (95% CI, 1.0 to 2.1) among those receiving a cumulative radiation dose of ≥40 Gy. Compared with the general population, the SIR for invasive skin or ocular melanoma was 2.0 (95% CI, 1.6 to 2.4). A cumulative radiation dose of ≥40 Gy to the corresponding body region(s) of the melanoma (HR, 2.0 [95% CI, 1.1 to 3.7]), a cumulative cyclophosphamide equivalent dose of ≥20,000 mg/m2 (HR, 1.9 [95% CI, 1.1 to 3.6]), and bleomycin exposure (HR, 2.2 [95% CI, 1.2 to 4.1]) were associated with increased cutaneous melanoma. Invasive melanoma at any site was associated with an increased risk of death (HR, 2.4 [95% CI, 1.7 to 3.3]).

CONCLUSION

Childhood cancer survivors have more than a two-fold increased risk of melanoma compared with the general population, and those with an invasive melanoma have more than a two-fold risk of death. High-dose radiation and alkylating agent exposure, and bleomycin are important risk factors for melanoma and should be considered in future patient guidance and screening.

Treatment, toxicity, and mortality after subsequent breast cancer in female survivors of childhood cancer

Childhood cancer survivors, particularly those who received chest radiotherapy, are at high risk for developing subsequent breast cancer. Minimizing long-term toxicity risks associated with additional radiotherapy and chemotherapy is a priority, but therapeutic tradeoffs have not been comprehensively characterized and their impact on survival is unknown. In this study, 431 female childhood cancer survivors with subsequent breast cancer from a multicenter retrospective cohort study were evaluated. Compared with one-to-one matched females with first primary breast cancer, survivors are as likely to be prescribed guideline-concordant treatment (N = 344 pairs; survivors: 94%, controls: 93%), but more frequently undergo mastectomy (survivors: 81%, controls: 60%) and are less likely to be treated with anthracyclines (survivors: 47%, controls: 66%) or radiotherapy (survivors: 18%, controls: 61%). Despite this, survivors have nearly 3.5-fold (95% CI = 2.17-5.57) greater mortality risk. Here, we show survivors with subsequent breast cancer face excess mortality despite therapeutic tradeoffs and require specialized treatment guidelines.

Treating secondary malignant neoplasms: A burden of childhood cancer survivors

Each year approximately 35,000 children and adolescents are diagnosed with cancer in Europe. Five-year survival rates have improved and now reach 80% in most European countries, thanks to a combination of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery. To date, there are more than 44,000 Italians still living several years after being diagnosed with cancer in developmental age. The risk of premature morbidity and mortality for cancer survivors is well known and documented. Approximately 60% of survivors of cancer in childhood and adolescence have at least one chronic health condition in later life, and more than one in four develop severe or life-threatening disorders. Among the various long-term iatrogenic sequelae of cancer treatments, the most worrisome are second malignant neoplasms. We reported on our mono-institutional experiences of screening and treating secondary breast cancer, secondary thyroid cancer and secondary osteosarcoma. Recommendations on the surveillance needed for cancer survivors because of the risk of late effects of their disease or its treatment suggest that discussing the potential problems early on can be crucial to a patient's future health. These considerations and our consolidated experience strengthen our conviction that survivors of cancer in childhood and adolescence who develop second malignant neoplasms should be treated at highly-specialized centers. Multidisciplinary care requires close communications and high levels of up-to-date professional expertise. This challenging area of health care is also changing rapidly because cancer survivorship is a work in progress, but we cannot wait for definitive conclusions on many aspects because this will take decades, especially for pediatric patients.

Trends in treatment of childhood cancer and subsequent primary neoplasm risk

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to investigate long-term risk and spectrum of subsequent neoplasm (SN) in childhood cancer survivors and to identify how trends in therapy influenced cumulative incidence of SN.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The population-based cohort comprises 3271 childhood cancer patients diagnosed in Slovenia aged ≤ 18 years between 1st January 1961 and 31st December 2013 with a follow-up through 31st December 2018. Main outcome measures are standardised incidence ratios (SIRs), absolute excess risks (AERs), and cumulative incidence of SN.

RESULTS

After median follow-up time of 21.5 years for 5-year survivors, 230 patients experienced 273 SN, including 183 subsequent malignant neoplasm (SMN), 34 meningiomas and 56 nonmelanoma skin cancers. 10.5% patients received radiotherapy only, 31% chemotherapy only, 26.9% a combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy and 16.1% surgery only. The overall SIR was almost 3 times more than expected (SIR 2.9), with survivors still at 2-fold increased risk after attained age 50 years. The observed cumulative incidence of SMN at 30-year after diagnosis was significantly lower for those diagnosed in 1960s, compared with the 1970s and the 1980s (P heterogeneity < 0.001). Despite reduced use of radiotherapy over time, the difference in cumulative incidence for the first 15 years after diagnosis was not significant for patients treated before or after 1995 (p = 0.11).

CONCLUSIONS

Risks of developing a SMN in this study are similar to other European population-based cohorts. The intensity of treatment peaked later and use of radiotherapy declined slower compared to high income countries, making continuous surveillance even more important in the future.

Secondary malignant neoplasms after bone and soft tissue sarcomas in children, adolescents, and young adults

BACKGROUND

Increased survival in young sarcoma patients comes along with a higher incidence of second malignant neoplasms (SMNs). The incidence, latency, histiotype, and outcome of these patients were analyzed because this information is essential to design evidence-based long-term follow-up care programs for young sarcoma survivors.

METHODS

Patients entered on clinical trials or registered in registries with a primary sarcoma in 1 of the cooperative sarcoma study groups in the framework of the Society for Pediatric Oncology and Hematology (GPOH) were screened for SMNs. Descriptive analysis, the Kaplan-Meier method, the Gray model, the Fine-Gray model, and the Cox regression model were used for the statistical analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 159 out of 7079 (2.2%) patients were registered with a SMN. Among them, 104 solid SMNs (65%) and 56 hematologic SMNs (35%) occurred. Median latency from first diagnosis of sarcoma to the diagnosis of SMN was 6.8 years (range, 0-26.7 years). Cumulative incidence of SMN was 8.8% after 30 years. Five-year-survival was 67.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 66.0-68.2) for the 7079 patients and it was 45.1% (95% CI, 36.2-53.6) after the diagnosis of a SMN (subcohort of n = 159 patients).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a remarkable high cumulative incidence of SMNs after bone and soft tissue sarcomas in children, adolescents, and young adults. Therefore, effective transition as well as risk adapted long-term follow-up care programs should be developed and offered to young sarcoma survivors.

LAY SUMMARY

Bone sarcomas and soft tissue tumors are rare tumors in children, adolescents, and young adults. The treatment varies, but may comprise chemotherapy, surgery, and/or radiotherapy. Developing a subsequent malignant tumor is a long-term risk for the patients. To better characterize this risk, we analyzed the data of 7079 patients (up to 21 years old) with bone sarcomas or soft tissue tumors. Our findings provide a basis to counsel young sarcoma survivors on their individual risk of subsequent malignant tumors. Moreover, these data can help to establish recommendations for aftercare in young sarcoma survivors.