1
|
Durant AM, Moore J, Voleti S, Wu S, Mi L, Narang G, Cheney S, Humphreys M. Salvage versus primary holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: trends, outcomes and safety analysis. World J Urol 2022; 40:2305-2312. [PMID: 35867143 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-04098-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To study the safety, efficacy and trends in index procedures leading to salvage holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (S-HoLEP). METHODS This was a single-institution retrospective review of HoLEPs performed between 2006 and 2020. Patients who underwent S-HoLEP were compared to those undergoing primary holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (P-HoLEP). The endpoint of primary interest were functional outcomes. Changes in index procedures over the study period were analyzed. RESULTS A total of 633 HoLEPs were performed during the study, with 217 being S-HoLEP. The S-HoLEP cohort was older than P-HoLEP cohort, 71.2 years vs 68.8 years (p = 0.03). All other factors were well matched. The most common index procedures prior to S-HoLEP included transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) (87, 40.1%), transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) (44, 20.3%), photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) (24, 11.1%) and prostatic urethral lift (PUL) (24, 11.1%). Preoperative prostate volume, IPSS and Qmax were similar between groups. Intra-operatively, S-HoLEP had longer procedure and morcellation times (p = 0.01 and 0.007). Postoperatively, the S-HoLEP cohort had longer catheter duration and hospitalization (both p < 0.001). Postoperative Qmax, IPSS and 90-day complication rates were similar. On temporal analysis, minimally invasive surgical therapies (MIST) have become more prevalent as index procedures. CONCLUSION S-HoLEP is safe and efficacious for patients requiring additional BPH surgical intervention. S-HoLEP patients had longer operative times and hospital stays but equivalent postoperative functional outcomes compared to P-HoLEP. As MIST mature and gain traction, it is expected that rates of S-HoLEP will continue to rise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adri M Durant
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA.
| | | | - Sandeep Voleti
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Sarah Wu
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Lanyu Mi
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Gopal Narang
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Scott Cheney
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Mitchell Humphreys
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Franco JVA, Jung JH, Imamura M, Borofsky M, Omar MI, Escobar Liquitay CM, Young S, Golzarian J, Veroniki AA, Garegnani L, Dahm P. Minimally invasive treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a Cochrane network meta-analysis. BJU Int 2021; 130:142-156. [PMID: 34820997 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2021] [Revised: 11/12/2021] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the comparative effectiveness and ranking of minimally invasive treatments (MITs) for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). MATERIALS AND METHODS We searched multiple databases up to 24 February 2021. We included randomized controlled trials assessing the following treatments: convective radiofrequency water vapour thermal therapy (WVTT; or Rezūm); prostatic arterial embolization (PAE); prostatic urethral lift (PUL; or Urolift); temporary implantable nitinol device (TIND); and transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) compared to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) or sham surgery. We performed a frequentist network meta-analysis. RESULTS We included 27 trials involving 3017 men. The overall certainty of the evidence of most outcomes according to GRADE was low to very low. Compared to TURP, we found that PUL and PAE may result in little to no difference in urological symptoms, while WVTT, TUMT and TIND may result in worse urological symptoms. MITs may result in little to no difference in quality of life, compared to TURP. MITs may result in a large reduction in major adverse events compared to TURP. We were uncertain about the effects of PAE and PUL on retreatment compared to TURP, however, TUMT may result in higher retreatment rates. We were very uncertain of the effects of MITs on erectile function and ejaculatory function. Among MITs, PUL and PAE had the highest likelihood of being the most efficacious for urinary symptoms and quality of life, TUMT for major adverse events, WVTT and TIND for erectile function and PUL for ejaculatory function. Excluding WVTT and TIND, for which there were only studies with short-term (3-month) follow-up, PUL had the highest likelihood of being the most efficacious for retreatment. CONCLUSIONS Minimally invasive treatments may result in similar or worse effects concerning urinary symptoms and quality of life compared to TURP at short-term follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Victor Ariel Franco
- Associate Cochrane Centre, Instituto Universitario Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Jae Hung Jung
- Department of Urology, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, South Korea.,Center of Evidence-Based Medicine, Institute of Convergence Science, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Mari Imamura
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Michael Borofsky
- Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Muhammad Imran Omar
- Guidelines Office, European Association of Urology, Arnhem, The Netherlands.,Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | | | - Shamar Young
- Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology & Vascular Imaging, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Jafar Golzarian
- Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology & Vascular Imaging, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Areti Angeliki Veroniki
- Department of Primary Education, School of Education, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Luis Garegnani
- Associate Cochrane Centre, Instituto Universitario Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Philipp Dahm
- Urology Section, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Muller BG, Martens FMJ, Heesakkers JPFA, d'Ancona F. Urodynamic effects of prostatic urethral lift procedure for male voiding LUTS. J Endourol 2021; 35:1813-1817. [PMID: 34314260 DOI: 10.1089/end.2021.0050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS Primary objective is to investigate whether prostatic urethral lift (PUL) results in an improvement of urodynamic parameters that define bladder outlet obstruction (urethral resistance algorithm [URA], Schäfer grade, PdetQmax, PdetOpen). METHODS 20 patients (main inclusion criteria: ≥ 50 years of age, BPO, IPSS ≥ 13, prostate volume ≤ 60 mL, no middle prostate lobe) were enrolled in the study and a PUL was performed. Patients underwent urodynamic investigation and filled out the IPSS and QoL before and after PUL. A paired T test was used to analyze the results. RESULTS The mean age was 68 years (range 55-79), mean prostate volume (TRUS) was 45 mL (range 20-59) and mean PSA was 2.0 ug/L (0.2-4.4). IPSS of the 16 patients reduced significantly (from 22.20 to 14.47, p=0.000). Qmax during pressure flow study improved significantly (from 4.5 ml/s to 7.2 ml/s, p=0.001), no significant difference was found in Qmax during free uroflowmetry. There was no significant difference found in post voiding residual. URA decreased significantly post treatment (from 52 cmH2O to 37 cmH2O, p=0.000). The Schäfer obstruction plot decreased significantly (from 3.5 to 2.6, p= 0.022). Seven patients underwent Greenlight Laser Vaporization of the prostate after the PUL due to unsatisfactory results. CONCLUSIONS PUL has desobstructive effects, but they seem clinically modest. The procedure improves urodynamic parameters as well as QoL in males with LUTS based on BPO. However, the mechanism how PUL leads to a remarkable symptom relieve remains unclear and cannot be explained by the desobstructive mechanisms we observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Frank d'Ancona
- Radboudumc, 6034, Urology, Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Antoine SG, Carmichael H, Lloyd GL. The Impact of Race, Ethnicity and Insurance Status on Surgery Rates for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Urology 2021; 163:44-49. [PMID: 34303762 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.05.092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2020] [Revised: 04/11/2021] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine whether patient race/ethnicity are associated with differences in likelihood of undergoing surgical treatment for LUTS/BPH. METHODS Queried hospital network database between 1/2011 and 10/2018. Men over age 40 on medical therapy for LUTS (selective alpha blockade and/or 5-alpha-reductase inhibitor), with 2+ provider visits, and without bladder/prostate malignancy were included. Ethnicity/race determined by self-identification. Insurance status classified as public (Medicare/Medicaid/Tricare), private, self-pay, or other. Multivariable backwards step-wise logistic regression was performed to compare odds of undergoing a surgical procedure by race/ethnicity, controlling for patient age, insurance status, comorbidities, and type of medical therapy. RESULTS 30,466 patients included, with White (n=24,443, 80.2%), Hispanic (n=2,715, 8.9%), Black (n=1,245, 4.1%), and other race/ethnicity (2,073, 6.8%) identified within the study population. After adjusting for age, insurance status, major comorbidities, and type of medical therapy, Black patients were less likely to undergo surgery than White patients (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.37 - 0.88, P = .011), as were patients of other race/ethnicity (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.49 - 0.92, P = .013). CONCLUSIONS Adjusting for age, insurance status, major comorbidities and type of LUTS medication, men categorized as Black were significantly less likely to undergo surgical treatment for LUTS/BPH than White patients. It is unknown whether this difference results from differences in counseling, access, or other bias in therapy. Efforts to understand and respond to this disparity are necessary. Limitations include lack of IPSS data, additional comorbidity data, limited geographic area, and retrospective nature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel G Antoine
- Division of Urology, University of Colorado Department of Surgery, Aurora, CO
| | | | - Granville L Lloyd
