1
|
Pellegrini CA, Wilcox S, DeVivo KE, Jamieson S. Recruitment and Retention Strategies for Underrepresented Populations and Adults With Arthritis in Behavioral Interventions: A Scoping Review. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2023; 75:1996-2010. [PMID: 36752353 DOI: 10.1002/acr.25098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2022] [Revised: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify strategies used to recruit and retain underrepresented populations and populations with arthritis or fibromyalgia (FM) into behavioral programs targeting exercise, physical activity, or chronic disease self management. METHODS Five bibliographic databases were searched for articles published between January 2000 and May 2022. The search focused on strategies and best practices for recruiting and retaining underrepresented populations or populations with arthritis or FM into disease self-management or physical activity/exercise programs. Abstracts and full-text articles were screened for inclusion by 2 independent reviewers, and 2 reviewers extracted data from included articles. RESULTS Of the 2,800 articles, a total of 43 publications (31 interventions, 8 reviews, 4 qualitative/descriptive studies) met criteria and were included. The majority of studies focused on physical activity/exercise (n = 36) and targeted African American (n = 17), Hispanic (n = 9), or arthritis populations (n = 7). Recruitment strategies that were frequently used included having race- or community-matched team members, flyers and information sessions in areas frequented by the population, targeted emails/mailings, and word of mouth referrals. Retention strategies used included having race- or community-matched team members, incentives, being flexible, and facilitating attendance. Most studies used multiple recruitment and retention strategies. CONCLUSION This scoping review highlights the importance of a multifaceted recruitment and retention plan for underrepresented populations and populations with arthritis or FM in behavioral intervention programs targeting exercise, physical activity, or chronic disease self management. Additional research is needed to better understand the individual effects of different strategies and the costs associated with the various recruitment/retention methods in underrepresented populations and populations with arthritis.
Collapse
|
2
|
Johnson E, Marsh L. Clinical research nurse utilisation and role in the conduct of decentralised clinical trials: a literature review. J Res Nurs 2023; 28:214-226. [PMID: 37332317 PMCID: PMC10272696 DOI: 10.1177/17449871231162497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The decentralised clinical trial (DCT) model has been popularised given its remote or virtual design, permitting expanded participant enrolment into community settings. Clinical research nurses (CRNs) are specially trained in the management of clinical trials; however, the utilisation of the research nurse role relating to decentralised trial conduct is not well-established. Aims A literature review was conducted to describe the role of the research nurse in the conduct of DCTs and the current utilisation of this nurse specialty for decentralised trial management. Methods Use of keywords 'DCT' or 'virtual trial' and 'nursing' were used to identify full-text, peer-reviewed literature in the English language and published within the last 10 years that described the clinical research nursing role. Results Of the 102 pre-screened articles identified across five databases, 11 articles were eligible for full-text analysis. Thematic groupings of common discussion elements included Variance in Decentralised Clinical Trial Model Implementation, CRN Involvement in Decentralised Trial Conduct and Reporting and Shared Challenges of Decentralised Trial Implementation Affecting the CRN Role. Conclusions Implications of this literature review include expanded trial sponsor awareness of the support requirements to facilitate research nurse utilisation and optimal decentralised trial conduct.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Johnson
- Assistant Professor, Mark & Robyn Jones College of Nursing, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA
| | - Lisa Marsh
- Adjunct Faculty, Buntain College of Nursing, Northwest University, Kirkland, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
O'Sullivan Greene E, Shiely F. Recording and reporting of recruitment strategies in trial protocols, registries, and publications was nonexistent. J Clin Epidemiol 2022; 152:248-256. [PMID: 36273772 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.10.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2022] [Revised: 09/27/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate how trialists record and report their recruitment strategies and the recruiter details in trial protocols, registries, and publications. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING A retrospective study of ovarian cancer (OC) trials between 2010 and 2021. We reviewed 154 trial publications, 30 protocols, 105 registry entries, and 26 trial websites associated with 88 phase III OC trials. RESULTS None of the 88 trials reviewed published a recruitment strategy or made reference to an available recruitment strategy for the trial. Only 31% (n = 28) made reference to the recruiter but this was reported only in the protocol so we have no evidence these named recruiters performed the task. None of the trials reviewed which closed early or extended recruitment timelines due to slow accrual, reported measures taken to improve recruitment rates before stoppages or changes took place. There were disparities in the reported target recruitment numbers between the protocol, the publication, and the registry. CONCLUSION Recruitment strategies exist, and we are sure most trial centers use recruitment strategies, but they need to be recorded and reported, as part of the supplementary material if not the main publication, so we can evaluate their effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Frances Shiely
