Collaborative Group of the Americas on Inherited Gastrointestinal Cancer Position statement on multigene panel testing for patients with colorectal cancer and/or polyposis

Selection of Germline Genetic Testing Panels in Patients With Cancer: ASCO Guideline

PURPOSE

To guide use of multigene panels for germline genetic testing for patients with cancer.

METHODS

An ASCO Expert Panel convened to develop recommendations on the basis of a systematic review of guidelines, consensus statements, and studies of germline and somatic genetic testing.

RESULTS

Fifty-two guidelines and consensus statements met eligibility criteria for the primary search; 14 studies were identified for Clinical Question 4.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Patients should have a family history taken and recorded that includes details of cancers in first- and second-degree relatives and the patient's ethnicity. When more than one gene is relevant based on personal and/or family history, multigene panel testing should be offered. When considering what genes to include in the panel, the minimal panel should include the more strongly recommended genes from Table 1 and may include those less strongly recommended. A broader panel may be ordered when the potential benefits are clearly identified, and the potential harms from uncertain results should be mitigated. Patients who meet criteria for germline genetic testing should be offered germline testing regardless of results from tumor testing. Patients who would not normally be offered germline genetic testing based on personal and/or family history criteria but who have a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant identified by tumor testing in a gene listed in Table 2 under the outlined circumstances should be offered germline testing.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/molecular-testing-and-biomarkers-guidelines.

Inherited BRCA1 and RNF43 pathogenic variants in a familial colorectal cancer type X family

Genetic susceptibility to familial colorectal cancer (CRC), including for individuals classified as Familial Colorectal Cancer Type X (FCCTX), remains poorly understood. We describe a multi-generation CRC-affected family segregating pathogenic variants in both BRCA1, a gene associated with breast and ovarian cancer and RNF43, a gene associated with Serrated Polyposis Syndrome (SPS). A single family out of 105 families meeting the criteria for FCCTX (Amsterdam I family history criteria with mismatch repair (MMR)-proficient CRCs) recruited to the Australasian Colorectal Cancer Family Registry (ACCFR; 1998-2008) that underwent whole exome sequencing (WES), was selected for further testing. CRC and polyp tissue from four carriers were molecularly characterized including a single CRC that underwent WES to determine tumor mutational signatures and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) events. Ten carriers of a germline pathogenic variant BRCA1:c.2681_2682delAA p.Lys894ThrfsTer8 and eight carriers of a germline pathogenic variant RNF43:c.988 C > T p.Arg330Ter were identified in this family. Seven members carried both variants, four of which developed CRC. A single carrier of the RNF43 variant met the 2019 World Health Organization (WHO2019) criteria for SPS, developing a BRAF p.V600 wildtype CRC. Loss of the wildtype allele for both BRCA1 and RNF43 variants was observed in three CRC tumors while a LOH event across chromosome 17q encompassing both genes was observed in a CRC. Tumor mutational signature analysis identified the homologous recombination deficiency (HRD)-associated COSMIC signatures SBS3 and ID6 in a CRC for a carrier of both variants. Our findings show digenic inheritance of pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and RNF43 segregating with CRC in a FCCTX family. LOH and evidence of BRCA1-associated HRD supports the importance of both these tumor suppressor genes in CRC tumorigenesis.

Comprehensive Analysis of Early-onset Colorectal Cancer: A Review

Early-onset colorectal cancer (CRC), which refers to CRC diagnosed in individuals below the age of 50 years, is a growing health concern that presents unique challenges in diagnosis, treatment, and long-term outcomes. Although approximately 70% of early-onset CRC cases are sporadic, with no apparent family history, approximately 25% have a familial component, and up to 20% may be associated with germline mutations, indicating a higher prevalence compared with the general population. Despite the progress in identifying the environmental, molecular, and genetic risk factors of early-onset CRC, the underlying causes for the global increase in its incidence remain unclear. This comprehensive review aims to provide a thorough analysis of early-onset CRC by examining the trends associated with its incidence, clinical and pathological characteristics, risk factors, molecular and genetic profiles, prognosis and screening strategies. By deepening our understanding of early-onset CRC, significant advances related to improving the outcomes and alleviating the burden of this disease on individuals, families, and healthcare systems can be achieved.

Ibero-American Consensus Review and Incorporation of New Biomarkers for Clinical Practice in Colorectal Cancer

Advances in genomic technologies have significantly improved the management of colorectal cancer (CRC). Several biomarkers have been identified in CRC that enable personalization in the use of biologic agents that have shown to enhance the clinical outcomes of patients. However, technologies used for their determination generate massive amounts of information that can be difficult for the clinician to interpret and use adequately. Through several discussion meetings, a group of oncology experts from Spain and several Latin American countries reviewed the latest literature to provide practical recommendations on the determination of biomarkers in CRC based on their clinical experience. The article also describes the importance of looking for additional prognostic biomarkers and the use of histopathology to establish an adequate molecular classification. Present and future of immunotherapy biomarkers in CRC patients are also discussed, together with several techniques for marker determination, including liquid biopsy, next-generation sequencing (NGS), polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and fecal immunohistochemical tests. Finally, the role of Molecular Tumor Boards in the diagnosis and treatment of CRC is described. All of this information will allow us to highlight the importance of biomarker determination in CRC.

Report from the 24th Annual Western Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference on Colorectal Cancer, Richmond, British Columbia, 28-29, October 2022

The 24th annual Western Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference (WCGCCC) was held in Richmond, British Columbia, on 28-29 October 2022. The WCGCCC is an interactive multidisciplinary conference attended by healthcare professionals from across Western Canada (British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba) who are involved in the care of patients with gastrointestinal cancer. Surgical, medical, and radiation oncologists; pathologists; radiologists; and allied health care professionals such as dieticians, nurses and a genetic counsellor participated in presentation and discussion sessions for the purpose of developing the recommendations presented here. This consensus statement addresses current issues in the management of colorectal cancer.

