1
|
Rapp SR, Dressler EV, Brown WM, Wade JL, Le-Lindqwister N, King D, Rowland KM, Weaver KE, Klepin HD, Shaw EG, Lesser GJ. Phase III Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial of Donepezil for Treatment of Cognitive Impairment in Breast Cancer Survivors After Adjuvant Chemotherapy (WF-97116). J Clin Oncol 2024:JCO2301100. [PMID: 38709986 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Revised: 11/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To test efficacy of donepezil, a cognitive enhancer, to improve memory in breast cancer survivors who report cancer-related cognitive impairment 1-5 years postchemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Adult female BCS exposed to ≥4 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy 1-5 years before enrollment who reported cancer-related cognitive impairment were eligible. Participants, enrolled at sites affiliated with the Wake Forest NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) Research Base, were randomly assigned to receive 5 mg of donepezil once daily for 6 weeks titrated to 10 mg once daily for 18 weeks or placebo. Cognition and self-report cognitive functioning was assessed at baseline, 12, 24 (end of intervention), and 36 (washout) weeks postrandomization. Mixed-effects repeated measures analysis of covariance models were used to assess treatment differences in immediate recall (primary outcome) on the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) and other cognitive domains (secondary outcomes) with covariates of treatment, time, time by treatment interaction, baseline outcome level, age stratification, and an unstructured covariance matrix to account for within participant correlation over time. RESULTS Two hundred seventy-six BCS from 87 NCORP practices (mean age, 57.1, standard deviation [SD], 10.5) who were at a mean of 29.6 months (SD, 14.2) postchemotherapy were randomly assigned to donepezil (n = 140) or placebo (n = 136). At 24 weeks, treatment groups did not differ on HVLT-R scores (donepezil mean = 25.98, placebo = 26.50, P = .32). There were no statistically significant differences between treatments at 12, 24, or 36 weeks for attention, executive function, verbal fluency, processing speed, or self-reported cognitive functioning. Endocrine therapy and menopausal status did not affect results. CONCLUSION BCS 1-5 years after completing chemotherapy with documented memory problems, randomly assigned to 24 weeks of 5-10 mg of donepezil once daily, did not perform differently at the end of treatment on tests of memory, other cognitive functions, or subjective functioning than those randomly assigned to placebo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen R Rapp
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
- Department of Social Sciences & Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Emily V Dressler
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - W Mark Brown
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - James L Wade
- Heartland Cancer Research NCORP, Cancer Care Specialists of Illinois-Decatur, Decatur, IL
| | | | - David King
- Metro Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Unity Hospital, Minneapolis-St Paul, MN
| | - Kendrith M Rowland
- Carle Cancer Center NCORP, Cancer Center at Illinois, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign, IL
| | - Kathryn E Weaver
- Department of Social Sciences & Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Heidi D Klepin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section on Hematology and Oncology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Edward G Shaw
- Department of Internal Medicine-Gerontology & Geriatrics Section, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Glenn J Lesser
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section on Hematology and Oncology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nakamura ZM, Deal AM, Park EM, Stanton KE, Lopez YE, Quillen LJ, O'Hare Kelly E, Heiling HM, Nyrop KA, Ray EM, Dees EC, Reeder-Hayes KE, Jolly TA, Carey LA, Abdou Y, Olajide OA, Rauch JK, Joseph R, Copeland A, McNamara MA, Ahles TA, Muss HB. A phase II single-arm trial of memantine for prevention of cognitive decline during chemotherapy in patients with early breast cancer: Feasibility, tolerability, acceptability, and preliminary effects. Cancer Med 2023; 12:8172-8183. [PMID: 36645168 PMCID: PMC10134315 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2022] [Revised: 12/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/31/2022] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cognitive difficulties have been described after chemotherapy for breast cancer, but there is no standard of care to improve cognitive outcomes in these patients. This trial examined the feasibility, tolerability, acceptability, and preliminary effects of memantine to prevent cognitive decline during chemotherapy for breast cancer. METHODS Patients with stage I-III breast cancer, scheduled for neo/adjuvant chemotherapy, completed a cognitive battery prior to and 4 weeks after completing chemotherapy. Memantine (10 mg BID) was administered concurrent with chemotherapy. Our primary cognitive outcome was visual working memory assessed by the Delayed Matching to Sample test. We used the Brief Medication Questionnaire to assess acceptability. RESULTS Of 126 patients approached, 56 (44%) enrolled. Forty-five (80%) received ≥1 dose of memantine and completed pre-post assessments. Seventy-six percent reported taking ≥90% of scheduled doses. Participants were mean age of 56, 77% White, and 57% had stage I disease. Sixty-four percent had stable or improved Delayed Matching to Sample test scores. Stable or improved cognition was observed in 87%-91% across objective cognitive domain composite measures. Sixty-six percent self-reported stable or improved cognitive symptoms. There were seven greater than or equal to grade 3 adverse events; two were possibly related to memantine. Only 5% reported that taking memantine was a disruption to their lives. CONCLUSIONS Memantine was well-tolerated and consistently taken by a large majority of patients receiving breast cancer chemotherapy. The majority demonstrated stable or improved cognition from pre- to post-assessment. Randomized trials are needed to determine memantine's efficacy to ameliorate cognitive loss. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04033419.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zev M Nakamura
- Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Allison M Deal
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Eliza M Park
- Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kate E Stanton
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Yesy E Lopez
- Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Laura J Quillen
- Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Erin O'Hare Kelly
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Hillary M Heiling
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kirsten A Nyrop
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Emily M Ray
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - E Claire Dees
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Katherine E Reeder-Hayes
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Trevor A Jolly
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Lisa A Carey
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Yara Abdou
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Julia K Rauch
- Rex Hematology Oncology Associates, Rex Cancer Care, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ranjit Joseph
- Rex Hematology Oncology Associates, Rex Cancer Care, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA
| | - Anureet Copeland
- Rex Hematology Oncology Associates, Rex Cancer Care, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA
| | - Megan A McNamara
- Rex Hematology Oncology Associates, Rex Cancer Care, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA
| | - Tim A Ahles
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Hyman B Muss
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Al Dahhan NZ, Cox E, Nieman BJ, Mabbott DJ. Cross-translational models of late-onset cognitive sequelae and their treatment in pediatric brain tumor survivors. Neuron 2022; 110:2215-2241. [PMID: 35523175 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2022.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Revised: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 04/08/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Pediatric brain tumor treatments have a high success rate, but survivors are at risk of cognitive sequelae that impact long-term quality of life. We summarize recent clinical and animal model research addressing pathogenesis or evaluating candidate interventions for treatment-induced cognitive sequelae. Assayed interventions encompass a broad range of approaches, including modifications to radiotherapy, modulation of immune response, prevention of treatment-induced cell loss or promotion of cell renewal, manipulation of neuronal signaling, and lifestyle/environmental adjustments. We further emphasize the potential of neuroimaging as a key component of cross-translation to contextualize laboratory research within broader clinical findings. This cross-translational approach has the potential to accelerate discovery to improve pediatric cancer survivors' long-term quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noor Z Al Dahhan
- Neurosciences and Mental Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Elizabeth Cox
- Neurosciences and Mental Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Brian J Nieman
- Translational Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada; Mouse Imaging Centre, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Donald J Mabbott
- Neurosciences and Mental Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Psychology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rehabilitation of Adult Patients with Primary Brain Tumors. CURRENT PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION REPORTS 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s40141-022-00345-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
5
|
Medical and Neurological Management of Brain Tumor Complications. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2021; 21:53. [PMID: 34545509 DOI: 10.1007/s11910-021-01142-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The diagnosis of brain tumors often leads to complications that are either related to the tumor itself or the tumor-directed and supportive therapies, increasing the burden on the patients' quality of life and even survival. This article reviews the medical and neurological conditions that commonly complicate the disease course of brain tumors patients. RECENT FINDINGS Various mechanisms have been newly identified to be involved in the pathophysiology of seizures and brain edema and can help advance the treatment of such complications. There have also been new developments in the management of thromboembolic disease and cognitive impairment. Medical and neurological complications are being identified more often in brain tumor patients with the improved survival provided by therapeutic advances. Early and proper identification and management of such complications are crucial for a better survival and quality of life.
Collapse
|
6
|
Parsons MW, Dietrich J. Assessment and Management of Cognitive Symptoms in Patients With Brain Tumors. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2021; 41:e90-e99. [PMID: 34061562 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_320813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Cognitive symptoms occur in almost all patients with brain tumors at varying points in the disease course. Deficits in neurocognitive function may be caused by the tumor itself, treatment (surgery, radiation, or chemotherapy), or other complicating factors (e.g., seizures, fatigue, mood disturbance) and can have a profound effect on functional independence and quality of life. Assessment of neurocognitive function is an important part of comprehensive care of patients with brain tumors. In the neuro-oncology clinic, assessment may include cognitive screening tools and inquiry into subjective cognitive function. Neuropsychological assessment is an important adjunct to identify cognitive symptoms and can be used as an opportunity to intervene through transformative feedback and treatment planning. Preventative measures can be taken to reduce cognitive side effects of treatment, such as awake craniotomies with intraoperative mapping during neurosurgery or prophylactic measures during radiation therapy (e.g., hippocampal avoidance, neuroprotectant treatment with memantine). Rehabilitative therapies, including cognitive rehabilitation and computerized cognitive exercise, are options for managing cognitive problems in an individualized manner. Pharmacotherapy, including use of stimulant medications and acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, has shown benefits for patients with brain tumors when tailored to an individual's cognitive profile. Identification and management of co-occurring issues, such as sleep disturbance, fatigue, and depression, can also improve neurocognitive function. There are promising therapies under development that may provide new options for treatment in the future. Integrating careful assessment and treatment of cognition throughout the disease course for patients with brain tumors can improve functional outcomes and quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael W Parsons
- Pappas Center for Neuro-Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jörg Dietrich
- Pappas Center for Neuro-Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Worrell SL, Kirschner ML, Shatz RS, Sengupta S, Erickson MG. Interdisciplinary Approaches to Survivorship with a Focus on the Low-grade and Benign Brain Tumor Populations. Curr Oncol Rep 2021; 23:19. [PMID: 33471214 PMCID: PMC7817573 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-020-01004-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW "Brain tumor is a bump in the road." Sheryl Crow a famous singer was quoted talking about her meningioma, a benign brain tumor that caused her to forget her lyrics. In this review, we focus on low-grade gliomas in adults and benign brain tumors, such as meningiomas, vestibular schwannomas, and pituitary tumors, since these individuals survive a long time and morbidity is a major issue. RECENT FINDINGS As per the NCI dictionary definition, cancer survivorship focuses on the health and well-being of a person with cancer from the time of diagnosis until the end of life. This includes the physical, mental, emotional, social, and financial effects of cancer that begin at diagnosis and continue through treatment and beyond. The survivorship experience also includes issues related to follow-up care (including regular health and wellness checkups), late effects of treatment, cancer recurrence, second cancers, and quality of life. Family members, friends, and caregivers are also considered part of the survivorship experience (NCI Dictionary: https://www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/cancer-terms ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacey L Worrell
- Department of Neurology & Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Cincinnati, 234 Goodman St, Cincinnati, OH, 45219, USA
| | | | - Rhonna S Shatz
- Department of Neurology & Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Cincinnati, 234 Goodman St, Cincinnati, OH, 45219, USA
| | - Soma Sengupta
- Department of Neurology & Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Cincinnati, 234 Goodman St, Cincinnati, OH, 45219, USA.
| | - Melissa G Erickson
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Constanzo J, Midavaine É, Fouquet J, Lepage M, Descoteaux M, Kirby K, Tremblay L, Masson-Côté L, Geha S, Longpré JM, Paquette B, Sarret P. Brain irradiation leads to persistent neuroinflammation and long-term neurocognitive dysfunction in a region-specific manner. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2020; 102:109954. [PMID: 32360786 DOI: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2020.109954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2020] [Revised: 04/14/2020] [Accepted: 04/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Long-term cognitive deficits are observed after treatment of brain tumors or metastases by radiotherapy. Treatment optimization thus requires a better understanding of the effects of radiotherapy on specific brain regions, according to their sensitivity and interconnectivity. In the present study, behavioral tests supported by immunohistology and magnetic resonance imaging provided a consistent picture of the persistent neurocognitive decline and neuroinflammation after the onset of irradiation-induced necrosis in the right primary somatosensory cortex of Fischer rats. Necrosis surrounded by neovascularization was first detected 54 days after irradiation and then spread to 110 days in the primary motor cortex, primary somatosensory region, striatum and right ventricle, resulting in fiber bundle disruption and demyelination in the corpus callosum of the right hemisphere. These structural damages translated into selective behavioral changes including spatial memory loss, disinhibition of anxiety-like behaviors, hyperactivity and pain hypersensitivity, but no significant alteration in motor coordination and grip strength abilities. Concomitantly, activated microglia and reactive astrocytes, accompanied by infiltration of leukocytes (CD45+) and T-cells (CD3+) cooperated to shape the neuroinflammation response. Overall, our study suggests that the slow and gradual onset of cellular damage would allow adaptation in brain regions that are susceptible to neuronal plasticity; while other cerebral structures that do not have this capacity would be more affected. The planning of radiotherapy, adjusted to the sensitivity and adaptability of brain structures, could therefore preserve certain neurocognitive functions; while higher doses of radiation could be delivered to brain areas that can better adapt to this treatment. In addition, strategies to block early post-radiation events need to be explored to prevent the development of long-term cognitive dysfunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Constanzo
- Center for Research in Radiotherapy, Department of Nuclear Medicine and Radiobiology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec J1H 5N4, Canada
| | - Élora Midavaine
- Department of Pharmacology-Physiology, Institut de Pharmacologie de Sherbrooke, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec J1H 5N4, Canada
| | - Jérémie Fouquet
- Sherbrooke Molecular Imaging Center, Department of Nuclear Medicine and Radiobiology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec J1H 5N4, Canada
| | - Martin Lepage
- Sherbrooke Molecular Imaging Center, Department of Nuclear Medicine and Radiobiology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec J1H 5N4, Canada
| | - Maxime Descoteaux
- Computer Science Department, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec J1K 2R1, Canada
| | - Karyn Kirby
- Department of Pharmacology-Physiology, Institut de Pharmacologie de Sherbrooke, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec J1H 5N4, Canada
| | - Luc Tremblay
- Sherbrooke Molecular Imaging Center, Department of Nuclear Medicine and Radiobiology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec J1H 5N4, Canada
| | - Laurence Masson-Côté
- Center for Research in Radiotherapy, Department of Nuclear Medicine and Radiobiology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec J1H 5N4, Canada; Service of Radiation Oncology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec J1H 5N4, Canada
| | - Sameh Geha
- Department of Pathology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec J1H 5N4, Canada
| | - Jean-Michel Longpré
- Department of Pharmacology-Physiology, Institut de Pharmacologie de Sherbrooke, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec J1H 5N4, Canada
| | - Benoit Paquette
- Center for Research in Radiotherapy, Department of Nuclear Medicine and Radiobiology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec J1H 5N4, Canada.
