Retrospective analysis of treatments with recombinant FSH and recombinant LH versus human menopausal gonadotropin in women with reduced ovarian reserve

FSH/LH co-stimulation in Advanced Maternal Age (AMA) and hypo-responder patients - Arabian gulf delphi consensus group

Background

In a global effort to assess expert perspectives on the use of recombinant gonadotropins, recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-hLH) and recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (r-hFSH), a consensus meeting was held in Dubai. The key aim was to address three critical questions: What are the factors that influence follicle response to gonadotropins? Which categories of patients are most likely to benefit from LH supplementation? And what are the optimal management strategies for these patients?

Methods

A panel of thirty-six experts reviewed and refined the initial statements and references proposed by the Scientific Coordinator. Consensus was defined as agreement or disagreement by more than two-thirds (66%) of the panel members for each statement.

Results

Thirty-five statements were formulated, of which thirty-one reached consensus. For patients with Hypo-Response to Gonadotropin Stimulation (20 statements), all identified risk factors, including advanced age, high BMI, and chronic conditions, achieved unanimous agreement. Diagnostic approaches, such as the inclusion of POSEIDON criteria and hormone level monitoring, were endorsed by the majority, with over 90% agreement. Management strategies, particularly individualized stimulation protocols and optimized scheduling, garnered broad consensus, with only one statement falling short of the threshold. Additionally, in cases of severe FSH and LH deficiency, combining r-hFSH with r-hLH was found to improve pregnancy rates and cost efficiency compared to human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG). For patients with Advanced Maternal Age (AMA) (15 statements), there was strong agreement on the use of oral contraceptive pills and estrogen priming. Recommendations concerning antagonist protocols and dosing of r-hLH and r-hFSH also achieved high levels of consensus. Significant agreement supported r-hLH supplementation and a tailored approach to luteal phase support. However, there were mixed opinions on the route of progesterone administration, with some experts expressing neutral or disagreeing views. Despite these differences, unanimous consensus was reached on markers of treatment success, particularly live birth rates, pregnancy rates, and embryo development, underscoring the importance of these outcomes in evaluating treatment efficacy.

Conclusion

This consensus provides a practical clinical perspective to a wide range of global professionals on the strategies employed during key phases of Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) treatment. To further improve outcomes, incorporating additional clinical insights on ART approaches, alongside existing guidelines and policies, may offer valuable guidance for optimizing patient care.

Dosing Characteristics of Recombinant Human Luteinizing Hormone or Human Menopausal Gonadotrophin-Derived LH Activity in Patients Undergoing Ovarian Stimulation: A German Fertility Database Study

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to evaluate dosing of recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-hLH) or human menopausal gonadotrophin (hMG)-derived medications with LH activity in ovarian stimulation (OS) cycles for in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).

DESIGN

A non-interventional study was performed to analyse data from the German RecDate database (January 2007-December 2011).

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Starting/total r-hLH/hMG dose, OS duration/cycle number, r-hLH/hMG initiation day (first day of administration), and population/cycle characteristics were assessed in women (≥18 years) undergoing OS for IVF/ICSI using r-hLH or hMG-derived medications (excluding corifollitropin alfa, clomiphene citrate, letrozole, mini/micro-dose human chorionic gonadotrophin, and urofollitropin alone). Data were summarized descriptively.

RESULTS

67,858 identified cycles utilized medications containing r-hLH (10,749), hMG (56,432), or both (677). Mean (standard deviation) OS duration with r-hLH and hMG was 10.1 (4.43) and 9.8 (6.16) days, respectively. Median (25th-75th percentile) r-hLH starting dose (75.0 [75.0-150.0] IU) was consistent across patients regardless of age, infertility diagnosis, or gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) protocol. Median (25th-75th percentile) hMG-derived LH activity starting dose was 225.0 (150.0-300.0) IU, regardless of GnRH protocol, but was lower in women aged <35 years and those with ovulation disorders/polycystic ovary syndrome. Median (25th-75th percentile) total dose for r-hLH (750.0 [337.5-1,125.0] IU) and hMG-derived LH activity (1,575.0 [750.0-2,625.0] IU) varied according to patients' age, infertility diagnosis, cycle number, and r-hLH/hMG initiation day. GnRH antagonist use resulted in a numerically higher median total hMG-derived LH activity dose than GnRH agonist use.

LIMITATIONS

The data used in this study were taken from electronic medical records relating to a specific timeframe (2007-2011) and therefore may not accurately reflect current clinical practice; however, it is likely that the differences between the two compounds would be maintained. Additionally, secondary data sources may suffer from uniformity and quality issues.

