Comparison of nutritional and hydration status in patients undergoing twice and thrice-weekly hemodialysis: a silent drama in developing countries

Mortality associated with the COVID-19 pandemic in the Swiss dialysis population beyond SARS-CoV-2 infection

Background

While SARS-CoV-2 infection has direct obvious consequences on patients undergoing dialysis, the COVID-19 pandemic also had an indirect impact on health systems. Therefore, we aimed to determine whether the COVID-19 era itself was associated with adverse consequences in the Swiss dialysis population as compared to the pre-COVID-19 era, while accounting for direct impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Methods

We retrospectively included all patients recorded in the Swiss dialysis registry from January 2014 to December 2022. The pre-COVID-19 era and the COVID-19 era were defined based on the cut-off date of January 2020. Cox proportional hazard model was used with all-cause mortality as the primary outcome.

Results

The cohort consisted of 7837 patients from 97 dialysis centres. Median age was 68.6 years with 66.1% men. Crude mortality rates were 11.6% (11.0% to 12.2%) and 14.2% (13.4% to 14.9%) person-years for the pre-COVID-19 era and the COVID-19 era, respectively. In multivariable analysis, SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with an increased risk of mortality (HR 4.26, 95% CI 3.65 to 4.97, P < .001) while the COVID-19 era itself was not (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.08, P = .687).

Conclusions

The COVID-19 era was not associated with an excess of mortality in the Swiss dialysis population as compared to the pre-COVID-19 era when accounting for the direct effect of SARS-CoV-2 infection. This suggests that control measures established during the pandemic did not have a negative impact on dialysis patients at the national level. These results could inform health policy makers in the eventuality of future pandemics.

Incremental versus conventional haemodialysis in end-stage kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Appropriate dialysis prescription in the transitional setting from chronic kidney disease to end-stage kidney disease is still challenging. Conventional thrice-weekly haemodialysis (HD) might be associated with rapid loss of residual kidney function (RKF) and high mortality. The benefits and risks of incremental HD compared with conventional HD were explored in this systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE, Scopus and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to April 2023 for studies that compared the impacts of incremental (once- or twice-weekly HD) and conventional thrice-weekly HD on cardiovascular events, RKF, vascular access complications, quality of life, hospitalization and mortality.

Results

A total of 36 articles (138 939 participants) were included in this meta-analysis. The mortality rate and cardiovascular events were similar between incremental and conventional HD {odds ratio [OR] 0.87 [95% confidence interval (CI)] 0.72-1.04 and OR 0.67 [95% CI 0.43-1.05], respectively}. However, hospitalization and loss of RKF were significantly lower in patients treated with incremental HD [OR 0.44 (95% CI 0.27-0.72) and OR 0.31 (95% CI 0.25-0.39), respectively]. In a sensitivity analysis that included studies restricted to those with RKF or urine output criteria, incremental HD had significantly lower cardiovascular events [OR 0.22 (95% CI 0.08-0.63)] and mortality [OR 0.54 (95% CI 0.37-0.79)]. Vascular access complications, hyperkalaemia and volume overload were not statistically different between groups.

Conclusions

Incremental HD has been shown to be safe and may provide superior benefits in clinical outcomes, particularly in appropriately selected patients. Large-scale randomized controlled trials are required to confirm these potential advantages.

Impact of incremental initiation of haemodialysis on mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Incremental haemodialysis initiation entails lower sessional duration and/or frequency than the standard 4 h thrice-weekly approach. Dialysis dose is increased as residual kidney function (RKF) declines. This systematic review evaluates its safety, efficacy and cost-effectiveness.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library databases from inception to 27 February 2022. Eligible studies compared incremental haemodialysis (sessions either fewer than three times weekly or of duration <3.5 h) with standard treatment. The primary outcome was mortality. Secondary outcomes included treatment-emergent adverse events, loss of RKF, quality of life and cost effectiveness. The study protocol was prospectively registered. Risk of bias assessment used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool, as appropriate. Meta-analyses were undertaken in Review Manager, Version 5.4.

RESULTS

A total of 644 records were identified. Twenty-six met the inclusion criteria, including 22 cohort studies and two randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Sample size ranged from 48 to 50 596 participants (total 101 476). We found no mortality differences (hazard ratio = 0.99; 95% CI 0.80-1.24). Cohort studies suggested similar hospitalization rates though the two small RCTs suggested less hospitalization after incremental initiation (relative risk = 0.31; 95% CI 0.18-0.54). Data on other treatment-emergent adverse events and quality of life was limited. Observational studies suggested reduced loss of RKF in incremental haemodialysis. This was not supported by RCT data. Four studies reported reduced costs of incremental treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Incremental initiation of haemodialysis does not confer greater risk of mortality compared with standard treatment. Hospitalization may be reduced and costs are lower.