Automated apparent diffusion coefficient analysis for genotype prediction in lower grade glioma: association with the T2-FLAIR mismatch sign

Clinicopathological and radiological characteristics of false-positive and false-negative results in T2-FLAIR mismatch sign of IDH-mutated gliomas

PURPOSE

To explore the clinicopathological and radiological characteristics associated with false-positive and false-negative results in the identification of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations in gliomas using the T2-fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) mismatch sign.

METHODS

In 1515 patients with cerebral gliomas, tumor location, restricted diffusion using diffusion-weighted imaging, and the T2-FLAIR mismatch sign were retrospectively analyzed using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Moreover, both the false-positive and false-negative results of the T2-FLAIR mismatch sign were obtained. Univariate and multivariate logistic analyses were performed to evaluate the risk factors associated with false-positive and false-negative results.

RESULTS

The overall false-positive rate was 3.5 % (53/1515), and its independent risk factors were the patient's age (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.977; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.957, 0.997; P = 0.027) and non-restricted diffusion (adjusted OR, 1.968; 95 % CI, 1.060, 3.652; P = 0.032). The overall false-negative rate was 39.7 % (602/1515); its independent risk factors were the patient's age (adjusted OR, 1.022; 95 % CI, 1.005, 1.038; P = 0.008), 1p/19q co-deletion (adjusted OR, 3.334; 95 % CI, 1.913, 5.810; P < 0.001), and telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter mutation (adjusted OR, 2.004; 95 % CI, 1.181, 3.402; P = 0.010). For the mismatch sign in idiopathic IDH, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.602. The combined AUC for the T2-FLAIR mismatch sign and risk factors was 0.871.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicopathological and radiological characteristics can lead to the misinterpretation of IDH status in gliomas based on the T2-FLAIR mismatch sign. However, this can be avoided if careful attention is paid.

The T2-FLAIR mismatch sign in oncologic neuroradiology: History, current use, emerging data, and future directions

The T2-Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery (T2-FLAIR) mismatch sign is a radiogenomic marker that is easily discernible on preoperative conventional MR imaging. Application of strict criteria (adult population, cerebral hemisphere location, and classic imaging morphology) permits the noninvasive preoperative diagnosis of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant 1p/19q-non-codeleted diffuse astrocytoma with near-perfect specificity, albeit with variably low sensitivity. This leads to improved preoperative planning and patient counseling. More recent research has shown that the application of less strict criteria compromises the near-perfect specificity of the sign but remains adequate for ruling out IDH-wildtype (glioblastoma) phenotype, which bears a far grimmer prognosis compared to IDH-mutant diffuse astrocytic disease. In this review, we elaborate on the various definitions of the T2-FLAIR mismatch sign present in the literature, illustrate these with images obtained at a comprehensive cancer center, discuss the potential of the mismatch sign for application to certain pediatric-type brain tumors, namely dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumor and diffuse midline glioma, and elaborate upon the clinical, histologic, and molecular associations of the T2-FLAIR mismatch sign as recognized to date. Finally, the sign's correlates in diffusion- and perfusion-weighted imaging are presented, and opportunities to further maximize the diagnostic and prognostic applications of the sign in the context of the 2021 revision of the WHO Classification of Central Nervous System Tumors are discussed.

T2-FLAIR mismatch sign and machine learning-based multiparametric MRI radiomics in predicting IDH mutant 1p/19q non-co-deleted diffuse lower-grade gliomas

AIM

To investigate the application of the T2-weighted (T2)-fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) mismatch sign and machine learning-based multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics in predicting 1p/19q non-co-deletion of lower-grade gliomas (LGGs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred and forty-six patients, who had pathologically confirmed isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutant LGGs were assigned randomly to the training cohort (n=102) and the testing cohort (n=44) at a ratio of 7:3. The T2-FLAIR mismatch sign and conventional MRI features were evaluated. Radiomics features extracted from T1-weighted imaging (T1WI), T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), FLAIR, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and contrast-enhanced T1WI images (CE-T1WI). The models that displayed the best performance of each sequence were selected, and their predicted values as well as the T2-FLAIR mismatch sign data were collected to establish a final stacking model. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analyses and area under the curve (AUC) values were applied to evaluate and compare the performance of the models.

