Machine learning: a useful radiological adjunct in determination of a newly diagnosed glioma's grade and IDH status

Rapid diagnosis of TERT promoter mutation using Terahertz absorption spectroscopy in glioblastoma

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly aggressive brain tumor with poor outcomes and limited treatment options. The telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter mutation, one of the key biomarkers in GBM, is linked to tumor progression and prognosis. This study employed terahertz time-domain spectroscopy (THz-TDS) to analyze frozen GBM tissue sections, extracting six spectral features: absorption coefficient, dielectric loss factor, dielectric constant, extinction coefficient, refractive index, and dielectric loss tangent. LASSO regression was employed for feature selection, and then principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to minimize inter-feature correlations. A Random Forest classifier built on these features successfully predicted TERT mutation status, achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.908 in the validation set. Our findings demonstrate that THz spectroscopy, coupled with machine learning, can identify molecular differences associated with TERT mutations, supporting its potential as a rapid, intraoperative diagnostic tool for personalized GBM treatment. This approach could enhance surgical decision-making and optimize patient outcomes through precise, real-time molecular diagnostics.

Glioma Tumor Grading Using Radiomics on Conventional MRI: A Comparative Study of WHO 2021 and WHO 2016 Classification of Central Nervous Tumors

BACKGROUND

Glioma grading transformed in World Health Organization (WHO) 2021 CNS tumor classification, integrating molecular markers. However, the impact of this change on radiomics-based machine learning (ML) classifiers remains unexplored.

PURPOSE

To assess the performance of ML in classifying glioma tumor grades based on various WHO criteria.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective.

SUBJECTS

A neuropathologist regraded gliomas of 237 patients into WHO 2016 and 2021 from 2007 criteria.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

Multicentric 0.5 to 3 Tesla; pre- and post-contrast T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery.

ASSESSMENT

Radiomic features were selected using random forest-recursive feature elimination. The synthetic minority over-sampling technique (SMOTE) was implemented for data augmentation. Stratified 10-fold cross-validation with and without SMOTE was used to evaluate 11 classifiers for 3-grade (2, 3, and 4; WHO 2016 and 2021) and 2-grade (low and high grade; WHO 2007 and 2021) classification. Additionally, we developed the models on data randomly divided into training and test sets (mixed-data analysis), or data divided based on the centers (independent-data analysis).

STATISTICAL TESTS

We assessed ML classifiers using sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Top performances were compared with a t-test and categorical data with the chi-square test using a significance level of P < 0.05.

RESULTS

In the mixed-data analysis, Stacking Classifier without SMOTE achieved the highest accuracy (0.86) and AUC (0.92) in 3-grade WHO 2021 grouping. The results of WHO 2021 were significantly better than WHO 2016 (P-value<0.0001). In the 2-grade analysis, ML achieved 1.00 in all metrics. In the independent-data analysis, ML classifiers showed strong discrimination between grade 2 and 4, despite lower performance metrics than the mixed analysis.

DATA CONCLUSION

ML algorithms performed better in glioma tumor grading based on WHO 2021 criteria. Nonetheless, the clinical use of ML classifiers needs further investigation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

A subregion-based RadioFusionOmics model discriminates between grade 4 astrocytoma and glioblastoma on multisequence MRI

PURPOSE

To explore a subregion-based RadioFusionOmics (RFO) model for discrimination between adult-type grade 4 astrocytoma and glioblastoma according to the 2021 WHO CNS5 classification.

METHODS

329 patients (40 grade 4 astrocytomas and 289 glioblastomas) with histologic diagnosis was retrospectively collected from our local institution and The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA). The volumes of interests (VOIs) were obtained from four multiparametric MRI sequences (T1WI, T1WI + C, T2WI, T2-FLAIR) using (1) manual segmentation of the non-enhanced tumor (nET), enhanced tumor (ET), and peritumoral edema (pTE), and (2) K-means clustering of four habitats (H1: high T1WI + C, high T2-FLAIR; (2) H2: high T1WI + C, low T2-FLAIR; (3) H3: low T1WI + C, high T2-FLAIR; and (4) H4: low T1WI + C, low T2-FLAIR). The optimal VOI and best MRI sequence combination were determined. The performance of the RFO model was evaluated using the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) and the best signatures were identified.