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Rocky Mountain Regional Veterans Hospital, University of Colorado Anschutz School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Franco JV, Jung JH, Imamura M, Borofsky M, Omar MI, Escobar Liquitay CM, Young S, Golzarian J, Veroniki AA, Garegnani L, Dahm P. Minimally invasive treatments for lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 7:CD013656. [PMID: 34693990 PMCID: PMC8543673 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013656.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A variety of minimally invasive treatments are available as an alternative to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for management of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). However, it is unclear which treatments provide better results. OBJECTIVES Our primary objective was to assess the comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive treatments for lower urinary tract symptoms in men with BPH through a network meta-analysis. Our secondary objective was to obtain an estimate of relative ranking of these minimally invasive treatments, according to their effects. SEARCH METHODS We performed a comprehensive search of multiple databases (CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and LILACS), trials registries, other sources of grey literature, and conference proceedings, up to 24 February 2021. We had no restrictions on language of publication or publication status. SELECTION CRITERIA We included parallel-group randomized controlled trials assessing the effects of the following minimally invasive treatments, compared to TURP or sham treatment, on men with moderate to severe LUTS due to BPH: convective radiofrequency water vapor therapy (CRFWVT); prostatic arterial embolization (PAE); prostatic urethral lift (PUL); temporary implantable nitinol device (TIND); and transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. We performed statistical analyses using a random-effects model for pair-wise comparisons and a frequentist network meta-analysis for combined estimates. We interpreted them according to Cochrane methods. We planned subgroup analyses by age, prostate volume, and severity of baseline symptoms. We used risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to express dichotomous data and mean differences (MDs) with 95% CIs to express continuous data. We used the GRADE approach to rate the certainty of evidence. MAIN RESULTS We included 27 trials involving 3017 men, mostly over age 50, with severe LUTS due to BPH. The overall certainty of evidence was low to very low due to concerns regarding bias, imprecision, inconsistency (heterogeneity), and incoherence. Based on the network meta-analysis, results for our main outcomes were as follows. Urologic symptoms (19 studies, 1847 participants): PUL and PAE may result in little to no difference in urologic symptoms scores (MD of International Prostate Symptoms Score [IPSS]) compared to TURP (3 to 12 months; MD range 0 to 35; higher scores indicate worse symptoms; PUL: 1.47, 95% CI -4.00 to 6.93; PAE: 1.55, 95% CI -1.23 to 4.33; low-certainty evidence). CRFWVT, TUMT, and TIND may result in worse urologic symptoms scores compared to TURP at short-term follow-up, but the CIs include little to no difference (CRFWVT: 3.6, 95% CI -4.25 to 11.46; TUMT: 3.98, 95% CI 0.85 to 7.10; TIND: 7.5, 95% CI -0.68 to 15.69; low-certainty evidence). Quality of life (QoL) (13 studies, 1459 participants): All interventions may result in little to no difference in the QoL scores, compared to TURP (3 to 12 months; MD of IPSS-QoL score; MD range 0 to 6; higher scores indicate worse symptoms; PUL: 0.06, 95% CI -1.17 to 1.30; PAE: 0.09, 95% CI -0.57 to 0.75; CRFWVT: 0.37, 95% CI -1.45 to 2.20; TUMT: 0.65, 95% CI -0.48 to 1.78; TIND: 0.87, 95% CI -1.04 to 2.79; low-certainty evidence). Major adverse events (15 studies, 1573 participants): TUMT probably results in a large reduction of major adverse events compared to TURP (RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.43; moderate-certainty evidence). PUL, CRFWVT, TIND and PAE may also result in a large reduction in major adverse events, but CIs include substantial benefits and harms at three months to 36 months; PUL: RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.04 to 2.22; CRFWVT: RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.01 to 18.62; TIND: RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.01 to 24.46; PAE: RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.25 to 1.68; low-certainty evidence). Retreatment (10 studies, 799 participants): We are uncertain about the effects of PAE and PUL on retreatment compared to TURP (12 to 60 months; PUL: RR 2.39, 95% CI 0.51 to 11.1; PAE: RR 4.39, 95% CI 1.25 to 15.44; very low-certainty evidence). TUMT may result in higher retreatment rates (RR 9.71, 95% CI 2.35 to 40.13; low-certainty evidence). Erectile function (six studies, 640 participants): We are very uncertain of the effects of minimally invasive treatments on erectile function (MD of International Index of Erectile Function [IIEF-5]; range 5 to 25; higher scores indicates better function; CRFWVT: 6.49, 95% CI -8.13 to 21.12; TIND: 5.19, 95% CI -9.36 to 19.74; PUL: 3.00, 95% CI -5.45 to 11.44; PAE: -0.03, 95% CI -6.38, 6.32; very low-certainty evidence). Ejaculatory dysfunction (eight studies, 461 participants): We are uncertain of the effects of PUL, PAE and TUMT on ejaculatory dysfunction compared to TURP (3 to 12 months; PUL: RR 0.05, 95 % CI 0.00 to 1.06; PAE: RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.92; TUMT: RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.68; low-certainty evidence). TURP is the reference treatment with the highest likelihood of being the most efficacious for urinary symptoms, QoL and retreatment, but the least favorable in terms of major adverse events, erectile function and ejaculatory function. Among minimally invasive procedures, PUL and PAE have the highest likelihood of being the most efficacious for urinary symptoms and QoL, TUMT for major adverse events, PUL for retreatment, CRFWVT and TIND for erectile function and PUL for ejaculatory function. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Minimally invasive treatments may result in similar or worse effects concerning urinary symptoms and QoL compared to TURP at short-term follow-up. They may result in fewer major adverse events, especially in the case of PUL and PAE; resulting in better rankings for symptoms scores. PUL may result in fewer retreatments compared to other interventions, especially TUMT, which had the highest retreatment rates at long-term follow-up. We are very uncertain about the effects of these interventions on erectile function. There was limited long-term data, especially for CRFWVT and TIND. Future high-quality studies with more extended follow-up, comparing different, active treatment modalities, and adequately reporting critical outcomes relevant to patients, including those related to sexual function, could provide more information on the relative effectiveness of these interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Va Franco
