Reinforcement of the Triple D score with simple addition of the intrarenal location for the prediction of the stone-free rate after shockwave lithotripsy for renal stones 10-20 mm in diameter

Predictive performance of Triple-D, Quadruple-D, and Mayo adhesive probability scores in ESWL for renal stones: a retrospective cohort study

This study aimed to compare the predictive performance of Triple-D, Quadruple-D, and Mayo Adhesive Probability (MAP) scoring systems in estimating stone-free (SF) status following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in patients with renal stones. This retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients who underwent ESWL between January 2020 and January 2024. Pre-treatment non-contrast computed tomography was used to assess stone characteristics and calculate Triple-D, Quadruple-D, and MAP scores. Patients were categorized into stone-free (SF) and residual stone (RS) groups based on imaging performed three months after treatment. Residual fragments of < 4 mm were defined as SF. The study included 198 patients (60.6% male; mean age 45.5 ± 13.1 years). According to logistic regression analysis, a low MAP score (< 2.5) was the strongest independent predictor of SF status (OR: 15.5; 95% CI: 5.1-47.1; p < 0.001), followed by a high Quadruple-D score (> 1.5) (OR: 7.4; 95% CI: 2.2-24.1; p = 0.001) and low stone density (< 600 HU) (OR: 4.9; 95% CI: 1.1-21.8; p = 0.037). Conversely, a higher number of shockwaves and the need for additional procedures were associated with RS (both p < 0.001). Among the scoring systems, MAP score demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy with an AUC of 0.817, outperforming Quadruple-D (AUC: 0.722) and Triple-D (AUC: 0.639). MAP score was the most powerful and accurate independent predictor of SF status after ESWL, offering superior clinical utility compared to Triple-D and Quadruple-D scores in pre-treatment evaluation.

Quadruple-D score in the success rate of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of renal stones in pediatric population

OBJECTIVES

Evaluation of the validity of the Quadruple-D score in the prediction of success in pediatric stone disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Of the 292 children treated with SWL between 2007 and 2023, a total of 158 children who had adequate follow-up data and evaluated with non-contrast computed tomography before SWL, were included in the study. Parameters were calculated for each of the stone volume (SV), skin-to-stone distance (SSD), stone density (SD) and stone location (SL) variables. Receiver operator characteristic analysis was used to set cut-off values. Quadruple-D scores were calculated, and success rates were determined for each score. Stone-free status was determined as complete clearance after three months of final SWL.

RESULTS

The median age of the study group was 8 (range 1 to 16). One hundred and one of the 158 (64%) children had stone-free status. Mean SV, SSD and SD values were significantly higher in SWL failed group than stone-free group after detecting cutoff values of 150 mm3, 6.7 cm, and 540 HU, respectively. Stone-free rates were detected as 19.6%, 24.7%, 37.2%, 76.2%, and 90.2% with the Quadruple-D scores of 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 points.

CONCLUSIONS

Quadruple-D scoring system can further improve Triple-D scoring system by adding stone position parameter to clarify SFR with a simple and easy calculation. We believe that the Quadruple-D score will have better clinical significance than the Triple-D scoring system in predicting the success of SWL in children.

Role of Noncontrast Computed Tomography Parameters in Predicting the Outcome of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Upper Urinary Stones Cases: A Meta-analysis

RATIONALE

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is widely considered the primary approach for managing urinary tract stones. This study aimed to assess the predictive factors associated with non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT)-based parameters of upper urinary stones in relation to the outcomes of ESWL.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library to identify all relevant studies published up to June 3, 2023. Several NCCT-based parameters to predict ESWL outcomes, comprised of mean stone density (MSD), skin-to-stone distance (SSD), and stone size, were extracted and analyzed using Review Manager software.

RESULTS

Out of 979 publications screened, a total of 39 publications, involving 7869 patients, were enrolled in the analysis. The pooled estimate demonstrated significant differences between MSD, and stone size between successful and failure of stone fragmentation groups, in which lower values of these parameters are associated with successful ESWL outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The results from the current study suggested that lower NCCT parameters, notably MSD, SSD, and stone size, are significantly associated with successful ESWL outcome. However, additional large-scale prospective studies are required to utilize these parameters effectively, and the optimal cutoff value should be determined.