CONCLUSIONS

The standard of care for OS cycles is described with respect to IVF/ICSI treatment including an LH component in Germany during the specified timeframe.

Clinical Outcomes in Patients Receiving Originator Follitropin Alfa and Follitropin Alfa Biosimilars in Real-world Clinical Practice: A Retrospective Study

Background

Biosimilar drugs have broadened the treatment options in assisted reproductive technology (ART). Real-world data comparing clinical outcomes of originator follitropin alfa (Gonal-f®) with its biosimilars are required to enrich the body of evidence for clinical decision-making on choice of drug.

Aims

To compare the ART outcomes in patients receiving originator follitropin (Gonal-f®) and its biosimilars in clinical setting.

Settings and Design

Medical records of 364 infertile women who underwent ART between 2016 and 2020 at Akanksha Hospital and Research Institute, Gujrat, India, were retrospectively analysed.

Materials and Methods

Participants were divided into two cohorts based on treatment (Gonal-f® cohort; N = 174 and biosimilar cohort; N = 190), each cohort further subdivided into group A (age <35 years) and group B (age ≥35 years). Fresh or frozen embryo transfer was performed as per the standard procedures of the clinic. Pregnancy rates and live birth rate (LBR) were the primary main outcome measures in this study.

Statistical Analysis Used

Descriptive statistics and Chi-square test were used for analysis.

Results

The number of oocytes retrieved from Gonal-f® and biosimilar cohorts were comparable (13.3 vs. 14.4). Compared to biosimilars, Gonal-f® treatment resulted in higher yield of cleavage stage and blastocyst stage embryos, and the proportion of women with good quality embryos was higher in the Gonal-f® cohort than the biosimilar cohort (83.3% vs. 69.5%). Patients receiving Gonal-f® reported higher pregnancy rates (59.2% vs. 39.7%) and LBR (43% vs. 17.7%) compared to those receiving biosimilars.

Conclusions

Gonal-f® (originator follitropin) treatment could result in higher pregnancy rates and LBR in comparison to biosimilars in real-world setting.

LH increases the response to FSH in granulosa-lutein cells from sub/poor-responder patients in vitro

STUDY QUESTION

Does LH addition to FSH in vitro recover the human primary granulosa lutein cell (hGLC) sub/poor-response?

SUMMARY ANSWER

A picomolar concentration of LH may recover the FSH-induced cAMP and progesterone production of hGLC from sub/poor-responder women.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Clinical studies suggested that FSH and LH co-treatment may be beneficial for the ovarian response of sub/poor-responders undergoing ovarian stimulation during ART.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

hGLC samples from 286 anonymous women undergoing oocyte retrieval for ART were collected from October 2017 to February 2021.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

hGLCs from women undergoing ovarian stimulation during ART were blindly purified, cultured, genotyped and treated in vitro by increasing concentrations of FSH (nM) ±0.5 nM LH. cAMP and progesterone levels produced after 3 and 24 h, respectively, were measured. In vitro data were stratified a posteriori, according to the donors' ovarian response, into normo-, sub- and poor-responder groups and statistically compared. The effects of LH addition to FSH were compared with those obtained by FSH alone in all the groups as well.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

hGLCs from normo-responders were shown to have higher sensitivity to FSH treatment than sub-/poor-responders in vitro. Equimolar FSH concentrations induced higher cAMP (about 2.5- to 4.2-fold), and progesterone plateau levels (1.2- to 2.1-fold), in cells from normo-responder women than those from sub-/poor-responders (ANOVA; P < 0.05). The addition of LH to the cell treatment significantly increased overall FSH efficacy, indicated by cAMP and progesterone levels, within all groups (P > 0.05). Interestingly, these in vitro endpoints, collected from the normo-responder group treated with FSH alone, were similar to those obtained in the sub-/poor-responder group under FSH + LH treatment. No different allele frequencies and FSH receptor (FSHR) gene expression levels between groups were found, excluding genetics of gonadotropin and their receptors as a factor linked to the normo-, sub- and poor-response. In conclusion, FSH elicits phenotype-specific ovarian lutein cell response. Most importantly, LH addition may fill the gap between cAMP and steroid production patterns between normo- and sub/poor-responders.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Although the number of experimental replicates is overall high for an in vitro study, clinical trials are required to demonstrate if the endpoints evaluated herein reflect parameters of successful ART. hGLC retrieved after ovarian stimulation may not fully reproduce the response to hormones of granulosa cells from the antral follicular stage.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

