Facial nerve preservation after vestibular schwannoma Gamma Knife radiosurgery

A 25-Year Update on the Facial Nerve Sparing Approach for Vestibular Schwannoma

BACKGROUND

This study updates the results of a facial nerve preservation approach to treating vestibular schwannomas at a single institution by a single surgeon using retrosigmoid craniectomy with microsurgery (MS) and gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) over a 25-year interval.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 751 patients between 1998 and 2023 and grouped them by intervention: MS only (Group 1, 217 patients), SRS only (Group 2, 447 patients), MS then SRS (Group 3, 72 patients), SRS then MS (Group 4, 10 patients), and SRS then SRS (Group 5, 5 patients). The primary outcome variable was facial nerve function, defined as House-Brackmann grade ≤2 at last follow-up.

RESULTS

Good outcomes by group were achieved in 98.2%, 99.6%, 93.1%, 90%, and 100% of patients, respectively. Upfront SRS (Group 2) resulted in significantly better facial nerve outcomes than upfront MS (Groups 1 and 3, 289 patients) (96.9% and 99.4%, P < 0.05). Mean tumor maximum linear diameters were 3.2, 1.32, 3.23, 1.98, and 1.64 cm. Subtotal resection rates in Groups 1, 3, and 4, were 68.2%, 81.9%, and 80%, respectively. The median (interquartile range) follow-up time among patients (minimum follow-up of 12 months) was 52 (26.75-88) months, with a maximum of 297 months (24.75 years). Overall, 98.1% of patients had a good facial nerve outcome with no operative mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

For larger tumors, MS emphasizing facial nerve preservation over gross total resection followed by adjuvant SRS for any interval tumor regrowth yields excellent facial nerve outcomes and tumor control rates. For smaller tumors, upfront SRS achieves superior facial nerve preservation with MS and SRS both viable salvage options for treatment of tumor progression. This paradigm balances tumor control, facial nerve preservation, and low morbidity.

Characterization of facial nerve outcomes following radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) is a precise and efficacious treatment modality for vestibular schwannoma (VS) with favorable cranial nerve preservation rates. This study aims to better characterize facial nerve (FN) outcomes in VS after GKRS.

METHODS

A query of six medical databases was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies exclusively reported VS managed with single-fraction GKRS and included House-Brackmann (HB) scale assessments prior to and following GKRS. Data was analyzed using random-effects modeling, and FN preservation was defined as HB I or II at last follow-up.

RESULTS

Data was analyzed from 15 articles with 3,155 patients at an mean age of 55.0 years. Mean tumor volume, radiation dose, follow-up, tumor control, and hearing preservation were 4.28 cm3, 13.3 Gy, 59.4 months, 92.7%, and 62.6%, respectively. The pooled FN preservation rate was 92.9%. Mean preoperative tumor volume > 2.5 cm3 and age > 60 years were significantly associated with worse preoperative FN function (p = 0.019, p = 0.023, respectively). Normal FN function (HB = 1) at last follow up was 95.8% for VS volume < 2.5 cm3 and 89.4% with larger volumes (p < 0.001). Doses ≤ 13 Gy were significantly associated with superior FN preservation (96.5%) compared to higher doses (p < 0.001). Tumor control and hearing preservation were not significantly associated with FN preservation.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis identifies tumor volume and radiation dose as prognostic factors for FN preservation. A FN preservation rate of 93% may be expected at five years after GKRS. This study provides a unique characterization of FN outcome that should be considered in the management of VS.

Delayed Facial Nerve Dysfunction Following CyberKnife® Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannoma

OBJECTIVE

The incidence and risk factors for facial nerve dysfunction (FND) following CyberKnife® therapy for vestibular schwannoma (VS) remain poorly understood. This study investigates whether differential radiation doses to vulnerable segments of the facial nerve may be associated with FND outcomes.

METHODS

Patients were identified who underwent CyberKnife® radiosurgery for VS at a single institution. Basic demographics, tumor characteristics, and facial nerve function were collected. Total radiation doses to tumor, internal auditory canal (IAC), and labyrinthine segment of facial nerve (LSFN) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Six out of 64 patients experienced FND following CyberKnife® treatment for VS (9.38%, 6/64). Patients with FND were compared to those without FND (control). Of the 64 patients, complete radiation records were obtained for 30 patients (6 FND vs. 24 control). There were no significant differences in demographic or tumor characteristics between control and FND cohorts. More severe FND (HB ≥ 4) had significantly larger tumors (3.74 vs. 1.27 cm3, p = 0.037) with directionally decreased time to FND (3.50 vs. 33.5 months, p = 0.106) than patients with HB < 4, respectively. There were directionally, nonsignificant differences between maximum radiation doses to the LSFN (2492.4 vs. 2557.0 cGy, p = 0.121) and IAC (2877.3 vs. 2895.5 cGy, p = 0.824) between the control and FND cohorts, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

FND may represent an underrecognized sequelae of CyberKnife® radiosurgery for VS that can occur many months following treatment. Further studies are needed to elucidate the effect of differential radiation exposure to the facial nerve with FND following treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 (Retrospective Cohort Study) Laryngoscope, 134:5080-5086, 2024.

Comparative analysis of upfront stereotactic radiosurgery and watchful waiting in the management of newly diagnosed vestibular schwannomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Vestibular schwannomas (VS) are benign intracranial tumors posing significant management challenges. This study aims to compare the outcomes of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and watchful waiting (WW) in the management of newly diagnosed VS, integrating findings from both retrospective and the pioneering V-REX prospective trial. Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was conducted using MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Studies directly comparing SRS with WW for newly diagnosed VS were included. Primary outcomes focused on hearing preservation assessed through the AAO-HNS or Gardner-Robertson hearing classification scales and tumor progression, with secondary outcomes focusing on neurological symptoms, and the need for further treatment. Thirteen studies encompassing 1,635 patients (WW: 891; SRS: 744) were included.While no significant difference was found in serviceable hearing loss at last follow-up (RR = 1.51, [95%CI: 0.98, 2.32], p = 0.06), significant differences favoring WW were observed in pure tone audiometry (PTA) (MD = -13.51 [95%CI: -22.66, -4.37], p = 0.004) and word recognition score (WRS) (MD = 20.48 [95%CI: 9.72, 31.25], p = 0.0002). Analysis of tumor progression indicated no overall significant difference in risk between SRS and WW (RR = 0.40, [95%CI 0.07, 2.40], p = 0.32), but subgroup analysis suggested a lower risk with SRS in certain contexts. The need for further treatments favored SRS (RR = 0.24, [95%CI: 0.07, 0.74], p = 0.007). No significant differences were found in tinnitus and imbalance between the two groups. This comprehensive analysis suggests no marked difference in functional hearing preservation between SRS and WW in managing VS. However, untreated tumors commonly necessitate additional interventions. These findings highlight the need for individualized treatment decisions and underscore the importance of continued monitoring. The study advocates for further prospective trials to refine management strategies for VS.

Transcanal transpromontorial approach for vestibular schwannoma: experience of a single center

BACKGROUND

The expanded transpromontorial transcanal approach (ExpTTA) represents a recent addition to the surgical approaches available for the treatment of vestibular schwannoma. An initial purely endoscopic version has been complemented by the use of the microscope and it is now one of the possible surgical options for small to medium-sized vestibular schwannomas with a predominantly intracanalar development.

METHODS

This is a series of 54 patients who underwent microsurgical resection of sporadic, unilateral vestibular schwannoma, mainly Koos I-II with non-serviceable hearing, between January 2016 and January 2023 using the expanded transcanal transpromontorial approach. We describe the surgical technique, focusing on anatomical landmarks, and analyzing its advantages and shortcomings. Retrospective analysis of clinical outcomes is presented, including early and late complications. The mean follow-up was 46.7 months.

RESULTS

We achieved gross total resection of the lesion in all cases, confirmed on the first follow-up MRI at least 6 months after each procedure. We did not record any intraoperative complication nor disease recurrence. We recorded two postoperative severe facial nerve palsies, one of which was permanent. No cases of disabling vertigo or imbalance were reported, and all patients reported full recovery of autonomy in daily activities. Three cases of otoliquorrhea were managed conservatively successfully.

CONCLUSIONS

The transcanal transpromontorial approach combines the advantages of endoscopy with the possibilities provided by microsurgery. Our experience confirms its safety in terms of surgical complications and facial nerve outcome. This approach is amongst the treatment options for small-medium schwannomas in patients with impaired hearing, especially in young patients, ensuring radical resection, disease control, and minimal morbidity.