Stone decision engine accurately predicts stone removal and treatment complications for shock wave lithotripsy and laser ureterorenoscopy patients

Kidney stones form when mineral salts crystallize in the urinary tract. While most stones exit the body in the urine stream, some can block the ureteropelvic junction or ureters, leading to severe lower back pain, blood in the urine, vomiting, and painful urination. Imaging technologies, such as X-rays or ureterorenoscopy (URS), are typically used to detect kidney stones. Subsequently, these stones are fragmented into smaller pieces using shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) or laser URS. Both treatments yield subtly different patient outcomes. To predict successful stone removal and complication outcomes, Artificial Neural Network models were trained on 15,126 SWL and 2,116 URS patient records. These records include patient metrics like Body Mass Index and age, as well as treatment outcomes obtained using various medical instruments and healthcare professionals. Due to the low number of outcome failures in the data (e.g., treatment complications), Nearest Neighbor and Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) models were implemented to improve prediction accuracies. To reduce noise in the predictions, ensemble modeling was employed. The average prediction accuracies based on Confusion Matrices for SWL stone removal and treatment complications were 84.8% and 95.0%, respectively, while those for URS were 89.0% and 92.2%, respectively. The average prediction accuracies for SWL based on Area-Under-the-Curve were 74.7% and 62.9%, respectively, while those for URS were 77.2% and 78.9%, respectively. Taken together, the approach yielded moderate to high accurate predictions, regardless of treatment or outcome. These models were incorporated into a Stone Decision Engine web application (http://peteranoble.com/webapps.html) that suggests the best interventions to healthcare providers based on individual patient metrics.

Variation coefficient of stone density and renal cortical thickness: the parameters evaluating non-contrast computed tomography imaging for predict extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy success

The stone density (SD) is not the same in all parts of the stone due to the heterogeneous nature of the stone and the shock wave (SW) passes through tissues of many different densities until it reaches the stone. These factors affect the success of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL). We aimed to evaluate the effect of the Variation Coefficient of Stone Density (VCSD) and Renal Cortical Tickness (RCT) on the success of ESWL. Between 2020 and 2023, 510 patients who underwent ESWL were divided into 2 groups treatment success (n:304) and treatment failure (n:206). Non-Contrast Computed Tomography (NCCT) imaging values of hydronephrosis degree of the kidney, stone location, stone volume (SV), stone-skin distance (SSD), SD, Standard deviation of Stone Density (SDSD), VCSD, RCT, Soft-Tissue Thickness (STT), Muscle Thickness (MT) were analyzed. VCSD value was obtained by dividing SDSD by SD. Along the SW, tissues were divided into three components: kidney (renal cortex), muscle and other soft tissues. RCT, MT and SSD were measured at three different angles (0°, 45°, and 90°) and these 3 lengths were averaged. In univariate analysis, Body Mass Index (BMI), SV, SD, VCSD, SSD, RCT and STT were demonstrated to affect ESWL success. In multivariate analysis, low BMI, SV, SD, RCT and large VCSD were significant independent predictors of ESWL success. Among these parameters, VCSD had the highest prediction accuracy, followed by SD, SV, RCT and BMI, respectively. This study demonstrated that VCSD value and RCT are predictive parameters in determining the treatment of patients with urinary calculi and selecting suitable ESWL candidates.

A Prospective Study on the Impact of Clinical Factors and Adjusted Triple D System for Success Rate of ESWL

Objective: Our study aimed to evaluate the success rate of ESWL and identify relevant treatment-specific factors affecting treatment outcomes, as well as to assess the accuracy of the updated Triple D scoring system and compare it with older systems. Material and Methods: A prospective study of 71 patients who received ESWL treatment for renal stones that were 5-15 mm in size was completed. The patient having no residual stones or residual stones lesser than 4 mm after ESWL was identified as a treatment success. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression and ROC curves were used to identify important factors for treatment outcomes. Results: Successful treatment was achieved for 66.2% of patients. The stone volume (SV), mean stone density (MD), and delivered power to the stone volume unit ratio (SMLI/SV) were defined as the most critical factors influencing ESWL success. An updated Triple D score system with a, SMLI/SV ratio could be an alternative to older systems and reach an even higher accuracy. A limitation of this study is the limited sample size due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusions: Our results show that the three factors that most influence the success of ESWL are the stone size, mean stone density, and SMLI/SV ratio. Based on this, we present a simple updated triple D score system to predict ESWL success, which could be implemented in future clinical practice.

Role of Hounsfield Unit in Predicting Outcomes of Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Renal Calculi: Outcomes of a Systematic Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy success rates depend on several stone and patient-related factors, one of which is stone density which is calculated on computed tomography scan in Hounsfield Units. Studies have shown inverse correlation between SWL success and HU; however, there remains considerable variation between studies. We performed a systematic review regarding the use of HU in SWL for renal calculi to consolidate the current evidence and address current knowledge gaps.

