1
|
Askeland S, Guise V, Aase K, Sogstad MKR. Families' Strategies for Navigating Care for Their Child With Cerebral Palsy: A Qualitative Study. Health Expect 2025; 28:e70197. [PMID: 40087998 PMCID: PMC11909468 DOI: 10.1111/hex.70197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2024] [Revised: 12/23/2024] [Accepted: 02/12/2025] [Indexed: 03/17/2025] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Families of children with medical complexities, like cerebral palsy (CP), often interact with multiple service providers across healthcare, education, social services, and family support sectors. To navigate these services, families shoulder various responsibilities, such as managing appointments, understanding different service systems, and advocating for their child's needs. However, our understanding of how families navigate these services remains limited. Therefore, this study explores families' strategies for navigating services for their child with cerebral palsy. METHODS Data were gathered through interviews with six families who each have a child diagnosed with CP aged between 8 and 12 years old. These interviews involved both children and parents and were conducted in three consecutive semi-structured sessions with each family. Additionally, observations were conducted during multidisciplinary coordination meetings held at the children's schools, involving parents and service providers. RESULTS To navigate services, parents applied strategies to (1) become experts on both their child's diagnosis, challenges, care needs and on the services available; (2) act as proactive participants in their child's care; and (3) manage day-to-day care. In doing so, families contributed to the provision of family-centred services according to their care needs. CONCLUSION Families make use of several different strategies to navigate the services. By applying these strategies, they effectively express their care needs and facilitate tailored services, thus contributing towards a family-centred approach. This highlights the importance of supporting the strategies used by families when collaborating with the services. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION Families actively participated in shaping the study by engaging in a series of interviews, discussing topics important to them, and reviewing the information provided. This approach ensures that their experiences and needs are accurately captured and addressed. Additionally, families shared their thoughts on how services could be improved to better meet their care needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silje Askeland
- SHARE – Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of StavangerStavangerNorway
| | - Veslemøy Guise
- SHARE – Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of StavangerStavangerNorway
| | - Karina Aase
- SHARE – Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of StavangerStavangerNorway
- Centre for Care Research, Department of Health Science in GjøvikNTNUGjøvikNorway
| | - Maren Kristine Raknes Sogstad
- SHARE – Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of StavangerStavangerNorway
- Centre for Care Research, Department of Health Science in GjøvikNTNUGjøvikNorway
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Thomas KC, Annis IE, deJong NA, Christian RB, Davis SA, Hughes PM, Prichard BA, Prichard JR, Allen PS, Gettinger JS, Morris DAN, Eaker KB. Association Between Neighborhood Context and Psychotropic Polypharmacy Use Among High-Need Children. Psychiatr Serv 2025; 76:139-148. [PMID: 39257315 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.20230639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/12/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The authors explored whether neighborhood context is associated with psychotropic polypharmacy and psychotherapy among a cohort of children with high needs for psychiatric and general medical care. METHODS Electronic health record data from a large health care system were used in a cross-sectional design to examine psychotropic polypharmacy and psychotherapy in 2015-2019 among children ages 2-17 years (N=4,017) with geocoded addresses. Inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of a mental health condition, an intellectual and developmental disability, or a complex medical condition and one or more clinical encounters annually over the study period. Polypharmacy was defined as two or more psychotropic drug class prescriptions concurrently for ≥60 days. Psychotherapy was defined as receipt of any psychotherapy or adaptive behavior treatment. Neighborhood context (health, environment, education, and wealth) was measured with the Child Opportunity Index. Multilevel generalized linear mixed models with random intercept for census tracts were used to assess the associations between individual and neighborhood characteristics and psychotropic polypharmacy and psychotherapy. RESULTS Moderate (vs. low) child opportunity was associated with higher odds of polypharmacy (adjusted OR [AOR]=1.79, 95% CI=1.19-2.67). High (vs. low) child opportunity was associated with higher odds of psychotherapy (AOR=2.15, 95% CI=1.43-3.21). Black (vs. White) race (AOR=0.51, 95% CI=0.37-0.71) and Hispanic ethnicity (AOR=0.44, 95% CI=0.26-0.73) were associated with lower odds of polypharmacy. CONCLUSIONS Among high-need children, neighborhood Child Opportunity Index, race, and ethnicity were significantly associated with treatment outcomes in analyses adjusted for clinical factors. The findings underscore concerns about structural disparities and systemic racism and raise questions about access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathleen C Thomas
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC) Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill (Thomas, Annis, Davis, Hughes); UNC Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, Chapel Hill (Thomas, Hughes); Departments of Pediatrics (deJong, Christian) and Psychiatry (Christian), UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill; Parent Advisory Group, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill (B. A. Prichard, J. R. Prichard, Allen, Gettinger, Morris, Eaker)
| | - Izabela E Annis