RESULTS

The two best VOIs were manual VOI3 (putative peritumoral edema) and clustering H34 (low T1WI + C, high T2-FLAIR (H3) combined with low T1WI + C and low T2-FLAIR (H4)). Features fused from four MRI sequences ([Formula: see text]) outperformed those from either a single sequence or other sequence combinations. The RFO model that was trained using fused features [Formula: see text] achieved the AUPRC of 0.972 (VOI3) and 0.976 (H34) in the primary cohort (p = 0.905), and 0.971 (VOI3) and 0.974 (H34) in the testing cohort (p = 0.402).

CONCLUSION

The performance of subregions defined by clustering was comparable to that of subregions that were manually defined. Fusion of features from the edematous subregions of multiple MRI sequences by the RFO model resulted in differentiation between grade 4 astrocytoma and glioblastoma.

Noninvasive prediction of IDH mutation status in gliomas using preoperative multiparametric MRI radiomics nomogram: A mutlicenter study

PURPOSE

To establish and validate a radiomics nomogram for preoperative prediction of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation status of gliomas in a multicenter setting.

METHODS

414 gliomas patients were collected (306 from local institution and 108 from TCGA). 851 radiomics features were extracted from contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (CE-T1W) and fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequence, respectively. The features were refined using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression combing 10-fold cross-validation. The optimal radiomics features with age and sex were processed by multivariate logistic regression analysis to construct a prediction model, which was developed in the training dataset and assessed in the test and validation dataset. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve and decision curve analysis were applied in the test and external validation datasets to evaluate the performance of the prediction model.

RESULTS

Ten robust radiomics features were selected from the 1702 features (four CE-T1W features and six FLAIR features). A nomogram was plotted to represent the prediction model. The accuracy and AUC of the radiomics nomogram achieved 86.96% and 0.891(0.809-0.947) in the test dataset and 84.26% and 0.881(0.805-0.936) in the external validation dataset (all p < 0.05). The positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were 83.72% and 87.75% in the test dataset and 87.81% and 82.09% in the external validation dataset.

CONCLUSION

IDH genotypes of gliomas can be identified by preoperative multiparametric MRI radiomics nomogram and might be clinically meaningful for treatment strategy and prognosis stratification of gliomas.

Use of Radiomics Models in Preoperative Grading of Cerebral Gliomas and Comparison with Three-dimensional Arterial Spin Labelling

AIMS

To build machine learning-based radiomics models to discriminate between high- (HGGs) and low-grade gliomas (LGGs) and to compare the effectiveness of three-dimensional arterial spin labelling (3D-ASL) to evaluate which is a better method.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analysed the magnetic resonance imaging T1WI-enhanced images of 105 patients with gliomas that were pathologically confirmed in our hospital. We divided the patients into a training group and a verification group at a ratio of 8:2; 200 patients from the Brain Tumour Segmentation Challenge 2020 were selected as the test group for image segmentation, feature extraction and screening. We constructed models using multilayer perceptron (MLP), support vector machine, random forest and logistic regression and evaluated their predictive performance. We obtained the mean maximum relative cerebral blood flow (rCBFmax) value from 3D-ASL of 105 patients from the hospital to evaluate its efficacy in discriminating between HGGs and LGGs.

RESULTS

In machine learning, the MLP classifier model exhibited the best performance in discriminating between HGGs and LGGs; the areas under the curve obtained by MLP and rCBFmax were 0.968 versus 0.815 (verification group) and 0.981 versus 0.815 (test group), respectively. The machine learning-based MLP classifier model performed better in discriminating between HGGs and LGGs than 3D-ASL.

CONCLUSION

In our study, we found that machine learning-based radiomics models and 3D-ASL were valuable in discriminating between HGGs and LGGs and between them, the machine learning-based MLP model had better diagnostic performance.

Assessment of artificial intelligence (AI) reporting methodology in glioma MRI studies using the Checklist for AI in Medical Imaging (CLAIM)

PURPOSE

The Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM) is a recently released guideline designed for the optimal reporting methodology of artificial intelligence (AI) studies. Gliomas are the most common form of primary malignant brain tumour and numerous outcomes derived from AI algorithms such as grading, survival, treatment-related effects and molecular status have been reported. The aim of the study is to evaluate the AI reporting methodology for outcomes relating to gliomas in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using the CLAIM criteria.

