Mechanisms of γ-hydroxybutyric acid production during the early postmortem period

[Keep cool! How to inhibit post-mortem production of endogenous GHB?]

Dans le cadre de l’UE « Méthodologie et travail en mode projet » proposé par le Master humanités médicales de la faculté sciences médicales et paramédicales de l’université Aix-Marseille, les étudiants de Master 1 ont été confrontés aux exigences de l’écriture scientifique.

Le Master est construit autour de la pluridisciplinarité et de l’interdisciplinarité, ce qui en fait sa force et son originalité. L’homme est repositionné dans un cadre diachronique et synchronique dans son environnement biologique, écologique, culturel au centre des problématiques de santé publique. Le défi des étudiants a été de choisir des thèmes de science en apportant la coloration sciences humaines et sociales (SHS) qui caractérise leur formation.

Ces nouvelles représentent l’association synergique des SHS et du monde de la santé en mettant en avant certains enjeux sociétaux actuels et futurs tels que les addictions de différentes natures (comportementales ou biologiques), les problématiques éthiques et déontologiques (recherche biomédicale), les épidémies et les maladies du passé (peste, typhus, anémie, etc.) pour répondre aux enjeux de santé publique actuels.

The interest of using vitreous humor for γ-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) quantification in related fatalities: Stability evaluation, case report and literature review

Analysis and interpretation of the findings for γ-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) in related fatalities remains problematic. Indeed, GHB is a naturally occurring compound present in both the mammalian central nervous system and peripheral tissue. Moreover, a postmortem increase in endogenous GHB concentration has been observed, especially in blood. Facing this issue, the use of an alternative matrix such as vitreous humor (VH) can thus be particularly interesting for GHB testing and quantification. VH is considered to be less prone to postmortem redistribution, is easy to collect, and has relatively few interfering compounds for the analytical process. In this context, the authors report the case of a GHB-related fatality involving 22-year-old male. In this case, GHB femoral blood (FB) (790 mg/L) and vitreous (750 mg/L) concentrations appeared similar with a FB to VH (FB/VH) ratio of 1.05. In addition, other similar cases with both GHB blood and vitreous concentrations were reviewed. Five cases were identified. The blood to VH ratios ranging from 0.13 to 2.58. Finally, GHB stability was documented in postmortem blood and VH, in order to address the reliability of VH as an alternative matrix for GHB quantitation at postmortem. GHB appeared relatively stable in postmortem blood specimens (at 50 mg/L) over a period of 28 days when stored at +4 °C or -20 °C. The same results were observed in VH specimens.

Gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB), 1,4-butanediol (1,4BD), and gamma-butyrolactone (GBL) intoxication: A state-of-the-art review

γ-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) is synthesized endogenously from γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) or exogenously from 1,4-butanediol (butane-1,4-diol; 1,4-BD) or γ-butyrolactone (GBL). GBL, and 1,4-BD are rapidly converted to GHB. The gastric absorption time, volume of distribution, and half-life of GHB are between 5 and 45 min, 0.49 ± 0.9 L/kg, and between 20 and 60 min, respectively. GHB and its analogues have a dose-dependent effect on the activation of GHB receptor, GABA-B, and GABA localized to the central nervous system. After ingestion, most patients present transient neurological disorders (lethal dose: 60 mg/kg). Chronic GHB consumption is associated with disorders of use and a withdrawal syndrome when the consumption is discontinued. GHB, GBL, and 1,4-BD are classified as narcotics but only the use of GHB is controlled internationally. They are used for drug facilitated (sexual) assault, recreational purposes, slamsex, and chemsex. To confirm an exogenous intake or administration of GHB, GBL, or 1-4-BD, the pre-analytical conservation is crucial. The antemortem cutoff doses for detection are 5 and 5-15 mg/L, with detection windows of 6 and 10 h in the blood and urine, respectively Control of GHB is essential to limit the number of users, abuse, associated risks, and death related to their consumption.

Endogenous Gamma-Hydroxybutyrate in Postmortem Samples

Gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) is a naturally occurring molecule present in the human body as a catabolite of the neurotransmitter gamma-aminobutyrate (GABA). In the USA, GHB has a history of being manufactured illicitly and abused, with misguided proposed benefits for the body-building community and a persistent party drug with reported GHB overdoses occurring worldwide. The interpretation of GHB in postmortem biological fluids is complicated by the endogenous nature of the molecule. Analysis often requires more than one biological matrix to detect exogenous exposure, typically in urine. The analysis is further complicated by the endogenous de novo production of GHB in postmortem specimens. This work sought to examine the prevalence of endogenous GHB concentrations in postmortem toxicology samples from Orange County, CA, and to establish suitable in-house secondary matrices to confirm or rule out exogenous GHB exposure. A total of 348 postmortem heart blood samples were randomly selected and analyzed for GHB using liquid–liquid extraction followed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry with selective ion monitoring and GHB-d6 as an internal standard. Of the 348 cases analyzed, 39 cases resulted in positive GHB detection with the median concentration of 22.45 mg/L (10.4–62.16 mg/L). None of the positive samples had suspected GHB ingestion or usage from the case report. GHB concentrations were then examined in secondary matrices collected at autopsy from the positive cases that included (when available) peripheral blood, urine, vitreous humor, liver homogenate and brain homogenate. Within the secondary matrices, GHB levels in peripheral blood compared to that of heart blood, while liver homogenate levels were variable. Quantifiable GHB levels were not identified in vitreous humor and brain homogenate samples. Our findings reaffirm the importance of multi-matrix analysis in postmortem toxicology and further confirm the utility of vitreous humor and brain tissue to distinguish exogenous GHB exposure from endogenous production.

