In-line positioning of ultrasound images using wireless remote display system with tablet computer facilitates ultrasound-guided radial artery catheterization

Application of wireless ultrasound for guided caudal anesthesia in children undergoing concealed penis surgery

Caudal anesthesia alleviates the strong pain endured by children during surgical treatment for concealed penis. In the traditional method, anesthesiologists identify the puncture point using the 'blind probe' method, which leads to anesthesia induction failure in children. Ultrasound has recently gained wide attention for its guidance in peripheral nerve block analgesia. However, the clinical significance of wireless ultrasound - guided caudal anesthesia technology in children remains unexplored. This study investigated the clinical value of wireless ultrasound - guided caudal anesthesia in children undergoing concealed penis surgery. From April 2022 to August 2022, 120 pediatric patients aged 3-10 years were selected for concealed penis surgery. They were divided into the wireless ultrasound - guided sacral block group (group A) and the traditional sacral block group (group B), with 60 children in each group. Children in group A and group B underwent wireless ultrasound - guided caudal anesthesia and traditional caudal anesthesia, respectively. The success rates of the first puncture and total punctures, time taken for the punctures, and number of punctures were compared between the groups. The success rates of the first puncture (95% vs 68.3%) and total puncture (100% vs 90%) were significantly higher in group A than in group B (P<0.05). The average puncture time and the average number of punctures were, respectively, significantly shorter and lesser in group A than in group B (both P<0.05). Compared with the traditional method, wireless ultrasound visualization technology can effectively improve the success rate of sacral block puncture and reduce puncture time, which is worthy of clinical application.

The effect of smart glasses combined with ultrasound on radial arterial catheterization: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The integration of smart glasses with ultrasound technology offers a novel approach to improve the efficiency of radial arterial catheterization. Few studies have investigated the effectiveness of smart glasses in enhancing procedural outcomes in a clinical setting. This study aims to assess whether smart glasses combined with ultrasound can improve the initial success rate of radial artery catheterization compared to traditional ultrasound-guided methods in adults.

METHODS

This single-blinded, randomized controlled trial enrolled patients aged 18-70 with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-III, who required radial artery catheterization as part of their procedure under general anesthesia. Patients were randomized 1:1 into the ultrasound group and the smart glasses group. Radial arterial catheterization was carried out by one of six anesthesiologists before general anesthesia. The primary endpoint was the first puncture success rate. Secondary endpoints included hand-eye coordination (measured by head rotations, probe repositioning and needle redirections), operator's satisfaction.

RESULTS

A total of 222 patients were analyzed, with the smart glasses group demonstrating a higher rate of first puncture success compared to the control group (88.3% [98/111] vs. 72.1% [80/111]; P = 0.002; relative risk [RR], 1.23; 95% CI (1.07, 1.40)). Hand-eye coordination improved significantly in the smart glasses group than the control group, including: fewer number of head rotations (0 [0, 0] vs. 3 [2, 6]; P < 0.001); fewer number of ultrasound probe repositioning (0 [0, 0] vs. 0 [0, 1]; P < 0.001); fewer number of needle redirections (0 [0, 1] vs. 1 [0, 3]; P < 0.001). The proportion of positive satisfaction (81 to 100 points) in the smart glasses group was higher (89.2% [99/111] vs. 69.4% [77/111]; P <  0.001; RR, 1.29; 95% CI (1.12, 1.48)).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of smart glasses significantly improved the first puncture success rate, hand-eye coordination ability and operators' satisfaction in radial arterial catheterization.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered at Chictr.org.cn with the number ChiCTR2400081399 on 29/02/2024.

Laser guidance for ultrasound-guided radial artery catheterization using smart glasses: a randomized trial

PURPOSE

The use of smart glasses during ultrasound-guided needle procedures may reduce operators' head movements but has not been shown to improve procedural performance. Laser guidance has been shown to decrease the time required for ultrasound-guided procedures in phantom models but has not been tested clinically. We hypothesized that adding laser guidance to the use of smart glasses for ultrasound-guided radial artery catheterization using the long axis approach would improve performance by relatively inexperienced users unfamilar with these techniques.