| | - Philippe Sarret
- Department of Pharmacology-Physiology, Institut de Pharmacologie de Sherbrooke, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec J1H 5N4, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Patients with brain tumors are susceptible to multiple complications that can affect their survival or quality of life. The scope of these complications is widening due to prolonged overall survival and improved therapies. In this review, we discuss the most common complications in this patient population focusing on the recent literature. We specifically concentrated on tumor-related epilepsy, vasogenic edema, infectious, vascular, chemotherapeutic, radiation, endocrine, and cognitive complications. RECENT FINDINGS Molecular biomarkers play a role in epileptogenicity in brain tumor patients, and anti-epileptic drugs may cause neuro-cognitive side effects independent of other factors. The pathophysiology of vasogenic edema remains complex and poorly understood. Limited data suggest that newer oral anticoagulants appear to be safe and effective in venous and arterial thromboembolic complications. Brain tumor patients are prone to a wide variety of complications, including some related to new therapies. Optimal management of these complications improves quality of life, and in some cases overall survival.
Collapse
|
10
|
Şahİn K, DurdaĞi S. Combined ligand and structure-based virtual screening approaches for identification of novel AChE inhibitors. Turk J Chem 2020; 44:574-588. [PMID: 33488178 PMCID: PMC7671205 DOI: 10.3906/kim-1911-57] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2019] [Accepted: 03/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The excessive activity of acetylcholinesterase enzyme (AChE) causes different neuronal problems, especially dementia and neuronal cell deaths. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved drugs donepezil, rivastigmine, tacrine and galantamine are AChE inhibitors and in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) these drugs are currently prescribed. However, these inhibitors have various adverse side effects. Therefore, there is a great need for the novel selective AChE inhibitors with fewer adverse side effects for the effective treatment. In this study, combined ligand-based and structure-based virtual screening approaches were used to identify new hit compounds from small molecules library of National Cancer Institute (NCI) containing approximately 265,000 small molecules. In the present study, we developed a computational pipeline method to predict the binding affinities of the studied compounds at the specific target sites. For this purpose, a text mining study was carried out initially and compounds containing the keyword “indol” were considered. The therapeutic activity values against AD were screened using the binary quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) models. We then performed docking, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and free energy analysis to clarify the interactions between selected ligands and enzyme. Thus, in this study we identified new promising hit compounds from a large database that may be used to inhibit the enzyme activity of AChE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kader Şahİn
- Computational Biology and Molecular Simulations Laboratory, Department of Biophysics, School of Medicine, Bahçeşehir University, Istanbul Turkey
| | - Serdar DurdaĞi
- Computational Biology and Molecular Simulations Laboratory, Department of Biophysics, School of Medicine, Bahçeşehir University, Istanbul Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
Increased life expectancy in brain tumour patients had led to the need for strategies that preserve and improve cognitive functioning, as many patients suffer from cognitive deficits. The tumour itself, as well as antitumor treatment including surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, supportive treatment and individual patient factors are associated with cognitive problems. Here, we review the recent literature on approaches that preserve and improve cognitive functioning, including pharmacological agents and rehabilitation programs.
