A Comparison of Femoral Lengthening Methods Favors the Magnetic Internal Lengthening Nail When Compared with Lengthening Over a Nail

Accuracy and precision of in vitro EOS imaging compared to digital radiographs in the measurement of intramedullary lengthening

OBJECTIVES

Accurate limb length measurement is essential during limb lengthening procedures to prevent neurologic and musculoskeletal complications. Magnetic intramedullary lengthening nails (MILN) rely on radiographs for measurement, but the optimal radiographic technique is not established. This study evaluated the precision and accuracy of EOS imaging versus digital radiography, including calibration techniques and measurement techniques for assessing intramedullary lengthening.

METHODS

An MILN was inserted into a Sawbones femur, and lengthening measurements from digital X-ray and EOS imaging were compared to external remote control (ERC) results. Measurements were taken with and without calibration using a magnification ball, nail width, or female nail length. Four observers measured the distraction gap, spindle length, full nail length, and male nail length at various hip flexion angles. Precision and accuracy were calculated for each technique.

RESULTS

From 576 measurements, EOS imaging demonstrated significantly higher accuracy than digital radiography (83.6% vs. 73.5% absolute accuracy; p < 0.001) when non-calibrated values were included. EOS maintained superior accuracy at 30 mm, 50 mm, and 70 mm of lengthening (p < 0.05), with no difference at 10 mm. Calibration did not affect EOS accuracy, whereas digital radiography was less accurate without calibration (p < 0.001). Distraction gap measurement was the most accurate for both modalities, and 0° hip flexion provided the highest precision. Overall, EOS was more precise (79.4% vs. 71.7% precision rates; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

EOS imaging is recommended for limb lengthening measurements due to its superior precision and accuracy. For digital radiographs, careful calibration is essential to achieve accurate measurements.

Impact of lower limb lengthening with telescopic nails on functionality and quality of life in patients with achondroplasia

INTRODUCTION

The short stature characteristic of patients with achondroplasia can negatively affect health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Lower limb lengthening reusing telescopic intramedullary nails (TIMNs) offers an alternative to external fixators, with the potential to enhance functionality, self-esteem, and HRQoL, while reducing complication risks, which this study aims to evaluate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included nine patients with achondroplasia who underwent parallel transverse lengthening of femurs and/or tibias reusing a TIMN between 2015 and 2022. Functionality (Lower Extremity Functional Scale, LEFS), self-esteem (Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale), and HRQoL (Short Form-12, SF-12, and EuroQol VAS) were assessed preoperatively and at least two years post-surgery. Complications (Clavien-Dindo-Sink classification) and patient satisfaction were also recorded.

RESULTS

The median age was 13.5 years (IQR: 12.5-17.1), with a significant height increase of +19.9cm +19.9cm (p<0.05). Improvements were significant in functionality (LEFS, +4.6 points; p<0.05), self-esteem (Rosenberg, +3.7 points; p<0.05), and HRQoL (SF-12 physical, +8.9 points; p<0.05; EQ-VAS, +20 points; p<0.05). A total of 22 complications were reported in 32 treated bones, most classified as grade 2 or 3B, with no significant correlation to functionality, HRQoL, or self-esteem outcomes (p>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Lower limb lengthening reusing TIMNs appears to improve functionality, HRQoL, and self-esteem in patients with achondroplasia compared to their preoperative status. High patient satisfaction and manageable complications were observed, with no negative impact on outcomes, laying the groundwork for future studies.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Intramedullary Lengthening Nails vs. Alternative Techniques for Femoral Limb Lengthening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Limb lengthening procedures are performed for various indications, including limb length discrepancies (LLDs) and short stature. This systematic review and meta-analysis compares the efficacy and safety of the newer motorized intramedullary lengthening nails (MILNs) with the traditional alternative techniques (ATs) for femoral limb lengthening.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive literature search in the Medline, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Scopus databases, inclusive of all dates through July 1, 2023, and without language restrictions. Factors mediating outcomes included problems, obstacles, complications, total adverse events, healing/consolidation index, time to full weight-bearing, lengthening accuracy, percentage of lengthening goal achieved, and duration of hospital stay. Effect sizes were quantified using STATA 17.0. Statistical algorithms employed were random effects model standardized mean differences (SMDs) for continuous outcomes and log risk ratios (RRs) for dichotomous outcomes, both with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Our meta-analysis included 10 studies comparing MILN with AT: 180 femurs in the MILN group and 160 femurs in the AT group. This was exclusively comprised of retrospective cohort studies. When compared with AT, limb lengthening procedures utilizing MILNs had significantly lower problems (log RR, -1.35; 95% CI, -1.93 to -0.77; p < 0.001), complications (log RR, -0.56; 95% CI, -0.90 to -0.22; p = 0.001), and total adverse events (log RR, -0.69; 95% CI, -1.17 to -0.21; p = 0.005), as well as a superior bone healing index (SMD, -0.80; 95% CI, -1.32 to -0.28; p = 0.003). However, no significant differences were found in obstacles, percentage of lengthening goal achieved, lengthening accuracy, time to full weight-bearing, and duration of hospital stay.

CONCLUSION

Limb lengthening with MILNs vs. AT may offer more favorable patient outcomes, lowering risk for problems, complications, and total adverse events, while optimizing the bone healing/consolidation index. However, the limitation of nonrandomized retrospective studies and high heterogeneity should be acknowledged.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II (meta-analysis of cohort studies). See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Femoral Lengthening in Children with Congenital Femoral Deficiency: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Congenital femoral deficiency (CFD) presents a significant challenge in pediatric orthopaedics, characterized by a spectrum of congenital anomalies ranging from mild femoral shortening to complete absence of the proximal femur and hip joint. This review aims at reviewing the latest concepts of femoral limb lengthening modalities in treating CFD, to explore the efficacy, complications, and long-term outcomes of various surgical techniques.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of the literature was performed for clinical studies involving lengthening in patients with proximal focal femoral deficiency (PFFD) in several databases.

RESULTS

We analyze the evolution of limb lengthening procedures, from the Wagner and Ilizarov methods to the latest advancements in distraction osteogenesis, and assess their role in addressing the functional needs of patients. We also analyze the possible risk factors for the occurrence of complications with each method and alternatives to avoid them.

CONCLUSION

The review highlights the importance of individualized treatment plans, considering factors such as the degree of femoral deficiency and the potential for achieving a functional limb length; however, it requires a multidisciplinary approach and careful preoperative planning to optimize patient outcomes. The review underlines the need for ongoing research to refine surgical techniques and to compare them and improve the quality of life for individuals with PFFD.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Clinical compatibility of magnetic resonance imaging with magnetic intramedullary nails: a feasibility study

INTRODUCTION

The use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with a magnetic intramedullary lengthening nail in place is contraindicated per the manufacturer due to the concern of implant activation and migration. A prior in vitro study did not confirm these complications only noting that a 3.0 T MRI weakened the internal magnet. Therefore, a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent an MRI with a magnetic nail in place was performed to determine if any adverse effects occurred in the clinical setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients who underwent an MRI with a magnetic lengthening nail in place was performed. The time spent being imaged in the MRI, number of times the patient entered the MRI suite, and the images obtained were recorded. Radiographs were performed before and after the MRI to determine if any hardware complications occurred. The patients were monitored for any adverse symptoms while they were in the suite.

RESULTS

A total of 12 patients with 13 nails were identified. Two patients underwent imaging with a 3.0 T MRI while the remaining 10 underwent imaging with a 1.5 T MRI. Each patient entered the MRI suite 2.1 times and spent an average of 84.7 min being imaged in the MRI (range 21-494). No patients noted any adverse symptoms related to the nail while in the suite and no hardware complications were identified.

CONCLUSION

MRI appears to be safe with a magnetic nail in place and did not result in any complications. Given the manufacturer's recommendations, informed consent should be obtained prior to an MRI being performed and a 3.0 T MRI should be avoided when possible if further activation of the nail is required.

Evaluation of simultaneous bilateral femoral distraction osteogenesis with antegrade intramedullary lengthening nails in achondroplasia with rhizomelic short stature: a retrospective study of 15 patients with a minimum follow-up of 2 years

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Bilateral femoral distraction osteogenesis in patients with achondroplasia is insufficiently reported. We aimed to perform the first study that exclusively analyzed simultaneous bilateral femoral distraction osteogenesis with motorized intramedullary lengthening nails via an antegrade approach in patients with achondroplasia focused on reliability, accuracy, precision, and the evolving complications.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this retrospective singlecenter study we analyzed patients with achondroplasia who underwent simultaneous bilateral femoral lengthening with antegrade intramedullary lengthening nails between October 2014 and April 2019. 15 patients (30 femoral segments) of median age 14 years (interquartile range [IQR] 12-15) were available for analysis. The median follow-up was 29 months (IQR 27-37) after nail implantation.

RESULTS

The median distraction length per segment was 49 mm (IQR 47-51) with a median distraction index of 1.0 mm/day (IQR 0.9-1.0), and a median consolidation index of 20 days/cm (IQR 17-23). Reliability of the lengthening nails was 97% and their calculated accuracy and precision were 96% and 95%, respectively. The most common complication was temporary restriction of knee range of motion during distraction in 10 of 30 of the lengthened segments. 1 patient was treated with 2 unplanned additional surgeries due to premature consolidation.

CONCLUSION

The method is reliable and accurate with few complications.

Staged Extra-Articular Deformity Correction in the Setting of Total Knee Arthroplasty

Background

Extra-articular lower-leg deformities mandate unique considerations when planning total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Poor limb alignment may increase perioperative complications and cause early implant failure. This study reports on the safety and efficacy of staged, extra-articular deformity correction about the knee in the setting of osteoarthritis and TKA.

Methods

A retrospective review was conducted from December 2007 to December 2019 identifying 30 deformities in 27 patients (average age: 52.7 years; range 31-74) who underwent staged surgical correction of extra-articular deformity in preparation for TKA. Patient demographics, surgical details, clinical and radiographic measurements, severity of knee arthritis, and complications were collected.

Results

There were 17 femur and 12 tibia deformities. There was an average improvement of 14.7° of deformity measured in the coronal plane and 12.7° of deformity in the sagittal plane in the femur and 13.5° in the coronal plane and 10.3° in the sagittal plane in the tibia. Leg length discrepancies improved by 26 mm on average (1-100 mm). After an average 3.1-year follow-up, 12 out of 27 patients proceeded with primary or revision TKA. There were no cases of blood transfusion, nerve palsy, or compartment syndrome, and all patients achieved bony union.

Conclusions

Staged, extra-articular deformity correction is a safe and effective approach to improve limb alignment in the setting of knee osteoarthritis and TKA.

Trends and Practices in Limb Lengthening: An 11-year US Database Study

Aim

Over the past couple of decades, limb lengthening has evolved to encompass various implants and techniques. The purpose of this study was to (1) determine trends in the utilisation of various limb lengthening techniques for the femur and tibia in the United States, (2) determine trends in 1-year readmission rate following limb lengthening procedures and (3) to study the relationship of limb lengthening implant used and payment method used with the underlying diagnosis associated with limb shortening.

Materials and methods

Inpatient data were acquired using the Healthcare Cost and Utilisation Project (HCUP) database from 2005 to 2015 from seven states in the United States. Patients with an International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9 code for limb lengthening of the femur or tibia were included. A total of 2,563 patients were included. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, and chi-square test was used for comparison of subcategories. Linear regression analysis was used to examine trends over time.

Results

There was a strong linear trend towards increasing proportional use of internal lengthening of the femur from 2011 to 2015 (R2 = 0.99) with an increase of 10.2% per year. A similar trend towards increasing proportional use of internal lengthening of the tibia was seen from 2011 to 2015 (R2 = 0.87) with an increase of 4.9% per year. There was a moderate correlation showing a decrease in readmission rate of 1.07% per year from 2005 to 2015 (R2 = 0.55). Patients with short stature had increased use of internal lengthening and self-payment compared to patients with congenital, post-traumatic or other diagnoses.

Conclusion

There was increasing use of internal lengthening techniques from 2011 to 2015. Patients with short stature had higher use of internal lengthening technique and self-pay for payment method.

Clinical significance

Intramedullary devices have seen increasing use for limb lengthening procedures. Lengthening technique and payment method may differ by underlying diagnosis.

How to cite this article

Mittal A, Allahabadi S, Jayaram R, et al. Trends and Practices in Limb Lengthening: An 11-year US Database Study. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2023;18(1):21-31.

