Comparison of gated single-photon emission computed tomography with magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy

Analysis of Differences in Assessment of Left Ventricular Function on Echocardiography and Nuclear Perfusion Imaging

Two widely used methods for left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) determination, echocardiography (echo) and gated single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), often have wide limits of agreement. Factors influencing discrepancies between core laboratory echo and MPI LVEF determinations were examined in a large series of heart failure (HF) subjects and normal controls. 879 HF and 101 control subjects had core lab analyses of echo and MPI (mean time between procedures 7-8 days). LVEF differences were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and Bland-Altman plots. Relationships between LVEF differences and patient characteristics and outcome endpoints (mortality and arrhythmias) were explored with logistic regression, Cox proportional hazards models, and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses. There was a systematic difference between the 2 modalities; echo LVEF was higher with more severe LV dysfunction, MPI LVEF higher when systolic function was normal. LVEF results were within ±5% in only 37% of HF and 23% of control subjects. Considering discordance around the LVEF threshold 35%, there was disagreement between the 2 methods in 305 HF subjects (35%). Male gender (odds ratio (OR) = 0.200), atrial fibrillation (OR = 2.314), higher body mass index (OR = 1.051) and lower LV end-diastolic volume (OR = 0.985) were the strongest predictors of methodologic discordance. Cardiac event rates were highest if both LVEF values were ≤35% and lowest when both LVEF values were >35%. In conclusion, substantial disagreements between LVEF results by echo and MPI are common. HF patients with LVEF ≤35% by both techniques have the highest 2-year event risk.

Comparison of (99m)Tc-MIBI SPECT/18F-FDG PET imaging and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy: assessment of cardiac function and myocardial injury

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to evaluate the agreement between myocardial F-FDG PET imaging and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) in assessing cardiac function and relationship of cMRI late gadolinium enhancement (cMRI-LGE) and myocardial perfusion/metabolism pattern in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDCM).

METHODS

Forty-two consecutive patients diagnosed with IDCM were enrolled. All patients underwent Tc-MIBI SPECT, gated F-FDG PET imaging, and cMRI within 3-7 days. Cardiac function parameters were calculated using PET and cMRI. The segments analysis was performed using a 17-segment model. Patterns of perfusion/metabolism were classified as normal, mismatch, mild-to-moderate match, and severe match, and cMRI-LGE was classified into 3 categories (non-LGE, mid-wall LGE, and transmural LGE).

RESULTS

The correlation between gated PET and cMRI was excellent for end-diastolic volume (EDV; r = 0.948, P < 0.001), end-systolic volume (ESV; r = 0.939, P < 0.001), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF; r = 0.685, P < 0.001). EDV and ESV were underestimated, whereas LVEF was slightly overestimated by gated PET in comparison to cMRI. Perfusion/metabolism patterns varied in 3 different categories of non-LGE, mid-wall LGE, and transmural LGE (χ = 14.276, P < 0.001). Also, 71.0% (44/62) segments with mid-wall LGE had normal perfusion/metabolism patterns, and 75.9% (63/83) perfusion/metabolism mismatch segments were shown as non-LGE. The incidence of LGE was significantly higher in segments with severe match than the other 3 segment groups (χ = 112.53, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

There is an excellent agreement between gated PET and cMRI in assessment of cardiac function. LGE-cMRI is much more sensitive in detecting moderate fibrosis, while PET could detect more impaired but viable myocardium. Combining the 2 imaging modalities is useful for providing more comprehensive evaluations of myocardial injury in patients with IDCM.

The role of imaging in the management of cardiorenal syndrome

Imaging of the kidney and the heart can provide valuable information in the diagnosis and management of cardiorenal syndromes. Ultrasound- (US-) based imaging (echocardiogram and renal US) is an essential component in the initial diagnostic workup of CRS. Echocardiography provides information on the structure and function of heart, and renal ultrasound is useful in differentiating between acute and chronic kidney disease and excluding certain causes of acute kidney injury such as obstructive uropathy. In this paper we overview the basic concepts of echocardiogram and renal ultrasound and will discuss the clinical utility of these imaging techniques in the management of cardiorenal syndromes. We will also discuss the role of other imaging modalities currently in clinical use such as computerized tomography and magnetic resonance imaging as well as novel techniques such as contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging.