Issues Arising in Psychological Consultations to Help Parents Talk to Minor and Young Adult Children about their Cancer Genetic Test Result: a Guide to Providers

Adolescent and young adult cancers: unmet needs and closing the gaps

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There is a growing population of adolescent and young adult (AYA, ages 15-39 years) cancer patients and survivors, and the field of AYA oncology is rapidly evolving. Despite an increased focus on survival and quality of life for AYAs, gaps in knowledge remain. The current review focuses on what is known across several domains unique to AYA cancer care as well as areas of improvement and future directions in research and intervention.

RECENT FINDINGS

Due to the developmental stages included in the AYA age range, a cancer diagnosis and treatment can affect relationships, education and employment, finances, and long-term health differently than diagnoses in younger or older populations. Recent studies that have focused on these unique aspects of AYA cancer care, including health-related quality of life (HRQoL), fertility, financial toxicity, barriers to clinical trial enrollment, genetic predisposition, and survivorship care are included in the current review.

SUMMARY

Although studies have described many of the challenges faced by AYAs across the cancer continuum from diagnosis to survivorship, more work is needed, particularly in systematically measuring HRQoL, eliminating barriers to clinical trial enrollment, addressing financial toxicity, and increasing access to fertility preservation and high-quality survivorship care.

Helping young children understand inherited cancer predisposition syndromes using bibliotherapy

Communication with children about hereditary conditions in the family can be difficult for parents. Yet, good communication strategies are leading determinants of adaptation and resilience. With inherited cancer predisposition syndromes that can affect young children such as Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) and hereditary pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma syndrome (HPPS), genetic testing and subsequent surveillance in at-risk children is the optimal intervention. Given testing often commences early, providing children and their parents with appropriate genetic counseling and communication strategies is important for informed decision making. To inform such communication strategies, we used a bibliotherapeutic framework, where stories are delivered prescriptively (i.e., 'bibliotherapy'), to develop a psycho-educational resource for children aged 5-10 years old at risk of either LFS or HPPS. Illustrated storybooks for children were created based on models of developmental comprehension. To ascertain their experience, parents were invited to read a storybook to their child/ren and participate in semi-structured qualitative interviews. Transcripts were analyzed thematically using a general inductive approach. The bibliotherapeutic resource reportedly supported parents with communication about these issues without raising emotional distress in either themselves or their children. The key stages of a bibliotherapeutic interaction were facilitated by the use of this resource, and all parents reported that it would have been useful when their children were first tested and/or diagnosed. This study lays the foundation for the application of bibliotherapy as a psycho-educational intervention in genetic counseling and demonstrates that bibliotherapy may improve the process of communication between parents and children regarding pediatric-inherited cancer syndromes.

Impact of a Genetic Evaluation Initiative to Increase Access to Genetic Services for Adolescent and Young Adults at a Tertiary Cancer Hospital

Purpose: Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer are at increased risk for inherited cancer predisposition syndromes. Genetic counseling (GC) is important for accurate risk assessment, diagnosis, and management of inherited cancers. Numerous barriers prevent AYA access to genetic services. This study describes outcomes of a genetic evaluation initiative (GEI) regarding utilization of genetic services among AYAs. Methods: To improve AYA access to GC, the AYA program at UT MD Anderson Cancer Center implemented GEI, a process for identifying and referring eligible patients for GC. We collected retrospective electronic medical record data between July 12, 2018 and July 12, 2019 to capture AYA's clinical characteristics, genetic referral, scheduled appointments, counseling, testing, and results. Results: In total, 516 AYAs were referred to the AYA clinic during the study period with a median age of first cancer diagnosis of 17 years. One hundred sixty-six AYAs were identified who would benefit from genetic evaluation, 57 (34.3%) of whom had previously undergone counseling. One hundred nine patients were recommended for referral to GC, and 64.2% (70/109) were referred by the AYA team. To date, 58.6% (41/70) met with a genetic counselor and 75.6% (31/41) completed genetic testing, which yielded 1 pathogenic, 2 uncertain, and 29 benign results. Conclusion: The GEI resulted in a 72.0% relative increase in the rate of GC utilization and represents a novel approach to increasing AYA patient access to cancer genetic services in this population.

The Influence of Adolescence on Parents' Perspectives of Testing and Discussing Inherited Cancer Predisposition

Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) is a highly penetrant cancer predisposition syndrome that may present with a first cancer before or during adolescence/young adulthood. Families offered LFS genetic testing for their children can inform our understanding of how the unique developmental context of adolescence influences parental perspectives about genetic testing and discussions of cancer risk. In this study, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 46 parents of children at risk for LFS to capture those perspectives. Analysis utilized summary descriptive statistics and inductive qualitative content coding. Most parents (33/46; 72%) expressed beliefs that adolescence influences the importance of LFS testing and/or discussions about genetic risk. Twenty-six parents related this influence to cognitive, physical, and social changes occurring during adolescence. Aspects of adolescence perceived as promoting LFS testing/discussion included developmental appropriateness, risks of cancer in adolescence, need for medical screening decisions, influence on behaviors, transition to adult health care, and reproductive risks. Aspects of adolescence perceived as complicating LFS testing/discussions included potential negative emotional impact, misunderstanding, added burden, and negative impact on self-image or future planning. Parents recognize the complex influence that adolescence has on LFS testing and conversations surrounding results. Further research is needed to understand the actual impact of genetic testing on young people, and how to best support parents and adolescents within the broader context of heritable diseases.