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC) Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill (Thomas, Annis, Davis, Hughes); UNC Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, Chapel Hill (Thomas, Hughes); Departments of Pediatrics (deJong, Christian) and Psychiatry (Christian), UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill; Parent Advisory Group, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill (B. A. Prichard, J. R. Prichard, Allen, Gettinger, Morris, Eaker)
| | - Neal A deJong
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC) Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill (Thomas, Annis, Davis, Hughes); UNC Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, Chapel Hill (Thomas, Hughes); Departments of Pediatrics (deJong, Christian) and Psychiatry (Christian), UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill; Parent Advisory Group, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill (B. A. Prichard, J. R. Prichard, Allen, Gettinger, Morris, Eaker)
| | - Robert B Christian
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC) Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill (Thomas, Annis, Davis, Hughes); UNC Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, Chapel Hill (Thomas, Hughes); Departments of Pediatrics (deJong, Christian) and Psychiatry (Christian), UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill; Parent Advisory Group, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill (B. A. Prichard, J. R. Prichard, Allen, Gettinger, Morris, Eaker)
| | - Scott A Davis
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC) Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill (Thomas, Annis, Davis, Hughes); UNC Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, Chapel Hill (Thomas, Hughes); Departments of Pediatrics (deJong, Christian) and Psychiatry (Christian), UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill; Parent Advisory Group, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill (B. A. Prichard, J. R. Prichard, Allen, Gettinger, Morris, Eaker)
| | - Phillip M Hughes
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC) Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill (Thomas, Annis, Davis, Hughes); UNC Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, Chapel Hill (Thomas, Hughes); Departments of Pediatrics (deJong, Christian) and Psychiatry (Christian), UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill; Parent Advisory Group, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill (B. A. Prichard, J. R. Prichard, Allen, Gettinger, Morris, Eaker)
| | - Beth A Prichard
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC) Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill (Thomas, Annis, Davis, Hughes); UNC Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, Chapel Hill (Thomas, Hughes); Departments of Pediatrics (deJong, Christian) and Psychiatry (Christian), UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill; Parent Advisory Group, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill (B. A. Prichard, J. R. Prichard, Allen, Gettinger, Morris, Eaker)
| | - Jason R Prichard
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC) Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill (Thomas, Annis, Davis, Hughes); UNC Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, Chapel Hill (Thomas, Hughes); Departments of Pediatrics (deJong, Christian) and Psychiatry (Christian), UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill; Parent Advisory Group, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill (B. A. Prichard, J. R. Prichard, Allen, Gettinger, Morris, Eaker)
| | - Pamela S Allen
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC) Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill (Thomas, Annis, Davis, Hughes); UNC Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, Chapel Hill (Thomas, Hughes); Departments of Pediatrics (deJong, Christian) and Psychiatry (Christian), UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill; Parent Advisory Group, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill (B. A. Prichard, J. R. Prichard, Allen, Gettinger, Morris, Eaker)
| | - Joshua S Gettinger
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC) Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill (Thomas, Annis, Davis, Hughes); UNC Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, Chapel Hill (Thomas, Hughes); Departments of Pediatrics (deJong, Christian) and Psychiatry (Christian), UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill; Parent Advisory Group, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill (B. A. Prichard, J. R. Prichard, Allen, Gettinger, Morris, Eaker)
| | - D'Jenne-Amal N Morris
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC) Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill (Thomas, Annis, Davis, Hughes); UNC Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, Chapel Hill (Thomas, Hughes); Departments of Pediatrics (deJong, Christian) and Psychiatry (Christian), UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill; Parent Advisory Group, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill (B. A. Prichard, J. R. Prichard, Allen, Gettinger, Morris, Eaker)
| | - Kerri B Eaker