This in vitro assay may describe the individual response to personalize ART stimulation protocol, according to the normo-, sub- and poor-responder status. Moreover, this in vitro study supports the need to conduct optimally designed, randomized clinical trials exploring the personalized use of LH in assisted reproduction.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This study was supported by Merck KGaA. M.L. and C.C. are employees of Merck KGaA or of the affiliate Merck Serono SpA. Other authors have no competing interests to declare.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Use of a recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone:recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-hFSH:r-hLH) 2:1 combination for controlled ovarian stimulation during assisted reproductive technology treatment: A real-world study of routine practice in the Russian Federation

Two observational studies in the Russian Federation described patient demographics/clinical decision for treatment with recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone:recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-hFSH:r-hLH) 2:1 combination for ovarian stimulation (OS) during assisted reproductive technology (ART) and outcomes, respectively. The first (prospective) study enrolled 500 patients. After post-hoc regrouping to assign patients to discrete groups, 378 (75.6%) met the local Russian label for an r-hFSH:r-hLH 2:1 combination, 105 (21%) were treated according to other physician preference, and 17 (3.4%) met only the ESHRE Bologna criteria for a poor ovarian response. The clinical pregnancy rate per cycle was 30.4%. A total of 158/175 (90.3%) women achieving clinical pregnancy in the prospective study participated in the second (retrospective) study. The live birth rate per cycle was 25.8%. No new safety concerns were reported. These results support the use of the r-hFSH:r-hLH 2:1 combination in patients with a poor/suboptimal response to OS for ART treatment in the Russian Federation.

A retrospective, matched case-control study of recombinant LH versus hMG supplementation on FSH during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in the GnRH-antagonist protocol

Background

The role of luteinizing hormone (LH) in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) requires more evidence for its efficacy. Several studies compared recombinant human LH (r-hLH) or human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) in combination with recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (r-hFSH) but lack the results with GnRH-antagonist protocol and in Asians.

Methods

This is a retrospective, single-center study inspecting women receiving GnRH antagonist protocol and r-hFSH+hMG or r-hFSH+r-hLH regimen for over five days for COH in the in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycle in Taiwan from 2013 to 2018. The outcomes of IVF/ICSI cycles were analyzed after propensity score matching between the two groups. A subgroup analysis was conducted in cycles in which women underwent their first embryo transfer (ET), including fresh ET and frozen ET (FET).

Results

With a total of 503 cycles, the results revealed that the r-hFSH+r-hLH group performed better in terms of numbers of oocytes retrieved (r-hFSH+hMG vs. r-hFSH+r-hLH, 11.7 vs. 13.7, p=0.014), mature oocytes (8.7 vs. 10.9, p=0.001), and fertilized oocytes (8.3 vs. 9.8, p=0.022), while other outcomes were comparable. The analysis of first ET cycles also showed similar trends. Although the implantation rate (39% vs. 43%, p=0.37), pregnancy rate (52% vs. 53%, p=0.90), and live birth rate (39% vs. 45%, p=0.19) were not significantly different, the miscarriage rate was higher in the r-hFSH+hMG group than the r-hFSH+r-hLH group (26% vs. 15%, p<0.05) in first ET cycles. The cumulative pregnancy rate was significantly higher in the r-hFSH+r-hLH group (53% vs. 64%, p=0.02). No significant difference in rates of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) was observed.

Conclusion

The results support the hypothesis that the treatment of r-hLH+r-hFSH improves COH clinical outcomes in the IVF/ICSI cycle.

Ovarian Follicular Growth through Intermittent Vaginal Gonadotropin Administration in Diminished Ovarian Reserve Women

It is a challenge to obtain enough oocytes during in vitro fertilization (IVF) in women who have a poor ovarian response (POR) in achieving conception. We have adopted the characteristics of the first uterine pass effect, which we pioneered in employing the vaginal administration of gonadotropins in women receiving IVF treatments. In our previous study employing vaginal administration, faster absorption and slower elimination of gonadotropins were demonstrated, and, female subjects presented proper ovarian follicle growth and pregnancy rates. In this study, during 2016–2020, 300 to 675 IU of gonadotropins were administered vaginally every three days in 266 POR women for their controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH). The injections were performed with needles angled at 15–30° towards the middle-upper portions of the bilateral vaginal wall, with an injection depth of 1–2 mm. For the COH results, these women, on average, received 3.0 ± 0.9 vaginal injections and a total dose of 1318.4 ± 634.4 IU gonadotropins, resulting in 2.2 ± 1.9 mature oocytes and 1.0 ± 1.2 good embryos. Among these embryos, 0.9 ± 1.0 were transferred to reach a clinical pregnancy rate of 18.1% and a live birth rate of 16.7%. In conclusion, the intermittent vaginal administration of gonadotropins proved to be effective in POR women for their IVF treatments.