RESULTS

The T2-FLAIR mismatch sign was more common in the IDH mutant 1p/19q non-co-deleted group (p<0.05) and the area under the curve (AUC) value was 0.692 with sensitivity 0.397, specificity 0.987, and accuracy 0.712, respectively. The stacking model showed a favourable performance with an AUC of 0.925 and accuracy of 0.882 in the training cohort and an AUC of 0.886 and accuracy of 0.864 in the testing cohort.

CONCLUSION

The stacking model based on multiparametric MRI can serve as a supplementary tool for pathological diagnosis, offering valuable guidance for clinical practice.

Combining Multi-Shell Diffusion with Conventional MRI Improves Molecular Diagnosis of Diffuse Gliomas with Deep Learning

The WHO classification since 2016 confirms the importance of integrating molecular diagnosis for prognosis and treatment decisions of adult-type diffuse gliomas. This motivates the development of non-invasive diagnostic methods, in particular MRI, to predict molecular subtypes of gliomas before surgery. At present, this development has been focused on deep-learning (DL)-based predictive models, mainly with conventional MRI (cMRI), despite recent studies suggesting multi-shell diffusion MRI (dMRI) offers complementary information to cMRI for molecular subtyping. The aim of this work is to evaluate the potential benefit of combining cMRI and multi-shell dMRI in DL-based models. A model implemented with deep residual neural networks was chosen as an illustrative example. Using a dataset of 146 patients with gliomas (from grade 2 to 4), the model was trained and evaluated, with nested cross-validation, on pre-operative cMRI, multi-shell dMRI, and a combination of the two for the following classification tasks: (i) IDH-mutation; (ii) 1p/19q-codeletion; and (iii) three molecular subtypes according to WHO 2021. The results from a subset of 100 patients with lower grades gliomas (2 and 3 according to WHO 2016) demonstrated that combining cMRI and multi-shell dMRI enabled the best performance in predicting IDH mutation and 1p/19q codeletion, achieving an accuracy of 75 ± 9% in predicting the IDH-mutation status, higher than using cMRI and multi-shell dMRI separately (both 70 ± 7%). Similar findings were observed for predicting the 1p/19q-codeletion status, with the accuracy from combining cMRI and multi-shell dMRI (72 ± 4%) higher than from each modality used alone (cMRI: 65 ± 6%; multi-shell dMRI: 66 ± 9%). These findings remain when we considered all 146 patients for predicting the IDH status (combined: 81 ± 5% accuracy; cMRI: 74 ± 5%; multi-shell dMRI: 73 ± 6%) and for the diagnosis of the three molecular subtypes according to WHO 2021 (combined: 60 ± 5%; cMRI: 57 ± 8%; multi-shell dMRI: 56 ± 7%). Together, these findings suggest that combining cMRI and multi-shell dMRI can offer higher accuracy than using each modality alone for predicting the IDH and 1p/19q status and in diagnosing the three molecular subtypes with DL-based models.

MRI features predict tumor grade in isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant astrocytoma and oligodendroglioma

PURPOSE

Nearly all literature for predicting tumor grade in astrocytoma and oligodendroglioma pre-dates the molecular classification system. We investigated the association between contrast enhancement, ADC, and rCBV with tumor grade separately for IDH-mutant astrocytomas and molecularly-defined oligodendrogliomas.

METHODS

For this retrospective study, 44 patients with IDH-mutant astrocytomas (WHO grades II, III, or IV) and 39 patients with oligodendrogliomas (IDH-mutant and 1p/19q codeleted) (WHO grade II or III) were enrolled. Two readers independently assessed preoperative MRI for contrast enhancement, ADC, and rCBV. Inter-reader agreement was calculated, and statistical associations between MRI metrics and WHO grade were determined per reader.

