Long term effects of epoetin alfa in patients with ST- elevation myocardial infarction

Growth factor for therapeutic angiogenesis in ischemic heart disease: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Aim: This study was designed to systematically evaluate the effects of growth factor (GF) for therapeutic angiogenesis on ischemic heart disease (IHD) by pooling the results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods and Results: PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases were searched from inception to October 2022. RCTs, investigating the effects of GF therapy on IHD, were included. The risk bias of included study was assessed according to Cochrane tool. Weighted mean difference (WMD), calculated with fixed effect model or random effect model, was used to evaluate the effects of GF therapy on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) angina class. Relative risk (RR) was used to evaluate the effects of GF therapy on all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and revascularization. Meta-analysis, meta-regression analysis and publication bias analysis were performed by RevMan 5.3 or Stata 15.1 software. Twenty-nine studies involving 2899 IHD patients (1,577 patients in GF group and 1,322 patients in control group) were included. Compared with the control group, GF therapy did not reduce all-cause mortality (RR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.54-1.24; p = 0.341), MACE [(RR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.61-1.12; p = 0.227), revascularization (RR: 1.27, 95% CI: 0.82-1.96, p = 0.290) and CCS angina class (WMD: -0.08, 95% CI: -0.36 to 0.20, p = 0.560). However, GF therapy could increase LVEF during short-term follow-up (<1 year). Conclusion: GF for therapeutic angiogenesis was beneficial for increasing LVEF during short-term follow-up (<1 year), however, the therapy was not efficacious in decreasing all-cause mortality, MACE and revascularization.

Are There Any Cardioprotective Effects or Safety Concerns of Erythropoietin in Patients With Myocardial Infarction? A Systematic Review

Myocardial infarction (MI) is a global cause of morbidity and mortality. MI is the outcome of a chronic process termed atherosclerosis, a buildup of fatty and other substances called plaques inside the coronary vessels, causing hardening and thickening of the arterial wall. Erythropoietin (EPO) is a pleiotropic cytokine released mainly by the kidneys in adults. Besides its well-known erythropoietic functions, EPO possesses anti-apoptotic, mitogenic, and angiogenic effects. This review aims to analyze the strength of any therapeutic or protective value of EPO on the heart and safety concerns regarding its administration in MI individuals.

This systematic review was performed based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. Four databases (PubMed, PubMed Central, Google Scholar, and Sciences Direct) were employed to search for articles published in the last 10 years. Focused studies were relevant articles in the English language, trials, reviews, meta-analyses, and studies with a control group. Following the quality assessment process, nine studies were eligible and hence were included in the review consisting of six randomized controlled trials and three systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Contrary to preclinical studies, EPO administration did not significantly have notable effects on mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, or infarction size reduction. Significant left ventricle ejection fraction amelioration was not appreciated either. However, EPO seems to reduce the incidence of post-MI arrhythmias.

Erythropoietin, a multifaceted protein with innate and adaptive immune modulatory activity

Erythropoietin (EPO) is a glycoprotein produced mainly by the adult kidney in response to hypoxia and is the crucial regulator of red blood cell production. EPO receptors (EPORs), however, are not confined to erythroid cells, but are expressed by many organs including the heart, brain, retina, pancreas, and kidney, where they mediate EPO-induced, erythropoiesis-independent, tissue-protective effects. Some of these tissues also produce and locally release small amounts of EPO in response to organ injury as a mechanism of self-repair. Growing evidence shows that EPO possesses also important immune-modulating effects. Monocytes can produce EPO, and autocrine EPO/EPOR signaling in these cells is crucial in maintaining immunologic self-tolerance. New data in mice and humans also indicate that EPO has a direct inhibitory effect on effector/memory T cells, while it promotes formation of regulatory T cells. This review examines the nonerythropoietic effects of EPO, with a special emphasis on its modulating activity on innate immune cells and T cells and on how it affects transplant outcomes.

Efficacy of IntraCoronary Erythropoietin Delivery BEfore Reperfusion-Gauging Infarct Size in Patients with Acute ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (ICEBERG)

Previous clinical studies have shown inconsistent results regarding the effect of erythropoietin in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). This study investigated whether directed intracoronary infusion of darbepoetin-α into ischemic myocardium before reperfusion would reduce infarct size or post-infarct remodeling in STEMI patients.Eighty STEMI patients received one of the following treatments simultaneously with the first balloon inflation: intracoronary darbepoetin-α 300 μg (n = 40) or saline (n = 40), administered via the over-the-wire balloon system. The primary endpoint was infarct size estimated by serial cardiac enzyme levels after procedure. The secondary endpoints were (1) infarct size and proportion of salvaged myocardium measured with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) at baseline; (2) post-infarct remodeling (PIR), defined as an increase in left ventricular end-diastolic volume more than 20% at 4 months compared to the baseline on CMR; and (3) composite cardiovascular endpoints assessed at 4 months.The peak CK-MB [median 270.0 (interquartile range 139.8-356.3) versus 231.5 (131.0-408.5) ng/mL, P = 0.55] and troponin-I [128.5 (63.5-227.8) versus 109.0 (43.8-220.0) ng/mL, P = 0.52) ] did not differ between the darbepoetin-α and control group. Fifty-seven patients completed the baseline and 4-month follow-up CMR. There were no differences in infarct size [30.6 (18.1-49.8) versus 31.5 (22.5-47.3) cm³, P = 0.91), proportion of salvaged myocardium [26.7% (15.9-42.6%) versus 35.8% (22.4-48.8%), P = 0.12) or PIR (8.0% versus 6.7%, P = 0.62) between the two groups. Composite cardiovascular outcomes did not differ between the two groups.In conclusion, administration of intracoronary darbepoetin-α before reperfusion did not reduce infarct size or post-infarct remodeling in STEMI patients.

