Dopamine agonists in prolactinomas: when to withdraw?

The Role of Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery in Microprolactinomas: A Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVE

Most patients with microprolactinomas require lifetime treatment with a dopamine agonist. Many patients in our center have sought endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery as an alternative therapy.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective cohort analysis of 42 patients with microprolactinoma who underwent endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery between January 2010 and December 2023 performed by experienced neurosurgeons in our center.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up duration was 30.17 months (range, 13.00-45.40 months). The short-term (postoperative day 1) remission rate was 95.24%, and the long-term (>1-year follow-up) remission rate was 92.86%. The pattern of prolactin level changes on postoperative day 1 was significantly associated with recurrence. In the hypoprolactinemia group, all 29 patients achieved remission at the 1-year follow-up. In patients with normal prolactin levels, 10 of 11 patients achieved remission, while 1 of 11 patients had recurrence at the 1-year follow-up. In the hyperprolactinemia group, 2 of 2 patients had recurrence at the 1-year follow-up. Moreover, adenoma location was significantly associated with recurrence. In the recurrent group (3 patients), 2 patients belonged to the uncertain group, while the third patient belonged to the lateral group. The surgical complications were temporary and resolved shortly after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

According to our findings, endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery performed on patients with microprolactinomas at advanced pituitary tumor centers could be an option with high success rates and low complications. Moreover, improving magnetic resonance imaging techniques and/or multidisciplinary team discussion before surgery for microprolactinoma could improve tumor remission after surgery.

Diagnosis and management of prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas: a Pituitary Society international Consensus Statement

This Consensus Statement from an international, multidisciplinary workshop sponsored by the Pituitary Society offers evidence-based graded consensus recommendations and key summary points for clinical practice on the diagnosis and management of prolactinomas. Epidemiology and pathogenesis, clinical presentation of disordered pituitary hormone secretion, assessment of hyperprolactinaemia and biochemical evaluation, optimal use of imaging strategies and disease-related complications are addressed. In-depth discussions present the latest evidence on treatment of prolactinoma, including efficacy, adverse effects and options for withdrawal of dopamine agonist therapy, as well as indications for surgery, preoperative medical therapy and radiation therapy. Management of prolactinoma in special situations is discussed, including cystic lesions, mixed growth hormone-secreting and prolactin-secreting adenomas and giant and aggressive prolactinomas. Furthermore, considerations for pregnancy and fertility are outlined, as well as management of prolactinomas in children and adolescents, patients with an underlying psychiatric disorder, postmenopausal women, transgender individuals and patients with chronic kidney disease. The workshop concluded that, although treatment resistance is rare, there is a need for additional therapeutic options to address clinical challenges in treating these patients and a need to facilitate international registries to enable risk stratification and optimization of therapeutic strategies.

Current and Perspective Approaches to the Treatment of Prolactinomas

Background

Along with the presence of the 2011 Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guidelines and numerous large-scale studies on the treatment of hyperprolactinemia of different origin, there are some unresolved questions, ambiguous and sometimes contradictory points of view regarding the management of patients with prolactinomas. This overview is devoted to the analysis of the results of modern clinical studies and the approaches towards the management of hyperprolactinemia caused by prolactinoma.

Materials and methods

A systematic research of the literature for the appropriate keywords published mainly for the last 10 years was done; also, a reference list of each selected article was analysed. We included to our review the articles reporting controversial issues or new data on the treatment of hyperprolactinemia.

Results

The review describes various problems arising during the treatment of prolactinoma. The presence of primary and secondary dopamine agonist resistance in each case requires an individual approach, and sometimes may include the use of the antineoplastic agent t emozolomide. The side effects of dopamine agonists are discussed, with quite rare ones, including valvulopathy, pathological psychological conditions and cerebrospinal rhinorrhea. The controversial issue of the duration and doses of the drug used to achieve a lasting effect in the treatment of prolactinomas is considered. There are some points connected with the frequency of relapses. Thus, recurrence is correlated to the duration of treatment with dopamine agonists, prolactin levels at diagnosis, and the initial tumor size. Metformin, somatostatin analogues, selective estrogen receptor modulators, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, inhibitors of the mammalian target of rapamycin, epidermal growth factor receptor antagonists are investigated nowadays as potential alternative methods of drug treatment of prolactinomas.

Conclusion

Drug therapy with dopamine agonists makes it possible to achieve the desired results in the vast majority of patients. However, despite the proven safety of this group of medicines, the risk of side effects should still be taken into account. The therapy regimen should be determined by the clinical course of prolactinoma and the patient's response to treatment. Other options of treatment should be considered in patients intolerant to medical therapy, with contraindication or resistance to dopamine agonists, in the case of a malignant tumor. The presence of refractory to any of the applied methods of treatment and aggressive prolactinomas leads to the search for new drugs.

