1
|
Lin YC, Yu MM. Evaluating the efficiency of Taiwan's compulsory education system: A dynamic network DEA approach incorporating dropout impacts. EVALUATION AND PROGRAM PLANNING 2025; 111:102588. [PMID: 40345111 DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2024] [Revised: 03/15/2025] [Accepted: 03/15/2025] [Indexed: 05/11/2025]
Abstract
This study aims to dynamically assess the production efficiency of Taiwan's compulsory education system from 2012 to 2022 by extending the network data envelopment analysis (NDEA) model into a dynamic framework. The proposed model integrates intertemporal carry-over variables and bad outputs (such as student dropouts) to address inefficiencies beyond the static input-output framework. Using the directional distance function (DDF) approach, we distinguish between retrieved and non-retrieved dropouts, emphasizing the long-term impact of non-retrieved dropouts as a carry-over variable. The empirical analysis evaluates performance disparities among various local governments and examines the influence of different local governments on overall and stage-specific educational performance. Our findings provide insights into the efficiency changes in Taiwan's compulsory education system, offering valuable guidance for policymakers to improve system performance. Additionally, this study contributes to the literature by introducing a refined dynamic NDEA framework that better captures the complexities of educational inefficiencies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Chun Lin
- Center for Teacher Education, Tamkang University, No.151, Yingzhuan Road, Tamsui Dist., New Taipei City 25137, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Ming-Miin Yu
- Department of Transportation Science, National Taiwan Ocean University, No.2, Pei-Ning Road, Keelung 202-24, Taiwan, ROC.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Watkins JM, Greeven SJ, Heeter KN, Brunnemer JE, Otile J, Solá PAF, Dutta S, Hobson JM, Evanovich JM, Coble CJ, Werner NE, Martinez Kercher VM, Kercher KA. Human-centered participatory co-design with children and adults for a prototype lifestyle intervention and implementation strategy in a rural middle school. BMC Public Health 2024; 24:845. [PMID: 38504193 PMCID: PMC10949632 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-18351-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/21/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The significance of regular physical activity (PA) in reducing cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk is widely acknowledged. However, children in rural areas encounter specific barriers to PA compared to their urban counterparts. This study employs human-centered participatory co-design, involving community stakeholders in developing a multi-level PA intervention named Hoosier Sport. The primary hypothesis is the co-design sessions leading to the development of a testable intervention protocol. METHODS Two co-design teams, each consisting of six children and six adults, were formed using human-centered participatory co-design facilitated by research faculty and graduate students. The process involved five co-design sessions addressing problem identification, solution generation, solution evaluation, operationalization, and prototype evaluation. Thematic analysis was employed to identify key themes and intervention components. RESULTS Child co-designers (n = 6) ranged from 6th to 8th grade, averaging 12.6 years (SD = 1.8), while adult co-designers (n = 6) averaged 43.3 years (SD = 8.08). Thematic analysis revealed children emphasizing autonomy, the freedom to choose physical and non-physical activities, and the importance of building peer relationships during PA. Adult interviews echoed the importance of autonomy and choice in activities, with a focus on relatedness through positive role modeling. CONCLUSION The prototype intervention and implementation strategies developed constitute a testable intervention aligned with Phase 1 of the ORBIT model. This testable prototype lays the groundwork for a collaborative campus-community partnership between the university and the local community, ensuring mutual benefits and sustainable impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janette M Watkins
- Department of Kinesiology, School of Public Health-Bloomington, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
- Program in Neuroscience, College of Arts and Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
| | - Sarah J Greeven
- Department of Kinesiology, School of Public Health-Bloomington, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
| | - Kathleen N Heeter
- Department of Applied Health Science, School of Public Health-Bloomington, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
| | - Julia E Brunnemer
- Department of Health & Wellness Design, School of Public Health-Bloomington, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
| | - Jacob Otile
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Public Health-Bloomington, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
| | - Paola A Fernández Solá
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Public Health-Bloomington, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
| | - Sandeep Dutta
- Neag School of Education, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
| | | | | | - Cassandra J Coble
- Department of Kinesiology, School of Public Health-Bloomington, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
| | - Nicole E Werner
- Department of Health & Wellness Design, School of Public Health-Bloomington, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
| | - Vanessa M Martinez Kercher
- Department of Health & Wellness Design, School of Public Health-Bloomington, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
| | - Kyle A Kercher
- Department of Kinesiology, School of Public Health-Bloomington, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Factors that sustain indigenous youth mentoring programs: a qualitative systematic review. BMC Public Health 2023; 23:429. [PMID: 36879214 PMCID: PMC9987150 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-15253-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Indigenous youth worldwide continue to experience disproportional rates of poorer mental health and well-being compared to non-Indigenous youth. Mentoring has been known to establish favorable outcomes in many areas of health but is still in its early phases of research within Indigenous contexts. This paper explores the barriers and facilitators of Indigenous youth mentoring programs to improve mental health outcomes and provides evidence for governments' response to the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. METHODS A systematic search for published studies was conducted on PubMed, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, and grey literature through Trove, OpenGrey, Indigenous HealthInfoNet, and Informit Indigenous Collection. All papers included in the search were peer-reviewed and published from 2007 to 2021. The Joanna Briggs Institute approaches to critical appraisal, data extraction, data synthesis, and confidence of findings were used. RESULTS A total of eight papers describing six mentoring programs were included in this review; six papers were from Canada, and two originated from Australia. Studies included mentor perspectives (n = 4) (incorporating views of parents, carers, Aboriginal assistant teachers, Indigenous program facilitators, young adult health leaders, and community Elders), mentee perspectives (n = 1), and both mentor and mentee perspectives (n = 3). Programs were conducted nationally (n = 3) or within specific local Indigenous communities (n = 3) with varying mentor styles and program focus. Five synthesized findings were identified from the data extraction process, each consisting of four categories. These synthesized findings were: establishing cultural relevancy, facilitating environments, building relationships, facilitating community engagement, and leadership responsibilities, which were discussed in the context of extant mentoring theoretical frameworks. CONCLUSION Mentoring is an appropriate strategy for improving general well-being. However, more research is needed to explore program sustainability and maintaining outcomes in the long term.
Collapse
|