RECENT FINDINGS

Database including MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus were searched from inception through August 2022. Studies in English language analysing stone density/attenuation in adult patients undergoing SWL for renal calculi were included for assessment of Shockwave lithotripsy outcomes, use of stone attenuation to predict success, use of mean and peak stone density and Hounsfield unit density, determination of optimum cut-off values, nomograms/scoring systems, and assessment of stone heterogeneity. 28 studies with a total of 4,206 patients were included in this systematic review with sample size ranging from 30 to 385 patients. Male to female ratio was 1.8, with an average age of 46.3 years. Mean overall ESWL success was 66.5%. Stone size ranged from 4 to 30 mm in diameter. Mean stone density was used by two-third of the studies to predict the appropriate cut-off for SWL success, ranging from 750 to 1000 HU. Additional factors such as peak HU and stone heterogeneity index were also evaluated with variable results. Stone heterogeneity index was considered a better indicator for success in larger stones (cut-off value of 213) and predicting SWL stone clearance in one session. Prediction scores had been attempted, with researchers looking into combining stone density with other factors such as skin to stone distance, stone volume, and differing heterogeneity indices with variable results. Numerous studies demonstrate a link between shockwave lithotripsy outcomes and stone density. Hounsfield unit < 750 has been found to be associated with shockwave lithotripsy success, with likelihood of failure strongly associated with values over 1000. Prospective standardisation of Hounsfield unit measurement and predictive algorithm for shockwave lithotripsy outcome should be considered to strengthen future evidence and help clinicians in the decision making.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database: CRD42020224647.

Predictors of stone-free rate after a single-session extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for a single kidney stone measuring 10 to 20 mm: A private center experience

BACKGROUND

Despite the continuous update of guidelines for the management of kidney stones, the ability to predict a successful response to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) remains a topic of research. This is due to the need to refine the decision making in the context of technological advancements and current pandemics. This study aimed to determine the predictors of stone-free rate (SFR) after single-session SWL in adult patients with a single kidney stone 10 to 20 mm in diameter.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of the records of patients with a single kidney stone 10 to 20 mm in diameter was performed at a private SWL center from December 2019 to February 2021. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for stone- and patient-related factors, using the Student t and Mann-Whitney U tests for the quantitative variables and the Fisher exact and Pearson correlation tests for the qualitative variables.

RESULTS

A total of 138 patients were eligible for this study, including 92 men and 46 women. The mean age was 38.6 ± 12.4 years, and the mean body mass index (BMI) was 25.9 ± 3.4 kg/m2. Four weeks after SWL, 120 patients (87%) were free of stones, and 18 (13%) needed further treatment. Univariate analyses showed that SFR was negatively correlated with increased BMI (p = 0.0001), maximum stone length (p = 0.0001), transverse diameter of the stone (p = 0.0001), number of shocks per session (p = 0.052), and Hounsfield unit (HU) (p = 0.0001). Multivariate analysis revealed that HU (p = 0.009), maximum stone length (p = 0.01), BMI (p = 0.000), and presence of double-J stent (p = 0.034) were independent risk factors for failure of single-session SWL in the treatment of kidney stones 10 to 20 mm in diameter. The estimated average cost per case was USD 450.5.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased HU, maximum stone length, BMI, and presence of double-J stents were independent risk factors for low SFR after single-session SWL for a kidney stone 10 to 20 mm in diameter. The cost of SWL remains an advantage in the private sector.

Is Triple D Score Effective to Predict the Stone-Free Rate After Shockwave Lithotripsy in Pediatric Population?

Introduction: Triple D score was developed using skin-to-stone distance (SSD), stone density (SD), and stone volume (SV) for prediction of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) outcomes in adults. SWL is the first-line treatment method for kidney stones <2 cm in children, however, it was not validated in the pediatric population. This article aims to validate Triple D score in pediatric patients. Materials and Methods: Of the 269 children treated with SWL between 2007 and 2021, a total of 147 children who had adequate follow-up data and evaluated with noncontrast CT before SWL were included in the study. Parameters were calculated for each of the SV, SSD, and SD variables. Receiver operator characteristic analysis was used to set cutoff values. Triple D scores were calculated, and success rates were determined for each score. Stone-free status was determined as complete clearance after 3 months of final SWL. Results: The median age of the study group was 7 years (range 1-16). Ninety-three of the 147 (63%) children had stone-free status. Mean SV, SSD, and SD values were significantly higher in the SWL-failed group than in the stone-free group after detecting cutoff values of 155 mm³, 6.5 cm, and 550 HU, respectively. Stone-free rates were detected as 23.8%, 35.1%, 74.0%, and 92.0% with the Triple D scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3 points. Conclusions: Our study confirms that Triple D scores support the SWL outcomes in the pediatric population. We believe that our research on Triple D score validation in children is of great clinical importance although various factors may affect to predict the success of SWL. IRB Approval: 2021/514/194/14.

A prospective observational study on the predictability of Triple-D score versus Quadruple-D score in the success rate of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of renal stones 1–2 cm in diameter

Introduction:

The aim of the study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy of Triple-D scoring system versus Quadruple-D scoring system for assessing stone-free rate (SFR) in individuals with renal stones measuring 1–2 cm in diameter after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL).

