Isolated calf deep vein thrombosis in the community setting: the Worcester Venous Thromboembolism study

Hospitalized patients with isolated distal deep vein thrombosis: anticoagulation therapy or not?

Background

Isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (IDDVT), a disease frequently detected in hospitalized patients, can progress to proximal deep vein thrombosis (PDVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). Here, we evaluated the effects of anticoagulation in hospitalized IDDVT patients.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study in our hospital and enrolled hospitalized IDDVT patients diagnosed by compression ultrasonography (CUS) from January to December 2020. Participants were divided into anticoagulation (AC) and non-anticoagulation (non-AC) groups. After propensity score matching (PSM), multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to assess whether anticoagulation was associated with PDVT/PE, and all-cause mortality.

Results

A total of 426 IDDVT inpatients with CUS follow-up were screened from 1502 distal DVT patients and finally enrolled. The median age was 67 years with 51.4% males and 15.5% cancer patients. The median follow-up was 11.6 months. There were 288 and 138 patients treated with or without anticoagulants, respectively. Patients in the non-AC group had less body mass index and more comorbidities. Patients in the AC group were treated with rivaroxaban or dabigatran (52.1%), low molecular weight heparin (42.7%), and warfarin (5.2%). The PSM generated 111 pairs of well-matched IDDVT patients with or without anticoagulation. The Kaplan–Meier analysis demonstrated that neither the incidence of PDVT/PE (5.4% vs. 2.7%, log-rank p = 0.313) nor all-cause mortality (27.9% vs. 18.9%, log-rank p = 0.098) was significant different between groups. Anticoagulation was not associated with PDVT/PE and all-cause mortality in the multivariable Cox regression analyses using the matched cohorts. The main risk factors for all-cause mortality were age, malignancy history, BMI, sepsis, heart failure, and white blood cell (WBC) count.

Conclusions

In hospitalized IDDVT patients, the thrombosis extension rate to PDVT/PE was low. Anticoagulation did not reduce the incidence of thrombosis extension of IDDVT and was not associated with all-cause mortality.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12959-022-00410-1.

Clinical Presentation and Short- and Long-term Outcomes in Patients With Isolated Distal Deep Vein Thrombosis vs Proximal Deep Vein Thrombosis in the RIETE Registry

Importance

Insufficient data exist about the clinical presentation, short-term, and long-term outcomes of patients with isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (IDDVT), that is, thrombosis in infrapopliteal veins without proximal extension or pulmonary embolism (PE).

Objective

To determine the clinical characteristics, short-term, and 1-year outcomes in patients with IDDVT and to compare the outcomes in unadjusted and multivariable adjusted analyses with patients who had proximal DVT.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This was a multicenter, international cohort study in participating sites of the Registro Informatizado Enfermedad Tromboembólica (RIETE) registry conducted from March 1, 2001, through February 28, 2021. Patients included in this study had IDDVT. Patients with proximal DVT were identified for comparison. Patients were excluded if they had a history of asymptomatic DVT, upper-extremity DVT, coexisting PE, or COVID-19 infection.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Primary outcomes were 90-day and 1-year mortality, 1-year major bleeding, and 1-year venous thromboembolism (VTE) deterioration, which was defined as subsequent development of proximal DVT or PE.

Results

A total of 33 897 patients were identified with isolated DVT (without concomitant PE); 5938 (17.5%) had IDDVT (mean [SD] age, 61 [17] years; 2975 male patients [50.1%]), and 27 959 (82.5%) had proximal DVT (mean [SD] age, 65 [18] years; 14 315 male patients [51.2%]). Compared with individuals with proximal DVT, those with IDDVT had a lower comorbidity burden but were more likely to have had recent surgery or to have received hormonal therapy. Patients with IDDVT had lower risk of 90-day mortality compared with those with proximal DVT (odds ratio [OR], 0.47; 95% CI, 0.40-0.55). Findings were similar in 1-year unadjusted analyses (hazard ratio [HR], 0.52; 95% CI, 0.46-0.59) and adjusted analyses (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.64-0.82). Patients with IDDVT had a lower 1-year hazard of VTE deterioration (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.69-0.99). In 1-year adjusted analyses of patients without an adverse event within the first 3 months, IDDVT was associated with lower risk of VTE deterioration (adjusted HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.24-0.97). By 1-year follow-up, symptoms or signs of postthrombotic syndrome were less common in patients with IDDVT (47.6% vs 60.5%).

