Early skin toxicity predicts better outcomes, and early tumor shrinkage predicts better response after cetuximab treatment in advanced colorectal cancer

Impact of early tumor shrinkage on quality of life in patients treated with first-line cetuximab plus chemotherapy for unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer: results of Phase II QUACK trial

PURPOSE

Although early tumor shrinkage (ETS) is a predictor of improved overall survival (OS), the association between ETS and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) remains unclear for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with first-line cetuximab plus chemotherapy.

METHODS

The data were collected from a prospective trial that assessed HRQOL using the EORTC QLQ-C30. The impact of ETS on HRQOL was estimated using a linear mixed-effects model for repeated measures.

RESULTS

ETS was achieved in 82 (64.1%) of 128 mCRC patients treated with first-line cetuximab plus chemotherapy, and these patients had a significantly longer OS than those without ETS (HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.20-0.72; P = .002). Asymptomatic patients with ETS had a favorable OS, while symptomatic patients without ETS had a worse OS (2-year OS rates, 77.8% vs. 42.5%). Symptomatic patients with ETS had similar outcomes as asymptomatic patients without ETS (2-year OS rates, 64.1% vs. 67.0%). For symptomatic patients, ETS was associated with improved HRQOL scores between baseline and 8 weeks: the mean changes for patients with and without ETS were 5.86 and -4.94 for global health status (GHS)/QOL, 26.73 and 3.79 for physical functioning, and 13.58 and -3.10 for social functioning, respectively. The improved HRQOL was comparable to that of asymptomatic patients without ETS. For asymptomatic patients, ETS showed a decreased deterioration in HRQOL.

CONCLUSION

Our findings highlight the importance of ETS for HRQOL and prognostic estimates, and assessing ETS may provide clinically useful information for physicians and patients to make more informed decisions.

Interleukin-33 as an early predictor of cetuximab treatment efficacy in patients with colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Cetuximab is used for colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment. However, the early biomarker of treatment efficacy of cetuximab has not been identified.

METHODS

After 1 year of cetuximab treatment, patients were divided into an effective group and an ineffective group. The interleukin-33 (IL-33) level and the distribution of lymphatic cells in patients were investigated by analyzing the peripheral blood mononuclear cells via flow cytometry analysis and ELISA. The correlation between IL-33 immunomodulatory effect and cetuximab treatment efficacy was determined through experiments in vivo and in vitro.

RESULTS

The IL-33 level in the peripheral blood was increased at 4 weeks after cetuximab administration of effective group, meanwhile, the osteopontin (OPN) was reduced. Whereas neither IL-33 level nor OPN level of ineffective patients changed. In the effective group, the number of natural killer (NK) and CD8+ T cells were increased. Moreover, CD137 and CD107a expression on NK cells were higher in the effective group compared to the ineffective group. In vitro cetuximab treatment also increased the number of NK and CD8+ T cells as well as CD137 and CD107a expression upon IL-33 stimulation. Moreover, the secretion of OPN was inhibited by IL-33 administration in cetuximab-treated PBMCs from the effective group patients. IL-33 upregulated the cytotoxicity of NK cells and inhibited tumor cells growth in the effective cetuximab treatment mice.

CONCLUSION

Effective cetuximab treatment induced a change of IL-33 and OPN at the early stage and triggered the NK cells antitumor activity. Consequently, significantly increased IL-33 level and decreased OPN level in the peripheral blood at the early treatment are proposed as potential predictors of cetuximab treatment efficacy.

Relation of cetuximab-induced skin toxicity and early tumor shrinkage in metastatic colorectal cancer patients: results of the randomized phase 3 trial FIRE-3 (AIO KRK0306)

BACKGROUND

Cetuximab-induced skin toxicity (Cet-ST) is positively associated with outcome in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Besides its predictive relevance for targeted therapy, we investigated its prognostic impact with early tumor shrinkage (ETS) ≥20%, another on-treatment surrogate for clinical outcome in FIRE-3.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

FIRE-3 evaluated first-line FOLFIRI (folinic acid, fluorouracil and irinotecan) plus cetuximab (FOLFIRI/Cet) versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab (FOLFIRI/Bev) in mCRC patients with RAS-WT tumors (i.e. wild-type in KRAS and NRAS exons 2-4). Retrospective data on Cet-ST that occurred during cycles 1-3 of treatment were correlated with efficacy endpoints, including ETS. To control for guarantee-time bias, only patients who had completed three or more treatment cycles were considered.