STRYDE versus PRECICE magnetic internal lengthening nail for femur lengthening

INTRODUCTION

Magnetic internal lengthening nails (MILNs) have been used for femoral lengthening to avoid complications associated with external fixation. The titanium version of the MILN (PRECICE®) has been in use since 2011 but had limitations (50-75 lb) in post-operative weight bearing. A new stainless-steel version of the MILN (STRYDE®) allows 150-250 lb of post-operative weight bearing. The aim is to compare the outcomes of using these two different MILNs for both unilateral and bilateral femoral lengthening.

METHODS

A single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted in which patients' records were reviewed from the period from January 2017 to March 2020. A total of 66 femoral lengthening procedures were included in the study and were divided into two groups: STRYDE® group (30 femora) and PRECICE® group (36 femora). Outcomes assessed were the 6-months post-operative Limb Deformity-Scoliosis Research Society (LD-SRS) Score, adjacent joint range of motion (ROM), average distraction rate, bone healing index (BHI), and complications.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in regard to the (LD-SRS) score, hip ROM, or knee ROM. Statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in regard to BHI (average of 0.84 months/cm and 0.67 months/cm for STRYDE® and PRECICE®, respectively) and distraction rate (average of 0.6 mm/day and 0.9 mm/day for STRYDE® and PRECICE®, respectively). No mechanical nail complications were reported in the STRYDE® group compared to three events of nail failure in the PRECICE® group. One femur in the PRECICE® group needed BMAC injection for delayed healing compared to four femurs in the STRYDE® group.

CONCLUSION

The STRYDE® MILN yields comparable functional results to those of PRECICE® MILN and shows fewer mechanical nail complications. However, STRYDE® MILN requires a slower distraction rate and yields slower healing (larger BHI).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, Therapeutic study.

An update on the intramedullary implant in limb lengthening: A quinquennial review Part 1: The further influence of the intramedullary nail in limb lengthening

The goal of limb lengthening is to restore length to bone, safely stretch soft tissues and improve quality of life with minimal complications. Traditionally this was achieved with the use of external fixators, associated with complications related to pin site tethering and infections, joint stiffness and regenerate deformity and fracture following frame removal. The duration of treatment also impacts on patient mental health and well-being. In order to reduce external fixator time, intramedullary nails have been introduced as an adjunct, either at the initial surgery or after completion of lengthening. Complications related to the external fixator still remained and innovation has led to the popularisation of the intramedullary lengthening nail. The lengthening mechanism of the nail can be divided into those with ratchet systems and those driven by motors. In the ratchet group, patients are required to manually rotate their limb, with movement at the osteotomy site, in order to create forward movement. This was often associated with pain, and in some cases led to the requirement of general anaesthesia to enable rotation and continuation of lengthening. Further issues were reported related to lengthening rate control. Once the nail had lengthened sufficiently for the osteotomy to disengage, rapid lengthening termed a 'runaway' nail could occur. The nails were limited to forward movement, and once length was gained it could not be retracted, leading to poor regenerate formation and soft tissue contractures. The introduction of the Fitbone implant utilised a transcutaneous electrical conduit, powered by a high frequency electrical signal, enabling more control over the lengthening. The Precice intramedullary lengthening system is controlled by the use of an external device with two rotating neodymium magnets, which produce rotation of a third magnet in the nail. By altering the direction of the magnet rotation, the lengthening can be controlled both forwards and backwards with sub-millimetre precision. Following initial excellent outcomes published, the use of the lengthening intramedullary nail has become accepted by many as the implant of choice in limb lengthening. The aim of this article comes in two parts. The first to highlight the latest research and clinical results in the last five years using an intramedullary implant during limb lengthening, and the second to report the outcome in extended surgical indications and further implant innovation.

What Factors Correlate With Length of Stay and Readmission After Limb Lengthening Procedures? A Large-database Study

BACKGROUND

Indications and techniques for limb lengthening procedures have evolved over the past two decades. Although there are several case series reporting on the complications and efficacy of these techniques, limited data are available on length of stay and hospital readmission rates after these procedures.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What is the median length of stay after lower limb lengthening procedures, and is variability in patient demographics, preoperative diagnosis, and surgical technique associated with length of stay? (2) What is the 1-year readmission rate after lower limb lengthening procedures? (3) Is variability in patient demographics, preoperative diagnosis, and surgical technique associated with varying rates of hospital readmission?

METHODS

Patients who underwent femoral or tibial lengthening from 2005 to 2015 in seven states were identified using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) State Inpatient Databases. These databases include a large, diverse group of patients across a wide range of hospitals and socioeconomic backgrounds with inclusion of patients regardless of payer. Between 2005 and 2015, there were 3979 inpatient admissions that were identified as involving femoral and/or tibial lengthening procedures based on ICD-9 procedure codes; of those, 2% (97 of 3979) of the inpatient admissions were excluded from analysis because they had ICD-9 procedure codes for primary or revision hip or knee arthroplasty, and 10% (394 of 3979) of the inpatient admissions were excluded because they involved repeated admissions of patients with previous hospitalization data within the database. This yielded 3488 patients for analysis. The median (interquartile range) age of patients was 18 years (12 to 41), and 42% (1481 of 3488) of patients were women. A total of 49% (1705 of 3469) of patients were children (younger than 18 years), 19% (675 of 3469) were young adults (18 to 34 years), 24% (817 of 3469) were adults (35 to 59 years), and 8% (272 of 3469) were seniors (60 years and older). Length of stay and rates of readmission at 1 year after the lengthening procedure were calculated. Univariate analysis was performed to examine associations between age, race, payment method, underlying diagnosis, bone lengthened, and lengthening technique with length of stay and readmission rate. Factors found to be significantly associated with the outcome variables (p < 0.05) were further examined with a multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Included patients had a median (IQR) length of hospital stay of 3 days (2 to 4). Given the poor explanatory power of the multivariate model for length of stay (R 2 = 0.03), no meaningful correlations could be drawn between age, race, underlying diagnosis, lengthening technique, and length of stay. The overall 1-year readmission rate was 35% (1237 of 3488). There were higher readmission rates among adult patients compared with pediatric patients (odds ratio 1.78 [95% confidence interval 1.46 to 2.18]; p < 0.001), patients with government insurance compared with commercial insurance (OR 1.28 [95% CI 1.05 to 1.54]; p = 0.01), and patients undergoing lengthening via external fixation (OR 1.61 [95% CI 1.29 to 2.02]; p < 0.001) or hybrid fixation (OR 1.81 [95% CI 1.38 to 2.37]; p < 0.001) compared with lengthening with internal fixation only.