Upper Gastrointestinal Neoplasia and Worrisome Thyroid Nodules are Common in Colonic Polyposis of Unknown Etiology (CPUE)

BACKGROUND

Colonic polyposis of unknown etiology (CPUE) is defined as ≥10 cumulative colonic adenomas without a detectable germline pathogenic variant. Surveillance for patients with >100 adenomas is recommended, similar to patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. The utility of extra-colonic screening in patients with 10 to <100 adenomas is not well established.

METHODS

All CPUE patients seen at our center between 2003 and 2022 were included. Patients were categorized based on the range of cumulative colorectal adenoma count: 10 to 19, 20 to 99, and ≥100.

RESULTS

In all, 150 patients were identified of which 20(13.3%) had 10 to 19 cumulative adenomas, 79(52.7%) had 20 to 99 adenomas, and 51(34.0%) had ≥100 adenomas. Compared with patients with 10 to 19 and 20 to 99, patients with ≥100 adenomas were younger (mean 51 vs. 52 vs. 42 y, respectively). Of patients who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy, duodenal adenomas were found in 33.3%, 10.1%, and 38% in the 3 groups, respectively, P=0.002. Ampullary adenomas were significantly more common in the ≥100 adenoma group (14.8%, P=0.019) compared with 8.3% and 2.9% in the 10 to 19 and 20 to 99 groups, respectively. Thyroid nodules ≥1 cm were not detected in patients with 10 to 19 adenomas but were found in 23.3% and 14.3% of patients with 20 to 99 and ≥100 adenomas, respectively (P=0.254).

CONCLUSION

In our cohort, duodenal and gastric adenomas occurred in CPUE patients with adenoma count 10 to ≥100 at a relatively high proportion. We recommend a baseline esophagogastroduodenoscopy in all patients with CPUE. While clinically significant thyroid nodules were not detected in patients with 10 to 19 adenomas, they occurred in about one-fifth of the patients with ≥20 adenomas, indicating that thyroid ultrasound is prudent.

Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer: Current Insights

Over the past decade, the incidence of colorectal cancer has increased in individuals under the age of 50 years. Meanwhile, the incidence has gradually decreased in the older population. As described herein, we reviewed the available literature to summarize the current landscape of early-onset colorectal cancer, including risk factors, clinicopathological presentation, genetic makeup of patients, and management. Currently, early-onset colorectal cancer is treated similarly as late-onset colorectal cancer, yet the available literature shows that early-onset colorectal cancer is more aggressive and different, and this remains a significant unmet need. A detailed understanding of early-onset colorectal cancer is needed to identify risk factors for the increased incidence and tailor treatments accordingly.

AXIN2 germline testing in a French cohort validates pathogenic variants as a rare cause of predisposition to colorectal polyposis and cancer

Only a few patients with germline AXIN2 variants and colorectal adenomatous polyposis or cancer have been described, raising questions about the actual contribution of this gene to colorectal cancer (CRC) susceptibility. To assess the clinical relevance for AXIN2 testing in patients suspected of genetic predisposition to CRC, we collected clinical and molecular data from the French Oncogenetics laboratories analyzing AXIN2 in this context. Between 2004 and June 2020, 10 different pathogenic/likely pathogenic AXIN2 variants were identified in 11 unrelated individuals. Eight variants were from a consecutive series of 3322 patients, which represents a frequency of 0.24%. However, loss-of-function AXIN2 variants were strongly associated with genetic predisposition to CRC as compared with controls (odds ratio: 11.89, 95% confidence interval: 5.103-28.93). Most of the variants were predicted to produce an AXIN2 protein devoid of the SMAD3-binding and DIX domains, but preserving the β-catenin-binding domain. Ninety-one percent of the AXIN2 variant carriers who underwent colonoscopy had adenomatous polyposis. Forty percent of the variant carriers developed colorectal or/and other digestive cancer. Multiple tooth agenesis was present in at least 60% of them. Our report provides further evidence for a role of AXIN2 in CRC susceptibility, arguing for AXIN2 testing in patients with colorectal adenomatous polyposis or cancer.

Germline Cancer Risk Profiles of Patients With Young-Onset Colorectal Cancer: Findings From a Prospective Universal Germline Testing and Telegenetics Program

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer is being increasingly diagnosed in people younger than 50 years. An inheritable cancer predisposition has been reported in 22% of the young-onset cases. Assessment of germline risk is critical for personalized cancer care.

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to implement universal germline cancer risk assessment and testing and to define the germline cancer risk profiles of patients presenting with young-onset disease.

DESIGN

This is a prospective cohort study.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted at a tertiary-referral academic medical center.

PATIENTS

This study included newly diagnosed patients presenting to surgical clinics between September 2019 and February 2021 who were treated on a standardized care pathway including the universal germline risk assessment.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients received educational material on young-onset disease, genetic testing, and insurance coverage followed by genetic counseling (either remotely by telegenetics or in person). Consenting patients were assessed on a 47-gene common hereditary cancer panel.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was a proportion of patients with identifiable germline cancer predisposition.

RESULTS

Among 500 patients with colorectal cancer, 185 (37%) were 50 years of age or younger (median: 44). A family history was absent for the majority of patients (123; 67%), and in 15 patients, tumors (8.1%) were deficient in DNA mismatch repair. Germline testing was completed in 130 patients (70%); the remainder were pending (7%), deceased (1%), or declined (22%). Pathogenic germline mutations were identified in 25 of 130 (19%) patients: 12 in mismatch repair genes and 13 in other genes. A variant of uncertain significance was found in 23 (18%) patients. Importantly, a pathogenic germline mutation was identified in 12% of the patients without a family history (versus 32% with; p = 0.015) and in 13% of those with proficient mismatch repair colorectal cancers (versus 71% if deficient; p < 0.001).

LIMITATIONS

The study is limited by its implementation at a single tertiary academic institution.

CONCLUSIONS

One in 5 patients with young-onset disease harbored germline cancer predisposition. This detection rate, coupled with a high level of interest and acceptance from patients and feasibility of implementation, supports universal germline cancer risk assessment in this patient population. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B925 .