METHODS

A literature search was performed on three databases pertaining to AI augmentation of glioma MRI, published between the start of 2018 and the end of 2021 RESULTS: A total of 4308 articles were identified and 138 articles remained after screening. These articles were categorised into four main AI tasks: grading (n= 44), predicting molecular status (n= 50), predicting survival (n= 25) and distinguishing true tumour progression from treatment-related effects (n= 10). The average CLAIM score was 20/42 (range: 10-31). Studies most consistently reported the scientific background and clinical role of their AI approach. Areas of improvement were identified in the reporting of data collection, data management, ground truth and validation of AI performance.

CONCLUSION

AI may be a means of producing high-accuracy results for certain tasks in glioma MRI; however, there remain issues with reporting quality. AI reporting guidelines may aid in a more reproducible and standardised approach to reporting and will aid in clinical integration.

Challenges and opportunities for advanced neuroimaging of glioblastoma

Glioblastoma is the most aggressive of glial tumours in adults. On conventional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, these tumours are observed as irregular enhancing lesions with areas of infiltrating tumour and cortical expansion. More advanced imaging techniques including diffusion-weighted MRI, perfusion-weighted MRI, MR spectroscopy and positron emission tomography (PET) imaging have found widespread application to diagnostic challenges in the setting of first diagnosis, treatment planning and follow-up. This review aims to educate readers with regard to the strengths and weaknesses of the clinical application of these imaging techniques. For example, this review shows that the (semi)quantitative analysis of the mentioned advanced imaging tools was found useful for assessing tumour aggressiveness and tumour extent, and aids in the differentiation of tumour progression from treatment-related effects. Although these techniques may aid in the diagnostic work-up and (post-)treatment phase of glioblastoma, so far no unequivocal imaging strategy is available. Furthermore, the use and further development of artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools could greatly enhance neuroradiological practice by automating labour-intensive tasks such as tumour measurements, and by providing additional diagnostic information such as prediction of tumour genotype. Nevertheless, due to the fact that advanced imaging and AI-diagnostics is not part of response assessment criteria, there is no harmonised guidance on their use, while at the same time the lack of standardisation severely hampers the definition of uniform guidelines.

Multimodal MRI-Based Radiomic Nomogram for the Early Differentiation of Recurrence and Pseudoprogression of High-Grade Glioma

Objective

To evaluate the diagnostic value of multimodal MRI radiomics based on T2-weighted fluid attenuated inversion recovery imaging (T2WI-FLAIR) combined with T1-weighted contrast enhanced imaging (T1WI-CE) in the early differentiation of high-grade glioma recurrence from pseudoprogression.

Methods

A total of one hundred eighteen patients with brain gliomas who were diagnosed from March 2014 to April 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the clinical characteristics, the patients were randomly split into a training group (n = 83) and a test group (n = 35) at a 7 : 3 ratio. The region of interest (ROI) was delineated, and 2632 radiomic features were extracted. We used multiple logistic regression to establish a classification model, including the T1 model, T2 model, and T1 + T2 model, to differentiate recurrence from pseudoprogression. The diagnostic efficiency of the model was evaluated by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and accuracy (ACC) and by analyzing the calibration curve of the nomogram and decision curve.

Results

There were 75 cases of recurrence and 43 cases of pseudoprogression. The diagnostic efficacies of the multimodal MRI-based radiomic model were relatively high. The AUC values and ACC of the training group were 0.831 and 77.11%, respectively, and the AUC values and ACC of the test group were 0.829 and 88.57%, respectively. The calibration curve of the nomogram showed that the discrimination probability was consistent with the actual occurrence in the training group, and the discrimination probability was roughly the same as the actual occurrence in the test group. In the decision curve analysis, the T1 + T2 model showed greater overall net efficiency.

Conclusion

The multimodal MRI radiomic model has relatively high efficiency in the early differentiation of recurrence from pseudoprogression, and it could be helpful for clinicians in devising correct treatment plans so that patients can be treated in a timely and accurate manner.

Machine Learning Models for Classifying High- and Low-Grade Gliomas: A Systematic Review and Quality of Reporting Analysis

Objectives

To systematically review, assess the reporting quality of, and discuss improvement opportunities for studies describing machine learning (ML) models for glioma grade prediction.

Methods

This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA) statement. A systematic search was performed in September 2020, and repeated in January 2021, on four databases: Embase, Medline, CENTRAL, and Web of Science Core Collection. Publications were screened in Covidence, and reporting quality was measured against the Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) Statement. Descriptive statistics were calculated using GraphPad Prism 9.

