1
|
Aiming at inclusive workplaces: A bibliometric and interpretive review at the crossroads of disability management and human resource management. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT & ORGANIZATION 2023. [DOI: 10.1017/jmo.2023.4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Inclusive workplaces rely on the joint optimization of disability management and human resource management. However, disability management has been predominantly investigated as an independent issue, overlooking its interplay with human resource management. The article delivers a bibliometric and interpretive review of the scholarly debate falling at the crossroad of disability management and human resource management, mapping the state of the art of this study domain. Departing from a knowledge core of 91 papers, 6 research streams were identified through bibliographic coupling. They account for the evolution of disability management from a fix-it initiative aimed at fostering return to work of people with disability towards a holistic management approach targeted at inclusiveness. Aligning the hard and the soft sides of disability management and embedding it in the organizational culture are crucial to enact inclusive workplaces and make organizations able to engage people with disability at work.
Collapse
|
2
|
Main CJ, Shaw WS, Nicholas MK, Linton SJ. System-level efforts to address pain-related workplace challenges. Pain 2022; 163:1425-1431. [PMID: 35195550 PMCID: PMC9341230 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2021] [Revised: 11/01/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Chris J. Main
- Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, United Kingdom
| | - William S. Shaw
- Department of Medicine, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, United States
| | - Michael K. Nicholas
- Pain Management Research Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Steven J. Linton
- Department of Law, Psychology, and Social Work, Orebro University, Orebro, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dias P, Lopes S, Peixoto R. Mastering new technologies: does it relate to teleworkers’ (in)voluntariness and well-being? JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT 2022. [DOI: 10.1108/jkm-01-2021-0003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Purpose
This study aims to examine the associations among mastering new technologies, teleworkers’ voluntariness and involuntariness and employee well-being (i.e. work engagement and exhaustion). To the best of the authors’ knowledge, no studies have explored the relationships among these constructs in the same conceptual model.
Design/methodology/approach
Data were collected from a sample of 451 individuals performing telework in Portugal. AMOS was used to test all hypotheses of the study.
Findings
The findings showed a positive relationship between mastering new technologies and teleworkers’ voluntariness and a negative relationship between mastering new technologies and teleworkers’ involuntariness. However, contrary to expectations, voluntariness in teleworking was not significantly related to either work engagement or exhaustion. However, consistent with the theoretical background of self-determination theory, involuntariness in teleworking was negatively related to work engagement and positively related to exhaustion.
Originality/value
This study contributes to the literature by addressing the analysis of telework-related variables that may impact workers’ well-being. Implications for human resource management policies and knowledge management are discussed.
Collapse
|
4
|
Côté D, Durant S, MacEachen E, Majowicz S, Meyer S, Huynh A, Laberge M, Dubé J. A rapid scoping review of COVID-19 and vulnerable workers: Intersecting occupational and public health issues. Am J Ind Med 2021; 64:551-566. [PMID: 34003502 PMCID: PMC8212119 DOI: 10.1002/ajim.23256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2021] [Revised: 05/06/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This article reports the results of a rapid scoping review of the literature on COVID-19 transmission risk to workers in essential sectors such as retail, health care, manufacturing, and agriculture, and more particularly the experiences of workers in precarious employment and social situations. METHODS Following scoping review methods, we included 30 studies that varied in terms of methodology and theoretical approaches. The search included peer-reviewed articles and grey literature published between March and September 2020. RESULTS Based on the studies reviewed, we found that COVID-19 infection and death rates increased not only with age and comorbidities, but also with discrimination and structural inequities based on racism and sexism. Racial and ethnic minority workers, including migrant workers, are concentrated in high-risk occupations and this concentration is correlated to lower socioeconomic conditions. The COVID-19 pandemic appears in the occupational health and safety spotlight as an exacerbator of already existing socioeconomic inequalities and social inequalities in health, especially in light of the intersection of issues related to racism, ethnic minority status, and sexism. CONCLUSIONS This review provides early evidence about the limitations of institutions' responses to the pandemic, and their capacity to provide a safe and decent working environment for all workers, regardless of their employment status or the social protections they may enjoy under normal circumstances. It is also important to think about these issues in the postpandemic context, when conditions of precariousness and vulnerability persist and possibly worsen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Côté