- Trials Research and Methodologies Unit, HRB Clinical Research Facility, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland; School of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Salomon RE, Dobbins S, Harris C, Haeusslein L, Lin CX, Reeves K, Richoux S, Roussett G, Shin J, Dawson-Rose C. Antiracist symptom science: A call to action and path forward. Nurs Outlook 2022; 70:794-806. [PMID: 36400578 PMCID: PMC10916506 DOI: 10.1016/j.outlook.2022.07.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2022] [Revised: 07/29/2022] [Accepted: 07/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Nurse scientists recognize the experience of racism as a driving force behind health. However, symptom science, a pillar of nursing, has rarely considered contributions of racism. Our objective is to describe findings within symptom science research related to racial disparities and/or experiences of racism and to promote antiracist symptom science within nursing research. In this manuscript, we use an antiracist lens to review a predominant symptom science theory and literature in three areas of symptom science research-oncology, mental health, and perinatal health. Finally, we make recommendations for increasing antiracist research in symptom science by altering (a) research questions, (b) recruitment methods, (c) study design, (d) data analysis, and (e) dissemination of findings. Traditionally, symptom science focuses on individual level factors rather than broader contexts driving symptom experience and management. We urge symptom science researchers to embrace antiracism by designing research with the specific intent of dismantling racism at multiple levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca E Salomon
- The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
| | - Sarah Dobbins
- San Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, California
| | | | | | - Chen-Xi Lin
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Katie Reeves
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Sarah Richoux
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Greg Roussett
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Joosun Shin
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Farr DE, Battle DA, Hall MB. Using Facebook Advertisements for Women's Health Research: Methodology and Outcomes of an Observational Study. JMIR Form Res 2022; 6:e31759. [PMID: 35019843 PMCID: PMC8792890 DOI: 10.2196/31759] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2021] [Revised: 10/25/2021] [Accepted: 11/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recruitment of diverse populations for health research studies remains a challenge. The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated these challenges by limiting in-person recruitment efforts and placing additional demands on potential participants. Social media, through the use of Facebook advertisements, has the potential to address recruitment challenges. However, existing reports are inconsistent with regard to the success of this strategy. Additionally, limited information is available about processes that can be used to increase the diversity of study participants. OBJECTIVE A Qualtrics survey was fielded to ascertain women's knowledge of and health care experiences related to breast density. This paper describes the process of using Facebook advertisements for recruitment and the effectiveness of various advertisement strategies. METHODS Facebook advertisements were placed in 2 rounds between June and July 2020. During round 1, multiple combinations of headlines and interest terms were tested to determine the most cost-effective advertisement. The best performing advertisement was used in round 2 in combination with various strategies to enhance the diversity of the survey sample. Advertisement performance, cost, and survey respondent data were collected and examined. RESULTS In round 1, a total of 45 advertisements with 5 different headlines were placed, and the average cost per link click for each headline ranged from US $0.12 to US $0.79. Of the 164 women recruited in round 1, in total 91.62% were eligible to complete the survey. Advertisements used during recruitment in round 2 resulted in an average cost per link click of US $0.11. During the second round, 478 women attempted the survey, and 87.44% were eligible to participate. The majority of survey respondents were White (80.41%), over the age of 55 years (63.94%), and highly educated (63.71%). CONCLUSIONS Facebook advertisements can be used to recruit respondents for health research quickly, but this strategy may yield participants who are less racially diverse, more educated, and older than the general population. Researchers should consider recruiting participants through other methods in addition to creating Facebook advertisements targeting underrepresented populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deeonna E Farr
- Department of Health Education and Promotion, College of Health and Human Performance, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, United States
| | - Darian A Battle
- Department of Health Education and Promotion, College of Health and Human Performance, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, United States
| | - Marla B Hall