CONCLUSION

When counseling patients who may be candidates for limb lengthening, providers should inform individual patients and their caretakers on the anticipated length of hospital stay and likelihood of hospital readmission based on our findings. Adult patients, those with government insurance, and patients undergoing hybrid or external fixator limb lengthening procedures should be advised that they are at greater risk for hospital readmission. The relationship of specific patient-related factors (such as severity of deformity or associated comorbidities) and treatment-related variables (such as amount of lengthening, compliance with physical therapy, or surgeon's experience) with clinical outcomes after lower limb lengthening and the burden of care associated with hospital readmission needs further study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Changes in the femoral osteotomy level coefficient and neck shaft angle during limb lengthening with an intramedullary magnetic nail

BACKGROUND

The intramedullary magnetic IM nail enables bone graduated distraction. Proximal femur osteotomies for ante grade IM lengthening nails have a tendency towards varus-procurvatum malalignment. We examined the effect of the level of the osteotomy and of trochanteric versus piriformis entry points on the neck shaft angle (NSA) during lengthening with the PRECICE IM magnetic nail.

METHODS

A novel parameter, the osteotomy level coefficient (OLC), was introduced as a guide to determine the level of an osteotomy at the proximal femur. The OLC was defined as the ratio between the distances from the tip of the greater trochanter to the osteotomy divided by the full length of the femur. A retrospective review of all femoral lengthening procedures with the PRECICE ante grade IM lengthening nail between 2013 and 2018 was carried out.

RESULTS

31 femurs were lengthened in 30 patients (16 males and 14 females, mean age at surgery years 17.1. The average amount of lengthening was 4.4 cm. Trochanteric entry points were used in 24 femurs, and piriformis entry points in seven femurs. The OLC values ranged from 0.16 to 0.34 (average 0.25). The average follow-up period was 10.15 months. The distraction index average 10.5 days/cm (Range 8.6-11.9), Consolidation index 32.1 days/cm (14.3-51.9). The average post-operative NSA was significantly reduced from 133.5º to 128.5º [t (31) = 5.57, p = 0.000]. There was no correlation between the OLC and the change in the NSAs. The trochanteric entry point showed a greater tendency to reduce the NSA (Mdif = - 6, SD = 4.8) compared to the piriformis entry point (Mdif =  - 0.86, SD = 2.27) [t (31) = -3.96, p = 0.001].

CONCLUSION

Proximal femur lengthening with the PRECICE IM nail significantly reduced the NSA and might cause Varus deformity. The level of osteotomy by OLC did not influence the amount of NSA reduction. The trochanteric entry points have a greater tendency to reduce the NSA compared to the piriformis entry points.

Two-stage Bone Lengthening With Reuse of a Single Intramedullary Telescopic Nail in Patients With Achondroplasia

BACKGROUND

Patients with achondroplasia may benefit from limb-lengthening surgery with telescopic intramedullary nails (TIMNs). However, the 5-cm maximum length of the nails used in these patients in their original design may be insufficient. The aim of this research is to analyze the outcomes and complications after reusing the same TIMN for a second consecutive 5-cm lengthening in patients with achondroplasia.

METHODS

Retrospective study of 26 bones (16 femurs and 10 tibias) in 9 patients with achondroplasia treated for bilateral 2-stage sequential lengthening reusing the same TIMN. On completion of a first stage of 5 cm of elongation, the nail was unlocked, retracted, and re-locked; a second stage of 5 cm of distraction followed. Radiologic and clinical parameters were measured preoperatively and postoperatively, and complications were recorded.

RESULTS

The median age of patients at first surgery was 13.54 (12.9 to 16.3) years; 55% were males. The median preoperative height was 121 (117.5 to 127) cm, and the median healing index was 18.12 (14.5 to 32.8) and 26.96 (23.3 to 31.6) d/cm, while time to weight bearing was 185.5 (144.8 to 308.5) and 242.5 (208.5 to 293.8) days for femurs and tibias, respectively. Major complications included 3 cases of moderate ankle equinus, 2 cases of hardware failure (failure to relengthen), 2 premature consolidations, 1 common peroneal neurapraxia, and 2 valgus deformities. Femoral procedures had significantly fewer complications than tibial interventions (7 vs. 15, P=0.03), whereas patients who underwent lengthening of both the femur and tibia did not have significantly higher complication rates (14 vs. 8, P=0.6).

CONCLUSIONS

This study analyzes lower-limb lengthening in a series of achondroplastic patients using TIMN with the novelty of nail reuse to relengthen the bone. The complication rate found is acceptable, among which, potential damage to the internal lengthening mechanism must be considered, though this complication can usually be easily resolved. Overall, nail reuse seems advisable in cases where bone elongation is indicated, and the size and design of the nail limits the extent of lengthening.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study, before and after intervention.

What Are the Potential Benefits and Risks of Using Magnetically Driven Antegrade Intramedullary Lengthening Nails for Femoral Lengthening to Treat Leg Length Discrepancy?

BACKGROUND

Limb lengthening with magnetically driven intramedullary lengthening nails is a fast-developing field and represents an alternative to external fixators. Although previous studies have assessed the application of magnetically driven intramedullary lengthening nails, these studies have been heterogenous regarding the nailing approach, the bone treated, and the implant type; they also have analyzed relatively small patient groups at short follow-up durations.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Is femoral lengthening with magnetically driven antegrade intramedullary lengthening nails accurate and precise? (2) What are the most common complications of treatment? (3) What factors are associated with unplanned additional surgery?

