1
|
Clough J, Colwill M, Poullis A, Pollok R, Patel K, Honap S. Biomarkers in inflammatory bowel disease: a practical guide. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2024; 17:17562848241251600. [PMID: 38737913 PMCID: PMC11085009 DOI: 10.1177/17562848241251600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2024] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), comprising ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), is a costly condition in terms of morbidity and healthcare utilization, with an increasing prevalence now approaching 1% in the Western world. Endoscopic assessment of IBD remains the gold standard for diagnosis, evaluation of treatment response and determination of post-operative recurrence, but is expensive and invasive. Biomarkers can facilitate non-invasive disease assessment, with C-reactive protein and faecal calprotectin as the most widely available biomarkers in current clinical practice. This narrative review summarizes the evidence for their use in both UC and CD and offers practical guidance for healthcare providers taking into account the limitations of biomarker interpretation. We present evidence for the future use of novel biomarkers in IBD and discuss how biomarker discovery could deliver the goal of precision medicine in IBD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennie Clough
- St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Michael Colwill
- St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Andrew Poullis
- St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Richard Pollok
- St George’s University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
- Institute of Infection and Immunity, St George’s University, London, UK
| | - Kamal Patel
- St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Sailish Honap
- St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
- INFINY Institute, Nancy University Hospital, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
AbdelMeguid AMA, Whitehead E, Sebastian S. Modern practical management of acute severe colitis. Indian J Gastroenterol 2024; 43:78-92. [PMID: 38407787 DOI: 10.1007/s12664-024-01522-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2023] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is one of life-threatening complications that occur in one-fifth of ulcerative colitis (UC) patients with significant morbidity and an estimated mortality rate up to 1%. There are no validated clinical scoring systems for ASUC. Intravenous corticosteroids remain the cornerstone for the management of ASUC patients However, one-third of patients are steroid refractory and require colectomy in the pre-biologic era or salvage therapy in the post-biologic era. The currently available predictors of non-response to steroids and salvages therapy are sub-optimal. Furthermore, there is a need for the development of clear outcome measures for ASUC patients. Although infliximab and cyclosporin are both effective as salvage therapy, they still carry a rate of treatment failure. Hence, there is an unmet need to explore alternative therapeutic options before colectomy particularly in prior infliximab-exposed patients. This may include the introduction of small molecules with rapid onset of action as a salvage or sequential therapy and the use of slow-onset other biological therapy after "bridging" with cyclosporine. In this article, we explore the current best evidence-based practice and detail the gaps in knowledge in the management of ASUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Emma Whitehead
- IBD Unit, Hull University Teaching Hospitals, Hull, HU3 2JZ, UK
| | - Shaji Sebastian
- IBD Unit, Hull University Teaching Hospitals, Hull, HU3 2JZ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Quera R, Núñez P, Sicilia B, Flores L, Gomollón F. Corticosteroids in inflammatory bowel disease: Are they still a therapeutic option? GASTROENTEROLOGIA Y HEPATOLOGIA 2023; 46:716-726. [PMID: 36375697 DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2022.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2022] [Revised: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Despite the development and incorporation of new therapeutic strategies, such as biologic therapy and small molecules, corticosteroids still play an important role in inducting inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) remission. Variables like indicating the right doses at the right time, in adequate intervals, the security of these drugs and the pharmacological alternatives available must be considered by the providers when they are indicated to patients with IBD. Although the use of corticosteroids is considered as a marker of quality of care in patients with IBD, the use of these drugs in the clinical practice of IBD is far from being the correct one. This review article is not intended to be just a classic review of the indications for corticosteroids. Here we explain the scenarios in which, in our opinion, steroids would not be an appropriate option for our patients, as well as the most frequent mistakes we make in our daily practice when using them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodrigo Quera
- Programa Enfermedad Inflamatoria Intestinal, Centro de Enfermedades Digestivas, Universidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile
| | - Paulina Núñez
- Programa Enfermedad Inflamatoria Intestinal, Centro de Enfermedades Digestivas, Universidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile; Sección de Gastroenterología, Departamento de Medicina Interna, Hospital San Juan de Dios, Facultad Medicina Occidente, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Beatriz Sicilia
- Unidad de Enfermedad Inflamatoria Intestinal, Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario de Burgos, Burgos, España
| | - Lilian Flores
