Soluble ST2: a valuable prognostic marker in heart failure

What Do We Know So Far About Ventricular Arrhythmias and Sudden Cardiac Death Prediction in the Mitral Valve Prolapse Population? Could Biomarkers Help Us Predict Their Occurrence?

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

To summarize currently available data on the topic of mitral valve prolapse (MVP) and its correlation to the occurrence of atrial and ventricular arrhythmias. To assess the prognostic value of several diagnostic methods such as transthoracic echocardiography, transesophageal echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance, cardiac computed tomography, electrocardiography, and electrophysiology concerning arrhythmic episodes. To explore intra and extracellular biochemistry of the cardiovascular system and its biomarkers as diagnostic tools to predict rhythm disturbances in the MVP population.

RECENT FINDINGS

MVP is a common and mainly benign valvular disorder. It affects 2-3% of the general population. MVP is a heterogeneous and highly variable phenomenon with three structural phenotypes: myxomatous degeneration, fibroelastic deficiency, and forme fruste. Exercise intolerance, supraventricular tachycardia, and chest discomfort are the symptoms that are often paired with psychosomatic components. Though MVP is thought to be benign, the association between isolated MVP without mitral regurgitation (MR) or left ventricle dysfunction, with ventricular arrhythmia (VA) and sudden cardiac death (SCD) has been observed. The incidence of SCD in the MVP population is around 0.6% per year, which is 6 times higher than the occurrence of SCD in the general population. Often asymptomatic MVP population poses a challenge to screen for VA and prevent SCD. Therefore, it is crucial to carefully assess the risk of VA and SCD in patients with MVP with the use of various tools such as diagnostic imaging and biochemical and genetic screening.

Highly sensitive and specific graphene oxide-based FRET aptasensor for quantitative detection of human soluble growth stimulating gene protein 2

Soluble growth stimulation expressed gene 2 (sST2) is a new generation biomarker in the diagnosis and prognosis of heart failure (HF). Here, the sST2-specific aptamers were selected from a random ssDNA library with the full length of 88 nucleotides (nt) via target-immobilized magnetic beads (MB)-based systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment (SELEX) technology. After eight rounds of selection, six aptamers with the most enrichment were selected. Among, the aptamer L1 showed the high-affinity binding to sST2 with the lowest Kd value (77.3 ± 0.05 nM), which was chosen as the optimal aptamer for further molecular docking. Then, the aptamer L1 was used to construct a graphene oxide (GO) - based fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) biosensor for sST2, which exhibits a linear detection range of 0.1-100 μg/ml and a detection limit of 3.7 ng/ml. The aptasensor was applied to detect sST2 in real samples, with a good correlation and agreement with the traditional enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) when quantitative analyzing the sST2 concentration in serum samples from HF patients. The results show that not only an efficient strategy for screening the practicable aptamer, but also a rapid and sensitive detection platform for sST2 were established.

Association of D-dimer to albumin ratio with adverse cardiovascular outcomes in ischaemic heart failure patients with diabetes mellitus: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To determine the association of D-dimer to albumin ratio (DAR) with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in ischaemic heart failure patients with diabetes mellitus.

DESIGN

A retrospective observational cohort study.

SETTING

Single centre in Beijing, China, conducted at one of the largest cardiology centres in China.

PARTICIPANTS

From June 2017 to June 2019, 3707 patients with heart failure and concomitant multiple vessel disease undergoing elective PCI were screened. A total 1021 of patients were enrolled after exclusion and the follow-up period was up to 36 months.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The MACE was the primary measured outcome. The secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction and any revascularisation.

METHODS

These participants were grouped according to DAR tertiles. The cumulative incidence functions, Cox regression, restricted cubic spline and receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine the association between DAR and outcomes. The subgroup analysis was also performed.

RESULTS

After follow-up, MACE occurred in 404 (39.6%) participants. The cumulative hazards curve manifested significant differences in MACE, all-cause mortality and any revascularisation (log-rank test: all p<0.001). In adjusted models, DAR was an independent risk factor of MACE (tertile 2: HR 1.82, 95% CI 1.37 to 2.42; tertile 3: HR 1.74, 95% CI 1.28 to 2.36) and all-cause mortality (tertile 2: HR 2.04, 95% CI 1.35 to 3.11; tertile 3: HR 1.89, 95% CI 1.20 to 2.98). The optimal cut-off of DAR was 1.2. In the stratified analysis, sex, age, hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, total revascularisation and any interfered vessel did not affect the independent predictive ability.

CONCLUSION

Higher DAR was independently associated with MACE and all-cause mortality after PCI in ischaemic heart failure patients with diabetes mellitus.