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC) Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill (Thomas, Annis, Davis, Hughes); UNC Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, Chapel Hill (Thomas, Hughes); Departments of Pediatrics (deJong, Christian) and Psychiatry (Christian), UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill; Parent Advisory Group, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill (B. A. Prichard, J. R. Prichard, Allen, Gettinger, Morris, Eaker)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rosenberg AR, Pickles DM, Harris DS, Lannon CM, Houtrow A, Boat T, Ramsey B. Supporting the Well-Being of Children and Youth With Special Health Care Needs: NASEM Proceedings. Pediatrics 2024; 154:e2024067032. [PMID: 39600219 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2024-067032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2024] [Revised: 07/22/2024] [Accepted: 07/23/2024] [Indexed: 11/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Children and youth with special health care needs (CYSHCN) are living longer than ever. These advances come with a price: Patients, families, communities, and systems must absorb the challenges of chronic caregiving, including protracted stress and poor mental health. In 2023, the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine convened thought-leaders for conversations about supporting the emotional well-being of CYSHCN and their families. Invited panelists included 2 parents and 3 academic pediatricians. Parents suggested opportunities for clinicians and systems to better support CYSHCN. Clinicians described work focused on: Individual patient- and family-level resilience: Defined as a process of harnessing resources to sustain well-being in the face of stress, resilience is learnable. Programs that teach people to identify and bolster "resilience resources" show promise in improving child and caregiver mental health;Clinician- and practice-level provision of care: Individual-level interventions are only effective if clinicians know when and how to deliver them. Hence, the American Board of Pediatrics created and demonstrated the success of a "roadmap" to support routine screening for and discussion of social and emotional health needs; andSystems-level barriers: Even with patient-level programs and clinician-practice guidance, unmet social and mental health needs persist. Accessing and coordinating services is difficult, may not be covered by insurance, and historically marginalized populations are the least likely to benefit. Together, the panel underscored a critical fact: We cannot optimize child and family well-being without focusing on patients, caregivers, clinicians, and systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abby R Rosenberg
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | - Carole M Lannon
- Anderson Center for Health Systems Excellence, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Amy Houtrow
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Thomas Boat
- University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Bonnie Ramsey
- Seattle Children's Research Institute; Seattle, Washington
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Foster AA, Hoffmann JA, Douglas MD, Monuteaux MC, Douglas KE, Benevides TW, Hudgins JD, Stewart AM. Comprehensiveness of State Insurance Laws and Perceived Access to Pediatric Mental Health Care. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2426402. [PMID: 39133489 PMCID: PMC11320173 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.26402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2024] [Accepted: 06/10/2024] [Indexed: 08/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Many US children and adolescents with mental and behavioral health (MBH) conditions do not access MBH services. One contributing factor is limited insurance coverage, which is influenced by state MBH insurance parity legislation. Objective To investigate the association of patient-level factors and the comprehensiveness of state MBH insurance legislation with perceived poor access to MBH care and perceived inadequate MBH insurance coverage for US children and adolescents. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted using responses by caregivers of children and adolescents aged 6 to 17 years with MBH conditions in the National Survey of Children's Health and State Mental Health Insurance Laws Dataset from 2016 to 2019. Data analyses were conducted from May 2022 to January 2024. Exposure MBH insurance legislation comprehensiveness defined by State Mental Health Insurance Laws Dataset (SMHILD) scores (range, 0-7). Main Outcomes and Measures Perceived poor access to MBH care and perceived inadequacy of MBH insurance were assessed. Multivariable regression models adjusted for individual-level characteristics. Results There were 29 876 caregivers of children and adolescents with MBH conditions during the study period representing 14 292 300 youths nationally (7 816 727 aged 12-17 years [54.7%]; 8 455 171 male [59.2%]; 292 543 Asian [2.0%], 2 076 442 Black [14.5%], and 9 942 088 White [69.6%%]; 3 202 525 Hispanic [22.4%]). A total of 3193 caregivers representing 1 770 492 children and adolescents (12.4%) perceived poor access to MBH care, and 3517 caregivers representing 1 643 260 of 13 175 295 children and adolescents (12.5%) perceived inadequate MBH insurance coverage. In multivariable models, there were higher odds of perceived poor access to MBH care among caregivers of Black (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.35; 95% CI, 1.04-1.75) and Asian (aOR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.01-2.84) compared with White children and adolescents. As exposures to adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) increased, the odds of perceived poor access to MBH care increased (aORs ranged from 1.68; 95%, CI 1.32-2.13 for 1 ACE to 4.28; 95% CI, 3.17-5.77 for ≥4 ACEs compared with no ACEs). Compared with living in states with the least comprehensive MBH insurance legislation (SMHILD score, 0-2), living in states with the most comprehensive legislation (SMHILD score, 5-7) was associated with lower odds of perceived poor access to MBH care (aOR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.63-0.99), while living in states with moderately comprehensive legislation (score, 4) was associated with higher odds of perceived inadequate MBH insurance coverage (aOR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.01-1.49). Conclusions and Relevance In this study, living in states with the most comprehensive MBH insurance legislation was associated with lower odds of perceived poor access to MBH care among caregivers for children and adolescents with MBH conditions. This finding suggests that advocacy for comprehensive mental health parity legislation may promote improved child and adolescent access to MBH services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley A. Foster
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Jennifer A. Hoffmann
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Megan D. Douglas
