Effects on survival of the adverse event of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab for hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter study by the Japan Red Cross Liver Study Group

Effect of Proteinuria Before Lenvatinib Administration on Treatment Response After Atezolizumab Bevacizumab Combination Therapy

Aim

We investigated the impact of proteinuria on the therapeutic effect before lenvatinib administration as second-line treatment after atezolizumab-bevacizumab.

Methods

We examined 64 patients who were administered lenvatinib as second-line treatment after discontinuation of atezolizumab and bevacizumab. Proteinuria assessed before lenvatinib administration was considered severe if the qualitative value test (QV) was 3+ or the urine protein/creatinine ratio (UPCR) was ≥ 2.0 (group A, n = 13) and non-severe if the UPCR was < 2.0 or the QV was ≤ 2+ (group B, n = 51).

Results

In the entire cohort, the modified albumin-bilirubin grades were grades 1, 2a, 2b, and 3 in 12, 21, 26, and 5 patients, respectively. Regarding the Barcelona Clinic of Liver Cancer stage, 2, 22, and 40 patients had stages A, B, and C, respectively. The objective response rate (ORR) was 14.0% and the disease control rate (DCR) was 59.3%. The median survival time and progression free survival after administration of lenvatinib was 14.8 (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.3-18.4) and 5.5 (95% CI, 3.6-7.5) months, respectively. The ORR and DCR were 0% and 38.4% for group A (n = 13) and 17.6% and 64.7% for group B (n = 51), respectively. The median time to treatment failure was 2.2 months in group A and 4.2 months in group B (p = 0.120).

Conclusions

Severe proteinuria before lenvatinib as a second-line therapy after atezolizumab-bevacizumab treatment may affect the duration of lenvatinib administration and treatment efficacy.

Heterogeneity in adverse events related to atezolizumab-bevacizumab for hepatocellular carcinoma reported in real-world studies

Background & Aims

Safety data for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with atezolizumab-bevacizumab in the real-world setting remain uncertain. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of adverse events (AEs) in patients with HCC treated with atezolizumab-bevacizumab in the literature.

Methods

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed for original studies reporting percentages of AEs in patients with HCC receiving atezolizumab-bevacizumab between 2020 to 2023, using the search terms "Atezolizumab/Bevacizumab", "HCC" and "Adverse events". We summarized the incidence of AEs and performed a meta-analysis in order to evaluate the incidence of AEs reported in the literature.

Results

A total of 30 studies (3,867 patients) were included. The analysis revealed heterogeneity in AE reporting, with arterial hypertension, proteinuria, and fatigue being the most frequently reported AEs whereas incidence of bleeding was reported in 66.7% of the studies and rare immune-related AEs were reported in 26.7% of the studies. The meta-analysis revealed pooled incidence rates of 79% for any grade AEs: 56% for grade 1/2 and 30% for grade ≥3. While the pooled rates of hypertension, anorexia, bleeding, pruritus, rash, and thyroid dysfunction were similar to those reported in the IMbrave150 trial, higher rates were observed in the literature for proteinuria, fatigue, ALT and AST elevations and gastrointestinal perforation. For grade ≥3 AEs, the percentages were consistent with the IMbrave150 trial, except for lower incidences of arterial hypertension and thrombosis in the literature. The exposure-adjusted incidence rates for proteinuria (55.7%), hypertension (45.3%) and fatigue (33.6%) were high. Heterogeneity was observed in the analysis of AEs across articles within the same cohorts of patients.

Conclusion

We observed a significant variability in AE reporting for atezolizumab-bevacizumab treatment in HCC in the literature, underscoring the need for standardized reporting practices.

Impact and implications

Considering the demonstrated safety of atezolizumab-bevacizumab in randomized-controlled trials, this meta-analysis offers valuable insights into reported occurrences of adverse events. Our study highlights significant heterogeneity among studies, underscoring the need to improve adverse event recording. Understanding the incidence and severity of treatment-related adverse events beyond clinical trials is essential for prompt intervention and may help in preventing treatment discontinuation and complications, potentially leading to better outcomes without significantly compromising quality of life due to adverse events.