PERFILES DE RIESGO DE CNCER DE LNEA GERMINAL DE PACIENTES CON CNCER COLORRECTAL DE INICIO JOVEN HALLAZGOS DE UN PROGRAMA UNIVERSAL PROSPECTIVO DE PRUEBAS DE LNEA GERMINAL Y TELEGENTICA

ANTECEDENTES:El cáncer colorrectal se diagnostica cada vez más en personas menores de 50 años. Se ha informado una predisposición hereditaria al cáncer en el 22 % de los casos de aparición temprana. La evaluación del riesgo de la línea germinal es fundamental para la atención personalizada del cáncer.OBJETIVO:Implementar la evaluación y las pruebas universales de riesgo de cáncer de línea germinal, y definir los perfiles de riesgo de cáncer de línea germinal de los pacientes que presentan una enfermedad de aparición temprana.DISEÑO:Un estudio de cohorte prospectivo.AJUSTE:Un centro médico académico de referencia terciaria.PACIENTES:Los pacientes recién diagnosticados que se presentaron en clínicas quirúrgicas entre Septiembre de 2019 y Febrero de 2021 fueron tratados en una vía de atención estandarizada que incluye una evaluación de riesgo de línea germinal universal.INTERVENCIÓN:Los pacientes recibieron material educativo sobre enfermedades de aparición temprana, pruebas genéticas y cobertura de seguro, seguido de asesoramiento genético (ya sea a distancia por telegenética o en persona). Los pacientes que dieron su consentimiento fueron evaluados en un panel de cánceres hereditarios comunes de 47 genes.MEDIDA DE RESULTADO PRINCIPAL:Proporción de pacientes con predisposición identificable al cáncer de línea germinal.RESULTADOS:Entre 500 pacientes con cáncer colorrectal, 185 (37%) tenían 50 años o menos (mediana: 44). No había antecedentes familiares en la mayoría (123, 67%) y 15 tumores (8,1%) eran deficientes en la reparación del desajuste de ácido desoxirribonucleico. La prueba de línea germinal se completó en 130 pacientes (70%); el resto estaban pendientes (7%), fallecidos (1%) o declinados (22%). Se identificaron mutaciones patogénicas de la línea germinal en 25 (de 130, 19%) pacientes: 12 en genes de reparación de errores de emparejamiento y 13 en otros genes. Se encontró una variante de significado incierto en 23 (18%) pacientes. Es importante señalar que se identificó una mutación germinal patogénica en el 12% de los pacientes sin antecedentes familiares (frente al 32% con; p = 0,015) y en el 13% de aquellos con cánceres colorrectales competentes en la reparación de errores de emparejamiento (frente al 71% si eran deficientes; p < 0,001).LIMITACIÓN:Implementado en una sola institución académica terciaria.CONCLUSIÓN:Uno de cada cinco pacientes con enfermedad de inicio joven albergaba predisposición al cáncer de línea germinal. Esta tasa de detección, junto con un alto nivel de interés y aceptación por parte de los pacientes y la viabilidad de la implementación, respaldan la evaluación universal del riesgo de cáncer de línea germinal en esta población de pacientes. Consulte el Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B925 . (Traducción-Dr. Yesenia Rojas-Khalil ).

Occurrence of gastric cancer in patients with juvenile polyposis syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The true rate of gastric cancer (GC) in juvenile polyposis syndrome (JPS) is unknown because of its rarity and ascertainment bias in published literature. To better assess this, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched for the key words juvenile polyposis syndrome, juvenile polyps, stomach cancer, GC, SMAD4, BMPR1A, hamartomatous polyposis syndrome, hamartomas, and hereditary cancers for studies reporting upper GI manifestations in JPS. The primary outcome was the reported occurrence of GC in JPS. We then compared GC occurrence based on the presence or absence of pathogenic germline variants (PGVs) and in untested patients.

RESULTS

Eleven studies including 637 patients were included. The pooled occurrence of GC was 3.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8-5.2; I² = 12.3%) at a median age of 42.5 years (range, 15-57.6). The pooled occurrence of GC in patients with SMAD4 PGV was 10.1% (95% CI, 3.2-16.8%; I² = 54.7%). GC was reported in only 1 BMPR1A PGV carrier and was not reported in patients without an identifiable PGV. In patients with prior germline testing, the risk of GC was higher in SMAD4 PGV carriers (odds ratio, 11.6; 95% CI, 4.6-29.4; I² = 18.3%) compared with patients without SMAD4 PGV. In JPS patients with unknown status of germline testing, pooled occurrence of GC was 7.5% (95% CI, 0-15.5). There was an overall moderate risk of bias in the studies.

CONCLUSIONS

GC is highest in SMAD4-associated JPS and was not reported in patients without identifiable PGVs. The value of GC surveillance in BMPR1A PGV carriers and JPS patients without an identifiable PGV is questionable. Germline testing should be performed in all JPS patients to inform GC risk discussion and utility of surveillance.

Clinical Spectrum and Science Behind the Hamartomatous Polyposis Syndromes

The hamartomatous polyposis syndromes are a set of clinically distinct disorders characterized by the occurrence of hamartomatous polyps in the gastrointestinal tract. These syndromes include juvenile polyposis syndrome, Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, and PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome. Although each of the syndromes has distinct phenotypes, the hamartomatous polyps can be challenging to differentiate histologically. Additionally, each of these syndromes is associated with increased lifetime risks of gene-specific and organ-specific cancers, including those outside of the gastrointestinal tract. Germline pathogenic variants can be identified in a subset of individuals with these syndromes, which facilitates molecular diagnosis and subsequent gene-enabled management in the setting of genetic counseling. Although the malignant potential of hamartomatous polyps remains elusive, timely recognition of these syndromes is important and enables presymptomatic cancer surveillance and management before symptom exacerbation. Presently, there are no standard agents to prevent the development of polyps and cancers in the hamartomatous polyposis syndromes.

Clinical features and long-term outcomes of patients with colonic oligopolyposis of unknown etiology

BACKGROUND

Colonic adenomatous polyposis of unknown etiology (CPUE) is an adenomatous polyposis phenotype that resembles Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP) even though no germline pathogenic variant is identified.

