Reducing radiation exposure in second-generation cryoballoon ablation without compromising clinical outcome

Systematic Workflow and Electrogram guidance to reduce X-ray Exposure Time during cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation: the SWEET-Cryo strategy

AIMS

Cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation (CB-PVI) offers similar efficacy to point-by-point radiofrequency PVI for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), but generally with higher X-ray exposure. Strategies aimed at reducing fluoroscopy mostly rely on other costly imaging techniques, limiting their applicability. We designed a Systematic Workflow and Electrogram guidance to reduce X-ray Exposure Time during CB-PVI (SWEET-Cryo) strategy and analysed its impact on fluoroscopy use and acute procedural and clinical outcomes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We enrolled 100 patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF undergoing CB-PVI by two operators with different levels of expertise. Patients treated with the SWEET-Cryo strategy (prospective cohort; n = 50) or conventional fluoroscopy (retrospective control cohort; n = 50) were compared. When applied by the senior operator, the SWEET-Cryo strategy significantly reduced the mean fluoroscopy time (FT) (2.6 ± 1.25 vs. 20.3 ± 10.8 min) and mean dose area product (DAP) (5.1 ± 3.8 vs. 35.3 ± 22.3 Gy cm2) compared with those of the control group, respectively (P < 0.001). Significant reductions in FT (6.4 ± 2.5 min vs. 32.5 ± 10.05) and DAP (13.9 ± 7.7 vs. 92.3 ± 63.8) were also achieved by the less experienced operator (P < 0.001). No difference was observed in acute and long-term complications or freedom from AF between fluoroscopy strategies during a 33-month median follow-up. Mean FT was maintained below 3 min in randomly selected cases performed during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

In contrast to conventional protocols and regardless of the operator's experience, the optimized SWEET-Cryo strategy dramatically reduced fluoroscopy exposure during CB-PVI. The efficacy, safety, or added costs of the ablation procedure were not compromised.

Radiation dose reduction in the setting of cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation: the value of optimized fluoroscopy settings and intracardiac echocardiography

Cryoballoon (CB) has proven to be very effective in the percutaneous treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). CB ablation is still hampered by X-ray exposure and the doses applied are consistently higher if compared to radiofrequency ablation. All patients who underwent CB ablation between 2015 and 2020 were analysed. Intracardiac echography was consistently used for transeptal puncture. To demonstrate the differences in radiation exposure 3 groups of 50 consecutive patients were selected. In the first group (G1) 3D rotational angiography (3DRA) was used as an intraprocedural imaging method. In the second group (G2), traditional X-ray imaging was used and frame rates both for fluoro and cine modes of diascopy were lowered. In the third group (G3) only 2-3 frames per second were used, cine mode was abandoned and the grid was removed from the X-ray detector. A total of 150 patients were included (76% males, mean age 57.3 ± 11.5 years). A dramatic reduction of radiation dose was obtained from 9585 ± 5610 µGy/m² in G1 to 2469 ± 2002 µGy/m² in G2 and finally 227.1 ± 360 µGy/m² in G3 (p < 0.0001). There was also a significant decrease of procedural and fluoroscopy times. No difference in major complications and midterm outcomes was found between the groups. By following a few relatively simple steps (omitting the pre-procedural imaging, removing grid from the X-ray detector and using very low frame rates) CB ablation could be performed with ultralow radiation exposure without compromising the safety of efficacy of the procedure.

Use of a novel integrated dilator-needle system in cryoballoon procedures: a zero-exchange approach

BACKGROUND

Recently, a novel integrated dilator-needle system (AcQCross Qx, Acutus Medical) was introduced to reduce the number of exchanges for a transseptal access. This system can be used in combination with large bore sheaths. In this pilot study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of a zero-exchange approach with the AcQCross system in cryoballoon procedures.

METHODS

In this retrospective single-center study, we included 40 patients (AcQCross: n = 20; control group: n = 20) who underwent a cryoballoon procedure for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. In the AcQCross and control group, patients underwent ablation with POLARx (Boston Scientific) and Arctic Front Advance Pro (AFA-Pro, Medtronic) in equal numbers (n = 10). In the AcQCross group, the AcQGuide Max sheath (Acutus Medical) was used in all POLARx cases.