Long-Term Outcome of Unilateral Acoustic Neuromas With or Without Hearing Loss: Over 10 Years and Beyond After Gamma Knife Radiosurgery

BACKGROUND

Since the long-term outcomes of 162 patients who underwent gamma knife radiosurgery (GKS) as an initial or adjuvant treatment for acoustic neuromas (ANs) with unilateral hearing loss were first reported in 1998, there has been no report of a comprehensive analysis of what has changed in GKS practice.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of the long-term outcomes of 106 patients with unilateral sporadic ANs who underwent GKS as an initial treatment. The mean patient age was 50 years, and the mean initial tumor volume was 3.68 cm3 (range, 0.10-23.30 cm3). The median marginal tumor dose was 12.5 Gy (range, 8.0-15.0 Gy) and the median follow-up duration was 153 months (range, 120-216 months).

RESULTS

The tumor volume increased in 11 patients (10.4%), remained stationary in 27 (25.5%), and decreased in 68 patients (64.2%). The actuarial 3, 5, 10, and 15-year tumor control rates were 95.3 ± 2.1%, 94.3 ± 2.2%, 87.7 ± 3.2%, and 86.6 ± 3.3%, respectively. The 10-year actuarial tumor control rate was significantly lower in the patients with tumor volumes of ≥ 8 cm3 (P = 0.010). The rate of maintaining the same Gardner-Robertson scale grade was 28.6%, and that of serviceable hearing was 46.4%. The rates of newly developed facial and trigeminal neuropathy were 2.8% and 4.7%, respectively. The patients who received marginal doses of less than 12 Gy revealed higher tumor control failure rates (P = 0.129) and newly occurred facial or trigeminal neuropathy rates (P = 0.040 and 0.313, respectively).

CONCLUSION

GKS as an initial treatment for ANs could be helpful in terms of tumor control, the preservation of serviceable hearing, and the prevention of cranial neuropathy. It is recommended to perform GKS as soon as possible not only for tumor control in unilateral ANs with hearing loss but also for hearing preservation in those without hearing loss.

Repeat Surgery for Vestibular Schwannomas: An Institutional Case Series

Introduction  Vestibular schwannomas (VSs) are treated with microsurgery and/or radiosurgery. Repeat resection is rare, and few studies have reported postoperative outcomes. The objective of this study was to describe clinical characteristics and outcomes in patients undergoing repeat surgery for VS. Methods  All adult (≥ 18 years) patients undergoing VS resection between 2003 and 2022 at our institution were retrospectively reviewed to identify patients who underwent repeat surgery of an ipsilateral VS following prior gross-total (GTR) or subtotal resection. Patient, radiographic, and clinical characteristics were reviewed. Primary outcomes were postoperative tumor volume, extent of resection, postoperative cranial nerve deficits, and time to further tumor progression. Results  Of 102 patients undergoing VS resection, 6 (5.9%) had undergone repeat surgery. Median (range) follow-up was 20 (5-117) months. Three patients were female. Median age was 56 (36-60) years. Median pre- and postoperative tumor volumes were 8.2 (1.8-28.2) cm 3 and 0.4 (0-3.8) cm 3 . GTR was achieved in two patients. Four patients had higher House-Brackmann scores at last follow-up, but none had tumor progression. Conclusion  In this small cohort of patients, repeat resection of recurrent or progressive VS can effectively reduce tumor volume with acceptable perioperative outcomes.

Single Fraction and Hypofractionated Radiation Cause Cochlear Damage, Hearing Loss, and Reduced Viability of Merlin-Deficient Schwann Cells

BACKGROUND

Vestibular schwannomas (VS) are benign intracranial tumors caused by loss of function of the merlin tumor suppressor. We tested three hypotheses related to radiation, hearing loss (HL), and VS cell survival: (1) radiation causes HL by injuring auditory hair cells (AHC), (2) fractionation reduces radiation-induced HL, and (3) single fraction and equivalent appropriately dosed multi-fractions are equally effective at controlling VS growth. We investigated the effects of single fraction and hypofractionated radiation on hearing thresholds in rats, cell death pathways in rat cochleae, and viability of human merlin-deficient Schwann cells (MD-SC).

METHODS

Adult rats received cochlear irradiation with single fraction (0 to 18 Gray [Gy]) or hypofractionated radiation. Auditory brainstem response (ABR) testing was performed for 24 weeks. AHC viabilities were determined using immunohistochemistry. Neonatal rat cochleae were harvested after irradiation, and gene- and cell-based assays were conducted. MD-SCs were irradiated, and viability assays and immunofluorescence for DNA damage and cell cycle markers were performed.

RESULTS

Radiation caused dose-dependent and progressive HL in rats and AHC losses by promoting expression of apoptosis-associated genes and proteins. When compared to 12 Gy single fraction, hypofractionation caused smaller ABR threshold and pure tone average shifts and was more effective at reducing MD-SC viability.

CONCLUSIONS

Investigations into the mechanisms of radiation ototoxicity and VS radiobiology will help determine optimal radiation regimens and identify potential therapies to mitigate radiation-induced HL and improve VS tumor control.

Dosimetric predictive factors for facial nerve paralysis after cyberknife® stereotactic radiotherapy for vestibular schwannomas: A single institution experience of 88 patients

PURPOSE

To identify dosimetric predictive factors of facial nerve paralysis for patients with vestibular schwannomas (VS) treated in a single institution with Cyberknife® (CK) hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Eighty-eight patients were treated from 2010 to 2020. Different treatment schedules were used over that period, some prescribed to the 80% isodose line (4 × 5 Gy, 3 × 7 Gy, 3 × 8 Gy and 5 × 5 Gy) and one to the 70% isodose line (3 × 7.7 Gy). Local control tumor and facial nerve toxicity were recorded, as well as various dosimetric indicators.

RESULTS

Median follow-up 37 months (range, 7-96). Of the 88 stereotactic treatments, 20 patients (23%) developed objectively diagnosed radiation-induced facial nerve paralysis. The 2-year and 5-year local tumor control were respectively 95% and 88%, and the overall 2-year facial nerve preservation was 76%. Prescriptions with a maximum dose point (Dmax) of 33 Gy were at a substantially higher risk of facial paralysis than prescriptions with a Dmax less than or equal to 30 Gy (HR = 4.51, 95% CI = [1.04;19.6], p = 0.045). The 2-years cumulative incidences of facial paralysis were 32% [20%;44%] in the case of a 33 Gy Dmax, against 7% [1%;21%] otherwise. We identified four significative dosimetric predictive factors for radiation-induced facial nerve dysfunction: a GTV minimal dose over 22 Gy (EQD2 = 45.5 Gy, p = 0.019), a GTV mean dose over 29 Gy (EQD2 = 73.5 Gy, HR = 2.84, 95% CI = [1.10;7.36], p = 0.024), a PTV mean dose over 27 Gy (EQD2 = 64.8 Gy, HR = 10.52, 95% CI = [1.39;79.76], p = 0.002) and a PTV maximal dose of 32 Gy (EQD2 = 87.5 Gy,HR = 5.09, 95% CI = [1.17;22.15], p = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

We identified four dosimetric predictive factors for post-treatment facial paralysis. Increasing the doses of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for vestibular schwannomas leads to higher facial nerve toxicity and may lead to lower local control rates than other published series. Our three-hypofractionated regimens may have also played a role in these results.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for cerebellopontine meningiomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To (1) measure surgical outcomes associated with stereotactic radiosurgery treatment of cerebellopontine angle meningiomas, and (2) determine if differences in radiation dosages or preoperative tumor volumes affect surgical outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed on the PubMed, Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library databases searching for patients under stereotactic radiosurgery for meningiomas of the cerebellopontine angle. After data extraction and Newcastle-Ottawa scale quality assessment, meta-analysis of the data was performed with Review Manager 3.4.5.

RESULTS

In total, 6 studies including 406 patients were included. Postprocedure, patients had minimal cranial nerve complications while having an overall tumor control rate of 95.6%. Complications were minimal with facial nerve deficits occurring in 2.4%, sensation deficits of the trigeminal nerve in 4.0%, hearing loss in 5.9%, hydrocephalus in 2.0% and diplopia in 2.6% of all patients. Individuals with tumors extending into the internal auditory canal extension did not have significantly increases in hearing loss. There was a higher likelihood of tumor regression on postprocedure imaging in studies with a median prescription dose of >13 Gy (RR 1.27 [95% CI 1.04-1.56, p = 0.0225). There was no evidence of publication bias detected.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiosurgery is an effective modality for offering excellent tumor control of CPA meningiomas while allowing for only minimal complications postprocedure. A higher prescription dose may achieve higher tumor regression at follow up. Future studies should aim at establishing and optimizing accurate dosimetric guidelines for this patient population.