RESULTS

Of 199 patients treated with FOLFIRI/Cet, 181 (91.0%) completed three or more treatment cycles. A significant survival benefit of FOLFIRI/Cet over FOLFIRI/Bev was only evident in patients developing Cet-ST grade 2-3 [41.0 versus 26.6 months; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.73; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.61-0.87; P < 0.001] compared with Cet-ST grade 0-1 (HR = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.67-1.20; P = 0.48). Regarding prognosis, Cet-ST grade 2-3 (n = 75; 41.4%), compared with Cet-ST grade 0-1 (n = 106; 58.6%), was associated with prolonged overall survival (OS; HR = 0.62; 95% CI: 0.42-0.91; P = 0.01). In multivariate analysis, both Cet-ST (HR = 0.66; 95% CI: 0.50-0.87; P = 0.003) and ETS (HR = 0.55; 95% CI: 0.41-0.74; P < 0.0001) were independently prognostic for OS. Absence of both Cet-ST grade ≥2 and ETS identified a subgroup of patients with very poor prognosis (median OS 15.1 months).

CONCLUSIONS

In FIRE-3, the addition of cetuximab to FOLFIRI was associated with superior OS compared with FOLFIRI/Bev only in patients developing Cet-ST grade ≥2. Regarding prognostic relevance, both Cet-ST and ETS were independent and early predictors of survival. The present analysis supports that a combined evaluation of on-treatment parameters such as Cet-ST and ETS may help to guide treatment of mCRC.

Molecular Profiling of EGFR Status to Identify Skin Toxicity in Colorectal Cancer: A Clinicopathological Review

Colorectal cancer (CRC) represents an important health problem, being the third most common type of cancer. In Romania, the CRC incidence has doubled over the years. Both environmental factors and genetic susceptibility are very important for the pathogenesis of CRC. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) plays an extremely important role in CRC tumorigenesis. Overexpression or dysregulation of EGFR pathway molecules are frequently associated with tumor aggressiveness and patient response to treatment. Based on these considerations, EGFR became one of the first targets of molecular therapies used in CRC. At present, cetuximab and panitumumab are considered to be essential in the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer expressing the KRAS wild-type gene and EGFR. The main adverse effect for both cetuximab and panitumumab is skin toxicity, present in approximately 80% of patients. The risk of secondary infections, in particular of bacterial infections, is also increased. Cases of staphylococcal infection associated with skin peeling, cellulite, erysipelas, and even Staphylococcus sepsis, were reported. For a long time cutaneous toxicity has been a positive predictor in the efficacy of anti-EGFR treatment, but compliance with treatment and the quality of life of patients with metastatic CRC decreases in the presence of these skin reactions. That is why we emphasize the necessity and importance of using a modern method (molecular analysis of gene polymorphisms possibly supplemented by targeted confocal laser endomicroscopy) to identify a molecular diagnosis, in order to foresee and prevent the appearance of skin reactions and to manage skin toxicity.

The Regenerative Horizon: Opportunities for Nursing Research and Practice

Background

Regenerative technologies aim to restore organ form and function. Technological advances in regenerative treatments have led to patients increasingly seeking these therapies. The readiness of nursing to fully contribute to this emerging healthcare field is uncertain.

Purpose

The goal of this discipline‐oriented overview is to enhance awareness in the nursing community regarding regenerative science, and to provide suggestions for nursing research contributions and practice implications.

Methods

Evolving and applied cutting‐edge therapies, such as regenerative immunotherapies with chimeric antigen receptor expressing T lymphocytes, are highlighted in the context of emerging opportunities for nurses in practice and research.

Discussion

Next generation nurses will increasingly be at the forefront of new therapies poised to make chronic illnesses curable, thus restoring health and function to diverse groups of individuals.

Clinical Relevance

The regenerative care model imposes on the nursing community the imperative to (a) increase research awareness; (a) educate, develop, and deploy a skilled nursing workforce; (c) integrate regenerative technologies into nursing practice; and (d) embrace the regenerative technologies horizon as a future in health care.

Early tumor shrinkage after first-line medical treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Early tumor shrinkage (ETS) is a response-related endpoint of clinical trials of chemotherapy (CHT) of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). It identifies a dimensional reduction of tumor size by at least 20-30% after 6-8 weeks of CHT.

METHODS

A literature search of randomized trials of systemic treatment including CHT with or without antiangiogenics or anti-EGFR inhibitors in patients with mCRC has been conducted, and studies reporting the results of the relationship of ETS with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were selected.

RESULTS

Twelve trials, including 3117 patients, have been included; all data were retrospective and only 72% of the enrolled patients have been evaluated for ETS. Two meta-analyses, each including 20 study cohorts from the selected 12 trials, reported a strong relationship of ETS with OS (HR 0.62; CIs 0.55-0.69) and of ETS with PFS (HR 0.66; CIs 0.60-0.73). However, both meta-analyses displayed a high level of heterogeneity. Among nine possible moderators, three variables (median age, surgery of metastases, and publication year) were able to explain at least a part of this heterogeneity.