RESULTS

For IDH-mutant astrocytomas, both readers found a stepwise positive association between contrast enhancement and WHO grade (Reader A: OR 7.79 [1.97, 30.80], p = 0.003; Reader B: OR 6.62 [1.70, 25.82], p = 0.006); both readers found that ADC was negatively associated with WHO grade (Reader A: OR 0.74 [0.61, 0.90], p = 0.002); Reader B: OR 0.80 [0.66, 0.96], p = 0.017), and both readers found that rCBV was positively associated with WHO grade (Reader A: OR 2.33 [1.35, 4.00], p = 0.002; Reader B: OR 2.13 [1.30, 3.57], p = 0.003). For oligodendrogliomas, both readers found a positive association between contrast enhancement and WHO grade (Reader A: OR 15.33 [2.56, 91.95], p = 0.003; Reader B: OR 20.00 [2.19, 182.45], p = 0.008), but neither reader found an association between ADC or rCBV and WHO grade.

CONCLUSIONS

Contrast enhancement predicts WHO grade for IDH-mutant astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas. ADC and rCBV predict WHO grade for IDH-mutant astrocytomas, but not for oligodendrogliomas.

Effect of Licochalcone-A Combined with Rab23 Gene on Proliferation of Glioma U251 Cells

This research aimed to explore the effect of Licochalcone-A (LCA) combined with Rab23 gene on the proliferation, migration, and invasion of glioma U251 cells through the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. The glioma U251 cell line was taken as the research object, and the Rab23 overexpression plasmid was constructed. According to the treatment method, U251 cells were rolled into blank control group (BC), Rab23 overexpression plasmid transfection group (Rab23), 25 μmol·L⁻¹ LCA treatment group (LCA), and Rab23 overexpression plasmid transfection combined with 25 μmol·L⁻¹ LCA treatment group (Rab23 + LCA). Subsequently, the ability of cell proliferation, migration, and invasion of each group was detected by methyl thiazolyl tetrazolium (MTT) assay, scratch healing test, and Transwell cell invasion test, respectively. Western blot was implemented to detect the expression differences of cell proliferation antigen Ki-67, apoptosis-related proteins Bcl-2 and Bax, and Wnt/β-catenin pathway-related proteins β-catenin, glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK3β), Axin2, and c-myc. The results showed the successful construction of Rab23 overexpression and stable transfection U251 cell line. After grouping and treatments, the cell proliferation, migration, and invasion ability of the Rab23 group, LCA group, and Rab23 + LCA group was substantially reduced relative to BC group (P < 0.05). In addition, the cell proliferation, migration, and invasion ability of Rab23 + LCA group decreased relatively more significantly. The expression levels of Ki-67, Bcl-2, β-catenin, and c-myc in the Rab23, LCA, and Rab23 + LCA groups were greatly lower versus those of BC group. Moreover, the protein expression levels of Bax, GSK3β, and Axin2 were considerably increased (P < 0.05), while the expression of protein in Rab23 + LCA group increased notably. These findings indicate that LCA combined with Rab23 gene can inhibit the proliferation, migration, and invasion of glioma U251 cells through the Wnt/β-catenin signaling and can promote cell apoptosis.

Radiogenomic association between the T2-FLAIR mismatch sign and IDH mutation status in adult patients with lower-grade gliomas: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To reveal a radiogenomic correlation between the presence of the T2-fluid-attenuated inversion recovery resection (T2-FLAIR) mismatch sign on MR images and isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation status in adult patients with lower-grade gliomas (LGGs).