[The influence of the packaging on the storage qualities of the volatile substances]

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the storage qualities of the acetone and ethanol aqueous solutions kept in the polyethylene flasks, polypropylene and glass tubes that were stored under different environmental temperature. It was shown that the acetone aqueous solution better retained its properties when stored in glass vials at room temperature as well as at 0° C and 4° C. The most pronounced decrease of acetone concentrations (from 70 up to 95%) was documented after its storage in the polyethylene flasks. The ethanol concentration fell down by 40% when stored in polyethylene flasks at room temperature.

Interpreting γ-hydroxybutyrate concentrations for clinical and forensic purposes

INTRODUCTION

γ-Hydroxybutyric acid is an endogenous substance, a therapeutic agent, and a recreational drug of abuse. This psychoactive substance acts as a depressant of the central nervous system and is commonly encountered in clinical and forensic practice, including impaired drivers, poisoned patients, and drug-related intoxication deaths.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this review is to assist clinical and forensic practitioners with the interpretation of γ-hydroxybutyric acid concentrations in blood, urine, and alternative biological specimens from living and deceased persons.

METHODS

The information sources used to prepare this review were PubMed, Scopus, and Web-of-Science. These databases were searched using keywords γ-hydroxybutyrate (GHB), blood, urine, alternative specimens, non-conventional biological matrices, saliva, oral fluid, sweat, hair, vitreous humor (VH), brain, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), dried blood spots (DBS), breast milk, and various combinations thereof. The resulting 4228 references were screened to exclude duplicates, which left 1980 articles for further consideration. These publications were carefully evaluated by taking into account the main aims of the review and 143 scientific papers were considered relevant. Analytical methods: The analytical methods used to determine γ-hydroxybutyric acid in blood and other biological specimens make use of gas- or liquid-chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. These hyphenated techniques are accurate, precise, and specific for their intended purposes and the lower limit of quantitation in blood and other specimens is 0.5 mg/L or less. Human pharmacokinetics: GHB is rapidly absorbed from the gut and distributes into the total body water compartment. Only a small fraction of the dose (1-2%) is excreted unchanged in the urine. The plasma elimination half-life of γ-hydroxybutyric acid is short, being only about 0.5-0.9 h, which requires timely sampling of blood and other biological specimens for clinical and forensic analysis. Endogenous concentrations of GHB in blood: GHB is both an endogenous metabolite and a drug of abuse, which complicates interpretation of the laboratory results of analysis. Moreover, the concentrations of GHB in blood and other specimens tend to increase after sampling, especially in autopsy cases. This requires the use of practical "cut-off" concentrations to avoid reporting false positive results. These cut-offs are different for different biological specimen types. Concentrations of GHB in clinical and forensic practice: As a recreational drug GHB is predominantly used by young males (94%) with a mean age of 27.1 years. The mean (median) and range of concentrations in blood from apprehended drivers was 90 mg/L (82 mg/L) and 8-600 mg/L, respectively. The concentration distributions in blood taken from living and deceased persons overlapped, although the mean (median) and range of concentrations were higher in intoxication deaths; 640 mg/L (280 mg/L) and 30-9200 mg/L, respectively. Analysis of GHB in alternative specimens: All biological fluids and tissue containing water are suitable for the analysis of GHB. Examples of alternative specimens discussed in this review are CSF, saliva, hair strands, breast milk, DBS, VH, and brain tissue.

CONCLUSIONS

Body fluids for the analysis of GHB must be obtained as quickly as possible after a poisoned patient is admitted to hospital or after a person is arrested for a drug-related crime to enhance chances of detecting the drug. The sampling of urine lengthens the window of detection by 3-4 h compared with blood samples, but with longer delays between last intake of GHB and obtaining specimens, hair strands, and/or nails might be the only option. In postmortem toxicology, the concentrations of drugs tend to be more stable in bladder urine, VH, and CSF compared with blood, because these sampling sites are protected from the spread of bacteria from the gut. Accordingly, the relationship between blood and urine concentrations of GHB furnishes useful information when drug intoxication deaths are investigated.

Determination of γ-hydroxybutyrate (GHB), β-hydroxybutyrate (BHB), pregabalin, 1,4-butane-diol (1,4BD) and γ-butyrolactone (GBL) in whole blood and urine samples by UPLC-MSMS

The demand of high throughput methods for the determination of gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) and its precursors gamma-butyrolactone (GBL) and 1,4-butane-diol (1,4BD) as well as for pregabalin is increasing. Here we present two analytical methods using ultra-high pressure liquid chromatography (UPLC) and tandem mass spectrometric (MS/MS) detection for the determination of GHB, beta-hydroxybutyrate (BHB), pregabalin, 1,4BD and GBL in whole blood and urine. Using the 96-well formate, the whole blood method is a simple high-throughput method suitable for screening of large sample amounts. With an easy sample preparation for urine including only dilution and filtration of the sample, the method is suitable for fast screening of urine samples. Both methods showed acceptable linearity, acceptable limits of detection, and limits of quantification. The within-day and between-day precisions of all analytes were lower than 10% RSD. The analytes were extracted from matrices with recoveries near 100%, and no major matrix effects were observed. Both methods have been used as routine screening analyses of whole blood and urine samples since January 2010.