How Does Anxiety Affect Adults with Skin Disease? Examining the Indirect Effect of Anxiety Symptoms on Impairment Through Anxiety Sensitivity

Phenotypic distinctions in depression and anxiety: a comparative analysis of comorbid and isolated cases

BACKGROUND

Anxiety and depression are frequently comorbid yet phenotypically distinct. This study identifies differences in the clinically observable phenome across a wide variety of physical and mental disorders comparing patients with diagnoses of depression without anxiety, anxiety without depression, or both depression and anxiety.

METHODS

Using electronic health records for 14 994 participants with depression and/or anxiety in the Mayo Clinic Biobank, a phenotype-based phenome-wide association study (Phe2WAS) was performed to test for differences between these groups across a broad range of clinical diagnoses observed in the electronic health record. Additional analyses were performed to determine the temporal sequencing of diagnoses.

RESULTS

Compared to patients diagnosed only with anxiety, those diagnosed only with depression were more likely to have diagnoses of obesity (OR 1.75; p = 1 × 10-27), sleep apnea (OR 1.71; p = 1 × 10-22), and type II diabetes (OR 1.74; p = 9 × 10-18). Compared to those diagnosed only with depression, those diagnosed only with anxiety were more likely to have diagnoses of palpitations (OR 1.91; p = 2 × 10-25), benign skin neoplasms (OR 1.61; p = 2 × 10-17), and cardiac dysrhythmias (OR 1.45; p = 2 × 10-12). Patients with comorbid depression and anxiety were more likely to have diagnoses of other mental health disorders, substance use disorders, sleep problems, and gastroesophageal reflux relative to isolated depression.

CONCLUSIONS

While depression and anxiety are closely related, this study suggests that phenotypic distinctions exist between depression and anxiety. Improving phenotypic characterization within the broad categories of depression and anxiety could improve the clinical assessment of depression and anxiety.

[Comparison of balneotherapy and balneotherapy combined with magnetic-laser therapy at a sanatorium-resort stage of treatment of patients with eczema]

The search for new rational ways to improve the effectiveness of treatment and rehabilitation measures of patients with true eczema continues to be one of the pressing issues in modern clinical dermatology.

OBJECTIVE

The comparative analysis of influence of different variants of SCL: balneotherapy and balneotherapy combined with magnetic laser therapy on the dermatological status, IL-4 and IL-13 level, psycho-emotional state and QOL evaluation in patients with true eczema.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study involved 112 patients with true eczema undergoing spa treatment (SCR) (54 in the balneotherapy group and 58 in the balneotherapy group combined with magnetic laser therapy. The effectiveness of SCR was assessed using the EASI, HARS and MADRS scales, and the DLQI questionnaire. The dynamics of IL-4 and IL-13 plasma levels were studied. The duration of the study was 6 months and 14 days.

RESULTS

After 14 days of SCR, a statistically significant reduction of the EASI index was more pronounced in the balneotherapy group in combination with MLT compared to the balneotherapy group (p=0.041). Balneotherapy combined with MLT contributed to a statistically significant reduction in the HARS and HDRS scores. The decrease in IL-4 and IL-13 levels was statistically more significant in the balneotherapy group in combination with MLT. The combined use of balneotherapy and MLT in comparison with the balneotherapy group was accompanied by a more pronounced improvement in QOL. The combined use of balneotherapy and MLT in the follow-up phase showed a long-term positive effect: 6 months after completing SCR, the number of patients who had clinical remission was statistically significantly higher than that of the balneotherapy group (87.4% vs 22.5%).

CONCLUSION

The combined use of balneotherapy and MLT compared with balneotherapy in patients with true eczema on SCR was shown to be advantageous. The complex application of balneotherapy and MLT decreases inflammatory biomarker scores, improves dermatological and psychoemotional status, QOL parameters and is well tolerated.

Anxiety sensitivity and social anxiety in adults with psychodermatological symptoms

Many dermatology patients experience social anxiety symptoms; however, few studies have investigated vulnerabilities contributing to this distress. Anxiety sensitivity (AS), or the fear of the consequences of anxiety, warrants consideration given its association with social anxiety and dermatological symptoms, respectively. The purpose of this investigation was to investigate the role of AS in social anxiety symptoms in two samples of adults with psychodermatological conditions. AS social, but not physical or cognitive, concerns were hypothesized to demonstrate unique associations with social anxiety symptoms after controlling for relevant variables. Participants completed self-report measures online (Study 1) or in-person (Study 2). Study 1 included 164 participants with active skin conditions (M_age = 31.88; 69.5% female; 83.5% White), and Study 2 included 63 dermatology outpatients (M_age = 51.49; 70.7% female; 65% White). Results revealed AS social concerns was a unique factor contributing to social anxiety symptoms in both samples. This study demonstrates replication, and the findings suggest heightened concerns about the negative consequences related to visible skin conditions may worsen social anxiety symptoms in individuals with psychodermatological conditions. Despite limitations, this study informs the conceptualization of co-occurring psychological and dermatological conditions and highlights the need to evaluate the efficacy of brief AS interventions among patients with psychodermatological conditions.

Examining the cross-sectional and longitudinal effects of anxiety sensitivity on indicators of disease severity among patients with inflammatory arthritis

Few studies have investigated anxiety sensitivity (AS) in the context of inflammatory arthritis (IA), despite evidence of a relationship between AS and pain. This study examined cross-sectional and longitudinal relationships between AS and indicators of IA severity in 148 participants with IA. AS and its factors (social, physical, cognitive) were self-reported. Arthritis severity was physician-assessed (disease activity scales) and self-reported (physical function; pain and fatigue). Cross-sectional correlations assessed the association between AS and arthritis severity outcomes. Longitudinal multivariable mixed-effect regressions assessed the association of AS total and AS factors at each visit with disease severity outcomes. All AS factors were significantly and positively correlated (at the same visit) with function, pain, and fatigue. AS total significantly predicted pain, fatigue, and function. Cognitive AS significantly predicted fatigue, and physical AS significantly predicted pain and fatigue. Social AS significantly predicted pain, fatigue, function and weighted joint count (articular burden). AS is associated with several indicators of disease severity among those with IA; unique findings emerged across factors with the broadest disease impact by social AS. The AS factors, especially social AS, may contribute to the development and severity of IA symptoms, which may have implications for interventions.