AIM

We sought to better characterize the clinical features and outcomes in a cohort of CPUE patients.

METHODS

This is a retrospective case series of patients 18 years old or older with aden-omatous oligopolyposis (between 10-100 adenomas) and negative genetic testing, identified through the Hereditary Gastrointestinal Cancer Database at Massachusetts General Hospital, a tertiary academic referral center. A retrospective chart review was performed with a focus on demographics, alcohol and tobacco use, medication use, familial malignancy and polyp burden, genetic testing information, endoscopic surveillance data including the corresponding histopathology, colonic and extracolonic malignancies, mortality events, and their etiology. Spearman correlation and Pearson Chi-square test (or Fisher's exact test) were used for continuous and categorical variables respectively.

RESULTS

CPUE patients were primarily male (69%) and presented for genetic counseling at 63.7 years. Only 2 patients (2.9%) reported a first-degree relative with polyposis. During an average surveillance period of 12.3 years, 0.5 colonoscopies per year were performed. Patients developed 2.3 new adenomas per year. 4 (5.7%) were diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC) at a mean age of 66 years, and 3 were diagnosed prior to the onset of oligopolyposis. 7 (10%) required colectomy due to advanced dysplasia or polyp burden. With respect to upper gastrointestinal manifestations, 1 patient had a gastric adenoma, but there were no cases of gastric or small bowel polyposis. During surveillance, 10 (14%) patients died at a mean age of 72, and none were due to CRC.

CONCLUSION

CPUE is distinct from familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) syndrome and the use of FAP surveillance guidelines may result in unnecessarily frequent upper and lower endoscopies.

Multiple colorectal adenomas in Lynch syndrome

Background

Lynch syndrome has not traditionally been considered to have a high colorectal adenoma burden. However, with increasing adenoma detection rates in the general population, the incidence of adenoma detection in Lynch syndrome may also be increasing and leading to higher cumulative adenoma counts.

Aim

To clarify the prevalence and clinical impact of multiple colorectal adenomas (MCRA) in Lynch syndrome.

Methods

A retrospective review of patients with Lynch syndrome at our institution was performed to assess for MCRA (defined as ≥10 cumulative adenomas).

Results

There were 222 patients with Lynch syndrome among whom 14 (6.3%) met MCRA criteria. These patients had increased incidence of advanced neoplasia (OR 10, 95% CI: 2.7-66.7).

Conclusions

MCRA is not unusual in Lynch syndrome and is associated with a significantly increased likelihood of advanced colon neoplasia. Consideration should be given to differentiating colonoscopy intervals based on the presence of polyposis in Lynch syndrome.

Multigene Panel Testing Yields High Rates of Clinically Actionable Variants Among Patients With Colorectal Cancer

PURPOSE

Whether germline multigene panel testing (MGPT) should be performed in all individuals with colorectal cancer (CRC) remains uncertain. Therefore, we aimed to determine the yield and potential clinical impact of MGPT across a large, diverse CRC cohort.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of adults with CRC who underwent MGPT of > 10 genes at a commercial laboratory between March 2015 and May 2021. All data were prospectively collected through a single commercial laboratory and retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 34,244 individuals with a history of CRC underwent germline MPGT and were included in the analysis. This cohort was predominantly female (60.7%), White (70.6%), and age 50 years or older (68.9%), with 35.5% also reporting a noncolorectal malignancy. At least one pathogenic/likely pathogenic germline variant (PGV) was found in 4,864 (14.2%), with 3,111 (9.1%) having a PGV associated with increased CRC/polyposis risk and 1,048 (3.1%) having an otherwise clinically actionable PGV. Larger gene panels were not clearly associated with higher yield of clinically actionable PGVs. PGVs were more prevalent in individuals of Ashkenazi Jewish descent (P < .001) and Hispanic ethnicity (P < .001). Across all ages, panel sizes, and races/ethnicities, the rate of clinically actionable PGVs on MGPT was 7.9% or greater. A variant of uncertain significance was identified in 13,094 individuals (38.2%). Identification of a variant of uncertain significance associated with panel size (P < .001) and was lower in individuals of Ashkenazi Jewish descent (P < .001), but higher in Black, Asian, and Hispanic individuals (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the largest study to date examining MGPT in CRC, demonstrating high rates of clinically actionable variants detected across all age groups, panel sizes, and racial/ethnic groups. This work supports consideration of broadening germline genetic testing criteria for individuals with CRC.

Diagnosis and Management of Cancer Risk in the Gastrointestinal Hamartomatous Polyposis Syndromes: Recommendations From the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer

The gastrointestinal hamartomatous polyposis syndromes are rare, autosomal dominant disorders associated with an increased risk of benign and malignant intestinal and extraintestinal tumors. They include Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, juvenile polyposis syndrome, the PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome (including Cowden's syndrome and Bannayan-Riley-Ruvalcaba syndrome), and hereditary mixed polyposis syndrome. Diagnoses are based on clinical criteria and, in some cases, confirmed by demonstrating the presence of a germline pathogenic variant. The best understood hamartomatous polyposis syndrome is Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, caused by germline pathogenic variants in the STK11 gene. The management is focused on prevention of bleeding and mechanical obstruction of the small bowel by polyps and surveillance of organs at increased risk for cancer. Juvenile polyposis syndrome is caused by a germline pathogenic variant in either the SMAD4 or BMPR1A genes, with differing clinical courses. Patients with SMAD4 pathogenic variants may have massive gastric polyposis, which can result in gastrointestinal bleeding and/or protein-losing gastropathy. Patients with SMAD4 mutations usually have the simultaneous occurrence of hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (juvenile polyposis syndrome-hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia overlap syndrome) that can result in epistaxis, gastrointestinal bleeding from mucocutaneous telangiectasias, and arteriovenous malformations. Germline pathogenic variants in the PTEN gene cause overlapping clinical phenotypes (known as the PTEN hamartoma tumor syndromes), including Cowden's syndrome and related disorders that are associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal and colonic polyposis, colon cancer, and other extraintestinal manifestations and cancers. Due to the relative rarity of the hamartomatous polyposis syndromes, recommendations for management are based on few studies. This U.S Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer consensus statement summarizes the clinical features, assesses the current literature, and provides guidance for diagnosis, assessment, and management of patients with the hamartomatous polyposis syndromes, with a focus on endoscopic management.

