1
|
Proskuryakova AA, Ivanova ES, Makunin AI, Larkin DM, Ferguson-Smith MA, Yang F, Uphyrkina OV, Perelman PL, Graphodatsky AS. Comparative studies of X chromosomes in Cervidae family. Sci Rep 2023; 13:11992. [PMID: 37491593 PMCID: PMC10368622 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-39088-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/27/2023] Open
Abstract
The family Cervidae is the second most diverse in the infraorder Pecora and is characterized by variability in the diploid chromosome numbers among species. X chromosomes in Cervidae evolved through complex chromosomal rearrangements of conserved segments within the chromosome, changes in centromere position, heterochromatic variation, and X-autosomal translocations. The family Cervidae consists of two subfamilies: Cervinae and Capreolinae. Here we build a detailed X chromosome map with 29 cattle bacterial artificial chromosomes of representatives of both subfamilies: reindeer (Rangifer tarandus), gray brocket deer (Mazama gouazoubira), Chinese water deer (Hydropotes inermis) (Capreolinae); black muntjac (Muntiacus crinifrons), tufted deer (Elaphodus cephalophus), sika deer (Cervus nippon) and red deer (Cervus elaphus) (Cervinae). To track chromosomal rearrangements during Cervidae evolution, we summarized new data, and compared them with available X chromosomal maps and chromosome level assemblies of other species. We demonstrate the types of rearrangements that may have underlined the variability of Cervidae X chromosomes. We detected two types of cervine X chromosome-acrocentric and submetacentric. The acrocentric type is found in three independent deer lineages (subfamily Cervinae and in two Capreolinae tribes-Odocoileini and Capreolini). We show that chromosomal rearrangements on the X-chromosome in Cervidae occur at a higher frequency than in the entire Ruminantia lineage: the rate of rearrangements is 2 per 10 million years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anastasia A Proskuryakova
- Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, SB RAS, Lavrentiev Ave 8/2, Novosibirsk, Russia, 630090.
| | - Ekaterina S Ivanova
- Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, SB RAS, Lavrentiev Ave 8/2, Novosibirsk, Russia, 630090
- Novosibirsk State University, Pirogova Str. 1, Novosibirsk, Russia, 630090
| | - Alexey I Makunin
- Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, SB RAS, Lavrentiev Ave 8/2, Novosibirsk, Russia, 630090
| | - Denis M Larkin
- The Royal Veterinary College, Royal College Street, University of London, London, NW1 0TU, UK
| | - Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith
- Department of Veterinary Medicine, Cambridge Resource Center for Comparative Genomics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Fengtang Yang
- School of Life Sciences and Medicine, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo, China
| | - Olga V Uphyrkina
- Federal Research Center for Biodiversity of the Terrestrial Biota of East Asia, Vladivostok, Russia
| | - Polina L Perelman
- Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, SB RAS, Lavrentiev Ave 8/2, Novosibirsk, Russia, 630090
| | - Alexander S Graphodatsky
- Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, SB RAS, Lavrentiev Ave 8/2, Novosibirsk, Russia, 630090
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kartavtseva IV, Sheremetyeva IN, Pavlenko MV. Intraspecies multiple chromosomal variations including rare tandem fusion in the Russian Far Eastern endemic evoron vole Alexandromysevoronensis (Rodentia, Arvicolinae). COMPARATIVE CYTOGENETICS 2021; 15:393-411. [PMID: 34900116 PMCID: PMC8629904 DOI: 10.3897/compcytogen.v15.i4.67112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 09/23/2021] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
The vole Alexandromysevoronensis (Kovalskaya et Sokolov, 1980) with its two chromosomal races, "Evoron" (2n = 38-41, NF = 54-59) and "Argi" (2n = 34, 36, 37, NF = 51-56) is the endemic vole found in the Russian Far East. For the "Argi" chromosomal race, individuals from two isolated populations in mountain regions were investigated here for the first time using GTG-, GTC-, NOR methods. In the area under study, 8 new karyotype variants have been registered. The karyotype with 2n = 34 has a rare tandem fusion of three autosomes: two biarmed (Mev6 and Mev7) and one acrocentric (Mev14) to form a large biarmed chromosome (Mev6/7/14), all of which reveal a heterozygous state. For A.evoronensis, the variation in the number of chromosomes exceeded the known estimate of 2n = 34, 36 and amounted to 2n = 34, 36, 38-41. The combination of all the variations of chromosomes for the species made it possible to describe 20 variants of the A.evoronensis karyotype, with 11 chromosomes being involved in multiple structural rearrangements. In the "Evoron" chromosomal race 4 chromosomes (Mev1, Mev4, Mev17, and Mev18) and in the "Argi" chromosomal race 9 chromosomes (Mev6, Mev7, Mev14, Mev13, Mev11, Mev15, Mev17, Mev18, and Mev19) were observed. Tandem and Robertsonian rearrangements (Mev17/18 and Mev17.18) were revealed in both chromosomal races "Evoron" and "Argi".
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irina V. Kartavtseva
- Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok 690022, Russia
| | - Irina N. Sheremetyeva
- Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok 690022, Russia
| | - Marina V. Pavlenko
- Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok 690022, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kartavtseva IV, Sheremetyeva IN, Pavlenko MV. Multiple Chromosomal Polymorphism of “Evoron” Chromosomal Race of the Evoron Vole (Rodentia, Arvicolinae). RUSS J GENET+ 2021. [DOI: 10.1134/s1022795421010087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
4
|
Karyotype Evolution in 10 Pinniped Species: Variability of Heterochromatin versus High Conservatism of Euchromatin as Revealed by Comparative Molecular Cytogenetics. Genes (Basel) 2020; 11:genes11121485. [PMID: 33321928 PMCID: PMC7763226 DOI: 10.3390/genes11121485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2020] [Revised: 12/04/2020] [Accepted: 12/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Pinnipedia karyotype evolution was studied here using human, domestic dog, and stone marten whole-chromosome painting probes to obtain comparative chromosome maps among species of Odobenidae (Odobenus rosmarus), Phocidae (Phoca vitulina, Phoca largha, Phoca hispida, Pusa sibirica, Erignathus barbatus), and Otariidae (Eumetopias jubatus, Callorhinus ursinus, Phocarctos hookeri, and Arctocephalus forsteri). Structural and functional chromosomal features were assessed with telomere repeat and ribosomal-DNA probes and by CBG (C-bands revealed by barium hydroxide treatment followed by Giemsa staining) and CDAG (Chromomycin A3-DAPI after G-banding) methods. We demonstrated diversity of heterochromatin among pinniped karyotypes in terms of localization, size, and nucleotide composition. For the first time, an intrachromosomal rearrangement common for Otariidae and Odobenidae was revealed. We postulate that the order of evolutionarily conserved segments in the analyzed pinnipeds is the same as the order proposed for the ancestral Carnivora karyotype (2n = 38). The evolution of conserved genomes of pinnipeds has been accompanied by few fusion events (less than one rearrangement per 10 million years) and by novel intrachromosomal changes including the emergence of new centromeres and pericentric inversion/centromere repositioning. The observed interspecific diversity of pinniped karyotypes driven by constitutive heterochromatin variation likely has played an important role in karyotype evolution of pinnipeds, thereby contributing to the differences of pinnipeds’ chromosome sets.
