Possible mechanisms of drug-induced aspirin and clopidogrel resistance

Prevalence and predictors of potential drug-drug interactions in patients of internal medicine wards of a tertiary care hospital in India

Background

Drug-drug interactions are a major source of adverse drug events (ADEs). Polypharmacy, age and the number of comorbid conditions are important predictors of adverse drug interactions. ADEs account for up to 5% of hospital admissions per year and an increase in the length of hospital stay.

Objective

To find the prevalence and predictors of potential drug-drug interactions (pDDIs) in patients admitted to the wards of an internal medicine department of a tertiary care hospital.

Method

Patients admitted to internal medicine wards with prescriptions having more than one drug were selected. Demographic details including age, gender, number of comorbid conditions, number of drugs prescribed and the disease for which the patient was admitted were recorded in a case record form. Interactions were checked using Micromedex DrugReax software.

Results

A total of 939 patients were recruited for this study based on inclusion criteria. 433 prescriptions (46%) had one or more pDDIs, with a range of 1-13 drug interactions per prescription. A total of 1395 drug interactions were found, with 866 moderate drug interactions (62%), 435 major interactions (31.1%) and 89 minor interactions (6.3%). During the study period only three contraindicated drug combinations (0.2%) were recorded. A significant association (p<0.01) was found between the number of pDDIs and predictors, age and number of drugs.

Conclusion

A total of 433 prescriptions (46%) had one or more pDDIs. Older patients and those prescribed >6 drugs are at major risk for occurrence of pDDIs. Moderate severity interactions were the highest number followed by major severity interactions.

Acetylsalicylic Acid Resistance After Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

The most common conditions leading to death after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantations (SPKs) are cardiovascular diseases. The aim of this study was to test the platelet aggregation inhibitor acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) resistance in patients after SPKs, including investigations into the triggering factors.

METHODS

Thirty-two patients (22 men, 10 women; overall age, 47.4 ± 8.6 years) were involved in our study and took 100 mg ASA per day. We used optical platelet aggregometry to detect resistance.

RESULTS

Resistance occurred in 40.6% of the study group. However, with the use of logistic regression analysis, the examined 24 factors did not show any significant correspondence with resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of ASA resistance seems to be higher compared with other groups, but the triggering effect is still unproved. Clarifying this question should be important regarding the mortality- and morbidity-reducing capacity of antiplatelet drugs in the management of cardiovascular conditions.

Hydrogen Sulfide and Platelets: A Possible Role in Thrombosis

Platelets are circulating blood elements with key roles in haemostasis and thrombosis. Platelets are activated by a range of stimuli including exposed subendothelial components. Haemostasis also depends upon the effects of inhibitory substances, including the gasotransmitter nitric oxide whose effects on platelets are well documented. Evidence is also emerging to suggest that H2S is generated enzymatically by platelets and can impact their function. Exposure of platelets to H2S from slow-release compounds inhibits aggregation and exerted anti-thrombotic effects in vivo. The mechanisms by which H2S impacts platelet function and the importance of interactions between H2S and other gasotransmitters remain unclear. H2S is therefore emerging as a potentially important regulator of platelet activation and thrombosis. Further study is required to evaluate its importance as a regulator of platelet physiology and associated pathological conditions such as myocardial infarction and stroke.

Mechanisms of aspirin resistance

Aspirin is integral to the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease and acts to impair the development of platelet-mediated atherothromboembolic events by irreversible inhibition of platelet cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1). Inhibition of this enzyme prevents the synthesis of the potent pro-aggregatory prostanoid thromboxane A2. A large number of patients continue to experience atherothromboembolic events despite aspirin therapy, so-called 'aspirin treatment failure', and this is multifactorial in aetiology. Approximately 10% however do not respond appropriately to aspirin in a phenomenon known as 'aspirin resistance', which is defined by various laboratory techniques. In this review we discuss the reasons for aspirin resistance in a systematic manner, starting from prescription of the drug and ending at the level of the platelet. Poor medication adherence has been shown to be a cause of apparent aspirin resistance, and may in fact be the largest contributory factor. Also important is high platelet turnover due to underlying inflammatory processes, such as atherosclerosis and its complications, leading to faster regeneration of platelets, and hence of COX-1, at a rate that diminishes the efficacy of once daily dosing. Recent developments include the identification of platelet glycoprotein IIIa as a potential biomarker (as well as possible underlying mechanism) for aspirin resistance and the discovery of an anion efflux pump that expels intracellular aspirin from platelets. The absolute as well as relative contributions of such factors to the phenomenon of aspirin resistance are the subject of continuing research.