- Programa Enfermedad Inflamatoria Intestinal, Centro de Enfermedades Digestivas, Universidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile
| | - Fernando Gomollón
- Facultad de Medicina, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Aragón, CIBEREHD, Zaragoza, España.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Li Wai Suen CFD, Seah D, Choy MC, De Cruz P. Factors Associated With Response to Rescue Therapy in Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2023:izad183. [PMID: 37725044 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izad183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a medical emergency for which colectomy is required in patients who do not respond to rescue therapy. While previous studies have predominantly focused on predicting outcome to first-line corticosteroid therapy, there is a need to understand the factors associated with response to rescue therapies in order to improve clinical outcomes. We reviewed the evidence regarding factors associated with response to rescue therapy in adults with ASUC and identified future directions for research. METHODS A systematic search of the literature was conducted, and 2 reviewers independently assessed studies for inclusion. RESULTS Of 3509 records screened, 101 completed studies were eligible for inclusion. We identified 42 clinical, hematological, biochemical, endoscopic, or pharmacological factors associated with response to rescue therapy. Older age (≥50 years), thiopurine experience, and cytomegalovirus or Clostridioides difficile infection were associated with a higher risk of nonresponse to rescue therapy. Biochemical factors associated with poorer response included an elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥30mg/L on admission, hypoalbuminemia and an elevated ratio of CRP to albumin. Severe endoscopic findings, including a Mayo endoscopic score of 3 or Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity ≥5, portended poorer outcomes. The role of fecal calprotectin and therapeutic value of measuring infliximab drug levels in ASUC remain to be defined. CONCLUSIONS Response to rescue therapy can be predicted by several specific factors, which would aid clinical decision-making. Existing and emerging factors should be integrated within predictive and prognostic models to help improve clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher F D Li Wai Suen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medicine, Austin Academic Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Dean Seah
- Department of Gastroenterology, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Matthew C Choy
- Department of Gastroenterology, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medicine, Austin Academic Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Peter De Cruz
- Department of Gastroenterology, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medicine, Austin Academic Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hasselblatt P, Reindl W, Gauss A, Neeff H, Fusco S, Klaus J. Questions to consider when caring for patients with ulcerative colitis. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2023; 61:690-700. [PMID: 36257329 DOI: 10.1055/a-1890-6015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Although the management of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) is well defined by national and international guidelines, there are many debates and open questions related to daily care of UC patients. Here, we aimed to review topics with high clinical relevance including therapy algorithms, potential biomarkers for disease prognosis and response to therapy, the role of interventions targeting the gut microbiota, insights from head-to-head trials, novel UC medications, exit strategies, the impact of COVID19 on UC, care of patients with acute severe disease, cancer screening, and the role of surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Hasselblatt
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Reindl
- Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Annika Gauss
- University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hannes Neeff
- Dept. of General and Visceral Surgery, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Stefano Fusco
- Department of Gastroenterology, Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen Medizinische Fakultät, Tübingen, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rubio-Acosta F, Moctezuma-Velázquez P, Castro-Romero E, Uscanga-Domínguez L, Yamamoto-Furusho K, Moctezuma-Velázquez C. The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio as a predictor of steroid response in patients with severe ulcerative colitis: a retrospective cohort study. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS 2023; 115:197-199. [PMID: 35899688 DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.9006/2022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
In this study we assessed the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as a predictor of steroid non-response (SNR) in patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis and found a NLR on day 3 (NLR-3) >6.1 as a suitable cutoff point to identify SNR (OR 3.44, 95%CI 1.22-9.66) with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and AUROC of 66.75, 63.2%, 35.9%, 86%, and 0.650, respectively. A model including bowel movements, albumin levels, and a NLR-3>6.1 had an AUC of 0.812 to predict SNR, with acceptable calibration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernando Rubio-Acosta
- Internal Medicine, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición "Salvador Zubirán", Mexico
| | | | - Emma Castro-Romero
- Internal Medicine, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición "Salvador Zubirán"
