Zeta potential vs apoptotic marker: which is more suitable for ICSI sperm selection?

Microfluidic in compared with Zeta potential, MACS and swim up methods, resulted in improved chromatin integrity and high quality sperms

OBJECTIVE

Sperm parameters and DNA integrity are crucial factors in ART outcomes. This study compared four sperm preparation methods (microfluidics, MACS, zeta potential, and swim-Up) for sorting spermatozoa with normal parameters and chromatin integrity.

METHODS

This study evaluated semen samples from 25 couples with male factor infertility. The semen samples were divided into four portions: one prepared by MACS, one by zeta potential, the other by microfluidics, and the last by swim-up. After preparation, sperm viability, motility, and morphology were assessed based on the WHO guidelines. DNA intergrity was assessed by SDF assay, and the CMA3 staining test was used to evaluate sperm chromatin packaging.

RESULTS

Compared to other preparation techniques, microfluidic preparation significantly improved sperm parameters, including motility, viability, morphology, and DNA integrity as well as chromatin packaging (p-value <0.05). The results also demonstrated that sperm motility, viability, and sperm DNA integrity as well as chromatin packaging, were not significantly different after preparation with MACS and Zeta potential methods. However, the MACS and Zeta methods produced improved sperm parameters and better DNA integrity than the swim-up method.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that microfluidics can improve sperm quality compared to other methods of sperm preparation. When the microfluidic chip is not available, considering the similar results of sperm preparation by MACS and Zeta potential methods, it is preferred to use the Zeta method for the ART cycle due to its simplicity and cost-effectiveness.

A Narrative Review on the Sperm Selection Methods in Assisted Reproductive Technology: Out with the New, the Old Is Better?

Background: Male infertility, accounting for nearly half of infertility cases worldwide, has spurred significant research into its causes, diagnosis, and treatment strategies. Genetic abnormalities, social causes, environmental exposures, lifestyle, and further health conditions are key contributors. Methods: Essential to improving the outcomes of ART is, among other things, the selection of high-quality sperm, which requires methods that assess sperm motility, morphology, DNA integrity, and oxidative stress levels. Results: Traditional techniques such as semen analysis, swim-up, and density gradient centrifugation (DGC) are still widely used, but there is ongoing discussion regarding the limitations in detecting DNA damage and oxidative stress. Advanced methods like magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS) and microfluidic sorting have emerged as more precise tools for selecting sperm with better genetic integrity, although they face challenges in terms of their standardization, cost, and clinical adoption. Emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI) and Raman spectroscopy offer the potential for more automated, accurate sperm selection, minimizing human error and variability. However, the integration of these methods into clinical practice requires further validation through large-scale studies, including assessments of their long-term safety and cost-effectiveness. Conclusions: Future research should focus on refining sperm selection techniques, tailoring them to personalized infertility approaches, and addressing the gaps in the evidence to improve ART outcomes and patient care.

Microfluidics-A novel technique for high-quality sperm selection for greater ART outcomes

Microfluidics represent a quality sperm selection technique. Human couples fail to conceive and this is so in a significant population of animals worldwide. Defects in male counterpart lead to failure of conception so are outcomes of assisted reproduction affected by quality of sperm. Microfluidics, deals with minute volumes (μL) of liquids run in small-scale microchannel networks in the form of laminar flow streamlines. Microfluidic sperm selection designs have been developed in chip formats, mimicking in vivo situations. Here sperms are selected and analyzed based on motility and sperm behavioral properties. Compared to conventional sperm selection methods, this selection method enables to produce high-quality motile sperm cells possessing non-damaged or least damaged DNA, achieve greater success of insemination in bovines, and achieve enhanced pregnancy rates and live births in assisted reproduction-in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Besides, the concentration of sperm available to oocyte can be controlled by regulating the flow rate in microfluidic chips. The challenges in this technology are commercialization of chips, development of fully functional species-specific microfluidic tools, limited number of studies available in literature, and need of thorough understanding in reproductive physiology of domestic animals. In conclusion, incorporation of microfluidic system in assisted reproduction for sperm selection may promise a great success in IVF and ICSI outcomes. Future prospectives are to make this technology more superior and need to modify chip designs which is cost effective and species specific and ready for commercialization. Comprehensive studies in animal species are needed to be carried out for wider application of microfluidic sperm selection in in vitro procedures.