Comparison of effects of two different formulations of clopidogrel bisulfate tablets on platelet aggregation and bleeding time in healthy Korean volunteers: A single-dose, randomized, open-label, 1-week, two-period, phase IV crossover study

BACKGROUND

Clopidogel bisulfate, an oral antiplatelet agent that works by inhibiting adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation, is used in the treatment of coronary artery disease, peripheral vascular disease, and cerebrovascular disease. The newly developed generic version of Clopidogrel bisulfate has a mechanism of action comparable to the reference formulation.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess and compare the pharmacodynamic effects and safety profile of these 2 formulations of Clopidogrel bisulfate in healthy volunteers.

METHODS

This was a single-dose, randomized, openlabel, 1-week, 2-period, Phase IV crossover study conducted from July 2008 to February 2009. Healthy volunteers were randomly assigned to receive a 1-week course of the test formulation followed by a 1-week course of the reference formulation (each, 300 mg on day 1, then 75 mg for 6 days), or the reverse sequence, separated by a 2-week washout period. Inhibition of platelet aggregation and the effect on bleeding time were used to evaluate pharmacodynamic effects. Variables included the mean maximal activity (E(max)) of the percent inhibition of platelet aggregation and bleeding time. Blood was sampled at screening, on the morning before each first drug administration (days 1 and 21), the day after the completion of each 7-day treatment course (days 8 and 28), and 7 days after completion of each 7-day treatment course (days 14 and 34). The bioequivalence of the 2 pharmaceutical formulations was tested. The safety profiles included assessment of vital signs, laboratory test results, and the incidence of adverse events and adverse drug reactions.

RESULTS

Two of the original 32 healthy Korean volunteers were excluded because of screening failure or withdrawal of consent. Therefore, 30 volunteers (16 males; mean [SD] age, 28.6 [8.0] years; age range, 19-51 years; mean weight, 62.4 [9.5] kg; weight range, 45-78 kg) were recruited into the study. E(max) and bleeding time did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. The mean change in E(max) was 44.1% (22.5%) and 44.3% (24.2%) and the mean change in bleeding time was 4.8 (3.7) and 4.6 (3.8) minutes after 7 days' administration of the test formulation and the reference formulation, respectively. The geometric mean ratio (90% CI) was 99.5 (82.9-116.2) and was within the bioequivalence acceptance range of 80% to 120%. Vital signs and platelet and neutrophil counts were within normal limits. None of the volunteers experienced any adverse events or adverse drug reactions.

CONCLUSION

In this study of healthy volunteers, there were no significant differences between the 2 tablet formulations of Clopidogrel bisulfate in pharmacodynamic effects or safety profile.

Antiplatelet resistance in stroke

Although the exact prevalence of antiplatelet resistance in ischemic stroke is not known, estimates about the two most widely used antiplatelet agents - aspirin and clopidogrel - suggest that the resistance rate is high, irrespective of the definition used and parameters measured. Inadequate antiplatelet responsiveness correlates with an increased risk of recurrent ischemic vascular events in patients with stroke and acute coronary syndrome. It is not currently known whether tailoring antiplatelet therapy based on platelet function test results translates into a more effective strategy to prevent secondary vascular events after stroke. Large-scale clinical trials using a universally accepted definition and standardized measurement techniques for antiplatelet resistance are needed to demonstrate whether a 'platelet-function test-guided antiplatelet treatment' strategy translates into improved stroke care. This article gives an overview of the clinical importance of laboratory antiplatelet resistance, describes the challenges for platelet-function test-guided antiplatelet treatment and discusses practical issues about the management of patients with aspirin and/or clopidogrel resistance.

