Drug interaction as a predictor of direct oral anticoagulant drug levels in atrial fibrillation patients

Does amiodarone impact on apixaban levels? The effect of amiodarone on apixaban level among Thai patients with non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Apixaban and amiodarone are drugs used for non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in routine practice. The evidence about apixaban plasma levels in patients who receive apixaban with amiodarone, including bleeding outcomes, has been limited. This study aimed to compare the apixaban plasma levels and bleeding outcomes between apixaban monotherapy and apixaban with amiodarone groups.

METHODS

This study was a prospective, observational, and single-center research which was conducted from January 2021 to January 2022 in NVAF patients who received apixaban at a tertiary care hospital located in the center of Bangkok, Thailand.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients were measured for their median (5th-95th percentile) apixaban plasma levels. The trough of apixaban plasma level (Ctrough) were 108.49 [78.10-171.52] and 162.05 [87.94-292.88] μg/L in the apixaban monotherapy and apixaban with amiodarone groups, respectively (p = 0.028). Additionally, the peaks of apixaban plasma level (Cpeak) were 175.36 [122.94-332.34] and 191 [116.88-488.21] μg/L in the apixaban monotherapy and apixaban with amiodarone groups, respectively (p = 0.375). There was bleeding that occurred in 7 patients (21.21%); 5 patients in the apixaban monotherapy group and 2 patients in the apixaban with amiodarone group, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Amiodarone may increase the peaks and troughs of apixaban plasma levels. The co-administration of apixaban with amiodarone is generally well tolerated. However, the careful observation of bleeding symptoms in individual cases is necessary to ensure safety.

Simvastatin, but Not Atorvastatin, Is Associated with Higher Peak Rivaroxaban Serum Levels and Bleeding: an Asian Cohort Study from Singapore

AIMS

This study attempts to identify predictors associated with bleeding and stroke and systemic embolism (SSE) in Singaporean Asians taking rivaroxaban and apixaban.

METHODS

A total of 134 Singaporean patients on either rivaroxaban or apixaban for non-valvular atrial fibrillation were included for this study. Baseline characteristics were recorded at recruitment while bleeding and SSE events were recorded during a 1-year follow-up. Peak and trough drug plasma concentrations were collected based on the dosing interval and pharmacokinetics of the drugs and quantified using high performance liquid chromatography. Characteristics of patients with or without bleeds were compared using relevant statistical tests. Multivariable regression that included covariates with p < 0.1 from an initial univariable regression was performed to analyse predictors that resulted in higher risk of bleeding in patients.

RESULTS

Median creatinine clearance (CrCl) was significantly lower in patients on rivaroxaban who experienced bleeds as compared to patients who did not experience bleeds (61.5 vs 70.8 mL/min, p = 0.047), while concomitant simvastatin use was found to be independently associated with a sixfold increased risk of bleeding (adjusted OR = 6.14 (95% CI: 1.18-31.97), p = 0.031) for rivaroxaban after controlling for body mass index, CrCl and having experienced a previous SSE.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that concomitant use of simvastatin with rivaroxaban may be associated with bleeding events in an Asian cohort. Further studies using physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling are required to investigate the drug-drug interactions between these drugs.

Prevalence and bleeding risk associated with the concomitant use of direct oral anticoagulants and antiarrhythmic drugs in patients with atrial fibrillation, based on the French healthcare insurance database

PURPOSE

Pharmacokinetic interactions exist between apixaban or rivaroxaban, and CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein inhibitors such as amiodarone, verapamil and diltiazem. We aimed to estimate the prevalence of exposure to this drug-drug association (DDA) and to assess the bleeding risk associated in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS

We conducted a cohort study using a representative 1/97^th sample of the French healthcare insurance database between 2014 and 2019. Patients with AF receiving apixaban or rivaroxaban were included and followed-up until hospitalization for bleeding, death, discontinuation of apixaban or rivaroxaban, exposure to strong CYP3A4 inhibitor, or until December 31^st 2019, whichever came first. Primary outcome was hospitalization for bleeding registered as primary diagnosis. The association between the exposure to the DDA and hospitalization for bleeding was evaluated as a time-dependent variable in Cox model.