Diagnosis and management of cancer risk in the gastrointestinal hamartomatous polyposis syndromes: recommendations from the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer

The gastrointestinal hamartomatous polyposis syndromes are rare, autosomal dominant disorders associated with an increased risk of benign and malignant intestinal and extraintestinal tumors. They include Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, juvenile polyposis syndrome, the PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome (including Cowden's syndrome and Bannayan-Riley-Ruvalcaba syndrome), and hereditary mixed polyposis syndrome. Diagnoses are based on clinical criteria and, in some cases, confirmed by demonstrating the presence of a germline pathogenic variant. The best understood hamartomatous polyposis syndrome is Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, caused by germline pathogenic variants in the STK11 gene. The management is focused on prevention of bleeding and mechanical obstruction of the small bowel by polyps and surveillance of organs at increased risk for cancer. Juvenile polyposis syndrome is caused by a germline pathogenic variant in either the SMAD4 or BMPR1A genes, with differing clinical courses. Patients with SMAD4 pathogenic variants may have massive gastric polyposis, which can result in gastrointestinal bleeding and/or protein-losing gastropathy. Patients with SMAD4 mutations usually have the simultaneous occurrence of hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (juvenile polyposis syndrome-hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia overlap syndrome) that can result in epistaxis, gastrointestinal bleeding from mucocutaneous telangiectasias, and arteriovenous malformations. Germline pathogenic variants in the PTEN gene cause overlapping clinical phenotypes (known as the PTEN hamartoma tumor syndromes), including Cowden's syndrome and related disorders that are associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal and colonic polyposis, colon cancer, and other extraintestinal manifestations and cancers. Due to the relative rarity of the hamartomatous polyposis syndromes, recommendations for management are based on few studies. This U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer consensus statement summarizes the clinical features, assesses the current literature, and provides guidance for diagnosis, assessment, and management of patients with the hamartomatous polyposis syndromes, with a focus on endoscopic management.

Diagnosis and Management of Cancer Risk in the Gastrointestinal Hamartomatous Polyposis Syndromes: Recommendations From the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer

The gastrointestinal hamartomatous polyposis syndromes are rare, autosomal dominant disorders associated with an increased risk of benign and malignant intestinal and extraintestinal tumors. They include Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, juvenile polyposis syndrome, the PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome (including Cowden's syndrome and Bannayan-Riley-Ruvalcaba syndrome), and hereditary mixed polyposis syndrome. Diagnoses are based on clinical criteria and, in some cases, confirmed by demonstrating the presence of a germline pathogenic variant. The best understood hamartomatous polyposis syndrome is Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, caused by germline pathogenic variants in the STK11 gene. The management is focused on prevention of bleeding and mechanical obstruction of the small bowel by polyps and surveillance of organs at increased risk for cancer. Juvenile polyposis syndrome is caused by a germline pathogenic variant in either the SMAD4 or BMPR1A genes, with differing clinical courses. Patients with SMAD4 pathogenic variants may have massive gastric polyposis, which can result in gastrointestinal bleeding and/or protein-losing gastropathy. Patients with SMAD4 mutations usually have the simultaneous occurrence of hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (juvenile polyposis syndrome-hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia overlap syndrome) that can result in epistaxis, gastrointestinal bleeding from mucocutaneous telangiectasias, and arteriovenous malformations. Germline pathogenic variants in the PTEN gene cause overlapping clinical phenotypes (known as the PTEN hamartoma tumor syndromes), including Cowden's syndrome and related disorders that are associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal and colonic polyposis, colon cancer, and other extraintestinal manifestations and cancers. Due to the relative rarity of the hamartomatous polyposis syndromes, recommendations for management are based on few studies. This US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer consensus statement summarizes the clinical features, assesses the current literature, and provides guidance for diagnosis, assessment, and management of patients with the hamartomatous polyposis syndromes, with a focus on endoscopic management.

Yield of upper gastrointestinal screening in colonic adenomatous polyposis of unknown etiology: a multicenter study

Background and study aims  The majority of patients with 10 or more cumulative colorectal adenomas have uninformative genetic testing and meet criteria for colonic adenomatous polyposis of unknown etiology (CPUE). The yield of upper gastrointestinal screening in patients with CPUE after multi-gene panel testing is unknown and our objective was to characterize this. Patient and methods  A multicenter, retrospective analysis of screening upper endoscopies in adults with CPUE after multi-gene panel testing was performed. Those with a history of gastroduodenal neoplasia prior to CPUE diagnosis were excluded. Demographic and clinical variables were collected and compared. Results  One hundred and twenty-eight patients with CPUE were included from five participating centers. Nine (7.0 %) had gastroduodenal neoplasia on initial screening upper endoscopy. Those with over 100 colorectal adenomas had a significantly higher rate of gastroduodenal neoplasia than those with 20-99 or 10-19 colorectal adenomas (44.4 % vs 4.1 % vs 4.4 %, P  = 0.002). Similar results were seen when the analysis was restricted to only duodenal or ampullary adenomas. The only malignancy was a gastric cancer in a patient with 20 to 99 colorectal adenomas. When comparing patients with gastroduodenal neoplasia to those without, the only significantly different characteristic was the cumulative number of colorectal adenomas. Conclusions  We found a 7 % rate of gastroduodenal neoplasia in patients with CPUE after multi-gene panel testing. Although patients with ≥ 100 colorectal adenomas had a significantly higher risk, over 4 % of patients with 10 to 99 colorectal adenomas had gastroduodenal neoplasia. Given this, we recommend a screening upper endoscopy at the time of a colonoscopy after CPUE diagnosis.

