The safety and efficacy of systemic versus catheter-based therapies: application of a prognostic model by a pulmonary embolism response team

Outcome of Patients With Cancer-Associated Pulmonary Embolism: Results From the Regional Pulmonary Embolism Registry

BACKGROUND

Newly or already diagnosed cancer might significantly influence the clinical presentation, outcome, and therapy of acute pulmonary embolism (PE).

METHODS

Out of 1745 patients with acute PE, 66 patients were diagnosed with cancer during an initial hospitalization due to acute PE (where PE was the first clinical manifestation of cancer), 165 patients had known cancer treated in the last 6 months, and 1514 patients had acute PE without known or suspected cancer. The primary end-point of the present study was all-cause hospital death. The secondary end-points were the proportion of patients treated with thrombolysis and who had severe disease, and the ocurrence of major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding.

RESULTS

Patients with PE as the first presentation of cancer had the highest hospital mortality rate compared to the other two groups (HR for the mortality rate in patients without cancer as a reference, adjusted to four-stratum mortality risk, and Charlson's comorbidity index was 3.440; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.795-6.591; p < 0.001). Patients with known cancer before PE had a significantly lower chance of being treated with thrombolysis than patients without cancer (OR, 0.523; 95% CI, 0.339-0.807; p = 0.003); additionally, this difference was attenuated but remained when the OR was adjusted to age (OR, 0.542; 95% CI, 0.351-0.838; p = 0.006). Patients with known cancer had a higher frequency of high-risk PE compared with patients without cancer (18.2% vs. 12.8%; p < 0.001). Patients with PE as the first manifestation of cancer had a higher frequency of intermediate-high-risk PE than those without (36.4% vs. 30.9%; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in bleeding during hospitalization between groups.

CONCLUSION

Patients with cancer had a more severe presentation of acute PE than patients without. Furthermore, patients with PE as the first manifestation of cancer had the highest hospital mortality rate, and patients with known cancer were least likely to be treated with thrombolysis.

Can GRACE Risk Score Predict Mortality and the Need for Thrombolytic Treatment in Acute Pulmonary Embolism?

Acute coronary syndrome and pulmonary embolism (PE) are clinical entities sharing similar presentation and risk factors. Risk scores and indexes help to identify disease severity in both diseases. In this study, we aimed to evaluate if the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk score could predict 30-day mortality and the need for thrombolytic treatment in patients with acute PE. Patients hospitalized with a diagnosis of PE in our tertiary center between January 2018 and May 2022 were included in this retrospective study. Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) and GRACE risk scores on admission were calculated using clinical, electrocardiographic, and laboratory parameters for each patient. A total of 197 patients were included. The 30-day mortality rate was 28.4% whereas 32.5% of the patients required thrombolytic treatment. GRACE and PESI scores were found independent risk factors associated with 30-day mortality and the need for thrombolytic treatment. A cut-off value of 160.5 for GRACE score was associated with 88.5% sensitivity and 89.4% specificity in prediction of 30-day mortality. In contrast, GRACE score had 61.0% sensitivity and 60.0% specificity in the prediction of the need for thrombolytic treatment when the cut-off value was 147. In conclusion, GRACE risk score has an effective discriminating power in determining the early mortality of patients with acute PE. The incidence of short-term PE-related mortality was significantly increased in patients with high GRACE risk scores. Concomitant use of GRACE and PESI risk scores may aid in defining patients with high-risk PE and help predict poor prognosis with high specificity and probability.

Implementing a Pediatric Pulmonary Embolism Response Team Model: An Institutional Experience

Pulmonary embolism is increasing in prevalence among pediatric patients; although still rare, it can create a significant risk for morbidity and death within the pediatric patient population. Pulmonary embolism presents in various ways depending on the patient, the size of the embolism, and the comorbidities. Treatment decisions are often driven by the severity of the presentation and hemodynamic effects; severe presentations require more invasive and aggressive treatment. We describe the development and implementation of a pediatric pulmonary embolism response team designed to facilitate rapid, multidisciplinary, data-driven treatment decisions and management.

Pulmonary Embolism in the Cancer Associated Thrombosis Landscape

In cancer patients, pulmonary embolism (PE) is the second leading cause of death after the cancer itself, most likely because of difficulties in diagnosing the disease due to its nonclassical presentation. The risk of PE recurrence and possibly the case-fatality rate depends on whether the patient presents a symptomatic PE, an unsuspected PE, a subsegmental PE, or a catheter-related PE. Choosing the best therapeutic option is challenging and should consider the risk of both the recurrence of thrombosis and the occurrence of bleeding. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the clinical characteristics and the treatment of cancer-associated PE, which could benefit clinicians to better manage the deadliest form of thrombosis associated with cancer. After a brief presentation of the epidemiological data, we will present the current attitude towards the diagnosis and the management of cancer patients with PE. Finally, we will discuss the perspectives of how the medical community can improve the management of this severe medical condition.