Luteinizing hormone supplementation in women with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism seeking fertility care: Insights from a narrative review

The management of infertile women affected by hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (HH) or conditions mimicking it is particularly challenging. In the present narrative review, we aimed to synthesize the available evidence on the benefit (if any) of exogenous luteinizing hormone (LH) supplementation in this group of patients. Available data support LH supplementation in women with organic or functional HH. On the contrary, the benefit of exogenous LH on reproductive outcomes both in advanced maternal age patients and in cases of depletion of FSH and LH levels induced by GnRH analogues has not been demonstrated. unfortunately, the inhomogeneous study populations as well as the methodological heterogeneity between studies focused on women affected by conditions mimicking HH do not allow reliable conclusions to be drawn.

A Randomized Controlled Trial on the Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose hCG in a Short Protocol with GnRH Agonist and Ovarian Stimulation with Recombinant FSH (rFSH) During the Follicular Phase in Infertile Women Undergoing ART

Τhis study aims to investigate whether the addition of low-dose hCG throughout stimulation in infertile women undergoing IVF improves IVF outcome parameters. This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase IIIb clinical study, conducted in three university IVF units. We studied whether the addition of 100 IU hCG/day to a short GnRH agonist IVF protocol from the onset of the follicular phase (group 1, n=40) or placebo (group 2, n=41) had any impact on the number of high-quality transferred embryos at day 2 and clinical pregnancy rates. The comparison encompassed descriptive statistics, and univariate and multivariate analyses. Concerning the primary outcomes, we found no differences in both the number of high-quality embryos (≥2) at day 3 [21/40 (52.5%) vs. 14/41 (34.2%), p=0.095] and clinical pregnancy rates [10/40 (25%) vs. 10/41 (24.4%), p=0.949], respectively. Similarly, there were no differences concerning the secondary outcomes preset for this trial. According to the results of the multivariate logistic regression analysis, no significant associations were noted for primary outcomes (clinical pregnancy: adjusted OR=0.89, 95% CI: 0.29–2.75; (≥2 excellent quality embryos at day 3: adjusted OR=0.54, 95% CI: 0.21–1.42, with group 1 set as reference category); similarly, no differences were noted with respect to secondary outcomes, except from the increased odds of ≥2 poor-quality embryos at day 3 occurring in group 2 (adjusted OR= 11.69, 95%CI: 1.29–106.19). The addition of low-dose hCG to a short GnRH agonist protocol for IVF does not improve the number of top-quality embryos and clinical pregnancy rates.

Effect of recombinant LH supplementation on cumulative live birth rate compared with FSH alone in poor ovarian responders: a large, real-world study

RESEARCH QUESTION

The benefit of LH supplementation (LHS) over sole use of FSH during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) remains controversial. Meta-analyses have provided some evidence that the benefit of LHS is limited to women with poor ovarian response (POR). This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of LHS on cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) in POR using a large controlled study in a real-world context.

DESIGN

This retrospective multicentre controlled study used data from registries at 12 French ART centres. All instances of POR undergoing ovarian stimulation and treated with follitrophin-alfa (FSH-α) with or without lutrophin-α were selected following an intention-to-treat principle. POR was defined according to the ESHRE Bologna criteria, and classified into three categories (Mild, Moderate and Severe) according to the Poor Responder Outcome Prediction (PROsPeR) score. The primary end-point was the CLBR associated with fresh and frozen embryos originating from the same ovarian stimulation.

RESULTS

A total of 9787 instances of ovarian stimulation (5218 LHS, 4569 FSH-α only) were analysed, 33.0%, 52.4% and 14.6% being allocated to the Mild, Moderate and Severe PROsPeR categories, respectively. Using a mixed logistic model and adjusting for matched subclasses and baseline POR severity, it was found that the benefit of LHS compared with use of FSH alone differed between baseline severity categories (interaction test, P = 0.007): a significant benefit of LHS for CLBR was found for patients in the Moderate (14.3% versus 11.3%, odds ratio [OR] = 1.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-1.75, risk ratio [RR] = 1.29, P = 0.013) and Severe (9.8% versus 4.4%, OR = 2.40, 95% CI- 1.48-3.89, RR = 1.89, P < 0.001) categories, but not for the Mild category (18.8% versus 19.6%, OR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.78-1.15, RR = 0.95, P = 0.60).

CONCLUSION

LHS has a significant effect on increasing CLBR in moderately and severely poor ovarian responders.

