1
|
Baeker Bispo JA, Goo I, Ashad-Bishop K, Kobetz E, Bailey Z. Does Neighborhood Social Cohesion Influence Participation in Routine Cancer Screening? Findings From a Representative Sample of Adults in South Florida. FAMILY & COMMUNITY HEALTH 2024; 47:130-140. [PMID: 38372330 DOI: 10.1097/fch.0000000000000400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Neighborhood social cohesion (NSC) has been associated with a variety of health outcomes, but limited research has examined its impact on behaviors that support cancer control. The purpose of this study was to examine associations between NSC and guideline-concordant breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening. METHODS Data are from a cross-sectional survey administered to 716 adults in South Florida from 2019 to 2020. The analytic samples included adults eligible for breast (n = 134), cervical (n = 195), and colorectal cancer (n = 265) screening. NSC was measured using a validated 5-item instrument. Associations between NSC and guideline-concordant screening were examined using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS In fully adjusted analyses, the odds of guideline-concordant breast cancer screening increased by 86% for every unit increase in NSC (aOR = 1.86; 95% CI, 1.03-3.36). NSC was not statistically significantly associated with guideline-concordant cervical cancer screening (aOR = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.54-1.38) or colorectal cancer screening (aOR = 1.29; 95% CI, 0.81-2.04). CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that NSC supports some screening behaviors, namely, mammography use. To better understand heterogeneous relationships between NSC and utilization of preventive care services such as cancer screening, more research is needed that disaggregates effects by sex, age, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordan A Baeker Bispo
- American Cancer Society, Surveillance and Health Equity Science, Atlanta, Georgia (Drs Baeker Bispo and Ashad-Bishop); Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida (Drs Goo and Kobetz); Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, Florida (Dr Kobetz); Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California (Dr Goo); and University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota (Dr Bailey)
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lozano P, Randal FT, Peters A, Aschebrook-Kilfoy B, Kibriya MG, Luo J, Shah S, Zakin P, Craver A, Stepniak L, Saulsberry L, Kupfer S, Lam H, Ahsan H, Kim KE. The impact of neighborhood disadvantage on colorectal cancer screening among African Americans in Chicago. Prev Med Rep 2023; 34:102235. [PMID: 37252073 PMCID: PMC10213351 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2022] [Revised: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Historically, colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates have been lower among African Americans. Previous studies that have examined the relationship between community characteristics and adherence to CRC screening have generally focused on a single community parameter, making it challenging to evaluate the overall impact of the social and built environment. In this study, we will estimate the overall effect of social and built environment and identify the most important community factors relevant to CRC screening. Data are from the Multiethnic Prevention and Surveillance Study (COMPASS), a longitudinal study among adults in Chicago, collected between May 2013 to March 2020. A total 2,836 African Americans completed the survey. Participants' addresses were geocoded and linked to seven community characteristics (i.e., community safety, community crime, household poverty, community unemployment, housing cost burden, housing vacancies, low food access). A structured questionnaire measured adherence to CRC screening. Weighted quantile sum (WQS) regression was used to evaluate the impact of community disadvantages on CRC screening. When analyzing all community characteristics as a mixture, overall community disadvantage was associated with less adherence to CRC screening even after controlling for individual-level factors. In the adjusted WQS model, unemployment was the most important community characteristic (37.6%), followed by community insecurity (26.1%) and severe housing cost burden (16.3%). Results from this study indicate that successful efforts to improve adherence to CRC screening rates should prioritize individuals living in communities with high rates of insecurity and low socioeconomic status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paula Lozano
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | | | - Briseis Aschebrook-Kilfoy
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Institute for Population and Precision Health, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Muhammad G. Kibriya
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Institute for Population and Precision Health, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jiajun Luo
- Institute for Population and Precision Health, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Sameep Shah
- Institute for Population and Precision Health, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Paul Zakin
- Institute for Population and Precision Health, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Andrew Craver
- Institute for Population and Precision Health, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Liz Stepniak
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Institute for Population and Precision Health, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Loren Saulsberry
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Sonia Kupfer
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Helen Lam
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Habibul Ahsan
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Institute for Population and Precision Health, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Karen E. Kim
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rollet Q, Tron L, De Mil R, Launoy G, Guillaume É. Contextual factors associated with cancer screening uptake: A systematic review of observational studies. Prev Med 2021; 150:106692. [PMID: 34166675 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2021] [Revised: 05/19/2021] [Accepted: 06/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