RESULTS

Between 2014 and 2019, the AF population under apixaban or rivaroxaban represented 10,392 patients. During the study period, the annual average prevalence of DDA exposure in this population was 38.9%. Among the 10,392 patients, 223 (2.1%) were hospitalized for bleeding, of which 75 (33.6%) received the association and 148 (66.4%) received apixaban or rivaroxaban alone. There was no association between DDA exposure and risk of hospitalization for bleeding (aHR = 1.19, [95% CI: 0.90, 1.58]). Age (HR 1.03 [1.02, 1.05]) and male gender (HR 1.72 [1.28, 2.30]) were associated with an increased risk of hospitalization for bleeding.

CONCLUSION

Exposure to antiarrhythmic drugs was not associated with an increased risk of hospitalization for bleeding in patients with AF under rivaroxaban or apixaban.

Impact of amiodarone on plasma concentration of direct oral anticoagulant in patients with atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Amiodarone increases exposure of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). We aimed to analyze the effects of concurrent amiodarone use on DOAC concentrations and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Patients who were ≥20 years of age, had atrial fibrillation, and took DOAC were enrolled to provide trough and peak samples for DOAC concentration measurements using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The results were compared with concentrations reported in clinical trials to define above, within, or under the expected range. The outcomes of interest were major bleeding and any gastrointestinal bleeding. Multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards model were used to determine the impact of amiodarone on above-range concentration and clinical outcomes, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 722 participants (420 men, 58.2%) were enrolled to provide 691 trough samples and 689 peak samples. Among them, 21.3% concurrently used amiodarone. The proportion of patients with above-range trough and peak concentrations was 16.4% and 30.2%, respectively, for amiodarone users, in contrast to 9.4% and 19.8% for amiodarone non-users. The use of amiodarone was associated with above-range trough and peak concentrations (odds ratio [OR] = 2.00 [1.16, 3.47] and 1.82 [1.19, 2.79], respectively). However, amiodarone was not a significant predictor of major bleeding or any gastrointestinal bleeding.

CONCLUSION

Concurrent amiodarone use led to increased DOAC concentration but was not associated with a higher risk of major bleeding or any gastrointestinal bleeding. Therapeutic monitoring of DOAC users concurrently taking amiodarone may be recommended for patients with an additional risk of increased DOAC exposure.

Do Apixaban Plasma Levels Relate to Bleeding? The Clinical Outcomes and Predictive Factors for Bleeding in Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation

Apixaban can significantly prevent stroke events in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), as can be observed from the large, randomized, controlled trial conducted in the present study. However, the real-world evidence of bleeding events related to the apixaban plasma levels in Asian populations is limited. This study aimed to investigate the apixaban plasma levels and clinical outcomes among NVAF patients receiving apixaban, including determining the risk factors associated with bleeding during routine care. Seventy-one patients were included in the study. The median values were 112.79 (5–95th percentiles: 68.69–207.8) μg/L and 185.62 (5–95th percentiles: 124.06–384.34) μg/L for the apixaban trough (C_trough) and apixaban peak plasma levels (C_peak), respectively. Stroke and bleeding were found in 8 (11.27%) and 14 patients (19.72%), respectively. There was no statistical significance for C_trough and C_peak in the stroke and non-stroke groups, respectively. The median of C_trough (139.15 μg/L) in patients with bleeding was higher than that in the non-bleeding group (108.14 μg/L), but there was no statistical significance. However, multivariate analyses showed that bleeding history (odds ratio (OR): 17.62; 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.54–176.64; and p-value = 0.002) and C_trough (OR: 1.01; 95%: CI 1.00–1.03; and p-value = 0.038) were related to bleeding events. Almost all of the patients presented apixaban plasma levels within the expected range. Interestingly, bleeding events were associated with the troughs of the apixaban plasma levels and bleeding history.