METHODS

A web-based systemic search for eligible literature up to April 13, 2021, was conducted on PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases by two independent reviewers. This study was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. We included studies evaluating the accuracy of the T2-FLAIR mismatch sign in diagnosing the IDH mutation in adult patients with LGGs. The T2-FLAIR mismatch sign was defined as a T2-hyperintense lesion that is hypointense on FLAIR except for a hyperintense rim.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies (n = 1986) were finally identified. The mean age of patients in the included studies ranged from 38.5 to 56 years. The pooled area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity were obtained for each molecular profile: IDHmut-Codel: 0.46 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.42-0.50), 1% (95%CI: 0-7%), and 69% (95%CI: 62-75%), respectively; IDHmut-Noncodel: 0.75 (95%CI: 0.71-0.79), 42% (95%CI: 34-50%), and 99% (95%CI: 96-100%), respectively; IDH-Mutation regardless of 1p/19q codeletion status: 0.77 (95%CI: 0.73-0.80), 29% (95%CI: 21-40%), and 99% (95%CI: 92-100%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The T2-FLAIR mismatch sign was an insensitive but highly specific marker for IDHmut-Noncodel and IDH-Mutation LGGs, whereas it was not a useful marker for IDHmut-Codel LGGs. The findings might identify the T2-FLAIR mismatch sign as a non-invasive imaging biomarker for the selection of patients with IDH-mutant LGGs.

KEY POINTS

• The T2-FLAIR mismatch sign was not a sensitive sign for IDH mutation in LGGs. • The T2-FLAIR mismatch sign was related to IDHmut-Noncodel with a specificity of 99%. • The pooled specificity (69%) of the T2-FLAIR mismatch sign for IDHmut-Codel was low.

Dynamic susceptibility contrast-MRI parameters, ADC values, and the T2-FLAIR mismatch sign are useful to differentiate between H3-mutant and H3-wild-type high-grade midline glioma

OBJECTIVES

Diffuse midline gliomas, H3K27-altered (DMG-A), are malignant gliomas with an unfavorable prognosis. Knowledge of dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MRI findings and imaging differences with high-grade midline glioma without H3K27 alteration (DMG-W) has been limited. We compared the DSC, ADC, and conventional MRI findings between DMG-A and DMG-W.

METHODS

In this single institutional retrospective study, the electronic database of our hospital between June 2015 and May 2021 was searched. Twenty and 17 patients with DMG-A (median, 13 years; range, 3-52 years; 11 females) and DMG-W (median, 40 years; 7-73 years; 9 females), respectively, were found. Normalized relative cerebral blood flow (nrCBF) and normalized corrected relative cerebral blood volume (ncrCBV); normalized maximum, mean, and minimum ADC values; and the prevalence of T2-FLAIR mismatch sign were compared between the two groups using Mann-Whitney U tests and Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

The nrCBF and ncrCBV were significantly lower in DMG-A compared with DMG-W (nrCBF: median 0.88 [range, 0.19-2.67] vs. 1.47 [range, 0.57-4.90] (p < 0.001); ncrCBV: 1.17 [0.20-2.67] vs. 1.56 [0.60-4.03] (p = 0.008)). Normalized maximum ADC (nADC_max) was significantly higher in DMG-A (median 2.37 [1.25-3.98] vs. 1.95 [1.23-2.77], p = 0.02). T2-FLAIR mismatch sign was significantly more common in DMG-A (11/20 (55.0%) vs. 1/17 (5.9%), p = 0.0017). When at least two of nrCBF < 1.11, nADC_max ≥ 2.48, and T2-FLAIR mismatch sign were positive, the diagnostic performance was the highest with accuracy of 0.81.

CONCLUSION

DSC-MRI parameters, ADC values, and the T2-FLAIR mismatch sign are useful to differentiate between DMG-A and DMG-W.

KEY POINTS

• Diffuse midline glioma, H3K27-altered (DMG-A), showed a significantly lower normalized relative cerebral blood flow and volume compared with H3K27-wild-type counterparts (DMG-W). • T2-fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) mismatch sign was significantly more frequent in DMG-A compared to DMG-W. • Indicators that combined DSC parameters, ADC values, and T2-FLAIR mismatch sign, with or without age, are useful to distinguish the two tumors.