Measurement of antiplatelet inhibition during neurointerventional procedures: the effect of antithrombotic duration and loading dose

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

Symptomatic thromboembolic events are the most common complications associated with aneurysm coiling, and carotid and intracranial stenting. Our objective is to assess the effect of aspirin (ASA) and clopidogrel dose and duration on platelet inhibition using a point of care assay in neurointerventional (NI) suite.

METHOD

The dose, duration, and point of care platelet function assay data for clopidogrel and aspirin therapy were prospectively collected between February 2006 and November 2007. Inadequate platelet inhibition for ASA was defined as >or=550 ASA reaction units (ARU), and for clopidogrel was defined as <or=50% inhibition of the P2Y12/ADP receptor

RESULTS

We collected data from 216 consecutive patients. Inadequate platelet inhibition was noted in 13% of patients on aspirin and 66% of patients on clopidogrel (P-value < .0001). Patients taking clopidogrel 75 mg for >or=7 days, 300 mg for 24 hours, and 600 mg same day load had a mean P2Y12/ADP inhibition of 45%, 35% (P-value = .09), and 16%, respectively (P-value = .005).

CONCLUSION

Premedication with clopidogrel, in contrast to aspirin, does not achieve adequate platelet inhibition in about two-third of the patients. Same day antiplatelet loading may be insufficient to achieve adequate platelet inhibition and should be avoided if clinically feasible.

Antiplatelet therapy in percutaneous coronary intervention: a critical review of the 2007 AHA/ACC/SCAI guidelines and beyond

Antiplatelet therapy is a mainstay in the treatment of patients who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Although the 2007 PCI treatment guidelines were published by the American College of Cardiology, the American Heart Association, and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, new clinical evidence has emerged, expanding our understanding of antiplatelet use and potentially affecting the treatment guidelines. For example, clinical trial results prompted a Science Advisory to recommend that dual therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel be used for longer periods-up to 1 year in patients who receive bare metal stents and at least 1 year in patients receiving drug-eluting stents. New trial results have also emerged regarding the use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists such as abciximab, eptifibatide, and tirofiban. This article reviews the current recommendations for antiplatelet therapy in PCI patients, recent trial results, newly developed agents, ongoing clinical trials, and the future direction of antiplatelet therapy in patients who undergo PCI.

Bioequivalence and tolerability of two clopidogrel salt preparations, besylate and bisulfate: a randomized, open-label, crossover study in healthy Korean male subjects

BACKGROUND

Clopidogrel, a potent antiplatelet agent, reduces the risk for thrombotic events in patients with atherothrombotic diseases. Clopidogrel is marketed primarily as a bisulfate salt. A different salt preparation of clopidogrel, clopidogrel besylate, has been developed and might provide an additional treatment option for patients.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and tolerability profiles of clopidogrel besylate with those of clopidogrel bisulfate to determine bioequivalence for the purposes of marketing approval.

METHODS

A randomized, open-label, 2-period, single- and multiple-dose, comparative crossover study was conducted in healthy Korean male subjects. The subjects received either clopidogrel bisulfate or clopidogrel besylate as a single 300-mg oral loading dose (day 1) followed by a 75-mg/d (once daily) maintenance dose on days 2 to 6. After a 15-day washout period, subjects were administered the alternative salt preparation according to the same protocol. The plasma concentrations of clopidogrel and its primary metabolite (SR26334) were assessed using high-performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry after administration of the loading dose. The platelet aggregation response to 10-mumol/L adenosine diphosphate was measured using turbidometric aggregometry during the single- and multiple-dosing periods and at steady state (day 6). Tolerability was monitored using physical examination, including vital sign measurements, and laboratory analysis.