Collapse
|
12
|
Cherrier MM, Higano CS. Impact of androgen deprivation therapy on mood, cognition, and risk for AD. Urol Oncol 2020; 38:53-61. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.01.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2018] [Revised: 01/11/2019] [Accepted: 01/18/2019] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
|
13
|
Miladi N, Dossa R, Dogba MJ, Cléophat-Jolicoeur MIF, Gagnon B. Psychostimulants for cancer-related cognitive impairment in adult cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Support Care Cancer 2019; 27:3717-3727. [PMID: 31250183 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-019-04907-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2018] [Accepted: 05/31/2019] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cognitive impairment is recognized as a common symptom experienced by cancer survivors which impacts on quality of life (QoL) and day-to-day activities. One of the treatment options is the use of psychostimulants but the evidence supporting its use remains unclear. OBJECTIVES To identify the level of evidence of psychostimulants' effect on the management of cognitive impairment in adult cancer survivors. METHODS Electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL) and reference lists of relevant reviews were searched from inception to December 2017, with no language restrictions applied. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), evaluating the effect of psychostimulants on cognitive impairment among cancer patients with no primary or secondary brain tumor or brain radiation, were included. The primary outcome was cognitive function changes, whereas secondary outcomes were adverse events (AEs) and QoL. RESULTS Six RCTs were included: three studies investigating methylphenidate and three modafinil, with a total of 244 and 146 patients, respectively. Due to important differences in methodologies between studies, a meta-analysis was assumed inappropriate for the primary outcome. A narrative synthesis was performed. One study using methylphenidate and two using modafinil demonstrated improvements in some cognitive functions as measured by objective cognitive assessment tests. Psychostimulants did not improve QoL and were not associated with more AEs. CONCLUSION To date, limited evidence is available to estimate the usefulness (or lack) of psychostimulants on cognitive function in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadia Miladi
- Oncology Division, CHU de Québec-Laval University Research Center, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - Richi Dossa
- Oncology Division, CHU de Québec-Laval University Research Center, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - Maman Joyce Dogba
- Oncology Division, CHU de Québec-Laval University Research Center, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | | | - Bruno Gagnon
- Oncology Division, CHU de Québec-Laval University Research Center, Quebec City, QC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
Impaired neurocognitive function is an increasingly recognized morbidity in patients who have cancer. Cancer treatments, psychosocial stressors, and the malignancy itself can alter brain function. The mechanisms by which this occurs are under active investigation. Although there is a growing appreciation of its prevalence and causes, there remain limited therapeutic options for the treatment of neurocognitive dysfunction in this population. A persistent scientific and clinical effort to understand its mechanisms and impact is critical to the care of oncology patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca A Harrison
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 0431, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| | - Jeffrey S Wefel
- Section of Neuropsychology, Department of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 0431, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Tom MC, Cahill DP, Buckner JC, Dietrich J, Parsons MW, Yu JS. Management for Different Glioma Subtypes: Are All Low-Grade Gliomas Created Equal? Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2019; 39:133-145. [PMID: 31099638 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_238353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Following the identification of key molecular alterations that provided superior prognostication and led to the updated 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) Central Nervous System (CNS) Tumor Classification, the understanding of glioma behavior has rapidly evolved. Mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) 1 and 2 are present in the majority of adult grade 2 and 3 gliomas, and when used in conjunction with 1p/19q codeletion for classification, the prognostic distinction between grade 2 versus grade 3 is diminished. As such, the previously often used term of "low-grade glioma," which referred to grade 2 gliomas, has now been replaced by the phrase "lower-grade glioma" to encompass both grade 2 and 3 tumors. Additional molecular characterization is ongoing to even further classify this heterogeneous group of tumors. With such a colossal shift in the understanding of lower-grade gliomas, management of disease is being redefined in the setting of emerging molecular-genetic biomarkers. In this article, we review recent progress and future directions regarding the surgical, radiotherapeutic, chemotherapeutic, and long-term management of adult lower-grade gliomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin C Tom
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Daniel P Cahill
- 2 Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jan C Buckner
- 3 Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Jörg Dietrich
- 4 Department of Neurology, Division of Neuro-Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Michael W Parsons
- 4 Department of Neurology, Division of Neuro-Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jennifer S Yu
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.,5 Department of Cancer Biology, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