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the longitudinally maintained database of our orthopaedic teaching hospital to identify all patients who underwent surgery for leg length discrepancy (LLD) between October 2014 and April 2019. In total, we surgically treated 323 patients for LLD of 2 cm or more. Of those 55% (177 of 323) were treated with distraction osteogenesis with magnetically driven intramedullary lengthening nails, 18% (59 of 323) with external fixation, and 27% (87 of 323) with epiphysiodesis around the knee. Based on that, 29% (93 of 323) of patients underwent unilateral femoral distraction osteogenesis with magnetically driven antegrade femoral lengthening nails and were eligible for analysis. No patient was excluded, and 3% (3 of 93) were lost before the minimum study follow-up of 2 years, leaving 97% (90 of 93) for analysis. Patients with a distal femoral deformity were treated via a retrograde femoral approach (10% [33 of 323]) or with external fixators (3% [10 of 323]) and were not included in this study. Distraction osteogenesis with magnetically driven intramedullary lengthening nails was not considered for patients with deep tissue infection, those with bone dimensions considered to be too small in relation to the available implants, and for patients younger than 8 years. This study included 90 patients (44 females, 43 left femora) treated for a median (interquartile range) preoperative LLD of 39 mm (32 to 52) at a median age of 15 years (14 to 17). The same limb lengthening system was applied in all patients. The median (IQR) follow-up was 35 months (24 to 78). Data were acquired through a chart review performed by someone not involved in the surgical care of the included patients. Data acquisition was supervised and curated by two of the involved surgeons. Accuracy was calculated as 100 - [(achieved distraction in mm - planned distraction in mm) / (planned distraction in mm) x 100] and precision as 100 - (relative standard deviation of accuracy). Treatment-associated complications were summarized descriptively and characterized as complications resulting in unplanned additional surgery or those not resulting in unplanned surgery. To analyze the risk of unplanned additional surgery by entity, we calculated odds ratios (ORs) comparing the incidence of unplanned additional surgery in the different entity cohorts with the idiopathic LLD cohort as a reference. By calculating ORs, we analyzed the risk for unplanned additional surgery depending on sex, age, surgery time, and previous lengthening. Due to the lack of long-term evidence about motorized lengthening nails remaining in situ and concerns about potential implant-related adverse effects, removal was routinely scheduled 1 year after consolidation. For implant removal, 92% (83 of 90) of patients underwent planned additional surgery, which was not recorded as an adverse event of the treatment. Ninety-seven percent (87 of 90) of patients completed lengthening with the implant remaining in situ until the end of distraction. The median (IQR) distraction length was 37 mm (30 to 45) with a median distraction index of 0.9 mm/day (0.7 to 1.0) and median consolidation index of 31 days/cm (25 to 42).

RESULTS

The calculated accuracy and precision were 94% and 90%, respectively. In total, 76% (68 of 90) of our patients experienced complications, which resulted in 20% (18 of 90) of patients undergoing unplanned additional surgery. The most common complication overall was adjustment of the distraction rate in 27% (24 of 90) of patients (faster: 16% [14 of 90]; slower: 11% [10 of 90]) and temporary restriction of knee motion, which occurred in 20% (18 of 90) of our patients and resolved in all patients who experienced it. The most serious complications were bacterial osteomyelitis and knee subluxation, which occurred in 3% (3 of 90) and 1% (1 of 90) of our patients, respectively. With the numbers available, we found only one factor associated with an increased likelihood of unplanned additional surgery: Patients with postinfectious LLD had higher odds of unplanned additional surgery than patients with idiopathic LLD (7% [1 of 15] versus 50% [3 of 6], OR 14.0 [95% CI 1.06 to 185.49]; p = 0.02). However, we caution readers this finding is fragile, and the confidence interval suggests that the effect size estimate is likely to be imprecise.

CONCLUSION

Femoral distraction osteogenesis with magnetically driven antegrade intramedullary lengthening nails appears to be an accurate and reliable treatment for femoral lengthening. However, depending on the etiology, a high risk of unplanned additional surgery should be anticipated, and a high proportion of patients will experience temporary joint stiffness. We recommend close orthopaedic follow-up and physiotherapy during treatment. This treatment of LLD can be considered alongside other nails, external fixators, and epiphysiodesis. Multicenter studies comparing this with other approaches are needed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study.

Malunion of the Tibia: A Systematic Review

Background and Objectives: Tibial malunions are defined as tibial fractures that have healed in a clinically unacceptable position, resulting in deformity such as shortening, lengthening, abnormal rotation, or angulation. These deformities can have adverse effects on patients, such as pain and gait disturbance, as well as long term development of post-traumatic arthritis. This paper seeks to highlight some of the options for surgical management of malunions and detail the strategies and approaches used to manage these complicated cases. Materials and Methods: An exhaustive search was conducted on PubMed using the key search terms “Tibial” OR “Tibia” AND “Malunion” to be included in the title. Exclusions to the search included any article with patients aged < 18 years, any nonhuman subjects, and any article not published or translated into English. Results: A systematic review of the literature revealed 26 articles encompassing 242 patients who had undergone surgical correction for tibia malunion. A total of 19 patients suffered from complications. Methods of treatment included osteotomies, with plate and screws, external fixator, angled blade plate, intramedullary nails, Ilizarov fixator, Taylor Spatial Frame, Precise nail, and total knee arthroplasty. Restoring alignment and the articular surface led to overwhelmingly positive patient outcomes. Conclusions: Tibial malunions take many forms, and as such, there are many approaches to correcting deformities. The literature supports the following radiological parameters to diagnose tibial malunion: 5−10 degrees angulation, 1−2 cm shortening, 10−15 degrees internal rotation, and 10−20 degrees external rotation. Surgical plans should be customized to each individual patient, as there are many approaches to tibial malunion that have been shown to be successful in delivering excellent clinical outcomes.

Are internal lengthening devices effective and associated with less complications compared to other lengthening devices? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Internal lengthening devices became more popular than external fixators. This was attributed to their effectiveness and lower complication rates. However, this is an assumption that is not on the basis of solid scientific evidence. Therefore, this study systematically reviewed the quality and strength of evidence supporting femoral internal lengthening devices' effectiveness and their associated complications. Six electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane, Sage, Embase, Web of Science and Scopus) were searched from inception until 20 June 2020. Further, all included articles' bibliographies were searched manually. After screening of retrieved articles, five studies were eligible for qualitative and quantitative synthesis. Studies were assessed by two independent assessors using a modified 'assessment of the methodological quality both of randomized and nonrandomized studies of health care interventions'. Further, meta-analysis was conducted to compare the procedure's effectiveness, in terms of healing index and major complications incidence. Our findings showed internal validity as the major source of bias whereas external validity was the least. For healing index, there is limited evidence that internal lengthening devices lower healing index by 0.45 months/cm (95% CI, -0.62 to -0.28; P < 0.01) compared to LON/external fixators. The incidence of major complications, that were directly related to the procedures, did not differ between internal lengthening devices and other fixators (risk ratio=0.97; 95% CI, 0.39-2.44; P < 0.95). This review provides evidence that supports lower healing index and similar complications associated with internal lengthening devices compared to other procedures of femoral lengthening. However, the evidence is very limited to draw a solid conclusion.