- Institut de recherche Robert‐Sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travail (IRSST), MontréalQuébecCanada
- Department of AnthropologyUniversité de Montréal, MontréalQuébecCanada
| | - Steve Durant
- School of Public Health and Health SystemsUniversity of WaterlooOntarioCanada
| | - Ellen MacEachen
- School of Public Health and Health SystemsUniversity of WaterlooOntarioCanada
| | - Shannon Majowicz
- School of Public Health and Health SystemsUniversity of WaterlooOntarioCanada
| | - Samantha Meyer
- School of Public Health and Health SystemsUniversity of WaterlooOntarioCanada
| | - Ai‐Thuy Huynh
- Institut de recherche Robert‐Sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travail (IRSST), MontréalQuébecCanada
| | - Marie Laberge
- School of RehabilitationUniversité de MontréalQuébecCanada
| | - Jessica Dubé
- Institut de recherche Robert‐Sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travail (IRSST), MontréalQuébecCanada
- School of ManagementUniversité du Québec à Montréal (UQAM)QuébecCanada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Employer perspectives concerning the self-management support needs of workers with long-term health conditions. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WORKPLACE HEALTH MANAGEMENT 2021. [DOI: 10.1108/ijwhm-02-2021-0030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PurposeLong-term health conditions are a significant occupational and global burden and can undermine people's ability to work. Workplace support for self-management of long-term conditions has the potential to minimise adverse work effects, by enhancing health and work outcomes. No data exist about employers' views concerning supporting workers with long-term conditions to self-manage.Design/methodology/approachThe exploration of employers' views involved recruiting 15 participants with responsibilities for workplace health, well-being and safety responsibilities, who participated in a semi-structured interview about self-management and support. Data were analysed using a qualitative six-stage thematic analysis technique.FindingsSelf-management support is not purposely provided to workers with long-term conditions. Support in any form rests on workers disclosing a condition and on their relationship with their line-manager. While employers have considerable control over people's ability to self-manage, they consider that workers are responsible for self-management at work. Stigma, work demands and line-manager behaviours are potential obstacles to workers' self-management and support.Practical implicationsWorkplace discussions about self-managing long-term conditions at work should be encouraged and opened up, to improve health and work outcomes and aligned with return-to-work and rehabilitation approaches. A wider biopsychosocial culture could help ensure workplaces are regarded as settings in which long-term conditions can be self-managed.Originality/valueThis study highlights that employer self-management support is not provided to workers with long-term conditions in a purposeful way. Workplace support depends on an employer knowing what needs to be supported which, in turn, depends on aspects of disclosure, stigma, work demands and line management.
Collapse
|
6
|
Khodadadi-Hassankiadeh N, Rad E, Woldemichae A, Monsef-Kasamei V. Time of return to work and associated factors in rib fracture victims. ARCHIVES OF TRAUMA RESEARCH 2021. [DOI: 10.4103/atr.atr_53_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
7
|
Greidanus MA, de Boer AGEM, de Rijk AE, Frings-Dresen MHW, Tamminga SJ. The MiLES intervention targeting employers to promote successful return to work of employees with cancer: design of a pilot randomised controlled trial. Trials 2020; 21:363. [PMID: 32345344 PMCID: PMC7189583 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-04288-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2019] [Accepted: 03/28/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Employers express a need for support to facilitate the return to work (RTW) process of employees with cancer. We have developed the MiLES intervention, an online toolbox targeting employers during the RTW of employees with cancer. To evaluate the MiLES intervention, we propose the design of a pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT). The aim of this pilot is to determine whether a future RCT to study the effectiveness of this intervention on successful RTW of employees with cancer is feasible. Secondary aims are to obtain preliminary results on the effectiveness of the intervention and to determine the