We conducted a systematic review of a wide range of contextual factors related to cancer screening uptake that have been studied so far. Studies were identified through PubMed and Web of Science databases. An operational definition of context was proposed, considering as contextual factors: social relations directly aimed at cancer screening, health care provider and facility characteristics, geographical/accessibility measures and aggregated measures at supra-individual level. We included 70 publications on breast, cervical and/or colorectal cancer screening from 42 countries, covering a data period of 24 years. A wide diversity of factors has been investigated in the literature so far. While several of them, as well as many interactions, were robustly associated with screening uptake (family, friends or provider recommendation, provider sex and experience, area-based socio-economic status…), others showed less consistency (ethnicity, urbanicity, travel time, healthcare density …). Screening inequities were not fully explained through adjustment for individual and contextual factors. Context, in its diversity, influences individual screening uptake and lots of contextual inequities in screening are commonly shared worldwide. However, there is a lack of frameworks, standards and definitions that are needed to better understand what context is, how it could modify individual behaviour and the ways of measuring and modifying it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Quentin Rollet
- U1086 "ANTICIPE" INSERM-University of Caen Normandie, Centre François Baclesse: 3, Avenue du Général Harris, 14000 Caen, France.
| | - Laure Tron
- U1086 "ANTICIPE" INSERM-University of Caen Normandie, Centre François Baclesse: 3, Avenue du Général Harris, 14000 Caen, France
| | - Rémy De Mil
- U1086 "ANTICIPE" INSERM-University of Caen Normandie, Centre François Baclesse: 3, Avenue du Général Harris, 14000 Caen, France
| | - Guy Launoy
- U1086 "ANTICIPE" INSERM-University of Caen Normandie, Centre François Baclesse: 3, Avenue du Général Harris, 14000 Caen, France
| | - Élodie Guillaume
- U1086 "ANTICIPE" INSERM-University of Caen Normandie, Centre François Baclesse: 3, Avenue du Général Harris, 14000 Caen, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Carbone JT, Clift J. Neighborhood social integration as a predictor of neighborhood perceptions. JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY 2021; 49:2179-2193. [PMID: 33655505 DOI: 10.1002/jcop.22536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2020] [Revised: 02/04/2021] [Accepted: 02/09/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
A growing body of literature has established a relationship between neighborhood perceptions and both physical and mental health outcomes, yet there remains a need to further explicate possible psychosocial factors that are predictive of neighborhood perceptions. This study hypothesized that an increase in social integration would result in more positive neighborhood perceptions. Propensity score matching on social integration was employed to strengthen the ability to draw a causal inference about the effect on neighborhood perceptions. When controlling for a range of sociodemographic covariates-including area deprivation index as a measure of objective neighborhood conditions-high social integration accounted for more than a 7% increase in neighborhood perceptions. The findings indicate the role of social integration as a predictor of neighborhood perceptions, revealing the potential importance of interventions and mechanisms aimed at improving neighborhood perceptions via social integration for the purposes of improving physical health and mental wellbeing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason T Carbone
- School of Social Work, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Jennifer Clift
- School of Social Work, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kelly TA, Kim S, Jemmott LS, Jemmott JB. Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Screening Among African American Men Living with HIV. J Community Health 2021; 46:1099-1106. [PMID: 33963984 DOI: 10.1007/s10900-021-00997-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
African American men living with HIV are at high risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). Screening to detect CRC is associated with a reduced risk of CRC mortality. However, little is known about CRC screening predictors in this population. This study examined the relation of self-efficacy, a potential mediator of screening that interventions could target, to CRC screening. It also investigated several variables that might identify subpopulations of African American men non-adherent to CRC screening recommendations. We report a secondary analysis on baseline data from a randomized controlled trial of a health promotion intervention for African American men living with HIV. Before their intervention, they completed measures of CRC screening, self-efficacy, marital status, age, education, and adherence to physical activity guidelines and were assessed for obesity. A total of 270 African American men aged 45 to 88 (Mean = 55.07; SD = 6.46) living with HIV participated. About 30% reported CRC screening in the past six months. Multiple logistic regression revealed greater CRC screening self-efficacy and meeting physical activity guidelines were associated with receiving CRC screening. Obese men and men reporting higher education were less likely to report screening. Age and marital status were unrelated to screening. The results of this study suggest CRC screening rates may be low among African American men living with HIV, and interventions targeting self-efficacy may improve their screening uptake. Moreover, public-health efforts to increase screening should prioritize interventions with subpopulations of African American men living with HIV who are physically inactive and obese.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Terri-Ann Kelly
- Rutgers University-Camden School of Nursing, 530 Federal Street, Office 448, Camden, NJ, 08102, USA.