Pseudoprogression of Vestibular Schwannoma after Stereotactic Radiosurgery with Cyberknife®: Proposal for New Response Criteria

(1) Background: Transient increase in volume of vestibular schwannomas (VS) after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is common and complicates differentiation between treatment-related changes (pseudoprogression, PP) and tumor recurrence (progressive disease, PD). (2) Methods: Patients with unilateral VS (n = 63) underwent single fraction robotic-guided SRS. Volume changes were classified according to existing RANO criteria. A new response type, PP, with a >20% transient increase in volume was defined and divided into early (within the first 12 months) and late (>12 months) occurrence. (3) Results: The median age was 56 (range: 20-82) years, the median initial tumor volume was 1.5 (range: 0.1-8.6) cm³. The median radiological and clinical follow-up time was 66 (range: 24-103) months. Partial response was observed in 36% (n = 23), stable disease in 35% (n = 22) and PP in 29% (n = 18) of patients. The latter occurred early (16%, n = 10) or late (13%, n = 8). Using these criteria, no case of PD was observed. (4) Conclusion: Any volume increase after SRS for vs. assumed to be PD turned out to be early or late PP. Therefore, we propose modifying RANO criteria for SRS of VS, which may affect the management of vs. during follow-up in favor of further observation.

Hearing Preservation, Facial Nerve Dysfunction, and Tumor Control in Small Vestibular Schwannoma: A Systematic Review of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery Versus Microsurgery

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Vestibular schwannoma (VS) is the most common type of tumor found in the cerebellopontine angle that accounts for 8% of all intracranial tumors. VS management is currently a challenge due to the unpredictable nature of the tumor. Few studies have compared the results and complications of various therapeutic approaches to VS. Therefore, as a treatment option for VSs smaller than 25 mm, we conducted a systematic review to compare Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) with conventional surgery.

METHODS

Literature searches were conducted of four online databases (PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane, and ScienceDirect) using the following keyword search: ("vestibular schwannoma" OR "acoustic neuroma") AND ("gamma knife" OR "gamma knife radiosurgery") AND ("resection" OR "open surgery") AND ("hearing preservation" OR "facial nerve" OR "tumor growth").

RESULTS

We identified six retrospective cohort studies, five of which were of fair-to-good quality. All studies showed that GKRS was superior to surgery in hearing preservation. Two studies indicated that surgery was superior to GKRS in maintaining tumor control, one indicated that GKRS was superior, and the remainder indicated that there was no significant difference in maintaining tumor control between GKRS and microsurgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the three outcomes chosen for this review, GKRS was superior to microsurgery in small VS.

RAD51 Inhibitor and Radiation Toxicity in Vestibular Schwannoma

OBJECTIVE

To describe the RAD51 response (DNA repair) to radiation-induced DNA damage in patient-derived vestibular schwannoma (VS) cells and investigate the utility of RAD51 inhibitor (RI-1) in enhancing radiation toxicity.

STUDY DESIGN

Basic and translational science.

SETTING

Tertiary academic facility.

METHODS

VS tumors (n = 10) were cultured on 96-well plates and 16-well slides, exposed to radiation (0, 6, 12, or 18 Gy), and treated with RI-1 (0, 5, or 10 µM). Immunofluorescence was performed at 6 hours for γ-H2AX (DNA damage marker), RAD51 (DNA repair protein), and p21 (cell cycle arrest protein). Viability assays were performed at 96 hours, and capillary Western blotting was utilized to determine RAD51 expression in naïve VS tumors (n = 5).

RESULTS

VS tumors expressed RAD51. In cultured VS cells, radiation initiated dose-dependent increases in γ-H2AX and p21 expression. VS cells upregulated RAD51 to repair DNA damage following radiation. Addition of RI-1 reduced RAD51 expression in a dose-dependent manner and was associated with increased γ-H2AX levels and decreased viability in a majority of cultured VS tumors.

CONCLUSION

VS may evade radiation injury by entering cell cycle arrest and upregulating RAD51-dependent repair of radiation-induced double-stranded breaks in DNA. Although there was variability in responses among individual primary VS cells, RAD51 inhibition with RI-1 reduced RAD51-dependent DNA repair to enhance radiation toxicity in VS cells. Further investigations are warranted to understand the mechanisms of radiation resistance in VS and determine whether RI-1 is an effective radiosensitizer in patients with VS.

A 2 and 5-Year Longitudinal Analysis of 671 Consecutive Patients Diagnosed with Unilateral Vestibular Schwannoma

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the 2 and 5-year outcomes of a cohort of patients with newly diagnosed vestibular schwannoma patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Longitudinal cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary skull base referral unit.

PATIENTS

Six hundred and seventy-one consecutive patients referred to the Cambridge Skull Base Unit between 2005 and 2010.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

1) Treatment outcomes, 2) hearing preservation, 3) facial nerve function, and 4) gross tumor control.

RESULTS

At initial diagnosis, 440/671(65.6%) of patients entered a watch, wait and rescan (WWR) pathway, 208/671 (31%) underwent primary microsurgical excision and 23/671 (3.4%) primary radiotherapy. Of patients who entered WWR, 144/440 (32.7%) exhibited tumor growth necessitating secondary intervention at a mean of 22.7 months; 67.4% had radiotherapy and 32.6% surgery. Radiotherapy was successful at achieving tumor control in 95% of cases. Primary surgery via the translabyrinthine route was performed in the majority of cases allowing for a radiologically clear surgical resection in 93% of cases.

CONCLUSION

The Cambridge philosophy of treating the newly diagnosed vestibular schwannoma aims at preserving functional status where possible. In patients with small tumors it is recommended that they are placed on to a WWR pathway, of which 67.3% will not exhibit any growth by 5 years. If small tumors grow more than 2 mm by serial scanning, radiotherapy offers a high rate of tumor control. In patients with larger tumors more than 20 mm we would advocate microsurgical excision by the translabyrinthine route which offers excellent functional outcomes and gross tumor control.

Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Large Vestibular Schwannoma More Than 10 cm3: A Single-Center Indian Study

Introduction Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) is an effective treatment for benign vestibular schwannomas (VSs). The established cutoffs have recently been challenged, as recent literature expanded the horizon of GKRS to larger tumors. Even though microsurgery remains the primary option for large VS, GKRS can provide reasonable tumor control and is more likely to avoid cranial neuropathies associated with open surgery.

Methods We analyzed patients with VS with volume exceeding 10 cm3 who underwent GKRS at our center from January 2006 to December 2016. Clinicoradiological and radiosurgical data were collected from medical records for statistical analysis. Follow-up was performed every 6 months with a clinical assessment along with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain and audiometric evaluation in patients with serviceable hearing.

Results The study included 34 patients (18 males and 16 females) with an average age of 45.5 years. The mean tumor volume was 10.9 cm3 (standard deviation [SD], ± 0.83), with a median tumor dose of 12 Gy (interquartile range, 11.5–12) and a mean follow-up of 34.7 months (SD, ± 23.8). Tumor response was graded as regression in 50%, stable in 44.1%, and increase or GKRS failure in 2 cases (5.8%). Treatment failure was noted in five cases (14.7%), requiring microsurgical excision and a ventriculoperitoneal shunt post-GKRS. The tumor control rate for the cohort is 85.3%, with a facial preservation rate of 96% (24/25) and hearing loss in all (5/5), while three patients developed new-onset hypoesthesia. We noted that gait ataxia and involvement of cranial nerve V or VII at initial presentation were associated with GKRS failure in univariate analysis.

Conclusion Microsurgery should remain the first-choice treatment option for large VSs. GKRS is a viable alternative with good tumor control and improved or stabilized cranial neuropathies with a low complication rate.

Long-term Outcomes of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Treating Vestibular Schwannoma With a Lower Prescription Dose of 12 Gy Compared With Higher Dose Treatment

OBJECTIVE

Gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) is commonly used to treat vestibular schwannomas (VSs). The risk of complications from GKRS decreases at lower doses, but it is unknown if long-term tumor control is negatively affected by dose reduction.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective case review and analysis of patient data.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Patients with VSs who underwent GKRS between 1990 and 2007 at the authors' institution.