- Department of Public Health, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bodicoat DH, Routen AC, Willis A, Ekezie W, Gillies C, Lawson C, Yates T, Zaccardi F, Davies MJ, Khunti K. Promoting inclusion in clinical trials-a rapid review of the literature and recommendations for action. Trials 2021; 22:880. [PMID: 34863265 PMCID: PMC8643184 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05849-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2021] [Accepted: 11/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Without inclusion of diverse research participants, it is challenging to understand how study findings will translate into the real world. Despite this, a lack of inclusion of those from under-served groups in research is a prevailing problem due to multi-faceted barriers acting at multiple levels. Therefore, we rapidly reviewed international published literature, in relation to clinical trials, on barriers relating to inclusion, and evidence of approaches that are effective in overcoming these. Methods A rapid literature review was conducted searching PubMed for peer-reviewed articles that discussed barriers to inclusion or strategies to improve inclusion in clinical trial research published between 2010 and 2021. Grey literature articles were excluded. Results Seventy-two eligible articles were included. The main barriers identified were language and communication, lack of trust, access to trials, eligibility criteria, attitudes and beliefs, lack of knowledge around clinical trials, and logistical and practical issues. In relation to evidence-based strategies and enablers, two key themes arose: [1] a multi-faceted approach is essential [2]; no single strategy was universally effective either within or between trials. The key evidence-based strategies identified were cultural competency training, community partnerships, personalised approach, multilingual materials and staff, communication-specific strategies, increasing understanding and trust, and tackling logistical barriers. Conclusions Many of the barriers relating to inclusion are the same as those that impact trial design and healthcare delivery generally. However, the presentation of these barriers among different under-served groups may be unique to each population’s particular circumstances, background, and needs. Based on the literature, we make 15 recommendations that, if implemented, may help improve inclusion within clinical trials and clinical research more generally. The three main recommendations include improving cultural competency and sensitivity of all clinical trial staff through training and ongoing personal development, the need to establish a diverse community advisory panel for ongoing input into the research process, and increasing recruitment of staff from under-served groups. Implementation of these recommendations may help improve representation of under-served groups in clinical trials which would improve the external validity of associated findings. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-021-05849-7.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ash C Routen
- Centre for Ethnic Health Research, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK.,Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK
| | - Andrew Willis
- Centre for Ethnic Health Research, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK.,Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK
| | - Winifred Ekezie
- Centre for Ethnic Health Research, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK.,Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK
| | - Clare Gillies
- Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK
| | - Claire Lawson
- Leicester Real World Evidence Unit, Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK
| | - Thomas Yates
- Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK.,NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK
| | - Francesco Zaccardi
- Leicester Real World Evidence Unit, Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK
| | - Melanie J Davies
- Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK.,NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK.,Leicester Diabetes Centre, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
| | - Kamlesh Khunti
- Centre for Ethnic Health Research, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK. .,Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK. .,NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK. .,Leicester Real World Evidence Unit, Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Community-based Versus Traditional Research Among Older Minority Women With Urinary Incontinence. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2021; 28:201-206. [PMID: 34387261 DOI: 10.1097/spv.0000000000001089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate research retention of older minority women with urinary incontinence (UI) using a community-based participatory research (CBPR) versus a traditional research approach. METHODS An ancillary prospective study was conducted within an ongoing pilot randomized clinical trial to treat UI. Participants were recruited using CBPR in collaboration with a local community versus a traditional research approach at an academic center. Inclusion criteria were women 65 years and older and symptomatic UI. The primary outcome was the randomization rate defined as the proportion of women randomized into the randomized clinical trial out of screened participants. Screening and consent rates were also evaluated. Pearson χ2, Fisher exact, and t tests were used. The effect of CBPR on research retention rates was expressed as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS There were 10 and 88 women screened in the CBPR and traditional research groups, respectively. The CBPR participants were Hispanic (n = 10, 100%) and older (78.4 ± 8.3 years; P < 0.01). Most of the traditional research participants were non-Hispanic Black (n = 55, 62.5%) and younger (71.0 ± 4.9 years). The CBPR group had higher rates of screening (76.9% vs 40.6%; P = 0.01), consent (80% vs 44.3%; P = 0.045), and randomization (50.0% vs 14.8%; P < 0.01) compared with the traditional research group. Community-based participatory research increased the odds of research retention during screening (OR, 4.9; 95% CI, 1.3-18.2), consent (OR, 5.0; 95% CI, 1.0-25.0), and randomization (OR, 5.8; 95% CI, 1.5-22.7). CONCLUSION Compared with traditional research, CBPR yielded higher research retention among older minority women with UI in a clinical study.