| | | | - Loretta S Jemmott
- Drexel University College of Nursing and Health Professions, Philadelphia, USA
| | - John B Jemmott
- University Pennsylvania Annenberg School of Communication, Philadelphia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Maxwell AE, Lucas-Wright A, Chang LC, Santifer RE, Crespi CM. Factors associated with colorectal cancer screening in a peer-counseling intervention study in partnership with African American churches. Prev Med Rep 2020; 20:101280. [PMID: 33344150 PMCID: PMC7736973 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2020] [Revised: 11/23/2020] [Accepted: 12/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality is 47% higher in African American men and 34% higher in African American women compared to non-Hispanic white men and women. This analysis assessed factors associated with CRC screening among 163 African American participants of a peer-counseling intervention study (2016-2018). In a one-group pre/post-test pilot study, trained Community Health Advisors (CHAs) at 9 African American churches in Los Angeles (LA) promoted CRC screening via one-on-one counseling, print materials and telephone reminder calls. Participants completed telephone surveys 3-6 months after the intervention. We fit bivariate and multivariate mixed effects logistic regression models to assess correlates, including participants' demographic characteristics, access to care, cancer-related knowledge and attitudes and receipt of CHA counseling of (1) discussion of CRC screening with provider and (2) receipt of CRC screening during follow-up. After controlling for gender and education, receipt of CHA counseling (OR 3.77) was significantly associated with discussing CRC screening with a provider during follow-up but not with CRC screening. Instead, a routine check-up in the past 12 months (OR 4.47) and discussion of CRC screening with a provider (OR 3.07) were significantly associated with CRC screening during follow-up. Residence in South LA (OR 0.38) was significantly associated with lack of CRC screening. Findings confirm the important role of health care providers and suggest that residence in South LA constitutes an additional barrier to CRC screening. Further research and additional resources are needed to address disparities in the uptake of CRC screening among African Americans, especially in South LA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annette E. Maxwell
- Fielding School of Public Health and Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, UCLA Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Equity, University of California, Los Angeles, 650 Charles Young Drive South, Box 956900, Los Angeles, CA 90095-6900, USA
| | - Aziza Lucas-Wright
- Division of Cancer Research and Training, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, 1721 East 120th Street, Los Angeles, CA 90059, USA
| | - L. Cindy Chang
- Fielding School of Public Health and Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, UCLA Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Equity, University of California, Los Angeles, 650 Charles Young Drive South, Box 956900, Los Angeles, CA 90095-6900, USA
- Division of Cancer Research and Training, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, 1721 East 120th Street, Los Angeles, CA 90059, USA
| | - Rhonda E. Santifer
- Division of Cancer Research and Training, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, 1721 East 120th Street, Los Angeles, CA 90059, USA
| | - Catherine M. Crespi
- Fielding School of Public Health and Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, UCLA Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Equity, University of California, Los Angeles, 650 Charles Young Drive South, Box 956900, Los Angeles, CA 90095-6900, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Babatunde OA, Eberth JM, Felder T, Moran R, Truman S, Hebert JR, Zhang J, Adams SA. Social Determinants of Racial Disparities in Breast Cancer Mortality Among Black and White Women. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities 2020; 8:147-156. [PMID: 32385849 DOI: 10.1007/s40615-020-00766-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2019] [Revised: 04/09/2020] [Accepted: 04/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Mortality from breast cancer among Black women is 60% greater than that of White women in South Carolina (SC). The aim of this study was to assess racial differences in mortality among Black and White breast cancer patients based on variations in social determinants and access to state-based early detection programs. METHODS We obtained a retrospective record for breast cancer patients diagnosed between 2002 and 2010 from the SC Central Cancer Registry. Mortality was the main outcome while race-stratified Cox proportional hazard models were performed to assess disparities in mortality. We assessed effect modification, and we used an automated backward elimination process to obtain the best fitting models. RESULTS There were 3286 patients of which the majority were White women (2186, 66.52%). Compared with married White