Collapse
|
5
|
Brookwell R, Finlayson K, van de Merwe JP. The Karyotype of Blainville's Beaked Whale, Mesoplodon densirostris. Cytogenet Genome Res 2020; 160:698-703. [PMID: 33207347 DOI: 10.1159/000511730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The karyotype of the Odontocete whale, Mesoplodon densirostris, has not been previously reported. The chromosome number is determined to be 2n = 42, and the karyotype is presented using G-, C-, and nucleolar organizer region (NOR) banding. The findings include NOR regions on 2 chromosomes, regions of heterochromatic variation, a large block of heterochromatin on the X chromosome, and a relatively large Y chromosome. The karyotype is compared to published karyograms of 2 other species of Mesoplodon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ross Brookwell
- Cytogenetics Department, Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Bowen Hills, Queensland, Australia,
| | - Kimberly Finlayson
- Australian Rivers Institute, Griffith University Gold Coast, Southport, Queensland, Australia
| | - Jason P van de Merwe
- Australian Rivers Institute, Griffith University Gold Coast, Southport, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zhang P, Zhao Y, Li C, Lin M, Dong L, Zhang R, Liu M, Li K, Zhang H, Liu X, Zhang Y, Yuan Y, Liu H, Seim I, Sun S, Du X, Chang Y, Li F, Liu S, Lee SMY, Wang K, Wang D, Wang X, McGowen MR, Jefferson TA, Olsen MT, Stiller J, Zhang G, Xu X, Yang H, Fan G, Liu X, Li S. An Indo-Pacific Humpback Dolphin Genome Reveals Insights into Chromosome Evolution and the Demography of a Vulnerable Species. iScience 2020; 23:101640. [PMID: 33103078 PMCID: PMC7569330 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2020] [Revised: 08/25/2020] [Accepted: 09/30/2020] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
The Indo-Pacific humpback dolphin (Sousa chinensis) is a small inshore species of odontocete cetacean listed as Vulnerable on the IUCN Red List. Here, we report on the evolution of S. chinensis chromosomes from its cetruminant ancestor and elucidate the evolutionary history and population genetics of two neighboring S. chinensis populations. We found that breakpoints in ancestral chromosomes leading to S. chinensis could have affected the function of genes related to kidney filtration, body development, and immunity. Resequencing of individuals from two neighboring populations in the northwestern South China Sea, Leizhou Bay and Sanniang Bay, revealed genetic differentiation, low diversity, and small contemporary effective population sizes. Demographic analyses showed a marked decrease in the population size of the two investigated populations over the last ~4,000 years, possibly related to climatic oscillations. This study implies a high risk of extinction and strong conservation requirement for the Indo-Pacific humpback dolphin. Deducing chromosome evolution from ancestral Cetruminantia and ancestral Odontoceti Reconstructing the demographic history of Sousa chinensis Implying high risk of extinction and strong conservation requirement for S. chinensis
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peijun Zhang
- Marine Mammal and Marine Bioacoustics Laboratory, Institute of Deep-sea Science and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Sanya, Hainan 572000, China
- Section for Ecology and Evolution, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen 2100, Denmark
| | - Yong Zhao
- BGI-Qingdao, BGI-Shenzhen, Qingdao, Shandong 266555, China
| | - Chang Li
- BGI-Qingdao, BGI-Shenzhen, Qingdao, Shandong 266555, China
- BGI Education Center, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518083, China
| | - Mingli Lin
- Marine Mammal and Marine Bioacoustics Laboratory, Institute of Deep-sea Science and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Sanya, Hainan 572000, China
| | - Lijun Dong
- Marine Mammal and Marine Bioacoustics Laboratory, Institute of Deep-sea Science and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Sanya, Hainan 572000, China
| | - Rui Zhang
- BGI-Qingdao, BGI-Shenzhen, Qingdao, Shandong 266555, China
| | - Mingzhong Liu
- Marine Mammal and Marine Bioacoustics Laboratory, Institute of Deep-sea Science and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Sanya, Hainan 572000, China
| | - Kuan Li
- Marine Mammal and Marine Bioacoustics Laboratory, Institute of Deep-sea Science and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Sanya, Hainan 572000, China
| | - He Zhang
- BGI-Qingdao, BGI-Shenzhen, Qingdao, Shandong 266555, China
- Department of Biology, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, China
| | - Xiaochuan Liu
- BGI-Qingdao, BGI-Shenzhen, Qingdao, Shandong 266555, China
| | - Yaolei Zhang
- BGI-Qingdao, BGI-Shenzhen, Qingdao, Shandong 266555, China
- Department of Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby 2800, Denmark
| | - Yuan Yuan
- Marine Mammal and Marine Bioacoustics Laboratory, Institute of Deep-sea Science and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Sanya, Hainan 572000, China
- Center for Ecological and Environmental Sciences, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710072, China
| | - Huan Liu
- BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518083, China
| | - Inge Seim
- Integrative Biology Laboratory, College of Life Sciences, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210023, China
- Comparative and Endocrine Biology Laboratory, Translational Research Institute-Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, School of Biomedical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane 4102, Australia
| | - Shuai Sun
- BGI-Qingdao, BGI-Shenzhen, Qingdao, Shandong 266555, China
| | - Xiao Du
- BGI-Qingdao, BGI-Shenzhen, Qingdao, Shandong 266555, China
| | - Yue Chang
- BGI-Qingdao, BGI-Shenzhen, Qingdao, Shandong 266555, China
| | - Feida Li
- BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518083, China
| | - Shanshan Liu
- BGI-Qingdao, BGI-Shenzhen, Qingdao, Shandong 266555, China
| | - Simon Ming-Yuen Lee
- State Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Medical Sciences, University of Macau, Macao 999078, China
| | - Kun Wang
- Center for Ecological and Environmental Sciences, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710072, China
| | - Ding Wang
- Key Laboratory of Aquatic Biodiversity and Conservation of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China
| | - Xianyan Wang
- Third Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Xiamen, Fujian 361005, China
| | - Michael R. McGowen
- Department of Vertebrate Zoology, Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, Washington DC 20560, USA
| | | | - Morten Tange Olsen
- Evolutionary Genomics Section, Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, Copenhagen 1353, Denmark
| | - Josefin Stiller
- Section for Ecology and Evolution, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen 2100, Denmark
| | - Guojie Zhang
- Section for Ecology and Evolution, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen 2100, Denmark
- China National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518120, China
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan 650223, China
| | - Xun Xu
- BGI-Qingdao, BGI-Shenzhen, Qingdao, Shandong 266555, China
- BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518083, China
| | - Huanming Yang
- BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518083, China
- China National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518120, China
| | - Guangyi Fan
- BGI-Qingdao, BGI-Shenzhen, Qingdao, Shandong 266555, China
- State Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Medical Sciences, University of Macau, Macao 999078, China
- Corresponding author
| | - Xin Liu
- BGI-Qingdao, BGI-Shenzhen, Qingdao, Shandong 266555, China
- BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518083, China
- BGI-Fuyang, BGI-Shenzhen, Fuyang, Anhui 236009, China
- State Key Laboratory of Agricultural Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, Guandong 518083, China
- Corresponding author
| | - Songhai Li
- Marine Mammal and Marine Bioacoustics Laboratory, Institute of Deep-sea Science and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Sanya, Hainan 572000, China
- Function Laboratory for Marine Fisheries Science and Food Production Processes, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Qingdao, Shandong 266237, China
- Tropical Marine Science Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119227, Singapore
- Corresponding author
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Evolution of the Human Chromosome 13 Synteny: Evolutionary Rearrangements, Plasticity, Human Disease Genes and Cancer Breakpoints. Genes (Basel) 2020; 11:genes11040383. [PMID: 32244767 PMCID: PMC7230465 DOI: 10.3390/genes11040383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2020] [Revised: 03/27/2020] [Accepted: 03/27/2020] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
The history of each human chromosome can be studied through comparative cytogenetic approaches in mammals which permit the identification of human chromosomal homologies and rearrangements between species. Comparative banding, chromosome painting, Bacterial Artificial Chromosome (BAC) mapping and genome data permit researchers to formulate hypotheses about ancestral chromosome forms. Human chromosome 13 has been previously shown to be conserved as a single syntenic element in the Ancestral Primate Karyotype; in this context, in order to study and verify the conservation of primate chromosomes homologous to human chromosome 13, we mapped a selected set of BAC probes in three platyrrhine species, characterised by a high level of rearrangements, using fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH). Our mapping data on Saguinus oedipus, Callithrix argentata and Alouatta belzebul provide insight into synteny of human chromosome 13 evolution in a comparative perspective among primate species, showing rearrangements across taxa. Furthermore, in a wider perspective, we have revised previous cytogenomic literature data on chromosome 13 evolution in eutherian mammals, showing a complex origin of the eutherian mammal ancestral karyotype which has still not been completely clarified. Moreover, we analysed biomedical aspects (the OMIM and Mitelman databases) regarding human chromosome 13, showing that this autosome is characterised by a certain level of plasticity that has been implicated in many human cancers and diseases.