Microfluidics: The future of sperm selection in assisted reproduction

BACKGROUND

Obtaining functional sperm cells is the first step to treat infertility. With the ever-increasing trend in male infertility, clinicians require access to effective solutions that are able to single out the most viable spermatozoa, which would max out the chance for a successful pregnancy. The new generation techniques for sperm selection involve microfluidics, which offers laminar flow and low Reynolds number within the platforms can provide unprecedented opportunities for sperm selection. Previous studies showed that microfluidic platforms can provide a novel approach to this challenge and since then researchers across the globe have attacked this problem from multiple angles.

OBJECTIVE

In this review, we seek to provide a much-needed bridge between the technical and medical aspects of microfluidic sperm selection. Here, we provide an up-to-date list on microfluidic sperm selection procedures and its application in assisted reproductive technology laboratories.

SEARCH METHOD

A literature search was performed in Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus to select papers reporting microfluidic sperm selection using the keywords: microfluidic sperm selection, self-motility, non-motile sperm selection, boundary following, rheotaxis, chemotaxis, and thermotaxis. Papers published before March 31, 2023 were selected.

OUTCOMES

Our results show that most studies have used motility-based properties for sperm selection. However, microfluidic platforms are ripe for making use of other properties such as chemotaxis and especially rheotaxis. We have identified that low throughput is one of the major hurdles to current microfluidic sperm selection chips, which can be solved via parallelization.

CONCLUSION

Future work needs to be performed on numerical simulation of the microfluidics chip prior to fabrication as well as relevant clinical assessment after the selection procedure. This would require a close collaboration and understanding among engineers, biologists, and medical professionals. It is interesting that in spite of two decades of microfluidics sperm selection, numerical simulation and clinical studies are lagging behind. It is expected that microfluidic sperm selection platforms will play a major role in the development of fully integrated start-to-finish assisted reproductive technology systems.

Emerging trends in sperm selection: enhancing success rates in assisted reproduction

This comprehensive review explores the evolving landscape of sperm selection techniques within the realm of Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART). Our analysis delves into a range of methods from traditional approaches like density gradient centrifugation to advanced techniques such as Magnetic-Activated Cell Sorting (MACS) and Intracytoplasmic Morphologically Selected Sperm Injection (IMSI). We critically assess the efficacy of these methods in terms of sperm motility, morphology, DNA integrity, and other functional attributes, providing a detailed comparison of their clinical outcomes. We highlight the transition from conventional sperm selection methods, which primarily focus on physical characteristics, to more sophisticated techniques that offer a comprehensive evaluation of sperm molecular properties. This shift not only promises enhanced prediction of fertilization success but also has significant implications for improving embryo quality and increasing the chances of live birth. By synthesizing various studies and research papers, we present an in-depth analysis of the predictability of different sperm selection procedures in ART. The review also discusses the clinical applicability of these methods, emphasizing their potential in shaping the future of assisted reproduction. Our findings suggest that the integration of advanced sperm selection strategies in ART could lead to more cost-effective treatments with reduced duration and higher success rates. This review aims to provide clinicians and researchers in reproductive medicine with comprehensive insights into the current state and future prospects of sperm selection technologies in ART.

An Alternative Application of Magnetic-Activated Cell Sorting: CD45 and CD235a Based Purification of Semen and Testicular Tissue Samples

Magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS) is a well-known sperm selection technique, which is able to remove apoptotic spermatozoa from semen samples using the classic annexinV based method. Leukocytes and erythrocytes in semen samples or in testicular tissue processed for in vitro fertilization (IVF) could exert detrimental effects on sperm. In the current study, we rethought the aforementioned technique and used magnetic microbeads conjugated with anti-CD45/CD235a antibodies to eliminate contaminating leukocytes and erythrocytes from leukocytospermic semen samples and testicular tissue samples gained via testicular sperm extraction (TESE). With this technique, a 15.7- and a 30.8-fold reduction could be achieved in the ratio of leukocytes in semen and in the number of erythrocytes in TESE samples, respectively. Our results show that MACS is a method worth to reconsider, with more potential alternative applications. Investigations to find molecules labeling high-quality sperm population and the development of positive selection procedures based on these might be a direction of future research.