women, the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for mortality was greatest among Black unmarried women (aHR 2.31, CI 1.83, 2.91). Compared with White women who lived in the Low Country region mortality was greatest among Black women who lived in the Midland (aHR 2.17 CI 1.47, 3.21) and Upstate (aHR 2.96 CI 1.96, 2.49). Mortality was higher among Black women that were not receiving services in the Best Chance Network (BCN) program (aHR 1.70, CI 1.40, 2.04) compared with White women. CONCLUSIONS To reduce the racial disparity gap in survival in SC, Black breast cancer patients who live in the Upstate, are unmarried, and those that are not enrolled in the BCN program may benefit from more intense navigation efforts directed at early detection and linkage to breast cancer treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oluwole Adeyemi Babatunde
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA. .,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA. .,Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, 68 President Street, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
| | - Jan M Eberth
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA
| | - Tisha Felder
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.,College of Nursing, University of South Carolina, 1601 Greene Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA
| | - Robert Moran
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA
| | - Samantha Truman
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA
| | - James R Hebert
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.,College of Nursing, University of South Carolina, 1601 Greene Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.,Connecting Health Innovations LLC, 1417 Gregg Street, Columbia, SC, 29201, USA
| | - Jiajia Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA
| | - Swann Arp Adams
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.,College of Nursing, University of South Carolina, 1601 Greene Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Klasko-Foster LB, Jandorf LM, Erwin DO, Kiviniemi MT. Predicting Colonoscopy Screening Behavior and Future Screening Intentions for African Americans Older than 50 Years. Behav Med 2019; 45:221-230. [PMID: 30427773 PMCID: PMC6517076 DOI: 10.1080/08964289.2018.1510365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
African Americans experience a disproportionate burden of morbidity and mortality from colorectal cancer, which may be due to low adherence to screening recommendations. Previous studies have found relationships between decision-making factors and screening behavior, but few have looked at both cognitive and affective factors or within a specifically African American sample. To better understand determinants that drive screening behavior, this study examines affective, cognitive, and social variables as predictors of colonoscopy in an age-eligible African American population. Participants completed surveys assessing affective associations with colonoscopy, perceived benefits and barriers, self-efficacy, knowledge, fear of colonoscopy, perceived risk, and colorectal cancer worry and fear. Regression analysis was used to model decision-making constructs as predictors of screening behavior/intentions. Affective, cognitive, and health care experience variables predicted colonoscopy completion and intentions. Provider-level factors and previous cancer screenings predicted prior screening only, but not intentions. Affective and cognitive components of perceived risk were associated with decreased likelihood of colonoscopy behavior, but increased likelihood of colonoscopy intentions. These findings suggest that colonoscopy decision making involves a complex array of both cognitive and affective determinants. This work extends our knowledge of colorectal cancer screening decision making by evaluating the effects of these multiple determinants on screening behavior in an African American sample. Future work exploring the interplay of affect and cognitions as influences on colonoscopy decision making and how health care experiences may moderate this effect is needed to develop effective intervention approaches and reduce screening disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lynne B. Klasko-Foster
- University at Buffalo, SUNY, School of Public Health and Health Professions, Department of Community Health and Health Behavior, 3435 Main Street, 312 Kimball Tower, Buffalo, NY 14214
| | - Lina M. Jandorf
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1130, New York, NY, 10029,
| | - Deborah O. Erwin
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263,
| | - Marc T. Kiviniemi
- Department of Community Health and Health Behavior, University at Buffalo, SUNY, School of Public Health and Health Professions, 3435 Main Street, 314 Kimball Tower, Buffalo, NY 14214
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zhang J, Ye ZW, Townsend DM, Hughes-Halbert C, Tew KD. Racial disparities, cancer and response to oxidative stress. Adv Cancer Res 2019; 144:343-383. [PMID: 31349903 DOI: 10.1016/bs.acr.2019.03.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