Conclusions and Relevance

Results of this cohort study suggest that patients with IDDVT had a less ominous prognosis compared with patients with proximal DVT. Such differences were likely multifactorial, including the differences in demographics, risk factors, comorbidities, particularly for all-cause mortality, and a potential association of thrombus location with VTE deterioration and postthrombotic syndrome. Randomized clinical trials are needed to assess the optimal long-term management of IDDVT.

Characteristics and Treatment Strategy of Isolated Calf Deep Venous Thrombosis after Fractures: A Review of Recent Literature

Isolated calf deep venous thrombosis (ICDVT) includes thrombosis located at the far end of the popliteal vein, such as the anterior tibial vein, posterior tibial vein, fibular vein, and intramuscular vein of the soleus and gastrocnemius. This type of thrombosis has the highest incidence, accounting for approximately half of all deep vein thrombosis (DVT) cases; however, there is no consistent recommendation for ICDVT treatment across countries, and there is also no optimal management strategy. In recent years, increasing evidence has shown that ICDVT can develop into proximal DVT, even causing pulmonary embolism (PE). Therefore, some experts suggest anticoagulant therapy for this type of DVT, while others hold an opposing attitude. Therefore, the treatment strategy for this type of DVT has become a hot and difficult research topic. The purpose of this review is to summarize the characteristics of ICDVT and the effects of different treatment strategies by analyzing recent and important classical works in the literature in an attempt to provide recommendations for the treatment of this most common type of DVT in orthopaedic clinics.

Incidence and Outcomes Associated with 6841 Isolated Distal Deep Vein Thromboses in Patients with 13 Common Cancers

INTRODUCTION

The epidemiology of isolated distal deep venous thrombosis (iDDVT) among cancer patients is not well described, particularly the incidence of recurrent venous thromboembolism (rVTE) and effect on mortality by cancer type.

METHODS

The cumulative incidence (CI) of iDDVT was determined for patients with 13 common cancers between 2005-2017 using the California Cancer Registry linked to the California Patient Discharge and Emergency Department Utilization datasets. The CI of rVTE was calculated and association of incident CAT location with rVTE was determined using Cox proportional hazards regression models. The association of incident cancer-associated venous thrombosis (CAT) location with overall and cancer-specific mortality was determined using Cox models, stratified by cancer site, and adjusted for individual characteristics.

RESULTS

Among 942,109 cancer patients, CAT occurred in 62,003 (6.6%): of these, 6,841 (11.0%) were iDDVT. Compared to more proximal sites of CAT, iDDVT was associated with similar risk for rVTE. IDDVT was associated with increased mortality across all cancer types when compared to patients without CAT (HR 1.56-4.60). The effect of iDDVT on mortality was similar to that of proximal DVT (pDVT) for most cancers except lung, colorectal, bladder, uterine, brain, and myeloma, where iDDVT was associated with a lesser association with mortality.

CONCLUSION

iDDVT represented 11% of CAT. The risk of rVTE after iDDVT was similar to other sites of CAT and rVTE occurred in more proximal locations after an incident iDDVT. IDDVT was associated with increased mortality and this effect was similar to that of PE or pDVT for most cancer types.

Primary Medial Gastrocnemius Vein Aneurysm With Thrombosis

A venous aneurysm (VA) in a calf muscle is extremely rare. In this case study, a primary medial gastrocnemius vein aneurysm (MGVA) with thrombosis is reported. A female patient presented with left medial knee pain for 2 weeks. Radiograph demonstrated severe osteoarthritis of the medial compartment of the left knee. Sonography of the knee incidentally detected a focal saccular dilation in one of the gastrocnemius veins, within the medial head of the gastrocnemius (MHG). The diameter of the dilation was almost three times its connected normal vein. Two-thirds of the saccular dilation was occupied by hyperechoic content. Duplex sonography confirmed that the dilation was a saccular MGVA with thrombosis. The patient had no history of knee trauma, surgery, or inflammation. A small Baker’s cyst, medial to the MHG, was also excluded from the cause of the MGVA. These suggest that this MGVA was of a primary cause. The complications of a MGVA are briefly discussed as part of this case study.

Development of a risk stratification scoring system for deep vein thrombosis upon psychiatric admission

AIM

Psychiatric patients have increased risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). However, there is no systematic data on risk assessment of DVT among psychiatric inpatients. The aim of this study was to develop a risk stratification scoring system for DVT among psychiatic patients on admission.