Impact of the Genotype and Phenotype of CYP3A and P-gp on the Apixaban and Rivaroxaban Exposure in a Real-World Setting

Apixaban and rivaroxaban are the two most prescribed direct factor Xa inhibitors. With the increased use of DOACs in real-world settings, safety and efficacy concerns have emerged, particularly regarding their concomitant use with other drugs. Increasing evidence highlights drug−drug interactions with CYP3A/P-gp modulators leading to adverse events. However, current recommendations for dose adjustment do not consider CYP3A/P-gp genotype and phenotype. We aimed to determine their impact on apixaban and rivaroxaban blood exposure. Three-hundred hospitalized patients were included. CYP3A and P-gp phenotypic activities were assessed by the metabolic ratio of midazolam and AUC0−6h of fexofenadine, respectively. Relevant CYP3A and ABCB1 genetic polymorphisms were also tested. Capillary blood samples collected at four time-points after apixaban or rivaroxaban administration allowed the calculation of pharmacokinetic parameters. According to the developed multivariable linear regression models, P-gp activity (p < 0.001) and creatinine clearance (CrCl) (p = 0.01) significantly affected apixaban AUC0−6h. P-gp activity (p < 0.001) also significantly impacted rivaroxaban AUC0−6h. The phenotypic switch (from normal to poor metabolizer) of P-gp led to an increase of apixaban and rivaroxaban AUC0−6h by 16% and 25%, respectively, equivalent to a decrease of 38 mL/min in CrCl according to the apixaban model. CYP3A phenotype and tested SNPs of CYP3A/P-gp had no significant impact. In conclusion, P-gp phenotypic activity, rather than known CYP3A/P-gp polymorphisms, could be relevant for dose adjustment.

Outcomes of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Co-Prescribed with Common Interacting Medications

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) can potentially interact with multiple prescription medications. We examined the prevalence of co-prescription of DOACs with interacting medications and its impact on outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Patients with AF treated with a DOAC from 2010 to 2017 at the Mayo Clinic and co-prescribed medications that are inhibitors or inducers of the P-glycoprotein and/or Cytochrome P450 3A4 pathways were identified. The outcomes of stroke, transient ischemic attack, or systemic embolism, major bleeding, and minor bleeds were compared between patients with and without an enzyme inducer. Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the association between interacting medications and outcomes. Of 8,576 patients with AF (mean age 70 ± 12 years, 35% female) prescribed a DOAC (38.6% apixaban, 35.8% rivaroxaban, 25.6% dabigatran), 2,610 (30.4%) were on at least 1 interacting agent: the majority were on an enzyme inhibitor (n = 2,592). Prescribed medications included non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker (n = 1,412; 16.5%), antiarrhythmic medication (n = 790; 9.2%), antidepressant (n = 659; 7.7%), antibiotic/antifungal (n = 77; 0.90%), antiepileptics (n = 17; 0.2%) and immunosuppressant medications (n = 19; 0.2%). Patients on an interacting medication were more likely to receive a lower dose of DOAC than indicated by the manufacturer's labeling (15.0% vs 11.4%, p <0.0001). In multivariable analysis, co-prescription of an enzyme inhibitor was not associated with risk of any bleeding (hazard ratio 0.87 [0.71 to 1.05], p = 0.15) or stroke, transient ischemic attack, or systemic embolism (hazard ratio 0.82 [0.51 to 1.31], p = 0.39). In conclusion, DOACs are co-prescribed with medications with potential interactions in 30.4% of patients with AF. Co-prescription of DOACs and these drugs are not associated with increased risk of adverse embolic or bleeding outcomes in our cohort.

Comparison of potential pharmacokinetic drug interactions in patients with atrial fibrillation and changing from warfarin to non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant therapy

