Early Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Seroclearance Following Antiviral Treatment in Patients with Reactivation of Resolved Hepatitis B

Predictive factors and clinical outcomes in decompensated non-cirrhotic chronic hepatitis B patients treated with entecavir or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Little is known about the short-term and long-term outcomes of non-cirrhotic chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients who experience hepatic decompensation. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of decompensated non-cirrhotic CHB patients.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study and enrolled a total of 304 decompensated non-cirrhotic CHB patients. Cox regression model was used to analyze factors associated with all-cause mortality. Additionally, the incidence of HBsAg seroclearance and its associated factors were estimated by the competing risk analysis.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 4.36 years (IQR 1.04-7.16). Out of the total enrolled patients, 63 (20.72 %) patients either died or underwent liver transplantation, and 14 patients achieved HBsAg seroclearance. Risk factors associated with 1-month, 3-month, and long-term all-cause mortality were the presence of ascites and hepatic encephalopathy, baseline HBV DNA levels, and MELD scores. The cumulative incidence of HBsAg seroclearance was 1.78 %, 3.72 %, 4.25 %, 5.68 %, 5.68 %, 8.28 %, and 8.28 % at the 1-year, 2-year, 3-year, 4-year, 5-year, 6-year, and 7-year follow-up, respectively. Independent predictors for HBsAg seroclearance were baseline alanine aminotransferase (ALT)≧ 25 times upper limit of normal (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR] = 5.97; 95 %CI, 1.82-19.63; p = 0.0032) and HBV DNA <5 log10 IU/ml (sHR = 4.43; 95 %CI, 1.55-12.63; p = 0.0054).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of ascites and hepatic encephalopathy, baseline HBV DNA levels, and MELD scores were associated with short-term and long-term all-cause mortality. Additionally, lower HBV DNA levels and higher ALT levels at baseline were independently predictive of sequential HBsAg seroclearance.

Updated recommendations for the management of hepatitis B, C, and E virus infections in patients with haematological malignancies and those undergoing haematopoietic cell transplantation: recommendations from the 9th European Conference on Infections in Leukaemia (ECIL-9)

Viral hepatitis remains a global health challenge and immune status affects outcomes. In patients with haematological malignancies, including haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation recipients, viral hepatitis can be life-threatening due to the direct effects of the virus or the need to modify or delay chemotherapy. Additionally, haematopoietic stem-cell donors with past or current viral hepatitis infections might transmit the virus to recipients. The growing recognition of hepatitis E virus (HEV), advances in haematological therapies, and the availability of direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C virus (HCV), led the 2022 9th European Conference on Infections in Leukaemia (ECIL-9) to update the 2013 ECIL-5 guidelines on viral hepatitis. The ECIL organising committee convened a panel of 13 impartial international experts (all authors of this Review) in viral hepatitis, both within and outside the fields of haematological malignancies and immunosuppression. The ECIL-9 panel conducted a review of the literature on hepatitis B virus (HBV), HCV, and HEV, grading the evidence based on the European Society for Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases system. The panel identified key clinical questions and outcomes and built on the recommendations established during ECIL-5. A consensus conference was held in Sofia Antipolis, France, from Sept 15-17, 2022, bringing together 49 experts from 19 countries. The ECIL-9 panel presented the proposed recommendations, which were revised following expert discussions. A final consensus on updated guidelines was reached in a second plenary session. The updated ECIL-9 guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations on the prevention, screening, treatment, and long-term surveillance of viral hepatitis in patients with haematological malignancies and haematopoietic cell transplantation recipients.

Hepatitis B Virus Infection in Patients Receiving Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Considering a steady increase in the number of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantations (allo-HSCT) worldwide and the significant proportion of the world’s population that has been exposed to hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, HBV reactivation following allo-HSCT remains an important issue for post-transplant morbidity and mortality. Antiviral prophylaxis can reduce HBV replication, severity of HBV-related hepatitis, and mortality; therefore, identification of patients at risk is crucial. It is recommended that all recipients and donors should be screened for active or prior HBV infection, including HBsAg, antiHBc, and antiHBs. Adoptive immunity transfer from the donor seems to have protective effects against HBV reactivation. Antiviral prophylaxis should be initiated in all HBsAg-positive patients. HBsAg-negative, antiHBc-positive patients remain at risk; therefore, antiviral prophylaxis should be considered if baseline serum HBV DNA is detectable. In HBsAg-negative, antiHBc-positive patients without detectable HBV DNA, close monitoring of viral load with an on-demand therapy is necessary. Entecavir or tenofovir rather than lamivudine are more appropriate for the emergence of lamivudine resistance. The treatment duration remains unclear, with 6- to 12-month therapy after cessation of immunosuppressive therapy commonly recommended. Here we review the updated evidence and recent recommendations regarding HBV reactivation in patients undergoing allo-HSCT for individualized therapy.

