Low BRAF and NRAS expression levels are associated with clinical benefit from DTIC therapy and prognosis in metastatic melanoma

Bacillus Calmette-Guérin Immunotherapy for Cancer

Bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG), an attenuated vaccine from Mycobacterium bovis, was initially developed as an agent for vaccination against tuberculosis. BCG proved to be the first successful immunotherapy against established human bladder cancer and other neoplasms. The use of BCG has been shown to induce a long-lasting antitumor response over all other forms of treatment against intermediate, non-invasive muscle bladder cancer Several types of tumors may now be treated by releasing the immune response through the blockade of checkpoint inhibitory molecules, such as CTLA-4 and PD-1. In addition, Toll-Like Receptor (TLR) agonists and BCG are used to potentiate the immune response against tumors. Studies concerning TLR-ligands combined with BCG to treat melanoma have demonstrated efficacy in treating mice and patients This review addresses several interventions using BCG on neoplasms, such as Leukemia, Bladder Cancer, Lung Cancer, and Melanoma, describing treatments and antitumor responses promoted by this attenuated bacillus. Of essential importance, BCG is described recently to participate in an adequate microbiome, establishing an effective response during cell-target therapy when combined with anti-PD-1 antibody, which stimulates T cell responses against the melanoma. Finally, trained immunity is discussed, and reprogramming events to shape innate immune responses are addressed.

BRAF mutational status as a prognostic marker for survival in malignant melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: The analysis of the BRAF mutational status has been established as a standard procedure during diagnosis of advanced malignant melanoma due to the fact that BRAF inhibitors constitute a cornerstone in the treatment of metastatic disease. However, the general impact of BRAF mutational status on survival remains unclear. Our study aimed to assess the underlying prognostic significance of BRAF mutant versus wild type (WT) malignant melanoma on overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and progression-free survival (PFS).Material and methods: A systematic literature search in EMBASE, Medline and Cochrane CENTRAL was performed. Studies were included if they reported survival outcomes for BRAF mutant versus WT patients as hazard ratios (HR) or in Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves. Random-effects meta-analysis models were used to pool HRs across the studies.Results: Data from 52 studies, representing 7519 patients, were pooled for analysis of OS. The presence of a BRAF mutation was statistically significantly associated with a reduced OS (HR [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 1.23 [1.09-1.38]), however, with substantial heterogeneity between the studies (I²: 58.0%). Meta-regression and sensitivity analyses showed that age, sex and BRAF mutation testing method did not have a significant effect on the OS HR. BRAF mutant melanoma showed comparable effect on DFS to non-BRAF mutant melanoma in stage I-III melanoma (combined HR: 1.16, 95% CI: 0.92-1.46), and on PFS in stage III-IV (HR: 0.98 (95% CI: 0.68-1.40)).Conclusion: Although there was substantial heterogeneity between the studies, the overall results demonstrated a poorer prognosis and OS in patients harbouring BRAF mutations. Future studies should take this into account when evaluating epidemiological data and treatment effects of new interventions in patients with malignant melanoma.

Differential responsiveness to BRAF inhibitors of melanoma cell lines BRAF V600E-mutated

Background

Most mutations in melanoma affect one critical amino acid on BRAF gene, resulting in the V600E substitution. Patient management is often based on the use of specific inhibitors targeting this mutation.

Methods

DNA and RNA mutation status was assessed in 15 melanoma cell lines by Sanger sequencing and RNA-seq. We tested the cell lines responsiveness to BRAF inhibitors (vemurafenib and PLX4720, BRAF-specific and sorafenib, BRAF non-specific). Cell proliferation was assessed by MTT colorimetric assay. BRAF V600E RNA expression was assessed by qPCR. Expression level of phosphorylated-ERK protein was assessed by Western Blotting as marker of BRAF activation.

Results

Three cell lines were discordant in the mutation detection (BRAF V600E at DNA level/Sanger sequencing and BRAF WT on RNA-seq). We initially postulated that those cell lines may express only the WT allele at the RNA level although mutated at the DNA level. A more careful analysis showed that they express low level of BRAF RNA and the expression may be in favor of the WT allele. We tested whether the discordant cell lines responded differently to BRAF-specific inhibitors. Their proliferation rate decreased after treatment with vemurafenib and PLX4720 but was not affected by sorafenib, suggesting a BRAF V600E biological behavior. Yet, responsiveness to the BRAF specific inhibitors was lower as compared to the control. Western Blot analysis revealed a decreased expression of p-ERK protein in the BRAF V600E control cell line and in the discordant cell lines upon treatment with BRAF-specific inhibitors. The discordant cell lines showed a lower responsiveness to BRAF inhibitors when compared to the BRAF V600E control cell line. The results obtained from the inhibition experiment and molecular analyses were also confirmed in three additional cell lines.

