Unexpected mutations were expected and unrelated to CRISPR-Cas9 activity

Knockdown resistance allele L1014F introduced by CRISPR/Cas9 is not associated with altered vector competence of Anopheles gambiae for o'nyong nyong virus

Knockdown resistance (kdr) alleles conferring resistance to pyrethroid insecticides are widespread amongst vector populations. Previous research has suggested that these alleles are associated with changes in the vector competence of mosquitoes for arboviruses and Plasmodium, however non-target genetic differences between mosquito strains may have had a confounding effect. Here, to minimise genetic differences, the laboratory Anopheles gambiae Kisumu strain was compared to a CRISPR/Cas9 homozygous kdr L1014F mutant Kisumu-kdr line in order to examine associations with vector competence for o'nyong nyong virus (ONNV). Mosquitoes were infected using either blood feeds or intrathoracic microinjections. There were no significant differences in the prevalence of virus in mosquito body parts between kdr mutant and wildtype lines from either oral or intrathoracic injection routes. The ONNV titre was significantly higher in the legs of the wildtype strain at 7dpi following intrathoracic microinjection, but no other significant differences in viral titre were detected. ONNV was not detected in the saliva of mosquitoes from either strain. Our findings from per os infections suggest that the kdr L1014F allele is not associated with altered infection prevalence for ONNV, a key component of vector competence.

Importing genetically altered animals: ensuring quality

The reproducibility of research using laboratory animals requires reliable management of their quality, in particular of their genetics, health and environment, all of which contribute to their phenotypes. The point at which these biological materials are transferred between researchers is particularly sensitive, as it may result in a loss of integrity of the animals and/or their documentation. Here, we describe the various aspects of laboratory animal quality that should be confirmed when sharing rodent research models. We also discuss how repositories of biological materials support the scientific community to ensure the continuity of the quality of laboratory animals. Both the concept of quality and the role of repositories themselves extend to all exchanges of biological materials and all networks that support the sharing of these reagents.

Orthogonal arrays of particle assembly are essential for normal aquaporin-4 expression level in the brain

Astrocyte endfeet are endowed with aquaporin-4 (AQP4)-based assemblies called orthogonal arrays of particles (OAPs) whose function is still unclear. To investigate the function of OAPs and of AQP4 tetramers, we have generated a novel "OAP-null" mouse model selectively lacking the OAP forming M23-AQP4 isoform. We demonstrated that AQP4 transcript levels were not reduced by using qPCR. Blue native (BN)/SDS-PAGE and Western blot performed on OAP-null brain and primary astrocyte cultures showed the complete depletion of AQP4 assemblies, the selective expression of M1-AQP4-based tetramers, and a substantial reduction in AQP4 total expression level. Fluorescence quenching and super-resolution microscopy experiments showed that AQP4 tetramers were functionally expressed in astrocyte plasma membrane and their dimensions were reduced compared to wild-type assemblies. Finally, as shown by light and electron microscopy, OAP depletion resulted in a massive reduction in AQP4 expression and a loss of perivascular AQP4 staining at astrocyte endfeet, with only sparse labeling throughout the brain areas analyzed. Our study relies on the unique property of AQP4 to form OAPs, using a novel OAP-null mouse model for the first time, to show that (a) AQP4 assembly is essential for normal AQP4 expression level in the brain and (b) most of AQP4 is organized into OAPs under physiological conditions. Therefore, AQP4 tetramers cannot be used by astrocytes as an alternative to OAPs without affecting AQP4 expression levels, which is important in the physiological and pathological conditions in which OAP aggregation/disaggregation dynamics have been implicated.

CRISPR in livestock: From editing to printing

Precise genome editing of large animals applied to livestock and biomedicine is nowadays possible since the CRISPR revolution. This review summarizes the latest advances and the main technical issues that determine the success of this technology. The pathway from editing to printing, from engineering the genome to achieving the desired animals, does not always imply an easy, fast and safe journey. When applied in large animals, CRISPR involves time- and cost-consuming projects, and it is mandatory not only to choose the best approach for genome editing, but also for embryo production, zygote microinjection or electroporation, cryopreservation and embryo transfer. The main technical refinements and most frequent questions to improve this disruptive biotechnology in large animals are presented. In addition, we discuss some CRISPR applications to enhance livestock production in the context of a growing global demand of food, in terms of increasing efficiency, reducing the impact of farming on the environment, enhancing pest control, animal welfare and health. The challenge is no longer technical. Controversies and consensus, opportunities and threats, benefits and risks, ethics and science should be reconsidered to enter into the CRISPR era.

CRISPR/Cas9 engineering of albino cystinuria Type A mice

Cystinuria Type A is a relatively common genetic kidney disease occurring in 1 in 7,000 people worldwide that results from mutation of the cystine transporter rBAT encoded by Slc3a1. We used CRISPR/Cas9 technology to engineer cystinuria Type A mice via genome editing of the C57BL/6NHsd background. These mice are an improvement on currently available models as they are on a coisogenic genetic background and have a single defined mutation. In order to use albinism to track Cas9 activity, we co-injected gRNAs targeting Slc3a1 and tyrosinase (Tyr) with Cas9 expressing plasmid DNA into mouse embryos. Two different Slc3a1 mutational alleles were derived, with homozygous mice of both demonstrating elevated urinary cystine levels, cystine crystals, and bladder stones. We used whole genome sequencing to evaluate for potential off-target editing. No off-target indels were observed for the top 10 predicted off-targets for Slc3a1 or Tyr. Therefore, we used CRISPR/Cas9 to generate coisogenic albino cystinuria Type A mice that could be used for in vivo imaging, further study, or developing new treatments of cystinuria.

The History of Transgenesis

A transgenic mouse carries within its genome an artificial DNA construct (transgene) that is deliberately introduced by an experimentalist. These animals are widely used to understand gene function and protein function. When addressing the history of transgenic mouse technology, it is apparent that a number of basic science research areas laid the groundwork for success. These include reproductive science, genetics and molecular biology, and micromanipulation and microscopy equipment. From reproductive physiology came applications on how to optimize mouse breeding, how to superovulate mice to produce zygotes for DNA microinjection or preimplantation embryos for combination with embryonic stem (ES) cells, and how to return zygotes and embryos to a pseudopregnant surrogate dam for gestation and birth. From developmental biology, it was learned how to micromanipulate embryos for morula aggregation and blastocyst microinjection and how to establish germline competent ES cells. From genetics came the foundational principles governing the inheritance of genes, the interactions of gene products, and an understanding of the phenotypic consequences of genetic mutations. From molecular biology came a panoply of tools and reagents that are used to clone DNA transgenes, to detect the presence of transgenes, to assess gene expression by measuring transcription, and to detect proteins in cells and tissues. Technical advances in light microscopes, micromanipulators, micropipette pullers, and ancillary equipment made it possible for experimentalists to insert thin glass needles into zygotes or embryos under controlled conditions to inject DNA solutions or ES cells. To fully discuss the breadth of contributions of these numerous scientific disciplines to a comprehensive history of transgenic science is beyond the scope of this work. Examples will be used to illustrate scientific developments central to the foundation of transgenic technology and that are in use today.