Long-term neurocognitive function of pediatric patients with severe combined immune deficiency (SCID): pre- and post-hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT)

Parent Reports of Developmental Service Utilization After Newborn Screening

Newborn screening (NBS) presents an opportunity to identify a subset of babies at birth who are at risk for developmental delays and could benefit from a range of developmental services. Potential developmental services in the United States include Part C Early Intervention (EI), private therapies, and school-based services. Using parent-reported outcomes, this study examined the rates at which a sample of children diagnosed with NBS conditions used each developmental service. An online survey of 153 parents representing children with 27 different NBS conditions found that nearly 75% of children (n = 112) used at least one developmental service, with private therapies being the most frequent. Children were referred to EI relatively early and were often eligible because their medical diagnosis automatically qualified them. When examining condition-specific results for children with severe combined immunodeficiencies, congenital hypothyroidism, and Pompe disease, we found variability in rates of use, with high rates overall. Our findings suggest that many children diagnosed with an NBS condition continue to have developmental delays even after they receive appropriate medical care. Future research with more systematic follow-up is needed to understand whether the NBS program facilitates entry into these services and whether more streamlined processes could benefit children and families.

Newborn Screening Conditions: Early Intervention and Probability of Developmental Delay

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study is to explore which newborn screening (NBS) conditions are automatically eligible for early intervention (EI) across states and to determine the extent to which each disorder should automatically qualify for EI because of a high probability of developmental delay.

METHODS

We examined each state's EI eligibility policy and reviewed the literature documenting developmental outcomes for each NBS condition. Using a novel matrix, we assessed the risk of developmental delay, medical complexity, and risk of episodic decompensation, revising the matrix iteratively until reaching consensus. Three NBS conditions (biotinidase deficiency, severe combined immunodeficiency, and propionic acidemia) are presented in detail as examples.

RESULTS

Most states (88%) had Established Conditions lists to autoqualify children to EI. The average number of NBS conditions listed was 7.8 (range 0-34). Each condition appeared on average in 11.7 Established Conditions lists (range 2-29). After the literature review and consensus process, 29 conditions were likely to meet national criteria for an Established Condition.

CONCLUSION

Despite benefiting from NBS and timely treatment, many children diagnosed with NBS conditions are at risk for developmental delays and significant medical complexity. The results demonstrate a need for more clarity and guidance regarding which children should qualify for EI. We suggest that most NBS conditions should automatically qualify based on the probability of resulting in a developmental delay. These findings suggest a future opportunity for collaboration between NBS and EI programs to create a consistent set of Established Conditions, potentially expediate referrals of eligible children, and streamline children's access to EI services.

Cost and impact of early diagnosis in primary immunodeficiency disease: A literature review

BACKGROUND

New, innovative, costly diagnostic methods for patients with primary immunodeficiencies (PID) demand upfront insight into their potential cost savings and added value for individual patients. As such, high quality, comparable economic evaluations are of utmost importance to enable informed decisions. The objective of this review was therefore to create an extensive overview of current costing studies and potential cost savings of early diagnosis in primary immunodeficiency disease.

METHODS

A literature search in PubMed was conducted and studies involving any form of costing study in the field of PIDs were included. Of the included studies, study characteristics, cost parameters and benefits of early diagnosis were extracted and outlined in separate tables.

RESULTS

Twenty two studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. The papers were categorized according to their subject: neonatal screening for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID), Ig replacement therapies and studies reporting on costs of general or specific PIDs. Within and between these groups variability in reported costing characteristics was observed. In studies that reported cost savings pre- and post-diagnosis, cost savings ranged from 6500 to 108,463 USD of total costs per patient.

CONCLUSION

This literature review shows that, regardless of what aspect of PIDs has been studied, in nearly all cases early diagnosis reduces health care consumption and leads to better health outcomes for patients with PIDs. We found considerable variability in costing characteristics of economic evaluations of PID patients, which hampers the comparability of outcomes. More effort is needed to create uniformity and define cost parameters in economic evaluations in the field of PIDs, facilitating further prospective research to extensively assess the benefits of early diagnosis.

Neurocognitive dysfunction in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients: expert review from the late effects and Quality of Life Working Committee of the CIBMTR and complications and Quality of Life Working Party of the EBMT

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is a potentially curative treatment for children and adults with malignant and non-malignant diseases. Despite increasing survival rates, long-term morbidity following HCT is substantial. Neurocognitive dysfunction is a serious cause of morbidity, yet little is known about neurocognitive dysfunction following HCT. To address this gap, collaborative efforts of the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research and the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation undertook an expert review of neurocognitive dysfunction following HCT. In this review, we define what constitutes neurocognitive dysfunction, characterize its risk factors and sequelae, describe tools and methods to assess neurocognitive function in HCT recipients, and discuss possible interventions for HCT patients with this condition. This review aims to help clinicians understand the scope of this health-related problem, highlight its impact on well-being of survivors, and to help determine factors that may improve identification of patients at risk for declines in cognitive functioning after HCT. In particular, we review strategies for preventing and treating neurocognitive dysfunction in HCT patients. Lastly, we highlight the need for well-designed studies to develop and test interventions aimed at preventing and improving neurocognitive dysfunction and its sequelae following HCT.