Density Gradient Centrifugation Alone or the Combination of DGC with Annexin V Magnetic-Activated Cell Sorting Prior to Cryopreservation Enhances the Postthaw Quality of Sperm from Infertile Male Patients with Poor Sperm Quality

Objective. To examine whether density gradient centrifugation (DGC) alone or its combination with annexin V magnetic-activated cell sorting (DGC-MACS) can be used to process semen samples from infertile male patients with poor sperm quality prior to subjecting these to freeze/thaw process in order to optimize the outcomes of sperm freezing. Methods. This study enrolled sixteen patients with sperm $\text{concentration}\ge 20\times {10}^6/\text{mL}$ , sperm $\text{motility}<30$ %, and/or <4% normal sperm morphology. Sperms were processed by DGC or DGC-MACS prior to the freeze/thaw process. Sperm motility, hyperosmotic swelling test (HOS), TUNEL test, and morphological analysis were performed before and after the freeze/thaw process. Results. The freeze/thaw process had a detrimental effect on sperm motility, viability, morphology, and DNA integrity in all three groups (RAW, DGC, and DGC + MACS groups). The DGC and DGC + MACS groups showed increased sperm motility, viability, and normal morphology following freeze/thaw than untreated frozen controls. The motility and viability were not significantly different between DGC-MACS-CPT (cryopreservation-thawing) and DGC-CPT groups. Moreover, almost no grade A or grade B sperm was observed in the DGC-MACS-CPT groups. The sperm selected by DGC or DGC + MACS showed decreased levels of sperm DNA fragmentation than RAW samples following freeze/thaw. Moreover, the sperm DNA fragmentation following freeze/thaw in the DGC-MACS-CPT group was significantly lower than that in the DGC-CPT group. Conclusions. Sperm preparation by DGC before cryopreservation improved the quality of sperm postthaw in infertile males with poor sperm quality. If the sperm quality following freeze/thaw is foreseen to be insufficient for artificial insemination with husband’s sperm or in vitro fertilization, or if there is high DNA fragmentation in RAW sperm, DGC + MACS should be used prior to cryopreservation to reduce sperm DNA fragmentation and improve the quality of sperm available for intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Sperm selection with Annexin-V coated polystrene bead technique (APB-Tech): A novel and reliable method for the microscopic selection of viable and non-apoptotic sperm to be used for intracytoplasmic sperm injection

Infertility is a growing health problem that affects 20% of couples who want to conceive. 'Intracytoplasmic sperm injection' (ICSI) is a commonly used assisted reproduction treatment technique that offers the couples to overcome a wide variety of infertility reasons, including female, male and unexplained infertility. A crucial step in ICSI is choosing the correct sperm with the highest potential to form a healthy embryo and thus a healthy offspring. The sperm selection strategies aim to obtain a sperm population with better motility and morphology, which are insufficient to predict a sperm's reproductive potential. The elimination of apoptotic sperms, which is shown to be higher in infertile males and which is shown to affect embryo development and reproductive cohort significantly should also be included in the selection strategies. Among all sperm selection methods, there are only a few which can eliminate apoptotic sperm, but because they need extra types of equipments, a long training period, and high costs, they couldn't find place in the most commonly used techniques in an IVF lab. Selecting the non-apoptotic sperm cells will help us choose a sperm that is more likely to be chosen by the natural selection mechanisms and thus will help to mimic the natural conception more. The study aimed to develop a novel, easy and a harmless individual sperm selection technique to enable choosing non-apoptotic viable sperm cells via light microscopy without any need for extra equipment, education and cost to be used for ''ICSI'. The technique is based on the binding ability of Annexin-V covered polystrene beads to the externalized phosphatidylserine at the outer leaflet of an apoptotic sperm's plasma membrane. After Annexin-V covered polystyrene beads were prepared, beads obtained were attached to BALB-c mice sperm, and the technique is optimized to obtain the most efficient attachment conditions. The results are then compared with the results of four well-known reliable apoptosis detection techniques to test the validity and sperm survival test to test the toxicity of the technique. The method is proven to be '''reliable' by comparing it with the results of well-known techniques, including TUNEL and SCSA (sperm chromatin structure assay), and '''safe' by showing its non-toxicity via sperm survival test (SST). In addition, the method enables the selection of sperm cells more closer to naturally-chosen ones from a pool of sperm that should not be allowed to be randomly chosen during microinjection. To date, it was impossible to distinguish a non-apoptotic sperm without harming it or without needing additional equipment other than a routine IVF lab and extra training other than routine andrology work. The technique is named as 'Annexin-V coated polystyrene bead technique (APB-Tech)'. Based on our results, further studies on APB-Tech should be focused on the possible improvement of ICSI outcomes and, thus, success rates.