Use of a Motorized Intramedullary Bone Transport Nail for Trauma: Tips, Tricks, Corticotomy Techniques, and Rate and Rhythm

The introduction of internal magnetic nails (IMNs) for bone lengthening and bone transport has given us exciting new tools with which to treat segmental bone loss. Distraction osteogenesis has a long record of success in recreating even large segments of bone, but the availability of IMNs now offers the possibility of performing distraction osteogenesis without the drawbacks of external fixation. However, there are aspects of treatment with IMNs that are critical to understand to achieve success and minimize complications. These include assessment of feasibility in relation to available bone stock and segment configuration, the condition of the soft tissue envelope, and the presence of contamination or infection. They also include execution aspects such as bone end preparation, nail placement, need for and positioning of adjuvant fixation, corticotomy techniques, rate and rhythm of distraction, staged screw exchange, docking site preparation, and nail extraction. We discuss these issues in detail and introduce some novel techniques not previously described including the comminuted wedge osteotomy, testing of the nail with initial compression, and retention plug application for nail extraction to assist in optimizing success in certain clinical situations.

Internal Magnetic Lengthening and Reconstruction with Free TRAM Flap After Traumatic Transfemoral Amputation: A Case Report

CASE

This is a case of a 41-year-old man who sustained a traumatic proximal transfemoral amputation with loss of adductor function and inadequate soft tissue. Wound closure was achieved with split-thickness skin grafting. Subsequently, femoral lengthening was achieved with an internal magnetic lengthening nail. He underwent a free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap to resurface the limb and provide more stable soft tissue, adductor repair, and further lengthening because of his prominent abduction contracture and inadequate soft tissue. This allowed independent ambulation with a prosthetic.

CONCLUSION

Femoral lengthening with soft-tissue reconstruction improved prosthetic function and ambulation in a patient with a short transfemoral amputation.

Pediatric Lower Limb Lengthening Using the PRECICE Nail: Our Experience With 50 Cases

BACKGROUND

Limb lengthening using intramedullary externally controlled motorized devices is becoming increasingly popular. There is limited literature regarding their use in the pediatric and adolescent population. This study reviews outcomes on 50 consecutive cases of intramedullary lower limb lengthening surgery in this population.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all pediatric and adolescent patients treated in our institution by intramedullary lengthening for lower limb length discrepancy using the PRECICE and STRYDE intramedullary lengthening nails between 2013 and 2019. All patients were operated by a single surgeon. Data were prospectively recorded. We report on nail accuracy and reliability, consolidation index, time to full weight-bearing from completion of lengthening, joint range of movement, ASAMI bone and functional scores, presence of problems, obstacles and complications, and patient reported outcome measures (PROMS).

RESULTS

Fifty cases (43 femoral and 7 tibial nails) were performed in 42 patients (20 males, 48% and 22 females, 52%). Six patients had bilateral lengthening and 2 patients had sequential lengthening. There were 28 antegrade femoral, 13 retrograde femoral and 5 tibia PRECICE nails, 2 tibial and 2 femoral PRECICE STRYDE nails. Mean age at surgery was 15 years old (12 to 17). Mean preoperative length discrepancy was 49 mm (20 to 90). Mean achieved lengthening was 46.5 mm (20 to 80). Mean percentage lengthening was 12.6% (5% to 25%). Nail accuracy was 96% and reliability 90%. Average distraction rate was 0.92 mm/d for femur and 0.64 mm/d for tibias. Consolidation index was 28 d/cm (18 to 43) and 39 d/cm (20 to 47), respectively. Time from completion of lengthening to independent full weight-bearing as observed in clinic was 45 days (21 to 70) and 34.2 days (23 to 50), respectively. ASAMI bone and functional scores were favorable and PROMS demonstrated high patient satisfaction levels. No significant complications were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

We have demonstrated excellent clinical results and high patient satisfaction with intramedullary lengthening in a pediatric/adolescent population. We highly recommend thorough preoperative preparation, patient education, and a multidisciplinary approach.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Cost Comparison of Tibial Distraction Osteogenesis Using External Lengthening and Then Nailing vs Internal Magnetic Lengthening Nails

Aim and objective

Tibial lengthening can be performed by distraction osteogenesis via lengthening and then nailing (LATN) or by using a magnetic lengthening nail (MLN). MLN avoids the complications of external fixation while providing accurate and easily controlled lengthening. Concerns exist still regarding the high upfront cost of the magnetic nail, which serves to limit its use in resource-poor areas and decrease adoption among cost-conscious surgeons. The purpose of this study was to compare the hospital, surgeon, and total cost between LATN and MLN when used for tibial lengthening.

Materials and methods

A retrospective review was performed comparing consecutive tibial lengthening using either LATN (n = 17) or MLN (n = 15). The number of surgical procedures and time to union were compared. Surgeon and hospital payments were used to perform cost analysis after adjusting for inflation using the consumer price index (CPI).

Results

Patients treated with MLN underwent fewer surgeries (3.6 vs 2.8; p < 0.001) but had a longer time to union as compared with patients treated with LATN (19.79 vs 27.84 weeks; p = 0.006). Total costs were similar ($50,345 vs $46,162; p = 0.249) although surgeon fees were lower for MLN as compared with LATN ($6,426 vs $4,428; p < 0.001).

Conclusion

LATN and MLN had similar overall costs in patients undergoing tibial lengthening. MLN was associated with fewer procedures but a longer time to union as compared with LATN.

Clinical significance

Despite an increased upfront cost in MLN, there was no difference in total cost between LATN and MLN when used for tibial lengthening. Thus, in cases where either method is feasible, cost may not be a deciding factor when selecting the appropriate treatment.

How to cite this article

Dvorzhinskiy A, Zhang DT, Fragomen AT, et al. Cost Comparison of Tibial Distraction Osteogenesis Using External Lengthening and Then Nailing vs Internal Magnetic Lengthening Nails. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2021;16(1):14-19.

Hip-Sparing Equalization Procedures for Leg-Length Discrepancy After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Case Series

BACKGROUND

Leg-length discrepancy (LLD) after primary THA is not uncommon. Little is known, however, about the role of hip-sparing procedures for equalization of LLD after THA.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

The aim of this study is to report our experiences with these techniques in patients presenting at one institution over a 10-year period.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed records at one institution to find patients who had sought surgical treatment for LLD after THA between January 2007 and August 2017. Patients who had LLD related to conditions other than the THA, such as bone loss or traumatic defects, were excluded. We recorded the time after THA, laterality, and LLD. Assessment of LLD was performed using clinical and radiographic examinations. Patient demographics and true LLD were recorded, as were prior conservative treatment, equalization procedure performed, final leg length after equalization surgery, time to healing, and complications.