van Lonkhuizen PJC, Klaver KM, Wefel JS, Sitskoorn MM, Schagen SB, Gehring K. Interventions for cognitive problems in adults with brain cancer: A narrative review. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2019; 28:e13088. [PMID: 31090162 PMCID: PMC9285967 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2019] [Revised: 04/17/2019] [Accepted: 04/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Many patients with brain cancer experience cognitive problems. In this narrative review, we comprehensively evaluated empirical studies on various intervention approaches for cognitive problems in these patients. METHODS Intervention studies that reported effects on cognitive functioning (either objectively tested or subjectively reported) in adult patients with primary and/or secondary brain tumours were identified through online searches in PubMed (MEDLINE) and Web of Science up to 13 March 2019. RESULTS Of the 364 identified records, 10 pharmacological (including five randomised placebo-controlled trials), 10 cognitive rehabilitation (including five [pilot] RCTs) and two multiple-group exercise studies matched the inclusion criteria. Seventeen of 22 studies had final sample sizes smaller than 40. Several cognitive rehabilitation studies and some pharmacological approaches (donepezil and memantine) showed (at least partial) benefits for cognitive problems in adults with brain cancer. The effects of other pharmacological and exercise interventions were inconclusive and/or preliminary. CONCLUSION Overall, drawing firm conclusions is complicated due to various methodological shortcomings, including the absence of a (placebo) control group and small sample sizes. Promising effects have been reported for cognitive rehabilitation and some pharmacological approaches. Suggestions for more thorough research with respect to the various approaches are provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pearl J C van Lonkhuizen
- Department of Cognitive Neuropsychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.,Department of Neurosurgery, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Kete M Klaver
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jeffrey S Wefel
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.,Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Margriet M Sitskoorn
- Department of Cognitive Neuropsychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Sanne B Schagen
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Brain and Cognition, Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Karin Gehring
- Department of Cognitive Neuropsychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.,Department of Neurosurgery, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Pharmacologic management of cognitive impairment induced by cancer therapy. Lancet Oncol 2019; 20:e92-e102. [DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30938-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2018] [Revised: 12/04/2018] [Accepted: 12/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
18
|
Abstract
Survival alone is no longer an adequate outcome for persons with brain tumors; the quality of the survivorship experience should be viewed with equal importance. Symptom management is a significant component of quality survivorship care. Regardless of their histology, brain tumors and therapies used to treat them produce symptoms that affect an individual's ability to function in everyday life. Common symptoms include fatigue, cognitive impairment, distress, and sleep disturbance. Symptom-based interventions for persons with brain tumors focus on prevention, self-management, and prescriptive interventions targeted to these problems. Unfortunately, little evidence exists to support many interventions, making it challenging for clinicians to provide concrete recommendations. Research is needed to provide evidence in support of symptom-based interventions while novel approaches to these challenging problems are developed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Amidei
- Northwestern Medicine, Neurological Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Sun LR, Cooper S. Neurological Complications of the Treatment of Pediatric Neoplastic Disorders. Pediatr Neurol 2018; 85:33-42. [PMID: 30126755 DOI: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2018.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2018] [Accepted: 05/25/2018] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Neurological complications resulting from childhood cancer treatments are common. Treatment for childhood neoplastic disorders is often multimodal and may include procedures, cranial irradiation, chemotherapy, transplant, and immunotherapy, each of which carries distinct neurological risks. Procedures, such as lumbar punctures, are commonly used in this population for diagnostic purposes as well as intrathecal medication administration. Surgery is associated with an array of potential neurological complications, with posterior fossa syndrome being a common cause of morbidity in pediatric brain tumor patients after neurosurgical resection. Cranial irradiation can cause late neurological sequelae such as stroke, cerebral vasculopathy, secondary malignancy, and cognitive dysfunction. Neurotoxic effects of chemotherapeutic agents are common and include neuropathy, coagulopathy causing stroke or cerebral sinovenous thrombosis, encephalopathy, seizures, cerebellar dysfunction, myelopathy, and neuropsychologic difficulties. Hematopoietic stem cell transplant has a high risk of neurological complications including central nervous system infection, seizures, and stroke. Immunotherapies, including chimeric antigen receptor-modified T-cells (CAR T-cells) and immune checkpoint inhibitors, are emerging as potentially effective strategies to treat some types of childhood cancer, but may carry with them substantial neurotoxicity which is just beginning to be recognized and studied. With evolving treatment protocols, childhood cancer survivorship is increasing, and the role of the neurologist in managing both the acute and chronic neurological consequences of treatment is becoming more important. Prevention, early recognition, and treatment of therapy-associated neurotoxicity are imperative to ensuring children can remain on the most effective therapeutic regimens and to improve the neurological function and quality of life of childhood cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa R Sun
- The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Department of Neurology, Division of Pediatric Neurology, Baltimore, Maryland; The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Department of Neurology, Division of Cerebrovascular Neurology, Baltimore, Maryland.