Endoscopic Transnasal Approach for Microprolactinomas with Experience of 105 Cases in a Single Center: Paradigmal Shift for Conventional Medical Therapy

OBJECTIVE

The classically recommended first-line therapy for microprolactinomas is medical therapy. In the presence of drug resistance and intolerance after the use of dopamine agonists or when the patients prefer surgery instead of medication, surgical treatment is considered as second-line treatment. The high hormonal remission and low complication rates after surgery for microprolactinomas suggest that the surgical outcome of endoscopic surgeries may be better than medical therapy in well-selected patients. This study reports a large series of patients with microprolactinoma treated by endoscopic transnasal approach and evaluates the efficiency of surgical treatment.

METHODS

Our study is a retrospective cohort analysis of patients with microprolactinoma operated on by an endoscopic transnasal approach between August 1997 and February 2022 by an experienced pituitary surgeon in a single tertiary center. Inclusion criteria for microprolactinoma were based on increased prolactin levels, microadenoma (<10 mm in diameter) on pituitary magnetic resonance imaging, and histopathologically verified lactotroph adenoma.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 74.90 months (range, 6-207). The postoperative day 1 remission rate was 85.7% and the long-term remission rate was 74.3%. The long-term remission rates of the patients in the preference group were significantly higher than those of the patients in the resistant or intolerance group (P = 0.002). Patients who used dopamine agonists for more than 3 years had a lower remission rate compared with patients who used dopamine agonists for a shorter period or who did not use it (P = 0.01). The surgical complication rate was 4.76%.

CONCLUSIONS

According to our findings, endoscopic transnasal surgery performed by an experienced neurosurgeon in well-selected patients with microprolactinoma can be offered with cure rates superior to medical therapy and may be an alternative first-line treatment option to dopamine agonists.

Cabergoline Failure and a Spontaneous Pregnancy in a Microprolactinoma with High Prolactin Levels

We report a particular case of a spontaneously occurring pregnancy in a long-term amenorrheic patient due to a prolactinoma with high serum prolactin (PRL) following the failure of dopamine agonist therapy (DA) for infertility. Initially, clinical, laboratory, and genital ultrasounds were normal, but the serum PRL was 10,074 μIU/mL (n.v.: 127−637 μIU/mL), the PEG fraction was 71% (laboratory cut-off > 60%), and luteinizing hormone (LH) was significantly lower. An MRI revealed a pituitary tumor of 12.8/10 mm with a subacute intratumoral hemorrhage. DA was initiated, and menstrual bleeding reappeared with a reduction in the tumor’s volume to 1.9/2.2 mm at 12 months. Two years later, the patient renounced DA and follow-ups. After another 2 years, she became spontaneously pregnant. Serum PRL was 18,325 μIU/mL, and an MRI revealed a microprolactinoma of 2.1/2 mm. The patient gave birth to a normal baby at term, and she breastfed for six months, after which she asked for ablactation, and DA was administered. This case highlights the possibility of the occurrence of a normal pregnancy during a long period of amenorrhea induced by a microprolactinoma with a high level of serum PRL, even if DA fails to correct infertility. There was no compulsory relationship between the tumoral volume’s evolution and the evolution of its lactophore activity. The hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism induced by high PRL was mainly manifested by low LH, and in this situation, normal levels of FSH and estradiol do not always induce follicle recruitment and development without abnormalities in the ovary ultrasound.

Outcome of Dopamine Agonist Therapy Withdrawal in Children with Prolactinomas

BACKGROUND

Prolactinomas are rare in children and adolescents. As in adults, dopamine agonists (DAs) are the treatment of choice in the majority of patients. However, at what point children should be taken off of therapy and what the recurrence risk of hyperprolactinemia is following treatment withdrawal is not well described.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to systematically review our experience with DA treatment withdrawal in children and adolescents with prolactinomas.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients followed for prolactinomas during the last 12 years was conducted. Variables analyzed included age, gender, initial serum prolactin levels, tumor characteristics, cabergoline dose, and results of treatment withdrawal. Clinical characteristics of patients who met eligibility criteria for DA withdrawal were compared with those who did not. Patients who underwent surgery were excluded.