sample size needed in a future definitive RCT. METHODS A pilot RCT with a 6-month follow-up will be conducted. Using medical specialists at Dutch hospitals, we aim to enrol 90 participants diagnosed with cancer (<2 years earlier) aged 18-63 years who are in paid employment with an employer and who are currently sick-listed or partly sick-listed for <1 year. Participants randomised to the intervention group will be asked to inform their employer about the online toolbox supporting employers during the RTW process of employees with cancer. Participants in the control group will receive 'care as usual' from their employer. All measures will be assessed at the level of the employee using questionnaires at baseline and after 3 and 6 months of follow-up. The feasibility of a future RCT will be determined using criteria concerning method-related uncertainties and acceptability of the study protocol. The primary effect measure will be successful RTW (that is, RTW perceived as being successful by the cancer survivor themselves). This effect measure will be used to perform the sample size calculation for a future definitive RCT. DISCUSSION The design is proposed to determine the feasibility to study the effectiveness of the MiLES intervention targeting employers on the successful RTW of employees diagnosed with cancer. This pilot RCT can increase the probability of a successful future definitive RCT on the effectiveness of the intervention and potentially obviate the need to carry out an unfeasible and resource-intensive study. TRIAL REGISTRATION Dutch Trial Register (NTR): NL6758, NTR7627. Registered on 30 October 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michiel A Greidanus
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Angela G E M de Boer
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Angelique E de Rijk
- Department of Social Medicine, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Research Institute Primary Care and Public Health (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Duboisdomein 30, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Monique H W Frings-Dresen
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sietske J Tamminga
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Igeltjørn A, Habib L. Homebased Telework as a Tool for Inclusion? A Literature Review of Telework, Disabilities and Work-Life Balance. UNIVERSAL ACCESS IN HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION. APPLICATIONS AND PRACTICE 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-49108-6_30] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
|
9
|
Fassier JB, Sarnin P, Rouat S, Péron J, Kok G, Letrilliart L, Lamort-Bouché M. Interventions Developed with the Intervention Mapping Protocol in Work Disability Prevention: A Systematic Review of the Literature. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION 2019; 29:11-24. [PMID: 29948471 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-018-9776-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Purposes Intervention mapping (IM) is a protocol for developing effective behavior change interventions. It has been used for 10 years to develop work disability prevention (WDP) interventions, but it is not known to what extent and with what success. The main objective of this study was to review the effectiveness of these interventions. Secondary objectives were to review their fidelity to the IM protocol, their theoretical frameworks and their content. Methods A search strategy was conducted in MEDLINE, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Pascal, Francis, and BDSP. All titles and abstracts were reviewed. A standardized extraction form was developed. All included studies were reviewed by two reviewers blinded to each other. Results Eight WDP interventions were identified aimed at return to work (RTW; n = 6) and self-management at work (n = 2). RTW interventions targeted workers with stress-related mental disorders (n = 1), low back pain (n = 1), musculoskeletal disorders (n = 1), cancer (n = 2) and gynecological surgery (n = 1). The fidelity to the IM protocol was weaker for the participatory planning group. Matrices of change, change methods, and applications were systematically reported. The main theoretical frameworks used were the attitude-social influence-self efficacy model (n = 4) and the theory of planned behavior (n = 2). Half of the interventions included a workplace component (n = 4). Two interventions were reported as effective, and one partially effective. Conclusion The IM protocol is used in WDP since 2007. The participative dimension appears underused. Few theoretical frameworks were used. Implications are to better consider the stakeholders involvement, and mobilize theoretical frameworks with greater attempts to intervene on the work environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J B Fassier
- Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Unité mixte de recherche Epidémiologique et de Surveillance Transport Travail Environnement, UMRESTTE UMR T 9405, 8 Avenue Rockefeller, 69008, Lyon, France.
- Hospices civils de Lyon, service de médecine et santé au travail, Lyon, France.