Advanced Sperm Selection Strategies as a Treatment for Infertile Couples: A Systematic Review

Assisted reproductive technology (ART) is an essential tool to overcome infertility, and is a worldwide disease that affects millions of couples at reproductive age. Sperm selection is a crucial step in ART treatment, as it ensures the use of the highest quality sperm for fertilization, thus increasing the chances of a positive outcome. In recent years, advanced sperm selection strategies for ART have been developed with the aim of mimicking the physiological sperm selection that occurs in the female genital tract. This systematic review sought to evaluate whether advanced sperm selection techniques could improve ART outcomes and sperm quality/functionality parameters compared to traditional sperm selection methods (swim-up or density gradients) in infertile couples. According to preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA guidelines), the inclusion and exclusion criteria were defined in a PICOS (population, intervention, comparator, outcome, study) table. A systematic search of the available literature published in MEDLINE-PubMed until December 2021 was subsequently conducted. Although 4237 articles were recorded after an initial search, only 47 studies were finally included. Most reports (30/47; 63.8%) revealed an improvement in ART outcomes after conducting advanced vs. traditional sperm selection methods. Among those that also assessed sperm quality/functionality parameters (12/47), there was a consensus (10/12; 83.3%) about the beneficial effect of advanced sperm selection methods on these variables. In conclusion, the application of advanced sperm selection methods improves ART outcomes. In spite of this, as no differences in the reproductive efficiency between advanced methods has been reported, none can be pointed out as a gold standard to be conducted routinely. Further research addressing whether the efficiency of each method relies on the etiology of infertility is warranted.

MACS-DGC versus DGC Sperm Wash Procedure: Comparing Clinical Outcomes in Couples with Male Factor Infertility Undergoing ICSI: A Clinical Trial Study

BACKGROUND

: Implementation of sperm preparation techniques based on cellular and molecular characteristics can improve the clinical outcomes of couples with male factor infertility. These methods attempt to select better sperm compared to classical methods of preparation such as swim-up and density gradient centrifugation (DGC). In this view, the aim of this study was the comparison of clinical outcomes of magnetic-activated cell separation (MACS) followed by DGC or DGC alone in infertile men undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For this prospective single parallel blind clinical trial study, 206 infertile couples with male factor infertility and having abnormal sperm morphology higher than 96% were included. 106 and 100 couples were considered for the study (MACS-DGC) and control group (DGC), respectively. Clinical outcomes of ICSI; fertilization, embryo quality, and implantation, pregnancy rates were compared between two groups.

RESULTS

Mean of fertilization (80.19 ± 1.88 vs. 75.63 ± 2.06, P=0.1), top embryo quality on the day 3 (30.22 ± 3.59 vs. 17.96 ± 2.9, P=0.009), clinical pregnancy (30.76% vs. 22.22%, P=0.19), and implantation rate (18.12% vs. 10.42%, P=0.04) were higher in the study group compared to the control group.

CONCLUSION

Sperm preparation by MACS followed by DGC in teratozoospermic men could improve the clinical outcomes after ICSI (Registration number: IRCT201610317223N8).

Sperm Selection for ICSI: Do We Have a Winner?

In assisted reproductive technology (ART), the aim of sperm cells’ preparation is to select competent spermatozoa with the highest fertilization potential and in this context, the intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) represents the most applied technique for fertilization. This makes the process of identifying the perfect spermatozoa extremely important. A number of methods have now been developed to mimic some of the natural selection processes that exist in the female reproductive tract. Although many studies have been conducted to identify the election technique, many doubts and disagreements still remain. In this review, we will discuss all the sperm cell selection techniques currently available for ICSI, starting from the most basic methodologies and continuing with those techniques suitable for sperm cells with reduced motility. Furthermore, different techniques that exploit some sperm membrane characteristics and the most advanced strategy for sperm selection based on microfluidics, will be examined. Finally, a new sperm selection method based on a micro swim-up directly on the ICSI dish will be analyzed. Eventually, advantages and disadvantages of each technique will be debated, trying to draw reasonable conclusions on their efficacy in order to establish the gold standard method.