METHODS

In an unblinded controlled trial, we enrolled 52 patients requiring radial artery catheterization under anesthesia, randomized into two groups: smart glasses only (SO) (control; N = 26) or smart glasses with laser guidance group (SL) (N = 26). We assessed catheterization time (primary outcome), the number of needle redirections, first-pass success rate, and operator satisfaction (100 = most satisfactory; 0 = unsatisfactory).

RESULTS

Comparing the SL with the SO group, catheterization time was shorter (median [interquartile range], 13 [9-20] sec vs 24 [18-46] sec, P < 0.001) and the number of needle redirections was lower (0 [0-1] vs 3 [1-3], P < 0.001) while the first-pass success rate (50% vs 12%, P = 0.007) and operator satisfaction score (85 [76-95] vs 52 [44-74], P < 0.001) were higher.

CONCLUSION

Laser guidance improved the performance of ultrasound-guided radial artery catheterization using smart glasses in users inexperienced in the long axis in-plane approach. Nevertheless, it is unclear whether these findings are clinically significant.

STUDY REGISTRATION DATE

CRIS.nih.go.kr (KCT0007168); registered 8 April 2022.

Preferred display size and visual distance for ultrasound-guided radial artery cannulation

Introduction: In-line positioning of an ultrasound image provides higher success rates and less time to completion for radial arterial cannulation. But preferable size and distance of ultrasound display has not been previously discussed. Objective: To assess the ideal visual distance and display size when using a smart phone or tablet as the ultrasound image display. Methods: Four smart phones or tablets were used as ultrasound displays in six different configurations in a simulated radial artery puncture. In a questionnaire, 116 anaesthesiologists working in Ibaraki Prefecture, Japan, were asked which of the six configurations was preferable for radial artery cannulation. Results: Sixty anaesthesiologists answered the questionnaire. About half (53%) preferred the smaller display (4- or 5.5-inch) fixed at a distance of 30 to 40 cm, and most of the rest (44%) preferred the larger display (7.9- or 9.7-inch) placed posterior to the probe with a visual distance of 45 to 60 cm. Conclusions: Among the anaesthesiologists, the preferable size and visual distance for ultrasound-guided radial artery cannulation varied using a smart phone or tablet for in-line display.

[Short-axis versus long-axis approach in ultrasound-guided central venous cannulation: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis]

OBJECTIVE

To compare the success rate and safety of the short-axis (SAX) approach and long- axis (LAX) approach to ultrasound-guided central venous cannulation.

METHODS

Electronic bibliographic databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Science Direct, and Web of Science were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing ultrasound-guided central venous cannulation via the LAX and SAX approaches published during the period from January, 2011 to October, 2017. We extracted the data from the eligible studies and assessed the first-attempt success rate, overall puncture success rate and complication rate of the two approaches. The relative risk (RR) with the 95% CI was calculated using a fixed or random effects model.

RESULTS

Seven randomized controlled trials were included for meta-analysis. The results showed that the first-attempt success rate was significantly higher in the SAX group than in the LAX group (RR=1.27, 95%CI: 1.11-1.46; P=0.0005, I²=49%), but the overall puncture success rate did not differ significantly between the two approaches (RR=1.04, 95%CI: 0.97-1.10; P=0.27, I²=84%). The incidence of accidental arterial puncture with the SAX approach was significantly lower than that with the LAX approach (RR=1.04; 95%CI: 1.01-1.08; P=0.01, I²=30%).

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound-guided central venous cannulation via the SAX approach, as compared with the LAX approach, can increase first-attempt success rate and reduce the incidence of accidental arterial puncture.