Quantifying T2-FLAIR Mismatch Using Geographically Weighted Regression and Predicting Molecular Status in Lower-Grade Gliomas

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The T2-FLAIR mismatch sign is a validated imaging sign of isocitrate dehydrogenase-mutant 1p/19q noncodeleted gliomas. It is identified by radiologists through visual inspection of preoperative MR imaging scans and has been shown to identify isocitrate dehydrogenase-mutant 1p/19q noncodeleted gliomas with a high positive predictive value. We have developed an approach to quantify the T2-FLAIR mismatch signature and use it to predict the molecular status of lower-grade gliomas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used multiparametric MR imaging scans and segmentation labels of 108 preoperative lower-grade glioma tumors from The Cancer Imaging Archive. Clinical information and T2-FLAIR mismatch sign labels were obtained from supplementary material of relevant publications. We adopted an objective analytic approach to estimate this sign through a geographically weighted regression and used the residuals for each case to construct a probability density function (serving as a residual signature). These functions were then analyzed using an appropriate statistical framework.

RESULTS

We observed statistically significant (P value = .05) differences between the averages of residual signatures for an isocitrate dehydrogenase-mutant 1p/19q noncodeleted class of tumors versus other categories. Our classifier predicts these cases with area under the curve of 0.98 and high specificity and sensitivity. It also predicts the T2-FLAIR mismatch sign within these cases with an under the curve of 0.93.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of this retrospective study, we show that geographically weighted regression-based residual signatures are highly informative of the T2-FLAIR mismatch sign and can identify isocitrate dehydrogenase-mutation and 1p/19q codeletion status with high predictive power. The utility of the proposed quantification of the T2-FLAIR mismatch sign can be potentially validated through a prospective multi-institutional study.

Predictive accuracy of T2-FLAIR mismatch sign for the IDH-mutant, 1p/19q noncodeleted low-grade glioma: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The T2-fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) mismatch sign, has been considered a highly specific imaging biomarker of IDH-mutant, 1p/19q noncodeleted low-grade glioma. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of T2-FLAIR mismatch sign for prediction of a patient with IDH-mutant, 1p/19q noncodeleted low-grade glioma, and identify the causes responsible for the heterogeneity across the included studies.

METHODS

A systematic literature search in the Ovid-MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was performed for studies reporting the relevant topic before November 17, 2020. The pooled sensitivity and specificity values with their 95% confidence intervals were calculated using bivariate random-effects modeling. Meta-regression analyses were also performed to determine factors influencing heterogeneity.

RESULTS

For all the 10 included cohorts from 8 studies, the pooled sensitivity was 40% (95% confidence interval [CI] 28-53%), and the pooled specificity was 100% (95% CI 95-100%). In the hierarchic summary receiver operating characteristic curve, the difference between the 95% confidence and prediction regions was relatively large, indicating heterogeneity among the studies. Higgins I2 statistics demonstrated considerable heterogeneity in sensitivity (I2 = 83.5%) and considerable heterogeneity in specificity (I2 = 95.83%). Among the potential covariates, it seemed that none of factors was significantly associated with study heterogeneity in the joint model. However, the specificity was increased in studies with all the factors based on the differences in the composition of the detailed tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

The T2-FLAIR mismatch sign is near-perfect specific marker of IDH mutation and 1p/19q noncodeletion.

Development and Validation of an Efficient MRI Radiomics Signature for Improving the Predictive Performance of 1p/19q Co-Deletion in Lower-Grade Gliomas

Simple Summary

Low-grade gliomas (LGG) with the 1p/19q co-deletion mutation have been proven to have a better survival prognosis and response to treatment than individuals without the mutation. Identifying this mutation has a vital role in managing LGG patients; however, the current diagnostic gold standard, including the brain-tissue biopsy or the surgical resection of the tumor, remains highly invasive and time-consuming. We proposed a model based on the eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) classifier to detect 1p/19q co-deletion mutation using non-invasive medical images. The performance of our model achieved 87% and 82.8% accuracy on the training and external test set, respectively. Significantly, the prediction was based on only seven optimal wavelet radiomics features extracted from brain Magnetic Resonance (MR) images. We believe that this model can address clinicians in the rapid diagnosis of clinical 1p/19q co-deletion mutation, thereby improving the treatment prognosis of LGG patients.