CONCLUSION

ETS is a simple and interesting intermediate endpoint for clinical practice and future trials of medical treatments of patients with mCRC, but a large prospective analysis and validation are mandatory.

Update review of skin adverse events during treatment of lung cancer and colorectal carcinoma with epidermal growth receptor factor inhibitors

The past decades have witnessed a rapid increase in the use of molecularly targeted therapies. One class of agents includes the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFRIs), which afford patients longer progression-free survival (PFS) times, especially among non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC). Certain adverse effects, particularly skin toxicity, are mainly manifested as rash, xerosis, pruritus, nails changes, hair changes and mucositis. Previous studies reported the adverse events occurred based on the cutaneous inflammation reaction. Treatment recommended glucocorticoids and antibiotics. It is suggested that skin toxicity is an important issue because it usually affects patients' quality of life (QoL) and still causes dose reduction or discontinuation of targeted therapies. For these reasons, more and more oncologists and dermatologists recognize the importance of recognition and management of skin toxicities with the expansion in availability of EGFRIs. In this review, we conducted a systematic review of recent data to examine the types and frequencies of dermatologic toxicities associated with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapies in NSCLC and mCRC. In addition, we would like to explore the management and treatment options currently used by clinicians based on the possible mechanism.

Prognostic role of epiregulin/amphiregulin expression in recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer treated with cetuximab

BACKGROUND

Cetuximab combined with chemoradiotherapy chemotherapy is the standard therapy for recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). However, survival benefit is limited. The purpose of this study was to investigate the expression of epiregulin (EREG) and amphiregulin (AREG), as predictive prognostic markers for the efficacy of cetuximab combined with chemotherapy in R/M HNSCC.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 37 patients diagnosed with R/M HNSCC. Tumor samples were analyzed for EREG and AREG mRNA gene expression, and clinical outcomes evaluated.

RESULTS

Values of EREG and AREG were associated with significantly longer overall survival (OS) (P = .03 and P = .01, respectively), as well as progression-free survival (PFS) (P = .04 and P = .04, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that AREG expression was significantly associated with OS and PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with recurrent/metastatic HNSCC with higher EREG and AREG gene expression appear to benefit more from cetuximab combined with chemoradiotherapy chemotherapy than those with lower expression.

Comparative Safety of Targeted Therapies for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer between Elderly and Younger Patients: a Study Using the International Pharmacovigilance Database

BACKGROUND

Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is increasingly treated using targeted therapies. Post-marketing safety of these agents is understudied, especially in the elderly.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare, according to age, the adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of targeted therapies used for mCRC in real life.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

An extraction of VigiBase, which contains World Health Organization individual case safety reports (ICSRs), was performed. All ADR reports with aflibercept, bevacizumab, cetuximab, panitumumab, or regorafenib used in CRC were considered. For all drugs, chi-square tests were used to compare frequencies of serious ADRs between patients aged ≥75 and <75 years. For selected ADRs and each drug, the drug-ADR association compared to other anticancer drugs was estimated through the proportional reporting ratio (PRR) in both age groups.

RESULTS

There were 21,565 ICSRs included, among which 74% were serious and 11% were fatal. Median age was 64 years (Inter Quartile Range = 56-71) and 15% of patients were aged ≥75; 57% were male. Serious ICSRs accounted for 47,292 ADRs. Neutropenia was not more reported in elderly for all drugs while diarrhea was more reported in elderly for panitumumab. Cardiac disorders were more reported in elderly patients, in particular heart failure, especially for bevacizumab, cetuximab, and regorafenib, as were respiratory, thoracic, and mediastinal disorders. Most of PRR were not different between the two groups, except encephalopathies, which were significantly associated with bevacizumab in the elderly only.

CONCLUSIONS

ADRs related to targeted therapies used for mCRC treatment were different across age groups; yet, not systematically more reported or worse in elderly patients. Selected elderly patients could, therefore, be treated with these targeted therapies.

Prolonged Overall Treatment Time and Lack of Skin Rash Negatively Impact Overall Survival in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer Patients Treated with Radiotherapy and Concomitant Cetuximab

BACKGROUND

Cetuximab, a chimeric monoclonal antibody against EGFR sensitizes tumors to radiotherapy (RT), but is associated with skin and mucosal toxicity.