- Associate Cochrane Centre, Instituto Universitario Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Jae Hung Jung
- Department of Urology, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea, South
- Center of Evidence-Based Medicine, Institute of Convergence Science, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea, South
| | - Mari Imamura
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Michael Borofsky
- Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Muhammad Imran Omar
- Guidelines Office, European Association of Urology, Arnhem, Netherlands
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | | | - Shamar Young
- Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology & Vascular Imaging, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Jafar Golzarian
- Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology & Vascular Imaging, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Areti Angeliki Veroniki
- Department of Primary Education, School of Education, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Luis Garegnani
- Associate Cochrane Centre, Instituto Universitario Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Philipp Dahm
- Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
- Urology Section, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Loloi J, Feiertag N, Gautam K, Maria P. An Update on the Outcomes of Patients Treated with Urolift for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Res Rep Urol 2021; 13:347-355. [PMID: 34150678 PMCID: PMC8205643 DOI: 10.2147/rru.s273692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a ubiquitous urologic disease affecting aging men. Patients often experience bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) that warrant urologic evaluation and management. Routinely, patients are initially treated with medical therapies with the goal of both relaxing the bladder neck and shrinking the prostate in order to relieve obstruction secondary to prostatic enlargement. Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) serves as a first-line surgical intervention in those who fail medical therapy. Recently, novel minimally invasive surgical techniques for BPH management have emerged. Of these, prostatic urethral lift (PUL or Urolift) has gained attention given its presumed effectiveness and minimal risk of sexual side effects when compared to the standard TURP. The purpose of this review is to describe past and current trends in the implementation of PUL for BPH and to highlight important outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin Loloi
- Department of Urology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Pedro Maria
- Department of Urology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Malde S, Lam W, Adwin Z, Hashim H. Pharmacological and interventional treatment of benign prostatic obstruction: An evidence‐based comparative review. BJUI COMPASS 2021; 2:238-259. [PMID: 35475299 PMCID: PMC8988658 DOI: 10.1002/bco2.74] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2020] [Revised: 01/18/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The recommended treatment for bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) after the failure of behavioral therapy and fluid modification includes pharmacological, minimally invasive interventional, and surgical approaches. Each option has different risk and benefit profiles, and the urologist must be aware of the unique characteristics of each option in order to be able to accurately counsel the patients based on their individual values and preferences. We provide a comparative review of the commonest pharmacological and most widely performed interventional/surgical treatments for BPO, discussing the evidence for the treatment characteristics that are most useful for the practicing urologist. Methods A search of the PubMed database was performed for articles reporting on the following treatments for LUTS due to BPO: α‐blockers, 5α‐reductase inhibitors, phosphpdiesterase‐5 inhibitors, prostatic urethral lift (Urolift), convective radiofrequency water vapor thermal therapy (Rezum), Temporary implantable Nitinol Device (iTIND), prostate artery embolization (PAE), transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP), Aquablation, and anatomical endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (AEEP). We performed a narrative review focussing on the following outcomes: efficacy, safety, durability, duration of catheterization, length of stay, re‐treatment rate, efficacy in special situations (enlarged median lobe, prostate size, urinary retention, and anticoagulant use), and sexual adverse events. Results AEEP offers the greatest long‐term improvement in maximum flow rate, IPSS, and prostate volume reduction, with lowest re‐treatment rate, followed by PVP, TURP, and Aquablation. Urolift, Rezum, and PAE have similar efficacy for prostate volume up to 80cc, and all are more effective than the pharmacological treatment. Urolift offers the lowest rate of sexual dysfunction, followed by Rezum, and both can be performed as a day case under local anesthesia. Conclusion Several treatment options exist to treat voiding LUTS due to BPO. Newer minimally invasive treatments reduce the hospital stay and postoperative complications, whereas AEEP provides the greatest long‐term symptom improvement at the expense of higher morbidity and sexual dysfunction. Men should be counseled regarding all suitable treatment options as some may favor reduced efficacy in association with reduced side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sachin Malde