- Department of Community Health and Preventive Medicine, National Center for Primary Care, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Michael C. Monuteaux
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Katherine E. Douglas
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Teal W. Benevides
- Institute of Public and Preventive Health, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia
| | - Joel D. Hudgins
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Amanda M. Stewart
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Children’s National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Campisi C, Pham D, Rapoport E, Adesman A. Parenting Stress, Community Support, and Unmet Health Care Needs of Children in the US. Matern Child Health J 2024; 28:1010-1019. [PMID: 38353888 DOI: 10.1007/s10995-024-03912-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 05/01/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In 2018, approximately 2.3 million children in the United States had unmet healthcare needs (UHCN). To date, studies examining associations between UHCN and parent stress and support have had limited generalizability. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between children's UHCN and parenting stress and support using a nationally representative sample. Additionally, this study aimed to assess associations between unmet mental health needs and these parental well-being measures. METHODS Households with children ages 0-17 and complete data on UHCN in the combined 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019 cohorts of the National Survey of Children's Health (NSCH) met inclusion criteria. Logistic regressions were used to evaluate associations between overall UHCN and outcome measures of parental coping, aggravation, emotional support, and neighborhood support. Associations between mental UHCN and these outcome measures were analyzed in a subset limited to children with mental health conditions. Regressions were adjusted for potential confounders, including demographics, household income, medical home status, and health insurance (adequacy/type). RESULTS In our sample of 131,299 children, overall UHCN were associated with poorer parental coping (aOR = 5.35, 95% CI: [3.60, 7.95]), greater parental aggravation (aOR = 3.35, 95% CI: [2.73, 4.12]), and non-supportive neighborhood (aOR = 2.22, 95% CI: [1.86, 2.65]). Mental UHCN were similarly associated with parental coping and aggravation and neighborhood support in the mental health subset. CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE Healthcare professionals must address the needs of children with UHCN and collaborate with community organizations and child advocates to promote coordinated and comprehensive care and adequately support caregivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Campisi
- Department of Pediatrics, Steven and Alexandra Cohen Children's Medical Center of New York, Lake Success, NY, USA
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Duy Pham
- Department of Pediatrics, Steven and Alexandra Cohen Children's Medical Center of New York, Lake Success, NY, USA
- University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Eli Rapoport
- Department of Pediatrics, Steven and Alexandra Cohen Children's Medical Center of New York, Lake Success, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrew Adesman
- Department of Pediatrics, Steven and Alexandra Cohen Children's Medical Center of New York, Lake Success, NY, USA.
- Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, USA.
- Division of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 1983 Marcus Avenue, Lake Success, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tchoua PP, Clarke E, Wasser H, Agrawal S, Scothorn R, Thompson K, Schenkelberg M, Willis EA. The interaction between social determinants of health, health behaviors, and child's intellectual developmental diagnosis. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2024:2024.05.23.24307804. [PMID: 38826242 PMCID: PMC11142268 DOI: 10.1101/2024.05.23.24307804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Social determinants of health (SDOH) may impact caregivers' ability to implement evidence-based health practices at home during early childhood, especially in families with children with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD). Therefore, we examined the influence of SDOH and children's diagnosis (typically developing [TD], Down syndrome [DS], autism) on caregiver's self-report of meeting evidence-based health practices. METHODS Caregivers (n=172) of children ages 2-6 years (TD: n=93, DS: n=40, autism: n=39) completed an online survey on SDOH and health practices related to child nutrition (CN), physical activity (PA), outdoor play (OP), and screen time (ST). A total SDOH score was computed by assigning 1 point for each favorable SDOH metric (range 0-13). Linear regressions were used to examine associations between SDOH and CN, PA, OP, ST health practices and the moderating effect of IDD diagnosis. RESULTS Most caregivers were non-Hispanic White (84.3%), female (76.7%), 18-35 years old (55.2%), and married (89.5%). The DS group had the lowest SDOH score (mean = 8.4±1.0) compared to autism (mean = 10.1±1.0) and TD (mean = 11.0±0.9). No family scored 100% in evidence-based practices for any health practice. SDOH score was significantly associated with evidence-based practices met score for CN (b = 1.94, 95% CI = 0.84, 3.04; p = 0.001) and PA (b = 4.86, 95% CI = 2.92, 6.79; p <0.0001). Moderation analysis showed no association in the DS and autism groups between SDOH score and CN percent total score, or between SDOH score and CN, PA, and OP for percent evidence-based practices met. SDOH score was also not associated with OP percent total score for the DS group. CONCLUSIONS This study highlights the differential influence of SDOH on caregivers' implementing health practices in families with children of different IDD diagnoses. Future research is needed to understand impacts of SDOH on non-typically developing children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phoebe P Tchoua
- Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America
| | - Emily Clarke
- Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America
| | - Heather Wasser
- Gillings School of Public Health, Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America
| | - Seema Agrawal
- Gillings School of Public Health, Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America
| | - Rebecca Scothorn
- Gillings School of Public Health, Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America
| | - Kelsey Thompson
- Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America
| | - Michaela Schenkelberg
- School of Health and Kinesiology, University of Nebraska at Omaha, 6001 Dodge Street Omaha, NE, United States of America
| | - Erik A Willis
- Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Li H, Dodd-Butera T, Beaman ML, Burtea R. Immediate Caregiving Environment of Young Children with Autism: Findings from the U.S. National Survey of Children's Health. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 21:12. [PMID: 38276800 PMCID: PMC10815337 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21010012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Revised: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a complex neurodevelopmental disability that negatively affects children's learning, motor behavior, social communication, and interaction. It was estimated that, in 2020, 1 in 36 children aged 8 years in the United States had ASD. Caring for children with ASD might exert significant psychological and emotional distress on parents. Receiving parental emotional support and fostering positive parent-child interactions at home have been identified as beneficial for the immediate caregiving environment for children with ASD. The current secondary analysis of the 2019-2020 National Survey of Children's Health examined parent-child interactions and accessible sources of emotional support for parents caring for 3-5-year-old children diagnosed with ASD (N = 243). Children with the following characteristics had higher odds of having ASD: male gender; having no private insurance or uninsured; and having less than excellent general health. Among parents, higher odds of caring for children with ASD were associated with accessing emotional support from various sources, especially from healthcare professionals and peers, and spending more time telling stories and/or singing to their children. Given these significant health disparities, educational interventions and strategies are needed to foster a positive home caregiving environment for young children with ASD, including equitable access to parent resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong Li
- Department of Doctoral Studies, Institute of Health Research, School of Nursing, Azusa Pacific University, 606 E Huntington Dr., Room 235, Monrovia, CA 91016, USA
| | - Teresa Dodd-Butera
- Departments of Public Health and Doctoral Studies, Institute of Health Research, School of Nursing, Azusa Pacific University, San Diego, CA 92108, USA;
| | - Margaret L. Beaman
- Department of Nursing, California State University, San Bernardino, CA 92407, USA
| | - Rebecca Burtea
- Department of Mathematics, Physics, and Statistics, Azusa Pacific University, Azusa, CA 91702, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Schiavoni KH, Flom M, Blumenthal KJ, Orav EJ, Hefferon M, Maher E, Boudreau AA, Giuliano CP, Chambers B, Mandell MH, Vienneau M, Mendu ML, Vogeli C. Cost, Utilization, and Patient and Family Experience With ACO-Based Pediatric Care Management. Pediatrics 2023; 152:e2022058268. [PMID: 38013488 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2022-058268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Children and Youth with Special Health Care Needs have high healthcare utilization, fragmented care, and unmet health needs. Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) increasingly use pediatric care management to improve quality and reduce unnecessary utilization. We evaluated effects of pediatric care management on total medical expense (TME) and utilization; perceived quality of care coordination, unmet needs, and patient and family experience; and differential impact by payor, risk score, care manager discipline, and behavioral health diagnosis. METHODS Mixed-methods analysis including claims using quasi-stepped-wedge design pre and postenrollment to estimate difference-in-differences, participant survey, and semistructured interviews. Participants included 1321 patients with medical, behavioral, or social needs, high utilization, in Medicaid or commercial ACOs, and enrolled in multidisciplinary, primary care-embedded care management. RESULTS TME significantly declined 1 to 6 months postenrollment and continued through 19 to 24 months (-$645.48 per member per month, P < .001). Emergency department and inpatient utilization significantly decreased 7 to 12 months post-enrollment and persisted through 19 to 24 months (-29% emergency department, P = .012; -82% inpatient, P < .001). Of respondents, 87.2% of survey respondents were somewhat or very satisfied with care coordination, 56.1% received education coordination when needed, and 81.5% had no unmet health needs. Emergency department or inpatient utilization decreases were consistent across payors and care manager disciplines, occurred sooner with behavioral health diagnoses, and were significant among children with above-median risk scores. Satisfaction and experience were equivalent across groups, with more unmet needs and frustration with above-median risk scores. CONCLUSIONS Pediatric care management in multipayor ACOs may effectively reduce TME and utilization and clinically provide high-quality care coordination, including education and family stress, with high participant satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine H Schiavoni
- Mass General Brigham, Population Health Management, Somerville, Massachusetts
- Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Megan Flom
- Mass General Brigham, Population Health Management, Somerville, Massachusetts
| | - Karen J Blumenthal
- Mass General Brigham, Population Health Management, Somerville, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - E John Orav
- Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Margaret Hefferon