OBJECTIVE

We report outcomes and tolerance of definitive RT in association with cetuximab in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma (LASCC) of the head and neck.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2006 and 2011, 92 consecutive patients with LASCC of the head and neck were treated with RT and concomitant weekly cetuximab. Median age was 61.7 years. Most patients presented with oropharyngeal tumors (52.2%) and stage IV disease (77.2%).

RESULTS

Sixty-nine patients received at least 7 cycles of cetuximab. Cetuximab was stopped at the first infusion following allergic reactions in four patients. During RT, 37% of patients developed grade ≥ 3 dermatitis; grade ≥ 2 cetuximab-induced rash occurred in 43 patients (46.7%). Severe mucositis (grade ≥ 3) affected 57.6% of patients. Ten percent of patients did not receive the full course of RT, and temporary discontinuation due to acute toxicity was frequent and affected 37 patients (53%). The median RT overall treatment time (OTT) in patients with interrupted RT was 56 days (47-75) compared to 51 days (47-65) in patients who did not require toxicity-related radiation interruptions (p < 0.05). After a median follow-up of 17.5 months (1.3-107.6) for all patients, median overall survival was 17.9 months (95% CI: 12.7-23.2), and loco-regional control (LRC) was 9.2 months (95% CI: 3.9-14.4). On multivariate analysis, hemoglobin concentration and occurrence of rash grade ≥ 2 were independent prognostic factors for LRC (p = 0.023 and p = 0.006, respectively). Lack of rash and extended OTT negatively impacted overall survival (p = 0.048 and 0.052, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Skin and mucosal toxicity remains an issue in patients with LASCC of the head and neck treated with concomitant cetuximab and RT. Severe toxicity leads to treatment interruptions and prolonged overall treatment time, with consequent decreased overall survival in these patients.

Dermatologic Toxicity Occurring During Anti-EGFR Monoclonal Inhibitor Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review

Monoclonal antibody inhibitors of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) have been shown to improve outcomes for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) without RAS gene mutations. However, treatment with anti-EGFR agents can be associated with toxicities of the skin, nails, hair, and eyes. Because these dermatologic toxicities can result in treatment discontinuation and affect patient quality of life, their management is an important focus when administering anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies. The present systematic review describes the current data reporting the nature and incidence of, and management and treatment options for, dermatologic toxicities occurring during anti-EGFR treatment of mCRC. A search of the National Library of Medicine PubMed database from January 1, 2009, to August 18, 2016, identified relevant reports discussing dermatologic toxicity management among patients with mCRC receiving anti-EGFR therapy. The studies were grouped by type and rated by level of evidence using the GRADE approach developed by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Overall, 269 reports were reviewed (nonrandomized trials, n = 120; randomized trials, n = 31; retrospective studies, n = 15; reviews, n = 39). Dermatologic toxicity of any grade occurs in most patients who receive anti-EGFR therapy; approximately 10% to 20% of patients experienced grade 3/4 toxicity. The most common dermatologic toxicities include papulopustular/acneiform rash, xerosis, and pruritus; however, nail changes, hair abnormalities, and ocular conditions also occur. Guidance for managing these toxicities includes the use of inexpensive emollient ointments and moisturizers, avoidance of sun exposure, avoidance of irritants, and the use of short showers. Several studies also found that preemptive treatment was more effective than reactive treatment at limiting the incidence and severity of skin toxicity. With appropriate treatment, the dermatologic toxicities associated with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody therapy can be managed, minimizing patient discomfort and the need for therapy interruption and/or discontinuation. Additionally, preemptive treatment can reduce dermatologic toxicity severity, ultimately yielding better quality of life.

On-treatment markers as predictors to guide anti-EGFR MoAb treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Skin toxicity (ST) and early tumor shrinkage (ETS) are early phenomenon during the anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody (MoAb) treatment. We conducted a meta-analysis and included relevant studies that reported the impact of ST and ETS on survival- and life quality-based outcome of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with anti-EGFR MoAb.

METHODS

Relevant studies were identified from PubMed and Embase reporting the correlation of ST and ETS with the clinical outcome of mCRC patients treated with anti-EGFR MoAb. We also collected evidences on the impact of ST and ETS on absolute benefit acquired from additional anti-EGFR treatment and quality of life (ST only). Pooled hazard ratio and rate difference were all estimated by using random-effects model.

RESULTS

Pooled data revealed that the occurrence of ST and ETS ≥20% (v < 20%) during anti-EGFR MoAb treatment were both associated with better OS, PFS and ORR. This association could not be disturbed by KRAS status. Mean changes in safety follow-up life health state from baseline appeared unaffected by ST. Only mCRC patients with wild-type KRAS tumor who suffered grade 2+ ST could benefit from additional anti-EGFR treatment to chemotherapy or best supportive care (BSC) alone. ETS was also a predictor for absolute survival benefit acquired from additional anti-EGFR treatment for patients with wild-type KRAS tumors, and the more early shrinkage the tumor was, the much benefit was observed.