Fanconi Anemia Pathway in Colorectal Cancer: A Novel Opportunity for Diagnosis, Prognosis and Therapy

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly diagnosed malignancy and has the second highest mortality rate globally. Thanks to the advent of next-generation sequencing technologies, several novel candidate genes have been proposed for CRC susceptibility. Germline biallelic mutations in one or more of the 22 currently recognized Fanconi anemia (FA) genes have been associated with Fanconi anemia disease, while germline monoallelic mutations, somatic mutations, or the promoter hypermethylation of some FANC genes increases the risk of cancer development, including CRC. The FA pathway is a substantial part of the DNA damage response system that participates in the repair of DNA inter-strand crosslinks through homologous recombination (HR) and protects genome stability via replication fork stabilization, respectively. Recent studies revealed associations between FA gene/protein tumor expression levels (i.e., FANC genes) and CRC progression and drug resistance. Moreover, the FA pathway represents a potential target in the CRC treatment. In fact, FANC gene characteristics may contribute to chemosensitize tumor cells to DNA crosslinking agents such as oxaliplatin and cisplatin besides exploiting the synthetic lethal approach for selective targeting of tumor cells. Hence, this review summarizes the current knowledge on the function of the FA pathway in DNA repair and genomic integrity with a focus on the FANC genes as potential predisposition factors to CRC. We then introduce recent literature that highlights the importance of FANC genes in CRC as promising prognostic and predictive biomarkers for disease management and treatment. Finally, we represent a brief overview of the current knowledge around the FANC genes as synthetic lethal therapeutic targets for precision cancer medicine.

Evaluation of Classic, Attenuated, and Oligopolyposis of the Colon

The goal of this review is to provide an overview of evaluating patients with adenomatous polyposis of the colon, including elements such as generating a differential diagnosis, referral considerations for genetic testing, genetic testing options, and expected outcomes from genetic testing in these individuals. In more recent years, adenomatous colonic polyposis has evolved beyond the more robustly characterized familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and MUTYH-associated polyposis (MAP) now encompassing more newly described genes and associated syndromes. Technological innovation, from whole-exome sequencing to multigene panel testing, has dramatically increased the amount of genotypic and phenotypic data amassed in adenomatous polyposis cohorts, which has contributed greatly to informing diagnosis and clinical management of affected individuals and their families.

How many is too many? Polyposis syndromes and what to do next

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The goal of this review is to help providers recognize, diagnose and manage gastrointestinal (GI) polyposis syndromes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Intestinal polyps include a number of histological sub-types such as adenomas, serrated, hamartomas among others. Over a quarter of individuals undergoing screening colonoscopy are expected to have colonic adenomas. Although it is not uncommon for adults to have a few GI polyps in their lifetime, some individuals are found to have multiple polyps of varying histology throughout the GI tract. In these individuals, depending on polyp histology, number, location and size as well as extra-intestinal features and/or family history, a polyposis syndrome should be considered with appropriate testing and management.

SUMMARY

Diagnosis and management of polyposis syndromes has evolved with advent of multigene panel testing and new data on optimal surveillance strategies. Evidence-based recommendations and current practice guidelines for polyposis syndromes are reviewed here. Areas of uncertainty and future research are also highlighted.

Multi-Gene Panel Testing in Gastroenterology: Are We Ready for the Results?

Genetic testing aims to identify patients at risk for inherited cancer susceptibility. In the last decade, there was a significant increase in the request of broader panels of genes as multi-gene panel testing became widely available. However, physicians may be faced with genetic findings for which there is lack of management evidence, despite some progress in understanding their clinical relevance. In this short review, we discuss the advantages and the drawbacks related to multi-gene panel testing in the setting of a Gastrointestinal Familial Cancer Risk clinic. We also summarize the available recommendations on management of pathogenic variant carriers.

Survey of germline variants in cancer-associated genes in young adults with colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence in young adults is rising. Identifying genetic risk factors is fundamental for the clinical management of patients and their families. This study aimed to identify clinically significant germline variants among young adults with CRC. Whole-exome sequencing data of blood-derived DNA from 133 unrelated young CRC patients (<55 years of age) underwent a comprehensive analysis of 133 cancer-predisposition/implicated genes. All patient tumors were evaluated for mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR). Among 133 patients (aged 16-54 years), 15% (20/133) had clinically actionable pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants in at least 1 well established cancer-predisposing gene: dMMR genes (6), MUTYH [bi-allelic (2), mono-allelic (3)], RNF43 (1), BMPR1A (1), BRCA2 (4), ATM (1), RAD51C (1), and BRIP1 (1). Five patients (4%) had variants in genes implicated in cancer but where the significance of germline variants in CRC risk is uncertain: GATA2 (1), ERCC2 (mono-allelic) (1), ERCC4 (mono-allelic) (1), CFTR (2). Fourteen (11%) had dMMR tumors. Eighteen (14%) reported a first-degree relative with CRC, but only three of these carried P/LP variants. Three patients with variants in polyposis-associated genes showed no polyposis (one each in MUTYH [bi-allelic], RNF43, and BMPR1A). Approximately one in five young adults in our series carried at least one P/LP variant in a cancer-predisposing/implicated gene; 80% of these variants are currently considered clinically actionable in a familial cancer setting. Family history and phenotype have limitations for genetic risk prediction; therefore multigene panel testing and genetic counseling are warranted for all young adults with CRC regardless of those two factors.

From APC to the genetics of hereditary and familial colon cancer syndromes

Hereditary colorectal cancer (CRC) syndromes attributable to high penetrance mutations represent 9-26% of young-onset CRC cases. The clinical significance of many of these mutations is understood well enough to be used in diagnostics and as an aid in patient care. However, despite the advances made in the field, a significant proportion of familial and early-onset cases remains molecularly uncharacterized and extensive work is still needed to fully understand the genetic nature of CRC susceptibility. With the emergence of next-generation sequencing and associated methods, several predisposition loci have been unraveled, but validation is incomplete. Individuals with cancer-predisposing mutations are currently enrolled in life-long surveillance, but with the development of new treatments, such as cancer vaccinations, this might change in the not so distant future for at least some individuals. For individuals without a known cause for their disease susceptibility, prevention and therapy options are less precise. Herein, we review the progress achieved in the last three decades with a focus on how CRC predisposition genes were discovered. Furthermore, we discuss the clinical implications of these discoveries and anticipate what to expect in the next decade.

