Feasibility and safety of uninterrupted apixaban in patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation

Incidence of silent cerebral events detected by MRI in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing pulsed field ablation vs thermal ablation: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia, and catheter ablation has been demonstrated to achieve superior success rates compared with antiarrhythmic drugs. However, this procedure entails certain risks, including silent cerebral events (SCEs), which may affect cognitive function. This network meta-analysis aimed to determine the global incidence of SCEs in patients with AF undergoing catheter ablation and to compare the incidence across energy sources and catheter types. Our analysis included 86 trials involving 10,456 patients with AF, with a pooled SCE incidence of 19.1%. For pulsed field ablation, the incidence of SCEs was 14.4%; thermal ablation techniques showed rates of 17.7% for radiofrequency ablation, 20.8% for cryoballoon ablation, and 32.7% for laser ablation. No significant differences were found between pulsed field ablation and thermal ablation in SCE incidence. The comparison of SCE incidence between different catheter types revealed variations. The HD Mesh Ablator demonstrated the lowest incidence rate (15.1%), whereas the PVAC catheter had the highest (36.2%). The Farawave catheter had an incidence rate of 18.5% and showed no significant differences compared with most thermal catheters, except for the HD Mesh Ablator (relative risk, 0.15; 95% credible interval, 0.03-0.89). Our findings indicate that a substantial proportion of patients experience SCEs after catheter ablation for AF, with an overall incidence of approximately 19.1% occurring within 1 week (mostly within 72 hours) after ablation. No significant differences were observed in SCE incidence between pulsed field ablation and thermal ablation or between the Farawave catheter and most thermal catheters.

Safety of Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Mechanical Prosthetic Valves

BACKGROUND

Catheter ablation (CA) for Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is increasingly utilized in the recent years, with promising results. We aimed to investigate the nationwide trends in utilization and procedural complications of CA for AF in patients with mechanical prosthetic valves (MPVs).

METHODS AND RESULTS

We drew data from the US National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database to identify cases of AF ablations in patients with MPVs, between 2003-2015. Sociodemographic and clinical data were collected, and incidence of procedural complications, mortality, and length of stay were analyzed. We compared the outcomes to a propensity matched cohort of patients without MPVs. The study included a weighted total of 1898 CA for AF cases in patients with MPVs. The median age of the study population was 67 (61-75) years and 53% were males. Despite the increasing age and significant uptrend in the prevalence of individual comorbidities and Deyo - Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) over the years, the risk of peri-procedural complications and mortality in the study group didn't change between the early (2003-2008) and late (2009-2015) study years. The peri-procedural complication rate (8.4% vs 10.4%, p=0.33) and in-hospital mortality (0.2% vs. 0.2%, p=0.9) did not differ significantly between patients with MPVs and 1901 matched patients without MPVs. Length of stay was higher among patients with prior MPVs compared to the controls (4.0±0.2 vs. 3.3±0.2 days, p=0.011).

CONCLUSION

This nationwide analysis shows that AF ablation in patients with mechanical valve prostheses bares similar risk of periprocedural complications and mortality as in patients without prosthetic valves. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Treatment strategies for patients with atrial fibrillation and chronic heart failure

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality and may lead to the development of chronic heart failure (CHF). Each condition predisposes to the other, requiring a careful choice of the treatment strategy. This article is devoted to the prevalence and prognostic implications of both diseases. The article presents data from meta-analyzes related to the management of this group of patients. The aspects of rhythm control strategy in AF and concomitant CHF are described according to the recent studies and clinical guidelines. The features of anticoagulant therapy in patients with AF and CHF are outlined. Much attention is given to the importance of the safety profile of the anticoagulant therapy in terms of the bleeding risk in patients with concomitant AF and CHF.

Meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants compared with warfarin in Japanese patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

OBJECTIVES

This meta-analysis was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) for perioperative anticoagulation of atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation (CA) in Japanese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched for articles published up to June 30, 2019. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of the included studies according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies with a total of 6827 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The experimental group received dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, or edoxaban; the control group received warfarin. The safety endpoints were bleeding complications; the efficacy endpoints were thromboembolic complications. Results were as follows: Patients with NOACs had a lower risk of overall bleeding complications (OR = 0.69, 95% CI (0.54, 0.87), P = 0.002), including major bleeding complications (OR = 0.52, 95% CI (0.32, 0.84), P = 0.007) and minor bleeding complications (OR = 0.73, 95% CI (0.56, 0.94), P = 0.02). There was no significant difference in thromboembolic complications between NOACs and warfarin after CA (OR = 0.39, 95% CI (0.14, 1.10), P = 0.08).

CONCLUSIONS

In Japanese NVAF patients undergoing CA, NOACs have similar effects to warfarin in the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism. Moreover, NOACs were associated with a lower incidence of bleeding complications.