INTERVENTION(S)

The subjects were divided into two cohorts based on the prescribed doses of radiation received: a 12 Gy cohort (96 patients) with a follow-up period of 124 months and a >12 Gy cohort (118 patients) with a follow-up period of 143 months.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Tumor control rates at 10 to 15 years, frequency of facial and trigeminal nerve complications, and hearing function.

RESULTS

The 10 to 15-year tumor control rates were 95% in the 12 Gy cohort and 88% in the > 12 Gy cohort, but the differences were not significant. Compared with the >12 Gy cohort, facial and trigeminal nerve deficits occurred significantly less frequently in the 12 Gy cohort, with the 10-year cumulative, permanent deficit-free rates being 2% and 0%, respectively. Multivariate analyses revealed that treatment doses exceeding 12 Gy were associated with a significantly higher risk for cranial nerve deficits. The percentage of subjects retaining pure-tone average ≤ 50 dB at the final follow-up did not significantly differ between the cohorts (12 Gy cohort, 30% and >12 Gy cohort, 33%; p = 0.823).

CONCLUSIONS

Dose reduction to 12 Gy for GKRS to treat VSs decreased facial and trigeminal nerve complications without worsening tumor control rates.

Vestibular dose correlates with dizziness after radiosurgery for the treatment of vestibular schwannoma

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been recognized as a first-line treatment option for small to moderate sized vestibular schwannoma (VS). Our aim is to evaluate the impact of SRS doses and other patient and disease characteristics on vestibular function in patients with VS.

METHODS

Data on VS patients treated with single-fraction SRS to 12 Gy were retrospectively reviewed. No dose constraints were given to the vestibule during optimization in treatment planning. Patient and tumor characteristics, pre- and post-SRS vestibular examination results and patient-reported dizziness were assessed from patient records.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients were analyzed. Median follow-up was 32 months (range, 6-79). The median minimum, mean and maximum vestibular doses were 2.6 ± 1.6 Gy, 6.7 ± 2.8 Gy, and 11 ± 3.6 Gy, respectively. On univariate analysis, Koos grade (p = 0.04; OR: 3.45; 95% CI 1.01-11.81), tumor volume (median 6.1 cm3; range, 0.8-38; p = 0.01; OR: 4.85; 95% CI 1.43-16.49), presence of pre-SRS dizziness (p = 0.02; OR: 3.98; 95% CI 1.19-13.24) and minimum vestibular dose (p = 0.033; OR: 1.55; 95% CI 1.03-2.32) showed a significant association with patient-reported dizziness. On multivariate analysis, minimum vestibular dose remained significant (p = 0.02; OR: 1.75; 95% CI 1.05-2.89). Patients with improved caloric function had received significantly lower mean (1.5 ± 0.7 Gy, p = 0.01) and maximum doses (4 ± 1.5 Gy, p = 0.01) to the vestibule.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results reveal that 5 Gy and above minimum vestibular doses significantly worsened dizziness. Additionally, mean and maximum doses received by the vestibule were significantly lower in patients who had improved caloric function. Further investigations are needed to determine dose-volume parameters and their effects on vestibular toxicity.

The Effect of Prescription Isodose Variation on Tumor Control and Toxicities in Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Sporadic Vestibular Schwannoma: Propensity Score-Matched Case–Control Study

Objective Vestibular schwannoma (VS) treated with Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) was typically performed at 50% isodose line (IDL50); however, the impact of IDL variation on outcomes is poorly understood. This study aimed to compare tumor control (TC) and toxicities between treatment at 40% (IDL40) and 50% (IDL50).

Methods Sporadic/unilateral VS patients treated with SRS dose 12 to 14 Gy and prescription isodose volume ≤10cm3 were included. Propensity score matching was applied to IDL40 cohort to generate an IDL50 companion cohort, adjusting for age and prescription isodose volume. After exclusion of patients with follow-up <24 months, there were 30 and 28 patients in IDL40 and IDL50 cohorts, respectively.

Results Median follow-up time was 96 months (24–225 months). Actuarial and radiographic TC rates were 91.8% and clinical TC was 96.2% both at 5 and 10 years. TC was higher in IDL40 cohort but not significant (96.4 vs. 86.7%; p = 0.243). Hearing preservation (HP) rates were 71.9 and 39.2% at 5- and 10-year intervals, with significantly higher rates of HP noted in IDL40 cohort (83.3 vs. 57.1% at 5-year interval; 62.5 vs. 11.4% at 10-year interval; p = 0.017). Permanent facial neuropathy occurred in two patients, both from the IDL50 cohort (3.5%). Rates of post-SRS steroid treatment or shunt placement for hydrocephalus were slightly higher in IDL50 patients (6.9 vs. 17.9%; p = 0.208 and 3.3 vs. 7.1%; p = 0.532).

Conclusion For treatment of VS with SRS, dose prescription at IDL40 or IDL50 provides excellent long-term TC and toxicity profiles. IDL40 may be associated with improved long-term HP.

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannomas: Tumor Control Probability Analyses and Recommended Reporting Standards

PURPOSE

We sought to investigate the tumor control probability (TCP) of vestibular schwannomas after single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or hypofractionated SRS over 2 to 5 fractions (fSRS).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Studies (PubMed indexed from 1993-2017) were eligible for data extraction if they contained dosimetric details of SRS/fSRS correlated with local tumor control. The rate of tumor control at 5 years (or at 3 years if 5-year data were not available) were collated. Poisson modeling estimated the TCP per equivalent dose in 2 Gy per fraction (EQD2) and in 1, 3, and 5 fractions.

RESULTS

Data were extracted from 35 publications containing a total of 5162 patients. TCP modeling was limited by the absence of analyzable data of <11 Gy in a single-fraction, variability in definition of "tumor control," and by lack of significant increase in TCP for doses >12 Gy. Using linear-quadratic-based dose conversion, the 3- to 5-year TCP was estimated at 95% at an EQD2 of 25 Gy, corresponding to 1-, 3-, and 5-fraction doses of 13.8 Gy, 19.2 Gy, and 21.5 Gy, respectively. Single-fraction doses of 10 Gy, 11 Gy, 12 Gy, and 13 Gy predicted a TCP of 85.0%, 88.4%, 91.2%, and 93.5%, respectively. For fSRS, 18 Gy in 3 fractions (EQD2 of 23.0 Gy) and 25 Gy in 5 fractions (EQD2 of 30.2 Gy) corresponded to TCP of 93.6% and 97.2%. Overall, the quality of dosimetric reporting was poor; recommended reporting guidelines are presented.

CONCLUSIONS

With current typical SRS doses of 12 Gy in 1 fraction, 18 Gy in 3 fractions, and 25 Gy in 5 fractions, 3- to 5-year TCP exceeds 91%. To improve pooled data analyses to optimize treatment outcomes for patients with vestibular schwannoma, future reports of SRS should include complete dosimetric details with well-defined tumor control and toxicity endpoints.

Facial Nerve Outcomes After Vestibular Schwannoma Microsurgical Resection in Neurofibromatosis Type 2

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to investigate facial nerve outcomes after microsurgical resection in neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) compared to sporadic tumors.

STUDY DESIGN

Single institutional retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

METHODS

All adult patients with NF2 vestibular schwannoma (VS) or sporadic VS who underwent microsurgical resection from 2008 to 2019 with preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 1 year of postsurgical follow-up were included. The primary outcome measure was postoperative House-Brackmann (HB) facial nerve score measured at first postoperative visit and after at least 10 months.

RESULTS

In total, 161 sporadic VSs and 14 NF2 VSs met inclusion criteria. Both median tumor diameter (NF2, 33.5 mm vs sporadic, 24 mm, P = .0011) and median tumor volume (NF2, 12.4 cm³ vs sporadic, 2.9 cm³, P = .0005) were significantly greater in patients with NF2. The median follow-up was 24.9 months (range, 12-130.1). Median facial nerve function after 1 year for patients with NF2 was HB 3 (range, 1-6) compared to HB 1 (range, 1-6) for sporadic VS (P = .001). With multivariate logistic regression, NF2 tumors (odds ratio [OR] = 13.9, P = .001) and tumor volume ≥3 cm³ (OR = 3.6, P = .025) were significantly associated with HB ≥3 when controlling for age, sex, extent of tumor resection, translabyrinthine approach, and prior radiation.