A scientometric analysis of research publications on male infertility and assisted reproductive technology

Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) are considered as one of the primary management options to address severe male factor infertility. The purpose of this study was to identify the research trends in the field of male infertility and ART over the past 20 years (2000-2019) by analysing scientometric data (the number of publications per year, authors, author affiliations, journals, countries, type of documents, subject area and number of citations) retrieved using the Scopus database. We used VOS viewer software to generate a network map on international collaborations as well as a heat map of the top scientists in this field. Our results revealed a total of 2,148 publications during this period with Cleveland Clinic Foundation contributing the most (n = 69). The current scientometric analysis showed that the research trend on ART has been stable over the past two decades. Further in-depth analysis revealed that density gradient centrifugation (46%) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (59.2%) are the most reported techniques for sperm separation and ART, respectively. Additionally, azoospermia was the most studied clinical scenario (60.6%), with majority of articles reporting pregnancy rate (47.25%) as the primary reproductive outcome for ART. This study provides insight into the current focus of research in the area of male infertility and ART as well as the areas that require further research in future.

A methodological validation of an easy one-step swimout semen preparation procedure for selecting DNA fragmentation-free spermatozoa for ICSI

The main purpose of this methodological paper was to describe a recently designed one-step ICSI semen preparation swim-out method (called swim-ICSI) and to compare its efficacy with our conventional two-step swim-out method for the selection of motile spermatozoa for ICSI with minimal DNA damage. In this observational cohort study, 42 fresh ejaculate sperm samples for ICSI were included to compare the new swim-ICSI with the conventional swim-out. In a sub-analysis (n = 20), both in-house designed ICSI preparation methods were compared with a commercial magnetic-activated cell sorting test (MACS^® ). Sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF), using Halosperm^® , was determined at different time points during sperm preparation: on the native sample (a), after density gradient centrifugation (DG) (b), on the motile (A + B) spermatozoa selected with conventional swim-out post-DG (c) and selected with swim-ICSI method post-DG (d). For a subgroup (n = 20), SDF was also calculated after MACS (e). The mean SDF significantly reduced after EACH preparation step and reduced to almost zero in the recovered A + B spermatozoa when the semen prepared with DG was further processed for ICSI (swim-ICSI vs. swim-out, p = .001). In conclusion, the optimised one-step and fine-tuned swim-ICSI technique shows the possibility to select a population of spermatozoa with almost zero SDF to be used in ICSI treatments.

Novel Techniques of Sperm Selection for Improving IVF and ICSI Outcomes

Almost 50% of the infertility cases are due to male factors. Assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) allow to overcome the incapacity of these patients' spermatozoa to fertilize the oocyte and produce a viable and healthy offspring, but the efficiency of the different techniques has still the potential to improve. According to the latest reports of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention of the United States (CDC), the percentages of deliveries per ART cycle in 2014 and 2016 were 21 and 22%, respectively. Among the reasons for this relatively low efficiency, the quality of the spermatozoa has been pointed out as critical, and the presence of high percentages of DNA-damaged spermatozoa in patients' ejaculates is possibly one of the main factors reducing the ARTs outcomes. Thus, one of the main challenges in reproductive medicine is to ensure the highest quality of the spermatozoa used in ARTs, and specifically, in terms of genetic integrity. The latest techniques for the preparation and selection of human spermatozoa are herein discussed focusing on those proven to improve one or several of the following parameters: sperm genetic integrity, fertilization capacity, embryo production, and in vitro survival, as well as pregnancy and delivery rates following in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). In addition, we discuss the potential of techniques developed in non-human mammals that could be further transferred to the clinic.

DGC/Zeta as A New Strategy to Improve Clinical Outcome in Male Factor Infertility Patients following Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection: A Randomized, Single-Blind, Clinical Trial

Objective

The aim of this blind randomised clinical trial study was to assess the clinical efficiency of combined density gradient centrifugation/Zeta (DGC/Zeta) sperm selection procedure compared to conventional DGC in infertile men candidates for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). The literature shows that DGC/Zeta is more effective compared to DGC alone in selection of sperms with normal chromatin and improves the clinical outcome of the ICSI procedure. Therefore, this study re-evaluates the efficiency of DGC/Zeta in improving the clinical outcomes of ICSI in an independent clinical setting.