Abstract

The prognosis and treatment plans for patients diagnosed with low-grade gliomas (LGGs) may significantly be improved if there is evidence of chromosome 1p/19q co-deletion mutation. Many studies proved that the codeletion status of 1p/19q enhances the sensitivity of the tumor to different types of therapeutics. However, the current clinical gold standard of detecting this chromosomal mutation remains invasive and poses implicit risks to patients. Radiomics features derived from medical images have been used as a new approach for non-invasive diagnosis and clinical decisions. This study proposed an eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost)-based model to predict the 1p/19q codeletion status in a binary classification task. We trained our model on the public database extracted from The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA), including 159 LGG patients with 1p/19q co-deletion mutation status. The XGBoost was the baseline algorithm, and we combined the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis to select the seven most optimal radiomics features to build the final predictive model. Our final model achieved an accuracy of 87% and 82.8% on the training set and external test set, respectively. With seven wavelet radiomics features, our XGBoost-based model can identify the 1p/19q codeletion status in LGG-diagnosed patients for better management and address the drawbacks of invasive gold-standard tests in clinical practice.

The T2-FLAIR Mismatch Sign as an Imaging Indicator of IDH-Mutant, 1p/19q Non-Codeleted Lower Grade Gliomas: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Accuracy Meta-Analysis

The study's objective was the evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of the T2-FLAIR mismatch sign in terms of diagnosing IDH-mutant non-codeleted (IDHmut-Noncodel) lower grade gliomas (LGG) of the brain. We searched the MEDLINE, Scopus and Cochrane Central databases. The last database search was performed on 12 April 2021. Studies that met the following were included: MRI scan assessing the presence of T2-FLAIR mismatch sign, and available IDH mutation and 1p/19q codeletion status. The quality of studies was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Twelve studies involving 14 cohorts were included in the quantitative analysis. The diagnostic odds ratio [DOR (95% confidence interval; CI)] was estimated at 34.42 (20.95, 56.56), P_z < 0.01. Pooled sensitivity and specificity (95% CI) were estimated at 40% (31-50%; P_z = 0.05) and 97% (93-99%; P_z < 0.01), respectively. The likelihood ratio (LR; 95% CI) for a positive test was 11.39 (6.10, 21.29; P_z < 0.01) and the LR (95% CI) for a negative test was 0.40 (0.24, 0.65; P_z < 0.01).The T2-FLAIR mismatch sign is a highly specific biomarker for the diagnosis of IDHmut-Noncodel LGGs. However, the test was found positive in some other tumors and had a high number of false negative results. The diagnostic accuracy of the mismatch sign might be improved when combined with further imaging parameters.

MRI biomarkers in neuro-oncology

The central role of MRI in neuro-oncology is undisputed. The technique is used, both in clinical practice and in clinical trials, to diagnose and monitor disease activity, support treatment decision-making, guide the use of focused treatments and determine response to treatment. Despite recent substantial advances in imaging technology and image analysis techniques, clinical MRI is still primarily used for the qualitative subjective interpretation of macrostructural features, as opposed to quantitative analyses that take into consideration multiple pathophysiological features. However, the field of quantitative imaging and imaging biomarker development is maturing. The European Imaging Biomarkers Alliance (EIBALL) and Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance (QIBA) are setting standards for biomarker development, validation and implementation, as well as promoting the use of quantitative imaging and imaging biomarkers by demonstrating their clinical value. In parallel, advanced imaging techniques are reaching the clinical arena, providing quantitative, commonly physiological imaging parameters that are driving the discovery, validation and implementation of quantitative imaging and imaging biomarkers in the clinical routine. Additionally, computational analysis techniques are increasingly being used in the research setting to convert medical images into objective high-dimensional data and define radiomic signatures of disease states. Here, I review the definition and current state of MRI biomarkers in neuro-oncology, and discuss the clinical potential of quantitative image analysis techniques.