Results

The search identified 11,727 candidate articles with 1,135 articles undergoing full text review and 85 included in analysis. 67 (79%) articles were published between 2018-2021. The mean prediction accuracy of the best performing model in each study was 0.89 ± 0.09. The most common algorithm for conventional machine learning studies was Support Vector Machine (mean accuracy: 0.90 ± 0.07) and for deep learning studies was Convolutional Neural Network (mean accuracy: 0.91 ± 0.10). Only one study used both a large training dataset (n>200) and external validation (accuracy: 0.72) for their model. The mean adherence rate to TRIPOD was 44.5% ± 11.1%, with poor reporting adherence for model performance (0%), abstracts (0%), and titles (0%).

Conclusions

The application of ML to glioma grade prediction has grown substantially, with ML model studies reporting high predictive accuracies but lacking essential metrics and characteristics for assessing model performance. Several domains, including generalizability and reproducibility, warrant further attention to enable translation into clinical practice.

Systematic Review Registration

PROSPERO, identifier CRD42020209938.

Visualization of tumor heterogeneity and prediction of isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation status for human gliomas using multiparametric physiologic and metabolic MRI

This study aimed to differentiate isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation status with the voxel-wise clustering method of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to discover biological underpinnings of the clusters. A total of 69 patients with treatment-naïve diffuse glioma were scanned with pH-sensitive amine chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI, diffusion-weighted imaging, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery, and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging at 3 T. An unsupervised two-level clustering approach was used for feature extraction from acquired images. The logarithmic ratio of the labels in each class within tumor regions was applied to a support vector machine to differentiate IDH status. The highest performance to predict IDH mutation status was found for 10-class clustering, with a mean area under the curve, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.94, 0.91, 0.90, and 0.91, respectively. Targeted biopsies revealed that the tissues with labels 7-10 showed high expression levels of hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha, glucose transporter 3, and hexokinase 2, which are typical of IDH wild-type glioma, whereas those with labels 1 showed low expression of these proteins. In conclusion, A machine learning model successfully predicted the IDH mutation status of gliomas, and the resulting clusters properly reflected the metabolic status of the tumors.

AI and High-Grade Glioma for Diagnosis and Outcome Prediction: Do All Machine Learning Models Perform Equally Well?

Radiomic models outperform clinical data for outcome prediction in high-grade gliomas (HGG). However, lack of parameter standardization limits clinical applications. Many machine learning (ML) radiomic models employ single classifiers rather than ensemble learning, which is known to boost performance, and comparative analyses are lacking in the literature. We aimed to compare ML classifiers to predict clinically relevant tasks for HGG: overall survival (OS), isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation, O-6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation, epidermal growth factor receptor vIII (EGFR) amplification, and Ki-67 expression, based on radiomic features from conventional and advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Our objective was to identify the best algorithm for each task. One hundred fifty-six adult patients with pathologic diagnosis of HGG were included. Three tumoral regions were manually segmented: contrast-enhancing tumor, necrosis, and non-enhancing tumor. Radiomic features were extracted with a custom version of Pyradiomics and selected through Boruta algorithm. A Grid Search algorithm was applied when computing ten times K-fold cross-validation (K=10) to get the highest mean and lowest spread of accuracy. Model performance was assessed as AUC-ROC curve mean values with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Extreme Gradient Boosting (xGB) obtained highest accuracy for OS (74,5%), Adaboost (AB) for IDH mutation (87.5%), MGMT methylation (70,8%), Ki-67 expression (86%), and EGFR amplification (81%). Ensemble classifiers showed the best performance across tasks. High-scoring radiomic features shed light on possible correlations between MRI and tumor histology.

A Review of Radiomics and Deep Predictive Modeling in Glioma Characterization

Recent developments in glioma categorization based on biological genotypes and application of computational machine learning or deep learning based predictive models using multi-modal MRI biomarkers to assess these genotypes provides potential assurance for optimal and personalized treatment plans and efficacy. Artificial intelligence based quantified assessment of glioma using MRI derived hand-crafted or auto-extracted features have become crucial as genomic alterations can be associated with MRI based phenotypes. This survey integrates all the recent work carried out in state-of-the-art radiomics, and Artificial Intelligence based learning solutions related to molecular diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment monitoring with the aim to create a structured resource on radiogenomic analysis of glioma. Challenges such as inter-scanner variability, requirement of benchmark datasets, prospective validations for clinical applicability are discussed with further scope for designing optimal solutions for glioma stratification with immediate recommendations for further diagnostic decisions and personalized treatment plans for glioma patients.