RESULTS

Forty-four subjects were enrolled and completed the study (mean [SD] age, 24.3 [2.7] years; weight, 70.0 [8.2] kg). The mean values for C(max), T(max), and AUC(0-t) with clopidogrel (parent drug) of clopidogrel besylate (5.2 ng/mL, 0.9 hour, and 10.1 ng/mL/h, respectively) were similar to those with clopidogrel bisulfate (5.4 ng/mL, 0.9 hour, and 10.3 ng/mL/h). The mean values for Cmax, AUC(0-t), and AUC(0-infinity) with the SR26334 of clopidogrel besylate (10.9 microg/mL, 38.8 microg/mL/h, and 43.0 microg/mL/h, respectively) were not significantly different from those with the SR26334 of clopidogrel bisulfate (11.9 microg/mL, 40.6 microg/mL/h, and 43.8 microg/mL/h). The mean values for maximal antiplatelet effect (Emax) and area under the time-effect curve (AUEC) with the 2 clopidogrel salt preparations were as follows: clopidogrel besylate, 58.8 h . % and 4299.1 h . % inhibition, respectively; and clopidogrel bisulfate, 61.7 h . % and 4406.9 h . % inhibition; these differences were not statistically significant. The 90% CIs for the ratios of the log-transformed C(max), AUC, E(max), and AUEC values were within the predetermined bioequivalence range of 80% to 125%. Three adverse events (6.8%) were reported during the study and included abdominal discomfort (1 subject [2.3%] in the group that received clopidogrel bisulfate), easy fatigability (1 subject [2.3%] immediately before administration of loading dose of clopidogrel besylate), and thrombocytopenia (1 subject [2.3%] in the group receiving the clopidogrel bisulfate). All adverse events were transient and mild.

CONCLUSIONS

In these healthy Korean male subjects, the differences in the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties between the 2 clopidogrel salt preparations did not reach statistical significance and met the regulatory requirements for bioequivalence. Both preparations were well tolerated.

Variability in platelet response to the antiplatelet agents aspirin and clopidogrel: mechanisms, measurement, and clinical relevance

Platelet reactivity (eg, platelet adhesion, activation, aggregation) is the underlying pathology for atherothrombotic processes and subsequent ischemic complications. Antiplatelet drugs, including aspirin, dipyridamole, thienopyridines (clopidogrel and ticlopidine), and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists, have proven efficacy in atherothrombotic event prevention. However, variability of platelet response measured in the laboratory has been reported and is a subject of keen interest.It is unclear to what extent variability of platelet response to antiplatelet agents is associated with clinical outcomes. A better understanding of this issue requires a general consensus for a standard, preferably point-of-care, ex vivo or in vitro assay to determine the effects of antiplatelet agents on key platelet functions. Currently, results using various methods have not yielded an obvious answer. Small-scale studies have examined the correlation between ex vivo inhibition of platelet aggregation or residual platelet activity and clinical endpoints, and although evidence shows that such correlations may exist, results have not been consistent or definitive. Data from large-scale prospective trials are needed to expand our current understanding of the benefits and limitations of utilizing platelet function tests to effectively manage the balance between protection and risks associated with the antiplatelet therapies, aspirin, and clopidogrel.

Aspirin resistance: disparities and clinical implications

Abstract Aspirin is one of the most widely prescribed drugs for the prevention of thrombosis in patients with vascular disease. Yet, aspirin is unable to prevent thrombosis in all patients. The term "aspirin resistance" has been used to broadly define the failure of aspirin to prevent a thrombotic event. Whether this is directly related to aspirin itself through biochemical aspirin resistance or treatment failure, or if it is because of aspirin's inability to overcome the thrombogenic aspects of the disease process itself, has not been elucidated. This can have dramatic clinical implications for a variety of vascular disease subsets and is cause for concern, considering the high prevalence of aspirin use for both primary and secondary prevention. Disparities exist in the rates of aspirin resistance among certain patient populations, such as women, patients with diabetes mellitus, and those with heart failure, and across clinical conditions, such as cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. Clinical trial data from studies observing resistance have revealed that regardless of study size, dose of aspirin, control for drug interactions and adherence, or assay used to measure platelet function, aspirin resistance is associated with an increased risk for adverse events. Although the evidence is mounting, there has yet to be a consensus on the appropriate clinical response to aspirin resistance.