- Department of Urology Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust London UK
| | - Wayne Lam
- Division of Urology Department of Surgery LKS Faculty of Medicine Queen Mary Hospital The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong Hong Kong SAR
| | - Zainal Adwin
- Department of Surgery Faculty of Medicine Universiti Teknologi MARA Selangor Malaysia
| | - Hashim Hashim
- Bristol Urological Institute Southmead Hospital North Bristol NHS Trust Bristol UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tanneru K, Jazayeri SB, Alam MU, Kumar J, Bazargani S, Kuntz G, Palayapalayam Ganapathi H, Bandyk M, Marino R, Koochekpour S, Gautam S, Balaji KC, Costa J. An Indirect Comparison of Newer Minimally Invasive Treatments for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Network Meta-Analysis Model. J Endourol 2021; 35:409-416. [PMID: 32962442 DOI: 10.1089/end.2020.0739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: This study was designed to provide an indirect comparison of the urinary and sexual domain outcomes and complications after newer minimally invasive surgical therapy (MIST) of Aquablation, Rezum, and UroLift for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) for transurethral resection of prostate (TURP). Methods: We searched Embase, Medline, and Cochrane in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement, in December 2019. Only randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that reported outcomes after treatment of BPH for prostate less than 80 g with Aquablation, Rezum, or UroLift were included in the analysis. Results: A total of four RCTs reporting the outcomes after treatment with newer MIST for BPH were identified. Patients undergoing the resective procedures, that is, TURP and Aquablation, had greater improvement in urinary domain outcomes: International Prostate Symptom Score, quality of life, peak flow rate, and postvoiding residual compared to patients undergoing nonresective procedures: UroLift and Rezum. Patients in UroLift group maintained a higher sexual function domain score compared to TURP, but not Aquablation. Our multiple comparison analysis did not reveal a significant difference in urinary and sexual domain scores between patients undergoing UroLift and Rezum at 24 months of follow-up. Conclusions: Aquablation and TURP necessitate general or regional anesthesia and both produced significantly better urinary domain scores compared to Rezum and UroLift. On the other hand, UroLift demonstrated better sexual function domain scores compared to TURP, but not Aquablation. There was no significant difference in urinary domain scores between UroLift and Rezum at 24 months of follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karthik Tanneru
- Department of Urology, University of Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | | | - Muhammad Umar Alam
- Department of Urology, University of Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Jatinder Kumar
- Department of Urology, University of Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Soroush Bazargani
- Department of Urology, University of Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Gretchen Kuntz
- Borland Library, University of Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | | | - Mark Bandyk
- Department of Urology, University of Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Robert Marino
- Department of Urology, University of Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | | | - Shiva Gautam
- Department of Urology, University of Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - K C Balaji
- Department of Urology, University of Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Joseph Costa
- Department of Urology, University of Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Jing J, Wu Y, Du M, Zhang N, Wang M, Xu B, Chen M. Urethral Lift as a Safe and Effective Procedure for Prostatic Hyplasia Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Surg 2021; 7:598728. [PMID: 33425981 PMCID: PMC7793831 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2020.598728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2020] [Accepted: 10/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Prostatic urethral lift (PUL) is a relatively new minimally invasive treatment procedure for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). In order to analyze the sustainability of this new protocol, a systematic review and meta-analysis is performed based on the published articles. Methods: We performed a critical review according to the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA) and MOOSE guidelines. A total of 818 published articles matched our search terms, and 11 studies met the inclusion criteria. Data of each follow-up time point (1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months) were analyzed in terms of baseline characteristics and functional and sexual health outcomes. The merged means of each time point were calculated using R package meta and shown in the tendency plot. Results: A total of 1,443 patients who underwent PUL are available for the research. At 24 months, the changes of the three indicators are statistically significant (IPSS 9.40 points, p < 0.001; Qmax 3.39 ml/s, p < 0.001; QoL 1.99 points, p < 0.001) but were not as effective as TURP (from literature). The trend plot shows that, as time goes on, the effect of PUL tends to increase first and then weaken. Three items fitted a meaningful curve: IPSS (slope = −1.378 t = −12.395, p < 0.001), Qmax (slope = −1.382 t = −6.429, p < 0.001), and QoL (slope = −0.218, t = −10.058, p < 0.001). Fitted curves of SHIM and PVR are not statistically significant. The regression reveals that IPSS, Qmax, and QoL could be predicted after accepting PUL. Conclusion: PUL appears to be a safe and effective procedure in selected patients with BPH and can improve the symptoms of urinary tract obstruction. However, it is not as effective as TURP and shows no influence to the objective indicators like PVR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jibo Jing