Fluid attenuation in non-contrast-enhancing tumor (nCET): an MRI Marker for Isocitrate Dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation in Glioblastoma

PURPOSE

The WHO 2016 update classifies glioblastomas (WHO grade IV) according to isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) gene mutation status. We aimed to determine MRI-based metrics for predicting IDH mutation in glioblastoma.

METHODS

This retrospective study included glioblastoma cases (n = 199) with known IDH mutation status and pre-operative MRI (T1WI, T2WI, FLAIR, contrast-enhanced T1W1 at minimum). Two neuroradiologists determined the following MRI metrics: (1) primary lobe of involvement (frontal or non-frontal); (2) presence/absence of contrast-enhancement; (3) presence/absence of necrosis; (4) presence/absence of fluid attenuation in the non-contrast-enhancing tumor (nCET); (5) maximum width of peritumoral edema (cm); (6) presence/absence of multifocal disease. Inter-reader agreement was determined. After resolving discordant measurements, multivariate association between consensus MRI metrics/patient age and IDH mutation status was determined.

RESULTS

Among 199 glioblastomas, 16 were IDH-mutant. Inter-reader agreement was calculated for contrast-enhancement (ĸ = 0.49 [- 0.11-1.00]), necrosis (ĸ = 0.55 [0.34-0.76]), fluid attenuation in nCET (ĸ = 0.83 [0.68-0.99]), multifocal disease (ĸ = 0.55 [0.39-0.70]), and primary lobe (ĸ = 0.85 [0.80-0.91]). Mean difference for peritumoral edema width between readers was 0.3 cm [0.2-0.5], p < 0.001. Multivariate analysis uncovered significant associations between IDH-mutation and fluid attenuation in nCET (OR 82.9 [19.22, ∞], p < 0.001), younger age (OR 0.93 [0.86, 0.98], p = 0.009), frontal lobe location (OR 11.08 [1.14, 352.97], p = 0.037), and less peritumoral edema (OR 0.15 [0, 0.65], p = 0.044).

CONCLUSIONS

Conventional MRI metrics and patient age predict IDH-mutation status in glioblastoma. Among MRI markers, fluid attenuation in nCET represents a novel marker with high inter-reader agreement that is strongly associated with Glioblastoma, IDH-mutant.

Advancements in Neuroimaging to Unravel Biological and Molecular Features of Brain Tumors

Simple Summary

Advanced neuroimaging is gaining increasing relevance for the characterization and the molecular profiling of brain tumor tissue. On one hand, for some tumor types, the most widespread advanced techniques, investigating diffusion and perfusion features, have been proven clinically feasible and rather robust for diagnosis and prognosis stratification. In addition, 2-hydroxyglutarate spectroscopy, for the first time, offers the possibility to directly measure a crucial molecular marker. On the other hand, numerous innovative approaches have been explored for a refined evaluation of tumor microenvironments, particularly assessing microstructural and microvascular properties, and the potential applications of these techniques are vast and still to be fully explored.

Abstract

In recent years, the clinical assessment of primary brain tumors has been increasingly dependent on advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques in order to infer tumor pathophysiological characteristics, such as hemodynamics, metabolism, and microstructure. Quantitative radiomic data extracted from advanced MRI have risen as potential in vivo noninvasive biomarkers for predicting tumor grades and molecular subtypes, opening the era of “molecular imaging” and radiogenomics. This review presents the most relevant advancements in quantitative neuroimaging of advanced MRI techniques, by means of radiomics analysis, applied to primary brain tumors, including lower-grade glioma and glioblastoma, with a special focus on peculiar oncologic entities of current interest. Novel findings from diffusion MRI (dMRI), perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI), and MR spectroscopy (MRS) are hereby sifted in order to evaluate the role of quantitative imaging in neuro-oncology as a tool for predicting molecular profiles, stratifying prognosis, and characterizing tumor tissue microenvironments. Furthermore, innovative technological approaches are briefly addressed, including artificial intelligence contributions and ultra-high-field imaging new techniques. Lastly, after providing an overview of the advancements, we illustrate current clinical applications and future perspectives.