CONCLUSION

Tumor volume >3 cm³ and NF2 tumors are associated with poorer facial nerve outcomes 1 year following microsurgical resection.

Early life-threating enlargement of a vestibular schwannoma after gamma knife radiosurgery

Stereotactic gamma knife radiosurgery (GKS) may induce a transient enlargement of vestibular schwannomas (VS). This phenomenon, known as pseudoprogression or swelling, starts at about 3 months following GKS, peaks at about 6 months, and typically subsides thereafter, usually without significant neurological deterioration. We describe a 34-year-old female who developed an aggressive enlargement of a VS 1 month after GKS. The patient was treated with an immediate external ventricular drainage and surgical resection via retrosigmoid approach for an acute neurological deterioration due to hydrocephalus and brainstem compression. Histopathological examination revealed a VS with abundant intratumoral thrombosis and necrosis, suggesting that its rapid expansion could be related to massive radiation-induced tumor necrosis. The present case indicated that rapid life-threating enlargement of a VS may occur as an early complication following GKS.

Outcome and toxicity analysis of single dose stereotactic radiosurgery in vestibular schwannoma based on the Koos grading system

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has evolved as widely accepted treatment option for small-sized (Koos I up to II) vestibular schwannoma (VS). For larger tumors (prevalent Koos VI), microsurgery or combined treatment strategies are mostly recommended. However, in patients not suited for microsurgery, SRS might also be an alternative to balance tumor control, hearing preservation and adverse effects. The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of SRS for VS with regard to different Koos grades. All patients with untreated VS who received SRS at our center were included. Outcome analysis included tumor control, preservation of serviceable hearing based on median pure tone averages (PTA), and procedure-related adverse events rated by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE; v4.03) classification. In total, 258 patients (median age 58 years, range 21-84) were identified with a mean follow-up of 52 months (range 3-228 months). Mean tumor volume was 1.8 ml (range 0.1-18.5). The mean marginal dose was 12.3 Gy ± 0.6 (range 11-13.5). The cohort was divided into two groups: A (Koos grades I and II, n = 186) and B (Koos grades III and IV, n = 72). The actuarial tumor control rate was 98% after 2 years and 90% after 5 and 10 years. Koos grading did not show a significant impact on tumor control (p = 0.632) or hearing preservation (p = 0.231). After SRS, 18 patients (7%) had new transient or permanent symptoms classified by the CTCAE. The actuarial rate of CTCAE-free survival was not related to Koos grading (p = 0.093). Based on this selected population of Koos grade III and IV VS without or with only mild symptoms from brainstem compression, SRS can be recommended as the primary therapy with the advantage of low morbidity and satisfactory tumor control. The overall hearing preservation rate and toxicity of SRS was influenced by age and cannot be predicted by tumor volume or Koos grading alone.

Progressive Vestibular Schwannoma following Subtotal or Near-Total Resection: Dose-Escalated versus Standard-Dose Salvage Stereotactic Radiosurgery

Objective  Local failure of incompletely resected vestibular schwannoma (VS) following salvage stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) using standard doses of 12 to 13 Gy is common. We hypothesized that dose-escalated SRS, corrected for biologically effective dose, would have superior local control of high-grade VS progressing after subtotal or near-total resection compared with standard-dose SRS. Design  Retrospective cohort study. Setting  Tertiary academic referral center. Participants  Adult patients treated with linear accelerator-based SRS for progressive VS following subtotal or near-total resection. Main Outcome Measures  Dose-escalated SRS was defined by a biologically effective dose exceeding a single-fraction 13-Gy regimen. Study outcomes were local control and neurologic sequelae of SRS. Binary logistic regression was used to evaluate predictors of study outcomes. Results  A total of 18 patients with progressive disease following subtotal (71%) and near-total (39%) resection of Koos grade IV disease (94%) were enrolled. Of the 18 patients, 7 were treated with dose-escalated SRS and 11 with standard-dose SRS. Over a median follow-up of 32 months after SRS, local control was 100% in the dose-escalated cohort and 91% in the standard-dose cohort ( p  = 0.95). Neurologic sequelae occurred in 28% of patients, including 60% of dose-escalated cohort and 40% of the standard-dose cohort ( p  = 0.12), although permanent neurologic sequelae were low at 6%. Conclusions  Dose-escalated SRS has similar local control of recurrent VS following progression after subtotal or near-total resection and does not appear to have higher neurologic sequalae. Larger studies are needed.

Clinical Practice Guideline: Sudden Hearing Loss (Update)

OBJECTIVE

Sudden hearing loss is a frightening symptom that often prompts an urgent or emergent visit to a health care provider. It is frequently but not universally accompanied by tinnitus and/or vertigo. Sudden sensorineural hearing loss affects 5 to 27 per 100,000 people annually, with about 66,000 new cases per year in the United States. This guideline update provides evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis, management, and follow-up of patients who present with sudden hearing loss. It focuses on sudden sensorineural hearing loss in adult patients aged ≥18 years and primarily on those with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Prompt recognition and management of sudden sensorineural hearing loss may improve hearing recovery and patient quality of life. The guideline update is intended for all clinicians who diagnose or manage adult patients who present with sudden hearing loss.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this guideline update is to provide clinicians with evidence-based recommendations in evaluating patients with sudden hearing loss and sudden sensorineural hearing loss, with particular emphasis on managing idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss. The guideline update group recognized that patients enter the health care system with sudden hearing loss as a nonspecific primary complaint. Therefore, the initial recommendations of this guideline update address distinguishing sensorineural hearing loss from conductive hearing loss at the time of presentation with hearing loss. They also clarify the need to identify rare, nonidiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss to help separate those patients from those with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss, who are the target population for the therapeutic interventions that make up the bulk of the guideline update. By focusing on opportunities for quality improvement, this guideline should improve diagnostic accuracy, facilitate prompt intervention, decrease variations in management, reduce unnecessary tests and imaging procedures, and improve hearing and rehabilitative outcomes for affected patients.

METHODS

Consistent with the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation's "Clinical Practice Guideline Development Manual, Third Edition" (Rosenfeld et al. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;148[1]:S1-S55), the guideline update group was convened with representation from the disciplines of otolaryngology-head and neck surgery, otology, neurotology, family medicine, audiology, emergency medicine, neurology, radiology, advanced practice nursing, and consumer advocacy. A systematic review of the literature was performed, and the prior clinical practice guideline on sudden hearing loss was reviewed in detail. Key Action Statements (KASs) were updated with new literature, and evidence profiles were brought up to the current standard. Research needs identified in the original clinical practice guideline and data addressing them were reviewed. Current research needs were identified and delineated.

RESULTS

The guideline update group made strong recommendations for the following: (KAS 1) Clinicians should distinguish sensorineural hearing loss from conductive hearing loss when a patient first presents with sudden hearing loss. (KAS 7) Clinicians should educate patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss about the natural history of the condition, the benefits and risks of medical interventions, and the limitations of existing evidence regarding efficacy. (KAS 13) Clinicians should counsel patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss who have residual hearing loss and/or tinnitus about the possible benefits of audiologic rehabilitation and other supportive measures. These strong recommendations were modified from the initial clinical practice guideline for clarity and timing of intervention. The guideline update group made strong recommendations against the following: (KAS 3) Clinicians should not order routine computed tomography of the head in the initial evaluation of a patient with presumptive sudden sensorineural hearing loss. (KAS 5) Clinicians should not obtain routine laboratory tests in patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss. (KAS 11) Clinicians should not routinely prescribe antivirals, thrombolytics, vasodilators, or vasoactive substances to patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss. The guideline update group made recommendations for the following: (KAS 2) Clinicians should assess patients with presumptive sudden sensorineural hearing loss through history and physical examination for bilateral sudden hearing loss, recurrent episodes of sudden hearing loss, and/or focal neurologic findings. (KAS 4) In patients with sudden hearing loss, clinicians should obtain, or refer to a clinician who can obtain, audiometry as soon as possible (within 14 days of symptom onset) to confirm the diagnosis of sudden sensorineural hearing loss. (KAS 6) Clinicians should evaluate patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss for retrocochlear pathology by obtaining magnetic resonance imaging or auditory brainstem response. (KAS 10) Clinicians should offer, or refer to a clinician who can offer, intratympanic steroid therapy when patients have incomplete recovery from sudden sensorineural hearing loss 2 to 6 weeks after onset of symptoms. (KAS 12) Clinicians should obtain follow-up audiometric evaluation for patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss at the conclusion of treatment and within 6 months of completion of treatment. These recommendations were clarified in terms of timing of intervention and audiometry and method of retrocochlear workup. The guideline update group offered the following KASs as options: (KAS 8) Clinicians may offer corticosteroids as initial therapy to patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss within 2 weeks of symptom onset. (KAS 9a) Clinicians may offer, or refer to a clinician who can offer, hyperbaric oxygen therapy combined with steroid therapy within 2 weeks of onset of sudden sensorineural hearing loss. (KAS 9b) Clinicians may offer, or refer to a clinician who can offer, hyperbaric oxygen therapy combined with steroid therapy as salvage therapy within 1 month of onset of sudden sensorineural hearing loss.