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Zhongda Hospital of Southeast University, Nanjing, China.,Surgical Research Center, Institute of Urology, Medical School of Southeast University, Nanjing, China.,Lishui People's Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Yuqing Wu
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Zhongda Hospital of Southeast University, Nanjing, China.,Surgical Research Center, Institute of Urology, Medical School of Southeast University, Nanjing, China
| | - Mulong Du
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Cancer Biomarkers, Prevention and Treatment, Department of Environmental Genomics, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Personalized Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.,Department of Biostatistics, Center for Global Health, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Nieke Zhang
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Zhongda Hospital of Southeast University, Nanjing, China.,Surgical Research Center, Institute of Urology, Medical School of Southeast University, Nanjing, China
| | - Meiling Wang
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Cancer Biomarkers, Prevention and Treatment, Department of Environmental Genomics, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Personalized Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Bin Xu
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Zhongda Hospital of Southeast University, Nanjing, China.,Surgical Research Center, Institute of Urology, Medical School of Southeast University, Nanjing, China.,Lishui People's Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Ming Chen
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Zhongda Hospital of Southeast University, Nanjing, China.,Surgical Research Center, Institute of Urology, Medical School of Southeast University, Nanjing, China.,Lishui People's Hospital, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
Risk of urinary incontinence (UI) increases with age and can have detrimental effects on patients and caregivers. UI should not be considered a normal part of aging and warrants a comprehensive evaluation. Treatment of UI in the aging male requires special consideration, particularly when it comes to comorbid conditions and potential side effects of intervention. The aim of this review is to discuss the evaluation of, risk factors for, and management of UI in the aging male.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Pearlman
- University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics , Iowa City, United States
| | - Karl Kreder
- University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics , Iowa City, United States
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Spradling K, Deb S, Brubaker WD, Gill H, Conti S. Prostate Artery Embolization Used in the Management of Transfusion-Dependent Hematuria After Prostatic Urethral Lift Procedure in a Patient with Thrombocytopenia: A Case Report. J Endourol Case Rep 2020; 6:238-240. [PMID: 33102736 DOI: 10.1089/cren.2020.0031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The prostatic urethral lift (PUL) procedure is a novel therapeutic method to treat lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Gross hematuria after this procedure has been reported to be mild and transient. This report highlights a case of refractory transfusion-dependent hematuria after the PUL procedure in addition to its management with selective prostatic arterial embolization (PAE). Case Presentation: A 78-year-old Caucasian man with a history of myelodysplastic syndrome, thrombocytopenia, and intermittent urinary retention secondary to BPH underwent a PUL procedure. Before the procedure he received a platelet transfusion making his platelet count 58,000/μL. The day after the procedure he was admitted to a hospital for gross hematuria with clot retention. He was started on continuous bladder irrigation and taken to the operating room for clot evacuation and fulguration of prostate. His thrombocytopenia and anemia were managed with transfusions. He was treated with desmopressin, aminocaproic acid, and intravesical 1% alum without improvement. He returned to the operating room for clot evacuation in addition to photoselective vaporization of the prostate laser ablation of the prostatic fossa. He eventually required a total of four transurethral fulgurations without improvement in transfusion-dependent hematuria. Ultimately, resolution of the hematuria was achieved through bilateral PAE with Embosphere® Microspheres performed by interventional radiology. He was discharged home 2 days after the embolization procedure without recurrence of hematuria or urinary retention at a 6-month follow-up visit. Conclusion: The PUL procedure has been shown to be an effective alternative to more invasive surgical options for LUTS caused by BPH. Despite careful consideration in an attempt to alleviate urinary retention, PUL still resulted in significant bleeding in this patient with thrombocytopenia. This is the first report to highlight the use of bilateral PAE as a method for achieving control of severe refractory hematuria after PUL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyle Spradling
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Sayantan Deb