METHODS

A systematic review of psychiatric patient's charts, who were admitted to the Tokyo Metropolitan Matsuzawa Hospital from June 2012 to February 2016 and underwent screening for DVT, was conducted. Patients were randomly divided into development (n = 2634) and validation (n = 2634) groups. Estimated risk values in the multiple logistic regression model for the development sample were rounded to the nearest integer, and used as points of associated factors in the risk stratification scoring system; the total scores were tested in the validation sample. The score's discriminatory ability was assessed with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

RESULTS

Among the 5268 patients, 258 (4.9%) had DVT. Advancing age, female sex, active cancer, previous venous thromboembolism, transfer from a general hospital, catatonia, and major depressive episode were all significantly associated with the presence of DVT in the development sample. The total score showed good discriminatory ability in the validation sample (AUC: 0.816, 95% confidence interval: 0.781-0.851); scores of 0-1, 2-3, 4-5, and ≥ 6 were associated with very low risk (0.7%), low risk (4.6%), moderate risk (14.9%), and high risk (35%) for DVT, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our risk stratification scoring system showed good performance for detection of DVT among psychiatric patients on admission.

A risk score for iliofemoral patients with deep vein thrombosis

OBJECTIVE

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a common condition with a high risk of post-thrombotic morbidity, especially in patients with a proximal thrombus. Successful iliofemoral clot removal has been shown to decrease the severity of post-thrombotic syndrome. It is assumed that earlier thrombus lysis is associated with a better outcome. Generally, the earlier IFDVT is confirmed, the earlier thrombus lysis could be performed. d-Dimer levels and Wells score are currently used to assess the preduplex probability for DVT; however, some studies indicate that the d-dimer value varies depending on the thrombus extent and localization. Using d-dimer and other risk factors might facilitate development of a model selecting those with an increased risk of IFDVT that might benefit from early referral for additional analysis and adjunctive iliofemoral thrombectomy.

METHODS

All consecutive adult patients from a retrospective cohort of STAR diagnostic center (primary care) in Rotterdam suspected of having DVT between September 2004 and August 2016 were assessed for this retrospective study. The diagnostic workup for DVT including Wells score and d-dimer were performed as well as complete duplex ultrasound examination. Patients with objective evidence of DVT were categorized according to thrombus localization using the Lower Extremity Thrombolysis classification. Logistic regression analysis was done for a model predicting IFDVT. The cut-off value of the model was determined using a receiver operating characteristic curve.

RESULTS

A total of 3381 patients were eligible for study recruitment, of whom 489 (14.5%) had confirmed DVT. We developed a multivariate model (sensitivity of 77% and specificity of 82%; area under the curve, 0.90; 0.86-0.93) based on d-dimer, Wells score, age, and anticoagulation use, which is able to distinguish IFDVT patients from all patients suspected of DVT.

CONCLUSIONS

This multivariate model adequately distinguishes IFDVT among all suspected DVT patients. Practically, this model could give each patient a preduplex risk score, which could be used to prioritize suspected IFDVT patients for an immediate imaging test to confirm or exclude IFDVT. Further validation studies are needed to confirm potential of this prediction model for IFDVT.

Individualized predictions of early isolated distal deep vein thrombosis in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a retrospective study

Background

Although isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (IDDVT) is a clinical complication for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients, very few clinicians value it and few methods can predict early IDDVT. This study aimed to establish and validate an individualized predictive nomogram for the risk of early IDDVT in AIS patients.

Methods

This study enrolled 647 consecutive AIS patients who were randomly divided into a training cohort (n = 431) and a validation cohort (n = 216). Based on logistic analyses in training cohort, a nomogram was constructed to predict early IDDVT. The nomogram was then validated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and calibration plots.

Results

The multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that age, gender, lower limb paralysis, current pneumonia, atrial fibrillation and malignant tumor were independent risk factors of early IDDVT; these variables were integrated to construct the nomogram. Calibration plots revealed acceptable agreement between the predicted and actual IDDVT probabilities in both the training and validation cohorts. The nomogram had AUROC values of 0.767 (95% CI: 0.742–0.806) and 0.820 (95% CI: 0.762–0.869) in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Additionally, in the validation cohort, the AUROC of the nomogram was higher than those of the other scores for predicting IDDVT.

Conclusions

The present nomogram provides clinicians with a novel and easy-to-use tool for the prediction of the individualized risk of IDDVT in the early stages of AIS, which would be helpful to initiate imaging examination and interventions timely.