DIFFERENCES FROM PRIOR GUIDELINE

Incorporation of new evidence profiles to include quality improvement opportunities, confidence in the evidence, and differences of opinion Included 10 clinical practice guidelines, 29 new systematic reviews, and 36 new randomized controlled trials Highlights the urgency of evaluation and initiation of treatment, if treatment is offered, by emphasizing the time from symptom occurrence Clarification of terminology by changing potentially unclear statements; use of the term sudden sensorineural hearing loss to mean idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss to emphasize that >90% of sudden sensorineural hearing loss is idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss and to avoid confusion in nomenclature for the reader Changes to the KASs from the original guideline: KAS 1-When a patient first presents with sudden hearing loss, conductive hearing loss should be distinguished from sensorineural. KAS 2-The utility of history and physical examination when assessing for modifying factors is emphasized. KAS 3-The word "routine" is added to clarify that this statement addresses nontargeted head computerized tomography scan that is often ordered in the emergency room setting for patients presenting with sudden hearing loss. It does not refer to targeted scans, such as temporal bone computerized tomography scan, to assess for temporal bone pathology. KAS 4-The importance of audiometric confirmation of hearing status as soon as possible and within 14 days of symptom onset is emphasized. KAS 5-New studies were added to confirm the lack of benefit of nontargeted laboratory testing in sudden sensorineural hearing loss. KAS 6-Audiometric follow-up is excluded as a reasonable workup for retrocochlear pathology. Magnetic resonance imaging, computerized tomography scan if magnetic resonance imaging cannot be done, and, secondarily, auditory brainstem response evaluation are the modalities recommended. A time frame for such testing is not specified, nor is it specified which clinician should be ordering this workup; however, it is implied that it would be the general or subspecialty otolaryngologist. KAS 7-The importance of shared decision making is highlighted, and salient points are emphasized. KAS 8-The option for corticosteroid intervention within 2 weeks of symptom onset is emphasized. KAS 9-Changed to KAS 9A and 9B. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy remains an option but only when combined with steroid therapy for either initial treatment (9A) or salvage therapy (9B). The timing of initial therapy is within 2 weeks of onset, and that of salvage therapy is within 1 month of onset of sudden sensorineural hearing loss. KAS 10-Intratympanic steroid therapy for salvage is recommended within 2 to 6 weeks following onset of sudden sensorineural hearing loss. The time to treatment is defined and emphasized. KAS 11-Antioxidants were removed from the list of interventions that the clinical practice guideline recommends against using. KAS 12-Follow-up audiometry at conclusion of treatment and also within 6 months posttreatment is added. KAS 13-This statement on audiologic rehabilitation includes patients who have residual hearing loss and/or tinnitus who may benefit from treatment. Addition of an algorithm outlining KASs Enhanced emphasis on patient education and shared decision making with tools provided to assist in same.

Clinical Results After Single-fraction Radiosurgery for 1,002 Vestibular Schwannomas

Background

Herein, we report clinical results for patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for vestibular schwannomas (VS) over a period of 10 years.

Methods

Clinical data and imaging follow-up were stored in a database of 1,378 patients, with 1,384 VS treated consecutively between 2005 and 2018 and analyzed retrospectively. A total of 996 patients with 1,002 tumors with at least one year of follow-up were included for analysis.

Results

Median follow-up was 3·6 years (1-12·5 years). The three, five, and 10-year Kaplan-Meier estimated local tumor control was 96·6%, 92·3%, and 90·8%, respectively. The median hearing loss of the affected ear as compared to its healthy counterpart was 17 dB at treatment start and increased to 23 and 29 dB at one and five years. Six patients (0·6%) developed symptomatic hydrocephalus and underwent the placement of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt. In 30 patients (3·0%), trigeminal sensory dysfunction developed, five patients (0·5%) had a mild transient weakness, and nine patients (0·9%) had a permanent facial weakness (House-Brackmann Grade > II) after SRS.

Conclusion

Single fraction SRS proves to be highly effective and shows low treatment-related toxicity for VS. SRS should be considered a primary treatment option for small and middle-sized VS.

Facial Nerve Paralysis Occurring 4 Days following Stereotactic Radiosurgery for a Vestibular Schwannoma

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is commonly used for the treatment of vestibular schwannomas given its high rate of tumor control and low rate of complications. Facial nerve palsy has been reported several months after treatment as a rare late complication of SRS. Here, we report a case of facial weakness occurring only 4 days after treatment and discuss potential etiology and management considerations.

Surgical outcome in smaller symptomatic vestibular schwannomas. Is there a role for surgery?

BACKGROUND

Currently, there is no consensus in the initial management of small vestibular schwannomas (VSs). They are routinely watched and/or referred for radiosurgical treatment, although surgical removal is also an option. We hereby evaluate clinical outcomes of patients who have undergone surgical removal of smaller symptomatic VSs.

METHODS

Patients with vestibular schwannomas (grade T1-T3b according to Hannover classification) were reviewed. Patients with symptomatic tumors who underwent surgery were evaluated. Their preoperative hearing status was based on the guideline of the committee on hearing and equilibrium of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) foundation. Their postoperative facial nerve function, hearing status, vestibular symptoms, and degree of tumor resection were assessed.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were selected for surgery via a retrosigmoid approach based on their age, symptoms, and their own decision-making after discussion of management options. Most patients presented with hearing loss. Seventeen patients had useful hearing preoperatively. Among them, 10 patients (59%) preserved useful hearing (class A or B) postoperatively. MRI at 1-year follow-up confirmed complete resection in 26/29 patients. Also, 29 patients (97%) had HB grade I-II, and 1 patient had HB III at 1-year follow-up. Except for 1 patient with CSF leak, 1 patient with delayed facial nerve palsy, and 2 patients with asymptomatic sigmoid sinus occlusion, there were no other new morbidities.

CONCLUSION

Although both observation and radiosurgery are valid options in the management of smaller size vestibular schwannomas, surgical treatment seems to offer a high rate of facial nerve preservation, a reasonable rate of hearing sparing, and a high total resection rate. Clinicians should consider surgical treatment as a valid option in the initial management of symptomatic small vestibular schwannomas in younger patients.

Management of Vestibular Schwannomas with Linear Accelerator-Based Stereotactic Radiosurgery: A Single Center Experience

Aims and background

The primary goal of treatment for vestibular schwannoma is to achieve local control without comprimising regional cranial nerve function. Stereotactic radiosurgery has emerged as a viable therapeutic option for vestibular schwannoma. The aim of the study is to report our 15-year single center experience using linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiosurgery in the management of patients with vestibular schwannoma.

Methods and study design

Between July 1998 and January 2013, 68 patients with unilateral vestibular schwannoma were treated using stereotactic radiosurgery at the Department of Radiation Oncology, Gulhane Military Medical Academy. All patients underwent high-precision stereotactic radiosurgery using a linear accelerator with 6-MV photons.

Results

Median follow-up time was 51 months (range, 9–107). Median age was 45 years (range, 20–77). Median dose was 12 Gy (range, 10–13) prescribed to the 85%-95% isodose line encompassing the target volume. Local tumor control in patients with periodic follow-up imaging was 96.1%. Overall hearing preservation rate was 76.5%.

Conclusions

Linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiosurgery offers a safe and effective treatment for patients with vestibular schwannoma by providing high local control rates along with improved quality of life through well-preserved hearing function.