There are now anticoagulant choices with proposed advantages of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) over warfarin being less routine monitoring and less drug interactions. Interacting medication can impact the efficacy and safety of anticoagulant therapy with management remaining clinically challenging. There have been limited studies comparing the potential for pharmacokinetic (PK) drug interactions between different anticoagulants. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare potential PK interactions in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) changing from warfarin to NOAC therapy. A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients with AF enrolled in a dedicated warfarin program but exiting this program to commence a NOAC. Patient data was collected, and concurrent medications were utilised to identify potential PK drug interactions with both warfarin and the chosen NOAC therapy. Patients were grouped according to the number of medications with potential PK interactions and comparisons made between groups. Of the 712 eligible patients who ceased warfarin to commence a NOAC, most commenced either apixaban (45.9%) or rivaroxaban (41.9%). When comparing warfarin to NOACs, there were significant differences in the proportion of patients taking no medication with potential PK drug interactions (46.9% vs 62.8%, p < 0.0001), and taking one (35.2% vs 28.5%, p = 0.0067) and two (14.5% vs 7.3%, p < 0.0001) potentially PK interacting medications. This study found when patients with AF were switched from warfarin to a NOAC, the potential for PK drug interactions significantly reduced but remained around 40%. Identifying and managing potential PK drug interactions with NOACs remains a priority to optimise clinical benefit of these anticoagulants.

Edoxaban and the Issue of Drug-Drug Interactions: From Pharmacology to Clinical Practice

Edoxaban, a direct factor Xa inhibitor, is the latest of the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs). Despite being marketed later than other NOACs, its use is now spreading in current clinical practice, being indicated for both thromboprophylaxis in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and for the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE). In patients with multiple conditions, the contemporary administration of several drugs can cause relevant drug-drug interactions (DDIs), which can affect drugs' pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Usually, all the NOACs are considered to have significantly fewer DDIs than vitamin K antagonists; notwithstanding, this is actually not true, all of them are affected by DDIs with drugs that can influence the activity (induction or inhibition) of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and cytochrome P450 3A4, both responsible for the disposition and metabolism of NOACs to a different extent. In this review/expert opinion, we focused on an extensive report of edoxaban DDIs. All the relevant drugs categories have been examined to report on significant DDIs, discussing the impact on edoxaban pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, and the evidence for dose adjustment. Our analysis found that, despite a restrained number of interactions, some strong inhibitors/inducers of P-gp and drug-metabolising enzymes can affect edoxaban concentration, just as it happens with other NOACs, implying the need for a dose adjustment. However, our analysis of edoxaban DDIs suggests that given the small propensity for interactions of this agent, its use represents an acceptable clinical decision. Still, DDIs can be significant in certain clinical situations and a careful evaluation is always needed when prescribing NOACs.

Evaluation of Anti-Xa Apixaban and Rivaroxaban Levels With Respect to Known Doses in Relation to Major Bleeding Events

BACKGROUND

Although not routinely recommended, anti-Xa level monitoring for apixaban or rivaroxaban may be useful in certain clinical scenarios. There are currently no laboratory standards, therapeutic ranges, or proven correlation between anti-Xa levels and clinical outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

This study describes the utilization, application, and association of anti-Xa levels with clinical outcomes in patients receiving apixaban or rivaroxaban.

METHODS

This retrospective, descriptive study included adult inpatients within the Houston Methodist System on apixaban or rivaroxaban with at least one anti-Xa level ordered subsequent to administered doses. The primary endpoint was major bleeding according to International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria. Secondary endpoints included reasons for anti-Xa level ordering, anti-Xa levels at different time intervals post-dose, and thrombotic events. Pre-specified subgroup analyses were performed to further evaluate the primary endpoint.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 169 patients and 234 anti-Xa levels. Twenty-nine levels were obtained in context of major bleeding. The majority of levels were not drawn as peak levels 2-4 hours post-dose, however remained quantifiable above typical observed levels within this timeframe and well beyond 24 hours post-dose. Patient characteristics with major bleeding included elderly age, acute renal impairment, and low body weight. At least 14 unique reasons for anti-Xa level ordering were identified. Twenty-nine levels were associated with thrombotic events.

CONCLUSION

Anti-Xa levels may be useful for assessment of current drug concentrations, immediate safety of therapy, and guidance for possible clinical interventions. Dose titration and reversal therapies based on anti-Xa level results in major bleeding warrant further research.