Venous Duplex Ultrasound Surveillance in the Neurosurgical Population: A Single-Center Quality Improvement Initiative

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) represents a significant source of morbidity and mortality in the inpatient population and is considered a leading preventable cause of death among inpatients. Neurosurgical inpatients are of particular interest because of the greater rates of immobility, steroid use, and potential consequences of postoperative hemorrhage. A consensus protocol for VTE screening in this population has not yet been developed, and institutional protocols vary widely.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of lower extremity venous duplex ultrasonography (VDUS) usage at our institution and applied this information to the development of a neurosurgery department protocol, with consideration of high-risk patient risk factors and indications for VDUS ordering. We then implemented this protocol, which consisted of preoperative screening of patients at high risk of VTE and limited postoperative surveillance, for a 6-month period and compared VDUS usage and VTE occurrence.

RESULTS

Preoperative VDUS screening before nonemergent neurosurgical procedures in high-risk patients with active cancer, an inability to ambulate, or a history of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) identified proximal DVTs that were then treated. Postoperative routine surveillance VDUS scans only diagnosed incidental isolated calf DVT for which no clinically relevant sequelae occurred. Overall, postoperative surveillance VDUS usage decreased significantly (66.9% vs. 13.5%; P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings lend support to preoperative screening of high-risk patients and suggest that routine postoperative VDUS surveillance of asymptomatic patients is unnecessary.

Distal Deep Vein Thrombosis Causing Pulmonary Embolism after Outpatient Plastic Surgery: A Case Report

A distal deep vein thrombosis is generally believed to be clinically unimportant because of a low incidence of pulmonary emboli. To the author’s knowledge, a symptomatic pulmonary embolism has not been reported in association with an isolated calf deep vein thrombosis in a plastic surgery outpatient. This case report provides the clinical details of a pulmonary embolism occurring after routine ultrasound detection of a distal deep vein thrombosis. Proximal deep venous thromboses originate in the calf and are dangerous because they frequently embolize. Ultrasound surveillance provides early detection of subclinical distal deep vein thromboses. Anticoagulation is initiated, suppressing propagation of the thrombosis to the deep veins of the thigh, and reducing the risk of a catastrophic pulmonary embolism.

Clinical Evaluation of 225 Sub-SMAS Facelifts with No Temporal Incision

BACKGROUND

Despite their name, "short scar" procedures leave scars in the temples and the postauricular scar often requires extension. Redraping the orbicularis muscle for periorbital rejuvenation increases the risk of facial nerve injury. This retrospective cohort study was undertaken to clinically evaluate a surgical approach that eliminates the temporal incision.

METHODS

A sub-superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) facelift was used, incorporating a triple-vector platysmaplasty and fat injection for periorbital rejuvenation. From 2009 to 2019, 225 consecutive outpatients underwent a sub-SMAS facelift with a triple-vector (superior, lateral, medial) platysmaplasty, either alone or in combination with fat injection, laser resurfacing, blepharoplasties, endoscopic forehead lift, and other cosmetic procedures. Release of the retaining ligaments optimized SMAS mobilization. A temporal incision was not used. Fat (mean volume 32 ml) was injected into the undissected subcutaneous tissue plane. The mean follow-up time was 28 months.

RESULTS

The most frequent complication was a neuropraxia (7.6%), usually affecting a frontal nerve branch, and always temporary. Two deep venous thromboses were detected by ultrasound surveillance. No significant correlation was detected between complications and age, sex, body mass index, smoking history, or a previous facelift. Sixteen patients (7%) returned for a secondary facelift (mean interval, 3.5 years).

CONCLUSIONS

A sub-SMAS facelift and triple-vector platysmaplasty with fat injection combine effective neckline rejuvenation with facial volume restoration. Avoiding a temporal incision eliminates a telltale scar. Orbicularis preservation avoids additional dissection, possibly reducing the risk of neuropraxia. Fat injection provides a net increase in facial volume. Long-term measurement studies are recommended.

Clinical course of isolated distal deep vein thrombosis in patients with active cancer: a multicenter cohort study

Essentials Isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (IDDVT) is frequently associated with cancer. No study has specifically evaluated the long-term clinical course of cancer-associated IDDVT. Patients with cancer-associated IDDVT are at very high risk of symptomatic recurrence and death. We observed low rates of major bleeding during anticoagulation.