RESULTS

Of 47 patients identified, 42 were included in the study. Of those, DA withdrawal was attempted in 13 (31%) and was initially successful in 3 (21%). Patients who did not meet eligibility criteria for treatment withdrawal had higher baseline prolactin levels (p = 0.018) as well as larger (p = 0.03) and more invasive (p = 0.002) tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

Less than half of our patients were eligible for DA treatment withdrawal and less than one-fourth achieved remission of hyperprolactinemia following cessation of therapy. This suggests that the overall recurrence rate of prolactinomas in pediatric patients may be higher than has been reported in adults.

The side effects of dopamine receptor agonist drugs in Chinese prolactinoma patients: a cross sectional study

BACKGROUND

Recently, side effects from Dopamine Receptor Agonist Drugs (DAs) in treating pituitary prolactinoma have raised widespread concern. This study explores the incidence and influencing factors of DAs-related side effects in Chinese prolactinoma patients.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted. 51 prolactinoma patients treated with DAs, 12 prolactinoma or pituitary microadenoma patients without DAs treatment, and 33 healthy controls were included. The Barratt impulsivity scale-11, Patient Health Questionnaire 9, and the ICD screening questionnaire were all used to evaluate the psychological and physical side effects of DAs. Clinical data of all subjects were collected from their electronic medical records.

RESULTS

The incidence of ICDs in the treated group, the untreated group, and control group was 9.8% (5/51), 16.7% (2/12), and 9.1% (3/33), respectively. In the treated group in particular, there were 1 patient (2%, 1/51), 2 patients (3.9%, 2/51), and 2 patients (3.9%, 2/51) with positive screening for punding, compulsive shopping, and hypersexuality, respectively. In terms of depression, the incidence of "minimal", "mild" and "moderate" depression in the treated group was 62.8% (32/51), 25.5% (13/51), and 5.9% (3/51), respectively. The incidence of physical symptoms was 51.0% (26/51) in the treated group and gastrointestinal symptoms were the most common symptoms (33.3%, 17/51). In addition, we found that the various parameters of DAs treatment had no association with the occurrence of physical symptoms or ICDs (all P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Chinese prolactinoma patients treated with DAs had a lower incidence of ICDs (9.8%), while gastrointestinal symptoms were common. In this way, more attention should be paid to side effects, especially physical symptoms, in Chinese prolactinoma patients with DAs therapy during follow-up regardless of dose.

Aggressive prolactinoma (Review)

Aggressive prolactinoma (APRL) is a subgroup of aggressive pituitary tumors (accounting for 10% of all hypophyseal neoplasia) which are defined by: invasion based on radiological and/or histological features, a higher proliferation profile when compared to typical adenomas and rapidly developing resistance to standard medication/protocols in addition to an increased risk of early recurrence. This is a narrative review focusing on APRL in terms of both presentation and management. Upon admission, the suggestive features may include increased serum prolactin with a large tumor diameter (mainly >4 cm), male sex, early age at diagnosis (<20 years), and genetic predisposition [multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1), aryl hydrocarbon receptor interacting protein (AIP), succinate dehydrogenase (SDHx) gene mutations]. Potential prognostic factors are indicated by assessment of E-cadherin, matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) status. Furthermore, during management, APRL may be associated with dopamine agonist (DA) resistance (described in 10-20% of all prolactinomas), post-hypophysectomy relapse, mitotic count >2, Ki-67 proliferation index ≥3%, the need for radiotherapy, lack of response in terms of controlling prolactin levels and tumor growth despite multimodal therapy. However, none of these as an isolated element serves as a surrogate of APRL diagnosis. A fourth-line therapy is necessary with temozolomide, an oral alkylating chemotherapeutic agent, that may induce tumor reduction and serum prolactin reduction in 75% of cases but only 8% have a normalization of prolactin levels. Controversies surrounding the duration of therapy still exist; also regarding the fifth-line therapy, post-temozolomide intervention. Recent data suggest alternatives such as somatostatin analogues (pasireotide), checkpoint inhibitors (ipilimumab, nivolumab), tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (lapatinib), and mTOR inhibitors (everolimus). APRL represents a complex condition that is still challenging, and multimodal therapy is essential.

Outcomes of transsphenoidal surgery in dopamine agonist-resistant prolactinomas: a retrospective study

PURPOSE

Dopamine agonists (DA) comprise first-line treatment for prolactinomas. However, some patients show no response to DA and are considered resistant. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of DA-resistant prolactinoma patients after transsphenoidal surgery (TSS).