At the intersection of genetics, biochemistry and behavioral sciences, there is a largely untapped opportunity to consider how ethnic and racial disparities contribute to individual sensitivity to reactive oxygen species and how these might influence susceptibility to various cancers and/or response to classical cancer treatment regimens that pervasively result in the formation of such chemical species. This chapter begins to explore these connections and builds a platform from which to consider how the disciplines can be strengthened further.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Zhang
- Department of Cell and Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.
| | - Zhi-Wei Ye
- Department of Cell and Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Danyelle M Townsend
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Chanita Hughes-Halbert
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States; Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Kenneth D Tew
- Department of Cell and Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Blair A, Gauvin L, Ouédraogo S, Datta GD. Area-level income disparities in colorectal screening in Canada: evidence to inform future surveillance. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019; 26:e128-e137. [PMID: 31043818 DOI: 10.3747/co.26.4279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Background Participation in colorectal screening remains low even in countries with universal health coverage. Area-level determinants of low screening participation in Canada remain poorly understood. Methods We assessed the association between area-level income and two indicators of colorectal screening (having never been screened, having not been screened recently) by linking census-derived local area-level income data with self-reported screening data from urban-dwelling respondents to the Canadian Community Health Survey (50-75 years of age, cycles 2005 and 2007, n = 18,362) who reported no known risk factors for colorectal cancer. Generalized estimating equation Poisson models estimated the prevalence ratios and differences for having never been screened and having not been screened recently, adjusting for individual-level income, education, marital status, having a regular physician, age, and sex. Results About 53% of the study population had never been screened. Among individuals who had ever been screened, 35% had been screened recently. Adjusting for covariates, lower area-level income was associated with having never been screened [covariate-adjusted prevalence ratios: 1.24 for quartile 1; 95% confidence limits (cl): 1.16, 1.34; 1.25 for quartile 2; 95% cl: 1.15, 1.33; 1.15 for quartile 3; 95% cl: 1.08, 1.23]. Among individuals who had been screened in their lifetime, area-level income was not associated with having not been screened recently. Conclusions Lower area-level income is associated with having never been screened for colorectal cancer even after adjusting for individual socioeconomic factors. Those findings highlight the potential importance of socioeconomic contexts for colorectal screening initiation and merit attention in both future research and surveillance efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Blair
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, École de Santé Publique de l'Université de Montréal Montreal, QC.,Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC
| | - L Gauvin
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, École de Santé Publique de l'Université de Montréal Montreal, QC.,Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC
| | - S Ouédraogo
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, École de Santé Publique de l'Université de Montréal Montreal, QC.,Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC
| | - G D Datta
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, École de Santé Publique de l'Université de Montréal Montreal, QC.,Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Shiue I. Caregivers had neighbourhood support but perceived it unsatisfactory and worsened: England Community Life Survey, 2012-2014. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2017; 24:10900-10905. [PMID: 28283982 PMCID: PMC5389993 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-8701-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2015] [Accepted: 02/27/2017] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