Collapse
|
8
|
Babatunde OA, Arp Adams S, Truman S, Sercy E, Murphy AE, Khan S, Hurley TG, Wirth MD, Choi SK, Johnson H, Hebert JR. The impact of a randomized dietary and physical activity intervention on chronic inflammation among obese African-American women. Women Health 2020; 60:792-805. [PMID: 32248760 DOI: 10.1080/03630242.2020.1746950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Lifestyle interventions may reduce inflammation and lower breast cancer (BrCa) risk. This randomized trial assessed the impact of the Sistas Inspiring Sistas Through Activity and Support (SISTAS) study on plasma C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII). This unblinded, dietary and physical activity trial was implemented in 337 obese (body mass index [BMI] ≥30 kg/m2) African American (AA) women recruited between 2011 and 2015 in South Carolina through a community-based participatory approach with measurements at baseline, 3 months, and 12 months. Participants were randomized into either intervention (n = 176) or wait-list control group (n = 161). Linear mixed-effect models were used for analyses of CRP and IL-6. Baseline CRP was significantly higher in those with greater obesity, body fat percentage, and waist circumference (all p <.01). No difference was observed between groups for CRP or IL-6 at 3 or 12 months; however, improvements in diet were observed in the intervention group compared to the control group (p = .02) at 3 months but were not sustained at 12 months. Although the intervention was not successful at reducing levels of CRP or IL-6, a significant decrease was observed in DII score for the intervention group, indicating short-term positive dietary change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oluwole Adeyemi Babatunde
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of South Carolina , Columbia, South Carolina, USA.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina , Columbia, South Carolina, USA.,Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina , Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Swann Arp Adams
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of South Carolina , Columbia, South Carolina, USA.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina , Columbia, South Carolina, USA.,College of Nursing, University of South Carolina , Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | - Samantha Truman
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina , Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | - Erica Sercy
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of South Carolina , Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | - Angela E Murphy
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine, University of South Carolina , Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | - Samira Khan
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of South Carolina , Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | - Thomas G Hurley
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of South Carolina , Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | - Michael D Wirth
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of South Carolina , Columbia, South Carolina, USA.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina , Columbia, South Carolina, USA.,College of Nursing, University of South Carolina , Columbia, South Carolina, USA.,Connecting Health Innovations LLC , Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | - Seul Ki Choi
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of South Carolina , Columbia, South Carolina, USA.,Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina , Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | - Hiluv Johnson
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of South Carolina , Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | - James R Hebert
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of South Carolina , Columbia, South Carolina, USA.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina , Columbia, South Carolina, USA.,College of Nursing, University of South Carolina , Columbia, South Carolina, USA.,Connecting Health Innovations LLC , Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bevel M, Babatunde OA, Heiney SP, Brandt HM, Wirth MD, Hurley TG, Khan S, Johnson H, Wineglass CM, Warren TY, Murphy EA, Sercy E, Thomas AS, Hébert JR, Adams SA. Sistas Inspiring Sistas Through Activity and Support (SISTAS): Study Design and Demographics of Participants. Ethn Dis 2018; 28:75-84. [PMID: 29725191 DOI: 10.18865/ed.28.2.75] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Recruiting racial, ethnic, and other underserved minorities into conventional clinic-based and other trials is known to be challenging. The Sistas Inspiring Sistas Through Activity and Support (SISTAS) Program was a one-year randomized controlled trial (RCT) to promote physical activity and healthy eating among AA women in SC to reduce inflammatory biomarkers, which are linked to increased breast cancer (BrCa) risk and mortality. This study describes the development, recruitment, and implementation of the SISTAS clinical trial and provides baseline characteristics of the study participants. Methods SISTAS was developed using community-based participatory research (CBPR) approaches. At baseline, study participants completed assessments and underwent clinical measurements and blood draws to measure C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6). Participants randomized to the intervention received 12 weekly classes followed by nine monthly booster sessions. Post-intervention measurements were assessed at 12-week and 12-month follow-ups. Results We recruited a total of 337 women who tended to: be middle-aged (mean age 48.2 years); have some college education; be employed full-time; have Medicare as their primary insurance; be non-smokers; and perceive their personal health as good. On average, the women were pre-hypertensive at baseline (mean systolic blood pressure = 133.9 mm Hg; mean diastolic blood pressure = 84.0 mm Hg) and morbidly obese (mean BMI >40.0 kg/m2); the mean fat mass and fat-free mass among participants were 106.4 lb and 121.0 lb, respectively. Conclusion The SISTAS RCT addresses some of the gaps in the literature with respect to CBPR interventions targeting AA women, such as implementing diet and physical activity in CBPR-based studies to decrease BrCa risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malcolm Bevel
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina
| | - Oluwole A Babatunde
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina
| | - Sue P Heiney
- College of Nursing, University of South Carolina
| | - Heather M Brandt
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina.,Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina
| | - Michael D Wirth
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina
| | - Thomas G Hurley
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina
| | - Samira Khan
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina
| | - Hiluv Johnson
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina
| | - Cassandra M Wineglass
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina
| | - Tatiana Y Warren
- Community Works, Bon Secours Baltimore Health Systems; Baltimore, Maryland