Reactivation of Resolved Hepatitis B After Daratumumab for Multiple Myeloma

The risk of reactivation of resolved hepatitis B virus (HBV) in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative multiple myeloma patients after daratumumab has not been reported. Among 93 patients with daratumumab treatment, reactivation occurred in 6 patients (6.5%) with one hepatic failure. This is the first report demonstrating a considerable risk of reactivation of resolved HBV after daratumumab.

Long-Term Safety of Rituximab (Risks of Viral and Opportunistic Infections)

Purpose of Review

We reviewed the current data on infections associated with rituximab use published over the last 5 years.

Recent Findings

New literature was available on rates of serious infections, Hepatitis B reactivation and screening, and infection with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2.

Summary

Rates of infection varied by study and population, however, higher risk of infection in patients with underlying rheumatologic diseases was seen in those who required a therapy switch, had a smoking history, and those undergoing retreatment who had a serious infection with their first course of therapy. With regards to HBV, the proportion of patients screened continues to be inadequate. Despite the upfront cost, HBV screening and prophylaxis were found to be cost effective. There is still limited data regarding COVID-19 severity in the setting of rituximab, however, rituximab, especially in combination with steroids, may lead to more severe disease and higher mortality.

Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation with Discontinuation of Nucleoside Analogue in Patients Who Received Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) is known to occur frequently after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The reactivation can be prevented by nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA), but it is unclear how long NA should be continued. Here, we report 3 cases of HBV reactivation with discontinuation of NA following the discontinuation of immunosuppressive therapies after HSCT. Three male patients aged 34, 59, and 54 years received allogeneic HSCT (allo-HSCT) for chronic myeloid leukemia, mixed phenotype acute leukemia, and myelodysplastic syndrome, respectively. Before HSCT, 2 patients were positive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and 1 patient was negative for HBsAg and positive for antibodies to hepatitis B core antigen. NA (lamivudine or entecavir) was started at the same time as HSCT and stopped after the discontinuation of immunosuppressive therapies. In all patients, the serum HBV DNA levels were increased after the discontinuation of NAs. Two of the three patients developed severe hepatitis with high levels of HBV DNA (7.5 and 7.4 log IU/mL, respectively). A patient without hepatitis was re-administered NA soon after the HBV DNA started to increase (3.3 log IU/mL). Interestingly, the 2 patients who developed hepatitis cleared HBsAg promptly after the recovery from hepatitis and they could stop NAs without the reversion of HBsAg. It was speculated that transplanted immune cells, which were naïve for HBV, react strongly with HBV antigens that were increased after the NA discontinuation. The discontinuation of NA after allo-HSCT is not recommended generally because strong hepatitis might be induced even after several years.

Management of Hepatitis B Virus in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

The high morbidity of HBV reactivation following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is partially due to the intense immunologic potency of complex therapeutic regimens, the use of antithymocyte globulin and calcineurin inhibitors to prevent graft versus-host disease (GVHD), prolonged immune reconstitution, and hematological malignancies infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV). Immunosuppression results in the reactivation of HBV replication from covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) residing in hepatocytes. However, the role of viral mutations during HBV reactivation needs to be validated. All individuals scheduled to receive allo-HSCT or wish to donate stem cells should be screened for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), antibodies to hepatitis B core (anti-HBc), and HBV-DNA. HBsAg-positive recipients of allo-HSCT have a high risk of HBV reactivation; thus, they should receive prophylactic antiviral therapy. The high barrier to resistance nucleos(t)-ide analogs (NAs) seems to be superior to the low barrier agents. Resolved-HBV recipients have a lower risk of HBV reactivation than HBsAg-positive recipients. Although prophylactic antiviral therapy remains controversial, regular monitoring of alanine transaminase (ALT) and HBV-DNA combined with preemptive antiviral treatment may be an optimized strategy. However, optimal antiviral therapy duration and time intervals for monitoring remain to be established. Accepting stem cells from HBsAg-positive donors is associated with a risk of developing HBV-related hepatitis. The overall intervention strategy, including donors and recipients, may decrease the risk of HBV-related hepatitis following HSCT from HBsAg positive stem cells. In this review, we summarize the issues of HBV in allo-HSCT, including HBV reactivation mechanism, HBsAg-positive recipients, HBV-resolved infection recipients, and donor-related factors, and discuss their significance.