Neurocognitive Dysfunction in Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients: Expert Review from the Late Effects and Quality of Life Working Committee of the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research and Complications and Quality of Life Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is a potentially curative treatment for children and adults with malignant and nonmalignant diseases. Despite increasing survival rates, long-term morbidity after HCT is substantial. Neurocognitive dysfunction is a serious cause of morbidity, yet little is known about neurocognitive dysfunction after HCT. To address this gap, collaborative efforts of the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research and the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation undertook an expert review of neurocognitive dysfunction after HCT. In this review we define what constitutes neurocognitive dysfunction, characterize its risk factors and sequelae, describe tools and methods to assess neurocognitive function in HCT recipients, and discuss possible interventions for HCT patients with this condition. This review aims to help clinicians understand the scope of this health-related problem, highlight its impact on well-being of survivors, and help determine factors that may improve identification of patients at risk for declines in cognitive functioning after HCT. In particular, we review strategies for preventing and treating neurocognitive dysfunction in HCT patients. Finally, we highlight the need for well-designed studies to develop and test interventions aimed at preventing and improving neurocognitive dysfunction and its sequelae after HCT.

Primary Immune Deficiency Treatment Consortium (PIDTC) update

The Primary Immune Deficiency Treatment Consortium (PIDTC) is a collaboration of 41 North American centers studying therapy for rare primary immune deficiency diseases (PIDs), including severe combined immune deficiency (SCID), Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome (WAS), and chronic granulomatous disease (CGD). An additional 3 European centers have partnered with the PIDTC to study CGD. Natural history protocols of the PIDTC analyze outcomes of treatment for rare PIDs in multicenter longitudinal retrospective, prospective, and cross-sectional studies. Since 2009, participating centers have enrolled more than 800 subjects on PIDTC protocols for SCID, and enrollment in the studies on WAS and CGD is underway. Four pilot projects have been funded, and 12 junior investigators have received fellowship awards. Important publications of the consortium describe the outcomes of hematopoietic cell transplantation for SCID during 2000-2009, diagnostic criteria for SCID, and the pilot project of newborn screening for SCID in the Navajo Nation. The PIDTC Annual Scientific Workshops provide an opportunity to strengthen collaborations with junior investigators, patient advocacy groups, and international colleagues. Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the Office of Rare Diseases Research, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, the PIDTC has recently received renewal for another 5 years. Here we review accomplishments of the group, projects underway, highlights of recent workshops, and challenges for the future.

Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Severe Combined Immunodeficiency

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is an effective approach for the treatment of severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID). However, SCID is not a homogeneous disease, and the treatment required for successful transplantation varies significantly between SCID subtypes and the degree of HLA mismatch between the best available donor and the patient. Recent studies are beginning to more clearly define this heterogeneity and how outcomes may vary. With a more detailed understanding of SCID, new approaches can be developed to maximize immune reconstitution, while minimizing acute and long-term toxicities associated with chemotherapy conditioning.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the leukodystrophies: a systematic review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to systematically review the literature on worldwide numbers of leukodystrophy patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) as well as the safety and efficacy of the procedure in this patient population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A PubMed and EMBASE search up to June 2012 was conducted with a manual search of references from relevant articles. Selected studies were evaluated using internationally accepted criteria. The effect estimates of HSCT upon survival in early-stage disease versus late-stage disease were compared.

RESULTS

One hundred and fifty-two studies qualified for inclusion and reported on a total of 689 patients. Study quality ranged from poor to good; no study was rated excellent. Small sample sizes limited most studies. Meta-analysis in a subset of larger studies indicates that transplantation in earlier stages of disease fairs better than in the late stages. Beyond survival, little longitudinal data on functional outcome is reported and neurological outcome is sparse.

CONCLUSION

Further studies are needed to determine the neurological outcome following HSCT in the leukodystrophies. HSCT in the early stages of cerebral disease is still recommended for select leukodystrophies.

Recommendations for live viral and bacterial vaccines in immunodeficient patients and their close contacts

The present uncertainty of which live viral or bacterial vaccines can be given to immunodeficient patients and the growing neglect of societal adherence to routine immunizations has prompted the Medical Advisory Committee of the Immune Deficiency Foundation to issue recommendations based on published literature and the collective experience of the committee members. These recommendations address the concern for immunodeficient patients acquiring infections from healthy subjects who have not been immunized or who are shedding live vaccine-derived viral or bacterial organisms. Such transmission of infectious agents can occur within the hospital, clinic, or home or at any public gathering. Collectively, we define this type of transmission as close-contact spread of infectious disease that is particularly relevant in patients with impaired immunity who might have an infection when exposed to subjects carrying vaccine-preventable infectious diseases or who have recently received a live vaccine. Immunodeficient patients who have received therapeutic hematopoietic stem transplantation are also at risk during the time when immune reconstitution is incomplete or while they are receiving immunosuppressive agents to prevent or treat graft-versus-host disease. This review recommends the general education of what is known about vaccine-preventable or vaccine-derived diseases being spread to immunodeficient patients at risk for close-contact spread of infection and describes the relative risks for a child with severe immunodeficiency. The review also recommends a balance between the need to protect vulnerable subjects and their social needs to integrate into society, attend school, and benefit from peer education.

A single-center study of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for primary immune deficiencies (PIDD)

PIDD are rare inherited disorders that can result in life-threatening infections. Allogeneic HSCT is the only cure for many primary immune deficiencies; however, the specific diseases and optimal type(s) of transplants are not clear. This study compares transplant outcomes in a large cohort with a relatively uniform pre- and post-transplant management strategies. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 39 pediatric patients who underwent HSCT for SCID (n = 25) or other immune deficiencies (n = 14) from 1986 to 2010. A structured case report form was used to collect clinical information. The outcomes of survival, immune reconstitution, engraftment, incidence of GvHD and IVIG dependency were tabulated. Overall survival rates were 88% for SCID and 86% for other primary immune deficiencies, which are high compared to other historical series. No single variable was associated with mortality. Immunoglobulin dependence occurred only in patients who had X-linked SCID and a parental donor haploidentical transplant. Because of improved supportive care and use of alternative donors and conditioning regimens, HSCT has become an acceptable option for an increasing number of PIDD subtypes not previously transplanted with high frequency. This study encourages greater use of transplantation.