Materials and Methods

In this randomized, single-blind, clinical trial, a total of 240 couples with male factor infertility and at least one abnormal sperm parameter were informed regarding the study and 220 participated. Based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, 103 and 102 couples were randomly allocated into the DGC/Zeta and DGC groups, respectively. ICSI outcomes were followed and compared between the two groups.

Results

Although there was no significant difference in fertilization rate (P=0.67) between the DGC/Zeta and DGC groups, mean percentage of good embryo quality (P=0.04), good blastocysts quality (P=0.049), expanded blastocysts (P=0.007), chemical pregnancies (P=0.005) and clinical pregnancies (P=0.007) were significantly higher in the DGC/ Zeta group compared to DGC. In addition, implantation rate was insignificantly higher in DGC/Zeta compared to DGC (P=0.17).

Conclusion

This is the second independent study showing combined DGC/Zeta procedure improves ICSI outcomes, especially the pregnancy rate, compared to the classical DGC procedure and this is likely related to the improved quality of sperm selected by the DGC/Zeta procedure (Registration number: IRCT20180628040270N1).

Emerging technologies for home-based semen analysis

With about 70 million cases of infertility worldwide, half of which are caused by male factors, sperm analysis is critical to determine male fertility potential. Conventional semen analysis methods involve complex and manual inspection with a microscope, and these methods are labor intensive and can take several days. Due to unavailability of rapid, convenient, and user-friendly semen analysis tools, many men do not seek medical evaluation, especially in resource-constrained settings. Furthermore, as conventional methods have to be conducted in the laboratories, many men are unwilling to be tested as a result of social stigma in certain regions of the world. One solution can be found in at-home sperm analysis, which allows men to test their semen without the hassle of going to and paying for a clinic. Herein, we examine current at-home sperm analysis technologies and compare them to the traditional laboratory-based methods. In addition, we discuss emerging sperm analysis approaches and describe their limitations and future directions.

Sperm function tests in clinical practice

Conventional semen analysis solely is not completely adequate to predict pregnancy outcomes. Therefore, advanced sperm function tests have been developed and introduced to clinical practice. These tests use different methods and techniques to evaluate different stages of fertilization steps. In this review, we reported some commonly used sperm function tests: sperm penetration assay, sperm-zona pellucida binding test (hemizona assay), acrosomal reaction test, hyaluronan binding test, hypo-osmotic swelling test, magnetic-activated cell sorting and zeta sperm selection. We discussed the literature concerning these tests, the utilization techniques and also purpose and mechanism of each test. We emphasized the importance of sperm function tests in predicting in vitro fertilization and pregnancy outcomes and in the management of infertile couples and also the limitations of these tests. Along with improvements in molecular biology techniques, we believe that more applicative and beneficial tests will be developed in the near future.

DNA fragmentation in human sperm after magnetic-activated cell sorting

PURPOSE

As fertilization with unselected apoptotic spermatozoa may contribute to failures in assisted reproductive techniques, it has become essential to remove this type of sperm in order to increase the success rates. Magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS) is a sperm preparation technique that isolates non-apoptotic spermatozoa based on the expression of phosphatidylserine in the membrane of apoptotic sperm. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate whether there was a significant decrease in sperm DNA fragmentation (sDNAfrag) and verify which protocol was the most efficient.

METHODS

Hundred semen samples were allocated into five distinct groups and processed according to a combination of MACS with density gradient centrifugation (DGC) and swim-up (SU) techniques. Sperm DNA fragmentation was evaluated by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL) assay.

RESULTS

Groups DGC-SU (73.4 %), DGC-MACS-SU (78.9 %), DGC-SU-MACS (53.8 %) and MACS-SU (73.5 %) presented a significant decrease in sDNAfrag but the highest reduction rate was obtained with MACS-DGC-SU (83.3 %). The later was also negatively correlated with sperm vitality, membrane integrity and progressive motility. Additionally, teratozoospermic patients presented a tendency to have lower sDNAfrag reduction rates than asthenozoospermic and asthenoteratozoospermic patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the results, MACS showed potential to optimize the sDNAfrag reduction rate, when applied to raw semen, before DGC and SU, especially in samples with low values of progressive motility, vitality and hypoosmotic swelling test.