Reverse Engineering Glioma Radiomics to Conventional Neuroimaging

A novel radiological research field pursuing comprehensive quantitative image, namely “Radiomics,” gained traction along with the advancement of computational technology and artificial intelligence. This novel concept for analyzing medical images brought extensive interest to the neuro-oncology and neuroradiology research community to build a diagnostic workflow to detect clinically relevant genetic alteration of gliomas noninvasively. Although quite a few promising results were published regarding MRI-based diagnosis of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation in gliomas, it has become clear that an ample amount of effort is still needed to render this technology clinically applicable. At the same time, many significant insights were discovered through this research project, some of which could be “reverse engineered” to improve conventional non-radiomic MR image acquisition. In this review article, the authors aim to discuss the recent advancements and encountering issues of radiomics, how we can apply the knowledge provided by radiomics to standard clinical images, and further expected technological advances in the realm of radiomics and glioma.

Differentiation of Low-Grade Astrocytoma From Anaplastic Astrocytoma Using Radiomics-Based Machine Learning Techniques

Purpose

To investigate the diagnostic ability of radiomics-based machine learning in differentiating atypical low-grade astrocytoma (LGA) from anaplastic astrocytoma (AA).

Methods

The current study involved 175 patients diagnosed with LGA (n = 95) or AA (n = 80) and treated in the Neurosurgery Department of West China Hospital from April 2010 to December 2019. Radiomics features were extracted from pre-treatment contrast-enhanced T1 weighted imaging (T1C). Nine diagnostic models were established with three selection methods [Distance Correlation, least absolute shrinkage, and selection operator (LASSO), and Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT)] and three classification algorithms [Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and random forest (RF)]. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and areas under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of each model were calculated. Diagnostic ability of each model was evaluated based on these indexes.

Results

Nine radiomics-based machine learning models with promising diagnostic performances were established. For LDA-based models, the optimal one was the combination of LASSO + LDA with AUC of 0.825. For SVM-based modes, Distance Correlation + SVM represented the most promising diagnostic performance with AUC of 0.808. And for RF-based models, Distance Correlation + RF were observed to be the optimal model with AUC of 0.821.

Conclusion

Radiomic-based machine-learning has the potential to be utilized in differentiating atypical LGA from AA with reliable diagnostic performance.

Accuracy of Machine Learning Algorithms for the Classification of Molecular Features of Gliomas on MRI: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis

Simple Summary

Glioma prognosis and treatment are based on histopathological characteristics and molecular profile. Following the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines (2016), the most important molecular diagnostic markers include IDH1/2-genotype and 1p/19q codeletion status, although more recent publications also include ARTX genotype and TERT- and MGMT promoter methylation. Machine learning algorithms (MLAs), however, were described to successfully determine these molecular characteristics non-invasively by using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data. The aim of this review and meta-analysis was to define the diagnostic accuracy of MLAs with regard to these different molecular markers. We found high accuracies of MLAs to predict each individual molecular marker, with IDH1/2-genotype being the most investigated and the most accurate. Radiogenomics could therefore be a promising tool for discriminating genetically determined gliomas in a non-invasive fashion. Although encouraging results are presented here, large-scale, prospective trials with external validation groups are warranted.

Abstract

Treatment planning and prognosis in glioma treatment are based on the classification into low- and high-grade oligodendroglioma or astrocytoma, which is mainly based on molecular characteristics (IDH1/2- and 1p/19q codeletion status). It would be of great value if this classification could be made reliably before surgery, without biopsy. Machine learning algorithms (MLAs) could play a role in achieving this by enabling glioma characterization on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data without invasive tissue sampling. The aim of this study is to provide a performance evaluation and meta-analysis of various MLAs for glioma characterization. Systematic literature search and meta-analysis were performed on the aggregated data, after which subgroup analyses for several target conditions were conducted. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42020191033. We identified 724 studies; 60 and 17 studies were eligible to be included in the systematic review and meta-analysis, respectively. Meta-analysis showed excellent accuracy for all subgroups, with the classification of 1p/19q codeletion status scoring significantly poorer than other subgroups (AUC: 0.748, p = 0.132). There was considerable heterogeneity among some of the included studies. Although promising results were found with regard to the ability of MLA-tools to be used for the non-invasive classification of gliomas, large-scale, prospective trials with external validation are warranted in the future.