Conclusion

Cell lines carrying V600E mutation at the DNA level may respond differently to BRAF targeted treatment potentially due to a lower V600E RNA expression.

SHARPIN Promotes Melanoma Progression via Rap1 Signaling Pathway

SHARPIN, as a tumor-associated gene, is involved in the metastatic process of many kinds of tumors. Herein, we studied the function of Shank-associated RH domain interacting protein (SHARPIN) in melanoma metastasis and the relevant molecular mechanisms. We found that SHARPIN expression was increased in melanoma tissues and activated the process of proliferation, migration, and invasion in vitro and in vivo, resulting in a poor prognosis of the disease. Functional analysis demonstrated that SHARPIN promoted melanoma migration and invasion by regulating Ras-associated protein-1(Rap1) and its downstream pathways, including p38 and JNK/c-Jun. Rap1 activator (8-pCPT-2'-O-Me-cAMP) and inhibitor (ESI-09 and farnesylthiosalicylic acid-amide) treatments could partially rescue invasion and migration of tumor cells. Additionally, SHARPIN expression in cell lines and public datasets also indicated that molecules other than BRAF and N-RAS may contribute to SHARPIN activation. In conclusion, our broad-in-depth work suggests that SHARPIN promotes melanoma development via p38 and JNK/c-Jun pathways through upregulation of Rap1 expression.

Prognostic Value of NRAS Gene for Survival of Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction: NRAS gene is associated with malignant proliferation and metastasis of colorectal cancer (CRC). But its prognostic value on CRC is still unknown. The objective of this study is to perform a meta-analysis to obtain its prognostic value on survival of CRC patients. Methods: The systematic review and meta-analysis was designed, undertaken and reported using items from the PRISMA statement. Relevant articles were identified through PubMed (containing Medline), Embase, Web of Science databases and Google scholar search engines from their inception up to October 3, 2016. The articles about NRAS on prognosis of CRC patients were enrolled. The association between NRAS and CRC survival time (including overall survival [OS], progression-free survival [PFS], and disease-free survival [DFS]) was evaluated using hazard ratio (HR) with its corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: A total of fifteen articles were included. High-expression of NRAS was significantly associated with poor OS (HR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.15–1.61), and poor PFS (HR: 1.75, 95% CI: 1.04–2.94). The combined HR of NRAS on DFS was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.37–2.03). Subgroup analysis showed that NRAS was significantly associated with poor OS for patients from Western countries (HR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.09–1.73), but not for those from Asian countries. Conclusions: This meta-analysis demonstrate that NRAS gene could predict the poor prognosis for the CRC patients. More large-sample cohort studies are needed to further confirm this conclusion.

KRAS overexpression independent of RAS mutations confers an adverse prognosis in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia

The prognostic value of RAS mutations has been systematically investigated in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, clinical significance of RAS expressions in AML remains poorly determined. To explore the clinical significance, we analyzed KRAS and NRAS expressions in 143 de novo AML patients by real-time quantitative PCR. KRAS and NRAS expressions were significantly up-regulated in AML patients. KRAS and NRAS mutations were identified in 4% (6/143) and 8% (12/143) of these patients, respectively. However, no significant association was observed between RAS mutations and expressions. High KRAS expression was associated with older age, higher white blood cells, and a tendency of higher platelets, whereas high NRAS expression was only correlated with older age. Complete remission (CR) rate and overall survival of AML patients were adversely affected by KRAS overexpression, but not NRAS overexpression. Multivariate analysis revealed that KRAS acted as an independent prognostic predictor in cytogenetically normal AML (CN-AML). Moreover, the prognostic value of KRAS expression was validated using the published data from Gene Expression Omnibus datasets. In the follow-up patients, KRAS expression rather than NRAS expression in CR time tended to decrease compared to newly diagnosis time, and both KRAS and NRAS expressions were significantly increased when in relapse time. Our findings revealed that RAS overexpression and mutations were common events in AML with potential therapeutic target value. KRAS overexpression independent of RAS mutations conferred an adverse prognosis in CN-AML.