Adverse Events in Targeted Therapy for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Predict Clinical Outcomes

To assess the impact of adverse event (AE) severity, caused by targeted therapy, on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a total of 183 patients with HCC treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (40), lenvatinib (57), sorafenib (79), cabozantinib (3), ramucirumab (3), and regorafenib (1) were included in this study. Age-, AFP-, and ALBI score-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of AE grades 1 to 3 versus grade 0 for OS and PFS were calculated using Cox proportional hazards models. The linear trend of the HRs was assessed by calculating the p values for this trend. The most common AEs were appetite loss (AE grade 0/1/2/3 = 97/23/55/12), general fatigue (102/31/44/6), hypertension (120/6/40/17), hand-foot syndrome (HFS) (135/21/24/3), proteinuria (140/13/16/14), and hypothyroidism (148/12/23/0). The adjusted HRs for OS of these AEs were 0.532-1.450-2.361 (p for trend 0.037), 1.057-1.691-3.364 (p for trend 0.004), 1.176-0.686-0.281 (p for trend 0.002), 0.639-0.759-1.820 (p for trend 0.462), 1.030-0.959-0.147 (p for trend 0.011), and 0.697-0.609 (p for trend 0.119), respectively. Those for PFS of the corresponding AEs were 0.592-1.073-2.811 (p for trend 0.255), 1.161-1.282-4.324 (p for trend 0.03), 0.965-0.781-0.655 (p for trend 0.095), 0.737-0.623-2.147 (p for trend 0.153), 1.061-0.832-0.800 (p for trend 0.391), and 1.412-0.560 (p for trend 0.081), respectively. Appetite loss and general fatigue negatively affected clinical outcomes, whereas hypertension, HFS, proteinuria, and hypothyroidism had positive effects.

Impact of immune-related adverse events in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Immune checkpoint inhibitors pose the risk of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Recent data suggest that irAEs may be associated with a favorable prognosis. This study aimed to investigate and analyze the association between these adverse events and the clinical benefits in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

METHODS

The study enrolled 130 patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab between November 2020 and January 2023 at a single center. The relationship between irAEs and both response rate and post-treatment outcomes was investigated.

RESULTS

Out of the 130 patients, irAEs developed in 36 (27.7%) patients. The irAE group exhibited a significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) than the non-irAE group, with a median PFS of 8.9 compared with 4.6 months (P < 0.01). No difference was found in the overall survival between the irAE and non-irAE groups. The irAE group demonstrated significantly higher disease control rate (DCR) than the non-irAE group (97.0% vs 65.5%, P < 0.01). The analysis by irAE severity revealed that the grade 1/2 group exhibited significantly longer PFS (7.9 vs 4.6 months, P = 0.007) and higher DCR (100% vs 65.5%, P < 0.01) than the non-irAE group. Furthermore, hypothyroidism correlated with a favorable PFS (8.9 vs 5.4 months, P = 0.02), DCR (100% vs 71.3%, P = 0.03), and overall response rate (58.3% vs 18.5%, P = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

The presence of irAEs is associated with prolonged PFS and higher DCR. Specifically, mild irAEs (grade 1/2) and hypothyroidism displayed prolonged PFS and higher DCR.