Effect of Enzyme-Inducing Antiseizure Medications on the Risk of Sub-Therapeutic Concentrations of Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Stroke and thromboembolic events occurring among patients taking direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been associated with low concentrations of DOACs. Enzyme-inducing antiseizure medications (EI-ASMs) are associated with enhanced cytochrome-P450-mediated metabolism and enhanced P-glycoprotein-mediated transport.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of concomitant EI-ASM use on DOAC peak concentrations in patients treated in clinical care.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients treated with DOACs for atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolic disease in an academic general hospital. In total, 307 patients treated with DOACs between August 2015 and January 2020 were reviewed. Clinical characteristics and peak DOAC plasma concentrations of patients co-treated with an EI-ASM were compared with those of patients not treated with an EI-ASM. An apixaban dose score (ADS) was defined to account for apixaban dosage and the number of apixaban dose-reduction criteria.

RESULTS

In total, 177 peak DOAC plasma concentrations (including apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran) from 131 patients were measured, including 24 patients co-treated with an EI-ASM and 107 controls not treated with an EI-ASM. The proportion of patients with DOAC concentrations below the expected range was significantly higher among EI-ASM users than among patients not taking an EI-ASM (37.5 vs. 9.3%, respectively; p = 0.0004; odds ratio 5.82; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.03-16.66). Most of these patients were treated with apixaban (85%); however, sensitivity analysis results were also significant (p = 0.031) for patients with non-apixaban DOACs. In patients co-treated with apixaban and an EI-ASM, median apixaban peak concentration was 106 ng/mL (interquartile range [IQR] 71-181) compared with 150 ng/mL (IQR 94-222) in controls (p = 0.019). In multivariable analysis, EI-ASM use was associated with 6.26-fold increased odds for apixaban concentration below the expected range (95% CI 2.19-17.90; p = 0.001). Apixaban concentrations were significantly associated with EI-ASM use, moderate enzyme inhibitor use, and ADS.

CONCLUSIONS

Concurrent EI-ASM and DOAC use presents a possible risk for DOAC concentrations below the expected range. The clinical significance of the interaction is currently unclear.

Drug interactions and pharmacogenetic factors contribute to variation in apixaban concentration in atrial fibrillation patients in routine care

Factor Xa-inhibitor apixaban is an oral anticoagulant prescribed in atrial fibrillation (AF) for stroke prevention. Its pharmacokinetic profile is known to be affected by cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A metabolism, while it is also a substrate of the efflux transporters ATP-binding cassette (ABC)B1 (P-glycoprotein) and ABCG2 (breast cancer resistance protein, BCRP). In this study, we assessed the impact of interacting medication and pharmacogenetic variation to better explain apixaban concentration differences among 358 Caucasian AF patients. Genotyping (ABCG2, ABCB1, CYP3A4*22, CYP3A5*3) was performed by TaqMan assays, and apixaban quantified by mass spectrometry. The typical patient was on average 77.2 years old, 85.5 kg, and had a serum creatinine of 103.1 µmol/L. Concomitant amiodarone, an antiarrhythmic agent and moderate CYP3A/ABCB1 inhibitor, the impaired-function variant ABCG2 c.421C > A, and sex predicted higher apixaban concentrations when controlling for age, weight and serum creatinine (multivariate regression; R² = 0.34). Our findings suggest that amiodarone and ABCG2 genotype contribute to interpatient apixaban variability beyond known clinical factors.

Uninterrupted direct oral anticoagulant treatment during acute illness: Impact on clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND

Uninterrupted drug therapy during acute illness is often associated with pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variations. Among warfarin treated patients, these changes are reflected in the INR. However, in the case of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), given that routine laboratory monitoring is not recommended, these changes may result in unforeseen thromboembolic or bleeding events.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the rate of thromboembolic (TEE) and bleeding events associated with uninterrupted DOAC compared to warfarin treatment during acute illness.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of patients treated with DOACs or warfarin, both at steady state, who were hospitalized for acute illness. Primary outcome was any TEE or major bleeding requiring re-hospitalization within one month from discharge. Secondary outcome was a composite of major bleeding and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) events.