There has been limited research studying neighbourhood support for caregivers. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the support from neighbourhoods between both caregivers and non-caregivers in a country-wide and population-based setting. Data were retrieved from England Community Life Survey, 2012-2014, a new annual household survey conducted by face-to-face interview since 2012, with a representative sample size of 5-6000 adult (aged 16 years and over) resident per year in England. Chi-square test and logistic regression modelling were performed to examine the variance in support from and perception toward neighbourhoods between caregivers and non-caregivers. Of 15,320 study participants, 2315 (16.0%) had a caring responsibility. There was not much variance in feeling belonging, comfortably asking neighbours to keep keys, comfortably asking neighbours to mind children, believing neighbours pulling together and trusting people in the neighbourhood between caregivers and non-caregivers. However, caregivers seemed to be more likely to chat to neighbours (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.69-0.87, P < 0.001) and comfortably ask neighbours to help collect grocery (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81-0.98, P = 0.023). In addition, caregivers tended to perceive their neighbourhoods unsatisfactory (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.05-1.32, P = 0.007) and worsened in the last 2 years (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.22-1.51, P < 0.001). For future research, a longitudinal neighbourhood monitoring surveillance for all people would be suggested. For practice and policy, environmental health and nursing programs might need to extend education trainings and interventions to cover all neighbourhoods at different time points that can lessen both disease and caregiving burden and therefore optimize health and quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivy Shiue
- Department of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, England, NE7 7XA, UK.
- Alzheimer Scotland Dementia Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Peterson EB, Ostroff JS, DuHamel KN, D'Agostino TA, Hernandez M, Canzona MR, Bylund CL. Impact of provider-patient communication on cancer screening adherence: A systematic review. Prev Med 2016; 93:96-105. [PMID: 27687535 PMCID: PMC5518612 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.09.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 163] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2016] [Revised: 09/17/2016] [Accepted: 09/25/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Cancer screening is critical for early detection and a lack of screening is associated with late-stage diagnosis and lower survival rates. The goal of this review was to analyze studies that focused on the role of provider-patient communication in screening behavior for cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer. A comprehensive search was conducted in four online databases between 1992 and 2016. Studies were included when the provider being studied was a primary care provider and the communication was face-to-face. The search resulted in 3252 records for review and 35 articles were included in the review. Studies were divided into three categories: studies comparing recommendation status to screening compliance; studies examining the relationship between communication quality and screening behavior; and intervention studies that used provider communication to improve screening behavior. There is overwhelming evidence that provider recommendation significantly improves screening rates. Studies examining quality of communication are heterogeneous in method, operationalization and results, but suggest giving information and shared decision making had a significant relationship with screening behavior. Intervention studies were similarly heterogeneous and showed positive results of communication interventions on screening behavior. Overall, results suggest that provider recommendation is necessary but not sufficient for optimal adherence to cancer screening guidelines. Quality studies suggest that provider-patient communication is more nuanced than just a simple recommendation. Discussions surrounding the recommendation may have an important bearing on a person's decision to get screened. Research needs to move beyond studies examining recommendations and adherence and focus more on the relationship between communication quality and screening adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily B Peterson
- George Mason University, 4400 University Drive, MSN 3D6, Fairfax, VA 22031, United States.
| | - Jamie S Ostroff
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 641 Lexington Ave, 7th Floor, New York, NY 10022, United States
| | - Katherine N DuHamel
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 641 Lexington Ave, 7th Floor, New York, NY 10022, United States
| | - Thomas A D'Agostino
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 641 Lexington Ave, 7th Floor, New York, NY 10022, United States
| | - Marisol Hernandez
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 641 Lexington Ave, 7th Floor, New York, NY 10022, United States
| | - Mollie R Canzona
- Wake Forest University, P.O. Box 7347, Winston-Salem, NC 27109, United States; Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Blvd, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, United States
| | - Carma L Bylund
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 641 Lexington Ave, 7th Floor, New York, NY 10022, United States; Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar; Weill Cornell Medicine, Doha, Qatar
| |
Collapse
|