Upper urinary tract biopsy: an old device for a new approach

Imaging guided percutaneous renal biopsy: do it or not?

Since its first reported application, renal biopsy became an important part of the diagnostic algorithm, considered advantages and risks, to better manage therapeutic options. The biopsy can be performed with different techniques (open, laparoscopic, transjugular, transurethral and percutaneous). Currently, the percutaneous approach is the modality of choice. Percutaneous biopsy can be performed under CT or US guidance, but critical benefits and disadvantages have to be considered. Core needle biopsy is usually preferred to fine-needle aspiration because of the sample quality, usually obtaining multiple cores, especially in heterogeneous tumors. Principal complications are hematuria (1-10%), perinephric hematoma (10-90%), pneumothorax (0,6%), clinically significant pain (1,2%).

Cryobiopsy in the Upper Urinary Tract: Preclinical Evaluation of a Novel Device

OBJECTIVE

To develop a novel device for cryobiopsy of the upper urinary tract (UUT) and to evaluate its feasibility in a standardized preclinical setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Flexible cryoprobes (diameter 0.9 mm; cooling agent CO2) were developed and used to extract biopsies in porcine UUTs. Cryosamples obtained by ureterorenoscopy were systematically compared with biopsy specimens obtained with standard of care devices in terms of physical characteristics (deflection angle and irrigation flow rates) and histologic criteria (assessability).

RESULTS

Irrigation flow rates were significantly higher with introduced BIGopsy (2.8 ± 0.1) compared with standard forceps (0.94 ± 0.06; P < .001) and cryoprobe (1.1 ± 0.1; P < .001). Angular deflection was significantly reduced by the inserted cryoprobe (130.7° ± 1.2° vs 166.9° ± 1.1° [BIGopsy] or 161.4° ± 1.9° [standard forceps]; both P < .001). Significantly larger UUT tissue samples were obtained by the cryoprobe (mean specimen area 7.5 ± 2.5 vs 4.6 ± 2.5 mm² [BIGopsy] or 1.4 ± 1.4 mm² [standard forceps]; both P < .001). No crush artifacts were observed in cryosamples. Superior histologic assessability scores were achieved in samples obtained by the cryoprobe (mean 2.8 ± 0.8) and BIGopsy (2.3 ± 1.9) when compared with standard forceps (0.4 ± 0.9; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Cryobiopsy in the UUT is feasible and represents a viable new option to improve the diagnostic accuracy of histopathologic evaluation. Larger and more representative tissue samples can be obtained using a cryoprobe and artifacts may be avoided. Further optimization of the probe will reduce possible restrictions of ureterorenoscopy handling when the device is inserted.