| | - Stacy Cooper
- The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Department of Oncology, Division of Pediatric Oncology, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Naughton MJ, Case LD, Peiffer A, Chan M, Stieber V, Moore D, Falchuk S, Piephoff J, Edenfield W, Giguere J, Loghin M, Shaw EG, Rapp SR. Quality of life of irradiated brain tumor survivors treated with donepezil or placebo: Results of the WFU CCOP research base protocol 91105. Neurooncol Pract 2018; 5:114-121. [PMID: 29770225 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npx016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The health-related quality of life (HRQL) and fatigue of brain cancer survivors treated with donepezil or placebo for cognitive symptoms after radiation therapy were examined. Methods One hundred ninety-eight patients who completed >30 Gy fractionated whole or partial brain irradiation at least 6 months prior to enrollment were randomized to either placebo or donepezil (5 mg for 6 weeks followed by 10 mg for 18 weeks) in a phase 3 trial. A neurocognitive battery, the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain (FACT-Br) and the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-fatigue, was administered at baseline, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks. Results At 12 weeks, donepezil resulted in improvements in only emotional functioning (P = .04), with no significant effects at week 24. Associations by level of baseline cognitive symptoms (above or below the median score of the baseline FACT-Br "additional concerns/brain" subscale), indicated that participants with more baseline symptoms who received donepezil versus placebo, showed improvements in social (P = .02) and emotional well-being (P = .038), other concerns/brain (P = .003) and the FACT-Br total score (P = .004) at 12 weeks, but not 24 weeks. However, participants with fewer baseline symptoms randomized to donepezil versus placebo reported lower functional well-being at both 12 (P = .015) and 24 weeks (P = .009), and greater fatigue (P = .02) at 24 weeks. Conclusions The positive impact of donepezil on HRQL was greater in survivors reporting more baseline cognitive symptoms. Donepezil had significantly worse effects on fatigue and functional well-being among participants with fewer baseline symptoms. Future interventions with donepezil should target participants with more baseline cognitive complaints to achieve greater therapeutic impact and lessen potential side effects of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle J Naughton
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - L Douglas Case
- Department of Biostatistical Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Ann Peiffer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Michael Chan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Monica Loghin
- University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Edward G Shaw
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Stephen R Rapp
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Pendergrass JC, Targum SD, Harrison JE. Cognitive Impairment Associated with Cancer: A Brief Review. INNOVATIONS IN CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE 2018; 15:36-44. [PMID: 29497579 PMCID: PMC5819720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
This brief review explores the areas of cognitive impairment that have been observed in cancer patients and survivors, the cognitive assessment tools used, and the management of the observed cognitive changes. Cognitive changes and impairment observed in patients with cancer and those in remission can be related to the direct effects of cancer itself, nonspecific factors or comorbid conditions that are independent of the actual disease, and/or the treatments or combination of treatments administered. Attention, memory, and executive functioning are the most frequently identified cognitive domains impacted by cancer. However, the prevalence and extent of impairment remains largely unknown due to marked differences in methodology, definitions of cognitive impairment, and the assessment measures used. Assessment of cognitive functioning is an important and necessary part of a comprehensive oncological care plan. Research is needed to establish a better understanding of cognitive changes and impairments associated with cancer so that optimal patient outcomes can be achieved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Cara Pendergrass
- Drs. Pendergrass and Targum are with Bracket Global and Clintara LLC, A Bracket Company, in Boston, Massachusetts
- Dr. Harrison is with the Alzheimer's Center and Department of Neurology, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center in Amsterdam, Netherlands; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, United Kingdom; and Metis Cognition Ltd, Park House, Kilmington Common in Wiltshire, United Kingdom
| | - Steven D Targum
- Drs. Pendergrass and Targum are with Bracket Global and Clintara LLC, A Bracket Company, in Boston, Massachusetts
- Dr. Harrison is with the Alzheimer's Center and Department of Neurology, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center in Amsterdam, Netherlands; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, United Kingdom; and Metis Cognition Ltd, Park House, Kilmington Common in Wiltshire, United Kingdom
| | - John E Harrison
- Drs. Pendergrass and Targum are with Bracket Global and Clintara LLC, A Bracket Company, in Boston, Massachusetts
- Dr. Harrison is with the Alzheimer's Center and Department of Neurology, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center in Amsterdam, Netherlands; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, United Kingdom; and Metis Cognition Ltd, Park House, Kilmington Common in Wiltshire, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Correa DD, Kryza-Lacombe M, Zhou X, Baser RE, Beattie BJ, Beiene Z, Humm J, DeAngelis LM, Orlow I, Weber W, Osborne J. A pilot study of neuropsychological functions, APOE and amyloid imaging in patients with gliomas. J Neurooncol 2017; 136:613-622. [PMID: 29168082 PMCID: PMC5807139 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-017-2692-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2017] [Accepted: 11/18/2017] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Brain tumor patients treated with radiotherapy (RT) often develop cognitive dysfunction, and recent studies suggest that the APOE ε-4 allele may influence cognitive outcome. The ε-4 allele is known to promote beta (β) amyloid deposition in the cortex, and preliminary evidence suggests that RT may be associated with this process. However, it is unknown whether β-amyloid accumulation contributes to treatment neurotoxicity. In this pilot study, we assessed neuropsychological functions and β-amyloid retention using 18F-florbetaben (FBB) PET in a subset of brain tumor patients who participated in our study of APOE polymorphisms and cognitive functions. Twenty glioma patients treated with conformal RT ± chemotherapy participated in the study: 6 were APOE ε-4 carriers and 14 were non-ε-4 carriers. Patients completed a neuropsychological re-evaluation (mean time interval = 5 years, SD = 0.83) and brain MRI and FBB PET scans. Wilcoxon signed-rank test comparisons between prior and current neuropsychological assessments showed a significant decline in attention (Brief Test of Attention, p = 0.018), and a near significant decline in verbal learning (Hopkins Verbal learning Test-Learning, p = 0.07). Comparisons by APOE status showed significant differences over time in attention/working memory (WAIS-III digits forward, p = 0.028 and digits backward, p = 0.032), with a decline among APOE ε-4 carriers. There were no significant differences in any of the FBB PET analyses between APOE ε-4 carriers and non-ε-4 carriers. The findings suggest that glioma patients may experience worsening in attention and executive functions several years after treatment, and that the APOE ε-4 allele may modulate cognitive decline, but independent of increased β-amyloid deposition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D D Correa