Machine learning applications to neuroimaging for glioma detection and classification: An artificial intelligence augmented systematic review

Glioma is the most common primary intraparenchymal tumor of the brain and the 5-year survival rate of high-grade glioma is poor. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is essential for detecting, characterizing and monitoring brain tumors but definitive diagnosis still relies on surgical pathology. Machine learning has been applied to the analysis of MRI data in glioma research and has the potential to change clinical practice and improve patient outcomes. This systematic review synthesizes and analyzes the current state of machine learning applications to glioma MRI data and explores the use of machine learning for systematic review automation. Various datapoints were extracted from the 153 studies that met inclusion criteria and analyzed. Natural language processing (NLP) analysis involved keyword extraction, topic modeling and document classification. Machine learning has been applied to tumor grading and diagnosis, tumor segmentation, non-invasive genomic biomarker identification, detection of progression and patient survival prediction. Model performance was generally strong (AUC = 0.87 ± 0.09; sensitivity = 0.87 ± 0.10; specificity = 0.0.86 ± 0.10; precision = 0.88 ± 0.11). Convolutional neural network, support vector machine and random forest algorithms were top performers. Deep learning document classifiers yielded acceptable performance (mean 5-fold cross-validation AUC = 0.71). Machine learning tools and data resources were synthesized and summarized to facilitate future research. Machine learning has been widely applied to the processing of MRI data in glioma research and has demonstrated substantial utility. NLP and transfer learning resources enabled the successful development of a replicable method for automating the systematic review article screening process, which has potential for shortening the time from discovery to clinical application in medicine.

Machine Learning for the Prediction of Molecular Markers in Glioma on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Molecular characterization of glioma has implications for prognosis, treatment planning, and prediction of treatment response. Current histopathology is limited by intratumoral heterogeneity and variability in detection methods. Advances in computational techniques have led to interest in mining quantitative imaging features to noninvasively detect genetic mutations.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of machine learning (ML) models in molecular subtyping gliomas on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

A systematic search was performed following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines to identify studies up to April 1, 2020. Methodological quality of studies was assessed using the Quality Assessment for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS)-2. Diagnostic performance estimates were obtained using a bivariate model and heterogeneity was explored using metaregression.

RESULTS

Forty-four original articles were included. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for predicting isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation in training datasets were 0.88 (95% CI 0.83-0.91) and 0.86 (95% CI 0.79-0.91), respectively, and 0.83 to 0.85 in validation sets. Use of data augmentation and MRI sequence type were weakly associated with heterogeneity. Both O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene promoter methylation and 1p/19q codeletion could be predicted with a pooled sensitivity and specificity between 0.76 and 0.83 in training datasets.

CONCLUSION

ML application to preoperative MRI demonstrated promising results for predicting IDH mutation, MGMT methylation, and 1p/19q codeletion in glioma. Optimized ML models could lead to a noninvasive, objective tool that captures molecular information important for clinical decision making. Future studies should use multicenter data, external validation and investigate clinical feasibility of ML models.

Qualitative and Quantitative MRI Analysis in IDH1 Genotype Prediction of Lower-Grade Gliomas: A Machine Learning Approach

Purpose

Preoperative prediction of isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutation in lower-grade gliomas (LGGs) is crucial for clinical decision-making. This study aimed to examine the predictive value of a machine learning approach using qualitative and quantitative MRI features to identify the IDH1 mutation in LGGs.

Materials and Methods

A total of 102 LGG patients were allocated to training (n = 67) and validation (n = 35) cohorts and were subject to Visually Accessible Rembrandt Images (VASARI) feature extraction (23 features) from conventional multimodal MRI and radiomics feature extraction (56 features) from apparent diffusion coefficient maps. Feature selection was conducted using the maximum Relevance Minimum Redundancy method and 0.632+ bootstrap method. A machine learning model to predict IDH1 mutation was then established using a random forest classifier. The predictive performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

Results

After feature selection, the top 5 VASARI features were enhancement quality, deep white matter invasion, tumor location, proportion of necrosis, and T1/FLAIR ratio, and the top 10 radiomics features included 3 histogram features, 3 gray-level run-length matrix features, and 3 gray-level size zone matrix features and one shape feature. Using the optimal VASARI or radiomics feature sets for IDH1 prediction, the trained model achieved an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.779 ± 0.001 or 0.849 ± 0.008 on the validation cohort, respectively. The fusion model that integrated outputs of both optimal VASARI and radiomics models improved the AUC to 0.879.

