Implications of local niche- and dispersal-based factors that may influence chironomid assemblages in bioassessment

Seasonal Dynamics and Factors Shaping Aquatic Insect Assemblages in Mountain Streams of the Pannonian Lowland Ecoregion

This study focused on the aquatic insect orders that serve as biological indicators. Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera, Coleoptera, and Odonata were studied with their relationships to physical, chemical, hydrological and morphological variables in 14 streams on three Croatian mountains: Papuk, Medvednica and Psunj. From 675 samples collected in three dominant sediment microhabitats (e.g., macrolithal and mesolithal) in each stream, we identified 130 macroinvertebrate taxa. The most abundant group was Ephemeroptera (36 taxa). Aquatic insect assemblages between Papuk and Psunj showed higher similarity due to the geographical proximity of these two mountains, which is expressed as spatial connectivity. In spring, greater variability and diversity of investigated aquatic insects were observed due to the phenology of studied insects. The combination of environmental and morphological properties (e.g., oxygen concentration and substrate type) had the most significant influence on shaping the assemblage of aquatic insects of Psunj, while morphological properties were the most important in shaping aquatic insect assemblages on Papuk (e.g., streambed width) and Medvednica (e.g., elevation). Baetis sp. was the dominant taxon in summer, Protonemura montana in spring, and Leuctra sp. in autumn. Seasonal shifts in environmental conditions lead to functionally unique communities that utilize the pool of available seasonal resources. The dominance of feeding groups varied by season, with scrapers and collector-gatherers being most prevalent in summer, while shredders were dominant in spring. The results on the relationships between environmental characteristics and species richness, functional structure, and distribution of aquatic insects in mountain streams provide important clues for future research and conservation strategies in these vulnerable ecosystems.

The influence of spatial processes on fish community structure: using a metacommunity framework for freshwater bioassessment

The use of biological indicators in a bioassessment approach is important for inferences of anthropogenic stress in routine monitoring programs. One of the primary assumptions of bioassessment is that biological indicators observed at specific sampling sites will allow for inferences of local environmental quality; however, this assumption requires a reliable understanding of dispersal processes, which is particularly relevant in river systems due to their dendritic network. Inter-stream dispersal between different points of the river network could bias bioassessment, especially for highly mobile organisms like fish. Here, we examine standard biological metrics used in routine biomonitoring to determine how spatial variables, including dispersal, influence inferences between fish populations and environmental gradients. Using redundancy analysis (RDA) and variation partitioning, we tested the relative influence of both environmental and spatial variables on fish community structure and related community metrics. Fish were collected from 99 sampling sites distributed across 44 rivers and streams of the Great Morava River Basin, Serbia. Electroconductivity, the percentage of agricultural areas, dissolved oxygen, ammonia, and nitrate-nitrogen were found to be significant environmental variables, while ten spatial predictors from broad- to small-scales were found to influence fish community structure and community metrics. Our results suggest that contemporary dispersal among streams influences fish community composition, but that trait-based metrics are less sensitive than basic measures of diversity to spatial processes. Our results highlight the need for spatially independent sampling, as well as the need to consider dispersal-based processes in routine biomonitoring.

Progress in understanding the vulnerability of freshwater ecosystems

The ability to collect and synthesize long-term environmental monitoring data is essential for the effective management of freshwater ecosystems. Progress has been made in assessment and monitoring approaches that have integrated routine monitoring programs into more holistic watershed-scale vulnerability assessments. While the concept of vulnerability assessment is well-defined for ecosystems, complementary and sometimes competing concepts of adaptive management, ecological integrity, and ecological condition complicate the communication of results to a broader audience. Here, we identify progress in freshwater assessments that can contribute to the identification and communication of freshwater vulnerability. We review novel methods that address common challenges associated with: 1) a lack of baseline information, 2) variability associated with a spatial context, and 3) the taxonomic sufficiency of biological indicators used to make inferences about ecological conditions. Innovation in methods and communication are discussed as a means to highlight meaningful cost-effective results that target policy towards heuristic ecosystem-management.