CONCLUSION

ST and ETS are predictive of absolute benefit acquired from anti-EGFR treatment in mCRC patients with wild-type KRAS tumors. These two on-treatment markers can be used for clinical decision-making if no adequate biological markers from tissues are provided.

Early tumour response as a survival predictor in previously- treated patients receiving triplet hepatic artery infusion and intravenous cetuximab for unresectable liver metastases from wild-type KRAS colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Early tumour shrinkage has been associated with improved survival in patients receiving cetuximab-based systemic chemotherapy for liver metastases from colorectal cancer (LM-CRC). We tested this hypothesis for previously treated LM-CRC patients receiving cetuximab (500 mg/m²) and triplet hepatic artery infusion (HAI) within European trial OPTILIV.

METHODS

Irinotecan (180 mg/m²), 5-fluorouracil (2800 mg/m²) and oxaliplatin (85 mg/m²) were given as chronomodulated or conventional delivery. Patients were retrospectively categorised as early responders (complete or partial RECIST response after three courses) or non-early responders (late or no response). Prognostic factors were determined using multivariate logistic or Cox regression models.

RESULTS

Response was assessed in 57 of 64 registered patients (89%), who had previously received one to three prior systemic chemotherapy protocols. An early response occurred at 6 weeks in 16 patients (28%; 9 men, 7 women), aged 33-76 years, with a median of 12 liver metastases (LMs) (2-50), involving five segments (1-8). Ten patients had a late response, and 31 patients had no response. Grade 3-4 fatigue selectively occurred in the non-early responders (0% versus 26%; p = 0.024). Early tumour response was jointly predicted by chronomodulation-odds ratio (OR): 6.0 (1.2-29.8; p = 0.029)-and LM diameter ≤57 mm-OR: 5.3 (1.1-25.0; p = 0.033). Early tumour response predicted for both R0-R1 liver resection-OR: 11.8 (1.4-100.2; p = 0.024) and overall survival-hazard ratio: 0.39 (0.17-0.88; p = 0.023) in multivariate analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Early tumour response on triplet HAI and systemic cetuximab predicted for complete macroscopic liver resection and prolonged survival for LM-CRC patients within a multicenter conversion-to-resection medicosurgical strategy. Confirmation is warranted for early response on HAI to guide decision making. Protocol numbers: EUDRACT 2007-004632-24 NCT00852228.

Final results and outcomes by prior bevacizumab exposure, skin toxicity, and hypomagnesaemia from ASPECCT: randomized phase 3 non-inferiority study of panitumumab versus cetuximab in chemorefractory wild-type KRAS exon 2 metastatic colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

The primary analysis of the ASPECCT study demonstrated that panitumumab was non-inferior to cetuximab for overall survival (OS) in patients with chemotherapy-refractory wild-type KRAS exon 2 metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Here, we report the final analysis results of ASPECCT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with wild-type KRAS exon 2 mCRC who progressed on or were intolerant to irinotecan- or oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy were randomised to receive panitumumab 6 mg/kg once every 2 weeks or cetuximab (400 mg/m²) followed by 250 mg/m² weekly. The primary end-point was OS assessed for non-inferiority. Patients were followed for survival for 24 months after the last patient was randomised and a final analysis was conducted. No formal hypothesis testing was done. Post hoc analyses of outcomes by prior bevacizumab exposure, worst-grade skin toxicity (0-1 versus 2-4) and worst-grade hypomagnesaemia (0 versus 1-4) were conducted.

RESULTS

Nine hundred ninety-nine patients were randomised and received ≥1 treatment dose (panitumumab, n = 499; cetuximab, n = 500). Median OS was 10.2 months with panitumumab versus 9.9 months with cetuximab (hazard ratio = 0.94; 95% confidence interval = 0.82-1.07). Median progression-free survival was 4.2 months with panitumumab and 4.4 months with cetuximab (hazard ratio = 0.98; 95% confidence interval = 0.87-1.12). Longer OS was observed for patients with increased skin toxicity and with hypomagnesaemia in both arms. Furthermore, OS was longer for patients with prior bevacizumab exposure treated with panitumumab than with cetuximab. The observed safety profiles were consistent with previous studies.

CONCLUSION

Consistent with the primary analysis, the final analysis of ASPECCT showed panitumumab was non-inferior to cetuximab for OS for patients with chemotherapy-refractory, wild-type KRAS exon 2 mCRC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01001377.