SUMMARY

Background Although isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (IDDVT) is frequently associated with cancer, no study has specifically evaluated the long-term clinical course of IDDVT in this setting. Aim To provide data on the rate of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE), major bleeding events and death in IDDVT patients with active cancer. Patients and Methods Consecutive patients with active cancer and an objective IDDVT diagnosis (January 2011 to September 2014) were included from our files. We collected information on baseline characteristics, IDDVT location and extension, VTE risk factors, and type and duration of anticoagulant treatment. Results A total of 308 patients (mean age 66.2 [standard deviation (SD), 13.2 years]; 57.1% female) with symptomatic IDDVT and a solid (n = 261) or hematologic (n = 47) cancer were included at 13 centers. Cancer was metastatic in 148 (48.1%) patients. All but three (99.0%) patients received anticoagulant therapy, which consisted of low-molecular-weight heparin in 288 (93.5%) patients. Vitamin K antagonists were used for the long-term treatment in 46 (14.9%) patients, whereas all others continued the initial parenteral agent for a mean treatment duration of 4.2 months (SD, 4.6 months). During a total follow-up of 355.8 patient-years (mean, 13.9 months), there were 47 recurrent objectively diagnosed VTEs for an incidence rate of 13.2 events per 100 patient-years. During anticoagulant treatment, the annual incidence of major bleeding was 2.0 per 100 patient-years. Conclusions Cancer patients with IDDVT have a high risk of VTE recurrence. Additional studies are warranted to investigate the optimal intensity and duration of anticoagulant treatment for these patients.

Anticoagulation in patients with isolated distal deep vein thrombosis: a meta-analysis

Essentials The optimal management of isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (IDDVT) is undefined. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the clinical benefit of anticoagulation for IDDVT. Anticoagulation reduced the rate of pulmonary embolism without increasing major bleeding risk. Recurrent thromboembolism was less common with more than 6 weeks vs. 6 weeks of anticoagulation.

SUMMARY

Background The optimal management of patients with isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (IDDVT), concerning both the need for anticoagulation and its duration, is undefined. Objectives We performed a meta-analysis of randomized and cohort studies in patients with IDDVT to assess the clinical benefit of: (i) anticoagulation versus no anticoagulation; and (ii) anticoagulant treatment for 6 weeks versus for > 6 weeks. Methods The primary outcome of this analysis was recurrent venous thromboembolism (proximal propagation, recurrence of deep vein thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism). Data were pooled and compared by the use of odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Results A reduction in the rate of recurrent venous thromboembolism was observed in patients who received anticoagulation relative to those who did not receive anticoagulation (either therapeutic or prophylactic) (20 studies, 2936 patients; OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.31-0.79), without an increase in the risk of major bleeding (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.15-2.73). The rate of pulmonary embolism was lower in anticoagulant-treated patients than in controls (15 studies, 1997 patients; OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.25-0.91). A lower rate of recurrent venous thromboembolism was observed in patients who received > 6 weeks of anticoagulant therapy than in those who received 6 weeks of anticoagulant therapy (four studies, 1136 patients; OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.17-0.90). Conclusions In patients with IDDVT, anticoagulation (both therapeutic and prophylactic) reduces the rate of recurrent venous thromboembolism and the incidence of pulmonary embolism as compared with no anticoagulation, without an increased risk of major bleeding. Anticoagulation for > 6 weeks should be preferred over shorter durations.

Treatment of Isolated Below the Knee Deep Vein Thrombosis

The natural history of isolated distal deep-vein thrombosis (IDDVT) is still uncertain, as well as the real clinical risks associated with the disease and the need for its diagnosis and treatment. While more and more IDDVTs are diagnosed in everyday clinical practice, their appropriate therapeutic management is, unfortunately, far from straightforward, and different recommendations on how patients with diagnosed IDDVT should be treated are present between expert professionals and even among international guidelines. The present article aims at briefly reviewing the issue of IDDVT therapy in general, particularly focusing on the different approaches to the treatment of the disease that have been suggested by recent guidelines, those that are currently adopted in clinical practice, and necessary future directions.