Impact of Cochlear Dose on Hearing Preservation following Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Vestibular Schwannoma

Objective  The objective of this study was to examine the effect of cochlear dose on hearing preservation in stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (fSRT) for vestibular schwannoma (VS). Design  This is a retrospective case-control study. Setting  This study was completed at the Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, a university-affiliated tertiary care center. Participants  Patients who underwent SRS (marginal dose of 12 Gy) or fSRT (marginal dose of 50.4 Gy) procedures for VS were included in the study. Main Outcome Measures  The main outcome measure was hearing preservation. Audiometric data, when available, were used to determine the level of hearing according to the Gardner Robertson scale. Results  A total of 38 patients (14 SRS and 24 fSRT) were analyzed. SRS patients with decreased hearing received a significantly higher minimum cochlear dose (7.41 vs. 4.24 Gy, p  = 0.02) as compared with those with stable hearing. In fSRT patients, there were no significant differences in cochlear dose for patients with decreased hearing as compared with those with stable hearing. For SRS patients, who received a minimum cochlear dose above 6 Gy, there was a significant risk of decreased hearing preservation (odds ratio: 32, p  = 0.02). Conclusion  Higher minimum cochlear dose was predictive of decreased hearing preservation following SRS. Though the study is low powered, the radiation dose to the cochlea should be a parameter that is considered when planning SRS or fSRT therapies for patients with VS.

Patient- versus physician-reported facial disability in vestibular schwannoma: an international cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

Patient-reported outcomes are increasingly used in studies of vestibular schwannoma (VS); however, few studies have examined self-evaluated facial nerve function and its relation to physician-reported outcomes. The primary objective of this study was to compare patient self-evaluations of facial disability with physician-evaluated facial nerve status and with self-evaluations of a healthy control group. The second objective was to provide insight into the controversial subject of the optimal initial management of small- and medium-sized VSs; consequently, the authors compared patient-reported facial nerve disability following treatment via observation (OBS), Gamma Knife surgery (GKS), or microsurgery (MS). Lastly, the authors sought to identify risk factors for facial nerve dysfunction following treatment for small- and medium-sized VSs.

METHODS

All patients with a VS 3 cm or smaller that was singly treated with OBS, GKS, or MS at either of 2 independent treatment centers between 1998 and 2008 were retrospectively identified. Longitudinal facial nerve measures and clinical data, including facial nerve evaluation according to the House-Brackmann (HB) grading system, were extracted from existing VS databases. Supplementing the objective data were Facial Disability Index (FDI) scores, which were obtained via survey of patients a mean of 7.7 years after initial treatment.

RESULTS

The response rate among the 682 eligible patients was 79%; thus, data from a total of 539 patients were analyzed. One hundred forty-eight patients had been managed by OBS, 247 with GKS, and 144 with MS. Patients who underwent microsurgery had larger tumors and were younger than those who underwent OBS or GKS. Overall, facial nerve outcomes were satisfactory following treatment, with more than 90% of patients having HB Grade I function at the last clinical follow-up. Treatment was the major risk factor for facial nerve dysfunction. Almost one-fifth of the patients treated with MS had an objective decline in facial nerve function, whereas only 2% in the GKS group and 0% in the OBS cohort had a decline. The physical subscale of the FDI in the VS patients was highly associated with HB grade; however, the social/well-being subscale of the FDI was not. Thus, any social disability caused by facial palsy was not detectable by use of this questionnaire.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients with small- and medium-sized VSs attain excellent long-term facial nerve function and low facial nerve disability regardless of treatment modality. Tumor size and microsurgical treatment are risk factors for facial nerve dysfunction and self-reported disability. The FDI questionnaire is sensitive to the physical but not the social impairment associated with facial dysfunction.

Trigeminal neuralgia and neuropathy in large sporadic vestibular schwannomas

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence, presentation, and treatment outcomes of trigeminal nerve–mediated symptoms secondary to large vestibular schwannomas (VSs) with trigeminal nerve contact. Specifically, the symptomatic results of pain, paresthesias, and numbness after microsurgical resection or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) were examined.

METHODS

The authors conducted a retrospective review of a database for concomitant diagnosis of trigeminal neuralgia (TN) or trigeminal neuropathy and VS between 1994 and 2014 at a tertiary academic center. All patients with VS with TN or neuropathy were included, with the exception of those patients with neurofibromatosis Type 2 and patients who elected observation. Patient demographic data, symptom evolution, and treatment outcomes were collected. Population data were summarized, and outcome comparisons between microsurgery and SRS were analyzed at last follow-up.

RESULTS

Sixty (2.2%) of 2771 total patients who had large VSs and either TN or neuropathy symptoms met inclusion criteria. The average age of trigeminal symptom onset was 53.6 years (range 24–79 years), the average age at VS diagnosis was 54.4 years (range 25–79 years), and the average follow-up for the microsurgery and SRS groups was 30 and 59 months, respectively (range 3–132 months). Of these patients, 50 (83%) had facial numbness, 16 (27%) had TN pain, and 13 (22%) had paresthesias (i.e., burning or tingling). Subsequently, 50 (83%) patients underwent resection and 10 (17%) patients received SRS.

Treatment of VS with SRS did not improve trigeminal symptoms in any patient. This included 2 subjects with unimproved facial numbness and 4 patients with worsened numbness. Similarly, SRS worsened TN pain and paresthesias in 5 patients and failed to improve pain in 2 additional patients. The Barrow Neurological Institute neuralgia and hypesthesia scale scores were significantly worse for patients undergoing SRS compared with microsurgery.

Resection alleviated facial numbness in 22 (50%) patients, paresthesias in 5 (42%) patients, and TN in 7 (70%) patients. In several patients, surgery was not successful in relieving facial numbness, which failed to improve in 17 (39%) cases and became worse in 5 (11%) cases. Also, surgery did not change the intensity of facial paresthesias or neuralgia in 6 (50%) and 3 (25%) patients, respectively. Microsurgery exacerbated facial paresthesias in 1 (8%) patient but, notably, did not aggravate TN in any patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, resection of large VSs provided improved outcomes for patients with concomitant TN, facial paresthesia, and numbness compared with SRS. However, caution should be used when counseling surgical candidates because a number of patients did not experience improvement. This was especially true in patients with preoperative facial numbness and paresthesias, who frequently reported that these symptoms were unchanged following surgery.

Predictive Factors of Unfavorable Events After Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannoma

OBJECTIVE

Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKS) for the treatment of vestibular schwannoma (VS) introduces risks to the facial nerve and auditory perception and may involve post-treatment complications such as pseudoprogression, hydrocephalus, and other cranial neuropathies. This study of patients with VS who underwent GKS investigated radiosurgical results, focusing on post-treatment complications and identifying the factors that predict such complications.

METHODS

We undertook a retrospective review of all VS patients treated with the Perfexion Leksell Gamma Knife between November 2007 and October 2010 at our institution. Patients who underwent at least 12 months of clinical and radiologic assessments before and after GKS were included.

RESULTS

All 235 patients were included in the analyses reported here. The 5-year serviceable hearing and facial nerve preservation values were 73.9% and 94.3%, respectively. Following GKS, 43 patients (18.30%) showed pseudoprogression, 15 (6.38%) exhibited hydrocephalus, 22 (9.36%) showed trigeminal neuropathy, 14 (5.96%) showed vertigo, and 25 (10.64%) showed facial myokymia. According to multivariate analysis, solid tumor nature was significantly associated with pseudoprogression and patient age was significantly associated with hydrocephalus. Patients receiving margin doses ≥13 Gy had a significantly higher probability of loss of serviceable hearing. Patients with smaller tumors had a trigeminal nerve preservation rate comparable with patients harboring larger tumors. Patients receiving margin doses <13 Gy or older patients had a significantly higher probability of vestibular nerve dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

Further prospective studies should be designed to provide further insight into the exact relationship between the predictive factors we investigated and post-treatment complications.

Preserving normal facial nerve function and improving hearing outcome in large vestibular schwannomas with a combined approach: planned subtotal resection followed by gamma knife radiosurgery

Objective

To perform planned subtotal resection followed by gamma knife surgery (GKRS) in a series of patients with large vestibular schwannoma (VS), aiming at an optimal functional outcome for facial and cochlear nerves.

Methods

Patient characteristics, surgical and dosimetric features, and outcome were collected prospectively at the time of treatment and during the follow-up.