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sleiman J, Bassi M, Tsipotis E, Charabaty A. Medical Treatment Options for Ulcerative Colitis. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2022; 35:428-436. [PMID: 36591395 PMCID: PMC9797279 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1758048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The landscape of management of ulcerative colitis, a type of inflammatory bowel disease, continues to change with advancement in pharmaceutical options as well as clinical treatment targets. Ulcerative colitis primarily involves the superficial layers of the large bowel, and cause active inflammation that can affect the colon from the rectum to the cecum in a relapsing and a remitting course. In this review, we provide evidence-based guidance on the selection of appropriate medical therapies based on individual patient and disease characteristics, with a focus on biologics and small molecules. We also review the role of surgery and management of acute severe ulcerative colitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Sleiman
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Mehak Bassi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Saint Peter's University Hospital, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Evangelos Tsipotis
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia
| | - Aline Charabaty
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland,Address for correspondence Aline Charabaty, MD Department of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Sibley Memorial Hospital5255 Loughboro Rd NW, Washington, DC, 20007
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Dulai PS, Rai V, Raffals LE, Lukin D, Hudesman D, Kochhar GS, Damas OM, Sauk JS, Levy AN, Sofia MA, Tuskey A, Deepak P, Yarur AJ, Afzali A, Ananthakrishnan AN, Cross RK, Hanauer SB, Siegel CA. Recommendations on the Appropriate Management of Steroids and Discharge Planning During and After Hospital Admission for Moderate-Severe Ulcerative Colitis: Results of a RAND Appropriateness Panel. Am J Gastroenterol 2022; 117:1288-1295. [PMID: 35416799 PMCID: PMC9437635 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2022] [Accepted: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Limited guidance exists for the postdischarge care of patients with ulcerative colitis hospitalized for moderate-severe flares. METHODS RAND methodology was used to establish appropriateness of inpatient and postdischarge steroid dosing, discharge criteria, follow-up, and postdischarge biologic or small molecule initiation. A literature review informed on the panel's voting, which occurred anonymously during 2 rounds before and after a moderated virtual session. RESULTS Methylprednisolone 40-60 mg intravenous every 24 hours or hydrocortisone 100 mg intravenous 3 times daily is appropriate for inpatient management, with methylprednisolone 40 mg being appropriate if intolerant of higher doses. It is appropriate to discharge patients once rectal bleeding has resolved (Mayo subscore 0-1) and/or stool frequency has returned to baseline frequency and form (Mayo subscore 0-1). It is appropriate to discharge patients on 40 mg of prednisone after observing patients for 24 hours in hospital to ensure stability before discharge. For patients being discharged on steroids without in-hospital biologic or small molecule therapy initiation, it is appropriate to start antitumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy after discharge for anti-TNF-naive patients. For anti-TNF-exposed patients, it is appropriate to start vedolizumab or ustekinumab for all patients and tofacitinib for those with a low risk of adverse events. It is appropriate to follow up patients clinically within 2 weeks and with lower endoscopy within 4-6 months after discharge. DISCUSSION We provide recommendations on the inpatient and postdischarge management of patients with ulcerative colitis hospitalized for moderate-severe flares.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Parambir S Dulai
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Victoria Rai
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Laura E Raffals
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Dana Lukin
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - David Hudesman
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, New York University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Gursimran S Kochhar
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Alleghany Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Oriana M Damas
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Jenny S Sauk
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Alexander N Levy
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - M Anthony Sofia
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Anne Tuskey
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Parakkal Deepak
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Andres J Yarur
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Wisconsin University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Anita Afzali
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Ashwin N Ananthakrishnan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Raymond K Cross
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Stephen B Hanauer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Corey A Siegel