Guidance for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism

This guidance document focuses on the diagnosis and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Efficient, cost effective diagnosis of VTE is facilitated by combining medical history and physical examination with pre-test probability models, D dimer testing and selective use of confirmatory imaging. Clinical prediction rules, biomarkers and imaging can be used to tailor therapy to disease severity. Anticoagulation options for acute VTE include unfractionated heparin, low molecular weight heparin, fondaparinux and the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). DOACs are as effective as conventional therapy with LMWH and vitamin K antagonists. Thrombolytic therapy is reserved for massive pulmonary embolism (PE) or extensive deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Inferior vena cava filters are reserved for patients with acute VTE and contraindications to anticoagulation. Retrievable filters are strongly preferred. The possibility of thoracic outlet syndrome and May-Thurner syndrome should be considered in patients with subclavian/axillary and left common iliac vein DVT, respectively in absence of identifiable triggers. The optimal duration of therapy is dictated by the presence of modifiable thrombotic risk factors. Long term anticoagulation should be considered in patients with unprovoked VTE as well as persistent prothrombotic risk factors such as cancer. Short-term therapy is sufficient for most patients with VTE associated with transient situational triggers such as major surgery. Biomarkers such as D dimer and risk assessment models such the Vienna risk prediction model offer the potential to customize VTE therapy for the individual patient. Insufficient data exist to support the integration of bleeding risk models into duration of therapy planning.

Thrombophilia genetic testing in Romanian young women with acute thrombotic events: role of Factor V Leiden, Prothrombin G20210A, MTHFR C677T and A1298C polymorphisms / Evaluarea genetică a trombofiliilor la femei tinere din România cu evenimente acute trombotice: rolul Factorului V Leiden, Protrombinei G20210A, polimorfismelor MTHFR C677T și A1298C

Objective: The present case-control study aimed at evaluating the contribution of thrombophilic polymorphisms to acute venous (VTE) as well as arterial thrombotic events (ATE) in a population of young women with few traditional thrombotic factors (CVRF).

Methods: We consecutively enrolled patients under 45 years of age, with less than 3 CVRF, evaluated for VTE or ATE, women and men as a comparator. The control group consisted of healthy young women. A thrombophilia panel and genetic testing for Factor V Leiden (FVL), G20210A Prothrombin and MTHFR polimorphisms were done.

Results: A total of 323 persons were enrolled: 71 women and 121 men with thromboembolic events, and 131 healthy female as controls. Hyperhomocysteinemia was more frequent in ATE (30.4%) than VTE female patients (6.25%), p<0.01. Genetic testing was available in 45 women and 84 men with acute thrombotic events and in all controls. Homozygous FVL was associated with VTE in young women (10.3% vs 0% controls, p<0.01). Prothrombin G20210A polymorphism had the lowest prevalence – 5.4% and only heterozygosity was found. MTHFR C677T heterozygosity showed no significant difference between women patients and controls (62.2 % vs 43.5% respectively, p=0.1). The homozygous status, less frequent (6.6%), was not associated with ATE or VTE. Homozygous MTHFR A1298C was associated with VTE in women (17.2% patients vs 4.5% controls, OR 4.34, p 0.02, CI 1.22-15.3).

Conclusion: In young women with few CVRF, mild hyperhomocysteinemia, homozygosity for FVL and for MTHFR A1298C polymorphisms increase the risk for VTE but not ATE. MTHFR polymorphisms are found with increased frequency in both healthy persons and patients therefore, their significance as an important thrombotic risk modifier remains unclear.

Controversies in venous thromboembolism: the unique case of isolated distal deep vein thrombosis

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) represents the third leading cause of cardiovascular mortality, and it is the main cause of preventable mortality in hospitalized patients. Among VTE, there is the unique case of isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (IDDVT), which still lacks an agreement in terms of optimal therapeutic strategy. Although most IDDVTs are self-limiting and associated with a very low risk of embolic complications, still not all IDDVTs can be safely identified as stable. Lack of strong scientific evidence, fear of thromboembolic complications, and risk of bleeding upon initiation of anticoagulant treatment result in very heterogeneous therapeutic strategies among physicians. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of the literature, highlight the many controversial issues regarding IDDVTs, and call for a consensus of experts aimed to shed new light on the gray areas of IDDVT management and therapy.

Emergency Department Management of Suspected Calf-Vein Deep Venous Thrombosis: A Diagnostic Algorithm

Introduction

Unilateral leg swelling with suspicion of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is a common emergency department (ED) presentation. Proximal DVT (thrombus in the popliteal or femoral veins) can usually be diagnosed and treated at the initial ED encounter. When proximal DVT has been ruled out, isolated calf-vein deep venous thrombosis (IC-DVT) often remains a consideration. The current standard for the diagnosis of IC-DVT is whole-leg vascular duplex ultrasonography (WLUS), a test that is unavailable in many hospitals outside normal business hours. When WLUS is not available from the ED, recommendations for managing suspected IC-DVT vary. The objectives of the study is to use current evidence and recommendations to (1) propose a diagnostic algorithm for IC-DVT when definitive testing (WLUS) is unavailable; and (2) summarize the controversy surrounding IC-DVT treatment.