Materials and Methods:

The study was conducted on 120 patients who presented to a tertiary care center in eastern India. Systemic random sampling technique was applied with a sampling interval of 2. Triple-D scoring system comprising of three computed tomography based metrics – stone dimension (volume), stone density (Hounsfield unit), and skin-to-stone distance (SSD) was done before ESWL. Stone location was included as an additional parameter to formulate Quadruple-D scoring system where an extra score was given for stones in the non-lower polar region. Stone-free status was assessed by plain abdominal radiography 3 weeks after ESWL.

Results:

In the study population, stone dimension, stone density, and stone location were positive predictors of SFR after ESWL whereas age, sex, and body mass index of the patients, laterality of the stone and SSD were not. The area under the curve of Triple-D and Quadruple-D scoring systems were 0.598 and 0.674.

Conclusion:

Triple-D scoring system has been successfully validated as the SFR showed a parallel increase with every positive component. The Quadruple-D scoring system with a simple addition of stone location can further facilitate the validation of Triple-D scoring by increasing SFR, keeping the calculation simple and easy to use. These findings support the incorporation of Quadruple-D scoring system over Triple-D scoring system.

Is Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy the Modality of Choice Versus Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy for a 20 to 30 mm Single Renal Pelvic Stone with ≤1000 Hounsfield Unit in Adults? A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study

Objectives: To compare the efficacy, complications, and costs of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) in the treatment of a 20 to 30 mm single renal pelvic stone with a density ≤1000 HU. Patients and Methods: Eighty patients were prospectively randomized to receive either PNL or SWL during May 2017 to April 2019. The relevant demographic and clinical characteristics were compared. Results: The mean age in the PNL and SWL groups was 43.25 ± 15.16 and 44.18 ± 12.08 years, respectively. The mean stone sizes were 25.2 ± 3.9 and 24.6 ± 2.3 mm, respectively. The stone-free rate (SFR) was significantly different after the primary procedures (92.5% vs 37.5%, respectively; p < 0.04), but it was comparable after 3 months (97.5% vs 90%, respectively; p = 0.723), with a higher rate of auxiliary procedures after SWL (p = 0.017). On multivariate analysis, stone density was the only significant variable for the SFR in the SWL group (p = 0.004). Complications occurred in 27.5% and 22.5% of cases, respectively (p = 0.796). The mean costs of SWL (650.23 ± 424.74 United States Dollars [US$]) were significantly lower than those of PNL (1137.65 ± 224.43 US$; p < 0.0001). Conclusions: The SFRs for PNL and SWL were not significantly different after 3 months in the treatment of a 20 to 30 mm single renal pelvic stone with ≤1000 HU, although PNL provided a significantly higher rate after its primary procedure. SWL was significantly less costly, but it mandated a significantly higher number of auxiliary procedures than PNL.

Is physical therapy effective following extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy and retrograde intrarenal surgery: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Background

Physical therapy, including percussion, inversion, vibration and combinations, was clinically performed to improve the stone free rate (SFR) following lithotripsy procedures. However, physical therapy is not widely accepted in clinical practice owing to lack of high level evidence support and a standard protocol. The present meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of physical therapy in improving SFR following extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS).

Methods

Systematic review of literature from PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane library and Embase was performed in March 2019. The efficacy and safety of physical therapy after ESWL and RIRS were assessed by meta-analysis of SFR and complication rate.

Results

A total of 8 prospective studies with 1065 patients were enrolled. When compared to non-intervention, physical therapy provided a higher SFR (OR:3.38, 95% CI: 2.45–4.66, p < 0.0001) at all time points (week 1, week 2 and month 1), while there was no significant difference in complications such as hematuria, lumbago, dizziness and urinary tract infection (OR: 0.84; 95%CI: 0.62–1.13; p = 0.237). In subgroup analysis of different stone locations, lower calyx stone (OR: 3.51; 95%CI: 2.21–5.55; p < 0.0001), upper ureter and renal pelvic stones (OR:2.79; 95%CI:1.62–4.81; p = 0.0002) had a higher SFR after physical therapy, while there was no significant improvement in SFR in upper and middle calyx stones. In subgroup analysis of different techniques, EPVL (external physical vibration lithecbole, OR:3.47; 95%CI:2.24–5.37; p < 0.0001) and PDI (percussion, diuresis and inversion, OR:3.24; 95%CI:2.01–5.21; p < 0.0001) were both effective in improving SFR when compared to non-intervention.

Conclusions

Physical therapy is effective in improving the SFR after ESWL and RIRS, especially for lower calyx stones, upper ureter and renal pelvic stones, while without significant side effects. External physical vibration lithecbole (EPVL) might provide a relative uniformed and repeatable protocol for clinical practice of physical therapy.

Trial registration

PROSPERO 2019 CRD42019130228.