| | - P Sarnin
- Univ Lyon, Université Lumière Lyon 2, GREPS - EA 4163 (Groupe de recherche en psychologie sociale), Lyon, France
| | - S Rouat
- Univ Lyon, Université Lumière Lyon 2, GREPS - EA 4163 (Groupe de recherche en psychologie sociale), Lyon, France
| | - J Péron
- Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive LBBE - UMR 5558, Lyon, France
- Service d'oncologie médicale. Institut de Cancérologie des Hospices Civils de Lyon (IC-HCL), Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - G Kok
- Department of Work and Social Psychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - L Letrilliart
- Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Health Services and Performance Research, HESPER Université Lyon 2, Lyon, France
- Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Collège Universitaire de médecine générale, 8 Avenue Rockefeller, 69008, Lyon, France
| | - M Lamort-Bouché
- Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Unité mixte de recherche Epidémiologique et de Surveillance Transport Travail Environnement, UMRESTTE UMR T 9405, 8 Avenue Rockefeller, 69008, Lyon, France
- Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Collège Universitaire de médecine générale, 8 Avenue Rockefeller, 69008, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Schur L, Han K, Kim A, Ameri M, Blanck P, Kruse D. Disability at Work: A Look Back and Forward. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION 2017; 27:482-497. [PMID: 29110160 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-017-9739-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
Purpose This article presents new evidence on employment barriers and workplace disparities facing employees with disabilities, linking the disparities to employee attitudes. Methods Analyses use the 2006 General Social Survey to connect disability to workplace disparities and attitudes in a structural equation model. Results Compared to employees without disabilities, those with disabilities report: lower pay levels, job security, and flexibility; more negative treatment by management; and, lower job satisfaction but similar organizational commitment and turnover intention. The lower satisfaction is mediated by lower job security, less job flexibility, and more negative views of management and co-worker relations. Conclusion Prior research and the present findings show that people with disabilities experience employment disparities that limit their income, security, and overall quality of work life. Technology plays an increasingly important role in decreasing employment disparities. However, there also should be increased targeted efforts by government, employers, insurers, occupational rehabilitation providers, and disability groups to address workplace barriers faced by employees with disabilities, and by those with disabilities seeking to return to work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Andrea Kim
- School of Business, Sungkyunkwan University, #33515 Business Bldg. 25-2, Sungkyunkwan-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03063, South Korea.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Blanck P, Adya M. Future Directions in Employment, Occupational Rehabilitation, and Disability: Introduction to the Special Section. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION 2017; 27:479-481. [PMID: 29127545 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-017-9741-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Purpose From an array of disciplinary perspectives, the articles in this special section examine opportunities and challenges in the economic, social, and civic participation of individuals across the spectrum of disabilities. Methods At multiple levels of analysis, the contributors consider employment law and policy frameworks, occupational and vocational rehabilitation strategies, and corporate practices in support of the full and equal inclusion of people with disabilities in society. Results and Conclusions The implications for policymakers, public and private sector stakeholders, and occupational rehabilitation professional are presented to help inform future policies, practices, and strategies to improve employment outcomes for people with disabilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Blanck
- Burton Blatt Institute, Syracuse University, 900 South Crouse Avenue, Suite 300, Syracuse, NY, 13244, USA.
| | - Meera Adya
- Burton Blatt Institute, Syracuse University, 900 South Crouse Avenue, Suite 300, Syracuse, NY, 13244, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Greidanus M, de Boer A, de Rijk A, Tiedtke C, Dierckx de Casterlé B, Frings-Dresen M, Tamminga S. Perceived employer-related barriers and facilitators for work participation of cancer survivors: A systematic review of employers' and survivors' perspectives. Psychooncology 2017; 27:725-733. [DOI: 10.1002/pon.4514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2017] [Revised: 07/21/2017] [Accepted: 07/25/2017] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- M.A. Greidanus
- Academic Medical Center; University of Amsterdam, Department: Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute; Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - A.G.E.M. de Boer
- Academic Medical Center; University of Amsterdam, Department: Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute; Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - A.E. de Rijk
- Department of Social Medicine, Research Institute Primary Care and Public Health (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine, and Life Sciences; Maastricht University; Maastricht The Netherlands
| | - C.M. Tiedtke
- Department of Social Medicine, Research Institute Primary Care and Public Health (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine, and Life Sciences; Maastricht University; Maastricht The Netherlands
| | - B. Dierckx de Casterlé
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Academic Center for Nursing and Midwifery; Katholieke Universiteit Leuven; Leuven Belgium
| | - M.H.W. Frings-Dresen
- Academic Medical Center; University of Amsterdam, Department: Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute; Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - S.J. Tamminga