Conclusion

The proposed machine learning approach using VASARI and radiomics features can predict IDH1 mutation in LGGs.

Differentiation of Treatment-Related Effects from Glioma Recurrence Using Machine Learning Classifiers Based Upon Pre-and Post-Contrast T1WI and T2 FLAIR Subtraction Features: A Two-Center Study

Purpose

We propose three support vector machine (SVM) classifiers, using pre-and post-contrast T2 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) subtraction and/or pre-and post-contrast T1WI subtraction, to differentiate treatment-related effects (TRE) from glioma recurrence.

Materials and Methods

Fifty-six postoperative high-grade glioma patients with suspicious progression after radiotherapy and chemotherapy from two centers were studied. Pre-and post-contrast T1WI and T2 FLAIR were collected. Each pre-contrast image was voxel-wise subtracted from the co-registered post-contrast image. Dataset was randomly split into training, and testing on a 7:3 ratio, accordingly subjected to a five fold cross validation. Best feature subsets were selected by Pearson correlation coefficient and recursive feature elimination, whereupon a radiomics classifier was built with SVM. The discriminating performance was assessed with the area under receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV).

Results

In all, 186 features were extracted on each subtraction map. Top nine T1WI subtraction features, top thirteen T2 FLAIR subtraction features and top thirteen combination features were selected to build optimal SVM classifiers accordingly. The accuracies/AUCs/sensitivity/specificity/PPV/NPV of SVM based on sole T1WI subtraction were 80.00%/80.00% (CI: 0.5370–1.0000)/100%/70.00%/62.50%/100%. Those results of SVM based on sole T2 FLAIR subtraction were 86.67%/84.00% (CI: 0.5962–1.0000)/100%/80%/71.43%/100%. Those results of SVM based on both T1WI subtraction and T2 FLAIR subtraction were 93.33%/94.00% (CI: 0.7778–1.0000)/100%/90%/83.33%/100%, respectively.

Conclusion

Pre- and post-contrast T2 FLAIR subtraction provided added value for diagnosis between recurrence and TRE. SVM based on a combination of T1WI and T2 FLAIR subtraction maps was superior to the sole use of T1WI or T2 FLAIR for differentiating TRE from recurrence. The SVM classifier based on combination of pre-and post-contrast subtraction T2 FLAIR and T1WI imaging allowed for the accurate differential diagnosis of TRE from recurrence, which is of paramount importance for treatment management of postoperative glioma patients after radiation therapy.

Conventional magnetic resonance imaging-based radiomic signature predicts telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter mutation status in grade II and III gliomas

PURPOSE

Telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter mutation status is an important biomarker for the precision diagnosis and prognosis prediction of lower grade glioma (LGG). This study aimed to construct a radiomic signature to noninvasively predict the TERT promoter status in LGGs.

METHODS

Eighty-three local patients with pathology-confirmed LGG were retrospectively included as a training cohort, and 33 patients from The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) were used as for independent validation. Three types of regions of interest (ROIs), which covered the tumor, peri-tumoral area, and tumor plus peri-tumoral area, were delineated on three-dimensional contrast-enhanced T1 (3D-CE-T1)-weighted and T2-weighted images. One hundred seven shape, first-order, and texture radiomic features from each modality under each ROI were extracted and selected through least absolute shrinkage and selection operator. Radiomic signatures were constructed with multiple classifiers and evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The tumors were also stratified according to IDH status.

RESULTS

Three radiomic signatures, namely, tumoral radiomic signature, tumoral plus peri-tumoral radiomic signature, and fusion radiomic signature, were built, all of which exhibited good accuracy and balanced sensitivity and specificity. The tumoral signature displayed the best performance, with area under the ROC curves (AUC) of 0.948 (0.903-0.993) in the training cohort and 0.827 (0.667-0.988) in the validation cohort. In the IDH subgroups, the AUCs of the tumoral signature ranged from 0.750 to 0.940.