METHODS

A total of 94 consecutive patients with DA-resistant prolactinomas who underwent TSS were retrospectively enrolled in the present study. Early postoperative remission rate, prolactin (PRL) levels, and recurrence rate were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 94 DA-resistant patients, 47 (50%) achieved early remission 1 week post-surgery, including 41.18% of macroprolactinoma patients and 73.08% of microprolactinoma patients. PRL levels on the first postoperative day were significantly lower than preoperative PRL levels (p < 0.001). Total resection rate in macro- and microprolactinomas were, respectively, 75 and 96.15%. A recurrence of hyperprolactinemia and tumor was, respectively, found in 31.91 and 19.15% of patients with a follow-up of 39.53 ± 2.172 months (range 3-86). A higher hyperprolactinemia recurrence was observed in patients with invasive prolactinomas (p = 0.021) or preoperative PRL levels ≥ 200 ng/ml (p = 0.029). Univariate logistic regression indicated that larger maximum tumor diameter (p = 0.045), invasive prolactinomas (p = 0.002), and absence of early postoperative remission (p = 0.004) were significant predictors of tumor recurrence. However, using multivariate stepwise logistic regression, only invasiveness and early postoperative remission remained significant.

CONCLUSION

Tumor invasiveness and preoperative PRL levels were significant predictors of hyperprolactinemia recurrence after TSS. For tumor recurrence, invasiveness and early postoperative remission were independent predictors.

Prolactinomas

Hyperprolactinemia, defined by a level of serum prolactin above the standard upper limit of normal range, is a common finding in clinical practice and prolactinomas are the main pathological cause. Prolactinomas lead to signs and symptoms of hormone oversecretion, such as galactorrhea and hypogonadism, as well as symptoms of mass effect, including visual impairment, headaches and intracranial hypertension. Diagnosis involves prolactin measurement and sellar imaging, but several pitfalls are involved in this evaluation, which may difficult the proper management. Treatment is medical in the majority of cases, consisting of dopamine agonists, which present high response rates, with a very favorable safety profile. Major adverse effects that should be monitored consist of cardiac valvulopathy and impulse control disorders. Other treatment options include surgery and radiotherapy. Temozolomide may be used for aggressive or malignant carcinomas. Finally, pregnancy outcomes are similar to general population even when dopamine agonist treatment is maintained.

Biochemical Remission after Cabergoline Withdrawal in Hyperprolactinemic Patients with Visible Remnant Pituitary Adenoma

CONTEXT

Dopamine agonists (DAs) are the first-line therapy for prolactinomas. Although pituitary tumors often do not completely disappear, discontinuing DAs in patients with no visible tumor on magnetic resonance imaging is advised.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze biochemical remission after cabergoline (CAB) withdrawal in patients with visible remnant pituitary tumors.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Severance Hospital.

SUBJECTS

We identified 734 patients with prolactinomas undergoing CAB therapy for at least 12 months from 2005 to 2018. We selected 44 patients with prolactinomas who discontinued CAB with normal prolactin levels; they were receiving a minimal CAB dose but had visible remnant tumors.

RESULTS

Median age at diagnosis was 32 (18-58) years, and most patients were women (95.45%). Median treatment duration was 32 (12-120) months. Of 44 patients, 33 continued to have normoprolactinemia, but 11 patients developed hyperprolactinemia after drug withdrawal within 26 (12-97) months. Age, sex, maximal and remnant tumor size, and treatment duration were similar between the groups. The initial prolactin level and chances of cavernous sinus (CS) invasion were higher in the recurrence group. CS invasion at diagnosis was associated with an increased recurrence rate. Although treatment response did not correlate with the initial and final signal intensity assessments, a significant decrease in T2 intensity ratio after 6 months of CAB therapy was observed in the remission group (P = .043).

CONCLUSION

In patients with visible tumors, the presence of CS invasion at diagnosis may be an unfavorable predictor for biochemical remission after CAB discontinuation.

High biochemical recurrence rate after withdrawal of cabergoline in prolactinomas: is it necessary to restart treatment?

PURPOSE

Treatment with dopamine agonists (DA) is highly effective in patients with prolactinomas. In selected patients, discontinuation of DA after several years of successful treatment is possible, however, hyperprolactinemia recurs in 60-80% of them. It is unclear what is the clinical significance of these recurrences and hence, whether or not reinitiation of therapy is necessary.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the recurrence rate in prolactinoma patients after DA withdrawal and the necessity to restart treatment.