| | - E Angela Murphy
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, School of Medicine, University of South Carolina
| | - Erica Sercy
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina
| | - Amanda S Thomas
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina
| | - James R Hébert
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina
| | - Swann Arp Adams
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina.,College of Nursing, University of South Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Babatunde OA, Adams SA, Wirth MD, Eberth JM, Sofge J, Choi SK, Harmon BE, Davis L, Drayton R, Hurley TG, Brandt HM, Armstead CA, Hébert JR. Predictors of Retention among African Americans in a Randomized Controlled Trial to Test the Healthy Eating and Active Living in the Spirit (HEALS) Intervention. Ethn Dis 2017; 27:265-272. [PMID: 28811738 DOI: 10.18865/ed.27.3.265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Retention of racial/ethnic minority groups into research trials is necessary to fully understand and address health disparities. This study was conducted to identify participants' characteristics associated with retention of African Americans (AAs) in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a behavioral intervention. METHODS Using data from an RCT conducted from 2009 to 2012 among AAs, participant-level factors were examined for associations with retention between three measurement points (ie, baseline, 3-month, and 12-month). Chi-square tests and logistic regression analyses were conducted to compare retained participants to those who were not retained in order to identify important predictors of retention. RESULTS About 57% of participants (n=238) were retained at 12 months. Baseline characteristics that showed a statistically significant association with retention status were age, marital status, body mass index (BMI), intervention group, enrollment of a partner in the study, and perceived stress score (PSS). Multivariable logistic regression that adjusted for age, BMI, and PSS showed the odds of being retained among participants who enrolled with a partner was 2.95 (95% CI: 1.87-4.65) compared with participants who had no study partner enrolled. The odds of being retained among participants who were obese and morbidly obese were .32 and .27 (95% CI: .14-.74 and .11-.69), respectively, compared with participants who had normal weight. CONCLUSION Having a partner enrolled in behavioral interventions may improve retention of study participants. Researchers also need to be cognizant of participants' obesity status and potentially target retention efforts toward these individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oluwole A Babatunde
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.,South Carolina Statewide Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC
| | - Swann Arp Adams
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.,College of Nursing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.,South Carolina Statewide Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC
| | - Michael D Wirth
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.,South Carolina Statewide Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.,Connecting Health Innovations LLC, Columbia, SC
| | - Jan M Eberth
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.,South Carolina Statewide Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC
| | - Jameson Sofge
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.,South Carolina Statewide Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC
| | - Seul Ki Choi
- South Carolina Statewide Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.,Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC
| | - Brook E Harmon
- South Carolina Statewide Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.,Division of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN
| | - Lisa Davis
- South Carolina Statewide Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC
| | - Ruby Drayton
- South Carolina Statewide Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC
| | - Thomas G Hurley
- South Carolina Statewide Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC
| | - Heather M Brandt
- South Carolina Statewide Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.,Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC
| | - Cheryl A Armstead
- South Carolina Statewide Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.,Department of Psychology, College of Arts and Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC
| | - James R Hébert
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.,South Carolina Statewide Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.,Connecting Health Innovations LLC, Columbia, SC.,Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hébert JR, Frongillo EA, Adams SA, Turner-McGrievy GM, Hurley TG, Miller DR, Ockene IS. Perspective: Randomized Controlled Trials Are Not a Panacea for Diet-Related Research. Adv Nutr 2016; 7:423-32. [PMID: 27184269 PMCID: PMC4863268 DOI: 10.3945/an.115.011023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Research into the role of diet in health faces a number of methodologic challenges in the choice of study design, measurement methods, and analytic options. Heavier reliance on randomized controlled trial (RCT) designs is suggested as a way to solve these challenges. We present and discuss 7 inherent and practical considerations with special relevance to RCTs designed to study diet: 1) the need for narrow focus; 2) the choice of subjects and exposures; 3) blinding of the intervention; 4) perceived asymmetry of treatment in relation to need; 5) temporal relations between dietary exposures and putative outcomes; 6) strict adherence to the intervention protocol, despite potential clinical counter-indications; and 7) the need to maintain methodologic rigor, including measuring diet carefully and frequently. Alternatives, including observational studies and adaptive intervention designs, are presented and discussed. Given high noise-to-signal ratios interjected by using inaccurate assessment methods in studies with weak or inappropriate study designs (including RCTs), it is conceivable and indeed likely that effects of diet are underestimated. No matter which designs are used, studies will require continued improvement in the assessment of dietary intake. As technology continues to improve, there is potential for enhanced accuracy and reduced user burden of dietary assessments that are applicable to a wide variety of study designs, including RCTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James R Hébert
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and
| | - Edward A Frongillo
- Health Promotion, Education and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health
| | - Swann A Adams
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and College of Nursing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC
| | | | | | - Donald R Miller
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA; Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Bedford Veterans Administration Medical Center, Bedford, MA; and
| | - Ira S Ockene
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA
| |
Collapse
|