Discussion

The Figure combines D-dimer testing with serial CUS or a single deferred FLUS for the diagnosis of IC-DVT. Such an algorithm has the potential to safely direct the management of suspected IC-DVT when definitive testing is unavailable. Whether or not to treat diagnosed IC-DVT remains widely debated and awaiting further evidence.

Conclusion

When IC-DVT is not ruled out in the ED, the suggested algorithm, although not prospectively validated by a controlled study, offers an approach to diagnosis that is consistent with current data and recommendations. When IC-DVT is diagnosed, current references suggest that a decision between anticoagulation and continued follow-up outpatient testing can be based on shared decision-making. The risks of proximal progression and life-threatening embolization should be balanced against the generally more benign natural history of such thrombi, and an individual patient’s risk factors for both thrombus propagation and complications of anticoagulation.

Retrospective review on isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (IDDVT) - A benign entity or not?

INTRODUCTION

Isolated distal deep venous thrombosis (IDDVT) is traditionally associated with less severe clinical sequelae, with ongoing debate on multiple aspects of its management. Despite numerous studies evaluating its acute management, there remains a paucity of data evaluating long-term complications such as recurrence and subsequent malignancy. We aim to evaluate the characteristics of IDDVT in institutions that routinely perform whole leg ultrasonography, and the risks of recurrence and complications in comparison to major venous thromboembolism (major VTE; defined as above-knee or proximal DVT and pulmonary embolism (PE)).

METHODS

Retrospective evaluation of consecutive IDDVT and major VTE from July 2011 to December 2012 in a hospital network in Melbourne, Australia. Patients were followed up for a minimum of 24months. Patients with active malignancy were excluded.

RESULTS

Of 1024 VTE cases, there were 164 non-cancer patients (92 males, 72 females, median age of 61years) with IDDVT. Compared to major VTE, IDDVT was more likely to be provoked (73% vs 59%, p<0.01), has shorter duration of anticoagulation (median 3.5months vs 6.0months, p<0.01) and less clinically significant bleeding (2.4% vs 6.7%, p=0.05), independent of duration of therapy. Recurrence was non-inferior compared to major VTE (10% vs 7%, p=0.36) and 60% recurred with major VTE. Three (1.8%) were subsequently diagnosed with cancer (vs 1.9% in major VTE, p=0.97).

CONCLUSIONS

IDDVT has non-inferior rates of recurrence and subsequent cancer detection compared to major VTE and hence, its clinical significance should not differ from major VTE. Further studies are required to determine the adequate length of anticoagulation.

Antithrombotic Therapy for VTE Disease: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report

BACKGROUND

We update recommendations on 12 topics that were in the 9th edition of these guidelines, and address 3 new topics.

METHODS

We generate strong (Grade 1) and weak (Grade 2) recommendations based on high- (Grade A), moderate- (Grade B), and low- (Grade C) quality evidence.

RESULTS

For VTE and no cancer, as long-term anticoagulant therapy, we suggest dabigatran (Grade 2B), rivaroxaban (Grade 2B), apixaban (Grade 2B), or edoxaban (Grade 2B) over vitamin K antagonist (VKA) therapy, and suggest VKA therapy over low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH; Grade 2C). For VTE and cancer, we suggest LMWH over VKA (Grade 2B), dabigatran (Grade 2C), rivaroxaban (Grade 2C), apixaban (Grade 2C), or edoxaban (Grade 2C). We have not changed recommendations for who should stop anticoagulation at 3 months or receive extended therapy. For VTE treated with anticoagulants, we recommend against an inferior vena cava filter (Grade 1B). For DVT, we suggest not using compression stockings routinely to prevent PTS (Grade 2B). For subsegmental pulmonary embolism and no proximal DVT, we suggest clinical surveillance over anticoagulation with a low risk of recurrent VTE (Grade 2C), and anticoagulation over clinical surveillance with a high risk (Grade 2C). We suggest thrombolytic therapy for pulmonary embolism with hypotension (Grade 2B), and systemic therapy over catheter-directed thrombolysis (Grade 2C). For recurrent VTE on a non-LMWH anticoagulant, we suggest LMWH (Grade 2C); for recurrent VTE on LMWH, we suggest increasing the LMWH dose (Grade 2C).