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sasidharan S, Sasson AN, Shannon KM, Ananthakrishnan AN. Fecal Calprotectin Is a Predictor of Need for Rescue Therapy in Hospitalized Severe Colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2022; 28:1833-1837. [PMID: 35134899 PMCID: PMC9713501 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izac011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Up to one-third of patients hospitalized for acute severe colitis secondary to inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) do not adequately respond to intravenous steroids. There is an unmet need to identify a useful predictor for rescue treatment in this cohort of patients. AIMS The aim of this study was to assess the predictive efficacy of fecal calprotectin in identifying the need for medical or surgical therapy in patients with acute severe colitis. METHODS We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study including patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) who were hospitalized for severe exacerbation of colitis. The primary outcome was the need for in-hospital medical or surgical rescue therapy. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of rescue therapy. RESULTS Our study included 147 patients with UC. One-third (33%) required rescue therapy, and 13% underwent colectomy. Patients requiring rescue therapy had significantly higher fecal calprotectin (mean 1748 mcg/g vs 1353 mcg/g, P = .02) compared with those who did not. A fecal calprotectin >800 mcg/g independently predicted the need for inpatient medical rescue therapy (odds ratio, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.12-6.12). An admission calprotectin >800 mcg/g independently predicted surgery within 3 months (odds ratio, 2.88; 95% CI, 1.01-8.17). CONCLUSIONS Fecal calprotectin levels may serve as a useful noninvasive predictor of medical and surgical risk in individuals with UC presenting with acute severe colitis. This approach can facilitate earlier therapeutic interventions and improve outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saranya Sasidharan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Alexa N Sasson
- Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Kevin M Shannon
- Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Ashwin N Ananthakrishnan
- Address correspondence to: Ashwin N. Ananthakrishnan, MD, MPH, 165 Cambridge Street, 9th Floor, Boston, MA 02114 ()
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Role of Biomarkers in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Life (Basel) 2021; 11:life11121375. [PMID: 34947906 PMCID: PMC8707558 DOI: 10.3390/life11121375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2021] [Revised: 11/28/2021] [Accepted: 12/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The number of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is increasing worldwide. Endoscopy is the gold standard to assess the condition of IBD. The problem with this procedure is that the burden and cost on the patient are high. Therefore, the identification of a reliable biomarker to replace endoscopy is desired. Biomarkers are used in various situations such as diagnosis of IBD, evaluation of disease activity, prediction of therapeutic effect, and prediction of relapse. C-reactive protein and fecal calprotectin have a lot of evidence as objective biomarkers of disease activity in IBD. The usefulness of the fecal immunochemical test, serum leucine-rich glycoprotein, and urinary prostaglandin E major metabolite have also been reported. Herein, we comprehensively review the usefulness and limitations of biomarkers that can be used in daily clinical practice regarding IBD. To date, no biomarker is sufficiently accurate to replace endoscopy; however, it is important to understand the characteristics of each biomarker and use the appropriate biomarker at the right time in daily clinical practice.
Collapse
|
11
|
Holvoet T, Lobaton T, Hindryckx P. Optimal Management of Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis (ASUC): Challenges and Solutions. Clin Exp Gastroenterol 2021; 14:71-81. [PMID: 33727846 PMCID: PMC7955027 DOI: 10.2147/ceg.s197719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2020] [Accepted: 12/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Acute severe colitis is a severe complication of ulcerative colitis, affecting approximately 20% of patients. For physicians, it remains a challenging condition to treat. Current treatment algorithms have diminished the mortality associated with acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC), but colectomy rates remain high (approximately 30%) despite advances in therapy. Colectomy in ASUC is particularly associated with important postoperative complications and morbidity. In this review, reasons for the inability to improve care and avoid evolution to colectomy for ASUC are explored and solutions that might lead to a better management of the disease are investigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom Holvoet
- Department of Gastroenterology, AZ Nikolaas, Sint-Niklaas, Belgium.,Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Triana Lobaton
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Pieter Hindryckx
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Dragoni G, Innocenti T, Galli A. Biomarkers of Inflammation in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: How Long before Abandoning Single-Marker Approaches? Dig Dis 2020; 39:190-203. [PMID: 32942275 DOI: 10.1159/000511641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2020] [Accepted: 09/16/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronically relapsing disease with a continuous need for proactive monitoring to decide appropriate treatments and follow-up strategies. To date, gastrointestinal endoscopy with histologic examination of biopsies and contrast-enhanced imaging are mandatory techniques for the diagnosis and the activity assessment of IBD. SUMMARY In recent decades, many research efforts in the IBD field have been placed on finding non-invasive and reliable biomarkers of disease burden that can be easily tested in body fluids without impacting the quality of life of patients. Unfortunately, the ideal biomarker is yet to be discovered and recent studies have investigated the possibility to increase the accuracy of such measurements by combining different markers. In this review, we provide an update about the current knowledge on biomarkers of intestinal inflammation in IBD, focussing on disease diagnosis, correlation with endoscopic findings, and prediction of relapse. We also summarize composite scores of clinical and laboratory markers that have been recently proposed in various scenarios of disease activity. Key Messages: To date, only C-reactive protein and faecal calprotectin can be considered reliable markers of disease activity with demonstrated utility in IBD management. The combination of different parameters has recently shown higher accuracy and might substitute single-marker approaches in the future of research and clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriele Dragoni