RESULTS

After exclusion of patients with LLD related to other causes, eight patients in whom conservative treatment had failed and who had undergone hip-sparing leg-length equalization surgery were included in the study. The average age was 44.6 years (range, 18 to 66 years). Seven of the patients were female. The pre-operative mean LLD was 3.1 cm (range 1.5 to 7 cm). In those who were long after THA, ipsilateral (THA-side) shortening of femur with a retrograde intramedullary nail (IMN; n = 1) or with a plate (n = 1) was performed. In those who were short after THA, ipsilateral femur lengthening with retrograde Precice nails (n = 2), ipsilateral tibial lengthening with Precice nails (n = 2), or contralateral femur shortening with a retrograde IMN (n = 2) was performed. The average time to full consolidation or union was 6.6 months (range, 2 to 19 months). Two patients had delayed union. All patients but one were satisfied with final results.

CONCLUSION

We believe that hip-sparing equalization procedures can be part of the treatment algorithm of LLD after THA. These advancements in the field are promising and might expand the indications of lengthening and equalization procedures to include LLD after THA.

How should we lengthen post-traumatic limb defects? a systematic review and comparison of motorized lengthening systems, combined internal and external fixation and external fixation alone

PURPOSE

Various external fixation systems for lower extremity long bone deformities have been used to various degrees of success, while newer mechanical lengthening nail (MLN) systems offer the potential for improved patient outcomes. Proponents of MLNs argue that they reduce the number of operations, infectious complications, and improve quality of life; however, the evidence to support these claims is scant. This systematic review aims to evaluate the optimal lengthening system for treating post-traumatic long bone deformity.

METHODS

The systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. PUBMED, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library were searched for comparative studies of lengthening techniques among adult patients with axial deformities. Studies were screened and data extracted in duplicate. Treatment groups were pooled into external fixation (EF) alone, combined internal and external fixation (CIF), and mechanical lengthening nail (MLN). Outcomes were mean lengthening achieved, lengthening index, and reported complications.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies with 725 patients (mean age: 29.6 years, 74% male) were included. Nearly all of the studies were either prospective or retrospective cohort studies (n = 12), with one randomized controlled trial of moderate study quality. The mean limb lengthening achieved, lengthening index, and rate of reoperation were similar among the MLN, EF, and CIF groups.

CONCLUSION

The purported decreased the duration of lengthening and the risk of reoperation associated with MLNs was not demonstrated in this review. Patients with post-traumatic leg length deformities remain a challenging patient population to treat, with intervention being associated with high rates of infectious complications and need for revision operations.

How should we lengthen post-traumatic limb defects? a systematic review and comparison of motorized lengthening systems, combined internal and external fixation and external fixation alone

PURPOSE

Various external fixation systems for lower extremity long bone deformities have been used to various degrees of success, while newer mechanical lengthening nail (MLN) systems offer the potential for improved patient outcomes. Proponents of MLNs argue that they reduce the number of operations, infectious complications, and improve quality of life; however, the evidence to support these claims is scant. This systematic review aims to evaluate the optimal lengthening system for treating post-traumatic long bone deformity.

METHODS

The systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. PUBMED, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library were searched for comparative studies of lengthening techniques among adult patients with axial deformities. Studies were screened and data extracted in duplicate. Treatment groups were pooled into external fixation (EF) alone, combined internal and external fixation (CIF), and mechanical lengthening nail (MLN). Outcomes were mean lengthening achieved, lengthening index, and reported complications.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies with 725 patients (mean age: 29.6 years, 74% male) were included. Nearly all of the studies were either prospective or retrospective cohort studies (n = 12), with one randomized controlled trial of moderate study quality. The mean limb lengthening achieved, lengthening index, and rate of reoperation were similar among the MLN, EF, and CIF groups.

CONCLUSION

The purported decreased the duration of lengthening and the risk of reoperation associated with MLNs was not demonstrated in this review. Patients with post-traumatic leg length deformities remain a challenging patient population to treat, with intervention being associated with high rates of infectious complications and need for revision operations.

How should we lengthen post-traumatic limb defects? a systematic review and comparison of motorized lengthening systems, combined internal and external fixation and external fixation alone

PURPOSE

Various external fixation systems for lower extremity long bone deformities have been used to various degrees of success, while newer mechanical lengthening nail (MLN) systems offer the potential for improved patient outcomes. Proponents of MLNs argue that they reduce the number of operations, infectious complications, and improve quality of life; however, the evidence to support these claims is scant. This systematic review aims to evaluate the optimal lengthening system for treating post-traumatic long bone deformity.

METHODS

The systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. PUBMED, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library were searched for comparative studies of lengthening techniques among adult patients with axial deformities. Studies were screened and data extracted in duplicate. Treatment groups were pooled into external fixation (EF) alone, combined internal and external fixation (CIF), and mechanical lengthening nail (MLN). Outcomes were mean lengthening achieved, lengthening index, and reported complications.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies with 725 patients (mean age: 29.6 years, 74% male) were included. Nearly all of the studies were either prospective or retrospective cohort studies (n = 12), with one randomized controlled trial of moderate study quality. The mean limb lengthening achieved, lengthening index, and rate of reoperation were similar among the MLN, EF, and CIF groups.

CONCLUSION

The purported decreased the duration of lengthening and the risk of reoperation associated with MLNs was not demonstrated in this review. Patients with post-traumatic leg length deformities remain a challenging patient population to treat, with intervention being associated with high rates of infectious complications and need for revision operations.

[Retrograde bone transport nail in a posttraumatic femoral bone defect]

We report the case of a 28-year-old man who developed nonunion with complex deformity after treatment of a distal femoral fracture with an antegrade femoral nail. The resulting deformity was as follows: 10° varus, 21° external torsion, 1.8 cm of foreshortening and translation malalignment. After resection of the pseudarthrosis, a retrograde segmental transport nail was implanted. During the same surgical procedure, acute internal torsion, valgization and lengthening correction was performed. The segment transport was performed using a magnetically driven internal transport nail. Seven months after surgery, bony consolidation of the distraction section and the docking site was observed. The leg axis was straight and the rotational movement ranges of the knee and hip corresponded the dimensions of the contralateral side.

Leg Length Discrepancy- Treatment Indications and Strategies

BACKGROUND

Many people have leg-length discrepancies of greater or lesser severity. No evidence-based studies on the need for treatment are currently available.