CONCLUSIONS

Of 54 recommendations included in the 30 statements, 20 were strong and none was based on high-quality evidence, highlighting the need for further research.

Ultrasound screening for deep venous thrombosis detection: a prospective evaluation of 200 plastic surgery outpatients

Background:

Our understanding of the pathophysiology of venous thromboembolism is largely based on the experience of orthopedic patients undergoing total joint replacement. Little is known regarding the natural history of venous thromboembolism in plastic surgery outpatients. Today, ultrasound screening, including compression and Doppler color flow imaging, represents the standard for detecting deep venous thromboses.

Methods:

Ultrasound screening was offered to 200 consecutive plastic surgery outpatients undergoing 205 operations. Patients were scanned before surgery, on the day after surgery, and approximately 1 week after surgery. No patient declined to participate (inclusion rate, 100%). Spontaneous breathing, Avoid gas, Face up, Extremities mobile anesthesia was used, with no chemoprophylaxis. Patient surveys were administered.

Results:

Six hundred ultrasound screening tests were performed. All scans performed the day after surgery were negative. Only one examination was positive, 8 days after a lipoabdominoplasty. Subsequent scans revealed complete resolution of the thrombosis with anticoagulation. Ninety percent of surveyed patients would choose to have ultrasound screening in the future.

Conclusions:

The natural history of thromboembolism in plastic surgery outpatients differs from orthopedic patients. The risk of a deep venous thrombosis in a patient treated with Spontaneous breathing, Avoid gas, Face up, Extremities mobile anesthesia is approximately 0.5%. Thromboses are unlikely to develop intraoperatively. In the single affected patient, the thrombosis was located distally, in a location that is less prone to embolism and highly susceptible to anticoagulation. Ultrasound screening is an effective and highly feasible method to identify affected patients for treatment.

Two years outcome of isolated distal deep vein thrombosis

BACKGROUND

Isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (IDDVT) is frequently found in symptomatic outpatients, but its long term outcome is still uncertain.

AIMS

To assess IDDVT long term outcome and the impact of IDDVT characteristics on outcome.

METHODS

In a prospective, single center study we enrolled symptomatic outpatients in whom IDDVT was detected by whole-leg compression ultrasonography. Patients with provoked IDDVT were treated with low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) for 30 days while those with unprovoked IDDVT received with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) for three months. The primary end-point was the rate of the composite of pulmonary embolism (PE), proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and IDDVT recurrence/extension during 24 month follow-up.

RESULTS

90 patients (age 61 ± 18, male 48.9%) were enrolled. Risk factors for thrombosis were reduced mobility (34.4%), obesity (25.3%), surgery (15.6%), and previous DVT (15.6%) and cancer in 8 patients (8.9%). Eighty-eight patients were treated (56 with LMWH and 32 with VKA). During follow-up (median 24 ± 2 months), 17 events were recorded, which included 3 PE (two in cancer patients), 4 proximal DVTs (one in cancer patient) and 10 IDDVT. Male sex (HR 4.73 CI95%: 1.55-14.5; p=0.006) and cancer (HR 5.47 CI95%: 1.76-17.6; p=0.003) were associated with a higher risk of complications, whereas IDDVT anatomical characteristics, anticoagulant therapy type, and provoked IDDVT were not.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism after IDDVT may be relevant in male patients or in patients with active cancer. Larger studies are needed to address this issue.

How I treat isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (IDDVT)

Thromboses limited to infrapopliteal leg deep veins (isolated distal deep vein thrombosis [IDDVT]) are frequently diagnosed in subjects with suspected pulmonary embolism or DVT and account for one-fourth to one-half of all diagnosed leg DVTs. Despite their frequency, the natural history of IDDVTs and their real risk of thromboembolic complications are still uncertain because of the scarcity of prospective, blind, nonintervention studies. Therefore it is still debated whether they warrant diagnosis and treatment. Diagnosis is based on ultrasonographic examination, which is more operator dependent and less sensitive in distal than in proximal veins. The available data seem to support the view that most IDDVTs are self-limiting and inconsequential for patients, though in some cases they can be associated with complications and warrant diagnosis and treatment. The available guidelines for treatment of IDDVTs give different indications ranging from serial imaging of the deep veins for 2 weeks to detect and treat only in case of proximal extension, to giving oral anticoagulation in all IDDVT patients for 3 months. I review this issue, focusing on possible and suggested treatments in symptomatic IDDVT patients, and describe our current therapeutic approach to these patients.