Next-Generation Sequencing Reveals Pathway Activations and New Routes to Targeted Therapies in Cutaneous Metastatic Melanoma

BACKGROUND

Comprehensive genomic profiling of clinical samples by next-generation sequencing (NGS) can identify one or more therapy targets for the treatment of metastatic melanoma (MM) with a single diagnostic test.

METHODS

NGS was performed on hybridization-captured, adaptor ligation-based libraries using DNA extracted from 4 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections cut at 10 microns from 30 MM cases. The exons of 182 cancer-related genes were fully sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq 2000 at an average sequencing depth of 1098X and evaluated for genomic alterations (GAs) including point mutations, insertions, deletions, copy number alterations, and select gene fusions/rearrangements. Clinically relevant GAs (CRGAs) were defined as those identifying commercially available targeted therapeutics or therapies in registered clinical trials.

RESULTS

The 30 American Joint Committee on Cancer Stage IV MM included 17 (57%) male and 13 (43%) female patients with a mean age of 59.5 years (range 41-83 years). All MM samples had at least 1 GA, and an average of 2.7 GA/sample (range 1-7) was identified. The mean number of GA did not differ based on age or sex; however, on average, significantly more GAs were identified in amelanotic and poorly differentiated MM. GAs were most commonly identified in BRAF (12 cases, 40%), CDKN2A (6 cases, 20%), NF1 (8 cases, 26.7%), and NRAS (6 cases, 20%). CRGAs were identified in all patients, and represented 77% of the GA (64/83) detected. The median and mean CRGAs per tumor were 2 and 2.1, respectively (range 1-7).

CONCLUSION

Comprehensive genomic profiling of MM, using a single diagnostic test, uncovers an unexpectedly high number of CRGA that would not be identified by standard of care testing. Moreover, NGS has the potential to influence therapy selection and can direct patients to enter relevant clinical trials evaluating promising targeted therapies.

N-RAS expression in patients with salivary adenoid cystic carcinoma: association with clinicopathologic features and prognosis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate N-RAS expression in patients with salivary adenoid cystic carcinoma (SACC) and to analyze its association with clinicopathologic features and prognosis.

STUDY DESIGN

We determined N-RAS expression in SACC tumors via immunohistochemistry and evaluated the association between N-RAS expression and clinicopathologic variables. The disease-free survival (DFS) curves were plotted by using the Kaplan-Meier method. The parameters of prognostic significance found by univariate analysis were tested by a multivariate Cox regression model.

RESULTS

N-RAS expression was detected in 61 of 72 SACC tumor samples (84.7%). In univariate analyses, N-RAS expression was associated with clinical stage, tumor size, adjacent tissue invasion, and distant metastasis. N-RAS expression was associated with DFS in univariate analysis; however, in multivariate analysis, N-RAS was not an independent prognostic indicator, but clinical stage (0.04) and histologic subtype (0.02) were statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that N-RAS was overexpressed in SACC tissues, but was not an independent prognostic indicator of DFS. Only clinical stage and histologic subtype were prognostic indicators of DFS.

Performance comparison of three BRAF V600E detection methods in malignant melanoma and colorectal cancer specimens

Personalized cancer care requires reliable biomarkers. While the BRAF V600E mutation is implemented in the clinic, no method for its detection has so far been established as reference. We aimed to perform a comprehensive comparison of three methods currently being used for V600E detection in clinical samples. We analysed genomic DNA from 127 malignant melanomas (77 patients) and 389 tumours from 141 colorectal cancer patients (383 liver metastases and 6 primary tumours) by Sanger sequencing and a single probe-based high-resolution melting assay (LightMix). Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue from a subset of these lesions (n = 77 and 304, respectively) was analysed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) using the V600E-specific antibody VE1. In a dilution series of V600E-mutated DNA in wild-type DNA, the detection limit for the LightMix assay was 1:1000 mutated alleles while it was 1:10 for Sanger sequencing. In line with this, we detected 15 additional mutated melanoma samples and two additional mutated metastatic colorectal cancer samples by the LightMix assay compared to Sanger sequencing. For the melanoma samples, we observed high concordance between DNA-based methods and analysis by IHC. However, in colorectal samples, IHC performed poorly with 12 samples being scored as V600E positive exclusively by IHC and nine samples being scored as V600E negative exclusively by IHC. In conclusion, the VE1 antibody is not recommendable for clinical tests of colorectal cancer samples. For melanoma samples, IHC may be useful as a screening tool guiding further analytical approaches.