CONCLUSION

The MRI-based radiomic signature is reliable for noninvasive evaluation of TERT promoter mutations in LGG regardless of the IDH status. The inclusion of peri-tumoral area did not significantly improve the performance.

Radiological differences between subtypes of WHO 2016 grade II-III gliomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation and 1p/19q-codeletion are oncogenetic alterations with a positive prognostic value for diffuse gliomas, especially grade II and III. Some studies have suggested differences in biological behavior as reflected by radiological characteristics. In this paper, the literature regarding radiological characteristics in grade II and III glioma subtypes was systematically evaluated and a meta-analysis was performed.

METHODS

Studies that addressed the relationship between conventional radiological characteristics and IDH mutations and/or 1p/19q-codeletions in newly diagnosed, grade II and III gliomas of adult patients were included. The "3-group analysis" compared radiological characteristics between the WHO 2016 glioma subtypes (IDH-mutant astrocytoma, IDH-wildtype astrocytoma, and oligodendroglioma), and the "2-group analysis" compared radiological characteristics between 1p/19q-codeleted gliomas and 1p/19q-intact gliomas.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies (3-group analysis: 670 cases, 2-group analysis: 1042 cases) were included. IDH-mutated astrocytomas showed more often sharp borders and less frequently contrast enhancement compared to IDH-wildtype astrocytomas. 1p/19q-codeleted gliomas had less frequently sharp borders, but showed a heterogeneous aspect, calcification, cysts, and edema more frequently. For the 1p/19q-codeleted gliomas, a sensitivity of 96% was found for heterogeneity and a specificity of 88.1% for calcification.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant differences in conventional radiological characteristics exist between the WHO 2016 glioma subtypes, which may reflect differences in biological behavior. However, the diagnostic value of the independent radiological characteristics is insufficient to reliably predict the molecular genetic subtype.

Application of MR morphologic, diffusion tensor, and perfusion imaging in the classification of brain tumors using machine learning scheme

PURPOSE

While MRI is the modality of choice for the assessment of patients with brain tumors, differentiation between various tumors based on their imaging characteristics might be challenging due to overlapping imaging features. The purpose of this study was to apply a machine learning scheme using basic and advanced MR sequences for distinguishing different types of brain tumors.

METHODS

The study cohort included 141 patients (41 glioblastoma, 38 metastasis, 50 meningioma, and 12 primary central nervous system lymphoma). A computer-assisted classification scheme, combining morphologic MRI, perfusion MRI, and DTI metrics, was developed and used for tumor classification. The proposed multistep scheme consists of pre-processing, ROI definition, features extraction, feature selection, and classification. Feature subset selection was performed using support vector machines (SVMs). Classification performance was assessed by leave-one-out cross-validation. Given an ROI, the entire classification process was done automatically via computer and without any human intervention.

RESULTS

A binary hierarchical classification tree was chosen. In the first step, selected features were chosen for distinguishing glioblastoma from the remaining three classes, followed by separation of meningioma from metastasis and PCNSL, and then to discriminate PCNSL from metastasis. The binary SVM classification accuracy, sensitivity and specificity for glioblastoma, metastasis, meningiomas, and primary central nervous system lymphoma were 95.7, 81.6, and 91.2%; 92.7, 95.1, and 93.6%; 97, 90.8, and 58.3%; and 91.5, 90, and 96.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

A machine learning scheme using data from anatomical and advanced MRI sequences resulted in high-performance automatic tumor classification algorithm. Such a scheme can be integrated into clinical decision support systems to optimize tumor classification.

Automation and artificial intelligence in the clinical laboratory

The daily operation of clinical laboratories will be drastically impacted by two disruptive technologies: automation and artificial intelligence (the development and use of computer systems able to perform tasks that normally require human intelligence). These technologies will also expand the scope of laboratory medicine. Automation will result in increased efficiency but will require changes to laboratory infrastructure and a shift in workforce training requirements. The application of artificial intelligence to large clinical datasets generated through increased automation will lead to the development of new diagnostic and prognostic models. Together, automation and artificial intelligence will support the move to personalized medicine. Changes in pathology and clinical doctoral scientist training will be necessary to fully participate in these changes. KEYWORDS: Automation; artificial intelligence; deep learning; laboratory medicine.