The effect of sildenafil citrate and pentoxifylline combined treatment in the management of erectile dysfunction

Treatment of Poor Sperm Quality and Erectile Dysfunction With Oral Pentoxifylline: A Systematic Review

Background: Pentoxifylline (PTX) is a member of methylxanthine chemicals and a type of non-selective phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors, which has been used in male infertility treatment to improve sperm quality and erectile dysfunction (ED) treatment. Mutually tight associations existed between ED and male infertility. Using PTX might kill two birds with one stone by improving sperm quality and erectile function in infertile men with ED. Methods: PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched by October 2021. Based on available evidence from observational studies and randomized-controlled trials (RCTs), we conducted a systematic review to summarize the efficacy and safety of PTX in treating ED and male infertility. The protocol of the article was registered and updated in PROSPERO (CRD42021291396). Results: From 202 records, eight studies (7 RCTs) evaluating the role of PTX in ED and three studies (2 RCTs) assessing the efficacy of PTX in male infertility were included in the systematic review. Three studies (100.00%) and two studies (100.00%) reported the beneficial role of PTX in improving sperm progressive motility and normal sperm morphology rate, respectively. In contrast, only one study (33.33%) indicated the favorable role of PTX in enhancing sperm concentration. As for ED, three (60.00%) studies supported the treatment role of PTX alone in ED, and two studies (66.67%) favored the combination use of PTX and selective PDE5Is compared with selective PDE5Is alone. Safety analysis showed that PTX was a well-tolerated drug in ED and male infertility treatment. Conclusion: Given the association between ED and male infertility and satisfying findings from available evidence, PTX administration for the simultaneous treatment of poor sperm quality and mild ED in infertile men will highly enhance the treatment compliance. However, the finding should be treated carefully until validated by further studies.

Assessment of Combination Therapies vs Monotherapy for Erectile Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

IMPORTANCE

Combining 2 first-line treatments for erectile dysfunction (ED) or initiating other modalities in addition to a first-line therapy may produce beneficial outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether different ED combination therapies were associated with improved outcomes compared with first-line ED monotherapy in various subgroups of patients with ED.

DATA SOURCES

Studies were identified through a systematic search in MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Scopus from inception of these databases to October 10, 2020.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized clinical trials or prospective interventional studies of the outcomes of combination therapy vs recommended monotherapy in men with ED were identified. Only comparative human studies, which evaluated the change from baseline of self-reported erectile function using validated questionnaires, that were published in any language were included.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Data extraction and synthesis were performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

A meta-analysis was conducted that included randomized clinical trials that compared outcomes of combination therapy with phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors plus another agent vs PDE5 inhibitor monotherapy. Separate analyses were performed for the mean International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) score change from baseline and the number of adverse events (AEs) by different treatment modalities and subgroups of patients.

RESULTS

A total of 44 studies included 3853 men with a mean (SD) age of 55.8 (11.9) years. Combination therapy compared with monotherapy was associated with a mean IIEF score improvement of 1.76 points (95% CI, 1.27-2.24; I2 = 77%; 95% PI, -0.56 to 4.08). Adding daily tadalafil, low-intensity shockwave therapy, vacuum erectile device, folic acid, metformin hydrochloride, or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors was associated with a significant IIEF score improvement, but each measure was based on only 1 study. Specifically, the weighted mean difference (WMD) in IIEF score was 1.70 (95% CI, 0.79-2.61) for the addition of daily tadalafil, 3.50 (95% CI, 0.22-6.78) for the addition of low-intensity shockwave therapy, 8.40 (95% CI, 4.90-11.90) for the addition of a vacuum erectile device, 3.46 (95% CI, 2.16-4.76) for the addition of folic acid, 4.90 (95% CI, 2.82-6.98) for the addition of metformin hydrochloride and 2.07 (95% CI, 1.37-2.77) for the addition of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. The addition of α-blockers to PDE5 inhibitors was not associated with improvement in IIEF score (WMD, 0.80; 95% CI, -0.06 to 1.65; I2 = 72%). Compared with monotherapy, combination therapy was associated with improved IIEF score in patients with hypogonadism (WMD, 1.61; 95% CI, 0.99-2.23; I2 = 0%), monotherapy-resistant ED (WMD, 4.38; 95% CI, 2.37-6.40; I2 = 52%), or prostatectomy-induced ED (WMD, 5.47; 95% CI, 3.11-7.83; I2 = 53%). The treatment-related AEs did not differ between combination therapy and monotherapy (odds ratio, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.66-1.85; I2 = 78%). Despite multiple subgroup and sensitivity analyses, the levels of heterogeneity remained high.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study found that combination therapy of PDE5 inhibitors and antioxidants was associated with improved ED without increasing the AEs. Treatment with PDE5 inhibitors and daily tadalafil, shockwaves, or a vacuum device was associated with additional improvement, but this result was based on limited data. These findings suggest that combination therapy is safe, associated with improved outcomes, and should be considered as a first-line therapy for refractory, complex, or difficult-to-treat cases of ED.