Collapse
|
8
|
Comparative Chromosome Mapping of Musk Ox and the X Chromosome among Some Bovidae Species. Genes (Basel) 2019; 10:genes10110857. [PMID: 31671864 PMCID: PMC6896007 DOI: 10.3390/genes10110857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2019] [Revised: 10/16/2019] [Accepted: 10/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
: Bovidae, the largest family in Pecora infraorder, are characterized by a striking variability in diploid number of chromosomes between species and among individuals within a species. The bovid X chromosome is also remarkably variable, with several morphological types in the family. Here we built a detailed chromosome map of musk ox (Ovibos moschatus), a relic species originating from Pleistocene megafauna, with dromedary and human probes using chromosome painting. We trace chromosomal rearrangements during Bovidae evolution by comparing species already studied by chromosome painting. The musk ox karyotype differs from the ancestral pecoran karyotype by six fusions, one fission, and three inversions. We discuss changes in pecoran ancestral karyotype in the light of new painting data. Variations in the X chromosome structure of four bovid species nilgai bull (Boselaphus tragocamelus), saola (Pseudoryx nghetinhensis), gaur (Bos gaurus), and Kirk's Dikdik (Madoqua kirkii) were further analyzed using 26 cattle BAC-clones. We found the duplication on the X in saola. We show main rearrangements leading to the formation of four types of bovid X: Bovinae type with derived cattle subtype formed by centromere reposition and Antilopinae type with Caprini subtype formed by inversion in XSB3.
Collapse
|
9
|
Farré M, Kim J, Proskuryakova AA, Zhang Y, Kulemzina AI, Li Q, Zhou Y, Xiong Y, Johnson JL, Perelman PL, Johnson WE, Warren WC, Kukekova AV, Zhang G, O'Brien SJ, Ryder OA, Graphodatsky AS, Ma J, Lewin HA, Larkin DM. Evolution of gene regulation in ruminants differs between evolutionary breakpoint regions and homologous synteny blocks. Genome Res 2019; 29:576-589. [PMID: 30760546 PMCID: PMC6442394 DOI: 10.1101/gr.239863.118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2018] [Accepted: 02/08/2019] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
The role of chromosome rearrangements in driving evolution has been a long-standing question of evolutionary biology. Here we focused on ruminants as a model to assess how rearrangements may have contributed to the evolution of gene regulation. Using reconstructed ancestral karyotypes of Cetartiodactyls, Ruminants, Pecorans, and Bovids, we traced patterns of gross chromosome changes. We found that the lineage leading to the ruminant ancestor after the split from other cetartiodactyls was characterized by mostly intrachromosomal changes, whereas the lineage leading to the pecoran ancestor (including all livestock ruminants) included multiple interchromosomal changes. We observed that the liver cell putative enhancers in the ruminant evolutionary breakpoint regions are highly enriched for DNA sequences under selective constraint acting on lineage-specific transposable elements (TEs) and a set of 25 specific transcription factor (TF) binding motifs associated with recently active TEs. Coupled with gene expression data, we found that genes near ruminant breakpoint regions exhibit more divergent expression profiles among species, particularly in cattle, which is consistent with the phylogenetic origin of these breakpoint regions. This divergence was significantly greater in genes with enhancers that contain at least one of the 25 specific TF binding motifs and located near bovidae-to-cattle lineage breakpoint regions. Taken together, by combining ancestral karyotype reconstructions with analysis of cis regulatory element and gene expression evolution, our work demonstrated that lineage-specific regulatory elements colocalized with gross chromosome rearrangements may have provided valuable functional modifications that helped to shape ruminant evolution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Farré
- Royal Veterinary College, University of London, London NW1 0TU, United Kingdom
| | - Jaebum Kim
- Department of Biomedical Science and Engineering, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea
| | - Anastasia A Proskuryakova
- Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, SB RAS, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.,Synthetic Biology Unit, Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
| | - Yang Zhang
- Computational Biology Department, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA
| | | | - Qiye Li
- China National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China
| | - Yang Zhou
- China National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China
| | - Yingqi Xiong
- China National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China
| | - Jennifer L Johnson
- Department of Animal Sciences, College of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA
| | - Polina L Perelman
- Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, SB RAS, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.,Synthetic Biology Unit, Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
| | - Warren E Johnson
- Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological Park, Front Royal, Virginia 22630, USA.,Walter Reed Biosystematics Unit, Museum Support Center, Smithsonian Institution, Suitland, Maryland 20746, USA
| | - Wesley C Warren
- Bond Life Sciences Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 63201, USA
| | - Anna V Kukekova
- Department of Animal Sciences, College of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA
| | - Guojie Zhang
- China National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China.,State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650223, China.,Centre for Social Evolution, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Stephen J O'Brien
- Theodosius Dobzhansky Center for Genome Bioinformatics, St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg 199004, Russia.,Guy Harvey Oceanographic Center, Halmos College of Natural Sciences and Oceanography, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33004, USA
| | - Oliver A Ryder
- Institute for Conservation Research, San Diego Zoo, Escondido, California 92027, USA
| | - Alexander S Graphodatsky
- Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, SB RAS, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.,Synthetic Biology Unit, Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
| | - Jian Ma
- Computational Biology Department, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA
| | - Harris A Lewin
- Department of Evolution and Ecology and the UC Davis Genome Center, University of California, Davis, California 95616, USA
| | - Denis M Larkin
- Royal Veterinary College, University of London, London NW1 0TU, United Kingdom.,The Federal Research Center Institute of Cytology and Genetics, The Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (ICG SB RAS), Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Autenrieth M, Hartmann S, Lah L, Roos A, Dennis AB, Tiedemann R. High-quality whole-genome sequence of an abundant Holarctic odontocete, the harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena). Mol Ecol Resour 2018; 18:1469-1481. [PMID: 30035363 DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.12932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2017] [Revised: 07/04/2018] [Accepted: 07/05/2018] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
The harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) is a highly mobile cetacean found across the Northern hemisphere. It occurs in coastal waters and inhabits basins that vary broadly in salinity, temperature and food availability. These diverse habitats could drive subtle differentiation among populations, but examination of this would be best conducted with a robust reference genome. Here, we report the first harbour porpoise genome, assembled de novo from an individual originating in the Kattegat Sea (Sweden). The genome is one of the most complete cetacean genomes currently available, with a total size of 2.39 Gb and 50% of the total length found in just 34 scaffolds. Using 122 of the longest scaffolds, we were able to show high levels of synteny with the genome of the domestic cattle (Bos taurus). Our draft annotation comprises 22,154 predicted genes, which we further annotated through matches to the NCBI nucleotide database, GO categorization and motif prediction. Within the predicted genes, we have confirmed the presence of >20 genes or gene families that have been associated with adaptive evolution in other cetaceans. Overall, this genome assembly and draft annotation represent a crucial addition to the genomic resources currently available for the study of porpoises and Phocoenidae evolution, phylogeny and conservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marijke Autenrieth
- Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, Evolutionary Biology/Systematic Zoology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
| | - Stefanie Hartmann
- Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, Evolutionary Adaptive Genomics, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
| | - Ljerka Lah
- Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, Evolutionary Biology/Systematic Zoology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
| | - Anna Roos
- Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Alice B Dennis
- Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, Evolutionary Biology/Systematic Zoology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
| | - Ralph Tiedemann
- Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, Evolutionary Biology/Systematic Zoology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Karyotype relationships among selected deer species and cattle revealed by bovine FISH probes. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0187559. [PMID: 29112970 PMCID: PMC5675437 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2017] [Accepted: 10/21/2017] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The Cervidae family comprises more than fifty species divided into three subfamilies: Capreolinae, Cervinae and Hydropotinae. A characteristic attribute for the species included in this family is the great karyotype diversity, with the chromosomal numbers ranging from 2n = 6 observed in female Muntiacus muntjak vaginalis to 2n = 70 found in Mazama gouazoubira as a result of numerous Robertsonian and tandem fusions. This work reports chromosomal homologies between cattle (Bos taurus, 2n = 60) and nine cervid species using a combination of whole chromosome and region-specific paints and BAC clones derived from cattle. We show that despite the great diversity of karyotypes in the studied species, the number of conserved chromosomal segments detected by 29 cattle whole chromosome painting probes was 35 for all Cervidae samples. The detailed analysis of the X chromosomes revealed two different morphological types within Cervidae. The first one, present in the Capreolinae is a sub/metacentric X with the structure more similar to the bovine X. The second type found in Cervini and Muntiacini is an acrocentric X which shows rearrangements in the proximal part that have not yet been identified within Ruminantia. Moreover, we characterised four repetitive sequences organized in heterochromatic blocks on sex chromosomes of the reindeer (Rangifer tarandus). We show that these repeats gave no hybridization signals to the chromosomes of the closely related moose (Alces alces) and are therefore specific to the reindeer.