Outcomes of retesting in patients with previously uninformative cancer genetics evaluations

Advances in cancer genetics have increased germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant (PV/LPV) detection rates. More data is needed to inform which patients with previously uninformative results could benefit most from retesting, especially beyond breast/ovarian cancer populations. Here, we describe retesting outcomes and predictors of PV/LPVs in a cohort of patients unselected by cancer diagnosis. Retrospective chart reviews were conducted for patients at a cancer genetics clinic between 1998 and 2019 who underwent genetic testing (GT) on ≥ 2 dates with ≥ 1 year between tests, with no PV/LPVs on first-line GT. Demographics, retesting indications, and GT details were reviewed to evaluate predictive factors of PV/LPV identification. 139 patients underwent retesting, of whom 24 (17.3%) had a PV/LPV, encompassing 15 genes. 14 PV/LPV carriers (58.3%) only returned for retesting after personal or familial history changes (typically new cancer diagnoses), while 10 (41.7%) retested due to updated GT availability. No specific GT method was most likely to identify PV/LPVs and no specific clinical factors were predictive of a PV/LPV. The identified PV/LPVs were consistent with patients' personal or family histories, but were discordant with the initial referral indication for GT. For 16 (66.7%) PV/LPV carriers, the genetic diagnosis changed clinical management. This study adds to the limited body of literature on retesting outcomes beyond first-line BRCA analysis alone and confirms the utility of multigene panel testing. Retesting certain affected individuals when updated GT is available could result in earlier PV/LPV identification, significantly impacting screening recommendations and potentially reducing cancer-related morbidity and mortality.

RNF43 pathogenic Germline variant in a family with colorectal cancer

The role of RNF43 as a cause of an inherited predisposition to colorectal cancer (CRC) is yet to be fully explored. This report presents our findings of two individuals with CRC from a single family carrying a likely-pathogenic inherited germline variant in RNF43. The proband (III:1) and the proband's mother (II:2) were diagnosed with mismatch repair proficient CRCs at the age of 50 years and 65 years, respectively. Both patients had BRAF^V600E mutated colon tumours, indicating that the CRCs arose in sessile serrated lesions. The germline variant RNF43:c.375+1G>A was identified in both patients. RNA studies showed that this variant resulted in an aberrantly spliced transcript, which was predicted to encode RNF43:p.Ala126Ilefs*50 resulting in premature termination of protein synthesis and was classified as a likely-pathogenic variant. Our report adds further evidence to the hereditary role of RNF43 as a tumour suppressor gene in colorectal tumorigenesis and supports the inclusion of RNF43 as a gene of interest in the investigation of CRC predispositions outside the setting of serrated polyposis.

Psychosocial outcomes following germline multigene panel testing in an ethnically and economically diverse cohort of patients

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the psychological outcomes of germline multigene panel testing, particularly among diverse patients and those with moderate-risk pathogenic variants (PVs).

METHODS

Study participants (N = 1264) were counseled and tested with a 25- or 28-gene panel and completed a 3-month postresult survey including the Multidimensional Impact of Cancer Risk Assessment (MICRA).

RESULTS

The mean age was 52 years, 80% were female, and 70% had cancer; 45% were non-Hispanic White, 37% were Hispanic, 10% were Asian, 3% were Black, and 5% had another race/ethnicity. Approximately 28% had a high school education or less, and 23% were non-English-speaking. The genetic test results were as follows: 7% had a high-risk PV, 6% had a moderate-risk PV, 35% had a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), and 52% were negative. Most participants (92%) had a total MICRA score ≤ 38, which corresponded to a mean response of "never," "rarely," or only "sometimes" reacting negatively to results. A multivariate analysis found that mean total MICRA scores were significantly higher (more uncertainty/distress) among high- and moderate-risk PV carriers (29.7 and 24.8, respectively) than those with a VUS or negative results (17.4 and 16.1, respectively). Having cancer or less education was associated with a significantly higher total MICRA score; race/ethnicity was not associated with the total MICRA score. High- and moderate-risk PV carriers did not differ significantly from one another in the total MICRA score, uncertainty, distress, or positive experiences.

CONCLUSIONS

In a diverse population undergoing genetic counseling and multigene panel testing for hereditary cancer risk, the psychological response corresponded to test results and showed low distress and uncertainty. Further studies are needed to assess patient understanding and subsequent cancer screening among patients from diverse backgrounds.

LAY SUMMARY

Multigene panel tests for hereditary cancer have become widespread despite concerns about adverse psychological reactions among carriers of moderate-risk pathogenic variants (mutations) and among carriers of variants of uncertain significance. This large study of an ethnically and economically diverse cohort of patients undergoing panel testing found that 92% "never," "rarely," or only "sometimes" reacted negatively to results. Somewhat higher uncertainty and distress were identified among carriers of high- and moderate-risk pathogenic variants, and lower levels were identified among those with a variant of uncertain significance or a negative result. Although the psychological response corresponded to risk, reactions to testing were favorable, regardless of results.

Universal germline testing among patients with colorectal cancer: clinical actionability and optimised panel

PURPOSE

Universal germline testing in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) with a multigene panel can detect various hereditary cancer syndromes. This study was performed to understand how to choose a testing panel and whether the result would affect clinical management.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 486 eligible patients with CRC, including all patients with CRC diagnosed under age 70 years and patients with CRC diagnosed over 70 years with hereditary risk features between November 2017 and January 2018. All participants received germline testing for various hereditary cancer syndromes.

RESULTS

The prevalence of germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in cancer susceptibility genes was 7.8% (38/486), including 25 PVs in genes with high-risk CRC susceptibility (the minimal testing set) and 13 PVs in genes with moderate-risk CRC susceptibility or increased cancer risk other than CRC (the additional testing set). All the clinically relevant PVs were found in patients diagnosed under age 70 years. Among them, 11 patients would not have been diagnosed if testing reserved to present guidelines. Most (36/38) of the patients with PVs benefited from enhanced surveillance and tailored treatment. PVs in genes from the minimal testing set were found in all age groups, while patients carried PVs in genes from the additional testing set were older than 40 years.