A Small Group Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Daily Pentoxifylline in the Management of Patients With Erectile Dysfunction with Suboptimal Treatment Response to Sildenafil

Introduction

Several studies have reaffirmed the use of regular pentoxifylline therapy in increasing the penile brachial pressure index in men affected by erectile dysfunction when compared to placebo.

Aim

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of pentoxifylline as an adjunctive treatment for patients with erectile dysfunction.

Methods

This study was a single center, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Subjects were recruited between April 2014 and November 2016 from the National University Hospital, Singapore. The combination therapy group was given pentoxifylline 400 mg thrice daily orally and the monotherapy group was given placebo capsules thrice daily orally. Both groups continued their on-demand 100 mg sildenafil. The treatment duration was 8 weeks. Efficacy was measured via the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) questionnaire at the eighth week. Differences in mean IIEF-5 score and the domains of the IIEF at 8 weeks between the 2 treatment groups were compared using independent sample t-test.

Main Outcome Measure

Baseline IIEF-5 and the IIEF-15 score vs post-therapy IIEF-5 and the IIEF-15 score.

Results

50 patients were randomized into 2 groups. Patients in the 2 groups were comparable in terms of the demographic and clinical characteristics, comorbidities, and baseline IIEF-5 scores. The mean IIEF-5 score post-therapy of the combination therapy group vs the monotherapy group was 14.11 and 14.87, respectively. There was no significant difference between the outcomes of these 2 groups (unadjusted mean difference -0.76; 95% CI -4.01 to 2.49; P = .641) and the outcomes are the same even after adjusting for baseline IIEF-5 scores. There was a significant improvement in the “overall satisfaction” portion of the IIEF score for the combination therapy group as compared to the monotherapy group (unadjusted mean difference 0.12; 95% CI -1.49 to 1.25) and even after adjustment for baseline scores (adjusted mean difference 1.11; 95% CI 0.10 to 2.12; P = .032) the improvement is significant.

Conclusion

Our trial suggests that the use of combination therapy does not improve the management of patients compared to monotherapy.

Law YXT, Tai BC, Tan YQ et al. A Small Group Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Daily Pentoxifylline in the Management of Patients With Erectile Dysfunction with Suboptimal Treatment Response to Sildenafil. Sex Med 2019;8:14–20.

Does pentoxifylline enhance the recovery of erectile function after a T-shunt procedure for prolonged ischaemic priapism? A prospective randomised controlled trial

Objective

To evaluate the role of oral pentoxifylline for enhancing the recovery of erectile function (EF) in patients who had a T-shunt, a technically simple procedure for treating prolonged ischaemic priapism, as the recovery of EF has been reported in many patients treated by this procedure.

Patients and methods

This prospective randomised study was conducted on 40 patients with prolonged ischaemic priapism treated with a T-shunt. Patients were randomly divided into two groups; group A received oral pentoxifylline from the second day after surgery for 3 months, and group B received placebo. Patients were followed for 18 months.

Results

The pain resolved in all patients, and EF recovered in 15 patients in group A and 10 in group B within 3 months. All patients but three had recovery of EF within the 18-month follow-up. Six patients had recovery of EF by using on-demand 50 mg sildenafil. The three patients who did not recover EF had a penile prosthesis implanted after the end of the study.

Conclusion

Pentoxifylline had no significant effect on the recovery of EF after a T-shunt procedure, but a larger study (double-blinded) is required for a more accurate assessment of any beneficial effect of pentoxifylline after a T-shunt procedure.

TNF-α, erectile dysfunction, and NADPH oxidase-mediated ROS generation in corpus cavernosum in high-fat diet/streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats

INTRODUCTION

Patients with diabetes-associated erectile dysfunction (ED) are characterized by an increase in circulating tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α). However, no study has indicated whether and how TNF-α plays a role in the pathogenesis of ED associated with diabetes.

AIM

We examined the effects and potential mechanism of infliximab (INF), a chimeric monoclonal antibody to TNF-α, on reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation in corpus cavernosum and ED in diabetic rats.