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10021, USA. .,Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
| | - M Kryza-Lacombe
- San Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, San Diego State University/University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - X Zhou
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - R E Baser
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - B J Beattie
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Z Beiene
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - J Humm
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - L M DeAngelis
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10021, USA.,Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - I Orlow
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - W Weber
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - J Osborne
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Brewster KK, Shalev D, Levenson JA. Chemotherapy-Related Cognitive Impairment #342. J Palliat Med 2017; 20:1407-1408. [PMID: 29091520 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
24
|
Buthut M, Haussmann R, Seidlitz A, Krause M, Donix M. [Cognitive deficits following brain tumor radiation therapy]. DER NERVENARZT 2017; 89:423-430. [PMID: 28932944 DOI: 10.1007/s00115-017-0423-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Brain radiation is an important treatment option for malignant and benign brain diseases. The possible acute or chronic impact of radiation therapy on cognitive performance is important for daily functioning and quality of life. A detailed evaluation of cognitive impairment is important in the context of how to control disease progression. The susceptibility of the hippocampus to radiation-induced neuronal damage and its important role in memory highlight that therapeutic strategies require precision medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Buthut
- Neurologische Klinik (Neustadt/Trachau), Städtisches Klinikum Dresden, Industriestr. 40, 01129, Dresden, Deutschland
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der Technischen Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland
| | - R Haussmann
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der Technischen Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland
| | - A Seidlitz
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, OncoRay - Nationales Zentrum für Strahlenforschung in der Onkologie, Medizinische Fakultät und Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der Technischen Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland
| | - M Krause
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, OncoRay - Nationales Zentrum für Strahlenforschung in der Onkologie, Medizinische Fakultät und Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der Technischen Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Dresden, Deutschland
- Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen (NCT), Dresden, Deutschland
- Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Deutschland
- Institut für Radioonkologie - OncoRay, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Deutschland
| | - M Donix
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der Technischen Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland.
- Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Standort Dresden, Arnoldstr. 18, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
Sigma1 (also known as sigma-1 receptor, Sig1R, σ1 receptor) is a unique pharmacologically regulated integral membrane chaperone or scaffolding protein. The majority of publications on the subject have focused on the neuropharmacology of Sigma1. However, a number of publications have also suggested a role for Sigma1 in cancer. Although there is currently no clinically used anti-cancer drug that targets Sigma1, a growing body of evidence supports the potential of Sigma1 ligands as therapeutic agents to treat cancer. In preclinical models, compounds with affinity for Sigma1 have been reported to inhibit cancer cell proliferation and survival, cell adhesion and migration, tumor growth, to alleviate cancer-associated pain, and to have immunomodulatory properties. This review will highlight that although the literature supports a role for Sigma1 in cancer, several fundamental questions regarding drug mechanism of action and the physiological relevance of aberrant SIGMAR1 transcript and Sigma1 protein expression in certain cancers remain unanswered or only partially answered. However, emerging lines of evidence suggest that Sigma1 is a component of the cancer cell support machinery, that it facilitates protein interaction networks, that it allosterically modulates the activity of its associated proteins, and that Sigma1 is a selectively multifunctional drug target.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix J Kim
- Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, Drexel University College of Medicine, 245 North 15th Street, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Christina M Maher
- Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, Drexel University College of Medicine, 245 North 15th Street, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Randazzo D, Peters KB. Psychosocial distress and its effects on the health-related quality of life of primary brain tumor patients. CNS Oncol 2016; 5:241-9. [PMID: 27397796 PMCID: PMC6040083 DOI: 10.2217/cns-2016-0010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2016] [Accepted: 05/05/2016] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
All cancer patients experience distress from the diagnosis, the effects of the disease or the treatment. Clinically significant distress decreases overall quality of life and the recognition of distress with prompt intervention is essential. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network distress thermometer (NCCN-DT) is a validated measuring tool that has been utilized in the primary brain tumor population to detect psychologic distress thereby provoking a referral process to the appropriate support system. Brain tumor patients commonly reported emotional and physical distress encompassing: fatigue, fears, memory and concentration and worry. More research is needed to identify the stressors of all primary brain tumor patients and their caretakers and integrate appropriate interventions to improve health-related quality of life in both groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dina Randazzo
- Department of Neurology, Duke University Medical Center, The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Katherine B Peters
- Department of Neurology, Duke University Medical Center, The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| |
Collapse
|