CONCLUSION

Universal germline testing for cancer susceptibility genes should be recommended among all patients with CRC diagnosed under age 70 years. A broad panel including genes from the additional testing set might be considered for patients with CRC older than 40 years to clarify inheritance risks.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03365986.

Comparison of Colorectal and Endometrial Microsatellite Instability Tumor Analysis and Premm5 Risk Assessment for Predicting Pathogenic Germline Variants on Multigene Panel Testing

PURPOSE

Tumor testing for microsatellite instability and/or mismatch repair-deficiency (MSI/IHC) and clinical prediction models effectively screen for Lynch syndrome (LS)-associated colorectal cancer (CRC) and endometrial cancer (EC), but they have not been assessed for their ability to identify non-LS forms of inherited risk. The aim of this study was to compare MSI/IHC and the PREMM5 prediction model to identify carriers of LS and non-LS pathogenic variants (PVs) among patients with CRC and EC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data were retrospectively analyzed from two single-institution cohorts: 706 patients with CRC and/or EC referred for genetic evaluation/testing (high-risk cohort) and 1,058 consecutively ascertained patients with CRC (oncology clinic cohort), unselected for familial risk. All participants underwent germline multigene panel testing. PREMM5 scores were calculated from personal/family cancer history. The primary outcome was the proportion of individuals with germline PVs (LS PVs, high-penetrance PVs, and any PVs) who had abnormal MSI/IHC testing and/or PREMM5 score ≥ 2.5%.

RESULTS

MSI/IHC and PREMM5 had comparable sensitivity for identifying LS carriers in high-risk (89.3% v 85.7%; P = .712) and oncology clinic patients (96.6% v 96.6%; P = 1.000), although MSI/IHC had significantly superior specificity for LS (81.3% v 20.1%; P < .001; 92.3% v 24.3%; P < .001). In both cohorts, PREMM5 had superior sensitivity to MSI/IHC at identifying patients with any high-penetrance PVs and any low-, moderate-, and high-penetrance PVs. Among patients with normal MSI/IHC, PREMM5 identified 84.2% and 83.3% of high-risk patients with CRC/EC and oncology clinic CRC patients with high-penetrance PVs, respectively.

CONCLUSION

MSI/IHC and PREMM5 effectively identify patients with CRC and/or EC with LS, although MSI/IHC has better specificity for LS. Because PREMM5 identifies non-LS, high-penetrance germline PVs, patients with CRC and/or EC with PREMM5 score ≥ 2.5%, including those with normal MSI/IHC, should be offered multigene panel testing.

High tumor mutational burden and T-cell activation are associated with long-term response to anti-PD1 therapy in Lynch syndrome recurrent glioblastoma patient

BACKGROUND

Glioblastomas (GBMs) in patients harboring somatic or germinal mutations of mismatch-repair (MMR) genes exhibit a hypermutable phenotype. Here, we describe a GBM patient with increased tumor mutational burden and germline MMR mutations, treated using anti-PD1 therapy.

METHODS

A woman with newly diagnosed GBM (nGBM) was treated by surgery, radiotherapy, and temozolomide. The tumor recurred after 13 months leading to a second surgery and treatment with nivolumab. Whole-exome sequencing was performed on the nGBM, recurrent GBM (rGBM), and blood. Immune infiltration was investigated by immunohistochemistry and the immune response in the blood during treatment was analyzed by flow cytometry.

RESULTS

High density of infiltrating CD163 + cells was found in both GBM specimens. Large numbers of CD3 + and CD8 + T cells were homogeneously distributed in the nGBM. The infiltration of CD4 + T cells and a different CD8 + T cell density were observed in the rGBM. Both GBM shared 12,431 somatic mutations, with 113 substitutions specific to the nGBM and 1,683 specific to the rGBM. Germline variants included pathogenic mutation in the MSH2 (R359S) gene, suggesting the diagnosis of Lynch syndrome. Systemic immunophenotyping revealed the generation of CD8 + T memory cells and persistent activation of CD4 + T cells. The patient is still receiving nivolumab 68 months after the second surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Our observations indicate that the hypermutator phenotype associated with germinal mutations of MMR genes and abundant T-cell infiltration contributes to a durable clinical benefit sustained by a persistent and robust immune response during anti-PD1 therapy.

New Pathogenic Germline Variants in Very Early Onset and Familial Colorectal Cancer Patients

A genetic diagnosis facilitates personalized cancer treatment and clinical care of relatives at risk, however, although 25% of colorectal cancer cases are familial, around 95% of the families are genetically unresolved. In this study, we performed gene panel analysis on germline DNA of 32 established or candidate colorectal cancer predisposing genes in 149 individuals from either families with an accumulation of colorectal cancers or families with only one sporadic case of very early onset colorectal cancer (≤40 years at diagnosis). We identified pathogenic or likely pathogenic genetic variants in 10.1% of the participants in genes such as APC, POLE, MSH2 or PMS2. The MSH2 variant, c.2168C>T, p.(Ser723Phe) was previously described as a variant of unknown significance, but we have now reclassified it to be likely pathogenic. The POLE variant, c.1089C>A, p.(Asn363Lys) was identified in a patient with three metachronous colorectal cancers from age 28 and turned out to be de novo. One pathogenic PMS2 variant was novel. We also identified a number of highly interesting variants of unknown significance in APC, BUB1, TP53 and RPS20. The RPS20 variant is novel and was found in a large Amsterdam I positive family with a multi tumor phenotype including 12 cases of CRC from as early as age 24. This variant was found to segregate with cancer in the family and multiple in silico tools predict it to be pathogenic. Our data further support the shift from phenotypic-based cancer panels to large panels including all established genes involved in hereditary cancer syndromes or (targeted) whole genome sequencing. Additionally, identification of a likely disease-predisposing variant in RPS20 expands the phenotypic spectrum of RPS20-related cancers and emphasize that this gene is relevant to include in colorectal cancer gene panels.