Comparative inhibitory activity of etoricoxib, celecoxib, and diclofenac on COX-2 versus COX-1 in healthy subjects

We determined cyclo-oxygenase-1 and cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibition in healthy middle-aged subjects (41-65 years) randomly assigned to four 7-day treatment sequences of etoricoxib 90 mg every day, celecoxib 200 mg twice a day, diclofenac 75 mg twice a day, or placebo in a double-blind, randomized, 4-period crossover study. Maximum inhibition of thromboxane B(2) (cyclo-oxygenase-1 activity) in clotting whole blood on day 7 (0-24 hours postdose) was the primary endpoint. Inhibition of lipopolysaccharide-induced prostaglandin E(2) in whole blood (cyclo-oxygenase-2 activity) was assessed on day 7 (0-24 hours postdose) as a secondary endpoint. Diclofenac had significantly greater maximum inhibition of thromboxane B(2) versus each comparator (P < .001); placebo 2.4% (95% confidence interval: -8.7% to 12.3%), diclofenac 92.2% (91.4% to 92.9%), etoricoxib 15.5% (6.6% to 23.5%), and celecoxib 20.2% (11.5% to 28.1%). Prostaglandin E(2) synthesis was inhibited with a rank order of potency of diclofenac > etoricoxib > celecoxib. In summary, at doses commonly used in rheumatoid arthritis, diclofenac significantly inhibits both cyclo-oxygenase-1 and cyclo-oxygenase-2, whereas etoricoxib and celecoxib significantly inhibit cyclo-oxygenase-2 and do not substantially inhibit cyclo-oxygenase-1.

The effect of CYP2C19 polymorphism on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of clopidogrel: a possible mechanism for clopidogrel resistance

We evaluated the effect of the CYP2C19 genotype on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamcis of clopidogrel. Twenty-four subjects were divided into three groups on the basis of their CYP2C19 genotype: homozygous extensive metabolizers (homoEMs, n = 8), heterozygous EMs (heteroEMs, n = 8), and poor metabolizers (PMs, n = 8). After a single 300-mg loading dose of clopidogrel on day 1, followed by a 75-mg daily maintenance dose from days 2 to 7, we measured the plasma levels of clopidogrel and assessed the antiplatelet effect as pharmacodynamics. The mean clopidogrel area under the curve (AUC) for PMs was 1.8- and 2.9-fold higher than that for heteroEMs and homoEMs, respectively (P = 0.013). The mean peak plasma concentration in PMs was 1.8- and 4.7-fold higher than that of heteroEMs and homoEMs, respectively (P = 0.008). PMs exhibited a significantly lower antiplatelet effect than heteroEMs or homoEMs (P < 0.001). From these findings it is clear that the CYP2C19 genotype affects the plasma levels of clopidogrel and modulates the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel.

The antiplatelet effect of atorvastatin in patients with acute coronary syndrome depends on the hs-CRP level

BACKGROUND

In data we published earlier, there is a correlation between platelet aggregation in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who are receiving aspirin and elevated hsCRP-level. We suggested that antiplatelet action of statins, which are known to lower hsCRP-levels, could be especially pronounced in patients with high levels of hsCRP.

METHODS AND RESULTS

54 patients with ACS without ST-segment elevation were included in this study. All patients received aspirin 160-325 mg daily. In addition to aspirin, some patients received atorvastatin 40-80 mg/d (n=19) or 300 mg of clopidogrel followed by 75 mg/d (n=15). HsCRP-levels and ADP-induced platelet aggregation were assessed on the first and on the eight days of treatment. Patients were divided into subgroups according to initial hsCRP-levels and treatment. In atorvastatin/high-CRP subgroup, the level of aggregation was about three times lower after eight days than it was on the first day. In contrast, in atorvastatin/low-CRP subgroup the level of platelet aggregation did not change during the same period. The effect of clopidogrel did not depend on hsCRP-level. In control group (patients treated with aspirin alone), platelet aggregation did not change with time.

CONCLUSION

There is a correlation between antiplatelet effect of atorvastatin and initial hsCRP-level. The antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel does not depend on hsCRP-level.