Collapse
|
12
|
Proskuryakova AA, Kulemzina AI, Perelman PL, Makunin AI, Larkin DM, Farré M, Kukekova AV, Lynn Johnson J, Lemskaya NA, Beklemisheva VR, Roelke-Parker ME, Bellizzi J, Ryder OA, O'Brien SJ, Graphodatsky AS. X Chromosome Evolution in Cetartiodactyla. Genes (Basel) 2017; 8:genes8090216. [PMID: 28858207 PMCID: PMC5615350 DOI: 10.3390/genes8090216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2017] [Revised: 08/24/2017] [Accepted: 08/25/2017] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The phenomenon of a remarkable conservation of the X chromosome in eutherian mammals has been first described by Susumu Ohno in 1964. A notable exception is the cetartiodactyl X chromosome, which varies widely in morphology and G-banding pattern between species. It is hypothesized that this sex chromosome has undergone multiple rearrangements that changed the centromere position and the order of syntenic segments over the last 80 million years of Cetartiodactyla speciation. To investigate its evolution we have selected 26 evolutionarily conserved bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clones from the cattle CHORI-240 library evenly distributed along the cattle X chromosome. High-resolution BAC maps of the X chromosome on a representative range of cetartiodactyl species from different branches: pig (Suidae), alpaca (Camelidae), gray whale (Cetacea), hippopotamus (Hippopotamidae), Java mouse-deer (Tragulidae), pronghorn (Antilocapridae), Siberian musk deer (Moschidae), and giraffe (Giraffidae) were obtained by fluorescent in situ hybridization. To trace the X chromosome evolution during fast radiation in specious families, we performed mapping in several cervids (moose, Siberian roe deer, fallow deer, and Pere David's deer) and bovid (muskox, goat, sheep, sable antelope, and cattle) species. We have identified three major conserved synteny blocks and rearrangements in different cetartiodactyl lineages and found that the recently described phenomenon of the evolutionary new centromere emergence has taken place in the X chromosome evolution of Cetartiodactyla at least five times. We propose the structure of the putative ancestral cetartiodactyl X chromosome by reconstructing the order of syntenic segments and centromere position for key groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anastasia A Proskuryakova
- Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, SB RAS, Lavrentiev Ave. 8/2, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.
- Synthetic Biology Unit, Novosibirsk State University, Pirogova Str. 1, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.
| | - Anastasia I Kulemzina
- Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, SB RAS, Lavrentiev Ave. 8/2, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.
| | - Polina L Perelman
- Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, SB RAS, Lavrentiev Ave. 8/2, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.
- Synthetic Biology Unit, Novosibirsk State University, Pirogova Str. 1, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.
| | - Alexey I Makunin
- Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, SB RAS, Lavrentiev Ave. 8/2, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.
| | - Denis M Larkin
- The Royal Veterinary College, University of London, Royal College Street, London NW1 0TU, UK.
| | - Marta Farré
- The Royal Veterinary College, University of London, Royal College Street, London NW1 0TU, UK.
| | - Anna V Kukekova
- Animal Sciences Department, College of ACES, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL 61801, USA.
| | - Jennifer Lynn Johnson
- Animal Sciences Department, College of ACES, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL 61801, USA.
| | - Natalya A Lemskaya
- Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, SB RAS, Lavrentiev Ave. 8/2, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.
| | - Violetta R Beklemisheva
- Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, SB RAS, Lavrentiev Ave. 8/2, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.
| | - Melody E Roelke-Parker
- Frederick National Laboratory of Cancer Research, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick, MD 21702, USA.
| | - June Bellizzi
- Catoctin Zoo and Wildlife Preserve, Thurmont, MD 21788, USA.
| | - Oliver A Ryder
- San Diego Zoo Institute for Conservation Research, 15600 San Pasqual Valley Road, Escondido, CA 92027, USA.
| | - Stephen J O'Brien
- Theodosius Dobzhansky Center for Genome Bioinformatics, Saint-Petersburg State University, Sredniy Av. 41A, Saint-Petersburg 199034, Russia.
- Oceanographic Center, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale 3301 College Ave, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33314, USA.
| | - Alexander S Graphodatsky
- Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, SB RAS, Lavrentiev Ave. 8/2, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.
- Synthetic Biology Unit, Novosibirsk State University, Pirogova Str. 1, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
A Comparative Study of Pygmy Hippopotamus (Choeropsis liberiensis) Karyotype by Cross-Species Chromosome Painting. J MAMM EVOL 2016. [DOI: 10.1007/s10914-016-9358-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
14
|
Kulemzina AI, Proskuryakova AA, Beklemisheva VR, Lemskaya NA, Perelman PL, Graphodatsky AS. Comparative Chromosome Map and Heterochromatin Features of the Gray Whale Karyotype (Cetacea). Cytogenet Genome Res 2016; 148:25-34. [PMID: 27088853 DOI: 10.1159/000445459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/17/2016] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Cetacean karyotypes possess exceptionally stable diploid numbers and highly conserved chromosomes. To date, only toothed whales (Odontoceti) have been analyzed by comparative chromosome painting. Here, we studied the karyotype of a representative of baleen whales, the gray whale (Eschrichtius robustus, Mysticeti), by Zoo-FISH with dromedary camel and human chromosome-specific probes. We confirmed a high degree of karyotype conservation and found an identical order of syntenic segments in both branches of cetaceans. Yet, whale chromosomes harbor variable heterochromatic regions constituting up to a third of the genome due to the presence of several types of repeats. To investigate the cause of this variability, several classes of repeated DNA sequences were mapped onto chromosomes of whale species from both Mysticeti and Odontoceti. We uncovered extensive intrapopulation variability in the size of heterochromatic blocks present in homologous chromosomes among 3 individuals of the gray whale by 2-step differential chromosome staining. We show that some of the heteromorphisms observed in the gray whale karyotype are due to distinct amplification of a complex of common cetacean repeat and heavy satellite repeat on homologous autosomes. Furthermore, we demonstrate localization of the telomeric repeat in the heterochromatin of both gray and pilot whale (Globicephala melas, Odontoceti). Heterochromatic blocks in the pilot whale represent a composite of telomeric and common repeats, while heavy satellite repeat is lacking in the toothed whale consistent with previous studies.