Predictive Value of Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count on the Efficacy of Treatment with Camrelizumab in Combination with Lenvatinib in Patients with Advanced Hepatitis B-Associated Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Objective: To examine the effects of peripheral blood eosinophil (EOS) count and its dynamic alterations on the treatment efficacy and prognosis of patients with advanced hepatitis B virus-associated hepatocellular carcinoma (HBV-HCC) receiving camrelizumab combined with lenvatinib (C + L) therapy. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 200 patients with advanced HBV-HCC who were admitted to two centers from January 2018 to August 2023 and treated with C + L. EOS, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were determined before C + L treatment (EOS0, NLR0, and PLR0) and after three cycles of treatment (EOS3, NLR3, and PLR3). The area under the curve was calculated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. NLR and PLR served as references to analyze the effect of differences in EOS in predicting the survival efficacy of patients with HBV-HCC treated using C + L. The independent risk factors affecting progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional risk models. Results: The ROC curve revealed that the predictive value of EOS3 was better than those of NLR3 and PLR3 for the long-term treatment efficacy of patients with intermediate and advanced HBV-HCC receiving C + L. Statistically significant differences were observed between groups with different levels of EOS0 and EOS3 and the evaluation of treatment efficacy after 3 weeks (P < 0.05). The median PFS of the high-EOS0 group was higher than that of the low-EOS0 group (P = 0.027); median PFS of the high EOS3 group was higher than that of the low EOS3 group (P = 0.018); median OS of the high EOS0 group was higher than that of the low EOS0 group (P = 0.032); median OS of the high EOS3 group was higher than that of the low EOS3 group (P < 0.0001). Multifactorial Cox analysis revealed that EOS3 was an independent predictor of PFS and that EOS0 was an independent predictor of OS (P < 0.05). Conclusion: EOS may be an ideal indicator for predicting the treatment efficacy and prognosis of patients with advanced HBV-HCC receiving C + L.

Biomarkers predicting the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in hepatocellular carcinoma

In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have emerged as a transformative approach in treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Despite their success, challenges persist, including concerns about their effectiveness, treatment costs, frequent occurrence of treatment-related adverse events, and tumor hyperprogression. Therefore, it is imperative to identify indicators capable of predicting the efficacy of ICIs treatment, enabling optimal patient selection to maximize clinical benefits while minimizing unnecessary toxic side effects and economic losses. This review paper categorizes prognostic biomarkers of ICIs treatment into the following categories: biochemical and cytological indicators, tumor-related markers, imaging and personal features, etiology, gut microbiome, and immune-related adverse events (irAEs). By organizing these indicators systematically, we aim to guide biomarker exploration and inform clinical treatment decisions.

Changing landscape of anti-angiogenic therapy: Novel approaches and clinical perspectives

Targeting angiogenesis has remained one of the important aspects in disease biology in general and cancer in particular. Currently (June 2023), over 593 clinical trials have been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov having inference of term 'angiogenesis'. A panel of 14 anti-angiogenic drugs have been approved by FDA for the treatment of variety of cancers and other human ailments. Although the anti-angiogenic therapy (AAT) has gained significant clinical attention as a promising approach in the treatment of various diseases, particularly cancer, however, sizable literature has accumulated in the recent past describing the aggressive nature of tumours after the drug holidays, evolving drug resistance and off-target toxicities. Nevertheless, the emergence of inscrutable compensatory or alternative angiogenic mechanisms is limiting the efficacy of anti-angiogenic drugs and focussing the therapeutic regime as a puzzle of 'Lernaean hydra'. This review offers an overview of recent updates on the efficacy of antiangiogenic therapy and the current clinical performance of aaRTK inhibitors. Additionally, it also explores the changing application landscape of AAT, focusing on its role in diabetic nephropathy, age-related macular degeneration and other neovascular ocular disorders. Combination therapy with antiangiogenic drugs and immune check point inhibitors (ICIs) has emerged as a potential strategy to enhance the therapeutic index of cancer immunotherapy. While clinical studies have demonstrated the clinical efficacy of this approach, they also highlight the complex and sometimes unpredictable adverse events associated with it. Normalizing tumour vasculature has been identified as a key factor in unlocking the full potential of ICIs, thereby providing hope for improved treatment outcomes. The future prospects and challenges of AAT have been described with special reference to integration of technological advances for enhancing its efficacy and applications beyond its discovery.

Predicting Outcomes of Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab Treatment in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma

A combination of atezolizumab with bevacizumab (AB) is the first regimen that has shown superiority compared to sorafenib and is now being used as the systemic treatment of choice for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with Barcelona Liver Cancer Clinic stage C. However, a considerable number of patients do not achieve survival or significant responses, indicating the need to identify predictive biomarkers for initial and on-treatment decisions in HCC patients receiving AB. In this manuscript, we summarized the current data from both experimental and clinical studies. This review will be beneficial for both clinicians and researchers in clinical practice as well as those designing experimental, translational, or clinical studies.