METHODS

Four groups of male rats were used: age-matched normal controls; diabetic rats induced by a high-fat diet (HFD) combined with a single streptozotocin (STZ) injection (35 mg/kg body weight, intraperitoneal [i.p.]); nondiabetic rats receiving INF (5 mg/kg body weight/week, i.p.), and diabetic rats receiving INF. Erectile function was assessed with electrical stimulation of the cavernous nerve after 8 weeks. The blood and penile tissues were harvested for plasma biochemical determinations, serum TNF-α measurement, penile ROS detection, and molecular assays of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase subunits, endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS), phospho-eNOS, and neural nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) in the penis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The effect of INF on HFD/STZ-induced diabetic ED and NADPH oxidase-mediated ROS generation was studied in diabetic corpus cavernosum.

RESULTS

Untreated diabetic rats displayed significantly decreased erectile parameters, and increased plasma TNF-α levels, penile ROS production, p47(phox) and gp91(phox) expression compared with nondiabetic controls. INF neutralized TNF-α and significantly reduced ED in diabetic rats, in which marked decreases in p47(phox) and gp91(phox) expression and ROS generation in corpus cavernosum were noted. The ratio of phospho-eNOS to eNOS and expression of nNOS in the penis were significantly increased in INF-treated vs. untreated diabetic rats.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased TNF-α expression associated with diabetes contributes to ED by promoting NAPDH oxidase-mediated ROS generation in corpus cavernosum. INF protects against diabetic ED by neutralizing TNF-α.

Combination therapy for erectile dysfunction: an update review

The introduction of oral phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE5Is) in the late 1990s and early 2000s revolutionized the field of sexual medicine and PDE5Is are currently first-line monotherapy for erectile dysfunction (ED). However, a significant proportion of patients with complex ED will be therapeutic non-responders to PDE5I monotherapy. Combination therapy has recently been adopted for more refractory cases of ED, but a critical evaluation of current combination therapies is lacking. A thorough PubMed and Cochrane Library search was conducted focusing on the effectiveness of combination therapies for ED in therapeutic non-responders to PDE5I therapy. Journal articles spanning the time period between January 1990 and December 2010 were reviewed. Criteria included all pertinent review articles, randomized controlled trials, cohort studies and retrospective analyses. References from retrieved articles were also manually scanned for additional relevant publications. Published combination therapies include PDE5I plus vacuum erectile device (VED), intraurethral medication, intracavernosal injection (ICI), androgen supplement, α-blocker or miscellaneous combinations. Based on this review, some of these combination treatments appeared to be quite effective in preliminary testing. Caution must be advised, however, as the majority of combination therapy articles in the last decade have numerous limitations including study biases and small subject size. Regardless of limitations, present combination therapy research provides a solid foundation for future studies in complex ED management.

Pentoxifylline promotes recovery of erectile function in a rat model of postprostatectomy erectile dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Cavernous nerve (CN) injury during radical prostatectomy (RP) causes CN degeneration and secondary penile fibrosis and smooth muscle cell (SMC) apoptosis. Pentoxifylline (PTX) is a phosphodiesterase inhibitor that further inhibits multiple cytokine pathways involved in nerve degeneration, apoptosis, and fibrosis.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether PTX enhances erectile function in a rat model of CN injury. DESIGN, SETTING AND INTERVENTIONS: Forty male Sprague-Dawley rats underwent CN crush injury and were randomized to oral gavage feeding of phosphate-buffered saline (vehicle) or PTX 25, PTX 50, or PTX 100 mg/kg per day. Ten animals underwent sham surgery and received vehicle treatment. Treatment continued for 28 d, followed by a wash-out period of 72 h. An additional eight rats underwent resection of the major pelvic ganglion (MPG) for tissue culture and examination of direct effects of PTX on neurite sprouting.

MEASUREMENTS

Intracavernous pressure recording on CN electrostimulation, immunohistologic examination of the penis and the CN distal to the injury site, and length of neurite sprouts in MPG culture.

RESULTS

Daily oral gavage feeding of PTX resulted in significant improvement of erectile function compared to vehicle treatment in all treated groups. After treatment with PTX 50 and PTX 100 mg/kg per day, the expression of neuronal nitric oxide synthase in the dorsal penile nerve was significantly higher than in vehicle-treated rats. Furthermore, PTX treatment prevented collagen deposition and SMC loss in the corpus cavernosum. In the CN, signs of Wallerian degeneration were ameliorated by PTX treatment. MPG culture in medium containing PTX resulted in a significant increase of neurite length.

CONCLUSIONS

PTX treatment following CN injury in rats improved erectile recovery, enhanced nerve regeneration, and preserved the corpus cavernosum microarchitecture. The clinical availability of this compound merits application in penile rehabilitation studies following RP in the near future.