METHODS

Patients with >2 years of treatment with cabergoline (CBG) who achieved normoprolactinemia and a > 50% reduction in tumor size were included. DA dose was down titrated until withdrawal. Basal tumor size, as well as PRL and gonadal steroid levels were recorded at diagnosis, at withdrawal of DA and every 3-6 months for 1-3 years.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were included (38 women, 34 macroprolactinomas). After withdrawal, 34 (68%) presented recurrence of hyperprolactinemia. PRL levels <5 ng/mL at the time of withdrawal predicted remission (sensitivity 76%, specificity of 63%). CBG was restarted in eight patients (23%) because of the presence of hypogonadism. CBG was withheld in the remaining 26, based on the following arguments: (1) premenopausal women without biochemical hypogonadism, (54%); (2) asymptomatic men under 65 without biochemical hypogonadism (19%); (3) asymptomatic postmenopausal women (19%); (4) asymptomatic men over 65 (8%). After a median follow-up of 30 months, no increase in PRL levels or tumor growth was documented.

CONCLUSIONS

Biochemical recurrence in prolactinomas is very frequent, however, in only a few of these patients reinitiation of DA is necessary.

A single- center experience of prolactin-producing pituitary adenomas without hyperprolactinemia: Its incidence and clinical management

OBJECTIVE

This study clarifies the incidence of prolactin-producing pituitary adenomas without hyperprolactinemia and determines the appropriate treatment strategy for these tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective analysis focused on prolactin-producing adenomas without hyperprolactinemia, which were initially treated by surgery as nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas. Among 942 patients with histologically confirmed pituitary adenoma, 114 (12.1 %) patients, consisting of 68 men and 46 women, who had prolactin-producing adenomas without hyperprolactinemia were identified between April 2005 and March 2019.

RESULTS

Of the 114 patients identified, 13 (11.4 %) had prolactin mono-expressions, 18 (15.8 %) had pit-1 lineage hormonal expressions, and 83 (72.8 %) had paradoxical immunoexpression out of the pituitary differentiation lineage, including prolactin. During the follow-up period, 19 patients suffered tumor progression, and 14 required salvage treatment. Of the 19 patients, 11 underwent gamma knife radiosurgery, and none of them experienced further tumor progression. Cabergoline was administered of them to six patients, and one achieved tumor shrinkage. However, the remaining five patients who were treated with cabergoline suffered further tumor progression and required another salvage treatment. Among the patients in the prolactin mono-expression group, one experienced tumor regrowth and underwent gamma knife radiosurgery. In the pit-1 lineage group, two patients experienced tumor regrowth. One had further tumor progression after treatment with cabergoline and underwent gamma knife radiosurgery. Among the patients in the paradoxical immunoexpression group, 16 suffered tumor progression. Four patients underwent further surgery, seven patients were treated with gamma knife radiosurgery, and one patient received fractionated irradiation. None of the eight patients who were treated with gamma knife radiosurgery and fractionated irradiation showed further tumor progression. Four patients in this group were treated with cabergoline, but they all suffered further tumor progression and underwent additional salvage treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Out of the pituitary differentiation lineage, paradoxical hormonal expression occurred in three-quarters of the patients identified. Further surgery or gamma knife radiosurgery should be given priority in times of tumor progression because most patients were resistant to dopamine agonists.

Prolactinomas: Prognostic Factors of Early Remission After Transsphenoidal Surgery

Background and Objective: Most patients with prolactinomas receive pharmacological treatment only, resulting in limited research on the predictors of successful prolactinoma surgery. In this study, we analyzed whether early postoperative serum prolactin concentrations and selected tumor characteristics could predict early, hormonal remission after removal of prolactinomas. Methods: We prospectively enrolled 48 consecutive patients with prolactinomas who underwent transsphenoidal resection performed by the same surgeon. Early remission, defined as a lack of hyperprolactinemia symptoms and normalization of serum prolactin concentration, was ascertained in all patients at 3 months. We evaluated the invasiveness of prolactinomas on the Knosp grading scale and measured serum prolactin concentrations on the first postoperative day. Routine immunohistochemical analysis, evaluation for plurihormonality, and assessment of the Ki-67 proliferation index (<3 or ≥3% of positive nuclei) were performed in all tumor samples. Results: Of 48 patients, 38 (79%) achieved early biochemical remission at 3 months. Patients in early remission at 3 months had lower serum prolactin concentrations on the first postoperative day than patients with recurrent or persistent hyperprolactinemia (p < 0.001). Using univariate logistic regression, larger maximum tumor diameter (p = 0.014), higher Knosp grade (p < 0.001), and plurihormonality predicted remission at 3 months (p = 0.021). However, using multivariate stepwise logistic regression, only the Knosp grade remained significant (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Radiological assessment of prolactinoma invasiveness (Knosp grades) and early postoperative serum prolactin concentrations are important predictors of early remission following transsphenoidal prolactinoma resection.