Plasma soluble suppression of tumorigenesis 2 measured in the emergency department for diagnosis and outcome prediction of sepsis: A single-center prospective study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The diagnostic and prognostic performance of soluble Suppression of Tumorigenicity 2 (sST2) in suspected septic patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) is largely unknown.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients were included in this prospective study if there was high suspicion of sepsis. The plasma level of sST2 was measured during initial ED evaluation. Outcomes were the evaluation of (1) sST2 diagnostic performance (alone and in combination with procalcitonin [PCT]), and (2) sST2 ability to predict 30-day and 90-day all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

Among 569 patients included, 481 (84.5 %) had sepsis or septic shock. Plasma sST2 levels were more elevated in septic patients (159 [71-331] vs 50 [31-103] ng/mL, P < 0.001). The AUC of sST2 for sepsis diagnosis was lower than the AUC of PCT (0.76 vs 0.85, P = 0.03). The best cut-off for sST2 was 61.7 ng/mL, with a sensitivity of 79.9 % and a specificity of 70.6 %. sST2 was able to correctly reclassify septic patients with PCT <0.5 (NRI 28.9 % [P = 0.02]). sST2 level was an independent predictor of 30-day mortality in a model including clinical variables (aHR 2.03 [1.24-3.33], C-index 0.69).

CONCLUSION

sST2 could be a useful adjunct in diagnosing sepsis and in all-cause mortality prediction.

Soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 is a potential predictor of post-liver transplant renal outcomes

Acute kidney injury is considered an independent prognostic factor for mortality in patients with liver cirrhosis. Non-treated acute kidney injury can progress to hepatorenal syndrome with a poor prognosis. As suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (ST2) is a member of the interleukin-1 receptor family that aggravates inflammation and fibrotic changes in multiple organs, we measured soluble ST2 (sST2) level in the serum and urine of liver-transplant recipients at the time of transplantation. The serum sST2 level significantly increased in liver-transplant recipients with suppressed kidney function compared with that in recipients with normal function. In recipients with severely decreased liver function (model for end-stage liver disease score ≥ 30), the serum sST2 level was higher than that in recipients with preserved liver function (model for end-stage liver disease score ≤ 20, P = 0.028). The serum sST2 level in recipients with hepatorenal syndrome was higher than that in liver-transplant recipients without hepatorenal syndrome (P = 0.003). The serum sST2 level in patients with hepatorenal syndrome was higher than that in recipients without a history of acute kidney injury (P = 0.004). Recipients with hepatorenal syndrome and recovered kidney function showed higher sST2 levels than those who did not recover (P = 0.034). Collectively, an increase in the serum sST2 level reflects a decrease in both kidney and liver functions. Thus, measuring sST2 level at the time of liver transplantation can help predict renal outcomes.

sST2 Levels Show No Association with Helicobacter pylori Infection in Asymptomatic Patients: Implications for Biomarker Research

INTRODUCTION

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is a prevalent stomach bacterium that can cause a range of clinical outcomes, including gastric cancer. In recent years, soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 (sST2) has gained attention as a biomarker associated with various diseases, such as gastric cancer. The purpose of this study was to explore the possible connection between H. pylori infection and sST2 levels in patients who do not exhibit symptoms.

METHODS

A total of 694 patients from the Salzburg Colon Cancer Prevention Initiative (Sakkopi) were included in the study. The prevalence of H. pylori infection was determined by histology, and sST2 levels were measured in serum samples. Clinical and laboratory parameters, such as age, sex, BMI, smoking status, hypertension, and metabolic syndrome, were also collected.

RESULTS

The median sST2 concentration was similar between patients with (9.62; 7.18-13.44 ng/mL; p = 0.66) and without (9.67; 7.08-13.06 ng/mL) H. pylori. Logistic regression analysis did not show any association (OR 1.00; 95%CI 0.97-1.04; p = 0.93) between sST2 levels and H. pylori infection, which remained so (aOR 0.99; 95%CI 0.95-1.03; p = 0.60) after adjustment for age, sex, educational status, and metabolic syndrome. In addition, sensitivity analyses stratified by age, sex, BMI, smoking status, educational status, and the concomitant diagnosis of metabolic syndrome could not show any association between sST2 levels and H. pylori infection.

CONCLUSION

The results indicate that sST2 may not serve as a valuable biomarker in the diagnosis and treatment of H. pylori infection. Our findings are of relevance for further research investigating sST2, as we could not find an influence of asymptomatic H. pylori infection on sST2 concentration. WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN?: Soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 (sST2) has gained attention as a biomarker associated with various diseases, such as gastric cancer. WHAT IS NEW IN THIS STUDY?: The median sST2 concentration was similar between patients with (9.62; 7.18-13.44 ng/mL; p = 0.66) and without (9.67; 7.08-13.06 ng/mL) H. pylori. WHAT ARE THE FUTURE CLINICAL AND RESEARCH IMPLICATIONS OF THE STUDY FINDINGS?: The results indicate that sST2 may not serve as a valuable biomarker in the diagnosis and treatment of H. pylori infection.