METHODS

This review is based on publications retrieved by a selective search in the PubMed database, as well as on published recommendations from Germany and abroad and on the authors' own clinical experience.

RESULTS

If the two legs are of different lengths, this is generally because one leg is too short. It is debated whether leg-length discrepancy causes pain or long-term musculoskeletal disturbances. A direct connection to back pain is questionable, but a mildly elevated incidence of knee arthritis seems likely. The evidence base on the indications for treatment of leg-length discrepancy is poor; only informal consensus recommendations are available. There are a wide variety of conservative and surgical treatment options. The final extent of a leg-length discrepancy first noted during the growing years can be estimated with predictive algorithms to within 2 cm. The treatments that can be considered include a shoe insert, a high shoe, or an orthosis, surgically induced slowing of growth by blockade of the epiphyseal plates around the knee joint, or leg lengthening with osteotomy and subsequent distraction of the bone callus with fully implanted or external apparatus. Changes in leg length exert marked mechanical stress on the soft tissues. If the predicted leg-length discrepancy exceeds 5 cm, initial leg-lengthening treatment can already be considered during the patient's growing years.

CONCLUSION

It must be discussed with each patient individually whether the treatment should be conservative or surgical. The extent of the discrepancy is not the sole determining factor for the mode of treatment. The decision to treat is always elective.

Complications of Limb Lengthening With Motorized Intramedullary Nails

Intramedullary limb lengthening (LL) is now achievable through motorized intramedullary devices. While this technology mitigates some complications of external-fixation-based lengthening, many complications common to all lengthening procedures persist. New challenges and complications exclusive to this newer technology are also presented. The LL surgeon should be aware of and ready to respond to complications involving device malfunctions, poor local bony and soft-tissue biology, patient compliance, neurovascular compromise, joint instability, regenerate problems, and others. While technology will continue to evolve, study of and adherence to foundational principles of LL will minimize risks and optimize patient outcomes.

Post-retrieval functionality testing of PRECICE lengthening nails: The "Sleeper" nail concept

INTRODUCTION

PRECICE intramedullary magnetic lengthening nails, introduced in 2011, have changed the landscape of long bone limb lengthening. The implants have a stroke ranging from 5 to 8 cm, but it may be desirable to perform part of the lengthening at one treatment, allow bone healing, leave the implant in place, dormant, and then return one or more years later to re-lengthen with the same implant. We call this the "sleeper" nail concept. This strategy may be gentler for the joints and soft tissues. Would the nail mechanism still be functional one or more years later?

METHODS

We tested 102 intact, consecutively explanted nails. Using a "fast magnet," the male part was lengthened to 5 mm short of its maximum stroke capacity and retracted back to 35 mm (all nails start with the male part exposed 30 mm). The nails passed the test if the male part succeeded in lengthening to 5 mm short of the maximum stroke capacity and back to 35 mm (or only retract in case fully deployed at testing). During our testing, the nails were prevented from reaching their full capacity of lengthening/retraction to avoid jamming the gears. Failure was defined as the inability or partial ability to complete the process.

RESULTS

Eighty-six nails (84.3%) performed successfully according to our testing standard. When comparing successful and failed nails in terms of nail type, generation, diameter, length and in vivo interval, there was no statistical significance. Comparing both groups in terms of status at testing (fully deployed or not) showed statistical significance with 9 of the 16 failed nails fully deployed at testing (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Dormant PRECICE nails can be reactivated for further lengthening. The results imply that full deployment may damage the mechanism, making future re-use by retracting and then re-lengthening unsuccessful. The candidate nails for this purpose should not have any signs of clear damage (bending or breakage) and should not have been fully deployed. However, surgeons and patients should be aware of the need for possible nail exchange if the "sleeper" nail fails to wake up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV case series analysis of retrieved surgical implants.

Lengthening Nails for Distraction Osteogenesis: A Review of Current Practice and Presentation of Extended Indications

PURPOSE

Circular frames have been the gold standard of treatment for complex deformity corrections and bone loss. However, despite the success of frames, patient satisfaction has been low, and complications are frequent. Most recently, lengthening nails have been used to correct leg length discrepancies. In this article, we review the current trends in deformity correction with emphasis on bone lengthening and present our case examples on the use of lengthening nails for management of complex malunions, non-unions, and a novel use in bone transport.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A nonsystematic literature review on the topic was performed. Four case examples from our institute, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals, East Sussex, England, UK, were included.

RESULTS

New techniques based on intramedullary bone lengthening and deformity correction are replacing the conventional external frames. Introduction of lengthening and then nailing and lengthening over a nail techniques paved the way for popularization of the more recent lengthening nails. Lengthening nails have gone through evolution from the first mechanical nails to motorized nails and more recently the magnetic lengthening nails. Two case examples demonstrate successful use of lengthening nails for management of malunion, and two case examples describe novel use in management of non-unions, including the first report in the literature of plate-assisted bone segment transport for the longest defect successfully treated using this novel technique.

CONCLUSION

With the significant advancement of intramedullary lengthening devices with lower complications rates and higher patient satisfaction, the era of the circular frame may be over.

HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE

Barakat AH, Sayani J, O'Dowd-Booth C, et al. Lengthening Nails for Distraction Osteogenesis: A Review of Current Practice and Presentation of Extended Indications. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2020;15(1):54-61.

Repeated intramedullary stabilization following failed telescopic nail lengthening - An appropriate treatment strategy

Externally magnetic-controlled intramedullary telescopic nails for bone lengthening have recently gained popularity due to many advantages when compared to more traditional lengthening methods. Patients requiring lengthening often present with a clinical history of previous multiple surgeries increasing the risk for complications of further procedures. However, studies regarding the treatment of complications following implantation of these devices remain scarce in literature. Therefore, we report our experience with revision surgery after lengthening with a telescopic intramedullary lengthening nail. In 6 out of 20 cases (30%) of lower limb lengthening for leg length discrepancy revision surgery was necessary. Two revisions were necessary due to nail breakage while the other 4 cases required a secondary procedure for non-union. In all cases, revision surgery included standard intramedullary locking nailing with additional autologous bone grafting. The median interval between index and revision surgery was 11.5 months (range 2-15 months). Satisfying clinical results, the intended extend of lengthening and bony consolidation was observed in all 6 patients. We conclude that revision surgery using an intramedullary locking nail with autologous bone grafting after failed telescopic nail-based lengthening represents an useful salvage procedure in these cases.