Results

A consecutive series of 32 patients was treated between July 2010 and June 2016. Mean follow-up after surgery was 29 months (median 24, range 4–78). Mean presurgical tumor volume was 12.5 cm³ (range 1.47–34.9). Postoperative status showed normal facial nerve function (House–Brackmann I) in all patients. In a subgroup of 17 patients with serviceable hearing before surgery and in which cochlear nerve preservation was attempted at surgery, 16 (94.1%) retained serviceable hearing. Among them, 13 had normal hearing (Gardner–Robertson class 1) before surgery, and 10 (76.9%) retained normal hearing after surgery. Mean duration between surgery and GKRS was 6.3 months (range 3.8–13.9). Mean tumor volume at GKRS was 3.5 cm³ (range 0.5–12.8), corresponding to mean residual volume of 29.4% (range 6–46.7) of the preoperative volume. Mean marginal dose was 12 Gy (range 11–12). Mean follow-up after GKRS was 24 months (range 3–60). Following GKRS, there were no new neurological deficits, with facial and hearing functions remaining identical to those after surgery in all patients. Three patients presented with continuous growth after GKRS, were considered failures, and benefited from the same combined approach a second time.

Conclusion

Our data suggest that large VS management, with planned subtotal resection followed by GKRS, might yield an excellent clinical outcome, allowing the normal facial nerve and a high level of cochlear nerve functions to be retained. Our functional results with this approach in large VS are comparable with those obtained with GKRS alone in small- and medium-sized VS. Longer term follow-up is necessary to fully evaluate this approach, especially regarding tumor control.

Low-Dose Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannomas: Tumor Control and Cranial Nerve Function Preservation After 11 Gy

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to report tumor control rates and cranial nerve function after low dose (11.0 Gy) Gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) in patients with vestibular schwannomas.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed on 30 consecutive patients with vestibular schwannomas treated from March 2004 to August 2010 with GKRS at the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University. The marginal dose for all patients was 11.0 Gy prescribed to the 50% isodose line. Median follow-up time was 42 months. The median treatment volume was 0.53 cm3. Hearing data were obtained from audiometry reports before and after radiosurgery.

RESULTS

The actuarial progression free survival (PFS) based on freedom from surgery was 100% at 5 years. PFS based on freedom from persistent growth was 91% at 5 years. One patient experienced tumor progression requiring resection at 87 months. Serviceable hearing, defined as Gardner-Robertson score of I-II, was preserved in 50% of patients. On univariate and multivariate analyses, only higher mean and maximum dose to the cochlea significantly decreased the proportion of patients with serviceable hearing.

CONCLUSION

Vestibular schwannomas can be treated with low doses (11.0 Gy) of GKRS with good tumor control and cranial nerve preservation.

A matched cohort comparison of clinical outcomes following microsurgical resection or stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with small- and medium-sized vestibular schwannomas

OBJECTIVE

A randomized trial that compares clinical outcomes following microsurgery (MS) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for patients with small- and medium-sized vestibular schwannomas (VSs) is impractical, but would have important implications for clinical decision making. A matched cohort analysis was conducted to evaluate clinical outcomes in patients treated with MS or SRS.

METHODS

The records of 399 VS patients who were cared for by 2 neurosurgeons and 1 neurotologist between 2001 and 2014 were evaluated. From this data set, 3 retrospective matched cohorts were created to compare hearing preservation (21 matched pairs), facial nerve preservation (83 matched pairs), intervention-free survival, and complication rates (85 matched pairs) between cases managed with SRS and patients managed with MS. Cases were matched for age at surgery (± 10 years) and lesion size (± 0.1 cm). To compare hearing outcomes, cases were additionally matched for preoperative Class A hearing according to the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery guidelines. To compare facial nerve (i.e., cranial nerve [CN] VII) outcomes, cases were additionally matched for preoperative House-Brackmann (HB) score. Investigators who were not involved with patient care reviewed the clinical and imaging records. The reported outcomes were as assessed at the time of the last follow-up, unless otherwise stated.

RESULTS

The preservation of preoperative Class A hearing status was achieved in 14.3% of MS cases compared with 42.9% of SRS cases (OR 4.5; p < 0.05) after an average follow-up interval of 43.7 months and 30.3 months, respectively. Serviceable hearing was preserved in 42.8% of MS cases compared with 85.7% of SRS cases (OR 8.0; p < 0.01). The rates of postoperative CN VII dysfunction were low for both groups, although significantly higher in the MS group (HB III–IV 11% vs 0% for SRS; OR 21.3; p < 0.01) at a median follow-up interval of 35.7 and 19.0 months for MS and SRS, respectively. There was no difference in the need for subsequent intervention (2 MS patients and 2 SRS patients).

CONCLUSIONS

At this high-volume center, VS resection or radiosurgery for tumors ≤ 2.8 cm in diameter was associated with low overall morbidity. The need for subsequent intervention was the same in both groups. SRS was associated with improved hearing and facial preservation rates and reduced morbidity, but with a shorter average follow-up period. Facial function was excellent in both groups. Since patients were not randomly selected for surgery, different clinical outcomes may be of different value to individual patients. Both anticipated medical outcomes and patient goals remain the drivers of treatment decisions.

Facial and Cochlear Nerve Complications following Microsurgical Resection of Vestibular Schwannomas in a Series of 221 Cases

Background

Despite improvements in microsurgical technique and the use of intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring, the potential for facial and cochlear nerve injury remains a possibility in the resection of vestibular schwannomas (VS). We reviewed a series of 221 cases of VS resected via a retrosigmoid approach at our institution from October 2008 to April 2014 and determined the incidence of postoperative facial and cochlear deficits.

Material/Methods

A total of 221 patients – 105 (47.5%) male and 116 (52.5%) female – with a mean age of 46.1 years (range 29–73 years), with VS ≥3 cm (n=183, 82.8%) and <3 cm (n=38, 17.2%) underwent surgical resection via a retrosigmoid approach and were evaluated for postoperative facial and cochlear nerve deficits.

Results

Near-total resection (>95% removal) was achieved in 199 cases (90%) and subtotal resection (>90% removal) in 22 cases (10%). At 6 month follow-up, House-Brackmann grades I–III were observed in 183 cases (82.8%), grade IV in 16 cases (7.2%), and grade V in 22 cases (10%). Of the 10 patients that had preoperative functional hearing, 3 (33%) retained hearing postoperatively. Cerebrospinal fluid leakage occurred in 6 patients (2.7%), lower cranial nerve palsies in 9 patients (4.1%), and intracranial hematomas 3 cases (1.4%).

Conclusions

The observed incidence of persistent postoperative nerve deficits is very low. Meticulous microsurgical dissection of and around the facial and cochlear nerves with the aid of intraoperative electrophysiological nerve monitoring in the retrosigmoid approach allows for near-total resection of medium and large VS with the possibility of preservation of facial and cochlear nerve function.

Linear accelerator radiosurgery for vestibular schwannomas: Results of medium-term follow-up

BACKGROUND

To examine tumour control, via volume changes, and the complications of linear accelerator (LINAC)-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) treatment of vestibular schwannomas (VSs) on medium-term follow-up.

METHODS

Between September 2003 and November 2009 fifty consecutive patients with VSs treated with SRS using a marginal dose of 12.5 Gy utilizing a LINAC equipped with a micro-multileaf collimator were identified. Evaluation included serial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and neurological and hearing examinations.

RESULTS

The median tumour volume at treatment was 2.4 (range: 0.24-10.59) cm3. The intracranial diameter of the tumours ranged between 7.7 and 28.7 (median: 15.8) mm. Follow-up MRI was available for analysis on 49 patients. The median radiological follow-up period was 5.8 (range: 1.4-9.2) years. The median tumour volume at last follow-up was 1.1 (range: 0.03-5.3) cm3. VS decreased in size in 45 (90%) patients, with a median reduction in tumour volume of 1.46 (range: 0.06-9.29) cm3 or a median tumour size reduction of 59% of the baseline (range: 6-90%) in these patients. VS remained stable in 2 patients and increased in size in 2 patients. Only 1 patient (2%) required additional intervention (surgery). 15 patients had useful hearing pre-treatment; 10 post-treatment pure-tone audiograms of these patients were available. 5 (50%) patients still had useful hearing post treatment. Non-auditory adverse radiation effects included new (House-Brackmann grade II) or worsened facial nerve palsy (House-Brackmann grade II to grade V) in 2 (4%) patients and trigeminal sensory disturbance in 2 (4%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

At medium term, the vast majority of VSs treated with LINAC-based SRS exhibit tumour shrinkage. The slightly higher rate of facial nerve palsy compared with Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) results may be related to the learning curve. Other complications were similar to reported GKS results for VSs of comparable sizes.