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - William D Brubaker
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Harcharan Gill
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Simon Conti
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Madersbacher S, Roehrborn CG, Oelke M. The role of novel minimally invasive treatments for lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia. BJU Int 2020; 126:317-326. [DOI: 10.1111/bju.15154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Stephan Madersbacher
- Department of Urology; Kaiser Franz Josef Hospital; Sigmund Freud Private University; Vienna Austria
| | | | - Matthias Oelke
- Department of Urology; St. Antonius Hospital; Gronau Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Xiang P, Wang M, Guan D, Liu D, Wang Y, Hao Y, Li S, Liu Y, Ping H. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prostatic Urethral Lift for Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Secondary to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. EUR UROL SUPPL 2020; 19:3-15. [PMID: 34337448 PMCID: PMC8317884 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2020.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/29/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT Recently, prostatic urethral lift (PUL) is being used to treat lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Although preliminary clinical studies on PUL are increasing, the long-term efficacy and safety of this procedure are still not well evaluated. OBJECTIVE The objective of our study is to synthesize the existing literature evidence, and make a comprehensive and long-term systematic review for the PUL procedure. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A systematic search was performed from the electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, and OVID. The search period was up to January 1, 2020. Comprehensive retrospective and prospective studies on PUL were collected in accordance with specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Pooled prostatic symptom scores, sexual health scores, and functional outcomes were calculated by using a fixed or random-effect model. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Nineteen articles meet our determined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and 11 independent patient series were included in the final analysis. Meta-analysis results indicated improvement after the PUL procedure, including International Prostate Symptom Score improvement of 9.73-12.16 points, BPH Impact Index improvement of 3.74-4.50 points, maximum flow rate improvement of 3.44-4.26 ml/s, and quality of life improvement of 2.20-2.55 points. Postvoid residual volume at most of the intervals was not significantly variable. Data regarding sexual function remained stable or improved slightly during the 24-mo follow-up period. Pooled estimates were largely heterogeneous except for sexual function. CONCLUSIONS PUL can continue to relieve prostatic symptoms for 24 mo without causing serious complications. The extremely important advantage of the PUL procedure is that it can preserve or slightly improve sexual function. Longer-term and more comprehensive clinical trials are still needed to further clarify the functional outcomes and cost effectiveness of PUL. PATIENT SUMMARY Prostatic urethral lift is an attractive option for selected patients who seek rapid and durable relief of lower urinary tract symptoms with complete preservation of sexual function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peng Xiang
- Department of Urology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Mingdong Wang
- Department of Urology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Di Guan
- Department of Urology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Dan Liu
- Department of Urology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yonghui Wang
- Department of Urology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yongxiu Hao
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Shuang Li
- Department of Urology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yuexin Liu
- Department of Urology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Hao Ping
- Department of Urology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
McGuinness LA, Higgins JPT. Risk-of-bias VISualization (robvis): An R package and Shiny web app for visualizing risk-of-bias assessments. Res Synth Methods 2020; 12:55-61. [PMID: 32336025 DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1471] [Impact Index Per Article: 367.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2020] [Revised: 04/16/2020] [Accepted: 04/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Despite a major increase in the range and number of software offerings now available to help researchers produce evidence syntheses, there is currently no generic tool for producing figures to display and explore the risk-of-bias assessments that routinely take place as part of systematic review. However, tools such as the R programming environment and Shiny (an R package for building interactive web apps) have made it straightforward to produce new tools to help in producing evidence syntheses. We present a new tool, robvis (Risk-Of-Bias VISualization), available as an R package and web app, which facilitates rapid production of publication-quality risk-of-bias assessment figures. We present a timeline of the tool's development and its key functionality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luke A McGuinness
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.,Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Julian P T Higgins
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.,Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|