Harms of off-label erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for critically ill people

BACKGROUND

Anaemia is a common problem experienced by critically-ill people. Treatment with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) has been used as a pharmacologic strategy when the blunted response of endogenous erythropoietin has been reported in critically-ill people. The use of ESAs becomes more important where adverse clinical outcomes of transfusing blood products is a limitation. However, this indication for ESAs is not licensed by regulatory authorities and is called off-label use. Recent studies concern the harm of ESAs in a critical care setting.

OBJECTIVES

To focus on harms in assessing the effects of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), alone or in combination, compared with placebo, no treatment or a different active treatment regimen when administered off-label to critically-ill people.

SEARCH METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO via OvidSP, CINAHL, all evidence-based medicine (EBM) reviews including IPA and SCI-Expanded, Conference Proceedings Citation Index- Science, BIOSIS Previews and TOXLINE up to February 2017. We also searched trials registries, checked reference lists of relevant studies and tracked their citations by using SciVerse Scopus.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We considered randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled observational studies, which compared scheduled systemic administration of ESAs versus other effective interventions, placebo or no treatment in critically-ill people.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened and evaluated the eligibility of retrieved records, extracted data and assessed the risks of bias and quality of the included studies. We resolved differences in opinion by consensus or by involving a third review author. We assessed the evidence using GRADE and created a 'Summary of findings' table. We used fixed-effect or random-effects models, depending on the heterogeneity between studies. We fitted three-level hierarchical Bayesian models to calculate overall treatment effect estimates.

MAIN RESULTS

Of the 27,865 records identified, 39 clinical trials and 14 observational studies, including a total of 945,240 participants, were eligible for inclusion. Five studies are awaiting classification. Overall, we found 114 adverse events in 33 studies (30 RCTs and three observational studies), and mortality was reported in 41 studies (32 RCTs and nine observational studies). Most studies were at low to moderate risk of bias for harms outcomes. However, overall harm assessment and reporting were of moderate to low quality in the RCTs, and of low quality in the observational studies. We downgraded the GRADE quality of evidence for venous thromboembolism and mortality to very low and low, respectively, because of risk of bias, high inconsistency, imprecision and limitations of study design.It is unclear whether there is an increase in the risk of any adverse events (Bayesian risk ratio (RR) 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.93 to 1.21; 3099 participants; 9 studies; low-quality evidence) or venous thromboembolism (Bayesian RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.41; 18,917 participants; 18 studies; very low-quality evidence).There was a decreased risk of mortality with off-label use of ESAs in critically-ill people (Bayesian RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.92; 930,470 participants; 34 studies; low-quality evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Low quality of evidence suggests that off-label use of ESAs may reduce mortality in a critical care setting. There was a lack of high-quality evidence about the harm of ESAs in critically-ill people. The information for biosimilar ESAs is less conclusive. Most studies neither evaluated ESAs' harm as a primary outcome nor predefined adverse events. Any further studies of ESA should address the quality of evaluating, recording and reporting of adverse events.

Effect of Erythropoietin in patients with acute myocardial infarction: five-year results of the REVIVAL-3 trial

BACKGROUND

Erythropoietin (EPO) has been suggested to promote cardiac repair after MI. However, the randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled REVIVAL-3 trial showed that short term high dose EPO in timely reperfused myocardium does not improve left ventricular ejection fraction after 6 months. Moreover, the study raised safety concerns due to a trend towards a higher incidence of adverse clinical events as well as a increase in neointima formation after treatment with EPO. The present study therefore aimed to assess the 5-year clinical outcomes.

METHODS

After successful reperfusion 138 patients with STEMI were randomly assigned to receive epoetin beta (3.33×10⁴ U, n = 68) or placebo (n = 70) immediately, 24 and 48 h after percutaneous coronary intervention. The primary outcome of the present study- the combined incidence of MACE 5 years after randomization - occurred in 25% of the patients assigned to epoetin beta and 17% of the patients assigned to placebo (RR 1.5; 95% CI 0.8-3.5; p = 0.26). Target lesion revascularization was required in 15 patients (22.1%) treated with epoetin-ß and 9 patients (12.9%) treated with placebo (p = 0.15). Analysis of patients in the upper and lower quartile of baseline hemoglobin as an indirect estimate of endogenous erythropoietin levels revealed no significant impact of endogenous erythropoietin on efficiency of exogen administered epoetin-ß in terms of death and MACE.