- IBD Referral Center, Gastroenterology Department, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy, .,Gastroenterology Research Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biochemical Sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy, .,Department of Medical Biotechnologies, University of Siena, Siena, Italy,
| | - Tommaso Innocenti
- IBD Referral Center, Gastroenterology Department, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.,Gastroenterology Research Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biochemical Sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Andrea Galli
- Gastroenterology Research Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biochemical Sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Rivière P, Laharie D, Marteau P. Concise Commentary: Second Line Is Not Second Best-Continuing Validity of the Oxford Criteria in the Management of Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis. Dig Dis Sci 2020; 65:581-582. [PMID: 31489565 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-019-05788-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Pauline Rivière
- Department of Hepatogastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Haut-Lévêque Hospital, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - David Laharie
- Department of Hepatogastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Haut-Lévêque Hospital, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Philippe Marteau
- Sorbonne Université - INSERM-ERL 1157, CHU Saint-Antoine 27 - UMR7203 - Saint Antoine IBD Network, APHP, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Paris, France. .,Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Hôpital Saint Antoine, 184 Faubourg St Antoine, 75012, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Verdon C, Bessissow T, Lakatos PL. Management of Acute Severe Colitis in the Era of Biologicals and Small Molecules. J Clin Med 2019; 8:jcm8122169. [PMID: 31817972 PMCID: PMC6947608 DOI: 10.3390/jcm8122169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2019] [Revised: 12/02/2019] [Accepted: 12/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a medical emergency which occurs in about 20%–30% of patients with ulcerative colitis during their lifetime, and does carry a mortality risk of 1%. The management of inflammatory bowel diseases has evolved with changes in objective patient monitoring, as well as the availability of new treatment options with the development of new biological and small molecules; however, data is limited regarding their use in the context of ASUC. This review aims to discuss the emerging data regarding biologicals and small molecules therapies in the context of ASUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Verdon
- Division of Gastroenterology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H3G 1A4, Canada; (C.V.); (T.B.)
- Department of Gastroenterology, Campbelltown Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2560, Australia
| | - Talat Bessissow
- Division of Gastroenterology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H3G 1A4, Canada; (C.V.); (T.B.)
| | - Peter L. Lakatos
- Division of Gastroenterology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H3G 1A4, Canada; (C.V.); (T.B.)
- 1st Department of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest H1083, Hungary
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +514-934-1934 (ext. 45567)
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
Introduction: Despite the introduction of novel therapies and treatment strategies for ulcerative colitis (UC), many patients develop acute, severe episodes, warranting prompt care and aggressive management. There is a significant unmet need to improve outcomes in these patients. Clinicians must be able to identify those that will have worse prognosis and plan an aggressive therapy with an early/proactive adjustments in management if needed.Areas covered: The aim of this review is to evaluate the most recent evidence on the assessment and management of patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis. We searched the mainstream literature search engines for the most recent evidence on diagnosis and management of acute UC.Expert Opinion: The approach to patients with severe UC includes clinical and endoscopic assessment of disease severity and ruling out over-infections. While intravenous corticosteroids remain the first line therapy for acute severe colitis, many patients do not respond and require escalation to calcineurin inhibitors or infliximab, and may ultimately require colectomy. Even though several novel therapies are available or in development, their role in acute severe episodes of colitis is unknown.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rocío Sedano
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clínico de la Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Rodrigo Quera
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Program, Division of Gastroenterology, Clínica Las Condes, Santiago, Chile
| | - Daniela Simian
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Program, Division of Gastroenterology, Clínica Las Condes, Santiago, Chile
| | - Andres J Yarur
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|