- Academic Medical Center; University of Amsterdam, Department: Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute; Amsterdam The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Shaw WS, Main CJ, Pransky G, Nicholas MK, Anema JR, Linton SJ. Employer Policies and Practices to Manage and Prevent Disability: Foreword to the Special Issue. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION 2016; 26:394-398. [PMID: 27562584 PMCID: PMC5104772 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-016-9658-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
Purpose Employer policies and practices have been shown to impact workplace disability, but research in this area has waned in recent years despite an aging workforce, a growing prevalence of chronic health conditions, and a larger proportion of working-age adults on permanent work disability in many jurisdictions. The purpose of this article is to describe the background rationale and methodology for an invited conference designed to improve research of employer strategies to curtail work disability. Methods A multidisciplinary team of 26 international researchers with published research in employer-based disability management or related fields were invited to attend a 3-day conference in Hopkinton, Massachusetts, USA. The overall goal was to review the status of current research of workplace disability management and prevention, examine its relevance for employer decision-making, compare conceptual frameworks or theoretical perspectives, and recommend future research directions. Working groups were organized and draft manuscripts were prepared in advance. Conference activities included working group presentations and critiques, discussions with a panel of industry consultants and advisors, group interaction and debate, generation of final recommendations, and manuscript revision. Results/Conclusion Six principal domains were established with respect to future research: (a) further elucidation of the key workplace factors that buffer the disabling effects of injury and illness; (b) more innovative and feasible options for workplace intervention; (c) measurement of workplace-relevant disability outcomes; (d) a stronger theoretical framework for understanding the factors behind employer uptake and implementation; (e) a focus on special clinical populations and occupations where disability risk is most troubling; and (f) better representation of workers and employers that reflect the diverse and changing nature of work. Final comments and recommendations of the working groups are presented in the following six articles in this special issue of the Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. Conference attendees recommended changes in methodology, collaboration strategies, and theoretical perspectives to improve the practical and scientific impact of future research of employer practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William S Shaw
- Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety, 71 Frankland Road, Hopkinton, MA, 01748, USA.
- University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
| | - Chris J Main
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care Sciences and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK
| | - Glenn Pransky
- Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety, 71 Frankland Road, Hopkinton, MA, 01748, USA
- University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Michael K Nicholas
- Pain Management Research Institute, University of Sydney at Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Johannes R Anema
- EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Steven J Linton
- CHAMP, School of Law, Psychology and Social Work, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Main CJ, Shaw WS. Employer Policies and Practices to Manage and Prevent Disability: Conclusion to the Special Issue. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION 2016; 26:490-498. [PMID: 27475446 PMCID: PMC5104791 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-016-9655-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
Purpose Research of employer policies and practices to manage and prevent disability spans many disciplines and perspectives, and there are many challenges related to stakeholder collaboration, data access, and interventions. The purpose of this article is to synthesize the findings from a conference and year-long collaboration among a group of invited researchers intended to spur new research innovations in this field. Methods A multidisciplinary team of 26 international researchers with published research in employer-based disability management or related fields were invited to attend a 3-day conference in Hopkinton, Massachusetts, USA. The conference goals were to review the status of current research of workplace disability management and prevention, examine its relevance for employer decision-making, compare conceptual frameworks or theoretical perspectives, and recommend future research directions. In this paper, we summarize key points from the 6 resulting papers, compare them with an earlier 2005 conference on improving return-to-work research, and conclude with recommendations for further overarching research directions. Results/Conclusion In comparison with the 2005 conference, a greater emphasis was placed on organizational and social factors, employer roles and responsibilities, methods of implementation, non-clinical approaches, and facilitating stay-at-work as well as return-to-work. A special panel of employer consultants and representatives who were featured at the 2015 conference reinforced the importance of organizational culture, leadership style, and financial decision-making strategies at the employer level. Based on the conference proceedings, we recommend that future research in this area should strive for: (a) broader inclusion of workers and workplaces; (b) attention to multilevel influences in the workplace;
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chris J Main
- Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Room 1.56, Keele University, Keele, N. Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK.
| | - William S Shaw
- Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety, Hopkinton, MA, USA
- University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|