RESULTS

The baseline characteristics of the study population were comparable between groups. In the AcQCross group, there was a reduction in procedure time (49.7 ± 9.0 min vs. 59.6 ± 8.1 min, P < 0.001) and time from puncture until balloon delivery (15.5 ± 6.8 min vs. 21.5 ± 7.4 min, P = 0.01) in comparison with the control group. The balloon in body time, fluoroscopy time, number of cryoapplications, and biophysical parameters were similar between groups. There was one temporary phrenic nerve injury in the AcQCross group. Importantly, no signs of air embolism were noted with the AcQGuide Max sheath.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the novel AcQCross system improves procedural efficacy in cryoballoon procedures by reducing the number of exchanges.

Radiofrequency vs. Cryoballoon vs. Thoracoscopic Surgical Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Single-Center Experience

Background and Objectives: Cryoballoon ablation (CBA) and totally thoracoscopic surgical ablation (TTA) have emerged as alternatives to radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for atrial fibrillation. In this study, we describe our experience comparing patient characteristics and outcomes of RFCA, CBA, and TTA. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from patients who underwent RFCA, CBA, or TTA. Both atrial fibrillation (AF)- and atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATa)-free survival rates were compared using time to recurrence after a 3-month blanking period (defined by a duration of more than 30 s). All patients were regularly followed using 12-lead ECGs or Holter ECG monitoring. Results: Of 354 patients in this study, 125 underwent RFCA, 97 underwent CBA and 131 underwent TTA. The TTA group had more patients with persistent AF, a larger LA diameter, and a history of stroke. The CBA group showed the shortest procedure time (p < 0.001). The CBA group showed significantly lower AF-free survival at 12 months than the RFCA and TTA groups (RFCA 84%, CBA 74% and TTA 85%, p = 0.071; p = 0.859 for TTA vs. RFCA, p = 0.038 for RFCA vs. CBA and p = 0.046 for TTA vs. CBA). There were no significant differences in ATa-free survival among the three groups (p = 0.270). There were no procedure-related adverse events in the RFCA group, but some complications occurred in the CBA group and the TTA group (6% and 5%, respectively). Conclusions: RFCA and CBA are effective and safe as first-line treatments for paroxysmal and persistent AF. In some high-risk stroke patients, TTA may be a viable option. It is important to consider patient characteristics when selecting an ablation method for AF.

A modified fluoroscopy protocol to minimize radiation exposure during pulmonary vein isolation with second-generation cryoballoon

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using second-generation cryoballoon (CB2) is considered to be safe and effective in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). Reported radiation exposure during PVI with CB2 is higher if compared with other technologies. We investigated acute and mid-term effects of a modified fluoroscopy protocol to minimize radiation exposure during CB2 PVI with regard to safety and efficacy.

METHODS

The study comprised 180 consecutive patients undergoing CB2 PVI. In the first 100 patients, PVI was performed using conventional fluoroscopy settings (group 1), while the following 80 patients (group 2) received PVI with a modified protocol. The protocol consisted of (a) general reduction of fluoroscopy frame rate to 3/s, (b) avoidance of cine runs and selective PV angiograms, and (c) enhanced radiation awareness. Retrospective data analysis was performed in respect to dose area product (DAP), fluoroscopy time, and freedom from AF during a 12-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Group 2 patients had lower DAP (426 ± 433 vs 3334 ± 2271 cGycm² ), fluoroscopy time (13.8 ± 6.3 vs 16.7 ± 5.6 minutes), LA dwell time (49.3 ± 15.5 vs 61.6 ± 16.2 minutes), and procedure time (85.5 ± 22.9 vs 94.9 ± 23.6 minutes); P < .01 for all. One-year freedom from AF was comparable between both groups (71% group 1 vs 73% group 2, ns).

CONCLUSION

Radiation exposure and procedure time during CB2 PVI can be significantly reduced by using a modified fluoroscopy protocol and increased radiation awareness without compromising acute and 1-year freedom from AF if performed by experienced operators.