- Mass General Brigham, Population Health Management, Somerville, Massachusetts
| | - Erin Maher
- Mass General Brigham, Population Health Management, Somerville, Massachusetts
| | - Alexy Arauz Boudreau
- Mass General Brigham, Population Health Management, Somerville, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Christopher P Giuliano
- Mass General Brigham, Population Health Management, Somerville, Massachusetts
- Affiliated Pediatric Practices, Dedham, Massachusetts
- Mass General Brigham Community Physicians Organization, Somerville, Massachusetts
| | - Barbara Chambers
- Mass General Brigham, Population Health Management, Somerville, Massachusetts
- Mass General Brigham Community Physicians Organization, Somerville, Massachusetts
| | - Mark H Mandell
- Mass General Brigham, Population Health Management, Somerville, Massachusetts
- Pediatric Associates of Greater Salem, Salem, Massachusetts
| | - Maryann Vienneau
- Mass General Brigham, Population Health Management, Somerville, Massachusetts
| | - Mallika L Mendu
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Medicine, Renal Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Christine Vogeli
- Mass General Brigham, Population Health Management, Somerville, Massachusetts
- The Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Herbell K, Graaf G. Parents' Perspectives in Accessing Psychiatric Residential Treatment for Children and Youth: Differential Experiences by Funding Source. CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW 2023; 154:107148. [PMID: 37841201 PMCID: PMC10569116 DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.107148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2023]
Abstract
Objective There are well-documented disparities in access to mental health care for children and youth with significant behavioral health needs. Few studies that explored the differential experiences of families who use private vs public sources of financing (i.e., insurance and funding) in accessing residential treatment (RT) for children and youth. This study aimed to examine the lived experiences of families accessing psychiatric residential treatment (RT) and contextualize these experiences based on source of financing. Methods Twenty parents completed two interviews about their experiences with RT including the process for gaining access, length of stay, and aftercare. Parents were also asked about barriers (e.g., custody relinquishment), and facilitators (e.g., policies in the state) to accessing RT. Data were analyzed using content analysis. Results There were three distinct groups of families in the study. The first group includes lower income families whose children had public health coverage before needing RT. The second group comprises middle-income families whose children had private coverage but lived in states where there were no RTs that accepted private insurance or private payment and who did not have the means to send their child to RT in another state. The final group included higher income families with private insurance and enough private resources to overcome the limitations of insurance and state policies. This study illuminates key barriers and hardships for families accessing RT: 1) waiting long waiting periods and navigating complex systems; 2) inadequate lengths of stay; and 3) inadequate aftercare and support in the community transition. Conclusions This study is among the first to examine how access to RT differs by whether a family has access to public or private resources. Taken together, these findings support the importance of insurance and financing for families accessing RT for their children and the need for systemic changes in policies and practices to reduce disparities in access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kayla Herbell
- The Ohio State University College of Nursing 1585 Neil Ave Columbus, OH 43210
| | - Genevieve Graaf
- The University of Texas at Arlington 701 S. Nedderman Dr Arlington, TX 76019
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Graaf G, Palmer AN. Parent Ratings of Health Insurance Adequacy for Children with Emotional, Behavioral, or Developmental Problems. Acad Pediatr 2023; 23:1204-1212. [PMID: 36336328 PMCID: PMC10578061 DOI: 10.1016/j.acap.2022.10.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Revised: 10/21/2022] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Parents of children with special health care needs (CSHCN) report that private insurance is less adequate than public health coverage. Parents of CSHCN with emotional, behavioral, or developmental problems (EBDPs) may perceive private insurance to be especially inadequate due to higher need for a wider array of non-medical services and supports. This study's objective is to assess differences in parent ratings of insurance adequacy for public versus private health coverage between non-CSHCN, CSHCN, and CSHCN with EBDPs. METHODS This study pooled publicly available data from the 2016 through 2019 National Survey of Children's Health. Multivariable fixed effects logistic regression models estimated the association between insurance type, CSCHN and EBDP status, and parent ratings of their child's insurance adequacy. Marginal effects were calculated for insurance type, CSHCN and EBDP status, and their interactions to estimate the size of the association. RESULTS Among all subgroups, consistently more parents with publicly insured children rated their insurance as adequate compared to those with private insurance. Parents of privately insured CSHCN with EBDPs rated their insurance as adequate at significantly lower rates than any other group of parents (55%)-including those with privately insured children without EBDPs (non-CSHCN= 67%; CSHCN = 63%) and all other parents with publicly insured children (non-CSHCN = 87%; CSHCN = 83%; CSHCN with EBDPs = 84%). CONCLUSIONS Future research should investigate if perceptions of insurance adequacy among families whose CSHCN has an EBDP aligns with reports of service access and unmet health care needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Genevieve Graaf
- School of Social Work (G Graaf), The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Tex.