Nras in melanoma: targeting the undruggable target

RAS belongs to the guanosine 5'-triphosphate (GTP)-binding proteins' family, and oncogenic mutations in codons 12, 13, or 61 of RAS family occur in approximately one third of all human cancers with N-RAS mutations found in about 15-20% of melanomas. The importance of RAS signaling as a potential target in cancer is emphasized not only by the prevalence of RAS mutations, but also by the high number of RAS activators and effectors identified in mammalian cells that places the RAS proteins at the crossroads of several, important signaling networks. Ras proteins are crucial crossroads of signaling pathways that link the activation of cell surface receptors with a wide variety of cellular processes leading to the control of proliferation, apoptosis and differentiation. Furthermore, oncogenic ras proteins interfere with metabolism of tumor cells, microenvironment's remodeling, evasion of the immune response, and finally contributes to the metastatic process. After 40 years of basic, translational and clinical research, much is now known about the molecular mechanisms by which these monomeric guanosine triphosphatase-binding proteins promote cellular malignancy, and it is clear that they regulate signaling pathways involved in the control of cell proliferation, survival, and invasiveness. In this review we summarize the biological role of RAS in cancer by focusing our attention on the biological rational and strategies to target RAS in melanoma.

Clinicopathologic features and survival in Spitzoid malignant melanoma and conventional malignant melanoma

BACKGROUND

Although recent advances in genetics have revealed distinct mutational profiles and molecular signaling pathways associated with Spitzoid malignant melanoma (SMM), less is known about the clinicopathologic characteristics and behavior of SMM compared with conventional melanoma.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine the clinicopathologic characteristics and mortality risk associated with SMM and conventional malignant melanoma.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of 30 patients with SMM and 30 patients with conventional melanoma. The two groups were matched by age, gender, and depth of tumor invasion. Additional patient- and tumor-level characteristics were compared between groups and regression modeling was used to assess relative mortality risk.

RESULTS

Unadjusted analyses of SMM and conventional malignant melanoma revealed no significant differences in clinical impression, anatomic location, mitotic rate, and presence of ulceration. Sentinel lymph node biopsy, completion lymphadenectomy, and visceral metastases did not differ between groups. Cox proportional hazards regression showed no differences in mortality between Spitzoid and conventional melanoma.

LIMITATIONS

Small sample size, short follow-up duration, and residual confounding may limit the accuracy and generalizability of our results.

CONCLUSIONS

SMM and conventional malignant melanoma differ in some clinicopathologic features. We did not find a statistically significant difference in mortality between the two.

MEK targeting in N-RAS mutated metastatic melanoma

Background

Gain of function mutations in B-RAF and N-RAS occur frequently in melanoma, leading to mitogen activating protein kinase (MAPK) pathway activation, and this pathway is the target of drugs in development. Our purpose was to study clinical characteristics of patients with mutations in this pathway and to determine activity of inhibitors of B-RAF and MEK in short term cultures grown from tumors of some of these patients.

Methods

Clinical and pathologic data were collected retrospectively on melanoma patients tested for B-RAF and N-RAS mutations at the Yale Cancer Center and associations with survival were determined. We studied in vitro activity of the pan-RAF inhibitor, RAF265, and the MEK inhibitor, MEK162, in 22 melanoma short term cultures. We further characterized the effect of MEK inhibition on apoptosis and growth of melanoma cultures.

Results

In a cohort of 144 metastatic melanoma patients we found that patients with N-RAS mutant melanoma had a worse prognosis. These patients were more likely to have brain metastases at the time of presentation with metastatic disease than their N-RAS-wild-type counterparts. All N-RAS mutant melanoma cultures tested in our study (n = 7) were sensitive to MEK inhibition162. Exposure to MEK162 reduced ERK1/2 phosphorylation, and induced apoptosis. Clonogenic survival was significantly reduced in sensitive melanoma cell cultures.

Conclusions

The prognosis of patients with melanoma expressing constitutively active N-RAS is poor, consistent with studies performed at other institutions. N-RAS mutant melanoma cultures appear to be particularly sensitive to MEK162, supporting ongoing clinical trials with MEK162 in N-RAS mutated melanoma.