Accuracy and performance of a new handheld ultrasound machine with wireless system

We verified the accuracy and performance of a new handheld ultrasound machine, in comparison to a high-end sonographic machine. We performed bilateral measurements of the following tendon districts (supraspinatus, flexor of the middle finger, patellar and Achilles) and of the cross sectional area of the median nerve in 21 patients using a musculoskeletal ultrasound linear scanner of a handheld sonographic machine and a high-end sonographic machine. Two tail T test was used to evaluate whether there were differences in the measurements between the two sonographic machines. Agreement was evaluated by Pearson's correlation. The mean time requested for the examinations was 18 and 9 minutes for the handheld and high-end sonographic machines, respectively. No significant differences were found between the measurements obtained with the handheld ultrasound machine and those with the high-end sonographic machine (p value ranging between 0.31 and 0.97, according to the examined district), whereas, a moderate correlation was found (r coefficient ranging between 0.43 and 0.77, according to the examined district). Although the examination with the handheld ultrasound machine took more time, it showed adequate accuracy and performance; this palmar tool might be also useful in operating rooms.

Application of Optimized Ultrasonic Localization System for Radial Artery Puncture by Intern Doctors: A Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND Ultrasound with developing line may by suitable for medical personnel who are inexperienced in the use of ultrasound-guided radial artery puncture. In this trial, we assessed whether this technology could increase the success rate of radial artery puncture performed by interns. MATERIAL AND METHODS Seventy-seven patients undergoing general anesthesia were enrolled and randomly divided into 2 groups: an ultrasound with developing line group and a traditional ultrasound group. All radial artery punctures were performed by interns who received theoretical explanation (including video demonstration of puncture) and on-site guidance puncture once. The primary end-point was the success rate of cannulation at the first attempt and the secondary end-point was cannulation failure rate. RESULTS The success rate of cannulation at the first attempt in ultrasound in the developing line group was significantly higher than that in the traditional ultrasound group (proportion difference: 34.21%, 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.5483 to -0.1334; P=0.0025). However, no significant between-group difference was observed with respect to failure rate (mean difference 95% CI, (-0.0084 to 0.2743; P=0.0866). The ultrasonic location time in the ultrasound with developing line group was significantly lower than that in the traditional ultrasound group (mean difference -12.4 seconds, 95% CI, 10.64 to 13.98 s; P<0.0000). CONCLUSIONS Use of ultrasound with developing line significantly improved the success rate of radial artery puncture performed by interns as compared to that with use of traditional dynamic ultrasound guidance technology.

Ultrasound Versus Traditional Palpation to Guide Radial Artery Cannulation in Critically Ill Children: A Randomized Trial

OBJECTIVES

To identify success rates for radial artery cannulation in a pediatric critical care unit using either palpation or ultrasound guidance to cannulate the radial artery.

METHODS

A prospective randomized comparative study of critically ill children who required invasive monitoring in a tertiary referral center was conducted. All patients were randomized by a stratified block of 4 to either ultrasound-guided or traditional palpation radial artery cannulation. The primary outcomes were the first attempt and total success rates.

RESULTS

Eighty-four children were enrolled, with 43 randomized to the palpation technique and 41 to the ultrasound-guided technique. Demographic data between the groups were not significantly different. The total success and first attempt rates for the ultrasound-guided group were significantly higher than those for the palpation group (success ratio, 2.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-3.64; P = .018; and success ratio, 4.18; 95% confidence interval, 1.57-11.14; P = .004, respectively). The median time to success for the ultrasound-guided group was significantly shorter than that for the palpation group (3.3 versus 10.4 minutes; P < .001). Cannulation complications were lower in the ultrasound-guided group than the palpation group (12.5% versus 53.3%; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The ultrasound-guided technique could improve the success rate and allow for faster cannulation of radial artery catheterization in critically ill children.

Journal of clinical monitoring and computing 2016 end of year summary: anesthesia

Clinical monitoring and computing are essential during general anesthesia. As a result it would be impossible to review all the articles published in the Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing that are relevant to anesthesia. We therefore will limit this summary to those articles that are uniquely related to anesthesia. The topics include: anesthesia machines; ensuring the airway; anesthetic depth; neuromuscular transmission monitoring; locoregional anesthesia; ultrasound; and pain.