| | - Ashley N Palmer
- Department of Social Work (AN Palmer), Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, Tex
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ackerman SL, Brown JEH, Zamora A, Outram S. "I Have Fought for so Many Things": Disadvantaged families' Efforts to Obtain Community-Based Services for Their Child after Genomic Sequencing. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2023; 14:208-217. [PMID: 37162201 PMCID: PMC10615790 DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2023.2209747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Families whose child has unexplained intellectual or developmental differences often hope that a genetic diagnosis will lower barriers to community-based therapeutic and support services. However, there is little known about efforts to mobilize genetic information outside the clinic or how socioeconomic disadvantage shapes and constrains outcomes. METHODS We conducted an ethnographic study with predominantly socioeconomically disadvantaged families enrolled in a multi-year genomics research study, including clinic observations and in-depth interviews in English and Spanish at multiple time points. Coding and thematic development were used to collaboratively interpret fieldnotes and transcripts. RESULTS Thirty-two families participated. Themes included familial expectations that a genetic diagnosis could be translated into information, understanding, and assistance to improve the quality of a child's day-to-day life. After sequencing, however, genetic information was not readily converted into improved access to services beyond the clinic, with families often struggling to use a genetic diagnosis to advocate for their child. CONCLUSION Families' ability to use a genetic diagnosis as an effective advocacy tool beyond the clinic was limited by the knowledge and resources available to them, and by the eligibility criteria used by therapeutic service providers' - which focused on clinical diagnosis and functional criteria more than etiologic information. All families undertaking genomic testing, particularly those who are disadvantaged, need additional support to understand the limits and potential benefits of genetic information beyond the clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara L Ackerman
- Program in Bioethics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- Department of Social & Behavioral Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- Institute for Health & Aging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Julia E H Brown
- Program in Bioethics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- Institute for Health & Aging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Astrid Zamora
- Program in Bioethics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Simon Outram
- Program in Bioethics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- Department of Social & Behavioral Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- Institute for Health & Aging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Morgan PL, Hu EH, Woods AD, Gloski CA, Wang Y. Disparities in Family-Centered Care Among US Children and Youth with Special Healthcare Needs. J Pediatr 2023; 253:297-303.e6. [PMID: 36152688 PMCID: PMC10635424 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2022.09.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Revised: 09/12/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Cross-sectional analyses of 4 nationally representative samples indicate disparities in family-centered care occur among US children and youth with special healthcare needs by race and ethnicity, family income and composition, insurance coverage, and healthcare setting. Measured confounds including children's health and impairment severity do not explain the disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul L Morgan
- Department of Education Policy Studies, Penn State University, University Park, PA; Population Research Institute, Penn State University, University Park, PA.
| | - Eric Hengyu Hu
- Department of Education Policy Studies, Penn State University, University Park, PA; Population Research Institute, Penn State University, University Park, PA
| | - Adrienne D Woods
- Center for Learning and Development, SRI International, Menlo Park, CA
| | - Cecelia A Gloski
- Department of Education Policy Studies, Penn State University, University Park, PA; Population Research Institute, Penn State University, University Park, PA
| | - Yangyang Wang
- Department of Education Policy Studies, Penn State University, University Park, PA; Population Research Institute, Penn State University, University Park, PA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Smith SL, Aytur SA, Humphreys BP. Effects of Telehealth Parent Coaching in Supporting Family Participation, Cohesion, and Adaptability. OTJR-OCCUPATION PARTICIPATION AND HEALTH 2023; 43:24-34. [PMID: 35574933 DOI: 10.1177/15394492221083664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Families provide foundational contexts in which most children develop and grow. For families of children with special health care needs (CSHCN), interdisciplinary supports can build family participation capacities, beyond individualistic child supports. This single-group pretest-posttest quasi-experimental study sought to determine the preliminary effects of the Healthy Families Flourish Program (HFFP), a telehealth occupation-based parent coaching intervention to promote participation, cohesion, adaptability, and communication for families of CSHCN. Eleven families, including 17 parents and 27 children, completed the 10-session intervention consisting of parent education and individualized coaching. Participants completed the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure, Goal Attainment Scaling, and the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales pre-/post-intervention. Within-group comparisons showed improvements in family participation, cohesion, adaptability, and communication with Cohen's d effect sizes ranging from 0.55-3.32. Researchers found positive relationships between family participation and cohesion as well as participation and adaptability. Findings provide considerations for supporting families within socioecological contexts.