Collapse
|
15
|
Beklemisheva VR, Perelman PL, Lemskaya NA, Kulemzina AI, Proskuryakova AA, Burkanov VN, Graphodatsky AS. The Ancestral Carnivore Karyotype As Substantiated by Comparative Chromosome Painting of Three Pinnipeds, the Walrus, the Steller Sea Lion and the Baikal Seal (Pinnipedia, Carnivora). PLoS One 2016; 11:e0147647. [PMID: 26821159 PMCID: PMC4731086 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2015] [Accepted: 01/06/2016] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Karyotype evolution in Carnivora is thoroughly studied by classical and molecular cytogenetics and supplemented by reconstructions of Ancestral Carnivora Karyotype (ACK). However chromosome painting information from two pinniped families (Odobenidae and Otariidae) is noticeably missing. We report on the construction of the comparative chromosome map for species from each of the three pinniped families: the walrus (Odobenus rosmarus, Odobenidae–monotypic family), near threatened Steller sea lion (Eumetopias jubatus, Otariidae) and the endemic Baikal seal (Pusa sibirica, Phocidae) using combination of human, domestic dog and stone marten whole-chromosome painting probes. The earliest karyological studies of Pinnipedia showed that pinnipeds were characterized by a pronounced karyological conservatism that is confirmed here with species from Phocidae, Otariidae and Odobenidae sharing same low number of conserved human autosomal segments (32). Chromosome painting in Pinnipedia and comparison with non-pinniped carnivore karyotypes provide strong support for refined structure of ACK with 2n = 38. Constructed comparative chromosome maps show that pinniped karyotype evolution was characterized by few tandem fusions, seemingly absent inversions and slow rate of genome rearrangements (less then one rearrangement per 10 million years). Integrative comparative analyses with published chromosome painting of Phoca vitulina revealed common cytogenetic signature for Phoca/Pusa branch and supports Phocidae and Otaroidea (Otariidae/Odobenidae) as sister groups. We revealed rearrangements specific for walrus karyotype and found the chromosomal signature linking together families Otariidae and Odobenidae. The Steller sea lion karyotype is the most conserved among three studied species and differs from the ACK by single fusion. The study underlined the strikingly slow karyotype evolution of the Pinnipedia in general and the Otariidae in particular.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Violetta R. Beklemisheva
- Department of Comparative Genomics, Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia
- * E-mail:
| | - Polina L. Perelman
- Department of Comparative Genomics, Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia
- Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, Russia
| | - Natalya A. Lemskaya
- Department of Comparative Genomics, Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia
| | - Anastasia I. Kulemzina
- Department of Comparative Genomics, Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia
| | - Anastasia A. Proskuryakova
- Department of Comparative Genomics, Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia
- Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, Russia
| | - Vladimir N. Burkanov
- Department of Higher Vertebrates Ecology, Kamchatka Branch of Pacific Geographical Institute of Far East Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Petropavlovsk-Kamchatski, Russia
- National Marine Mammal Laboratory, Alaska Fisheries Science Centre, National Marine Fisheries Service, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Alexander S. Graphodatsky
- Department of Comparative Genomics, Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia
- Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Dobigny G, Britton-Davidian J, Robinson TJ. Chromosomal polymorphism in mammals: an evolutionary perspective. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 2015; 92:1-21. [PMID: 26234165 DOI: 10.1111/brv.12213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2014] [Revised: 06/23/2015] [Accepted: 07/09/2015] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Although chromosome rearrangements (CRs) are central to studies of genome evolution, our understanding of the evolutionary consequences of the early stages of karyotypic differentiation (i.e. polymorphism), especially the non-meiotic impacts, is surprisingly limited. We review the available data on chromosomal polymorphisms in mammals so as to identify taxa that hold promise for developing a more comprehensive understanding of chromosomal change. In doing so, we address several key questions: (i) to what extent are mammalian karyotypes polymorphic, and what types of rearrangements are principally involved? (ii) Are some mammalian lineages more prone to chromosomal polymorphism than others? More specifically, do (karyotypically) polymorphic mammalian species belong to lineages that are also characterized by past, extensive karyotype repatterning? (iii) How long can chromosomal polymorphisms persist in mammals? We discuss the evolutionary implications of these questions and propose several research avenues that may shed light on the role of chromosome change in the diversification of mammalian populations and species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gauthier Dobigny
- Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Centre de Biologie pour la Gestion des Populations (UMR IRD-INRA-Cirad-Montpellier SupAgro), Campus International de Baillarguet, CS30016, 34988, Montferrier-sur-Lez, France
| | - Janice Britton-Davidian
- Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, EPHE, Cc065, Place Eugène Bataillon, 34095, Montpellier Cedex 5, France
| | - Terence J Robinson
- Evolutionary Genomics Group, Department of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland, Stellenbosch, 7062, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Avila F, Baily MP, Merriwether DA, Trifonov VA, Rubes J, Kutzler MA, Chowdhary R, Janečka J, Raudsepp T. A cytogenetic and comparative map of camelid chromosome 36 and the minute in alpacas. Chromosome Res 2015; 23:237-51. [PMID: 25634498 DOI: 10.1007/s10577-014-9463-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2014] [Revised: 12/03/2014] [Accepted: 12/18/2014] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Recent advances in camelid genomics have provided draft sequence assemblies and the first comparative and gene maps for the dromedary (CDR) and the alpaca (LPA). However, no map information is currently available for the smallest camelid autosome-chr36. The chromosome is also of clinical interest because of its involvement in the minute chromosome syndrome (MCS) in infertile alpacas. Here, we developed molecular markers for camelid chr36 by direct sequencing CDR36 and LPA minute and by bioinformatics analysis of alpaca unplaced sequence scaffolds. We constructed a cytogenetic map for chr36 in the alpaca, llama, and dromedary and showed its homology to human chromosome 7 (HSA7) at 49.8-55.5 Mb. The chr36 map comprised seven markers, including two genes-ZPBP and WVC2. Comparative status of HSA7 was further refined by cytogenetic mapping of 16 HSA7 orthologs in camelid chromosomes 7 and 18 and by the analysis of HSA7-conserved synteny blocks across 11 vertebrate species. Finally, mapping chr36 markers in infertile alpacas confirmed that the minute chromosome was a derivative of chr36, but the small size was not a result of a large deletion or a translocation. Instead, cytogenetic mapping of 5.8S, 18S, and 28S rRNA genes (nucleolus organizer region (NOR)) revealed that the size difference between chr36 homologs in infertile alpacas was due to a heterozygous presence of NOR, whereas chr36 in fertile alpacas had no NOR. We theorized that the heterozygous NOR might affect chr36 pairing, recombination, and segregation in meiosis and, thus fertility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felipe Avila
- Department of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-4458, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kulemzina AI, Perelman PL, Grafodatskaya DA, Nguyen TT, Thompson M, Roelke-Parker ME, Graphodatsky AS. Comparative chromosome painting of pronghorn (Antilocapra americana) and saola (Pseudoryx nghetinhensis) karyotypes with human and dromedary camel probes. BMC Genet 2014; 15:68. [PMID: 24923361 PMCID: PMC4061535 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2156-15-68] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2014] [Accepted: 06/09/2014] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pronghorn (Antilocapridae, 2n = 58) and saola (Bovidae, 2n = 50) are members of Pecora, a highly diversified group of even-toed hoofed mammals. Karyotypes of these species were not involved in chromosome painting studies despite their intriguing phylogenetic positions in Pecora. RESULTS To trace the chromosome evolution during very fast radiation of main families from the common Pecoran ancestor, high-resolution comparative chromosome maps of pronghorn and saola with human (HSA) and dromedary camel (CDR) painting probes were established. The human and dromedary camel painting probes revealed 50 and 64 conserved segments respectively in the pronghorn genome, while 51 and 63 conserved segments respectively in the saola genome. Integrative analysis with published comparative maps showed that inversions in chromosomes homologous to CDR19/35/19 (HSA 10/20/10), CDR12/34/12 (HSA12/22/12/22), CDR10/33/10 (HSA 11) are present in representatives of all five living Pecoran families. The pronghorn karyotype could have formed from a putative 2n = 58 Pecoran ancestral karyotype by one fission and one fusion and that the saola karyotype differs from the presumed 2n = 60 bovid ancestral karyotype (2n = 60) by five fusions. CONCLUSION The establishment of high-resolution comparative maps for pronghorn and saola has shed some new insights into the putative ancestral karyotype, chromosomal evolution and phylogenic relationships in Pecora. No cytogenetic signature rearrangements were found that could unite the Antilocapridae with Giraffidae or with any other Pecoran families. Our data on the saola support a separate position of Pseudorigyna subtribe rather than its affinity to either Bovina or Bubalina, but the saola phylogenetic position within Bovidae remains unresolved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anastasia I Kulemzina
- Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, SB RAS and Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, Russia.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Arslan A, Zima J. Karyotypes of the mammals of Turkey and neighbouring regions: a review. FOLIA ZOOLOGICA 2014. [DOI: 10.25225/fozo.v63.i1.a1.2014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Atilla Arslan
- Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Selçuk University, 42031 Konya, Turkey
| | - Jan Zima
- Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, v.v.i., Květná 8, 603 65 Brno, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Cernohorska H, Kubickova S, Kopecna O, Kulemzina AI, Perelman PL, Elder FFB, Robinson TJ, Graphodatsky AS, Rubes J. Molecular cytogenetic insights to the phylogenetic affinities of the giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis) and pronghorn (Antilocapra americana). Chromosome Res 2013; 21:447-60. [PMID: 23896647 DOI: 10.1007/s10577-013-9361-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2013] [Revised: 04/27/2013] [Accepted: 04/27/2013] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Five families are traditionally recognized within higher ruminants (Pecora): Bovidae, Moschidae, Cervidae, Giraffidae and Antilocapridae. The phylogenetic relationships of Antilocapridae and Giraffidae within Pecora are, however, uncertain. While numerous fusions (mostly Robertsonian) have accumulated in the giraffe's karyotype (Giraffa camelopardalis, Giraffidae, 2n = 30), that of the pronghorn (Antilocapra americana, Antilocapridae, 2n = 58) is very similar to the hypothesised pecoran ancestral state (2n = 58). We examined the chromosomal rearrangements of two species, the giraffe and pronghorn, using a combination of fluorescence in situ hybridization painting probes and BAC clones derived from cattle (Bos taurus, Bovidae). Our data place Moschus (Moschidae) closer to Bovidae than Cervidae. Although the alternative (i.e., Moschidae + Cervidae as sister groups) could not be discounted in recent sequence-based analyses, cytogenetics bolsters conclusions that the former is more likely. Additionally, DNA sequences were isolated from the centromeric regions of both species and compared. Analysis of cenDNA show that unlike the pronghorn, the centromeres of the giraffe are probably organized in a more complex fashion comprising different repetitive sequences specific to single chromosomal pairs or groups of chromosomes. The distribution of nucleolar organiser region (NOR) sites, often an effective phylogenetic marker, were also examined in the two species. In the giraffe, the position of NORs seems to be autapomorphic since similar localizations have not been found in other species within Pecora.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Halina Cernohorska
- Veterinary Research Institute, Hudcova 70, 621 00, Brno, Czech Republic.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Hu JY, Zhang YP, Yu L. Summary of Laurasiatheria (mammalia) phylogeny. DONG WU XUE YAN JIU = ZOOLOGICAL RESEARCH 2013; 33:E65-74. [PMID: 23266984 DOI: 10.3724/sp.j.1141.2012.e05-06e65] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Laurasiatheria is one of the richest and most diverse superorders of placental mammals. Because this group had a rapid evolutionary radiation, the phylogenetic relationships among the six orders of Laurasiatheria remain a subject of heated debate and several issues related to its phylogeny remain open. Reconstructing the true phylogenetic relationships of Laurasiatheria is a significant case study in evolutionary biology due to the diversity of this suborder and such research will have significant implications for biodiversity conservation. We review the higher-level (inter-ordinal) phylogenies of Laurasiatheria based on previous cytogenetic, morphological and molecular data, and discuss the controversies of its phylogenetic relationship. This review aims to outline future researches on Laurasiatheria phylogeny and adaptive evolution.
Collapse
|
22
|
Avila F, Das PJ, Kutzler M, Owens E, Perelman P, Rubes J, Hornak M, Johnson WE, Raudsepp T. Development and application of camelid molecular cytogenetic tools. J Hered 2012; 105:858-69. [PMID: 23109720 DOI: 10.1093/jhered/ess067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Cytogenetic chromosome maps offer molecular tools for genome analysis and clinical cytogenetics and are of particular importance for species with difficult karyotypes, such as camelids (2n = 74). Building on the available human-camel zoo-fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) data, we developed the first cytogenetic map for the alpaca (Lama pacos, LPA) genome by isolating and identifying 151 alpaca bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clones corresponding to 44 specific genes. The genes were mapped by FISH to 31 alpaca autosomes and the sex chromosomes; 11 chromosomes had 2 markers, which were ordered by dual-color FISH. The STS gene mapped to Xpter/Ypter, demarcating the pseudoautosomal region, whereas no markers were assigned to chromosomes 14, 21, 22, 28, and 36. The chromosome-specific markers were applied in clinical cytogenetics to identify LPA20, the major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-carrying chromosome, as a part of an autosomal translocation in a sterile male llama (Lama glama, LGL; 2n = 73,XY). FISH with LPAX BACs and LPA36 paints, as well as comparative genomic hybridization, were also used to investigate the origin of the minute chromosome, an abnormally small LPA36 in infertile female alpacas. This collection of cytogenetically mapped markers represents a new tool for camelid clinical cytogenetics and has applications for the improvement of the alpaca genome map and sequence assembly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felipe Avila
- From the Department of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843 (Avila, Das, and Raudsepp); Department of Animal Sciences, College of Agricultural Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331 (Kutzler); Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843 (Owens); Laboratory of Genomic Diversity, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702 (Perelman and Johnson); Laboratory of Cytogenetics of Animals, Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Novosibirsk, Russia (Perelman); and Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic (Rubes and Hornak)
| | - Pranab J Das
- From the Department of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843 (Avila, Das, and Raudsepp); Department of Animal Sciences, College of Agricultural Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331 (Kutzler); Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843 (Owens); Laboratory of Genomic Diversity, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702 (Perelman and Johnson); Laboratory of Cytogenetics of Animals, Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Novosibirsk, Russia (Perelman); and Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic (Rubes and Hornak)
| | - Michelle Kutzler
- From the Department of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843 (Avila, Das, and Raudsepp); Department of Animal Sciences, College of Agricultural Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331 (Kutzler); Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843 (Owens); Laboratory of Genomic Diversity, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702 (Perelman and Johnson); Laboratory of Cytogenetics of Animals, Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Novosibirsk, Russia (Perelman); and Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic (Rubes and Hornak)
| | - Elaine Owens
- From the Department of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843 (Avila, Das, and Raudsepp); Department of Animal Sciences, College of Agricultural Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331 (Kutzler); Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843 (Owens); Laboratory of Genomic Diversity, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702 (Perelman and Johnson); Laboratory of Cytogenetics of Animals, Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Novosibirsk, Russia (Perelman); and Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic (Rubes and Hornak)
| | - Polina Perelman
- From the Department of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843 (Avila, Das, and Raudsepp); Department of Animal Sciences, College of Agricultural Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331 (Kutzler); Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843 (Owens); Laboratory of Genomic Diversity, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702 (Perelman and Johnson); Laboratory of Cytogenetics of Animals, Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Novosibirsk, Russia (Perelman); and Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic (Rubes and Hornak)
| | - Jiri Rubes
- From the Department of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843 (Avila, Das, and Raudsepp); Department of Animal Sciences, College of Agricultural Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331 (Kutzler); Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843 (Owens); Laboratory of Genomic Diversity, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702 (Perelman and Johnson); Laboratory of Cytogenetics of Animals, Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Novosibirsk, Russia (Perelman); and Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic (Rubes and Hornak)
| | - Miroslav Hornak
- From the Department of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843 (Avila, Das, and Raudsepp); Department of Animal Sciences, College of Agricultural Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331 (Kutzler); Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843 (Owens); Laboratory of Genomic Diversity, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702 (Perelman and Johnson); Laboratory of Cytogenetics of Animals, Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Novosibirsk, Russia (Perelman); and Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic (Rubes and Hornak)
| | - Warren E Johnson
- From the Department of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843 (Avila, Das, and Raudsepp); Department of Animal Sciences, College of Agricultural Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331 (Kutzler); Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843 (Owens); Laboratory of Genomic Diversity, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702 (Perelman and Johnson); Laboratory of Cytogenetics of Animals, Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Novosibirsk, Russia (Perelman); and Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic (Rubes and Hornak)
| | - Terje Raudsepp
- From the Department of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843 (Avila, Das, and Raudsepp); Department of Animal Sciences, College of Agricultural Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331 (Kutzler); Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843 (Owens); Laboratory of Genomic Diversity, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702 (Perelman and Johnson); Laboratory of Cytogenetics of Animals, Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Novosibirsk, Russia (Perelman); and Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic (Rubes and Hornak).