Comparison of the combination of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and recombinant luteinizing hormone protocol versus human menopausal gonadotropin protocol in controlled ovarian stimulation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the efficacy of a combination of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) and recombinant luteinizing hormone (rLH) protocol versus human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) protocol in controlled ovarian stimulation (COS).

METHODS

PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and WanFang Data were searched to collect studies published prior to January 2019 on the efficacy of rFSH combined with rLH versus hMG alone in COS. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, conducted the data extraction, and assessed the risk of bias for all selected studies. Then, Review Manager 5.3 software was used for the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

There were 2767 patients from 9 studies. The results showed that among patients aged >30 years for IUI, the combination of rFSH and rLH was superior to hMG alone in clinical pregnancy rate per patient (relative risk [RR] = 1.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02 to 2.12) and endometrial thickness (mean difference [MD] = 0.34, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.64). In patients over 30 years old who received IVF, the results tended to favor the combination of rFSH and rLH in clinical pregnancy rate per patient (RR = 4.48, 95% CI 1.15 to 17.46) and live birth rate per started cycle (RR = 1.69, 95% CI 1.96 to 2.71). In patients less than 30 years old who received IVF, the combination of rFSH and rLH was superior to hMG in the number of retrieved oocytes (MD = 3.70, 95% CI 3.27 to 4.13) and inferior to hMG in number of high-quality embryos (MD = -0.60, 95% CI -0.91 to -0.29).

CONCLUSION

The combination of rFSH and rLH may have better efficacy than hMG alone in COS. However, considering the limited sample size of the included studies, the current evidence is not definitive.

Human Recombinant FSH and Its Biosimilars: Clinical Efficacy, Safety, and Cost-Effectiveness in Controlled Ovarian Stimulation for In Vitro Fertilization

Exogenous human follicle-stimulating hormone (hFSH), either derived from extraction and purification from the urine or obtained by recombinant technology in the form of follitropin α, β and δ (rFSH), has been used for decades in the treatment of infertility. The main applications of FSH treatment in the woman have been, and still are, ovulation induction in oligo-anovulatory subjects, and stimulation of the development of a cohort of follicles in patients undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) for in vitro fertilization (IVF). In the last years, two biosimilars of follitropin alfa, rFSH compounds structurally and functionally similar to the originator, have been approved and marketed for clinical use in Europe. Moreover, some other rFSH biosimilars are currently under investigation. The objective of this article is to review the available evidences comparing the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of rFSH follitropin alpha originator with its biosimilars, discussing the clinical trials that allowed biosimilars to get registration and marketing authorization.

HMG versus recombinant FSH plus recombinant LH in ovarian stimulation for IVF: does the source of LH preparation matter?

Studies on the role of LH supplementation in patients undergoing assisted reproductive technique use different sources of LH bioactivity-containing preparations, daily doses and modes of administration. This review aims to critically present the available evidence comparing the effect of the two commercially available LH preparations (human menopausal gonadotrophin [HMG] and recombinant FSH + recombinant LH) with different sources of intrinsic LH bioactivity (HCG versus LH, respectively) on ovarian stimulation characteristics and IVF cycle outcomes. A literature review was conducted for all relevant articles reporting on IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment outcome after ovarian stimulation using HMG or recombinant FSH plus recombinant LH. The available studies are mostly observational, using different daily doses and modes of administration. No statistically significant differences were observed in ovarian stimulation variables and clinical pregnancy and live birth rates when HMG was compared with recombinant FSH + recombinant LH. Moreover, combined analysis of all the available prospective and retrospective studies produced no firm conclusions in favour of either source of LH bioactivity. Further large randomized controlled studies are needed to investigate the effect of the LH source on IVF outcome and to identify patients who are most likely to benefit from the addition of LH bioactivity supplementation.

Management Strategies for POSEIDON Groups 3 and 4

In the POSEIDON classification, patients belonging to groups 3 and 4 share the same common feature of a poor ovarian reserve which independently of age renders them at high risk of a poor reproductive outcome. Overall, POSEIDON groups 1-4 constitute approximately 47% of patients attending assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment. With the increasing delay in childbearing, POSEIDON group 4 seems to increase in numbers now in some centers constituting more than 50% of the total POSEIDON population, whereas group 3 patients constitute approximately 10%. Both POSEIDON groups 3 and 4 patients require special attention as regards pre-treatment strategy, ovarian stimulation, adjuvant treatment, and ovulation trigger strategy in order to optimize the probability of having at least one euploid blastocyst for transfer. Although more evidence is needed, recent advances seem to have increased the reproductive outcomes in the poor prognosis patient. The key to success is individualization in all steps of ART treatment. Herein, we review the recent evidence for the management of POSEIDON groups 3 and 4.