CONCLUSION

These long-term follow-up data show that epoetin beta does not improve clinical outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier NCT00390832; trial registration date October 19th 2006.

Signaling Pathways in Cardiac Myocyte Apoptosis

Cardiovascular diseases, the number 1 cause of death worldwide, are frequently associated with apoptotic death of cardiac myocytes. Since cardiomyocyte apoptosis is a highly regulated process, pharmacological intervention of apoptosis pathways may represent a promising therapeutic strategy for a number of cardiovascular diseases and disorders including myocardial infarction, ischemia/reperfusion injury, chemotherapy cardiotoxicity, and end-stage heart failure. Despite rapid growth of our knowledge in apoptosis signaling pathways, a clinically applicable treatment targeting this cellular process is currently unavailable. To help identify potential innovative directions for future research, it is necessary to have a full understanding of the apoptotic pathways currently known to be functional in cardiac myocytes. Here, we summarize recent progress in the regulation of cardiomyocyte apoptosis by multiple signaling molecules and pathways, with a focus on the involvement of these pathways in the pathogenesis of heart disease. In addition, we provide an update regarding bench to bedside translation of this knowledge and discuss unanswered questions that need further investigation.

β-blocker Therapy is Not Associated with Reductions in Angina or Cardiovascular Events After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Insights from the IMAGINE Trial

Purpose

To evaluate whether β-blockers were associated with a reduction in cardiovascular events or angina after Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) surgery, in otherwise stable low-risk patients during a mid-term follow-up.

Methods

We performed a post-hoc analysis of the IMAGINE (Ischemia Management with Accupril post–bypass Graft via Inhibition of angiotensin coNverting Enzyme) trial, which tested the effect of Quinapril in 2553 hemodynamically stable patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >40 %, after scheduled CABG. The association between β-blocker therapy and the incidence of cardiovascular events (death, cardiac arrest, myocardial infarction, revascularizations, angina requiring hospitalization, stroke or hospitalization for heart failure) or angina that was documented to be due to underlying ischemia was tested with Cox regression and propensity adjusted analyses.

Results

In total, 1709 patients (76.5 %) were using a β-blocker. Patients had excellent control of risk factors; with mean systolic blood pressure being 121 ± 14 mmHg, mean LDL cholesterol of 2.8 mmol/l, 59 % of patients received statins and 92 % of patients received antiplatelet therapy. During a median follow-up of 33 months, β-blocker therapy was not associated with a reduction in cardiovascular events (hazard ratio 0.97; 95 % confidence interval 0.74–1.27), documented angina (hazard ratio 0.85; 95 % confidence interval 0.61–1.19) or any of the individual components of the combined endpoint. There were no relevant interactions for demographics, comorbidities or surgical characteristics. Propensity matched and time-dependent analyses revealed similar results.

Conclusions

β-blocker therapy after CABG is not associated with reductions in angina or cardiovascular events in low-risk patients with preserved LVEF, and may not be systematically indicated in such patients.

Administration of erythropoietin in patients with myocardial infarction: does it make sense? An updated and comprehensive meta-analysis and systematic review

This systematic review with meta-analysis sought to determine protective effects of erythropoietin on clinical outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Medline, Embase, Elsevier and Sciences online database as well as Google scholar literature were used for selecting appropriate studies with randomized controlled design. The effect sizes measured were odds ratio (OR) for categorical variables and weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence interval for calculating differences between mean values of duration of hospitalization in intervention and control groups. Values of P<0.1 for Q test or I(2)>50% indicated significant heterogeneity between the studies. The literature searches of all major databases retrieved 973 studies. After screening, a total of 15 trials that reported outcomes were identified. Pooled analysis was performed on left ventricular ejection fraction (WMD of -0.047; 95% CI: -0.912 to 0.819; P=0.9), left ventricular end diastolic volume (WMD of -0.363; 95% CI: -3.902 to 3.175; P=0.8), left ventricular end systolic volume (WMD of 0.346; 95% CI: -2.533 to 3.226; P=0.8), infarct size (WMD of -0.446; 95% CI: -2.352 to -1.460; P=0.6), stroke (OR of 2.1; 95% CI: 0.58 to 7.54; P=0.2), re-myocardial infarction (OR of 1.06; 95% CI: 0.52 to 2.185; P=0.8), heart failure (OR of 0.53; 95% CI: 0.259 to 1.105; P=0.09), mortality (OR of 0.56; 95% CI: 0.27 to 1.19; P=0.13), thrombosis (OR of 0.774; 95% CI: 0.41 to 1.45; P=0.4), major adverse cardiovascular events (OR of 0.926; 95% CI: 0.63 to 1.35; P=0.6). Short-term administration of EPO in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) undergoing PCI does not result in improvement in cardiac function, reduction of infarct size and all-cause mortality. Low dose EPO therapy may not be the choice of treatment for the patients with MI, while higher doses might be more effective.