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Molecular cytogenetic characterization of the Amazon River dolphin Inia geoffrensis. Genetica 2012; 140:307-15. [PMID: 23010983 DOI: 10.1007/s10709-012-9680-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2012] [Accepted: 09/08/2012] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Classical and molecular cytogenetic (18S rDNA, telomeric sequence, and LINE-1 retrotransposon probes) studies were carried out to contribute to an understanding of the organization of repeated DNA elements in the Amazon River dolphin (boto, Inia geoffrensis). Twenty-seven specimens were examined, each presenting 2n = 44 chromosomes, the karyotype formula 12m + 14sm + 6st + 10t + XX/XY, and fundamental number (FN) = 74. C-positive heterochromatin was observed in terminal and interstitial positions, with the occurrence of polymorphism. Interstitial telomeric sequences were not observed. The nucleolar organizer region (NOR) was located at a single site on a smallest autosomal pair. LINE-1 was preferentially distributed in the euchromatin regions, with the greatest accumulation on the X chromosome. Although the karyotype structure in cetaceans is considered to be conserved, the boto karyotype demonstrated significant variations in its formula, heterochromatin distribution, and the location of the NOR compared to other cetacean species. These results contribute to knowledge of the chromosome organization in boto and to a better understanding of karyoevolution in cetaceans.
Collapse
|
24
|
Fellows E, Kutzler M, Avila F, Das PJ, Raudsepp T. Ovarian dysgenesis in an alpaca with a minute chromosome 36. J Hered 2012; 105:870-4. [PMID: 23008444 DOI: 10.1093/jhered/ess069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
A 4-year-old female alpaca (Lama pacos [LPA]) was presented to the Oregon State Veterinary Teaching Hospital for failure to display receptive behavior to males. Although no abnormalities were found on physical examination, transrectal ultrasonographic examination of the reproductive tract revealed uterine hypoplasia and ovarian dysgenesis. Cytogenetic analysis demonstrated a normal female 74,XX karyotype with 1 exceptionally small (minute) homologue of autosome LPA36. Chromosome analysis by Giemsa staining and DAPI- and C-banding revealed that the minute LPA36 was submetacentric, AT-rich, and largely heterochromatic. Because of the small size and lack of molecular markers, it was not possible to identify the origin of the minute. There is a need to improve molecular cytogenetic tools to further study the phenomenon of this minute chromosome and its relation to female reproduction in alpacas and llamas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Fellows
- From the Department of Animal and Rangeland Science, Oregon State University, 315 Withycombe Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331 (Fellows and Kutzler); and the Department of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Molecular Cytogenetics Laboratory, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX (Avila, Das, and Raudsepp).
| | - Michelle Kutzler
- From the Department of Animal and Rangeland Science, Oregon State University, 315 Withycombe Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331 (Fellows and Kutzler); and the Department of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Molecular Cytogenetics Laboratory, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX (Avila, Das, and Raudsepp)
| | - Felipe Avila
- From the Department of Animal and Rangeland Science, Oregon State University, 315 Withycombe Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331 (Fellows and Kutzler); and the Department of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Molecular Cytogenetics Laboratory, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX (Avila, Das, and Raudsepp)
| | - Pranab J Das
- From the Department of Animal and Rangeland Science, Oregon State University, 315 Withycombe Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331 (Fellows and Kutzler); and the Department of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Molecular Cytogenetics Laboratory, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX (Avila, Das, and Raudsepp)
| | - Terje Raudsepp
- From the Department of Animal and Rangeland Science, Oregon State University, 315 Withycombe Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331 (Fellows and Kutzler); and the Department of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Molecular Cytogenetics Laboratory, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX (Avila, Das, and Raudsepp)
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Rubes J, Musilova P, Kopecna O, Kubickova S, Cernohorska H, Kulemsina AI. Comparative molecular cytogenetics in Cetartiodactyla. Cytogenet Genome Res 2012; 137:194-207. [PMID: 22627059 DOI: 10.1159/000338932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Cetartiodactyla comprises Artiodactyla (even-toed ungulates) and Cetacea (whales, dolphins and porpoises). Artiodactyla is a large taxon represented by about 200 living species ranked in 10 families. Cetacea are classified into 13 families with almost 80 species. Many publications concerning karyotypic relationships in Cetartiodactyla have been published in previous decades. Formerly, the karyotypes of closely related species were compared by chromosome banding. Introduction of molecular cytogenetic methods facilitated comparative mapping between species with highly rearranged karyotypes and distantly related species. Such information is a prerequisite for the understanding of karyotypic phylogeny and the reconstruction of the karyotypes of common ancestors. This study summarizes the data on chromosome evolution in Cetartiodactyla, mainly derived from molecular cytogenetic studies. Traditionally, phylogenetic relationships of most groups have been estimated using morphological data. However, the results of some molecular studies of mammalian phylogeny are discordant with traditional conceptions of phylogeny. Cetartiodactyls provide several examples of incongruence between traditional morphological and molecular data. Such cases of conflict include the relationships of the major clades of artiodactyls, the relationships among the extant families of the suborder Ruminantia or the phylogeny of the family Bovidae. The most unexpected aspect of the molecular phylogeny was the recognition that Cetacea is a deeply nested member of Artiodactyla. The largest living order of terrestrial hoofed mammals is the even-toed hoofed mammals, or Artiodactyla. The artiodactyls are composed of over 190 living species including pigs, peccaries, hippos, camels, llamas, deer, pronghorns, giraffes, sheep, goats, cattle and antelopes. Cetacea is an order of wholly aquatic mammals, which include whales, dolphins and porpoises. Cetartiodactyla has become the generally accepted name for the clade containing both of these orders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Rubes
- Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Nie W, Wang J, Su W, Wang D, Tanomtong A, Perelman PL, Graphodatsky AS, Yang F. Chromosomal rearrangements and karyotype evolution in carnivores revealed by chromosome painting. Heredity (Edinb) 2011; 108:17-27. [PMID: 22086079 PMCID: PMC3238119 DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2011.107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Chromosomal evolution in carnivores has been revisited extensively using cross-species chromosome painting. Painting probes derived from flow-sorted chromosomes of the domestic dog, which has one of the most rearranged karyotypes in mammals and the highest dipoid number (2n=78) in carnivores, are a powerful tool in detecting both evolutionary intra- and inter-chromosomal rearrangements. However, only a few comparative maps have been established between dog and other non-Canidae species. Here, we extended cross-species painting with dog probes to seven more species representing six carnivore families: Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx), the stone marten (Martes foina), the small Indian civet (Viverricula indica), the Asian palm civet (Paradoxurus hermaphrodites), Javan mongoose (Hepestes javanicas), the raccoon (Procyon lotor) and the giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca). The numbers and positions of intra-chromosomal rearrangements were found to differ among these carnivore species. A comparative map between human and stone marten, and a map among the Yangtze finless porpoise (Neophocaena phocaenoides asiaeorientalis), stone marten and human were also established to facilitate outgroup comparison and to integrate comparative maps between stone marten and other carnivores with such maps between human and other species. These comparative maps give further insight into genome evolution and karyotype phylogenetic relationships among carnivores, and will facilitate the transfer of gene mapping data from human, domestic dog and cat to other species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Nie