RESULTS

A total of 410 patients continued oral anticoagulant treatment during their hospitalization, of whom 191 (46.6%) were on DOACs and 219 (53.4%) on warfarin, with a total of 18 (4.4%) events. Rates of TEE and major bleeding events did not differ between DOACs and warfarin treated patients (0.9% vs. 0.5% and 0.5% vs. 1%, respectively). Similarly, rate of secondary outcome was comparable between DOACs (4.7%) and warfarin (2.7%, p = 0.29). Sub-analyses demonstrated significantly higher rates among rivaroxaban (10.4%) treated patients compared to warfarin (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Uninterrupted treatment with DOACs during acute illness is not associated with increased risk for re-hospitalizations due to bleeding or thromboembolic events compared to warfarin. Our results suggest a higher bleeding rate among rivaroxaban treated patients at high bleeding risk.

Drug-drug interactions with direct oral anticoagulants associated with adverse events in the real world: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have emerged as safe and effective alternatives to Vitamin-K antagonists for treatment and prevention of arterial and venous thrombosis. Due to their novelty, pharmacokinetic DOAC drug-drug interactions (DDIs) that result in clinical adverse events have not been well-documented.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to systematically review reported pharmacokinetic DDIs resulting in clinical adverse events through documented observational evidence to better inform clinicians in clinical practice.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature review of EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Ovid HealthStar was conducted through March 10th, 2020. Two independent reviewers screened and extracted data from eligible articles according to pre-established inclusion and exclusion criteria. Articles reporting bleeding or thrombotic outcomes in non-controlled (observational) settings resulting from suggested pharmacokinetic DOAC DDIs were included.

RESULTS

A total of 5567 citations were reviewed, of which 24 were included following data extraction. The majority were case reports (n = 21) documenting a single adverse event resulting from a suspected DOAC DDI, while the remaining papers were a case series (n = 1) and cohort studies (n = 2). The most commonly reported interacting drugs were amiodarone and ritonavir (bleeding), and phenobarbital, phenytoin, and carbamazepine (thrombosis). Bleeding events more often resulted from a combined mechanism (P-glycoprotein AND CYP3A4 inhibition), whereas thrombotic events resulted from either combined OR single P-glycoprotein/CYP3A4 induction.

CONCLUSION

Current literature evaluating the real-world risk of DOAC DDIs is limited to few case reports and retrospective observational analyses. Clinicians are encouraged to continue to report suspected drug interactions resulting in adverse events.

Real-World Analysis of Potential Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Drug Interactions with Apixaban in Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation

Purpose

We conducted this study to assess the real-world prevalence, nature, predictors, and clinical necessity of apixaban pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) drug interactions in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) at a tertiary medical institution in Saudi Arabia.

Patients and Methods

An observational retrospective cohort analysis was conducted in adult patients diagnosed with NVAF receiving apixaban for stroke prevention from the period of June 2015 to May 2019.

Results

Of the 1271 patients included in the analysis, 611 (48.1%) patients had potential PD– or PK–drug interactions with apixaban. Of those, 490 (38.6%) patients had potential PD drug–drug interactions (DDIs) and 121 (9.5%) patients had potential PK-DDIs. PD-DDIs with apixaban were mainly with antiplatelet therapy followed by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and antidepressants. PK-DDIs with apixaban were mainly with combined P-gp/CYP3A4 inhibitors or inducers. History of minor bleeding was positively correlated with PD-DDIs with apixaban, ß coefficient = 0.455 (OR 1.58; 95% CI 1.01–2.45); p<0.05. History of acute coronary syndrome was positively correlated with PD-DDIs with apixaban, ß coefficient = 0.515 (OR 1.60; 95% CI 1.36–1.99); p<0.05. History of heart failure was positively correlated with PK-DDIs with apixaban, ß coefficient = 0.459 (OR 1.58; 95% CI 1.07–2.35); p<0.05. Almost 15% of the included patients had no clinical indication to receive the potential interacting drug with apixaban and about 20% of them were assuming an inappropriate apixaban dose according to the product package insert.

Conclusion

Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics interactions are common in more than half of the patients with NVAF receiving apixaban for stroke prevention in this real-world analysis. Some of these interacting medications are not indicated. Drug–drug interactions should always be considered and monitored with apixaban with a regular assessment of the need for any interacting medication.