Collapse
|
14
|
Graaf G, Gigli K. Care coordination and unmet need for specialised health services among children with special healthcare needs in the USA: results from a cross-sectional analysis of the national survey of children with special healthcare needs. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e063373. [PMID: 36385031 PMCID: PMC9670924 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To report rates of need and unmet need for specialised health services (occupational and speech therapies, durable medical equipment, home healthcare, and mobility and communication aids) from the National Survey of Children with Special Health Care Needs (CSHCN) (2009/2010) and assess the role of care coordination in having needs met. We distinguish between CSHCN with and without emotional, behavioural and developmental disorders (EBDPs) in the USA. DESIGN A cross sectional cohort study of a nationally representative sample of CSHCN from the National Survey of CSHCN for 2009/2010 used logistic regression to assess the relationship between EBDPs and need and unmet need for specialised services. It also estimates the association of care coordination with unmet need for all services, for CSHCN with and without EBDPs. SETTING A nationally representative sample of CSHCN in the USA. PARTICIPANTS Children ages 0-17 years of age. RESULTS Across all specialised health services, rates of unmet need were at or below 25%. Need and unmet need for most services was higher among CSHCN with EBDPs than those without. For CSHCN with and without EBDPs, adequate care coordination was associated with greater probability of having needs for therapy, home health and communication aids met. CONCLUSION Care coordination is essential to reducing barriers to a wide range of healthcare services for CSCHN. Policies requiring adequate insurance coverage for care coordination may play a critical role in ensuring access to specialised health services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Genevieve Graaf
- School of Social Work, University of Texas, Arlington, Texas, USA
| | - Kristin Gigli
- College of Nursing and Health Innovation, University of Texas, Arlington, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Graaf G, Baiden P, Keyes L, Boyd G. Barriers to Mental Health Services for Parents and Siblings of Children with Special Health Care Needs. JOURNAL OF CHILD AND FAMILY STUDIES 2022; 31:881-895. [PMID: 35039741 PMCID: PMC8754365 DOI: 10.1007/s10826-022-02228-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/03/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Caregivers of children with special health care needs (CSHCNs), especially those whose children have emotional, behavioral, or developmental problems (EBDPs), experience considerable strain and stress related to caring for their child's special needs. The enormous burden of caregiving can decrease a parent's ability to provide care, impacting the health of the child, the parents, and overall family functioning. To manage these challenges, these parents report the need for mental health care for themselves or their children, but many families with need go without care. Comprehensive knowledge about barriers to family mental health care for families of CSHCN is lacking. This study examines data from the National Survey of Children with Special Health Care Needs (2005/2006 and 2009/2010) to estimate time-specific, population-based prevalence of fourteen specific barriers to family mental health services and identifies risk factors for experiencing barriers to care for families of CSHCN. Among all CSHCN, cost barriers (33.5%) and lack of insurance (15.9%) were the most commonly reported obstacles to service access in 2005 and 2009, followed by inconvenient service times (12.3%), and locations (8.7%). Reports of these barriers increased significantly from 2005 to 2009. All types of barriers to family mental health services were reported significantly more frequently by CSHCN with EBDPs than by those without. CSHCN's race, insurance, and parent education and income levels were factors associated with cost barriers to family mental health care. Understanding barriers to mental health care for families of CSHCN is critical to creating policy and practice solutions that increase access to mental health care for these families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Genevieve Graaf
- School of Social Work, University of Texas at Arlington 211 South Cooper Street, Box 19129, Arlington, TX 76019 USA
| | - Philip Baiden
- School of Social Work, University of Texas at Arlington 211 South Cooper Street, Box 19129, Arlington, TX 76019 USA
| | - Latocia Keyes
- Department of Social Work, Tarleton State University, 1333 W. Washington, Stephenville, TX 76402 USA
| | - George Boyd
- School of Social Work, University of Texas at Arlington 211 South Cooper Street, Box 19129, Arlington, TX 76019 USA
| |
Collapse
|