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Kunming Institute of Zoology, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, PR
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Graphodatsky AS, Trifonov VA, Stanyon R. The genome diversity and karyotype evolution of mammals. Mol Cytogenet 2011; 4:22. [PMID: 21992653 PMCID: PMC3204295 DOI: 10.1186/1755-8166-4-22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 90] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2011] [Accepted: 10/12/2011] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
The past decade has witnessed an explosion of genome sequencing and mapping in evolutionary diverse species. While full genome sequencing of mammals is rapidly progressing, the ability to assemble and align orthologous whole chromosome regions from more than a few species is still not possible. The intense focus on building of comparative maps for companion (dog and cat), laboratory (mice and rat) and agricultural (cattle, pig, and horse) animals has traditionally been used as a means to understand the underlying basis of disease-related or economically important phenotypes. However, these maps also provide an unprecedented opportunity to use multispecies analysis as a tool for inferring karyotype evolution. Comparative chromosome painting and related techniques are now considered to be the most powerful approaches in comparative genome studies. Homologies can be identified with high accuracy using molecularly defined DNA probes for fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on chromosomes of different species. Chromosome painting data are now available for members of nearly all mammalian orders. In most orders, there are species with rates of chromosome evolution that can be considered as 'default' rates. The number of rearrangements that have become fixed in evolutionary history seems comparatively low, bearing in mind the 180 million years of the mammalian radiation. Comparative chromosome maps record the history of karyotype changes that have occurred during evolution. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of these recent advances in our endeavor to decipher the karyotype evolution of mammals by integrating the published results together with some of our latest unpublished results.
Collapse
|
28
|
|
29
|
Kulemzina AI, Yang F, Trifonov VA, Ryder OA, Ferguson-Smith MA, Graphodatsky AS. Chromosome painting in Tragulidae facilitates the reconstruction of Ruminantia ancestral karyotype. Chromosome Res 2011; 19:531-9. [PMID: 21445689 DOI: 10.1007/s10577-011-9201-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2011] [Revised: 03/11/2011] [Accepted: 03/13/2011] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Although Tragulidae, as the basal family in Ruminantia phylogenetic tree, is the key taxon for understanding the early chromosome evolution of extant ruminants, comparative molecular cytogenetic data on the tragulids are scarce. Here, we present the first genome-wide comparative map of the Java mouse deer (Tragulus javanicus, Tragulidae) revealed by chromosome painting with human and dromedary probes. Together with the published comparative maps of major representative cetartiodactyl species established with the same set of probes, our results allowed us to reconstruct a 2n = 48 Ruminantia ancestral karyotype, which is similar to the cetartiodactyl ancestral karyotype. The karyotype evolution of T. javanicus has involved multiple rearrangements, most of which appear to be apomorphic and have not found in karyotype evolution of pecoran species (i.e., Ruminantia excluding Tragulidae). The rate of chromosome evolution of the mouse deer was rather low-0.4 R/Ma, while the estimated tempo of chromosome changes on the lineages leading from Cetartiodactyla ancestor to Ruminantia and from Ruminantia to Pecora were roughly the same (about 1.2 R/Ma).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anastasia I Kulemzina
- Molecular and Cellular Biology Department, Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, SB RAS, 630090, Novosibirsk, Russia.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Doležel J, Kubaláková M, Cíhalíková J, Suchánková P, Simková H. Chromosome analysis and sorting using flow cytometry. Methods Mol Biol 2011; 701:221-38. [PMID: 21181533 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-61737-957-4_12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Chromosome analysis and sorting using flow cytometry (flow cytogenetics) is an attractive tool for fractionating plant genomes to small parts. The reduction of complexity greatly simplifies genetics and genomics in plant species with large genomes. However, as flow cytometry requires liquid suspensions of particles, the lack of suitable protocols for preparation of solutions of intact chromosomes delayed the application of flow cytogenetics in plants. This chapter outlines a high-yielding procedure for preparation of solutions of intact mitotic chromosomes from root tips of young seedlings and for their analysis using flow cytometry and sorting. Root tips accumulated at metaphase are mildly fixed with formaldehyde, and solutions of intact chromosomes are prepared by mechanical homogenization. The advantages of the present approach include the use of seedlings, which are easy to handle, and the karyological stability of root meristems, which can be induced to high degree of metaphase synchrony. Chromosomes isolated according to this protocol have well-preserved morphology, withstand shearing forces during sorting, and their DNA is intact and suitable for a range of applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaroslav Doležel
- Laboratory of Molecular Cytogenetics and Cytometry, Institute of Experimental Botany, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. Comparative genomics reveals birth and death of fragile regions in mammalian evolution. Genome Biol 2010; 11:R117. [PMID: 21118492 PMCID: PMC3156956 DOI: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-11-r117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2010] [Revised: 10/05/2010] [Accepted: 11/30/2010] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background An important question in genome evolution is whether there exist fragile regions (rearrangement hotspots) where chromosomal rearrangements are happening over and over again. Although nearly all recent studies supported the existence of fragile regions in mammalian genomes, the most comprehensive phylogenomic study of mammals raised some doubts about their existence. Results Here we demonstrate that fragile regions are subject to a birth and death process, implying that fragility has a limited evolutionary lifespan. Conclusions This finding implies that fragile regions migrate to different locations in different mammals, explaining why there exist only a few chromosomal breakpoints shared between different lineages. The birth and death of fragile regions as a phenomenon reinforces the hypothesis that rearrangements are promoted by matching segmental duplications and suggests putative locations of the currently active fragile regions in the human genome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max A Alekseyev
- Department of Computer Science & Engineering, University of South Carolina, 301 Main St, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Boisserie JR, Fisher RE, Lihoreau F, Weston EM. Evolving between land and water: key questions on the emergence and history of the Hippopotamidae (Hippopotamoidea, Cetancodonta, Cetartiodactyla). Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 2010; 86:601-25. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-185x.2010.00162.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
33
|
Stanyon R, Bigoni F. Primate chromosome evolution: with reference to marker order and neocentromeres. RUSS J GENET+ 2010. [DOI: 10.1134/s102279541009019x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
34
|
Kulemzina I, Biltueva LS, Trifonov VA, Perelman PL, Staroselec YY, Beklemisheva VR, Vorobieva NV, Serdukova NA, Graphodatsky AS. Comparative cytogenetics of main Laurasiatheria taxa. RUSS J GENET+ 2010. [DOI: 10.1134/s1022795410090322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|